HERODOTUS

Greek historical literature follows the same course of development as

Greek poetry; it begins in epic form in Ionia and ends in dramatic type

at Athens.

Herodotus, "the father of History", was born at Halicarnassus in Asia

Minor about 484 B.C. He travelled widely over the East, Egypt, North

Africa and Greece. He was acquainted with the Sophoclean circle, joined

the Athenian colony at Thurii in South Italy and died there before the

end of the century. His subject was the defeat of the Persian attack on

Greece and falls into three main divisions. In the first three books he

tells how Persian power was consolidated: in the next three he shows how

it flooded Russia, Thrace and Greece, being stemmed at Marathon in 490;

the last three contain the story of its final shattering at Salamis

and Plataea in 480 and of the Greek recoil on Asia in 479. It is thus a

"triple wave of woes" familiar to Greek thought. His dialect is Ionic,

which he adopted because it was the language of narrative poetry and

prose.

His introduction leads at once into Romance; he intends to preserve the

memory of the wonderful deeds of Greeks and Barbarians, the cause of

their quarrel being the abductions of women, Io, Europe, Medea, Helen. A

more recent aggressor was Croesus, King of Lydia, who attacked the Greek

seaboard. The earlier reigns of Lydian kings are recounted in a series

of striking narratives. Gyges was the owner of the famous magic

ring which made its possessor invisible. His policy of expansion was

continued by his son and grandson. But Croesus, his great-grandson, was

the wealthiest of all, extending his realm from as far as the Halys, the

boundary of Cyrus' Persian Empire. Solon's famous but fictitious warning

to him to "wait till the end comes before deciding whether he had

been happy" left him unmoved. Soon clouds began to gather. A pathetic

misadventure robbed him of his son; the growing power of Persia alarmed

him and he applied to Delphi for advice. The oracle informed him that

if he crossed the Halys he would ruin a mighty Empire and suggested

alliance with the strongest state in Greece. Finding that Athens

was still torn by political struggles consequent upon the romantic

banishments and restorations of Peisistratus, he joined with Sparta

which had just overcome a powerful rival, Tegea in Arcadia.

Croesus crossed the Halys in 554. After fighting an indecisive battle

he retired to his capital Sardis. Cyrus unexpectedly pursued him. The

Lydian cavalry stampeded, the horses being terrified by the sight and

odour of the Persian camel corps. Croesus shut himself up in Sardis

which he thought impregnable. An excellent story tells how the Persians

scaled the most inaccessible part of the fortress. Croesus was put on a

pyre and there remembered the words of Solon. Cyrus, dreading a similar

revolution of fortune, tried in vain to save him from the burning

faggots; the fire was too fierce for his men to quench, but Apollo heard

Croesus' prayer and sent a rainstorm which saved him. Being reproached

by the fallen monarch who had poured treasure into his temple, Apollo

replied that he had staved off ruin for three full years, but could not

prevail against Fate; besides, Croesus should have asked whose Empire he

was to destroy; at least Apollo had delivered him from death. The Lydian

portion ends with a graphic description of laws, customs and monuments.

The rise of Persia is next described. Assyria, whose capital was

Nineveh, was destroyed by Cyaxares of Media, whose capital was Ecbatana.

His son Astyages in consequence of a dream married his daughter Mandané

to a Persian named Cambyses. A second dream made him resolve to

destroy her child Cyrus who, like Oedipus, was saved from exposure by a

herdsman. Later, on learning Cyrus' identity, Astyages punished Harpagus

whom he had bidden to remove the child. Harpagus sowed mutiny in the

Median army, giving the victory to the Persians in 558. Cyrus proceeded

to attack the Asiatic Greeks, of whom the Phocaeans left their home

to found new states in Corsica and Southern Gaul; the other cities

surrendered. Babylon was soon the only city in Asia not subject to

Persia. Cyrus diverted the course of the Euphrates and entered the town

in 538. In an attack on Tomyris, queen of a Scythian race, Cyrus was

defeated and slain in 529.

