THE BARROWS.
[Illustration: The Urns in Bratley Barrow.]
It is much to be regretted that Sir Walter Scott has left no account of
his excavations of various barrows in the Forest. However little we may
be able to determine by the evidence, or however conjectural the
inferences which we may draw, there will, at least, be this value to
this chapter, that it will put on record facts which otherwise could not
be known.
The barrows lie scattered all over the Forest, and are known to the
Foresters by the name of “butts,” some of the largest being
distinguished by local appellations. As in other parts of England, and
as in France, superstition connects them with the fairies; and so we
find on Beaulieu Plain two mounds known as the Pixey’s Cave and
Laurence’s Barrow.
My own excavations have been entirely confined to the Keltic barrows in
the northern part of the Forest.[238] But we will first of all take
those on Sway and Shirley Commons, opened by Warner.[239] The largest
stands a little to the east of Shirley Holms, close to Fetmoor Pond,
measuring about a hundred yards in circumference, and surrounded by
three smaller mounds varying from thirty to fifty yards, and two more
nearly indistinct. These two last are, I suspect, those opened by
Warner, where, after piercing the mound, he found on the natural soil a
layer of burnt earth mixed with charcoal, and below this, at the depth
of two feet, a small coarse urn with “an inverted brim,”[240] containing
ashes and calcined bones.
Some more lie to the northward, and are distinguished by being trenched.
Two of these also were opened by Warner, but he failed to discover
anything beyond charcoal and burnt earth.
His opinion was that these last belonged to the West-Saxons and the
former to the Kelts, who were slain defending their country against
Cerdic. So large a generalization, however, requires far stronger
evidence than can at present be produced.
Warner, too, is besides wrong in much of his criticism, such as that the
Teutonic nations never practised urn-burial; whilst the banks in which
he sees fortifications may be only the embankments within which dwelt a
British population.
Still there is some probability about the conjecture. A little farther
down the Brockenhurst stream are Ambrose Hole and Ampress Farm, both
names unmistakeably referring to Ambrosius Aurelianus, or Natan-Leod,
who led the Britons against their invaders. Nearer Lymington, too,
stands Buckland Rings,[241] a Roman camp, with its south and north sides
still nearly perfect, to which, perhaps, Natan-Leod fell back from
Calshot.
All this, however, must be accepted as mere conjecture. A more critical
examination of these barrows is still wanting.
Close to them, however, lies Latchmoor or Lichmoor Pond, the moor of
corpses, a name which we meet again a little to the westward in
Latchmoor Water, which flows by Ashley Common. The words are noticeable,
and in connection with Darrat’s (Dane-rout) stream, which is also not
far distant may point to a very different invasion.[242]
And now we will pass to the barrows which I have opened. The first are
situated on Bratley Plain, as the name shows, a wide heath, marked only
by a few hollies and the undulations of the scattered mounds. The
largest barrow lies close to the sixth milestone on the Ringwood Road.
In a straight line to the north, at the distance of a quarter of a mile
apart, rise three others, whilst round it on the east side lie a
quantity of small circles, so low as hardly to be discernible when the
heather is in bloom. An irregularly shaped oval, it rose in the centre
to a height of nearly six feet above the ground, measuring sixteen yards
in breadth, and twenty-two in length, with a circumference of from sixty
to sixty-five. On the south side was a depression from whence the gravel
had been obtained. We first cut a trench two yards broad, so as to take
the centre, and at about two feet and a half from the surface came upon
traces of charcoal, which increased till we reached the floor. A few
round stones, probably, as they bore some slight artificial marks, used
for slinging, and the flake of, perhaps, a flint knife, were the only
things found, and were all placed on the south side. We now cut the
mound from east to west, and on the east side, resting on the floor, we
discovered the remains of a Keltic urn. The parts were, however, in a
most fragile state, and in some instances had resolved themselves into
mere clay, and we could only obtain two small fragments, sufficient to
show the coarseness and extreme early age of the ware. No charcoal nor
osseous matter could be detected adhering to the sides, which, as we
shall see, is generally the case.
Round it, as was stated, lie a quantity of small grave-circles, varying
from twenty-five to ten yards in circumference, and scarcely better
defined than fairy-rings. Two of these I opened, and they corresponded
with the mounds on Sway Common examined by Warner, in having a grave
about three feet deep, in which we found only charcoal. This was,
however, the only point of resemblance, as they had no mound, and
contained no urn. One fact is worth noticing, that they were dug in a
remarkably hard gravelly soil, so hard that the labourers made very slow
progress even with their pick-axes. I did not excavate any more, as they
were all evidently of the same character. The choice of such a soil,
especially with the instruments they possessed, may, perhaps, show the
importance which the Britons attached to the rite of burial.
