ENNIUS.
The impulse given to Latin literature by Naevius was mainly in two
directions, that of comedy and of a rude epic poetry, drawing its
subjects from Roman traditions and contemporary history. In comedy the
work begun by him was carried on with great vigour and success by his
younger contemporary Plautus; and, in a strictly chronological history
of Roman literature, his plays would have to be examined next in
order. But it will be more convenient to defer the consideration of
Roman comedy, as a whole, till a later chapter, and for the present to
direct attention to the results produced by the immediate successor of
Naevius in epic poetry, Q. Ennius.
The fragments of Ennius will repay a more minute examination than
those of any author belonging to the first period of Roman literature.
They are of more intrinsic value, and they throw more light on the
spirit of the age in which they were written. It was to him, not to
Naevius or to Plautus, that the Romans looked as the father of their
literature. He did more than any other man to make the Roman language
a vehicle of elevated feeling, by forcing it to conform to the
metrical conditions of Greek poetry; and he was the first fully
to elicit the deeper veins of sentiment latent in the national
imagination. The versatility of his powers, his large acquaintance
with Greek literature, his sympathy with the practical interests of
his time, the serious purpose and the intellectual vigour with which
he carried out his work, enabled him to be in letters, what Scipio was
in action, the most vital representative of his epoch. It has
happened too that the fragments from his writings and the testimonies
concerning him are more expressive and characteristic than in the
case of any other among the early writers. There are none of his
contemporaries, playing their part in war or politics, and not many
among the writers of later times, of whom we can form so distinct an
image.
I. LIFE, TIMES, AND PERSONAL TRAITS.
I. He was born at Rudiae, a town of Calabria, in B.C. 239, the year
after the first representation of a drama on the Roman stage. He first
entered Rome in B.C. 204, in the train of Cato, who, when acting as
quaestor in Sardinia, found the poet in that island serving, with the
rank of centurion, in the Roman army. In the poem of Silius Italicus,
he is fancifully represented as distinguishing himself in personal
combat like one of the heroes of the Iliad. After this time he
resided at Rome, 'living,' according to the statement of Jerome,
'very plainly, on the Aventine' (the Plebeian quarter of the city),
'attended only by a single maid-servant[1],' and supporting himself by
teaching Greek and by his writings. He accompanied M. Fulvius Nobilior
in his Aetolian campaign. Through the influence of his son, he
obtained the honour of Roman citizenship, probably at the time when
the colony of Pisaurum was planted in B.C. 184. This distinction
Ennius has himself recorded in a line of the Annals which indicates
the high value which the Roman allies attached to this privilege:--
Nos sumu' Romani qui fuvimus ante Rudini.
He lived on terms of intimacy with influential members of the noblest
families in Rome, and became the familiar friend of the great Scipio.
When he died at the age of seventy, his bust was believed to be placed
in the tomb of the Scipios, between those of the conqueror of Hannibal
and of the conqueror of Antiochus. He died in the year B.C. 169. The
most famous of his works were his Tragedies and the Annals, a long
historical poem written in eighteen books. But, in addition to these,
he composed several miscellaneous works, of which only very scanty
fragments have been preserved.
Among the circumstances which prepared him to be the principal creator
of the national literature, his birthplace and origin, the kind of
education available to him in his early years, and the experience
which awaited him when first entering on life, had a strong
determining influence. His birthplace, Rudiae, is called by Strabo
'a Greek city'; but it was not a Greek colony, like Tarentum and the
other cities of Magna Graecia, but an old Italian town, (the epithet
_vetustae_ is applied to it by Silius) which had been partially
Hellenised, but still retained its native traditions and the use of
the Oscan language. Ennius is thus spoken of as 'Semi-Graecus.' He
laid claim to be descended from the old Messapian kings, a claim which
Virgil is supposed to acknowledge in the introduction of Messapus
leading his followers in the gathering of the Italian races,
Ibant aequati numero regemque canebant.
This claim to royal descent indicates that the poet was a member
of the better class of families in his native district; and the
consciousness of old lineage, which prompted the claim, probably
strengthened the high self-confidence by which he was animated, and
helped to determine the strong aristocratic bias of his sympathies.
He bore witness to his nationality in the saying quoted by Gellius[2]
that 'in the possession of the Greek, Oscan, and Latin speech, he
possessed three hearts.' Of these three languages the Oscan, as the
one of least value to acquire for the purposes of literature or of
social intercourse, was most likely to have been his inherited tongue.
Rudiae, from its Italian nationality, from its neighbourhood to the
cities of Magna Graecia, and from its relation of dependence on Rome,
must have been in the time of the boyhood of Ennius a meeting-place,
not only of three different languages,--that of common life, that
of culture and education, that of military service--but of the three
different spirits or tendencies which were operative in the creation
of the new literature. To his home among the hills overlooking the
Grecian seas[3]--referred to in the expression of Ovid,--
Calabris in montibus ortus--
and in the phrase of Silius,--
Hispida tellus
Miserunt Calabri; Rudiae genuere vetustae,
the poet owed the 'Italian heart,' the virtue of a race still
uncorrupted and unsophisticated, the buoyant energy and freshness
of feeling which enabled him to apprehend all the novelty and the
greatness of the momentous age through which he lived. The South of
Italy afforded, at this time, means of education, which were denied to
Rome or Latium; and the peace enjoyed by his native district for the
first twenty years of his life granted to Ennius leisure to avail
himself of these means, which he could not have enjoyed had he been
born a few years later. In the short account of his life in Jerome's
continuation of the Eusebian Chronicle, it is stated that he was born
at Tarentum. Though this is clearly an error, it seems probable that
the poet may have spent the years of his education there. Though
Tarentum, since its capture by the Romans, had lost its political
importance, it still continued to be a centre of Greek culture and of
social pleasure. Dramatic representations had been especially popular
among a people who had drifted far away 'ex Spartana dura illa et
horrida disciplina[4]' of their ancestors. From the knowledge of the
Attic tragedians displayed by Ennius in his later career it is likely
that he had witnessed representations of their works on a Greek stage,
before he began, in middle life, to direct his own genius to dramatic
composition. The knowledge and admiration of Homer which stimulated
him to the composition of his greatest work, might have been acquired
in any centre of Greek culture. But the intellectual interests
indicated in some of his miscellaneous writings have a kind of local
character, distinguishing them alike from the older philosophies of
Athens and from the more recent science of Alexandria. His acceptance
of the doctrine of the transmigration of souls and the physical
fancies expressed in some of the fragments of the Epicharmus probably
came to him from the teaching of the Neo-Pythagoreans, who were
widely spread among the Greeks of Southern Italy. The rationalistic
speculations of Euhemerus, which appear in strange union with the
'somnia Pythagorea' of the Annals, were of Sicilian origin. The
gastronomic treatise, which Ennius afterwards translated into Latin,
was the work of Archestratus of Gela. The class of persons for whom
such a work would originally be written was likely to be found among
the luxurious livers of Sicily and Magna Graecia. Thus while the
serious poetry of Ennius was inspired by the older and nobler works
of Greek genius, the influence of a more vulgar and prosaic class
of teachers, transmitted by him to Roman thought and literature, was
probably derived from the place of his early education.
His Italian spirit, and the Greek culture acquired by him in early
youth, were two of the conditions out of which the new literature was
destined to arise. The third condition was his steadfast and ardent
Roman patriotism. Born more than a generation after his native
district had ceased to be at war with Rome, he grew up to manhood
during the years of peace between the first and second Carthaginian
wars, when the supremacy of Rome was loyally accepted. Between early
manhood and middle life he was a witness of and an actor in the
protracted and long doubtful struggle between the two great Imperial
States, on the issue of which hung the future destinies of the
world:--
Omnia cum belli trepido concussa tumultu
Horrida contremuere sub altis aetheris oris;
In dubioque fuere utrorum ad regna cadendum
Omnibus humanis esset terraque marique[5].
Though during that struggle the loyalty of some of the Italian
communities was shaken, yet the aristocratic party in every city, and
the Greek States generally, were true to the Roman alliance[6].
Thus his political sympathies, as well as his Greek education, would
incline Ennius to identify himself with the cause of Rome, and his
ardent imagination apprehended the grandeur and majesty with which she
played her part in the contest. It was in the Second Punic War that
the ideal of what was greatest in the character and institutions of
Rome was most fully realised. Her good fortune supplied from among
the contingent furnished to the war by her Messapian allies a man of
a nature so sympathetic with her own and an imagination so vivid as to
gain for the ideal thus created a permanent realisation.
Of the share which Ennius had in the war we know only that he served
in Sardinia with the rank of centurion. That he had become a man of
some note in that capacity is suggested by the fact that he attracted
the attention of the Roman quaestor Cato, and accompanied him to Rome.
A certain dramatic interest attaches to this first meeting of the
typical representative of Roman manners and traditions and great enemy
of foreign innovations, with the man by whom, more than by any one
else, the mind of Rome was enlarged and liberalised, and many of her
most cherished convictions were most seriously undermined. This actual
service in a great war left its impress on the work done by Ennius.
Fragments both of his tragedies and his Annals prove how thoroughly
he understood and appreciated the best qualities of the soldierly
character. This fellowship in hardship and danger fitted him to become
the national poet of a race of soldiers. He has drawn from his own
observation an image of the fortitude and discipline of the Roman
armies, and of the patriotic devotion and resolution of the men
by whom these armies were led. There is a strong realism in the
expression of martial sentiment in Ennius, marking him out as a man
familiar with the life of the camp and the battle-field, and quite
distinct from the idealising enthusiasm of Livy and Virgil[7].
Ennius entered on his career as a writer at a time when the long
strain of a great struggle was giving place to the confidence and
security of a great triumph. He lived for thirty-five years longer,
witnessing the rapid advance of Roman conquest in Greece and Asia,
and over the barbarous tribes of the West. He died one year before
the crowning victory of Pydna. During all his later life his sanguine
spirit and patriotic enthusiasm were buoyed up by the success of the
Roman and Italian arms abroad; while his political sympathies were in
thorough accord with the dominant influences in the government of the
State. At no other period of Roman history was the ascendency of the
Senate and of the great houses more undisputed, or, on the whole, more
wisely and ably exercised. In the lists of those who successively fill
the great curule magistracies, we find almost exclusively the names of
members of the old patrician or of the more recent plebeian nobility.
At no other period does the tribunician opposition to the senatorian
direction of affairs and to the authority of the magistrate appear
weaker or more intermittent. It was not till a generation after the
death of Ennius that the moral corruption and political and social
disorganisation--the ultimate results of the great military successes
gained under the absolute ascendency of the Senate,--became fully
manifest. It is difficult to say how far the aristocratic and
antipopular bias of all Roman literature may have been determined by
the political conditions of the time in which that literature received
the most powerful impulse, and by the personal relations and peculiar
stamp of character of the man by whom that impulse was given.
Along with the military and political activity of the time, during
which Ennius lived in Rome, the stirring of a new intellectual life
was apparent. Even during the war dramatic representations continued
to take place, and the most active part of the career of Naevius, and
a considerable part of that of Plautus, belong to the years during
which Hannibal was still in Italy. After the cessation of the war, we
note in the pages of Livy that much greater prominence is given to
the celebration of public games, of which at this time dramatic
representations formed the chief part. The regular holidays for which
the Aediles provided these entertainments became more numerous; and
the art of the dramatist was employed to enhance the pomp of the
spectacle on the occasion of a great triumph, or of the funeral of an
illustrious man. The death of Livius Andronicus and the banishment of
Naevius, which must have happened about the time that Ennius arrived
at Rome, had deprived the Roman stage of the only writers of any
name, who had attempted to introduce upon it the works of the Greek
tragedians. Ennius had, indeed, rather to create than to revive the
taste for tragedy. The prologue to the Amphitryo[8] shows how much
more congenial the reproduction of the ordinary life of the Greeks
was to the uneducated audiences of Rome than the higher effort to
familiarise them with the personages and adventures of the heroic age.
The great era of Roman comedy was coincident with the literary career
of Ennius. It was then that the best extant plays of Plautus were
produced, and that Caecilius Statius, whom ancient critics ranked as
his superior, flourished. The quality attributed to the latter in the
line of Horace,
Vincere Caecilius gravitate, Terentius arte,
indicates a closer affinity with the spirit of Ennius, than the moral
and political indifference of the older dramatist. The aim of Ennius
was to raise literature from being a mere popular recreation, and to
bring it into accord with the higher mood of the nation; to use it as
a medium both of elevation and enlightenment. In carrying out this
aim he appealed to the temper and to the newly awakened interests of
members of the aristocratic class, who were coming into close contact
with educated Greeks, and were beginning to appreciate the treasures
of art and literature now opened up to them. The career of Q. Fabius
Pictor, the first historian of Rome, and the first who made a name
for himself in painting, who lived at this time, attests this twofold
attraction. The friendly relations which Roman generals, such as T.
