CHAPTER IX

NO PARTICULAR DATE

Balzac's portrait as described by Gautier--His character--Belief

in magnetism and somnambulism--His attempts to become deputy--His

political and religious views.

In the Salon of 1837 appeared a portrait of Balzac by Boulanger,[*] of

which Theophile Gautier gave the following description in _La Presse_:

"M. de Balzac is not precisely beautiful. His features are irregular;

he is fat and short. Here is a summary which does not seem to lend

itself to a painting, but this is only the reverse of the medal. The

life and ardour reflected in the whole face give it a special beauty.

[*] See the chapter entitled "Un Portrait" in "Autour de Honore de

Balzac," by the Vicomte de Spoelberch de Lovenjoul.

"In this portrait, M. de Balzac, enveloped in the large folds of a

monk's habit, sits with his arms crossed, in a calm and strong

attitude; the neck is uncovered, the look firm and direct; the light,

shining from above, illumines the satin-like smoothness of the upper

parts of the forehead, and throws a bright light on the bumps of

imagination and humour, which are strongly developed in M. de Balzac;

the black hair, also lit up, shining and radiant, comes from the

temples in bright waves, and gives singular light to the top of the

head; the eyes steeped in a golden penumbra with tawny eyeballs, on a

moist and blue crystalline lens like that of a child, send out a

glance of astonishing acuteness; the nose, divided into abrupt

polished flat places, breathes strongly and passionately, through

large red nostrils; the mouth, large and voluptuous, particularly in

the lower lip, smiles with a rabelaisian smile under the shade of a

moustache much lighter in colour than the hair; and the chin, slightly

raised, is attached to the throat by a fold of flesh, ample and

strong, which resembles the dewlap of a young bull. The throat itself

is of athletic and rare strength, the plump full cheeks are touched

with the vermilion of nervous health, and all the flesh tints are

resplendent with the most joyful and reassuring brilliancy.

"In this monk's and soldier's head there is a mixture of reflection

and of good-humour, of resolution and of high spirits, which is

infinitely rare; the thinker and good liver melt into each other with

quaint harmony. Put a cuirass on this large breast, and you will have

one of those fat German foot-soldiers so jovially painted by Terburg.

With the monks' habit, it is Jean des Entommeurs[*]; nevertheless, do

not forget that the eyes throw, through all this embonpoint and

good-humour, the yellow look of a lion to counteract this Flemish

familiarity. Such a man would be equal to excesses of the table, of

pleasure, and of work. We are no longer astonished at the immense

quantity of volumes published by him in so short a time. This

prodigious labour has left no trace of fatigue on the strong cheeks

dappled with red, and on the large white forehead. The enormous work

which would have crushed six ordinary authors under its weight is

hardly the third of the monument he wishes to raise."

[*] One of the characters in Rabelais.

The original of this portrait was sent to Madame Hanska at

Wierzchownia; but a sketch of it belongs to M. Alexandre Dumas the

younger, and has often been engraved. From this, it seems as though

Theophile Gautier must have read his knowledge of Balzac's character

as a whole into his interpretation of the picture. To the ordinary

observer, Boulanger's portrait represents Balzac as the thinker,

worker, and fighter, stern and strenuous; not the delightful comrade

who inspired joy and merriment, and the recollection of whom made

Heine smile on his death-bed. The wonderful eyes which had not their

equal, and which asked questions like a doctor or a priest, are

brilliantly portrayed. Balzac himself allows this, though he complains

to Madame Hanska that they have more of the psychological expression

of the worker than of the loving soul of the individual--a fact for

which we may be grateful to Boulanger. Balzac is much delighted,

however, with Boulanger's portrayal of the insistence and intrepid

faith in the future, a la Coligny or a la Peter the Great, which are

at the base of his character; and he goes on to give an attractive,

though rather picturesque account of his career and past misfortunes,

which is evidently intended to counteract any misgivings Madame Hanska

may feel at his sternness as depicted in the portrait.

"Boulanger has seen the writer only,[*] not the tenderness of the

idiot who will always be deceived, not the softness towards other

people's troubles which cause all my misfortunes to come from my

holding out my hand to weak people who are falling into disaster. In

1827 I help a working printer, and therefore in 1829 find myself

crushed by fifty thousand francs of debt, and thrown without bread

into a gutter. In 1833, when my pen appears to be likely to bring in

enough to pay off my obligations, I attach myself to Werdet. I wish to

make him my only publisher, and in my desire to bring him prosperity,

I sign engagements, and in 1837 find myself owing a hundred and fifty

thousand francs, and liable on this account to be put under arrest, so

that I am obliged to hide. During this time I make myself the Don

Quixote of the poor. I hope to give courage to Sandeau, and I lose

through him four to five thousand francs, which would have saved other

people." It would be interesting to hear what Barbier and Werdet would

have said, if they had been allowed to read this letter; but on

Browning's principle, that a man should show one side to the world,

and the other to the woman he loves, no doubt Balzac's account of past

events was quite justifiable.