His son Cambyses determined to invade Egypt, the eternal rival of the

Mesopotamian kings. Herodotus devotes his second book to a description

of the marvels of Egypt, through which he travelled as far as

Elephantiné on the border of Ethiopia. He opens with a plain proof that

Egypt is not the most ancient people, for some children were kept apart

during their first two years, nobody being allowed to speak with them.

They were then heard to say distinctly the word "bekos" which was

Phrygian for "bread". This evidence of Phrygian antiquity satisfied even

the Egyptians.

In this second book there is hardly a single leading feature of Egyptian

civilisation which is not discussed. The Nile is the life of the

land; being anxious to solve the riddle of its annual rise, Herodotus

dismisses as unreasonable the theory that the water is produced by the

melting snow, for the earth becomes hotter as we proceed further

south, and there cannot be snow where there is intense heat. The sun is

deflected from its course in winter, which derangement causes the river

to run shallow in that season. The religious practice of the land are

well described, including the process of embalming; oracles, animals,

medicine, writing, dress are all treated. He notes that in Egyptian

records the sun has twice risen in the west and twice set in the east.

A long list of dynasties is relieved with many an excellent story,

notably the very famous account of how Rhampsonitis lost his treasures

and failed to find the robber until he offered him a free pardon; having

found him he said the Egyptians excelled all the world in wisdom, and

the robber all the Egyptians. The Pyramids are described; transmigration

is discussed and emphasis is laid upon the growing popularity of Greek

mercenaries. The book closes with the brilliant reign of Amasis, who

made overtures to the Greek oracles, allied himself with Samos and

permitted the foundation of an important Greek colony at Naucratis.

The third book opens with the invasion of Egypt by Cambyses in 525 on

account of an insult offered him by Amasis. A Greek mercenary named

Phanes gave the Persians information of the one means of attacking

through the desert. After a fierce battle at Pelusium Egypt was beaten;

for years afterwards skulls of both armies lay around, the Persian heads

being easily broken by a pebble, the Egyptian scarcely breakable by

stones. In victory Cambyses outraged Psammenitus, the defeated King; a

fruitless expedition against Ethiopia and the Ammonians followed. The

Egyptians were stirred by the arrival of their calf-god Apis; Cambyses

mockingly wounded him and was punished with madness, slaying his own

kindred and committing deeds of impiety.

At that time Egypt was leagued with the powerful island of Samos, ruled

by Polycrates, a tyrant of marvellous good fortune. Suspecting some

coming disaster to balance it, Amasis urged him to sacrifice his dearest

possession to avert the evil eye. Polycrates threw his ring into the

sea; it was retrieved by a fisherman. On hearing this, Amasis severed

his alliance.

In the absence of Cambyses two Magi brothers stirred up revolt in Susa,

one pretending to be Smerdis, the murdered brother of Cambyses. That

monarch wounded himself in the thigh as he mounted his horse. The wound

festered and caused speedy death. Meanwhile the false Smerdis held the

sovereignty. He was suspected by Otanes, a noble whose daughter Phaedymé

was married to him. At great personal risk she discovered that the King

was without ears, a manifest proof that he was a Magian. Otane thens

joined with six other conspirators to put the usurper down. Darius, son

of Hystaspes, warned them that their numbers were too large for secrecy,

advising immediate action. The two pretenders had meanwhile persuaded

Prexaspes, a confidant of Cambyses, to assure the Persians that Smerdis

really ruled. Prexaspes told the truth and then threw himself to death

from the city walls. This news forced the conspirators' hands; rushing

into the palace, they were luckily able to slay the usurpers.

The next question was, who should reign? Herodotus turned these Persians

into Greeks, making them discuss the comparative merits of monarchy,

oligarchy and democracy. They decided that their horses should choose

the next king; he whose steed should first neigh should rule. Darius had

a cunning groom named Oebares; that evening he took the horse and his

mare into the market-place; next morning on reaching the same spot the

horse did not fail to seat his master on the throne in 521. A review of

the Persian Empire follows, with a description of India and Arabia.

