MANTLINGS.

The first observed instance of a mantling or lambrequin, as it

was then called,--a term still applied to it by the modern French

heralds,--occurs in the large seal of Ralph de Monthermer, Earl of

Gloucester and Hertford, 1299. This is engraved in Nicholas Upton, _De

Usu Militari_ [Bisse edition, 1654, p. 63]. In Planché's _Poursuivant_

the helmet and mantling alone are engraved from this seal. It is

represented as a square handkerchief or shawl fastened at one end

under the crest, and flying out loose behind. There is no hacking (see

No. 62). Ralph de Monthermer was a "plain esquire," but attracted the

attention and secured the love of Joan of Acres, daughter of Edward I.

and relict of Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester. May we be allowed

to fancy we see here the kerchief of the fair lady whose favour led

to his advancement, and whose marriage eventually brought him his

title? His second wife was also a widow, namely, the relict of John de

Hastings and sister of Aymer de Valence, Earl of Pembroke.

In Planché's _Poursuivant_ is engraved another very similar, from

the seal of Thomas, Earl of Lancaster (see No. 63). He was beheaded

by Edward II. (1321). This seems to be of some thick material and

bordered. It is better shown in the full-sized engraving in Sandford's

_Genealogical History_, p. 102. Boutell (_Heraldry_, p. 212) describes

No. 64 as a "contoise," and says it was used until the middle of the

fourteenth century. These seem to have been stiff to stand out, but

I have not found representations of any more of them. Mr. Boutell

refers to two effigies showing them in Exeter Cathedral, and another

in Westminster Abbey. In the seal of John de Tilneye to a deed, 1353

[engraved in the _Visit. Hunts._, p. 29], a voluminous and square

folded mantling, without any hacks, is extended out to the inscription

on each side, and is fixed under a broad-brimmed hat which stands

on the top of the helm, and on this hat is the crest, viz., a tree

supported by two lions gambs. There is another instance on the monument

at Norton Brize, Oxfordshire, to John Daubygné, 1346, where the

mantling is extended out square in folds, without any hacking, and

hangs on each side of the helmet, while below is placed the shield.

This is engraved in Boutell's _Heraldry_, p. 156 (see No. 65). Another

such squarely-folded and unhacked mantle is shown on the seal of

Elizabeth de Lucy, 1354, with a man's helmet and crest (!!)--see No.

66--and yet another in that of Sir William de Lucy, 1392. Both of these

are engraved in Nicholas Upton, p. 73 (see No. 67). But these must all

be taken as rare exceptions. Usually mantlings of so early a date as

the fourteenth century are of very small dimensions, hacked and lying

close on their helmets, clinging to them, as it were, and so fastened

under the crest that they could not hang otherwise. As we see in the

seal of Richard, Earl of Arundel, about 1350-70 (illustrated at p. 27),

also in the seals of Sir Thomas Bysshe, 1381 [Nicholas Upton, p. 53],

see No. 68; and in that of John de Clinton, 1386 [Nicholas Upton, p.

82], see No. 69; but seals of the fourteenth century more commonly show

no mantlings: they were only just beginning to be introduced.

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

At the beginning of the fifteenth century the same small hacked

mantlings, hanging closely upon their helmets, still continue, and

become the rule; it was the exception to have any mantling at all in

the fourteenth. About 1420, however, they begin to spread over the

field of the seal, in free and bold curves and waves. In the seal of

John, Lord Clinton de Say, 1438 (No. 54), and in that of Humphrey,

Earl of Stafford and Perche, 1438, both engraved _Archæologia_, vol.