Quintius Flamininus, established with the famous Greek cities, in
which they appeared as liberators rather than conquerors, were the
result of intellectual enthusiasm as much as of a definite policy.
With the wars of Pyrrhus and the capture of Tarentum, the first stage
of the process described in the lines of Horace began[9]: the end of
the Second Punic War was the second stage in the process. It is to
this period, rather than to the progress of the war, that the words of
the Grammarian, Porcius Licinus, most truly apply,
Poenico bello secundo Musa pinnato gradu
Intulit se bellicosam in Romuli gentem feram.
The more frequent and closer contact with the mind of Greece not only
refined the taste and enlarged the intelligence of those capable of
feeling its influence, but produced at the same time a change in
men's deepest convictions. Though the definite tenets of Stoicism
and Epicureanism did not acquire ascendency till a later time, the
dissolving force of Greek speculative thought and Greek views of life
forced its way into Rome through various channels,--especially through
the adaptations of the tragedies of Euripides and of the comedy
of Menander. All these tendencies of the time acted on Ennius,
stimulating his mental activity in various directions. His natural
temperament and his acquired culture brought him into harmony with
the spirit of his age without raising him too much above it. A poet
of more delicacy of taste and perfection of execution would have been
unintelligible to his contemporaries. A more systematic thinker would
have been out of harmony with the conditions of life by which he was
surrounded. Breadth, vigour, a spirit clinging to what was most vital
in the old state of things, and yet readily adapting itself to what
was new, were the qualities needed to establish a literature true
to the genius of Rome in the second century B.C., and containing the
promise of the more perfect accomplishment of a later age. And these
qualities belonged to Ennius by natural gifts and the experience and
culture of his earlier years.
There is no reason to believe that he had obtained any eminence in
literature before he settled in middle age at Rome. His genius was
of that robust order which grows richer and livelier with advancing
years. The Annals was the work of his old age,--the ripe fruit of
a strong and energetic manhood, prolonged to the last in hopeful
activity. Cicero speaks of 'the cheerfulness with which he bore the
two evils of old age and poverty[10].' Wherever the poet speaks of
himself, his words reveal a sanguine and contented spirit; as, in that
fine simile, where he compares himself, at the close of his active and
successful career, to a brave horse which has often won the prize at
the Olympian games, and in old age obtains his well-deserved repose:--
Sicut fortis equus, spatio qui saepe supremo
Vicit Olimpia, nunc senio confectu' quiescit.
In none of his fragments is there any trace of that melancholy
after-thought which pervades the poetry of his greatest successors,
Lucretius and Virgil. From the humorous exaggeration of Horace,
Ennius ipse pater nunquam, nisi potus, ad arma
Prosiluit dicenda;
and from the poet's own confession,
Nunquam poetor, nisi si podager,
it may be inferred that he belonged to the class of poets of a lusty
and social nature, of which Dryden is a type in modern times, who
enjoyed the pleasures of wine and good fellowship. The well-known
anecdote, told by Cicero, of the interchange of visits between Scipio
Nasica and Ennius[11], though not a brilliant specimen of Roman wit,
is interesting from the light which it throws on the easy terms of
intimacy in which the poet lived with the members of the most eminent
Roman families. Such testimonies and traits of personal character make
us think of Ennius as a man of genial and social temper, as well as of
'an intense and glowing mind.'
It was probably through his position as a teacher of Greek that Ennius
first became known to the leading men of Rome. If this position was at
first one of dependence, similar to that in which in earlier times the
client stood to his patron, it soon changed into one of mutual esteem
and admiration. We can best understand the relation in which he stood
to men eminent in the state and in the camp, from a passage from the
seventh book of the Annals quoted by Aulus Gellius. In that passage
the poet is stated, on the authority of L. Aelius Stilo[12] (an early
grammarian, a friend of Lucilius, and one of Cicero's teachers),
to have drawn his own portrait, under an imaginary description of
a confidential friend of the Roman general, Servilius Geminus. The
portrait has the air of being drawn from the life, with a rapid and
forcible hand, and with a minuteness of detail significant of close
personal observation:--
Haece locutu' vocat quocum bene saepe libenter
Mensam sermonesque suos rerumque suarum
Congeriem partit, magnam cum lassu' diei
Partem fuisset de summis rebu' regendis
Consilio, indu foro lato sanctoque senatu:
Cui res audacter magnas parvasque jocumque
Eloqueretur, cuncta simul malaque et bona dictu
Evomeret, si qui vellet, tutoque locaret.
Quocum multa volup ac gaudia clamque palamque!
Ingenium cui nulla malum sententia suadet
Ut faceret facinus levis aut malu', doctu', fidelis,
Suavis homo, facundu', suo contentu', beatus,
Scitu', secunda loquens in tempore, commodu', verbum
Paucum, multa tenens antiqua sepulta, vetustas
Quem fecit mores veteresque novosque tenentem,
Multorum veterum leges divumque hominumque;
Prudenter qui dicta loquive tacereve possit.
Hunc inter pugnas Servilius sic compellat[13].
There are many touches in this picture, which suggest the kind of
intimacy in which Ennius may have lived with Fulvius Nobilior when
accompanying him in his Aetolian campaign, or his bearing when taking
part in the light or serious talk of the Scipios. The learning and
power of speech, the knowledge of antiquity and of the manners of the
day, attributed to this friend of Servilius, were gifts which we may
attribute to the poet both on ancient testimony and on the evidence
afforded by the fragments of his writings. The good sense, tact, and
knowledge of the world, the cheerfulness in life and conversation, the
honour and integrity of character represented in the same passage, are
among the personal qualities which, in all ages, form a bond of union
between men eminent in great practical affairs and men eminent in
literature. Such were the qualities which, according to his own
account, recommended Horace to the intimate friendship of Maecenas.
Many expressive fragments from the lost poetry of Ennius give
assurance that he was a man in whom learning and the ardent
temperament of genius were happily united with the worth and sense
described in this nameless portrait.
By his personal merit he broke through the strongest barriers ever
raised by national and family pride, and made the name of poet,
instead of a reproach, a name of honour with the ruling class at Rome.
The favourable impression which he produced on the 'primitive virtue'
of Cato, by whom he was first brought to Rome, was more probably due
to his force of character and social qualities than to his genius and
literary accomplishment,--qualities seemingly little valued by his
earliest patron, who, in one of his speeches, reproached Fulvius
Nobilior with allowing himself to be accompanied by a poet in his
campaign. But the strongest proof of the worth and the wisdom of
Ennius is his intimate friendship with the greatest Roman of the
age, and the conqueror of the greatest soldier of antiquity. It
is honourable to the friendship of generous natures, that the poet
neither sought nor gained wealth from this intimacy, but continued to
live plainly and contentedly on the Aventine. Yet after death it was
believed that the two friends were not divided; and the bust of the
provincial poet found a place among the remains of that time-honoured
family, the record of whose grandeur has been preserved, even to
the present day, in the august simplicity of their monumental
inscriptions.
The elder Africanus may have been attracted to Ennius not only by his
passion for Greek culture, but by a certain community of nature. The
mystical enthusiasm, the high self-confidence, the direct simplicity
combined with majesty of character, impressed on the language of the
poet were equally impressed on the action and bearing of the soldier.
The feeling which Ennius in his turn entertained for Scipio was one
of enthusiastic admiration. While paying due honour to the merits and
services of other famous men, even of such as Cato and Fabius, who
were most opposed to his idol, of Scipio he said that Homer alone
could worthily have uttered his praises[14].
In addition to the part which he assigned to him in the Ninth Book
of the Annals, he devoted a separate poem to commemorate his
achievements. He has left also two short inscriptions, written in
elegiac verse, in which he proclaims in words of burning enthusiasm
the momentous services and transcendent superiority of the 'great
world's victor's victor'--
Hic est ille situs cui nemo civi' neque hostis
Quivit pro factis reddere opis pretium[15];
and this also,
A sole exoriente supra Maeoti' paludes
Nemo est qui factis me aequiperare queat.
Si fas endo plagas caelestium ascendere cuiquam est,
Mi soli caeli maxima porta patet[16].
With many marked differences, which distinguish a man of active,
social, and national sympathies from a student of Nature and a thinker
on human life, there is a certain affinity of character and genius
between Ennius and Lucretius. Enthusiastic admiration of personal
greatness is one prominent feature in which they resemble one another.
But while Lucretius is the ardent admirer of contemplative and
imaginative greatness, it is greatness in action and character which
moves the admiration of Ennius. They resemble each other also in their
strong consciousness of genius and their high estimate of its function
and value. Cicero mentions that Ennius applied the epithet _sanctus_
to poets. Lucretius applies the same epithet to the old philosophic
poets, as in the lines of strong affection and reverence which he
dedicates to Empedocles,
Nil tamen hoc habuisse viro praeclarius in se,
Nec _sanctum_ magis, et mirum carumque videtur[17].
The inscription which Ennius composed for his own bust directly
expresses his sense of the greatness of his work, and his confident
assurance of fame, and of the lasting sympathy of his countrymen--
Aspicite, O cives, senis Enni imagini' formam,
Hic vestrum panxit maxima facta patrum.
Nemo me lacrimis decoret nec funera fletu
Faxit. Cur? Volito vivu' per ora virum[18].
Two lines from one of his satires--
Enni poeta salve qui mortalibus
Versus propinas flammeos medullitus[19],
indicate in still stronger terms his burning consciousness of power.
Some of the greatest of modern poets, such as Dante, Milton, and
Wordsworth, have manifested a feeling similar to that expressed by
Ennius and Lucretius. Although appearing in strange contrast with the
self-suppression of the highest creative art (as seen in Homer, in
Sophocles, and in Shakspeare), this proud self-confidence, 'disdainful
of help or hindrance,' is the usual accompaniment of an intense nature
and of a genius exercised with some serious moral, religious, or
political purpose. The least pleasing side of the feeling, even in
men of generous nature, is the scorn,--not of envy, but of imperfect
sympathy,--which they are apt to entertain towards rival genius or
antagonistic convictions. Something of this spirit appears in the
disparaging allusion of Ennius to his predecessor Naevius:--
Scripsere alii rem
Versibu', quos olim Fauni vatesque canebant,
Quum neque Musarum scopulos quisquam superarat
Nec dicti studiosus erat[20].
The contempt here expressed for the metre employed by the older poet
seems to be the counterpart of his own exultation in being the first
to introduce what he called 'the long verses' into Latin literature.
Another point in which there is some affinity between Ennius and
Lucretius is their religious temper and convictions. There is indeed
no trace in Ennius of the rigid intellectual consistency of Lucretius,
nor in Lucretius any sympathy with those mystic speculations which
Ennius derived from the lore attributed to Pythagoras. But in both
deep feelings of awe and reverence are combined with a scornful
disbelief of the superstition of their time. They both apply the
principles of Euhemerism to resolve the bright creations of the old
mythology into their original elements. Ennius, like Lucretius, seems
to deny the providence of the gods. He makes one of the personages of
his dramas give expression to the thought which perplexed the minds
of Thucydides and Tacitus--the thought, namely, of the apparent
disconnexion between prosperity and goodness, as affording proof of
the divine indifference to human well-being--
Ego deum genus esse semper dixi et dicam caelitum,
Sed eos non curare opinor, quid agat humanum genus;
Nam si curent, bene bonis sit, male malis, quod nunc abest[21]:
and he exposed, with caustic sense, the false pretences of augurs,
prophets, and astrologers. His translation of the Sacred Chronicle of
Euhemerus exercised a permanent influence on the religious convictions
of his countrymen. But while led to these conclusions by the spirit
of his age, and by the study of the later speculations of Greece, he
believed in the soul's independence of the body, and of its continued
existence, under other conditions, after death. He declared that the
spirit of Homer, after many changes,--at one time having animated a
peacock[22], again, having been incarnate in the sage of Crotona,--had
finally passed into his own body: and he told how the shade--which he
regards as distinct from the soul or spirit--of his great prototype
had appeared to him from the invisible world,--
Quo neque permaneant animae neque corpora nostra
Sed quaedam simulacra modis pallentia miris,
and explained to him the whole plan of nature. These dreams of the
imagination may not have been without effect in enabling Ennius to
escape from the gloom which 'eclipsed the brightness of the world' to
Lucretius. The light in which the world appeared to the older poet was
that of common sense strangely blended with imaginative mysticism.