[*] "Lettres a l'Etrangere."

Boulanger's picture gave Balzac a great deal of trouble, as well as

delighted yet anxious speculation about Madame Hanska's opinion of it,

when it arrived in Wierzchownia. This was naturally an important

matter, his meetings with her being so rare that, except his letters,

the picture would generally be her only reminder of him; and for this

reason it was most necessary that it should show him at his best. It

was therefore very trying that Boulanger should have exaggerated the

character of his quiet strength, and made him look like a bully and a

soldier; and we can enter thoroughly into his feelings, and sympathise

heartily with his uneasiness, because Boulanger has not quite caught

the fineness of contour under the fatness of the face. Undoubtedly,

the picture does not give the idea of a person of extreme refinement,

or distinction of appearance. Nevertheless, judging from stories told

by his contemporaries, and also from some of the books written by the

great novelist, it seems likely that Boulanger's powerful and strongly

coloured portrait, though only redeemed from coarseness by the intense

concentration of expression and the intellectual light in the

wonderful eyes, was strikingly true to nature, and caught one very

real aspect of the man. Perhaps, however, it was not the one

calculated to work most strongly on the feelings of his absent

lady-love; who, no doubt, poor Balzac hoped, would often make her way

to the spot in the picture gallery where his picture hung in its quaint

frame of black velvet, and would refresh herself with the sight of her

absent friend. When her miniature by Daffinger was sent him, he was

stupefied all day with joy; and he always carried it about with him,

considering it an amulet which brought him good fortune.

He believed in talismans, and had pretty fanciful ideas about being

present to his friends in the sudden flicker of the fire, or the

brightening of a candle-flame. Balzac, the Seer, the believer in

animal magnetism, in somnambulism, in telepathy, the weaver of strange

fancies and impossible daydreams--Balzac with philosophical theories

on the function of thought, and faith in the mystical creed of

Swedenborg--in short, the Balzac of "Louis Lambert" and "Seraphita,"

is not, however, depicted by Boulanger: _he_ can only be found in M.

Rodin's wonderful statue. There the great _voyant_, who, in the

beautiful vision entitled "L'Assomption," saw man and woman perfected

and brought to their highest development, stands in rapt contemplation

and concentration, his head slightly raised, as if listening for the

voice of inspiration, or hearing murmurs of mysteries still

unfathomed.

Somnambulism, in particular, occupied much of Balzac's attention. He

wrote in 1832 to a doctor, M. Chapelain, who evidently shared his

interest in the subject, to ask why medical men had not made use of it

to discover the cause of cholera[*]; and on another occasion, after an

accident to his leg, he sent M. Chapelain, from Aix, two pieces of

flannel which he had worn, and wanted to know from them what caused

the mischief, and why the doctors at their last consultation advised a

blister. Unluckily, we hear no more of this matter, and never have the

satisfaction of learning how much the learned doctor deduced from the

fragments submitted to his inspection. Time after time Balzac mentions

in his correspondence that he has consulted somnambulists when he has

been anxious about the health of the Hanski family; and it is curious

that a few months before he received the letter from Madame Hanska,

telling of her husband's death, he had visited a sorcerer, who by

means of cards, told him many extraordinary things about his past

career, and said that in six weeks he would receive news which would

change his whole life.

[*] "Correspondance," vol. i. p. 147.

The portrait was still destined to cause Balzac much anxiety. After

the close of the Salon, the painter had promised to take a copy of it

for Madame de Balzac, who, "between ourselves," Balzac remarked to

Madame Hanska, would not care much about it, and certainly would not

know the difference between the replica and the original, in which the

soul of the model was searched for, examined and depicted,[*] and

which was, of course, to belong to the beloved friend.

[*] "Lettres a l'Etrangere."