About a quarter of a mile, or rather less, from this great graveyard lay
a solitary mound, two feet and a half in height, having a circumference
of twenty-seven feet, a very common measurement, but without any trench.
Upon digging into it on the east side we quickly came, about four inches
from the surface, upon a patch of charcoal and burnt earth. Proceeding
farther, we reached two well-defined layers of charcoal, the uppermost
two feet from the top of the barrow. A band of red burnt earth,
measuring five inches, separated these two beds, in both of which in
places appeared white spots and patches of limy matter, the remains of
calcined bones. In the centre, as shown in the illustration, we found a
Keltic urn. Imbedded in a fine white burnt clay, which had hardened,
placed with its mouth uppermost, and ornamented with a rough
cable-moulding, and two small ears, it stood on the level of the natural
soil, rising to within sixteen inches of the top of the mound.
Digging on both sides, we discovered two more urns imbedded in the same
hard white sandy clay, so hard that it had to be scraped away with
knives. Like the first, they were made by hand, and when exposed quite
shone with a bright vermilion, which quickly changed to a dull grey. The
paste, however, was a light yellow, mixed with coarse gritty sand. And
the three were placed, as shown by the compass, exactly due north-east
and south-west.
A plain moulding ran round the south-west urn, which was considerably
smaller and not so well baked as the other two, and had very much fallen
to pieces from natural decay. This was placed eight inches lower than
the central urn.
The northernmost was the same size as the central, though differing from
it in the contraction of the rim, and when discovered was perfectly
whole, but was unfortunately fractured by being separated from a large
furze root, which had completely twined round the upper part. It, too,
was placed on a lower level, by four inches, than the central urn. The
two extreme urns were exactly five feet apart, and the interiors of them
all were blackened by the carbon from the charcoal, burnt earth, and
bones, which they contained.
Looking at their rude forms and large size, their straight sides, their
wide mouths, the thickness, and the rough gritty texture of the
paste,[243] the absence of nearly all ornamentation, and, with the
exception, perhaps, of a slinging stone, of all weapons, we shall not be
wrong in dating them as long anterior to the Roman invasion—how long a
more minute criticism and a greater accumulation of facts than is now
possessed, can alone determine.
There are, however, one or two points peculiarly noticeable about this
barrow—first, the enormous quantity of burnt earth, suggesting that the
funeral pyre was actually lit on the spot, which certainly was not the
case in most of the other barrows, where the charcoal is only sprinkled
here and there, or appears in the form of a small circular patch on the
floor. Secondly, the two bands of charcoal, so full of osseous matter,
would certainly go far to prove, what has been surmised by Bateman and
others, that the slaves or prisoners were immolated at the decease of
their master or conqueror.
Again, too, the different sizes and positions of the urns may, perhaps,
indicate either degrees of relationship or rank of the persons buried.
And this theory is somewhat corroborated by the contents. The central
urn was examined on the spot, and, like all the others, with the
exception of a round stone slightly indented, contained burnt earth,
limy matter, and at the bottom the larger bones, which were less
calcined, but which, owing to the want of proper means, we could not
preserve. The other two were opened at the British Museum. At the bottom
of the north-easternmost were also placed bones in a similar condition,
amongst which Professor Owen recognized the _femur_ and _radius_ of an
adult. The smallest urn also showed bones placed in the same manner at
the bottom, but in this case smaller, and amongst them Professor Owen
determined _processus dentatus_, and the body of the third cervical
vertebra, and was of opinion that they were those of a person of small
stature, or, perhaps, of a female. This is what might have been
expected. And the fact of their being put in the smallest vessel, which,
as we have noticed, was placed below the level of the others, certainly
indicates a distinction made in the mode of burial of persons of either
different ages or sexes.
The fact, too, that all the larger bones were placed by themselves at
the bottom is worth noticing, and shows that they must have been
carefully collected and separated from the burnt earth and charcoal of
the pyre.
About another quarter of a mile off rise two more barrows, measuring
exactly the same in circumference as the last, though not nearly so
high, being raised only sixteen inches above the ground. Upon opening
the southernmost, we soon came, on the east side, upon traces of
charcoal, which increased to a bed of an inch and a half in thickness as
we reached the centre. Here we found an urn of coarse pottery exactly
similar in texture to those in the previous barrow. It was, however, in
such a bad state of preservation, and so soft, from the wetness of the
ground, that the furze-roots had grown through the sides, and it
crumbled to bits on being touched. Some few pieces, though, near the
bottom, we were able to preserve. Its shape, however, was well shown by
the form which its contents had taken. It seems to have been, though
much smaller, exactly of the same rude, straight-sided, and wide-mouthed
pattern as the other urns, measuring seven inches in height, and in
circumference, near the top, two feet two inches, and at the bottom, one
foot four inches. The cast was composed entirely of burnt stones, and
black earth, and osseous matter, reduced to lime, in which the
furze-roots had imbedded themselves.