He thus seems to stand midway between the spiritual aspirations of
Empedocles and the negation of Lucretius. Born in the vigorous prime
of Italian civilisation he came into the inheritance of the bold
fancies of the earlier Greeks and of the dull rationalism of their
later speculation. His ideas on what transcends experience appear thus
to have been without the unity arising from an unreflecting acceptance
of tradition, or from the basis of philosophical consistency.
II. HIS WORKS.--(1) MISCELLANEOUS WORKS.
II. (1) In laying the foundations of Roman literature, Ennius
displayed not only the fervent sympathies and active faculty of
genius, but also great energy and industry, and a many-sided learning.
The composition of his tragedies and of the Annals, while making most
demand on his original gifts, implied also a diligent study of
Homer and of the Greek tragedians, and a large acquaintance with the
traditions and antiquities of Rome. But besides the works on which
his highest poetical faculty was employed, other writings, of a
philosophical, didactic, and miscellaneous character, gave evidence of
the versatility of his powers and interests. It does not appear that
he was the author of any prose writing. His version of the Sacred
Chronicle of Euhemerus was more probably a poetical adaptation than
a literal prose translation of that work. The work of Euhemerus was
conceived in that spirit of vulgar rationalism, which is condemned by
Plato in the Phaedrus. He explained away the fables of mythology,
by representing them as a supernatural account of historical events.
Several extracts of the work quoted by Lactantius, as from the
translation of Ennius, look as if they had been reduced from a form
originally metrical into the prose of a later era[23]. There is thus
no evidence, direct or indirect, to prove that Ennius had any share in
forming the style of Latin prose. But if verse was the sole instrument
which he used, this was certainly not due to the poetical character
of all the topics which he treated, but, more likely, to the fact
that his acquired aptitude, and the state of the Latin language in
his time, made metrical writing more natural and easy than prose
composition.
One of his works in verse was a treatise on good living, called
Hedyphagetica, founded on the gastronomic researches of Archestratus
of Gela,--a sage who is said to have devoted his life to the study of
everything that contributed to the pleasures of the table, and to have
recorded his varied experience and research with the grave dignity of
epic verse. A few lines from this translation or adaptation of Ennius,
giving an account of the coasts on which the best fish are to be
found, have been preserved by Apuleius. The lines are curious as
exemplifying that tone of half-serious enthusiasm, which all who
treat, either in prose or verse, of the pleasures of eating seem
naturally to adopt, as for instance the Catius of Horace in his
discourse on gastronomy[24]. The language in which the _scarus_, a
fish unhappily lost to the modern epicure, is described as 'the brain
almost of almighty Jove,' fits all the requirements of gastronomic
rapture:--
Quid turdum, merulam, melanurum umbramque marinam
Praeterii, atque scarum, cerebrum Jovi' paene supremi?
Nestoris ad patriam hic capitur magnusque bonusque.
He wrote also a philosophical poem in trochaic septenarian verse,
called Epicharmus, founded on writings attributed to the old Sicilian
poet, which appear to have resolved the gods of the Greek mythology
into natural substances[25]. A few slight fragments have been
preserved from this poem. They speak of the four elements or
principles of the universe as 'water, earth, air, the sun'; of 'the
blending of heat with cold, dryness with moisture'; of 'the earth
bearing and supporting all nations and receiving them again back into
herself.' The following is the longest fragment from the poem:--
Istic est is Jupiter quem dico, quem Graeci vocant
Aerem: qui ventus est et nubes; imber postea
Atque ex imbre frigus: ventus post fit, aer denuo,
Haece propter Jupiter sunt ista quae dico tibi,
Quoniam mortalis atque urbes beluasque omnis juvat[26].
These fragments and a passage from the opening lines of the Annals,
where the shade of Homer was introduced as discoursing to Ennius
(like the shade of Anchises to Aeneas), on 'the nature of things,' are
specimens of that vague curiosity about the facts and laws of Nature,
which, in ancient times, supplied the absence of scientific knowledge.
Such physical speculations possessed a great attraction for the
Roman poets. The spirit of the Epicharmus, as well as of the Sacred
Chronicle of Euhemerus, reappears in the poem of Lucretius. Ennius was
the first among his countrymen who expressed that curiosity as to the
ultimate facts of Nature and that sense of the mysterious life of the
universe, which acted as the most powerful intellectual impulse on the
mind of Lucretius, and which fascinated the imagination of Virgil.
Another of his miscellaneous works, probably of a moral and didactic
character, was known by the name of Protreptica. It is possible that
all of these works[27], as well as the Scipio, formed part of the
Saturae, or Miscellanies, under which title Ennius composed four,
or, according to another authority, six books. The Romans looked
upon Lucilius as the inventor of satire in the later sense of that
word[28];--he having been the first to impress upon the satura the
character of censorious criticism, which it has borne since his time.
But there was another kind of satura, of which Ennius and Pacuvius in
early times, and Varro at a somewhat later time, were regarded as the
principal authors. This was really a miscellany treating of various
subjects, in various metres, and, as employed by Varro, was written
partly in prose, partly in verse. This kind of composition, as well
as the Lucilian satire, arose out of the old indigenous satura or
dramatic medley, familiar to the Romans before the introduction of
Greek literature. When the scenic element in the original satura was
superseded by the new comedy introduced from Greece, the old name
was first applied to a miscellaneous kind of composition, in which
ordinary topics were treated in a serious but apparently desultory
way; and even as employed by Lucilius and Horace the satura retained
much of its original character. The satires of Ennius were written
in various metres, iambic, trochaic, and hexameter, and treated of
various topics of personal and public interest. The few passages which
ancient authorities quote as fragments from them are not of much value
in themselves, but when taken in connexion with the testimonies as to
their character, they are of some interest as showing that this kind
of composition was a form intermediate between the old dramatic satura
and the satire of Lucilius and Horace. It is recorded that in one
of these pieces, Ennius introduced a dialogue between Life and
Death;--thus transmitting in the use of dialogue (which appears very
frequently in Horace and Persius) some vestige of the original
scenic medley. Ennius also appears, like Lucilius and Horace, to have
communicated in his satires his own personal feelings and experience,
as in the fragment already quoted:--
Nunquam poetor, nisi si podager.
Further satire, in the hands of its chief masters, aimed at practical
moral teaching, not only by precept, ridicule, and invective, and
by portraiture of individuals and of types, but also by the use of
anecdotes and fables. This last mode of inculcating homely lessons on
the conduct of life is common in Horace. It appears, however, to have
been first used by Ennius. Aulus Gellius mentions that Aesop's fable
of the field-lark and the husbandman 'is very skilfully and gracefully
told by Ennius in his satires'; and he quotes the advice appended to
the fable, 'Never to expect your friends to do for you what you can do
for yourself':
Hoc erit tibi argumentum semper in promptu situm:
Nequid expectes amicos, quod tute agere possies[29].
These miscellaneous works of Ennius were the fruits of his learning
and literary industry, rather than of his genius. Such works might
have been written in prose, if the art of prose composition had been
as familiar as that of verse. It is in the fragments of his dramas,
and still more of the Annals, that his poetic power is most apparent,
and that the influence which he exercised over the Roman mind and
literature is discerned.
(2) DRAMAS.
(2) Before the time of Ennius, the Roman drama, both tragic and comic,
had established itself at Rome, in close imitation of the tragedy
and the new comedy of Athens. The latter had been most successfully
cultivated by Naevius and his younger contemporary, Plautus. The
advancement of tragedy to an equal share of popular favour was due to
the severer genius of Ennius. He appears however to have tried, though
without much success, to adapt himself to the popular taste in favour
of comedy. The names of two of his comedies, viz. _Cupuncula_ and
_Pancratiastae_, have come down to us; but their fragments are too
insignificant to justify the formation of any opinion on their merits.
His admirers in ancient times nowhere advance in his favour any claim
to comic genius. Volcatius Sedigitus, an early critic, who wrote a
work _De Poetis_, and who has already been referred to as assigning
the third rank in the list of comic poets to Naevius, mentions Ennius
as tenth and last, solely 'antiquitatis causa.' Any inference that
might be drawn from the character exhibited in the other fragments of
Ennius, would accord both with the negative and positive evidence
of antiquity, as to his deficiency in comic power. He has nothing in
common with that versatile and dramatic genius, in which occasionally
the highest imagination has been united with the most abundant humour.
The real bent of his mind, as revealed in his higher poetry, is grave
and intense, like that of Lucretius or Milton. Many of the conceits,
strained effects, and play on words, found in his fragments, imply
want of humour as well as an imperfect poetic taste. Thus, in the
following fragment from one of his satires, the meaning of the passage
is more obscured than pointed by the forced iteration and play upon
the word _frustra_:--
Nam qui lepide postulat alterum frustrari,
Quom frustrast, frustra illum dicit frustra esse.
Nam qui se frustrari quem frustra sentit,
Qui frustratur frustrast, si ille non est frustra[30].
The love of alliteration and assonance, which is conspicuous also in
Plautus and in the fragments of Pacuvius and Accius, and which seems
to have been the natural accompaniment of the new formative energy
imparted to the Latin language by the earliest poets and orators,
appears in its most exaggerated form in such lines as the
O Tite tute Tati tibi tanta tiranne tulisti,
quoted from the Annals. Many of his fragments show indeed that he
possessed the caustic spirit of a satirist; but it was in the light
of common sense, not of humour, that he regarded the follies of the
world.
The general character of Roman tragedy, so far as it can be
ascertained from ancient testimony and the extant fragments of the
early tragedians, will be examined in the following chapter. It is not
possible to determine what dramatic power Ennius may have displayed in
the evolution of his plots or the delineation of his characters. His
peculiar genius is more distinctly stamped on his epic than on his
dramatic fragments. Still many of the latter, in their boldness of
conception and expression, and in their strong and fervid morality,
are expressive of the original force of the poet, and of the Roman
temper of his mind. Some of them will be brought forward in
the sequel, along with passages from the Annals, as important
contributions to our estimate of the poet's genius and intellect.
It was certainly due to Ennius that Roman tragedy was first raised to
that pitch of popular favour which it enjoyed till the age of Cicero.
While actively employed in many other fields of literature, he carried
on the composition of his tragedies till the latest period of his
life. Cicero records that the _Thyestes_ was represented at the
celebration of the Ludi Apollinares, shortly before the poet's
death[31]. The titles of about twenty-five of his tragedies are known,
and a few fragments remain from all of them. About one half of these
bear the titles of the heroes and heroines connected with the Trojan
cycle of events, such as the _Achilles_, _Achilles Aristarchi_,
_Ajax_, _Alexander_, _Andromache Aechmalotis_, _Hectoris Lutra_,
_Hecuba_, _Iphigenia_, _Phoenix_, _Telamo_. One at least of his
tragedies, the _Medea_, was literally translated from the Greek of
Euripides, whom he seems to have made his model, in preference to
the older Attic dramatists. Cicero[32] speaks of it, along with the
Antiope of Pacuvius, as being translated word for word from the Greek;
and a comparison of the fragments of the Latin with the passages in
the Medea of Euripides shows how closely Ennius followed his original.
In one place he has mistranslated his author,--the passage (Eur. Med.
215),
[Greek:
oida gar pollous broton
semnous gegotas, tous men ommaton apo
tous d' en thyraiois],
being thus rendered in Latin,--
Multi suam rem bene gessere et publicam patria procul.
The opening lines of the Medea of Ennius may be quoted as probably a
fair specimen of the degree of faithfulness with which the early Roman
tragedians translated from their originals. There is some nervous
force, but little either of poetical grace or musical flow in the
language:--
Utinam ne in nemore Pelio securibus
Caesa cecidisset abiegna ad terram trabes,
Neve inde navis inchoandae exordium
Coepisset, quae nunc nominatur nomine
Argo, quia Argivi in ea dilecti viri
Vecti petebant pellem inauratam arietis
Colchis, imperio regis Peliae, per dolum;
Nam nunquam era errans mea domo ecferret pedem
Medea, animo aegra, amore saevo saucia[33].
In his Hecuba, also, and probably in his Iphigenia, Ennius made free
use of the dramas founded on the same subjects by Euripides. But in
many of his dramatic fragments the sentiment expressed is clearly
that of a Roman, not of a Greek mind[34]. The subjects of many of
his dramas, such as the Achilles, the Ajax, the Hectoris Lutra, the
Telamon, the Iphigenia, afforded scope for the exhibition of the
soldierly character. Cicero[35] adduces the wounded Eurypylus as an
example of the kind of fortitude and superiority to pain produced by
the discipline of the Roman armies. The same author quotes with
great admiration scenes from the Alexander and from the Andromache
Aechmalotis, in which pathos is the predominant sentiment. He adds to
his quotations the comments 'O poema tenerum, et moratum, et molle';
and again, 'O poetam egregium, quamquam ab his cantoribus Euphorionis
contemnitur! Sentit omnia repentina et necopinata esse graviora ...
praeclarum carmen est enim et rebus et verbis et modis lugubre[36].'