However, there were still many delays. Boulanger showed "horrible

ingratitude," and did not appreciate sufficiently the honour done him

by his illustrious sitter in allowing his portrait to be taken. He

refused at first to begin the copy; but this difficulty was at last

arranged, and the original was carefully packed in a wooden crate,

instead of going in a roll as Balzac had at first intended. Still

there were innumerable stoppages, and doubt where the precious canvas

was located; till the impatient Balzac was only deterred from his

intention of starting a lawsuit against the authorities, by a fear of

bringing the noble name of Hanski into notoriety. It is sad that the

last time we hear of this precious picture in Balzac's lifetime was

when he went to Wierzchownia, in 1849; and then it had been relegated

to a library which few people visited, and he describes it with his

usual energy, as the most hideous daub it is possible to see--quite

black, from the faulty mixing of the colours; a canvas of which, for

the sake of France, he is thoroughly ashamed.

The sketch of the portrait is not disfigured; and the engravings of it

give an interesting view of Balzac's personality. With due deference

to the great psychologist, we cannot think the painter was wrong in

imparting a slightly truculent expression to the face. Balzac was

essentially a fighter: he started life with a struggle against his

family, against the opinion of his friends, and, harder than all,

against his own impotence to give expression to his genius; and, in

the course of his career he made countless enemies, and finished by

enrolling among their ranks most of the literary men of the day. This

alienation was to a great extent caused by his inveterate habit of

boasting, of applying the adjectives "sublime" and "magnificent" to

his own works: an idiosyncracy which was naturally annoying to his

brother authors. It was deprecated even by his devoted and admiring

friends; though they knew that, as George Sand says, it was only

caused by the _naivete_ of an artist, to whom his work was

all-important.

His personal charm was so great, that Werdet, his enemy, says that in

his presence those who loved him, forgot any real or fancied complaint

against him, and only remembered the affection they felt for him.

Nevertheless, in the course of his life of fighting, his ever-pressing

anxieties and the strain of his work, coupled with his belief in the

importance and sacredness of his destiny, made him something of an

egotist. Therefore, in spite of his real goodness of heart, he would

sometimes shoulder his way through the world, oblivious of the

unfortunate people who had come to grief owing to their connection

with him, and careless of the lesser, though very real troubles of

harassed and exasperated editors, when his promised copy was not

forthcoming.

Like Napoleon, to whom, amidst the gibes of his contemporaries, he

likened himself, he wanted everything; and those with this aspiration

must necessarily be heedless of their neighbours' smaller ambitions.

"Without genius, I am undone!" he cried in despair; but when it was

proved beyond dispute that this gift of debatable beneficence was his,

he was still unsatisfied.

What, after all, was the use of genius except as a stepping-stone to

the solid good things of the earth? Where lay the advantage of

superiority to ordinary men, if it could not be employed as a lever

with which to raise oneself? Reasoning thus, his extraordinary

versatility, his power of assimilation, and his varied interests, made

his ambitions many and diverse. The man who could enter with the

masterly familiarity of an expert into affairs of Church, State,

Society, and Finance, who would talk of medicine like a doctor, or of

science like a savant, naturally aspired to excellence in many

directions.

At times, as we have already seen, strange fancies filled his brain:

dreams, for instance, of occupying the highest posts in the land, or

of gaining fabulous sums of money by some wildly impossible scheme,

such as visiting the Great Mogul with a magical ring, or obtaining

rubies and emeralds from a rich Dutchman. The two apparently

incompatible sides to Balzac's character are difficult to reconcile.

On some occasions he appears as the keen business man, who studies

facts in their logical sequence, and has the power of drawing up legal

documents with no necessary point omitted. The masterly Code which he

composed for the use of the "Societe des Gens-de-Lettres" is an

example of this faculty. At other times we are astonished to find that

the great writer is a credulous believer in impossibilities, and a

follower of strange superstitions. A similar paradox may be found in

his books, where, side by side with a truth and occasional brutality

which makes him in some respects the forerunner of the realists, we

find a wealth of imagination and insistence on the power of the higher

emotions, which are completely alien to the school of Flaubert and

Zola.

Perhaps in his own dictum, that genius is never quite sane, gives a

partial explanation of many of his fantastic schemes. The question of

money was his great preoccupation and anxiety, and possibly his

pecuniary difficulties, and the strain of the heavy chain of debt he

dragged after him, constantly adding to its weight by some fresh

extravagance, had affected his mind on this one point. Marriage with

poverty he could not conceive; and, as he was intensely affectionate,

he longed for a home and womanly companionship. "Is there no woman in

the world for me?" he cried despairingly; but in this, as in

everything else, he required so much, that it was difficult to find

any one who would, in his eyes, be worthy to become Madame Honore de

Balzac. His wife must be no ordinary woman; in addition to birth and

wealth, she must possess youth, beauty, and high intellectual gifts;

and one great difficulty was, that the lady endowed with this

combination of excellencies would naturally require some winning, and

Balzac had no time to woo. However, it was absolutely necessary that

his married life should be one of luxury and magnificence, beautiful

surroundings being indispensable to his scheme of existence, "Il

faut," he said, "que l'artiste mene une vie splendide." Therefore,

till the right lady was found, Balzac toiled unceasingly; and when in

Madame Hanska the personification of his ideal at last appeared, he

redoubled his efforts, till overwork, and his longing for her, caused

the decay of his physical powers, and his strength for labour

diminished.