The fellow barrow, which was only about fifty yards distant, and whose
measurements were exactly the same, contained also charcoal, though not
in such large quantities, and fragments of an urn placed not in the
centre, but near the extreme western edge. The remains here were in a
still worse state of decomposition, and we could obtain no measurements,
but only one or two pieces of ware, which, in their general coarseness
and grittiness of texture, corresponded with the others, and not only
showed their Keltic manufacture, but their extreme early date.[244]
This last mound, I may add, was composed of gravel, whilst the other was
made simply of mould: and two depressions on the heath showed where the
material had been obtained.
About two miles to the north-east, close to Ocknell Pond, lies a single
barrow of much the same size as these two, though a great deal higher,
being raised in the centre to three feet and a half. We began the
excavation on the east side, proceeding to the centre, but found nothing
except some charcoal, and peculiarly-shaped rolled flints, placed on the
level of the ground.
We then made another trench from the north side, and close to some
charcoal, about a foot and a half below the raised surface, came upon
the neck of a Roman wine vessel (_ampulla_). Although we opened the
whole of the east side, we could not find the remaining portion. The
barrow bore no traces of having been previously explored, nor did the
soil appear to have been moved. The fracture was certainly not recent,
and it is very possible that some disappointed treasure-seekers in the
Middle Ages had forestalled us, and time had obliterated all their marks
in opening the mound.
[Illustration: Neck of Roman Wine Vessel, Keltic Urn, and Flint
Knives.]
From the position of the vessel at the top of the barrow, there had
evidently been a second interment. The remains, however, are in
accordance with what we might have expected. The barrow is situated not
far from the Romano-British potteries of Sloden, and close to it run
great banks, known as the Row-ditch, marking, in all probability, the
settlements of a Romano-British population.[245]
On Fritham Plain, not far from Gorely Bushes, lies another vast
graveyard. The grave-circles are very similar in size to those round the
large barrow on Bratley Plain, though a good deal higher, with, here and
there, some oval mounds ranged side by side, as in a modern churchyard.
In the autumn of 1862, I opened five of these, with the same result of
finding charcoal in all, though placed in different parts, but in all
instances resting on the natural ground, and giving evidence of only one
interment. As in other cases, the grave-heaps were often alternately
composed of mould and gravel. No traces of urns or celts were found, but
in one or two a quantity of small circular stones, with indistinct marks
of borings, which could hardly have accidentally collected.
About a quarter of a mile off, on the road to Whiteshoot,[246] lies,
however, a square mound, measuring nine yards each way, and averaging a
foot and a half in height. On opening it on the north side, we came upon
the fragments of an urn, but so much decayed that we could only tell
that they were, probably, Keltic. On the west side, another trench,
which had been made, showed the presence of charcoal, which kept
increasing till we reached the centre, where we found what appeared to
be the remains of three separate urns, placed in a triangle at about a
yard apart. These also were in the same decayed state, and crumbled to
pieces as we endeavoured to separate them from the soil. With some
difficulty we managed to preserve a few fragments which were identical
with those which had been previously discovered in the other barrows at
Bratley. They contained, like most of the other vessels, burnt stones
and white osseous matter reduced to lime. There seems, however, to have
been some difference in their texture with that of the fragments found
on the north side, which were less gritty and coarse, and which bore no
traces of charcoal or lime.[247]
We will now leave Fritham, and cross Sloden and Amberwood Plantation.
Not far from Amberwood Corner, and above Pitt’s Enclosure, stand two
barrows. The largest was opened thirty years ago by a labouring man,
who, to use his own language, “constantly dreamt that he should there
find a crock of gold.” His opening was rewarded by discovering only some
charcoal. In 1851, the Rev. J. Pemberton Bartlett also explored it with
still less success. It is, however, a remarkable barrow, and differs in
character from any of the preceding, being composed in the interior of
large sub-angular flints, and cased on the outside with a rampart of
earth. Beyond it lies another, very different in style, being made only
of earth. This was also opened by Mr. Bartlett, who found some pieces of
charcoal, and small fragments of a very coarsely-made urn.
About a mile away on Butt’s Plain rise five more barrows, and beyond
them again two more. Of the first five, two were explored by Mr.
Bartlett, who was unsuccessful, and two by myself.
The two which I opened lie on the right of the track leading from
Amberwood to the Fordingbridge road. The northernmost was considerably
the largest, having a circumference of fifty yards, and was composed
simply of gravel and earth. In it we found only a circle of charcoal
placed nearly in the centre on the level of the ground.
The other was more remarkable. It measured only thirty yards in
circumference, but was composed in the centre of raised earth, above
which were piled large rolled flints, making a stratum of from two to
three feet in depth on the sides, but gradually becoming thinner as it
reached the centre, which was barely covered. It thus totally differed
from that near Amberwood, where the earth flanked the stones instead of
being the nucleus round which they were placed. In it we found a circle
of charcoal ingrained with limy matter, a few remains of much calcined
bones, and a fine stone hammer bored with two holes slantwise, to give a
greater purchase to the handle.