In the former of these scenes Cassandra, under the influence of
Apollo, reluctant and _ashamed_ (perhaps in this feeling the hand of a
Roman rather than of a Greek poet may be recognised), yet mastered by
prophetic fury, bursts forth in these wild, agitated tones:--
Adest, adest fax obvoluta sanguine atque incendio:
Multos annos latuit: cives ferte opem et restinguite.
Iamque mari magno classis cita
Texitur: exitium examen rapit.
Advenit, et fera velivolantibus
Navibus complevit manus litora[37].
We see in this passage how the passionate character of the situation
is enhanced by the mysterious power attributed to Cassandra. A similar
excitement of feeling, produced by supernatural terror, appears in a
fragment of the Alcmaeon, quoted also by Cicero, and of another the
motive is the awe associated with the dim and pale realms of
the dead[38]. In these and similar passages we note the power of
expressing the varying moods of passion by varied effects of metre.
Horace characterises his ordinary verse in the line,
In scaenam missos cum magno pondere versus;
and this slow and weighty movement seems to have been the general
character of his metre in the calmer parts of his dramas. But in a
large number of the fragments of the dialogue, where there is any
excitement of feeling or intensity of thought, we find him using
the more rapid trochaic septenarian, with quick transitions to the
anapaestic dimeter, or tetrameter, as the passion passes beyond the
control of the speaker.
In two of his dramas, the Sabinae and Ambracia, he made use of
materials supplied by the early legendary history of Rome, and by
a great contemporary event. The first of these, like the Romulus of
Naevius, belonged to the class of 'fabulae Praetextatae,' and was
founded on the intervention of the Sabine women in the war between
Romulus and Tatius. The second, representing the capture of the town
of Ambracia, in the Aetolian war, may, like the Clastidium of the
older poet (written in celebration of the victory of Marcellus over
the Gauls), have had more of the character of a military pageant
and, in all probability, was composed for representation at the games
celebrated on the triumphal return of M. Fulvius Nobilior from that
war.
(3) THE ANNALS.
(3) But the poem which was the chief result of his life, and made an
epoch in Latin literature, was the Annals. On the composition of this
work he rested his hopes of popular and permanent fame--
Hic vestrum panxit maxima facta patrum:
and again, apparently at the opening of the poem, he wrote,--
Latos per populos terrasque poemata nostra
Clara cluebunt.
At its conclusion, he claimed for his old age the repose due to a
brave and triumphant career. He composed the eighteenth book, the
last, in his sixty-seventh year, three years before his death[39].
The great length to which the poem extended, and the vast amount of
materials which it embraced, imply a long and steady concentration of
his powers on the task. It was one requiring much learning as well
as original conception. The fragments of the poem afford proofs of a
familiarity with Homer, and of acquaintance with the Cyclic poets[40].
It is impossible to say how much of the early Roman history, as it
has come down to modern times, is due to the diligence of Ennius in
collecting, and to his genius in giving life to the traditions and
ancient records of Rome. He was certainly the earliest writer who
gathered them up, and united them in a continuous narrative. The work
accomplished by him required not only the antiquarian lore of a man
Multa tenens, antiqua, sepulta,
and the power of imagination to give a new shape to the past, but an
intimate knowledge of the great events and the great men of his own
time, and a strong sympathy with the best spirit of his age.
The poem was written in eighteen books. Of these books about six
hundred lines have been preserved in fragments, varying from about
twenty lines to half a line in length. From the minuteness with which
comparatively unimportant matters are described, it is inferred that
the separate books extended to a much greater length than those either
of the Iliad or of the Aeneid. Of the first book there remain about
120 lines, including the dream of Ilia in seventeen lines, and the
auspices of Romulus in twenty lines. In it were narrated the mythical
events from the time
Quum veter occubuit Priamus sub marte Pelasgo,
to the death and deification of Romulus;
Romulus in caelo cum dis genitalibus aevum
Degit.
There is no allusion in these fragments to the Carthaginian adventures
of Aeneas, which Naevius had introduced into his poem on the First
Punic War. Aeneas seems at once to have been brought to Hesperia, a
land,
Quam prisci casci populi tenuere Latini.
Ilia is represented as the daughter of Aeneas. The birth and infancy
of Romulus and Remus appear to have been described at great length. In
commenting on Virgil's lines at Aeneid viii. 630--
Fecerat et viridi fetam Mavortis in antro
Procubuisse lupam: geminos huic ubera circum
Ludere pendentes pueros, et lambere matrem
Impavidos; illam tereti cervice reflexam
Mulcere alternos, et corpora fingere lingua,--
Servius says 'Sane totus hic locus Ennianus est.' The second and
third books contained the history of the remaining Roman kings. Virgil
imitated the description given in these books of the destruction of
Alba (the story of which is told by Livy also with much poetic power,
perhaps reproduced from the pages of Ennius), in his account of the
capture of Troy, at Aeneid ii. 486--
At domus interior gemitu miseroque tumultu, etc.
One short fragment of the third book contains a picturesque notice of
the founding of Ostia--
Ostia munita est; idem loca navibu' pulchris
Munda facit; nautisque mari quaesentibu' vitam.
This line also
Postquam lumina sis oculis bonus Ancu' reliquit
is familiar from its reappearance in one of the most impressive
passages of Lucretius.
The fourth and fifth books contained the history of the State from the
establishment of the Republic till just before the beginning of the
war with Pyrrhus. One short fragment is taken from the night attack of
the Gauls upon the Capitol. The sixth book was devoted to the war with
Pyrrhus; the seventh, eighth, and ninth, to the First and Second
Punic Wars. In the fragments of the sixth are found a few lines of the
speeches of Pyrrhus, and of Appius Claudius Caecus. In the account of
the First Punic War, the disparaging allusion to Naevius occurs--
Scripsere alii rem, etc.
It is mentioned by Cicero that Ennius borrowed much from the work of
Naevius; and also that he passed over (_reliquisse_) the First Punic
War, as it had been treated by his predecessor. Several fragments
however must certainly refer to this war; but it is probable that that
part of the subject was treated more cursorily than either the war
with Pyrrhus, or the later wars. The passage in which the poet is
supposed to have painted his own character, under the form of a friend
of Servilius Geminus, occurred in the seventh book. Two well-known
passages have been preserved from the ninth book--viz. that
characterising the 'sweet-speaking' orator, M. Cornelius Cethegus--
Flos delibatus populi suadaeque medulla,
and the lines in honour of Q. Fabius Maximus,
Unus homo nobis cunctando restituit rem, etc.
The tenth and eleventh books, beginning with a new invocation to the
muse--
Insece Musa manu Romanorum induperator
Quod quisque in bello gessit cum rege Philippo,
treated of the Macedonian war, and of the deeds of T. Quintius
Flamininus. In the later books, Ennius told the history of the war
with Antiochus, of the Aetolian War carried on by his friend, M.
Fulvius Nobilior, of the exploits of L. Caecilius Denter and his
brother (of whom scarcely anything is known except that the sixteenth
book of the Annals was written in consequence of the poet's especial
admiration for them), and lastly, of the Istrian War, which took place
within a few years of the author's death.
Neither in general design nor in detail could the Annals be regarded
as a pure epic poem. Like the Aeneid, which connects the mythical
story of Aeneas with the glories of the Julian line and the great
destiny of Rome, the poem of Ennius treated of fabulous tradition,
of historical fact, and of great contemporary events; but it did not,
like the Aeneid, unite these varied materials in the representation of
the fortunes of one individual hero. The action of the poem,
instead of being limited to a few days or months, extended over
many generations. Nor could the poem terminate with any critical
catastrophe, as its object was to unfold the continuous, still
advancing progress of the State. From the name it might be inferred
that the Annals must have been more like a metrical chronicle than
like an epic poem; yet, as being inspired and pervaded by a grand and
vital idea, the work was elevated above the level of matter of fact
into the region of poetry. The idea of a high destiny, unfolding
itself under the old kingly dynasty and the long line of
consuls,--through the successive wars with the Italian races, with
Pyrrhus and the Carthaginians,--rapidly advancing, though not fully
accomplished in the age when the poem was written,--gave unity of plan
and consistency of form to its rude and colossal structure. The word
Annales, as applied to Roman story, suggests something more than the
mere record of events in regular annual sequence. It involves also
the idea of unbroken continuity. In the Roman Republic, the unity
and vital action of the State were maintained and manifested by the
delegation of the functions of government on magistrates appointed
from year to year, just as the life of a monarchical state is
maintained and manifested in its line of kings. In the spirit
animating the work,--in the conception of a past history, stretching
back in unbroken grandeur until it is lost in fable, but yet vitally
linked to the interests of the present time,--the Annals of Ennius may
be compared with the dramas in which Shakspeare has represented the
national life of England--in all its greatness and vicissitudes--with
the glory and splendour as well as the dark and tragic colours with
which that story is inwoven.
The poem, although laying no claim to the perfection of epic form, had
thus something of the genuine epic inspiration. While treating both
of a mythical past and of real historical events, it was pervaded by a
living and popular idea,--faith in the destiny of Rome. It was through
the power and presence of that same idea in his own age, that
Virgil was able to impart a vital and enduring meaning to a fabulous
tradition, and to create, out of the imaginary fortunes of a Trojan
hero, a poem most truly representative of his age and country. It is
the absence of any such living idea which renders the artificial
epics of refined and civilised eras,--such poems, for instance, as the
_Thebais_ of Statius, or the _Argonautics_ of Valerius Flaccus,--in
general so flat and unprofitable. Regarded, on the other hand, as
a historical poem, the Annals was written under more favourable
conditions than the _Pharsalia_ of Lucan, or the _Punic Wars_ of
Silius Italicus--in being the work of an age to which the past
had come down as popular tradition, not as recorded history. The
imagination of the poet employs itself more happily and legitimately
in filling up or modifying a story that has been shaped by the fancies
and feelings of successive generations, than in venturing to recast
the facts that stand out prominently in the actual march of human
affairs. By treating of contemporary events, the poem must have
receded still further from the pure type of epic poetry; yet the later
fragments of the work, while written with something of the minute
and literal fidelity of a chronicle, may yet lay claim to poetic
inspiration. They prove that the author was no unconcerned spectator
and reporter of the events going on around him, but that his
imagination was fired and his sympathies keenly interested by
whatever, in speech or action, was worthy to live in the memory of the
world.
There must have been many drawbacks to the popularity of the poem in
a more critical time, when strong enthusiasm and forcible conception
fail to interest, unless they are combined with the harmonious
execution of a work of art. Even from the extant fragments the
rude proportions and the unwieldy mass of the original work may be
inferred. It is still possible to note the bare, annalistic style
of many passages which sink below the level of dignified prose, the
barbarisms of taste shown by a fondness for alliterative lines
and plays upon words, the more common faults of careless haste and
redundance of expression, and of a rugged and irregular cadence. There
must have been some peculiar excellences or adaptation to the Roman
taste, through which, in spite of these defects, the popularity of
the poem was sustained far into the times of the Empire. This
late popularity may have been due in part to antiquarian zeal or
affectation, but some degree of it, as well as the favour of the
age in which the poem was written, must have been founded on more
substantial grounds. Apart from other literary interest, this poem
first drew forth and established, for the contemplation of after
times, the ideal latent in the national mind. The patriotic tones of
Virgil have the same kind of ring as these in the older poet--
Audire est operae pretium procedere recte
Qui rem Romanam Latiumque augescere vultis,
and this other line which Cicero compared to the utterance of an
oracle--
Moribus antiquis stat res Romana virisque.