Literature, a rich marriage, a successful play, or a political career,

were all incidentally to make his fortune; though it must be said, in

justice, that this motive, though it entwines itself with everything

in Balzac's life, was not his only, or even his principal incentive to

action.

In his desire to become a deputy, for instance, the longing to serve

his country and to have a voice in her Councils, which he would use

boldly, conscientiously, without fear or favour, to further her true

interests, was ever present with him. As early as 1819, he had begun

to take the keenest interest in the elections, telling M. Dablin, from

whom he wanted a visit, that he dreamed of nothing but him and the

deputies, and begging him for a complete list of those chosen in each

department, with a short notice of his opinion on each.

By the law of election of 1830, any Frenchman who was thirty years of

age, and contributed 500 francs a year directly, in taxes, was

eligible as a deputy. When the law was made Balzac was thirty-one, and

paid the requisite amount; he therefore determined, in spite of his

enormous output of literary work at this time, to add the career of a

deputy to his labours; and in April, 1831, he wrote to ask for the

assistance of the General Baron de Pommereul, with whom he had been

staying at Fougeres, collecting material for "Les Chouans," while at

the same time he worked up the country politically. His manifesto, at

this period, is found in the "Enquete sur la Politique des Deux

Ministeres,"[*] in which he calls the Government a "monarchie tempere

par les emeutes," objects to the "juste milieu" observed by the

Ministers; and while bringing forward, with apparent impartiality, the

advantages of the two courses of peace and war, very evidently longs

for France to take the battlefield again, to obtain what he considers

her natural frontier, that of the Rhine. He also enters _con amore_

into the details of raising a Napoleonic army, and of establishing the

system of the Landwehr in France. A very remarkable passage in this

manifesto is that on the Press; by which, he says, the Government is

terrorised. With extraordinary penetration, he advises that the

strength of journalism shall be broken by the sacrifice of the three

or four millions gained by the "timbre," and the liberation of the

newspapers, which are stronger than the seven ministers--for they

upset the Government, and cannot be themselves suppressed--there will

be a hundred, and the number will neutralise their power, so that they

will become of no account politically.

[*] Another political pamphlet, entitled "Du Gouvernement Moderne,"

written by Balzac at Aix in 1832, has lately been published in the

_North American Review_. The original is in the collection of the

Vicomte de Spoelberch de Lovenjoul.

Balzac had no chance at Fougeres, where a rich proprietor of the

neighbourhood was chosen as deputy, and no doubt M. de Pommereul

advised him not to proceed further in the matter. However, with his

usual tenacity, he wrote in September to M. Henri Berthoud, manager of

the _Gazette de Cambrai_, who wanted to collaborate with the _Revue de

Paris_, promising to further his wishes by all the means in his power,

if M. Berthoud would, on his part, support his candidature at Cambrai.

At the same time, he determined to try Angouleme, where he sometimes

went to stay with a relation, M. Grand-Besancon, and had met a M.

Berges, chief of the Government preparatory school, who was much

struck by his talent, and promised to help him. In June, 1831, he

wrote to Madame Carraud,[*] who took much interest in his political

aspirations, and sent her three copies of the Manifesto for

distribution. He told her that he was working day and night to become

deputy, was going out into society for this purpose; and was so

overwhelmed with business, that he had not touched "La Peau de

Chagrin" since he was last at Saint-Cyr.

[*] "Correspondance," vol. i. p. 118.