Polycrates did not long survive. He was the first Greek to conceive

the idea of a maritime empire. He was foully murdered by the Persian

Oroetes, who decoyed him to the mainland by an offer of treasure and

then crucified him. In the retinue of Polycrates was a physician,

Democedes of Croton, who was captured by Oroetes. His fame spread to

Susa at a time when no court doctor could treat Darius' sprained foot.

Democedes was sent for and effected the cure; later he healed the

Queen Atossa of a boil. Instructed by him she advised Darius to send

a commission of fifteen Persians to spy out the Greek mainland under

Democedes' guidance. After an exciting series of adventures the

physician succeeded in returning to his native city. But the idea of an

invasion of Greece had settled on Darius' mind. First, however, he took

Samos, giving it to Syloson, Polycrates' brother who years before in

Egypt had made him a present of a scarlet cloak while he was a mere

guardsman. Darius consolidated his power in Asia by the capture of the

revolted province of Babylon through the self-sacrifice of Zopyrus, son

of one of the seven conspirators. The vivid story of his devotion is one

of the very greatest things in Herodotus.

Persia being thus mistress of all Asia, of Samos and the seaboard,

began to dream of subduing Greece itself. But first Darius determined to

conquer his non-Greek neighbours. The fourth book describes the attack

which Darius himself led against the Scythians in revenge for the

twenty-eight years' slavery they inflicted on the Medes. A description

of Scythia is relieved by an account of the circumnavigation of Africa

by the Phoenicians and the voyage of Scylax down the Indus and along the

coast of Africa to Egypt.

The war on the Scyths was dramatic and exciting, both sides acting in

the spirit of chivalry. Crossing the Bosporus, Darius advanced through

Thrace to the Danube which he spanned with a bridge. The Scyths adopted

the favourite Russian plan of retreating into the interior, destroying

the crops and hovering round the foe; they further led the Persians

into the territories of their own enemies. This process at last wearied

Darius; he sent a herald to challenge them to a straight contest or to

become his vassals. The reply came that if Darius wished a conflict

he had better outrage their ancestral tombs; as for slavery, they

acknowledged only Zeus as their master. But the threat of slavery did

its work. A detachment was sent to the Danube to induce the Ionian

Greeks to strike for freedom by breaking down the bridge they were

guarding, thus cutting off Darius' retreat. To the King himself a

Scythian herald brought a present of a bird, a mouse, a frog and five

arrows, implying that unless his army became one of the creatures it

would perish by the arrows. The Scyths adopted guerilla tactics, leaving

the Persians no rest by night and offering no battle by day. At last

Darius began his retreat. One division of the Scythian horsemen reached

the bridge before their foes, again asking the Ionians to destroy it.

The Greeks pretended to consent, breaking down the Scythian end of it.

Darius at last came to the place; to his dismay he found the bridge

demolished. He bade an Egyptian Stentor summon Histiaeus, the Greek

commandant, who brought up the fleet and saved the Persian host which

retired into Asia.

In 509 a second expedition was dispatched against Barca, a colony of

Cyrene. The history of the latter is graphically described, the first

king being Battus, the Stammerer, who founded it in obedience to

the directions of Apollo. Cyrene was brought under Cambyses' sway

by Arcesilaus who had been banished. He misinterpreted an oracle and

cruelly killed his enemies in Barca. When he was assassinated in that

town his mother Pheretima fled from the metropolis Cyrene to Aryandes,

the Persian governor in Egypt. Backed by armed force she besieged Barca

which resisted bravely for nine months; at the end of that term an

agreement was made that Barca should pay tribute and remain unassailed

as long as the ground remained firm on which the treaty was made. But

the Persians had undermined the spot, covering planks of wood with a

loose layer of earth. Breaking down the planks they rushed in and took

the town, Pheretima exacting a horrible vengeance. Yet she herself died

soon after, eaten of worms. "Thus," remarks the historian, "do men, by

too severe vengeances, draw upon their own heads the divine wrath."

