Yet it is not the volume, not the bulk only; cannot you see the white

sails swelling, and the proud vessel rising to the Pacific billows, the

north star sinking, and the advent of the Southern Cross; the thousand

miles of ocean without land around, the voyage through space made

visible as sea, the far, far south, the transit around a world? If

Italian painters had had such things as these to paint, if poets of old

time had had such things as these to sing, do you imagine they would

have been contented with crank caravels and tales thrice told already?

They had eyes to see that which was around them. Open your eyes and see

those things which are around us at this hour.

THE PIGEONS AT THE BRITISH MUSEUM

The front of the British Museum stands in the sunlight clearly marked

against the firm blue of the northern sky. The blue appears firm as if

solid above the angle of the stonework, for while looking towards

it--towards the north--the rays do not come through the azure, which is

therefore colour without life. It seems nearer than the southern sky,

it descends and forms a close background to the building; as you

approach you seem to come nearer to the blue surface rising at its

rear. The dark edges of sloping stone are distinct and separate, but

not sharp; the hue of the stone is toned by time and weather, and is so

indefinite as to have lost its hardness. Those small rounded bodies

upon the cornice are pigeons resting in the sun, so motionless and

neutral-tinted that they might be mistaken for some portion of the

carving. A double gilt ring, a circle in a circle, at the feet of an

allegorical figure gleams brightly against the dark surface. The sky

already seems farther away seen between the boles of stone, perpetual

shade dwells in their depth, but two or three of the pigeons fluttering

down are searching for food on the sunlit gravel at the bottom of the

steps. To them the building is merely a rock, pierced with convenient

caverns; they use its exterior for their purpose, but penetrate no

farther. With air and light, the sunlit gravel, the green lawn between

it and the outer railings--with these they are concerned, and with

these only. The heavy roll of the traffic in Oxford Street, audible

here, is nothing to them; the struggle for money does not touch them,

they let it go by. Nor the many minds searching and re-searching in the

great Library, this mental toil is no more to them than the lading of

the waggons in the street. Neither the tangible product nor the

intellectual attainment is of any value--only the air and light. There

are idols in the galleries within upon whose sculptured features the

hot Eastern sun shone thousands of years since. They were made by human

effort, however mistaken, and they were the outcome of human thought

and handiwork. The doves fluttered about the temples in those days,

full only of the air and light. They fluttered about the better temples

of Greece and round the porticos where philosophy was born. Still only

the light, the sunlight, the air of heaven. We labour on and think, and

carve our idols and the pen never ceases from its labour; but the lapse

of the centuries has left us in the same place. The doves who have not

laboured nor travailed in thought possess the sunlight. Is not theirs

the preferable portion?

The shade deepens as I turn from the portico to the hall and vast domed

house of books. The half-hearted light under the dome is stagnant and

dead. For it is the nature of light to beat and throb; it has a pulse

and undulation like the swing of the sea. Under the trees in the

woodlands it vibrates and lives; on the hills there is a resonance of

light. It beats against every leaf, and, thrown back, beats again; it

is agitated with the motion of the grass blades; you can feel it

ceaselessly streaming on your face. It is renewed and fresh every

moment, and never twice do you see the same ray. Stayed and checked by

the dome and book-built walls, the beams lose their elasticity, and the

ripple ceases in the motionless pool. The eyes, responding, forget to

turn quickly, and only partially see. Deeper thought and inspiration

quit the heart, for they can only exist where the light vibrates and

communicates its tone to the soul. If any imagine they shall find

thought in many books, certainly they will be disappointed. Thought

dwells by the stream and sea, by the hill and in the woodland, in the

sunlight and free wind, where the wild dove haunts. Walls and roof shut

it off as they shut off the undulation of light. The very lightning

cannot penetrate here. A murkiness marks the coming of the cloud, and

the dome becomes vague, but the fierce flash is shorn to a pale

reflection, and the thunder is no more than the rolling of a heavier

truck loaded with tomes. But in closing out the sky, with it is cut off

all that the sky can tell you with its light, or in its passion of

storm.

Sitting at these long desks and trying to read, I soon find that I have

made a mistake; it is not here I shall find that which I seek. Yet the

magic of books draws me here time after time, to be as often

disappointed. Something in a book tempts the mind as pictures tempt the

eye; the eye grows weary of pictures, but looks again. The mind wearies

of books, yet cannot forget that once when they were first opened in

youth they gave it hope of knowledge. Those first books exhausted,

there is nothing left but words and covers. It seems as if all the

books in the world--really books--can be bought for L10. Man's whole

thought is purchaseable at that small price, for the value of a watch,

of a good dog. For the rest it is repetition and paraphrase. The grains

of wheat were threshed out and garnered two thousand years since.