While in his other works Ennius was the teacher of an alien culture to
his countrymen, in his Annals he represented them. He set before them
an image of what was most real in themselves;--an image combining
the strength and commanding features of his own time, with the proud
memories and traditional traits of the past. As it is by sympathy with
what is most vital and of deepest meaning in actual experience that a
great poet forms his ideal of what transcends experience, so it is by
a vivid apprehension of the present that he is able to re-animate the
past. Dante and Milton gained their vision of other worlds through
their intense feeling of the spiritual meaning of this life; and, in
another sphere of art, Scott was enabled to immortalise the romance
and humour of past ages, partly through the chivalrous and adventurous
spirit which he inherited from them, partly through the strong
interest and enjoyment with which he entered into the actual life and
pursuits of his contemporaries. It is in ages of transition, such as
were the ages of Sophocles, of Shakspeare, and of Scott, in which the
traditions of the past seem to blend with and colour the activity and
enjoyment of a new time of great issues, that representative works of
genius are produced. Living in such an era, deeply moved by all
the memories, the hopes, and the impulses which acted upon his
contemporaries, living his own life happily and vigorously in the
chief centre of the world's activity, Ennius was enabled to gather the
life of centuries into one representation, and to tell the story
of Rome, if without the accomplished art, yet with something of
the native force and spirit of early Greece; to fix in language
the patriotic traditions which had hitherto been kept alive by the
statues, monuments, and commemorative ceremonies of earlier times; to
uphold the standard of national character with a fervent enthusiasm;
and to address the understanding of his contemporaries with a
practical wisdom like their own, and a large knowledge both of 'books
and men':--
Vetustas
Quem fecit mores veteresque novosque tenentem.
The manifest defects, as well as the peculiar power of the poem, show
how widely it departed from the standard of the Greek epic which it
professed to imitate. Its vast dimensions and solid structure are
proofs of that capacity of long labour and concentrated interest
on one great object, which was the secret of Roman success in other
spheres of action. So large a mass of materials held in union only by
a pervading national enthusiasm would have been utterly repugnant
to Greek taste, intolerant above all things of monotony, and most
exacting in its demands of artistic unity and completeness. The
fragments of the poem give no idea of careful finish; they produce
the impression of massiveness and energy, strength and uniformity of
structure, unaccompanied by beauty, grace, or symmetry. The creation
of an untutored age may be recognised in the rudeness of design,--of
a Roman mind in the national spirit, the colossal proportions, and the
strong workmanship of the poem.
The originality of the Roman epic will be still more apparent if we
compare the fragments of the Annals, in some points of detail, with
the complete works of the poet, whom Ennius regarded as his prototype.
There was, in the first place, a marked difference between Homer
and the Roman poet in their modes of representing human life and
character. The personages of the Iliad and of the Odyssey are living
and forcible types of individual character. In Achilles, in Hector,
and in Odysseus,--in Helen, Andromache, and Nausicaa, we recognise
embodiments the most real, yet the most transcendent, of the grandeur,
the heroism, the courage, and strong affection of manhood, and of the
grace, the gentleness, and the sweet vivacity of woman. The work of
Ennius, on the other hand, instead of presenting varied types of human
nature, appears to have unfolded a long gallery of national portraits.
The fragments of the poem still afford glimpses of the 'good Ancus';
'of the man of the great heart, the wise Aelius Sextus'; 'of the sweet
speaking orator,' Cethegus, 'the marrow of persuasion.' The stamp of
magnanimous fortitude is impressed on the fragmentary words of Appius
Claudius Caecus; and sagacity and resolution are depicted in the lines
which have handed down the fame of Fabius Maximus. This idea of the
poem, as unfolding the heroes of Roman story in regular series, may be
gathered also from the language of Cicero: 'Cato, the ancestor of our
present Cato, is extolled by him to the skies; the honour of the
Roman people is thereby enhanced: finally all those Maximi,
Fulvii, Marcelli, are celebrated with a glory in which we all
participate[41].' This portraiture of the kings and heroes of the
early time, of the orators, soldiers, and statesmen of the Republic,
could not have exhibited the variety, the energy, the passion, and all
the complex human attributes of Homer's personages. The men who stand
prominently out in the annals of Rome were of a more uniform type.
They were men of one common aim,--the advancement of Rome; animated
with one sentiment,--devotion to the State. All that was purely
personal in them seems merged in the traditional pictures which
express only the fortitude, dignity, and sagacity of the Republic.
Ennius also followed Homer in introducing the element of supernatural
agency into his poem. The action of the Annals, as well as of the
Iliad, was made partially dependent on a divine interference with
human affairs, though exercised less directly, and, as it were, from
a greater distance. Yet how great is the difference between the
life-like representation of the eager, capricious, and passionate
deities of Homer's Olympus and that outline which may still be traced
in Ennius, and which is seen filled up in Virgil and Horace, of the
gods assembled, like a grave council of state, to deliberate on the
destiny of Rome. In one fragment, containing the familiar line,--
Unus erit quem tu tolles in caerula caeli
Templa,--
they are introduced as debating, 'tectis bipatentibus,' on the
admission of Romulus into heaven. Again, in the account of the Second
Punic War, Jupiter is introduced as promising to the Romans the
destruction of Carthage; and Juno abandons her resentment against the
descendants of the Trojans,--
Romanis coepit Juno placata favere.
It may be remarked, as a strong proof of the hold which their
mythology had on the minds of the ancients, that men so sincere as
Ennius and Lucretius, while openly expressing opposition to that
system of religious belief, cannot separate themselves from its
influence and associations in their poetry. But it is not to be
supposed that Ennius, in the passages just referred to, was merely
using an artificial machinery to which he attached no meaning. In this
representation of the councils of the gods, he embodies that faith
in the Roman destiny, which was at the root of the most serious
convictions of the Romans, in the most sceptical as well as the most
believing ages of their history. This, too, is the real belief, which
gives meaning to the supernatural agency in the Aeneid. Aeneas is
an instrument in the hands of Fate; Jupiter merely foreknows and
pronounces its decrees; the parts assigned to Juno and Venus, in
thwarting and advancing these decrees, seem to be an artistic
addition to this original conception, suggested perhaps as much by the
experience of female influence and intrigue in the poet's own age as
by the memories of the Iliad.
Homer makes his personages known to us in speech as well as in action.
Among epic poets he alone possessed the finest dramatic genius. But
over and above the natural dialogue or soliloquy, in which every
feeling of his various personages is revealed, he has invested his
heroes with the charm of fluent and powerful oratory, in the council
of chiefs and before the assembled people. The words of his speakers
pour on, as he says of the words of Odysseus,--
[Greek: niphadessin eoikota cheimeriesi],
in the rapid vehemence of passion or the subtle fluency of persuasion.
The fragments of Ennius, on the other hand, scarcely afford sufficient
ground for attributing to him a genuine dramatic faculty. But, as the
citizen of a republic in which action was first matured in council,
and living in the age when public speech first became a recognised
power in the State, it was incumbent on him to embody in 'his abstract
and chronicle of the time' the speech of the orator no less than the
achievement of the soldier. In his estimate of character this power of
speech is honoured as the fitting accompaniment of the wisdom of
the statesman. In the following lines, for instance, he laments the
substitution of military for civil preponderance in public affairs.
Pellitur e medio sapientia, vi geritur res:
Spernitur orator bonus, horridu' miles amatur:
Haut doctis dictis certantes, sed maledictis
Miscent inter sese inimicitiam agitantes;
Non ex jure manu consertum, sed magi' ferro
Rem repetunt, regnumque petunt, vadunt solida vi[42].
Many lines of the Annals are evidently fragments of speeches. The most
remarkable of these passages is one from a speech of Pyrrhus, and
is characterised by Cicero as expressing 'sentiments truly regal
and worthy of the race of the Aeacidae[43].' This fragment, although
evincing nothing of the fluency, the passion, or the argumentative
subtlety of debate, yet suggests the power of a great orator by its
grave authoritative appeal to the moral dignity of man:--
Nec mi aurum posco, nec mi pretium dederitis:
Non cauponantes bellum, sed belligerantes,
Ferro non auro vitam cernamus utrique.
Vosne velit an me regnare era quidve ferat Fors,
Virtute experiamur. Et hoc simul accipe dictum:
Quorum virtutei belli fortuna pepercit,
Eorundem libertati me parcere certum est.
Dono ducite, doque volentibu' cum magnis dis[44].
Of the same severe and lofty tone is that appeal of Appius Claudius,
blind and in extreme old age, to the Senate, when wavering in its
resolution, and inclined to make peace with Pyrrhus:--
Quo vobis mentes rectae quae stare solebant
Antehac, dementes sese flexere viai[45]?
As Milton, in his representation of the great debate in Pandemonium,
idealised and glorified the stately and serious speech of his own
time, so Ennius, in his graphic delineation of the age in which he
lived, gave expression to that high magnanimous mood in accordance
with which the acts of Roman statesmen were assailed or vindicated,
and the policy of the State was shaped before Senate and people--
indu foro lato sanctoque senatu.
The great poets of human action and passion are for the most part to
be ranked among the great poets of the outward world. If they do not
seem to have penetrated with so much personal sympathy into the inner
secret of the life of Nature, as the great contemplative poets of
ancient and modern times, yet they show, in different ways, that their
sense and imagination were powerfully affected both by her outward
beauty and by her manifold energy. Homer, not so much by direct
description of the scenes in which the action of his poems is laid, as
by many indirect touches, by vivid imagery and picturesque epithets,
reveals the openness of his mind to every impression from the outward
world, and the fresh delight with which his imagination reproduced the
impressions immediately received from the 'world of eye and ear.' If
he has left any personal characteristic stamped upon his poetry, it is
the trace of adventure and keen enjoyment in the open air, among the
most stirring sights and sounds and forces of Nature. The imagery of
Virgil is of a more peaceful cast. It seems rather to be 'the harvest
of a quiet eye,' gathered in the conscious contemplation of rural
beauty, and stored up for after use along with the products of his
study and meditation. The fragments of Ennius, on the other hand,
afford few indications either of active toil and unconscious enjoyment
among the solitudes of Nature, or of the luxurious and pensive
susceptibility to beauty by which the poetry of Virgil is pervaded.
He was the poet, not of the woods and rivers, but, essentially, of the
city and the camp. No sentiment could appear less appropriate to him
than that of Virgil's modest prayer,--
Flumina amem silvasque inglorius.
Yet both in his illustrative imagery and in his narrative, he
occasionally reproduces with lively force, if not with much poetical
ornament, some aspects of the outward world, as well as many real
scenes from the world of action.
His imagery is sometimes borrowed from that of Homer; as, for
instance, the following simile, which is also imitated by Virgil:--
Et tum sic ut equus, qui de praesepibu' fartus,
Vincla suis magnis animis abrupit, et inde
Fert sese campi per caerula laetaque prata
Celso pectore, saepe jubam quassat simul altam,
Spiritus ex anima calida spumas agit albas[46].
Other illustrations are taken from circumstances likely to have
been familiar to the men of his own time, but without any apparent
intention of adding poetical beauty to the object he is representing.
Thus the silent expectation with which the assembled people watch the
rival auspices of Romulus and Remus is brought before the mind by an
illustration suggested by, and suggestive of, the passionate eagerness
with which the public games were witnessed by the Romans of his own
age:--
Expectant vel uti consul cum mittere signum
Volt, omnes avidi spectant ad carceris oras,
Quam mox emittat pictis e faucibu' currus[47].
There may be noticed also, in fragments of the narrative, occasional
expressions and descriptive touches implying some sense of what is
sublime or picturesque in the familiar aspects of the outward world.
The sky, with its starry host, is poetically presented in that
expression, which has been adopted by Virgil, 'stellis ingentibus
aptum'; and in the following line,
Vertitur interea caelum cum ingentibu' signis.
In the description of the auspices of Romulus, the scene is
enlivened by this vivid flash, 'simul aureus exoritur Sol,' following
instantaneously upon the appearance of the first bird of omen. A
lively sense of natural scenery is implied in these lines from the
dream of Ilia--
Nam me visus homo pulcher per amoena salicta
Et ripas raptare locosque novos;
in this description of a river, afterwards imitated both by Lucretius
and Virgil--
Quod per amoenam urbem leni fluit agmine flumen;
and in these lines which recall a familiar passage in the Aeneid:--
Jupiter hic risit tempestatesque serenae
Riserunt omnes risu Jovis omnipotentis.[48]
The rhythm and the diction of these fragments suggest another point
of contrast between the father of Greek and the father of Roman
literature. For the old Saturnian verse of the Fauns and Bards, which
had been employed by Livius Andronicus and Naevius, Ennius substituted
the heroic hexameter, which he moulded to the use of Roman poetry,
with little art and grace, but with much energy and weight. As he
imitated the metre of Homer, he has in several places (as in a simile
already quoted, and again in describing the conduct of a brave tribune
in the Istrian war), attempted to reproduce his language. Nothing,
however, can show more clearly the vast original difference between
the genius of Greece and of Rome than the contrast presented between
the rhythm and style of their earliest epic poets. In regard for law
and civil order, in military and political organisation, in practical
power of understanding, and in the command which that power gave them
over the world, the Romans of the second century B.C. had made a great
and permanent advance beyond the Greeks of the time of Homer. But the
Greeks, when they first become known to us, appear in possession of
a gift to which all later generations have been unable to attain. The
genius of poetry has never, since the time of Homer, appeared in union
with a faculty of expression so true and spontaneous, so faultless in
purity, so inexhaustible in resources. It is difficult to imagine a
greater contrast than that between the varied and harmonious power
of the earliest Greek epic, and the rugged rhythm and diction of
the Annals. Yet the very rudeness of that work is significant of
the energy of a man who had to accomplish a gigantic task by his own
unaided efforts. His ear had not been passively trained by the musical
echoes transmitted by earlier minstrels; nor did he inherit the
fluency and richness of expression which a long line of poets hands on
to their successors. While professing to imitate the structure of the
Homeric verse, he was unable to seize its finer cadences. Nor had
he learned the stricter conditions under which that metre could be
adapted to the powerful and weighty movement of the Latin language.