The fifth book begins the concentration on purely Greek history. Darius

had left Megabazus in command in Europe, retiring himself to Sardis. In

that city he was much struck by the appearance of a Paeonian woman and

ordered Megabazus to invade the country. He subdued it and Macedonia in

506-4, but in the process some of his commanders were punished for an

insult to Macedonian women, revenge being taken by Alexander, son of

King Amyntas; a bride shut the lips of a party sent to discover their

fate. In Thrace, Megabazus began to suspect Histiaeus, the Ionian who

had saved Darius and in return had been given a strong town, Myrcinus on

the River Strymon. The King by a trick drew Histiaeus to Sardis and

took him to the Capital, leaving his brother Artaphernes as governor

in Sardis. But Histiaeus had been succeeded in Miletus by his nephew

Aristagoras; to him in 502 came certain nobles from Naxos, one of the

Cyclades isles, begging restoration from banishment. He decided to apply

to Artaphernes for Persian help; this the viceroy willingly gave as it

would further the Persian progress to the objective, the Greek mainland,

across the Aegean in a direct line. The Persian admiral Megabates soon

quarrelled with Aristagoras about the command and informed the Naxians

of the coming attack. The expedition thus failed. Aristagoras, afraid

to face Artaphemes whose treasure he had wasted, decided on raising a

revolt of the whole of Ionia; at that very moment a slave came to him

from his uncle in Susa with a message tattooed on his head, bidding him

rebel.

Aristagoras first applied to Sparta for aid. When arguments failed, he

tried to bribe the king Cleomenes. In the room was the King's little

daughter Gorgo. Hearing Aristagoras gradually raise his offer from ten

to fifty talents, the child said, "Father, depart, or the stranger will

corrupt thee". Aristagoras received a better welcome at Athens. That

city in 510 had expelled Hippias, the tyrant son of Peisistratus, who

appealed to Artaphernes for aid. Hearing this, the Athenians sent an

embassy asking the satrap not to assist the exile, but the answer was

that if they wished to survive, they must receive their ruler back.

Aristagoras therefore found the Athenians in a fit frame of mind to

listen. They lent him a fleet of twenty sail and marched with him to

Sardis which they captured and burned in 501. The revolt speedily spread

over all the Asiatic sea-coast. On hearing of the Athenians for the

first time, Darius directed a slave to say to him thrice a day, "Sire,

remember the Athenians". He summoned Histiaeus and accused him of

complicity in the revolt, but Histiaeus assured him of his loyalty and

obtained permission to go to the coast. Meanwhile the Persians took

strong action against the rebels, subduing many towns and districts. The

book ends with the flight of Aristagoras to Myrcinus and his death in

battle against the Thracians in 496.

The next book opens with the famous accusation of Histiaeus by

Artaphernes: "Thou hast stitched this boot and Aristagoras hath put

it on." Histiaeus in fear fled to his own city Miletus; being disowned

there, he for a time maintained a life of privateering, but was

eventually captured and crucified by Artaphernes. The Ionian revolt had

been narrowed down to Miletus and one or two less important towns. The

Greeks assembled a fleet, but a spirit of insubordination manifesting

itself they were defeated at sea in the battle of Lade in 495. Next year

Miletus fell but was treated with mercy. At Athens the news caused the

greatest consternation; a dramatic poet named Phrynichus ventured to

stage the disaster; the people wept and fined him a thousand talents,

forbidding any similar presentation in future. Stamping out the last

embers of revolt in Asia the Persians coasted along Thrace; before

their advance the great Athenian Miltiades was compelled to fly from the

Dardanelles to his native city. In 492 Mardonius was appointed viceroy

of Asia Minor. He reorganised the provincial system and then attempted

to double the perilous promontory of Athos, but only a remnant of his

forces returned to Asia.

Next year Darius sent to all the Greek cities demanding earth and water,

the tokens of submission. The islanders obeyed including Aegina, the

deadly foe of Athens. A protest made by the latter led to a war between

the two states in which Athens was worsted. Sparta itself had just been

torn by an internal dissension between two claimants of the throne, one

of whom named Demaratus had been ejected and later fled to the Persian

court. The great expedition of 490 sailed straight across the Aegean,

commanded by Datis and Artaphernes. Their primary objective was Eretria

in Euboea, a city which had assisted the Ionians in their revolt. The

town was speedily betrayed, the inhabitants being carried aboard the

Persian fleet. Guided by Hippias the armament landed at the bay of

Marathon, twenty-five miles from Athens. A vain appeal was sent to

Sparta for succours; Athens, supported by the little Boeotian city of

Plataea, was left to cope with the might of Persia.