Except the receipts of chemists, except specifications for the

steam-engine, or the electric motor, there is nothing in these millions

of books that was not known at the commencement of our era. Not a

thought has been added. Continual threshing has widened out the heap of

straw and spread it abroad, but it is empty. Nothing will ever be found

in it. Those original grains of true thought were found beside the

stream, the sea, in the sunlight, at the shady verge of woods. Let us

leave this beating and turning over of empty straw; let us return to

the stream and the hills; let us ponder by night in view of the stars.

It is pleasant to go out again into the portico under the great

columns. On the threshold I feel nearer knowledge than when within. The

sun shines, and southwards above the houses there is a statue crowning

the summit of some building. The figure is in the midst of the light;

it stands out clear and white as if in Italy. The southern blue is

luminous--the beams of light flow through it--the air is full of the

undulation and life of light. There is rest in gazing at the sky: a

sense that wisdom does exist and may be found, a hope returns that was

taken away among the books. The green lawn is pleasant to look at,

though it is mown so ruthlessly. If they would only let the grass

spring up, there would be a thought somewhere entangled in the long

blades as a dewdrop sparkles in their depths. Seats should be placed

here, under the great columns or by the grass, so that one might enjoy

the sunshine after books and watch the pigeons. They have no fear of

the people, they come to my feet, but the noise of a door heavily

swinging-to in the great building alarms them; they rise and float

round, and return again. The sunlight casts a shadow of the pigeon's

head and neck upon his shoulder; he turns his head, and the shadow of

his beak falls on his breast. Iridescent gleams of bronze and green and

blue play about his neck; blue predominates. His pink feet step so

near, the red round his eye is visible. As he rises vertically, forcing

his way in a straight line upwards, his wings almost meet above his

back and again beneath the body; they are put forth to his full stroke.

When his flight inclines and becomes gradually horizontal, the effort

is less and the wing tips do not approach so closely.

They have not laboured in mental searching as we have; they have not

wasted their time looking among empty straw for the grain that is not

there. They have been in the sunlight. Since the days of ancient Greece

the doves have remained in the sunshine; we who have laboured have

found nothing. In the sunshine, by the shady verge of woods, by the

sweet waters where the wild dove sips, there alone will thought be

found.

THE PLAINEST CITY IN EUROPE

The fixed perspective of Paris neither elongates nor contracts with any

change of atmosphere, so that the apparent distance from one point to

another remains always the same. Reduced to the simplest elements the

street architecture of Paris consists of two parallel lines, which to

the eye appear to gradually converge. In sunshine and shade the sides

of the street approach in an unvarying ratio; a cloud goes over, and

the lines do not soften; brilliant light succeeds, and is merely

light--no effect accompanies it. The architecture conquers, and is

always architecture; it resists the sun, the air, the rain, being

without expression. The geometry of the street can never be forgotten.

Moving along it you have merely advanced so far along a perspective,

between the two lines which tutors rule to teach drawing. By-and-by,

when you reach the other end and look back, the perspective is

accurately reversed. This is now the large end of the street, and that

which has been left the small. The houses seen from this end present

precisely the same facade as they did at starting, so that were it not

for the sense of weariness from walking it would be easy to imagine

that no movement had taken place. Each house is exactly the same height

as the next, the windows are of the same pattern, the wooden outer

blinds the same shape; the line of the level roof runs along straight

and unbroken, the chimneys are either invisible or insignificant.