If he did much to establish Latin prosody on principles deviating
considerably from those observed by the contemporary comic poets,
yet many points which were regulated unalterably for Virgil were
left quite unsettled by Ennius. There are found occasionally in these
fragments lines without any _caesura_ before the fifth foot, as the
following, in one of the longest and least imperfect of his remains--
Corde capessere: semita nulla pedem stabilibat.
and this in a passage in which the sound seems intended to imitate the
sense--
Poste recumbite vestraque pectora pellite tonsis.
And though such marked violations of harmony are rare, yet there is a
large proportion of lines in which the laws for the caesura observed
by later poets are violated. Again, while the final 's' is in most
cases not sounded before a word beginning with a consonant (a usage
which finally disappears only in the Augustan poets) the final 'm,' on
the other hand, is sometimes left without elision before a vowel, as
in the following line--
Miscent inter sese inimicitiam agitantes.
The quantity of syllables and the inflexions of words were so far
unsettled, that such lines as the following are read,
Partem fuisset de summis rebu' regendis;
and this,
Noenum rumores ponebat ante salutem;
and
Volturus in spinis miserum mandebat homonem.
Among the ruder characteristics of his diction, his use of prosaic and
technical terms is especially to be noticed. The following lines, for
instance, read more like the bare statement of a chronicle, or of a
legal document, than an extract from a poetical narrative:--
Cives Romani tunc facti sunt Campani;
and this
Appius indixit Karthaginiensibu' bellum;
and these lines enumerating the various priesthoods established by
Numa,--
Volturnalem Palatualem Furrinalem
Floralemque Falacrem et Pomonalem fecit
Hic idem.
Yet, in spite of these imperfections, both his rhythm and language
produce the impression of power and originality. With all the
roughness and irregularity of his measure, and notwithstanding the
inharmonious structure of continuous passages, his lines often have a
weighty and impressive effect, like that produced by some of the great
passages in Lucretius and Virgil. It is said of the rhetorician Aelian
that he excessively admired in Ennius both 'the greatness of his
mind and the grandeur of his metre[49].' Something of this sonorous
grandeur may be recognised in a fragment descriptive of the havoc made
by woodcutters in a great forest,--a passage in which the language of
Ennius again appears as a connecting link between that of Homer and of
Virgil:--
Incedunt arbusta per alta, securibu' caedunt,
Percellunt magnas quercus, exciditur ilex,
Fraxinu' frangitur, atque abies consternitur alta.
Pinus proceras pervortunt: omne sonabat
Arbustum fremitu siluai frondosai[50].
In the longest consecutive passages,--the dream of Ilia, the auspices
of Romulus, and that from book seventh, already quoted as illustrative
of the poet's character,--there is, notwithstanding the roughness of
the lines, something also of Homeric rapidity;--a quality which the
Latin hexameter never afterwards attained in elevated poetry.
The diction also of the Annals is generally fresh and forcible,
sometimes vividly imaginative. But perhaps the most admirable quality
of its style is a grave simplicity and sincerity of tone. Especially
is this the case in passages expressing appreciation of strength and
grandeur of character, as in those fragments from the speeches of
Pyrrhus and of Appius Claudius Caecus, already quoted, and in the
famous lines commemorative of the resolute character and momentous
services of Fabius Maximus:--
Unus homo nobis cunctando restituit rem:
Noenum rumores ponebat ante salutem:
Ergo plusque magisque viri nunc gloria claret[51].
These lines leave on the mind the same impression of antique
majesty, as is produced by the unadorned record of character and work
accomplished inscribed on the tombs of the Scipios.
This truly Roman quality of style, depending on a strong imaginative
sense of reality, is one of the great elements of power in the
language of Lucretius.
III. CHIEF CHARACTERISTICS OF HIS GENIUS AND INTELLECT.
III.--From a review of the extant fragments both of the Tragedies and
the Annals of Ennius, it appears that his prominent place in Roman
literature, and influence over his countrymen, were due much more to
a great productiveness and activity, and to an original force of mind
and character, than to any artistic skill displayed in the conception
or execution of his works. A consideration of the spirit and purpose
of his greatest works has led to the conclusion that they were, in a
considerable measure, inspired by the genius of Rome, and were thus
rather the starting-point of a new literature than the mechanical
reproduction of the literature of the Greeks. It remains to consider
what inference may be formed from these fragments as to the character
of his genius, of his imaginative sentiment and moral sympathies, and
of his intellectual power.
The force of many single expressions in these fragments, and the power
with which various incidents, situations, and characters, are brought
before the mind indicate an active imagination. A sense of energy and
life-like movement is the prevailing impression produced by a study
of the language and the longer passages in these remains. Many single
lines and expressions that have been gathered accidentally, as mere
isolated phrases, disjoined from the context in which they originally
occurred, bear traces of the ardour with which they were cast into
shape. In longer passages, the whole heart, sense, and understanding
of the writer seem to be thrown into his narrative. He has not the
eye of a poetic artist who observes, as it were, from a distance,
and fixes as in a picture, some phase of passionate feeling or some
beautiful aspect of repose. He suggests rather the idea of a man of
practical energy, who has been present and taken part in the action
described, who enters with living interest into every detail, and
watches it at the same time with a sagacious discernment and a strong
enthusiasm. His power as a narrative poet is the power of forcibly
reproducing the outward movement and the inward meaning of an action,
and of identifying himself with the hearts and minds of the actors on
the scene. Several passages, wanting altogether in poetical beauty,
yet arrest the attention by this energy and realism of conception;
as, for example, this short and rugged fragment, descriptive of
a commander in the crisis of a battle (probably that of
Cynoscephalae),--
Aspectabat virtutem legioni' suai,
Expectans, si mussaret, quae denique pausa
Pugnandi fieret, aut duri fini' laboris[52].
Even in the abrupt dislocation from their context these lines leave on
the mind an impression of the calm vigilance of a general, and of his
confidence, not unmixed with anxiety, in 'the long-enduring hearts' of
his men. The same truth and energy of conception, with more poetical
accompaniment, may be recognised in the longer passages, from Book
vii. and Book i., already quoted or referred to.
But the imaginative power which gives poetical meaning to familiar
objects and ideas is revealed by the force of many single expressions
and by the delineation of more passionate situations. Such expressions
as the following, most of which reappear with an antique lustre in the
gold of Virgil's diction, are indicative of this higher power:--
Musae quae pedibus magnum pulsatis Olympum.
Transnavit cita per teneras caliginis auras.
Postquam discordia taetra
Belli ferratos postes portasque refregit.
Quem super ingens
Porta tonat caeli.
Spiritus austri imbricitor. Naves velivolae, etc. etc.
These and similar phrases, some of which have already been quoted,
imply poetical creativeness. They tend to justify the estimate of the
genius of Ennius, indicated in the language of high admiration applied
to him by Lucretius,--
Ennius ut noster cecinit, qui primus amoeno
Detulit ex Helicone perenni fronde coronam,
Per gentes Italas hominum quae clara clueret[53];
and in the signs of the careful study of the Annals which may be
traced in the elaborate workmanship of the Aeneid.
The longest specimen of narrative vivified by poetical feeling, from
the hand of Ennius, is the passage in which the vestal Ilia relates to
her sister the dream that portended her great and strange destiny:--
Excita cum tremulis anus attulit artubu' lumen,
Talia commemorat lacrimans, exterrita somno.
Eurudica prognata, pater quam noster amavit,
Vires vitaque corpu' meum nunc deserit omne.
Nam me visus homo pulcher per amoena salicta
Et ripas raptare locosque novos; ita sola
Postilla, germana soror, errare videbar
Tardaque vestigare et quaerere te neque posse
Corde capessere: semita nulla pedem stabilibat.
Exin compellare pater me voce videtur
His verbis: 'O gnata, tibi sunt ante ferendae
Aerumnae, post ex fluvio fortuna resistet.'
Haec ecfatu' pater, germana, repente recessit
Nec sese dedit in conspectum, corde cupitus,
Quanquam multa manus ad caeli caerula templa
Tendebam lacrimans et blanda voce vocabam:
Vix aegro cum corde meo me somnu' reliquit[54].
Though these lines are rough and inharmonious as compared with the
rhythm of Catullus or Virgil, yet they flow more smoothly and rapidly
than any of the other fragments preserved from Ennius. The impression
of gentleness and tender affection produced by the speech of Ilia,
implies some dramatic skill in the conception of character. And there
is real imaginative power shown in the sense of hurry and surprise, of
vague awe and helplessness conveyed in the lines--
Nam me visus homo pulcher per amoena salicta, etc.
From this passage Virgil has borrowed one of the finest touches in his
delineation of the passion of Dido, the sense of horror and desolation
haunting the Carthaginian queen in her dreams--
Agit ipse furentem
In somnis ferus Aeneas: semperque relinqui
Sola sibi, semper longam incomitata videtur
Ire viam, et Tyrios deserta quaerere terra.
Another of the most impressive passages in the early books of the
Aeneid--the dream in which Hector appears to Aeneas[55]--was evidently
suggested by the description which Ennius gave of the appearance of
the shade of Homer to himself. Some of his dramatic fragments,
also, as for instance the scene between Hecuba and Cassandra already
referred to, show a real power of conceiving and representing
passionate situations.
Among the modes of imaginative sentiment by which the poetry of
Ennius is pervaded, those kindled by patriotic enthusiasm are most
conspicuous. In the manifestation of his enthusiasm, he shows an
affinity to Virgil in ancient, and to Scott in modern times. He
resembles them in their mingled feelings of veneration and affection
which they entertain towards the national heroes of old times, and
the great natural features of their country, associated with historic
memories and legendary renown. Such feelings are shown by Ennius in
the lines of tender regret and true hero-worship, which express the
sorrow of Senate and people at the death of Romulus--
Pectora ... tenet desiderium, simul inter
Sese sic memorant, O Romule, Romule die
Qualem te patriae custodem di genuerunt!
O pater, O genitor, O sanguen dis oriundum!
Tu produxisti nos intra luminis oras[56].
They appear also in the language applied by him to the sacred river
of Rome, which had preserved the founder of the city from his untimely
fate, and which was thus inseparably identified with the national
destiny--
Teque pater Tiberine tuo cum flumine sancto.
and also in this fragment--
Postquam consistit fluvius qui est omnibu' princeps
Qui sub caeruleo.
The enumeration of the great warlike races in the line
Marsa manus, Peligna cohors, Vestina virum vis,
may recall the pride and enthusiasm which are kindled in the heart
of Virgil by the names of the various tribes of Italy, and of
places renowned for their fame in story, or their picturesque
environment[57]. This fond use of proper names recalling old
associations or the charm of natural scenery is also among the most
familiar characteristics of the poetry of Scott.
It was seen in the introductory chapter that the Roman mind was
peculiarly susceptible of that kind of feeling, which perhaps may best
be described as the sense of majesty. This vein of poetical emotion is
also conspicuous in the fragments of Ennius. His language shows a deep
sense of greatness and order, both in the material world and in human
affairs. Thus his style appears animated not only by vital force, but
by an impressive solemnity, befitting the grave and dignified emotion
which responds to such ideas. This susceptibility of his genius
appears in such expressions as these--
Magnum pulsatis Olympum. Indu mari magno.
Litora lata sonant.
Latos per populos terrasque.
Magnae gentes opulentae.
Quis potis ingentis oras evolvere belli?
Vertitur interea caelum cum ingentibu' signis;
and again in the following--
Indu foro lato sanctoque senatu.
Augusto augurio postquam incluta condita Roma est.
Omnibu' cura viris uter esset induperator,
and in the epithet which Cicero quotes as applied to cities--
Urbes magnas atque _imperiosas_.
His imagination appears also to have been impressed by that sense of
outward pomp and magnificence which exercised a strong spell on the
Roman mind in all ages, and obtained its most complete and permanent
realisation in the architecture of the Empire. A short passage from
one of his tragedies, the Andromache, may be quoted as illustrative of
this influence, even in the writings of Ennius, though naturally it
is much more apparent in the style of those poets who witnessed the
grandeur of Rome in her later era:--
O pater, O patria, O Priami domus,
Saeptum altisono cardine templum!