It was fortunate that the Athenians could command the services of

Miltiades who had already had some experience of the Persian methods of

attack. The details of the great battle that followed depend upon the

sole authority of Herodotus among the Greek writers. Many difficulties

are caused by his narrative, but it seems certain that Miltiades was

in command on the day on which the battle was actually fought. He

apparently clung to the hills overlooking the plain and bay of Marathon

until the Persian cavalry were unable to act. Seizing the opportunity,

he led his men down swiftly to the combat; his centre which had been

purposely weakened was thrust back but the two wings speedily proved

victorious, then converged to assist the centre, finally driving the foe

to the sea where a desperate conflict took place. The Persians succeeded

in embarking and promptly sailed round the coast to Athens, but seeing

the victors in arms before the town they sailed back to Asia. The

Spartan reinforcements which arrived too late for the battle viewed the

Persian dead and returned after praising the Athenians.

A slight digression tells the amusing story how the Athenian

Hippocleides in his cups lost the hand of the princess of Sicyon because

he danced on his head and waved his legs about, shouting that he didn't

care. The great victor Miltiades did not long survive his glory. His

attempt to reduce the island of Paros, which had sided with Persia,

completely failed. Returning to Athens he was condemned and fined,

shortly after dying of a mortified thigh.

In the third portion Herodotus gradually rises to his greatest height

of descriptive power. Darius resolved on a larger expedition to reduce

Greece. He made preparations for three years, then a revolt in Egypt

delayed his plans and his career was cut short by death in 485. His

successor Xerxes was disinclined to invade Europe, but was overborne by

Mardonius his cousin. A canal was dug across the peninsula of Athos, a

bridge was built over the Hellespont, and provisions were collected. A

detailed account of the component forces is given, special mention being

made of Artemisia, Queen of Herodotus' own city, who was to win great

glory in the campaign. The army marched over the Hellespont and along

the coast, the fleet supporting it; advancing through Thessaly, it

reached the pass of Thermopylae, opposite Euboea, in 480.

On the Greek side was division; the Spartans imagined that their duty

was to save the Peloponnese only; they were eager to build a wall across

the isthmus of Corinth, leaving the rest of Greece to its fate. But

Athens had produced another genius named Themistocles. Shortly before

the invasion the silver mines at Laureium in Attica had yielded a

surplus; he persuaded the city to use it for building a fleet of two

hundred sail to be directed against Aegina. When the Athenians got an

oracle from Delphi which stated that they would lose their land but be

saved by their wooden walls, he interpreted the oracle as referring to

the fleet. Under his management the city built more ships. The Council

of Greece held at the Isthmus of Corinth decided that an army should

defend Thermopylae while the fleet supported it close by at Artemisium.

The Persian fleet had been badly battered in a storm as it sailed

along the coast of Magnesia, nearly four hundred sail foundering; the

remainder reached safe anchorage in the Malian gulf, further progress

being impossible till the Greek navy was beaten or retired.

At Thermopylae the advance-guard was composed of Spartans led by

Leonidas who determined to defend the narrow pass. A Persian spy brought

the news to Xerxes that this small body of warriors were combing their

hair. The King sent for Demaratus, the ex-Spartan monarch, who assured

him that this was proof that the Spartans intended to fight to the

death. After a delay of four days the fight began. The Spartans

routed all their opponents including the famous Immortals, the Persian

bodyguard. At length a traitor Ephialtes told Xerxes of a path across

the mountains by which Leonidas could be taken in the rear. Learning

from deserters and fugitives that he had been betrayed, Leonidas

dismissed the main body, himself advancing into the open. After winning

immortal glory he and his men were destroyed and the way to Greece lay

open to the invader.

In three naval engagements off Artemisium the Greek fleet showed its

superiority; a detachment of two hundred sail had been sent round the

island of Euboea to block up the exit of the channel through which the

Greek navy had to retreat, but a storm totally destroyed this force.