Besides these, I opened a solitary barrow situated between Handycross
Pond and Pinnock Wood, close to Akercombe Bottom. It measured
twenty-seven yards in circumference, and three feet in height. After
digging into it near the centre, we found in the white sand, of which
the mound was chiefly composed, a good deal of charcoal on and below the
level of the ground, but failed to discover any traces of an urn,
although we went down to a considerable depth.
Further, a solitary oval mound stood on the south side of South Bentley,
half way between it and Anses Wood. It measured two feet and a half in
height, twelve yards in length, and seven in breadth. This also I
opened, but failed to find even any remains of charcoal, and, from the
easy-moving nature of the soil, am inclined to suspect that it was
modern, and raised for some other purpose than that of burial. On the
east side was a depression filled with water, from whence the soil was
taken.
The most remarkable barrow, if it can be so called, in this part of the
Forest, is at Black Bar, at the extreme west end of Linwood, measuring
nearly four hundred yards in circumference, and rising to the height of
forty feet or more. It is evidently in part factitious, for upon sinking
a pit ten feet deep we reached charcoal mixed with Roman pottery, but
not of a sepulchral character.
In its general appearance the mound is not unlike the famous Barney
Barn’s Hill, in Dibden Bottom, and close to it rises another, known as
the Fir Pound, not much inferior in size. I made other openings on the
top and sides, but discovered nothing further. To excavate it thoroughly
would require an enormous time, and would in all probability not repay
the labour. It looks, however, by the depressions on the summit, as if
it had once been the site of Keltic dwellings. And this is in some
measure corroborated by a small mound close to it, where, as if
apparently left or thrown away, we found placed in a hole a small
quantity of extremely coarse pottery—the coarsest and thickest which I
have ever seen. Again, too, in a field close by, known as Blackheath
Meadow, we everywhere met traces of Romano-British ware, very similar in
shape and texture to that in Sloden, described in the next chapter.
The whole district just round here is most interesting. About a mile to
the north is Latchmoor Stream and Latchmoor Green, marking, doubtless,
some burial-ground; and not far off stands one of those elevated places,
common in the Forest, with the misleading title of Castle.
I must not, too, forget to mention some barrows on Langley Heath, just
outside the present eastern boundary of the Forest, and especially
interesting from being situated so near to Calshot, where, as we have
seen, Cerdic probably landed. Seven of them were opened by the Rev. J.
Pemberton Bartlett. The mounds, averaging about twenty yards in
circumference, were, in some cases, slightly raised, as much as a foot
and a half, though in others nearly on a level with the natural surface
of the soil. In them all was found a single grave, though, in one
instance, two, running about three feet in depth, and containing only
burnt earth and charcoal. They thus exactly corresponded, with the
exception of the slight mound, with those on Bratley Plain.
With this we must conclude.[248] It would not be difficult to frame some
theory from these results. I, however, here prefer to allow the simple
facts to remain. As we have seen, the barrows in this part of the
Forest, like all others of the same period, contained nothing, with the
exception of the single stone-hammer, and the slinging pebbles, and the
flake of flint, but nearly plain urns, full of only burnt earth,
charcoal, and human bones. No iron, bronze, nor bone-work of any sort,
was found, which would still further go to prove their extreme early
age. Curiously enough, too, no teeth, bones, nor horn-cores of animals
were discovered, as so often are in Keltic barrows.[249] Like all
others, too, of an early date, there seem to have been several burials
in the same grave, though this, as on Fritham Plain, is very far from
being always the case. Some little regularity evidently prevailed with
the different septs. Some, as at Bratley, placed the charred remains in
a grave from two to three feet in depth; others, as at Butt’s Plain, on
the mere ground. On the other hand, a good deal of caprice seems to have
been exercised as to the materials with which each barrow was formed,
and the way and the shape in which it was built, as also the arrangement
of the charcoal.
Further, perhaps, the different grades of life and relationship were
marked by the presence and position of the urns. Whether this be so or
no, it is certain that the mounds here which contained mortuary vessels
were, as a rule, more elevated, and in nearly all instances placed by
themselves. The fact, too, of the cube-shaped mound with its remains of
four urns should be kept in mind.
Little more can with certainty be said. The flint knives which have been
picked up in the Forest, the stone hammer in the grave, the clumsy form
and make of the urns, the places, too, of burial—in the wide furzy
Ytene, in after-times the Bratleys, and Burleys, and Oakleys, of the
West-Saxons—all show a people whose living was gained rather by hunting
than agriculture or commerce.
[Illustration: Barrows on Beaulieu Plain.]