He was evidently full of hope; but in spite of the powerful support of

the _Revue de Paris_, the _Temps_, the _Debats_, and the _Voleur_, the

steady-going electors had no mind to be represented by a penniless

young author, who was chiefly known to the general public as the

writer of the "Physiologie du Mariage," a book distinctly _not_

adapted for family reading. Therefore, in this, as in many other hopes

of his life, Balzac was doomed to disappointment; though the readers

of novels may be grateful to the unkind fate which caused him to turn

with renewed ardour to the neglected "Peau de Chagrin." He cherished a

slight resentment against Angouleme, as he showed in "Illusions

Perdues," where the aristocracy of that town are rather unkindly

treated; but he was not discouraged in his political ambitions, and in

1832 he joined with M. Laurentie, the Duc de Noailles, the Duc de

Fitz-James (nephew to the Princesse de Chimay, who acted as proxy for

Marie Antoinette at Madame de Berny's christening) and others, to

found a Legitimist journal, the _Renovateur_. In this appeared an

article against the proposed destruction of the monument to the Duc de

Berry, in which Balzac indignantly asks: "Why do you not finish the

monument, and raise an altar where the priests may pray God to pardon

the assassin?"

Having thus shown his principles clearly, he turned his attention in

1832 to Chinon, which was close to Tours, where he and his family had

lived for so long, and to Sache, where he was a constant visitor.

There, if anywhere, he seemed likely to succeed; and the

_Quotidienne_, the paper which afterwards supported him during his

lawsuit against the _Revue de Paris_, had promised its voice in his

favour. Again cruel Fate dogged his footsteps, as in May he tumbled

out of his tilbury, and his head came violently into contact with what

he calls the "heroic pavements of July"; the accident being a sad

result of his childish delight in driving at a tremendous pace in the

Bois, which is rebuked by his sage adviser, Madame Carraud. Certainly

carriages, horses, and a stable, seemed hardly prudent acquisitions

for a man in debt; but Balzac always defended his pet extravagances

with the specious reasoning that nothing succeeds like success; and

that most of his literary friends did not become rich because they

lived in garrets, and were on that account trampled on by haughty

publishers and editors. He writes to Madame de Girardin on this

occasion: "Only think, that I who am so handsome have been cruelly

disfigured for several days, and it has seemed curious to be uglier

than I really am."[*] As a further and more serious result, he was

laid up in bed, and had to undergo a severe regimen of bleeding,

during the time that he should have been at Sache, working hard about

his election; and when he did arrive there, in June, he recognised

that he was too late for success. However, another dissolution, which

after all did not take place, was expected in September, and Balzac

looked forward to making a determined attempt then. This hope being

frustrated, it was not till 1834 that he again came forward as a

candidate: this time for Villefranche, where, curiously enough,

another M. de Balzac was nominated, and when M. de Hanski wrote to

congratulate Balzac, the latter was obliged to explain the mistake. On

this occasion he had purposed to present himself as champion of the

Bourbon Royal Family, especially of the Duchesse de Berry, for whom he

had an immense admiration, while she read his books with much delight

during her captivity in the Castle of Blaye. He wrote to M. de Hanski

that he considered the exile of Madame and the Comte de Chambord the

great blot on France in the nineteenth century, as the French

Revolution had been her shame in the eighteenth.

[*] "Correspondance," vol. i. p. 147.

This was Balzac's last serious attempt to stand for Parliament during

the Monarchy of July, though he often talked in his letters to Madame

Hanska of his political aspirations, looked forward to becoming a

deputy in 1839, and hoped till then to dominate European opinion

--rather a large ambition--by a political publication. In his letters

he is continually on the point of beginning his career as a statesman;

and in 1835 his views are even more inflated than usual. He will

absorb the _Revue des Deux Mondes_ and the _Revue de Paris_, is in

treaty to obtain one newspaper, and will start two others himself, so

that his power will be irresistible. "Le temps presse, les evenements

se compliquent,"[*] he cries impatiently. He is still strangled by

want of money--a hundred thousand francs is the modest sum he

requires; but he will write a play in the name of his secretary, and

the spectre of debt will be laid for ever.

[*] "Lettres a l'Etrangere."

However, in the stress of work, which made his own life like the

crowded canvas of one of his own novels, these brilliant schemes came

to nothing, and Balzac was never in the proud position of a deputy. He

gives his views clearly in a letter to Madame Carraud in 1830.[*]

"France ought to be a constitutional monarchy, to have a hereditary

royal family, a house of peers of extraordinary strength, which will

represent property, etc., with all possible guarantees for heredity,

and privileges of which the nature must be discussed; then a second

assembly, elective, representing all the interests of the intermediary

mass, which separates those of high social position from the classes

who are generally termed the people."

[*] "Correspondance," vol. i. p. 108.