When the army retreated from Thermopylae the Greek ships were obliged

to retire to the Isthmus; in spite of much opposition the Athenians

compelled Eurybiades the Spartan admiral to take up his station at

Salamis, whither the Persian navy followed. Their army had advanced

through Boeotia, attacking Delphi on the way. The story was told how

Apollo himself defended his shrine, hurling down rocks on the invaders

and sending supernatural figures to discomfit them. Entering Attica the

barbarian host captured a deserted Athens, Xerxes sending the glad news

to his subjects in the Persian capital.

The Greeks were with difficulty persuaded not to abandon the sea

altogether. Themistocles was bitterly opposed in his naval policy by

Adeimantus, the Corinthian; it was only by threatening to leave Greece

with their fleet that the Athenians were able to bring the allies

to reason. By a stroke of cunning Themistocles forced their hands; a

messenger went to Xerxes with news of the Greek intention to retreat; on

hearing this the Persians during the night blocked up the passages round

Salamis and landed some of their best troops on a little island called

Psyttaleia. The news of this encircling movement was brought to the

allies by Aristides, a celebrated Athenian who was in exile, and was

confirmed by a Tenian ship which deserted from the Persians. Next

morning the Greeks sailed down the strait to escape the blockade and

soon the famous battle began. Among the brave deeds singled out for

special mention none was bolder than that of Artemisia who sank a friend

to escape capture. The remainder of the Persian captains had no chance

of resisting, being huddled up in a narrow channel. Seeing Artemisia's

courage Xerxes remarked that his men had become women, his women men.

The rout of the invaders was quickly completed, the chief glory being

won by Aegina and Athens; the victory was consummated by the slaughter

of the troops on Psyttaleia. The Persian monarch sent tidings of this

defeat to his capital and in terror of a revolt in Ionia decided to

retreat, leaving Mardonius in command of picked troops. He hurriedly

passed along the way he had come, almost disappearing from Herodotus'

story.

Mardonius accompanied him to Thessaly and Macedonia; he sent Alexander,

King of the latter country, as an envoy to Athens, offering to rebuild

the temples and restore all property in exchange for an alliance.

Hearing the news the Spartans in fear for themselves sent a

counter-embassy. The Athenian reply is one of the great things in

historical literature. "It was a base surmise in men like the Spartans

who know our mettle. Not all the gold in the world would tempt us

to enslave our own countrymen. We have a common brotherhood with

all Greeks, a common language, common altars and sacrifices, common

nationality; it would be unseemly to betray these. We thank you for your

offer to support our ruined families, but we will bear our calamities as

we may and will not burden you. Lead out your troops; face the enemy in

Boeotia and there give him battle."

The last book relates the consequences of the Athenian reply to

Alexander. Mardonius advanced rapidly to Athens, which he captured a

second time. The Spartans were busy keeping the feast of Hyacinthia;

only an Athenian threat to come to terms with the foe prevailed on them

to move. Mardonius soon evacuated Attica, the ground being too stony for

cavalry, and encamped near Plataea. The Greeks followed, taking the high

ground on Mount Cithaeron. A brave exploit of the Athenian infantry in

defeating cavalry heartened the whole army. After eleven days' inaction,

Mardonius determined to attack, news of his plan being brought secretly

at night to the Athenians by Alexander. The Spartans, afraid of facing

the Persians, exchanged places with the Athenians; when this movement

was discovered by Mardonius, he sent a challenge to the Spartans to

decide the battle by a single conflict between them and his Persian

division. Receiving no reply, he let his cavalry loose on the Greeks

who began to retire to a place called the Island, where horse could not

operate. This action took place during the night. When morning broke the

battle began. The Persian wicker shields could not resist their enemies'

weapons; the host fled and after Mardonius fell was slaughtered in

heaps. The Greek took vengeance on the Thebans who had acted with the

Persians, of whom a mere remnant reached Asia under the command of

Artabazus.