Nothing projects, no bow window, balcony, or gable; the surface is as

flat as well can be. From parapet to pavement the wall descends plumb,

and the glance slips along it unchecked. Each house is exactly the same

colour as the next, white; the wooden outer blinds are all the same

colour, a dull grey; in the windows there are no visible red, or green,

or tapestry curtains, mere sashes. There are no flowers in the windows

to catch the sunlight. The upper storeys have the air of being

uninhabited, as the windows have no curtains whatever, and the wooden

blinds are frequently closed. Two flat vertical surfaces, one on each

side of the street, each white and grey, extend onwards and approach in

mathematical ratio. That is a Parisian street. Go on now to the next

street, and you find precisely the same conditions repeated--the

streets that cross are similar, those that radiate the same. Some are

short, others long, some wide, some narrow; they are all geometry and

white paint. The vast avenues, a rifle-shot across, such as the Avenue

de l'Opera, differ only in width and in the height of the houses. The

monotony of these gigantic houses is too great to be expressed. Then

across the end of the avenue they throw some immense facade--some

public building, an opera-house, a palace, a ministry, anything will

do--in order that you shall see nothing but Paris. Weary of the

gigantic monotony of the gigantic houses, exactly alike, your eye shall

not catch a glimpse of some distant cloud rising like a snowy mountain

(as Japanese artists show the top of Fusiyama); you shall not see the

breadth of the sky, nor even any steeple, tower, dome, or gable; you

shall see nothing but Paris; the avenue is wide enough for the Grand

Army to march down, but the exit to the eye is blocked by this immense

meaningless facade drawn across it. No doubt it is executed in the

"highest style"; in effect it appears a repetition of windows, columns,

and doorways exactly alike, all quite meaningless, for the columns

support nothing, like the fronts sold in boxes of children's toy

bricks. Perhaps on the roof there is some gilding, and you ask yourself

the question why it is there. These facades, of which there are so

many, vary in detail; in effect they are all the same, an utter

weariness to the eye. Every fresh day's research into the city brings

increasing disappointment, a sense of the childish, of feebleness, and

weakness exhibited in public, as if they had built in sugar for the top

of a cake. The level ground will not permit of any advantage of view;

there are none of those sudden views so common and so striking in

English towns. Everything is planed, smoothed, and set to an oppressive

regularity.

Turning round a corner one comes suddenly on a pillar of a dingy, dull

hue, whose outline bulges unpleasantly. In London you would shrug your

shoulders, mutter "hideous!" and pass on. This is the famous Vendome

Column. As for the Column of July, it is so insignificant, so silly (no

other word expresses it so well), that a second glance is carefully

avoided. The Hotel de Ville, a vast white building, is past

description, it is so plain and so repellent in its naked glaring

assertion. From about old Notre Dame they have removed every medieval

outwork which had grown up around and rendered it lifelike; it now

rises perpendicular and abrupt from the white surface of the square.

Unless you had been told that it was the Notre Dame of Victor Hugo you

would not look at its exterior twice. The interior is another matter.

In external form Notre Dame cannot enter into competition with

Canterbury. The barrack-like Hotel des Invalides, the tomb of

Napoleon--was ever a tomb so miserably lacking in all that should

inspire a reverential feeling?

The marble tub in which the urn is sunk, the gilded chapel, and the

yellow windows--could anything be more artificial and less appropriate?

They jar on the senses, they insult the torn flags which were carried

by the veterans at Austerlitz, and which now droop, never again to be

unfurled to the wind of battle. The tiny Seine might as well flow in a

tunnel, being bridged so much. There remains but the Arc de Triomphe,

the only piece of architecture in all modern Paris worth a second look.

Even this is spoiled by the same intolerable artificiality. The

ridiculous sculpture on the face, the figures blowing trumpets, and,

above all, the group on the summit, which the tongue of man cannot

describe, so utterly hideous is it, destroy the noble lines of the

arch, if any one is so imprudent as to approach near it. Receding down

the Avenue Friedland--somewhat aslant--the chestnut trees presently

conceal the side sculpture; and then by tilting one's hat so that the

brim shall hide the group on the summit, it is possible to admire the

proportions of the Arc. In the Tuileries gardens there is a spot where

distance obliterates the sculpture, and the projecting bough of an elm

conceals the group on the top. Here the arch appears noble; but it is

no longer French; it is now merely a copy of a Roman original, which

any of our own architects could erect for us in Hyde Park. For the most

part the vaunted Boulevards are but planted with planes, the least

pleasing of trees, whose leaves present an unvarying green, till they

drop a dead brown; and the horse-chestnuts in the Champs Elysees are

set in straight lines to repeat the geometry of the streets.

Thus central Paris has no character. It is without individuality and

expressionless. Suppose you said, "The human face is really very

irregular; it requires shaping. This nose projects; here, let us

flatten it to the level of the cheek. This mouth curves at the corners;

let us cut it straight. These eyebrows arch; make them straight. This

colour is too flesh-like; bring white paint. Besides, the features

move, they laugh, they assume sadness; this is wrong. Here, divide the

muscles, that they may hence forth remain in unvarying rigidity." That

is what has been done to Paris. It is made straight; it is idealised

after Euclid; it is stiff, wearisome, and feeble. Lastly, it has no

expression. The distances as observed at the commencement remain always

the same, partly because of the obtrusive geometry and the monotony,

partly because of the whiteness, and partly because of the peculiarity

of the atmosphere, for which of course the Parisian is not responsible,

but should have remembered in building. Advantage might surely have

been taken of so clear an air in some manner. The colour and tone, the

light and shade, the change and variety of London are entirely wanting;

in short, Paris is the plainest city in Europe.

End of Project Gutenberg's The Life of the Fields, by Richard Jefferies

The Life of the Fields · 第 16 / 16 段