"The purport of the laws, and their spirit, should be designed to

enlighten the masses as much as possible--those who have nothing, the

workmen, the common people, etc., in order that as many as possible

should arrive at the intermediary state; but the people should, at the

same time, be kept under a most powerful yoke, so that its individuals

may find light, help, and protection, and that no idea, no statute, no

transaction, may make them turbulent.

"The greatest possible liberty should be allowed to the leisured

classes, for they possess something to keep, they have everything to

lose, they can never be dissolute.

"As much power as possible should be granted to the Government. Thus

the Government, the rich people, and the bourgeoisie have interest in

keeping the lowest class happy, and in increasing the number of the

middle class, which is the true strength of the state.

"If rich people, the hereditary possessors of fortune in the highest

Chamber, are corrupt in their manners, and start abuses, these are

inseparable from the existence of all society; they must be accepted,

to balance the advantages given."

This extract is taken from a letter which is, Balzac tells his

correspondent, strictly private; but, with his usual independence and

fearlessness, he did not hesitate to enunciate his opinions in public,

and invariably refused to stoop to compromise or to disguise.

Consequently, we cannot wonder that he never attained his ambition;

particularly as he lacked the aid of money, and had no support, except

the politically doubtful one of a literary reputation. His penetration

and power of prescience were remarkable, and it is startling to find

that he foretells the fall of the Monarchy of July, and the Revolution

of 1848.[*] "I do not think," he says, "that in ten years from now the

actual form of government will subsist--August, 1830, has forgotten

the part played by youth and intelligence. Youth compressed will burst

like the boiler of a steam engine." In "Les Paysans," one of his most

wonderful novels, he gives a vivid picture of the constant struggle

going on under the surface between the peasants and the bourgeoisie,

and shows that the triumph of the former class must be the inevitable

result.

[*] "Revue Parisienne," p. 26

His was essentially a loyal, reverential nature, with the soldierly

respect for constituted authority which is often the characteristic of

strong natures; and he was absolutely unswerving in his principles

--the courage and tenacity which distinguished him through life, never

deserting him in political emergencies. He was patriotic and

high-minded; absolutely immovable in all that concerned his duty. On

one occasion, when it was proposed at a public meeting that the

Legitimists should follow the example of their political opponents and

should stoop to evil doings, he refused decidedly, saying: "The cause

of the life of man is superhuman. It is God who judges; His judgment

does not hinge on our passions."[*] In his eyes, Religion and the

Monarchy were twin sisters, and he speaks sadly in "Le Medecin de

Campagne" of the downfall of both these powers. "With the monarchy we

have lost honour, with our unfruitful attempts at government,

patriotism; and with our fathers' religion, Christian virtue. These

principles now only exist partially, instead of inspiring the masses,

for these ideas never perish altogether. At present, to support

society we have nothing but selfishness."[+] Elsewhere, he laments the

atheistic government, and the increase of incredulity; and longs for

Christian institutions, and a strong hierarchy, united to a religious

society.

[*] "Balzac et ses Oeuvres," by Lamartine de Prat.

[+] "Le Medecin de Campagne."

Balzac was not orthodox. There is no doubt, from a letter to Madame

Hanska, that the Swedenborgian creed he enunciates in "Seraphita" is

to a great extent his own; but he believed in God, in the immortality

of the soul, and considered natural religion, of which, in his eyes,

the Bourbons were the depositors, absolutely essential to the

well-being of a State. He had a great respect for the priesthood, and

has left many a charming and sympathetic picture of the parish _cure_,

such as l'Abbe Janvier in "Le Medecin de Campagne," who acts hand in

hand with the good doctor Benassis, as an enlightened benefactor to

the poor; or l'Abbe Bonnet, the hero of "Le Cure du Village," whose

face had "the impress of faith, an impress giving the stamp of the

human greatness which approaches most nearly to divine greatness, and

of which the undefinable expression beautifies the most ordinary

features." In "Les Paysans" we have another fine portrait, L'Abbe

Brossette, who is doing his work nobly among debased and cunning

peasants. "To serve was his motto, to serve the Church and the

Monarchy at the most menaced points; to serve in the last rank, like a

soldier who feels destined sooner or later to rise to generalship, by

his desire to do well, and by his courage."

There is a beautiful touch in that terrible book "La Cousine Bette,"

where the infamous Madame Marneffe is dying of a loathsome and

infectious disease, so that even Bette, who feels for her the

"strongest sentiment known, the affection of a woman for a woman, had

not the heroic constancy of the Church," and could not enter the room.

Religion alone, in the guise of a Sister of Mercy, watched over her.

Honore de Balzac, His Life and Writings · 第 9 / 17 章