xxxviii, p. 272, they are seen hacked, wandering away from the helm,

and half way down the shield. But a noteworthy characteristic of

the mantlings of this early date, and one to which I must draw your

particular attention, is that, although stretching their arms boldly

about the field, and in MSS. where space will allow, they may extend

down below the base of the shield, they are not, perhaps never, seen

to _hide themselves behind it_! The spirit of those old times when the

mantling would probably be the gift of some fair lady, perhaps her

kerchief or mantle, and borne with chivalrous fervour through the many

adventures in which the knight of those days sought to gain fame and

experience--this spirit of honouring the mantlet still remained burning

brightly; a fold was therefore too precious to be hidden behind the

shield. When we come to consider such decorations in later times, when

such sentiment had departed, you will see why [beyond the valuable

indication of date supplied] I have drawn your attention particularly

to this peculiarity to be noted in the fifteenth century. The seal of

Thomas Strange, 1419, shows a curious arrangement of mantling. This is

engraved in _Miscell. Genealogica et Heraldica_, 1884, p. 59. In the

very curious and interesting seal of Sir John Pelham, 1469, engraved

in _Archæological Journal_, vol. vii, p. 323, and already illustrated

on p. 32, the field of the seal is filled up with bold contortions of

the hacked mantling, while on the helmet appears the most extraordinary

crest--a large birdcage which is higher than the helmet itself; it is

divided into three tiers of wickerwork, and has a pointed roof, while

on the field appear two buckles. Sir John Pelham, at Poictiers in

1356, personally assisted at the capture of the French King, when the

honorary distinction of the buckle as a family badge was accorded to

him. His descendants sometimes used the birdcage crest, in remembrance

of the same exploit and the imprisoned king.

In illuminations of this date, say of the latter half of the fifteenth

century, we see the same characters--the mantlings so divided into

narrow ribbon-like folds, much hacked and twisted to show the lining,

and thrown out into bold arms around the shield and extending some

way below it with fine artistic effect. I would refer to the grant of

arms to the Fellowship of Ironmongers of London, 1st September, 1455,

already illustrated on p. 35, also to the shield of Edward IV., 1460,

in Willement's _Regal Heraldry_. There are also two beautiful specimens

engraved in Boutell's _Brasses_; one, the stall plate at Windsor of Sir

Humphrey Stafford, K.G., 1460, at p. 219 (see No. 70), and at p. 207

the brass of Sir William Say, at Broxbourne, Herts, 1473 (see No. 71):

the mantling in the last ends in four tassels; this addition of tassels

becomes the ordinary usage in the MS. illuminations and in grants of

arms, but not in seals of the sixteenth century.

I refer to No. 72 for the lithograph of that very curious mantling

carved in stone at Wyverton, Nottinghamshire (Thoroton's _History_,

p. 98), which displays _three_ tassels. This stands with two other

helmets, each over its respective shield of heraldry, and on

examination I am able to declare their date to be about 1440-50.

Licence of free warren and to make a park here was granted 24 Henry VI.

(1445), at which time Thoroton supposes this house was built.

Following our entirely different lines of enquiry, I am able to state,

to within twenty or thirty years, the date of these carvings; and I

would further say that as to one of the quarterings displayed, the

Chaworth family did not inherit the right to bear it until 1422; thus

confirming very exactly Thoroton's date.

Perhaps the first appearance of a tassel on a mantling is on a monument

to -- Harsyck in Southacre Church, Norfolk, 1384; engraved in Boutell's

_Heraldry_, plate I (see No. 73). This is also interesting as being a

very early example of the wreath or torse which supports the crest,

consisting of a twisted cord of silk of two colours. In a brass to Sir

Hugh Hastings, at Elsing, co. Norfolk, 1347, the same is shown. In

the effigy of Sir Richard Pembruge, 1375, now in the nave of Hereford

Cathedral, the crest and helmet are attached with a wreath of leaves,

above which rises a great panache of feathers.

The earliest instance of a _date_ upon the face of a shield is said to

occur about the middle of the thirteenth century, but such are very

uncommon until the sixteenth century, when they are found both on

personal and official seals.

The inscriptions on English seals of this fifteenth century are almost

universally in Latin and in Gothic lettering. I have, so far, only

noted one seal with Roman letters, and that occurs in 1403.

The Dates of Variously-shaped Shields, with Coincident Dates and Examples · 第 10 / 53 题