The victorious Greek fleet had advanced as far as Delos, commanded by

Leotychides, a Spartan of royal blood. To them came an embassy from

Samos, urging an attack on the Persians encamped on Mycale. It is said

that the battle was fought on the same day as that of Plataea and that a

divine rumour ran through the Greek army that their brothers had gained

the day. In the action at Mycale the Athenians took the palm of valour,

bursting the enemy's line and storming his entrenchments. This victory

freed Ionia; it remained only to open the Dardanelles. The Spartans

returned home, but the Athenians crossed from Abydos in Asia to Sestos,

the strongest fortress in the district. The place was starved into

surrender; with its capture ends the story of Persia's attempt to

destroy European civilisation.

In this great Epic nothing is more obvious than the terror the Greeks

felt when they first faced the Persians. The numbers arrayed against

them were overwhelming, their despondency was justifiable. It required

no little courage from a historian to tell the awkward truth--that

Herodotus did tell it is no small testimony to his veracity. Yet only

a little experience was needed to convince the Greeks that they were

superior on both land and sea. Once the lesson was learned, they never

forgot it. Mycale is the proof that they remembered it well. This

same consciousness of superiority animated two other Greek armies, one

deserted in the middle of Asia Minor, yet led unmolested by Xenophon

through a hostile country to the shores of the Black Sea--the other

commanded by Alexander the Great who planted Greek civilisation over

every part of his conquests, from the coast to the very gates of Persia

itself.

Modern history seems to have lost all powers of interesting its readers.

It is as dull as political economy; it suspects a stylist, questions

the accuracy of its authorities, tends to minimise personal influence

on events, specialises on a narrow period, emphasises constitutional

development, insists on the "economic interpretation" of an age and

at times seems quite unable to manage with skill the vast stores

of knowledge on which it draws. To it Herodotus is often a butt for

ridicule; his credulity, inability to distinguish true causes, belief

in divine influences, love of anecdote and chronological vagueness are

serious blemishes. But to us Herodotus is literature; we believe that

he himself laughs slyly at some of the anecdotes he has rendered more

piquant by a pretended credulity; this quick-witted Greek would find

it paid him to assume innocence in order to get his informers (like his

critics) to go on talking. Like Froissart, Joinville, de Comines and

perhaps even like Macaulay he wishes to write what will charm as well as

what will instruct.

Yet as a historian Herodotus is great; he sifts evidence, some of

which he mentions only to reject it; the substantial accuracy of his

statements has been borne out by inscriptions; in fact, his value

to-day is greater than it was last century. If a man's literary bulk

is measured by the greatness of his subject, Herodotus cannot be a

mean writer. His theme is nothing less than the history of civilisation

itself as far as he could record it; his broad sweep of narrative may

be taken to represent the wide speculation of a philosophic historian as

opposed to the narrower and more intense examination of a short period

which is characteristic of the scientific historian. He tells us of

the first actual armed conflict between East and West, the never-ending

eternally romantic story. As Persia fought Greece, so Rome subdued

Carthage, Crusader attacked Saladin, Turkey submerged half Europe,

Russia contended with Japan. The atmosphere of Herodotus is the

unchanging East of the Bible, inscrutable Egypt, prehistoric Russia,

barbarous Thrace, as well as civilised Greece, Africa, India; had he

never written, much information would have been irretrievably lost,

for example, the account of one of the "Fifteen decisive battles" in

history. Let him be judged not as a candidate for some Chair of Ancient

History in some modern University, but as the greatest writer of the

greatest prose-epic in the greatest literature of antiquity.

Of his inimitable short stories it is difficult to speak with measured

praise; it is dangerous to quote them, they are so perfect that a word

added or omitted might spoil them. His so-called digressions have always

some cogent reason in them; they are his means of including in the

panorama a scene essential to its completeness. The narrow type of

history writing has been tried for some centuries; all that it seems

able to accomplish is to go on narrowing itself until it cannot enjoy

for recording or remembering. It is a refreshing experience to move

in the broad open regions of history in which Herodotus trod. If it

is impossible to combine accurate research with the ecstasy of pure

literature, be it so. Herodotus will be read with joy and laughter

and sometimes with tears when some of our modern historians have been

superseded by persons even duller than themselves.

Authors of Greece · 第 29 / 38 题