Vidi ego te, astante ope barbarica,
Tectis caelatis, lacuatis,
Auro ebore instructum regifice![58]
While his peculiar poetical feeling is present chiefly in the
fragments of the Annals, the moral elements of his poetry may be
gathered both from his epic and dramatic remains. Strength and dignity
of character are the qualities with which his own nature was most
in sympathy. Yet in delineating the agitation of Ilia, the shame
of Cassandra, and the sorrow of Andromache, he reveals also much
tenderness of feeling,--the not unusual accompaniment of the manly
genius of Rome. A similar tenderness is found in union with the grave
tones of Pacuvius and Accius, and in still greater measure with
the fortitude of Lucretius and the majesty of Virgil. The masculine
qualities which most stir his enthusiasm are the Roman virtues of
resolution (constantia), sincerity, magnanimity, capacity for affairs.
Thus a latent glow of feeling may be discerned in the lines which
record the brave resolution of the Roman people during the first
hardships of the war with Pyrrhus--
Ast animo superant atque aspera prima
Volnera belli dispernunt[59];
and in this strong and scornful triumph over natural sorrow, from the
Telamon:--
Ego cum genui tum morituros scivi, et ei rei sustuli:
Praeterea ad Trojam cum misi ob defendendam Graeciam,
Scibam me in mortiferum bellum, non in epulas mittere[60].
The generosity and courage of a magnanimous nature are stamped upon
the kingly speech which he puts into the mouth of Pyrrhus. A frank
sincerity of character reveals itself in such passages as the
following:--
Eo ego ingenio natus sum,
Aeque inimicitiam atque amicitiam in frontem promptam gero[61].
There is no subtlety nor rhetorical point in the expression of his
serious convictions. The very style of the tragedies, which, as Cicero
says[62], 'does not depart from the natural order of the words,' is a
symbol of frankness and straightforwardness.
He shows also, in his delineations of character, high appreciation of
practical wisdom, and of its most powerful instrument in a free State,
the persuasive power of oratory. This appreciation is expressed in
the lines so much admired by Cicero and Aulus Gellius[63], though
ridiculed by the purism of Seneca:--
Is dictus 'st ollis popularibus olim
Qui tum vivebant homines, atque aevum agitabant,
Flos delibatus populi suadaeque medulla[64].
He seems to admire the sterling qualities of character and intellect
rather than the brilliant manifestations of impulse and genius. He
celebrates the heroism of brave endurance rather than of chivalrous
daring[65]: the fortitude that, in the long run, wins success, and
saves the State[66], rather than the impetuous valour which achieves
a barren glory; the sincerity and simplicity which are stronger
than art, yet that know when to speak and when to be silent[67]; the
sagacity which enables men to understand their circumstances, and to
turn them to the best account[68].
Many of his fragments, again, show traces of that just and vigorous
understanding of human life, and that shrewdness of observation, which
constitute a great satirist. The didactic tone of satire appears, for
instance, in the following lines--
Otioso in otio animus nescit quid velit;
Hic itidem est: enim neque domi nunc nos neque militiae sumus,
Imus huc, illuc hinc, cum illuc ventum est, ire illinc lubet;
Incerte errat animus: praeter propter vitam vivitur[69],--
a fragment which might be compared with certain passages in the
Epistles of Horace, which give expression to the _ennui_ experienced
as a result of the inaction and luxurious living of the Augustan age.
But a closer parallel will be found in a passage where Lucretius has
assumed something of the caustic tone of Roman satire--
Exit saepe foras magnis ex aedibus ille
Esse domi quem pertaesum 'st subitoque revertit,
Quippe domi nihilo melius qui sentiat esse, etc.[70]
While Ennius, like Lucretius, gives little indication of humour, yet
the folly and superstition of his times provoke him into tones of
contemptuous irony, especially where he has to expose the arts of
false prophets and fortune-tellers. The men of the manliest temper and
the strongest understanding in ancient times were most intolerant of
this mischievous form of imposture and credulity. Thus Thucydides,
in general so reserved in his expression of personal feeling, treats,
with a manifest irony, all supernatural pretences to foresee
or control the future. The tone in which Ennius writes of such
professions reminds us of Milton's grim contempt for
Eremites and friars
White, black, and grey, with all their trumpery.
Thus, in a fragment of Book xi. of the Annals, the fears excited
by the prophets and diviners at the commencement of the war with
Antiochus are encountered with the pertinent question--
Satin' vates verant aetate in agenda?
Thus too the pretensions and the ignorance of astrologers are exposed
in a line of one of the dramas--
Quod est ante pedes nemo spectat: caeli scrutantur plagas.
And the following passage may be quoted as applicable to charlatans of
every kind, in every age and country--
Sed superstitiosi vates, impudentesque arioli,
Aut inertes aut insani, aut quibus egestas imperat,
Qui sibi semitam non sapiunt, alteri monstrant viam,
Quibus divitias pollicentur, ab eis drachmam ipsi petunt[71].
There are passages of the same spirit to be found among the fragments
of Pacuvius and Accius.
There is not much indication of speculative thought in any of these
fragments. The blunt sentiment which Ennius puts into the mouth of
Neoptolemus probably expressed his own mental attitude towards the
schools of philosophy--
Philosophari est mihi necesse, at paucis: nam omnino haut placet.
His observations on life are neither of an imaginative, of a deeply
reflective, nor of a purely satiric character. Unlike the thoughts of
the Greek dramatists, they make no attempt to solve the painful riddle
of the world; they want the universality and systematic basis of
philosophical truths; they are expressed neither with the pointed
wit nor with the ironical humour of satire. They are the maxims of
a strong common sense and the dictates of a grave rectitude of will.
They are practical, not speculative. They have their origin in a sense
of duty rather than of consequences. They are in conformity with the
ideal realised in the best types of Roman character; and they bear
witness to the sterling worth combined with the ardent enthusiasm, and
the practical sense united to the strong imagination of the poet.
Such appear to be the chief attributes of genius and imaginative
sentiment, and the chief moral and intellectual features indicated in
the fragments of Ennius. It is not indeed possible, from the tenor of
single passages, to judge of the composition of a whole drama or of
a continuous book of the Annals. No single scene or speech can afford
sufficient grounds for inferring the amount of creative power with
which his characters were conceived and sustained in all their complex
relations. Yet enough has appeared in these fragments, which, from
the accidental mode of their preservation, must be regarded as the
ordinary samples and not chosen specimens of his style, to confirm
the ancient belief in his pre-eminence and to determine the prevailing
characteristics of his genius. There is ample evidence of the great
popularity which he enjoyed among his countrymen, and of the high
estimate which many of the best Roman writers formed of his power. It
is recorded that great crowds ('magna frequentia') attended the public
reading of the Annals. Virgil was said to have introduced many lines
into the Aeneid, with the view of pleasing a public devoted to Ennius
('populus Ennianus'). The title of Ennianista was assumed by a public
reader of the Annals in the time of Hadrian, when there was a strong
revival of admiration for the older literature of Rome[72]. Cicero
often speaks of the poet as 'noster Ennius,' and quotes him with all
the signs of hearty admiration and affection. The numerous references
in his works to the Annals and the Tragedies imply also a thorough
familiarity with these poems on the part of the readers for whom his
philosophical and rhetorical treatises were written. The criticism of
Quintilian, 'Ennium sicut sacros vetustate lucos adoremus, in quibus
grandia et antiqua robora jam non tantam habent speciem quantam
religionem[73],' expresses a sentiment of traditional reverence as
well as of personal appreciation. Aulus Gellius, a writer of the time
of Hadrian, often quotes and comments upon him with hearty and genial
sympathy. The greatest among the Roman poets also, directly and
indirectly, acknowledge their admiration. The strong testimony of
Lucretius is alone sufficient to establish the fame of Ennius as a man
of remarkable force and genius. The spirit of the Annals still lives
in the antique charm and national feeling which make the epic poem
of Virgil the truest representation of Roman sentiment which has come
down to modern times. By Ovid he is characterised as--
Ennius, ingenio maximus, arte rudis.
Horace, although more reluctant and grudging in his admiration, yet
allows the 'Calabrian Muse' to be the best preserver of the fame of
the great Scipio. Even the disparaging lines--
Ennius et sapiens et fortis et alter Homerus,
Ut critici dicunt, leviter curare videtur
Quo promissa cadant et somnia Pythagorea[74],
are a strong testimony in favour of the esteem in which the vigour and
sagacity of Ennius were held by those who had all his works in their
hands. As one of the founders of Roman literature, it was impossible
that he could have rivalled the careful and finished style of the
Augustan poets; but, by his rude and energetic labours, he laid the
strong groundwork on which later poets built their fame.
He has been exposed to more serious detraction in modern times, as
the corrupter of the pure stream of early Roman poetry. It is alleged
against him by Niebuhr, that through jealousy he suppressed the ballad
and epic poetry of the early bards. The answer to this charge has
already been given. There is no evidence to prove that any such poems
were in existence in the time of Ennius. By other modern scholars
he is disadvantageously compared with Naevius, who is held up to
admiration as the last of the genuine Roman minstrels. Naevius appears
indeed to have been a remarkable and original man, yet his very scanty
fragments do not afford sufficient evidence to justify the reversal of
the verdict of antiquity on the relative greatness and importance of
the two poets. The old Roman party, in opposition to whom Ennius
and his friends are supposed to have introduced the new taste and
suppressed the old, never showed any zeal in favour of poetry of any
kind. Cato, their only literary representative, wrote prose treatises
on antiquities and agriculture, and in one of his speeches reproached
Fulvius Nobilior for the consideration which he showed to Ennius. The
evidence of these epic and dramatic fragments which have just been
considered, is all in favour of the high verdict of antiquity on the
importance and pre-eminence of the author of the Annals. Whatever in
the later poets is most truly Roman in sentiment and morality appears
to be conceived in the spirit of Ennius.
[Footnote 1: Parco admodum sumptu contentus et unius ancillae
ministerio.]
[Footnote 2: xvii. 17.]
[Footnote 3: The line--
Ad patrios montes et ad incunabula nostra,
which is quoted by Cicero in a letter to Atticus, and which
Vahlen attributed to Ennius, is now generally assigned to
Cicero himself.]
[Footnote 4: Livy xxxviii. 17.]
[Footnote 5: 'When the Carthaginians were coming from all
sides to the conflict, and all things, beneath high heaven,
confounded by the hurry and tumult of war, shook with alarm:
and men were in doubt to which of the two the empire of the
whole world, by land and sea, should fall.'--Lucret. iii.
834-7.]
[Footnote 6: Mommsen, book iii. ch. 5.]
[Footnote 7: The author of Caesar's Spanish War quotes
Ennius in his account of the critical moment in the Battle
of Munda:--'Hic, ut ait Ennius, "pes pede premitur, armis
teruntur arma."'--Bell. Hisp. xxxi.]
[Footnote 8: Amphit. 52-3--
Quid contraxistis frontem, quia tragoediam
Dixi futuram hanc?]
[Footnote 9: Graecia capta ferum victorem cepit, etc.]
[Footnote 10: De Senectute, 5.]
[Footnote 11: De Oratore, ii. 68.]
[Footnote 12: 'L. Aelium Stilonem dicere solitum ferunt Q.
Ennium de semet ipso haec scripsisse, picturamque istam morum
et ingenii ipsius Q. Ennii factam esse.'--Gell. xii. 4.]
[Footnote 13: 'He finished: and summons to him one with whom
often, and right gladly, he shared his table, his talk, and
the whole weight of his business, when weary with debate,
throughout the day, on high affairs of state, within the wide
Forum and the august Senate,--one to whom he could frankly
speak out serious matters, trifles, and jest; to whom he could
pour forth and safely confide, if he wanted to confide in any
one, all that he cared to utter, good or bad; with whom,
in private and in public, he had much entertainment and
enjoyment,--a man of that nature which no thought ever prompts
to baseness through levity or malice: a learned, honest,
pleasant man, eloquent, contented, and cheerful, of much tact,
speaking well in season; courteous and of few words; with much
old buried lore; whom length of years had made versed in old
and recent ways; in the laws of many ancients, divine and
human; one who knew when to speak and when to be silent. Him,
during the battle, Servilius thus addresses.']
[Footnote 14: [Greek: Skipiona gar adon kai epi mega ton andra
exarai boulomenos phesi monon an Homeron epaxious epainous
eipein Skipionos.]--Aelian, as quoted by Suidas, vol. i. p.
1258. Ed. Gaisford. Cf. Vahlen.]
[Footnote 15: 'Here is he laid, to whom no one, either
countryman or enemy, has been able to pay a due meed for his
services.']
[Footnote 16: 'From the utmost east, beyond the Maeotian
marsh, there is no one who in actions can vie with me. If it
is lawful for any one to ascend to the realms of the gods, to
me alone the vast gate of heaven is opened!']
[Footnote 17: 'Yet nothing more glorious than this man doth it
(the island of Sicily) seem to have contained, nor aught more
holy, nor more wonderful and beloved.']
[Footnote 18: 'Behold, my countrymen, the bust of the old man,
Ennius. He penned the record of your fathers' mighty deeds.
Let no one pay to me the meed of tears, nor weep at my
funeral. And why? because I still live, as I speed to and fro,
through the mouths of men.']
[Footnote 19: 'Hail, poet Ennius, who pledgest to mortals thy
fiery verse from thy inmost marrow.']
[Footnote 20: 'Others have treated the subject in the verses,
which in days of old the Fauns and bards used to sing, before
any one had climbed the cliffs of the Muses, or gave any care
to style.']
[Footnote 21: 'I have always said and will say that the gods
of heaven exist, but I think that they heed not the conduct of
mankind; for, if they did, it would be well with the good and
ill with the bad; and it is not so now.']
[Footnote 22:
Cor jubet hoc Enni, postquam destertuit esse
Maeonides, Quintus pavone ex Pythagoreo.
Persius, vi. 10 (ed. Jahn).]
[Footnote 23: Vahlen.]
[Footnote 24: Horace, Sat. ii. 4.]
[Footnote 25: 'The poetical philosophy, which the later
Pythagoreans had extracted from the writings of the old
Sicilian comedian, Epicharmus of Megara, or rather had, at
least for the most part, circulated under cover of his name,
regarded the Greek gods as natural substances, Zeus as
the atmosphere, the soul as a particle of Sun-dust, and so
forth.'--Mommsen's Hist. of Rome, Book iii. ch. 15. (Dickson's
Translation.)]
[Footnote 26: 'This is that Jupiter which I speak of,
which the Greeks call the air; it is first wind and clouds;
afterwards rain, and after rain, cold; next it becomes wind,
then air again. All those things which I mention to you are
Jupiter, because it is he who supports mortals and cities and
all animals.']
[Footnote 27: Mommsen.]
[Footnote 28: 'Inventore minor.'--Horace.]
[Footnote 29: Another passage, ascribed to Ennius, descriptive
of the greed of a parasite, occupies the ground common to
Roman comedy and to Roman satire:--
Quippe sine cura laetus lautus cum advenis
Insertis malis, expedito bracchio
Alacer, celsus, lupino expectans impetu,
Mox cum alterius obligurias bona,
Quid censes domino esse animi? pro divum fidem!
Ille tristis cibum dum servat, tu ridens voras.]
[Footnote 30: The meaning of the passage amounts to no more
than this, that the man who tries to 'sell' another, and
fails, is himself 'sold.']
[Footnote 31: Brutus, 20.]
[Footnote 32: De Fin. i. 2.]
[Footnote 33: Cf. Eur. Med. 1-8:--
[Greek:
Eith' ophel' Argous me diaptasthai skaphos
Kolchon es aian kyaneas Symplegadas,
med' en napaisi Peliou pesein pote
tmetheisa peuke, med' eretmosai cheras
andron aristeon, hoi to panchryson deros
Pelia metelthon; ou gar an despoin' eme
Medeia pyrgous ges epleus' Iolkias
eroti thymon ekplageis' Iasonos.]]
[Footnote 34: Several of these fragments will be examined
later.]
[Footnote 35: Tusc. Disp. ii. 16.]
[Footnote 36: 'How tender, how true to character, how
affecting!'--De Div. i. 31. 'What a great poet, though he is
despised by those admirers of Euphorion. He understands that
sudden and unlooked-for calamities are more grievous. A noble
poem,--pathetic in its matter, language, and music.'--Tusc.
Disp. iii. 19.]
[Footnote 37: 'Here it is; here, the torch, wrapped in fire
and blood. Many years it hath lain hid; help, citizens, and
extinguish it. For now, on the great sea, a swift fleet is
gathering. It hurries along a host of calamities. They come: a
fierce host lines the shores with sail-winged ships.' Exitium
= exitiorum; cf. Cic. Orator. 46, Itaque idem poeta, qui
inusitatius contraxerat 'Patris mei meum factum pudet' pro
'meorum factorum' et 'Texitur: exitium examen rapit' pro
'exitiorum.']
[Footnote 38: Acad. ii. 28.]
[Footnote 39: Gellius, xvii. 21.]
[Footnote 40: He speaks of Eurydice as the wife of Aeneas.
This statement he is supposed to have derived from the
_Cypria_.]
[Footnote 41: Cicero, Arch. 9.]
[Footnote 42: 'Wisdom is banished from amongst us, violence
rules the day: the good orator is despised, the rough soldier
loved; striving, not with words of learning, but with words of
hate, they get embroiled in feuds, and stir up enmity one with
another. They challenge not their adversaries to contend by
forms of law, but claim their rights by the sword, and aim at
sovereign power, and make their way by sheer force.']
[Footnote 43: Cic. De Off. i. 12.]
[Footnote 44: 'Neither do I ask gold for myself, nor offer ye
to me a ransom. Let us wage the war, not like hucksters, but
like soldiers--with the sword, not with gold, putting our
lives to the issue. Whether our mistress Fortune wills that
you or I should reign, or what her purpose be, let us prove by
valour. And hearken too to this saying,--The brave men, whom
the fortune of battle spares, their liberty I have resolved to
spare. Take my offer, as I grant it, under favour of the great
gods.']
[Footnote 45: 'Whither have your minds, which heretofore were
wont to stand firm, madly swerved from the straight course?']
[Footnote 46: A comparison with the original passage (Iliad
vi. 506) will show that Ennius, while reproducing much, though
not all, of the force and life of Homer's image, has added
also some touches of his own:--
[Greek:
hos d' hote tis statos hippos, akostesas epi phatne,
desmon aporrhexas theie pedioio kroainon,
eiothos louesthai eurrheios potamoio,
kydioon; hypsou de kare echei, amphi de chaitai
omois aissontai; ho d' aglaiephi pepoithos,
rhimpha he gouna pherei meta t' ethea kai nomon hippon.]
Cf. Virgil, Aen. xi. 492:--
Qualis ubi abruptis fugit praesepia vinclis
Tandem liber equus, campoque potitus aperto
Aut ille in pastus armentaque tendit equarum,
Aut adsuetus aquae perfundi flumine noto
Emicat, arrectisque fremit cervicibus alte
Luxurians, luduntque jubae per colla, per armos.]
[Footnote 47: 'They watch, as when the consul is going to give
the signal, all look eagerly to the barrier, to see how soon
he may start the chariots from the painted entrance.']
[Footnote 48:
Olli subridens hominum sator atque deorum
Voltu, quo caelum tempestatesque serenat.--Aen. i. 254.]
[Footnote 49: [Greek: Ennios Rhomaios poietes; hon Ailianos
epainein axion phesi.... delon de hos etethepei tou poietou
ten megalonoian kai ton metron to megaleion kai axiagaston.]
Suidas, vol i. p. 1258, ed. Gaisford.]
[Footnote 50: Cf. Iliad xxiii. 114-120; and also Virgil, Aen.
vi. 179:--
Itur in antiquam silvam, stabula alta ferarum,
Procumbunt piceae, sonat icta securibus ilex,
Fraxineaeque trabes cuneis et fissile robur
Scinditur, advolvunt ingentis montibus ornos.]
[Footnote 51: 'One man, by biding his time, restored the
commonwealth. He cared not for what men said of him, as
compared with our safety: therefore now his fame waxeth
brighter day by day.']
[Footnote 52: 'He watched the courage of his army, to see if
any murmur should arise for some pause to the long battle,
some rest from their weary toil.']
[Footnote 53: 'As sang our Ennius, the first who brought down
from beautiful Helicon a chaplet of unfading leaf, the fame
of which should be bruited loud through the nations of Italian
men.']
[Footnote 54: 'When the old dame had risen, and with trembling
limbs had brought the light, thus she (Ilia), roused in
terror from her sleep, with tears tells her tale: "Daughter of
Eurydice, whom our father loved, my strength and life now fail
me through all my frame. For methought that a goodly man was
bearing me off through the pleasant willow-groves, by the
river-banks, and places strange to me. Thereafter, O my
sister, I seemed to be wandering all alone, and with slow
steps to track my way, to be seeking thee, and to be unable
to find thee near; no footpath steadied my step. Afterwards
methought I heard my father address me in these
words--'Daughter, trouble must first be borne by thee;
afterwards thy fortune shall rise up again from the river.'
With these words, O sister, he suddenly departed, nor gave
himself to my sight, though my heart yearned to him, though I
kept eagerly stretching my hands to the blue vault of heaven,
weeping, and calling on him with loving tones. With pain and
weary heart at last sleep left me."']
[Footnote 55: Aen. ii. 270.]
[Footnote 56: 'Regret and sorrow fill their hearts, while
thus they say to one another, O Romulus, God-like Romulus, how
great a guardian of our country did the gods create in thee! O
father, author of our being, O blood sprung from the gods!
it is thou that hast brought us forth within the realms of
light.']
[Footnote 57: E.g. passages such as the following:--
Quique altum Praeneste viri, quique arva Gabinae
Junonis gelidumque Anienem et roscida rivis
Hernica saxa colunt, quos dives Anagnia pascit,
Quos, Amasene pater.--Aen. vii. 682-5.]
[Footnote 58: 'O father! O fatherland! O house of Priam,
palace, closing on high-sounding hinge, I have seen thee,
guarded by a barbaric host, with carved and deep-fretted roof,
with ivory and gold royally adorned.']
[Footnote 59: 'But they rise superior in spirit, and spurn the
first sharp wounds of war.']
[Footnote 60: 'When I begat them, I knew that they must die,
and to that end I bred them. Besides, when I sent them to Troy
to fight for Greece, I was well aware that I was sending them,
not to a feast, but to a deadly war.']
[Footnote 61: 'Such is my nature. Enmity and friendship
equally I bear stamped on my forehead.']
[Footnote 62: 'Ennio delector, ait quispiam, quod non discedit
a communi ordine verborum.'--Orator, 11.]
[Footnote 63: Cicero, Brutus, 15; Aulus Gellius, xii. 2.]
[Footnote 64: 'He was called by those, his fellow-countrymen,
who flourished then and enjoyed their day, the chosen flower
of the people, and the marrow of persuasion.']
[Footnote 65: Compare his account of the Tribune in the
Istrian war:--
'Undique conveniunt velut imber, tela tribuno,' etc.]
[Footnote 66: Cf. 'Unus homo nobis cunctando restituit rem,'
etc.]
[Footnote 67: Cf.
'Ita sapere opino esse optimum, ut pro viribus
Tacere ac fabulare tute noveris;'
also
'Ea libertas est quae pectus purum et firmum gestitat.']
[Footnote 68: 'Egregie cordatus homo catus Aeliu' Sextus.']
[Footnote 69: 'In idleness the mind knows not what it wants.
This is now our case. We are neither now at home nor
abroad. We go hither, back again to the place from which we
came,--when we have reached it we desire to leave it again.
Our mind is all astray--existence goes on outside of real
life.']
[Footnote 70: iii. 1059-67.]
[Footnote 71: 'But your superstitious prophets and impudent
fortune-tellers, idle fellows, or madmen, or the victims of
want, who cannot discern the path for themselves, yet point
the way out to others, and ask a drachma from the very persons
to whom they promise a fortune.']
[Footnote 72: 'And there it is announced to Julianus that
a certain public reader, an accomplished man, with a very
well-trained and musical voice, read the Annals of Ennius
publicly in the theatre. Let us go, says he, to hear this
"Ennianista," whoever he is,--for by that name he chose to be
called.'--Aulus Gellius, xviii. 5.
The following line of Martial (v. 10. 7) implies also his
popularity under the Empire--
'Ennius est lectus, salvo tibi, Roma, Marone.']
[Footnote 73: 'Let us venerate Ennius like the groves, sacred
from their antiquity, in which the great and ancient
oak-trees are invested not so much with beauty as with sacred
associations.'--Inst. Or. x. i. 88.]
[Footnote 74: 'Ennius, the wise and strong, and the second
Homer, as his critics will have it, seems to care little for
the issue of all his promises and Pythagorean dreams.'--Epist.
II. i. 50-2.]