A Short History of the Society Of Friends in Loudoun County

Delivered Before the Loudoun County Historical Society, November 16,

1962

By Asa Moore Janney

The members of the Religious Society of Friends were the last of the

three elements which make up our county to arrive. With the coming of

the Friends, the Germans were pretty well settled in that part of the

county north and northwest of Waterford, and the slave holders were to

the southeast of the Catoctin Hills and in the southwestern part of the

county.

Loudoun's Friends were introduced to the county, no doubt, by the

settlement of Friends along the Opekon Creek in what was then Orange

County, now Frederick, before the year 1732. In 1734, when George

Washington was two years old, these Friends from Pennsylvania and Elk

River in Maryland, applied for and were granted from East Nottingham

Meeting in Cecil County, Maryland, a meeting for worship which they

called Hopewell. The next year this was enlarged to a monthly meeting

for business and discipline under what came to be called Concord

Quarterly Meeting, composed of East Nottingham and Chester Quarterly

Meeting held at Concord, Chester County, Pennsylvania, and attached to

Philadelphia Meeting. At nearly the same time a Meeting at Monocacy,

Maryland, just across the Blue Ridge due east of Hagerstown, Maryland,

in Prince George County, was included in Hopewell Meeting. Without a

doubt it was this proximity of Hopewell Meeting to Loudoun County which

prompted Friends from the same meetings in Pennsylvania and Maryland who

established Hopewell to set up their meetings in Loudoun.

The good word that there were fine lands in Prince William County got

around, for in February of 1730 Samuel Marksberry ran a survey for his

grant "on Kittockton Mountain near the Thoroughfare or Hunting Path thru

said Mountain." This place we now call Clarks Gap. Lower down the

Catoctin Creek the Irishman, Asa Moore, had in 1732, according to

tradition, built a home on the South Branch of Catoctin and called it

after his native Waterford. While Moore probably had neighbors, unknown

to us to-day, it was not long before Amos Janney in 1733 left his home

at the Falls of the Delaware in Bucks County, Pennsylvania, and settled

in the Waterford community along with several Janneys, Thomas John,

Edward Morton, Samuel Harris, Thomas Bourne and others.

Since John Mercer, land speculator, and Catesby Cocke, clerk of Prince

William County and later of Fairfax, had already been granted the land

around Waterford, these early Friends must have leased or bought from

them, for we find in the Fairfax County, records that David Potts in

1746 leased 866 acres of land on "Kittockton Run from Catesby Cocke for

(5) five Shillings, paid in Hand, with the right to Purchase and an

annual Rental of one Ear of Indian Corn."

According to the _Register of Pennsylvania_, edited by Samuel Hazard, in

Vol. VII, printed in 1831--About the year 1733, Amos Janney from Bucks

County, and soon after divers other Friends, settled about 40 miles

lower in Virginia than the Opeckon, who obtained leave to hold a meeting

for worship on first days, which was held at the said Amos Janney's and

other Friends houses till the year 1741 when a piece of land was

purchased, and a meeting-house built thereon called Fairfax, whose

meetings have since been held twice a week.

Janney's _History of Friends_ notes in a memorial concerning his wife

Mary Janney, "he (Amos) is mentioned as a valuable Friend and true

helper Zion ward; and she is described as a devoted Christian, whose

meekness, gentleness, and kindness rendered her company truly agreeable

and instructive.

"When they came to Virginia, the neighborhood where they settled was

almost uninhabited, but other Friends soon coming after and settling

near them, a meeting for worship was held in their house."

At first, in 1733, Amos Janney was authorized to hold an "Indulged

Meeting" by East Nottingham Monthly Meeting; then the Waterford Meeting

was organized in 1735 as a Preparative Meeting, under the auspices of

Hopewell Meeting. Soon its membership increased and when the first

meeting house was built, probably of logs in 1741, the meeting applied

to Hopewell to be allowed to proceed as a monthly meeting. The

application was allowed, and in 1744 Fairfax Monthly Meeting was set up

along with Monocacy Preparative Meeting, just two years after Fairfax

County came into being. At the first Monthly Meeting six couples

requested permission to marry. Jane Hogue was clerk of Women's Meeting

with Elizabeth Norton and Mary Janney as overseers; Samuel Harris and

Jacob Janney were overseers and Amos Janney clerk of the Men's Meeting.

Monocacy Meeting was laid down in 1762; there is more of its history

following this date, but since it is out of our scope, we will leave it

where it lies.

Meanwhile the yeast of settlement was working, and about ten years from

the coming of the first settlers to Waterford we find them bringing in

their friends from up North and East. People were coming from Bucks and

Chester Counties in Pennsylvania, from New Jersey, Calvert County,

Maryland, and direct from England and Wales. Pressing out at the

southwest they found unclaimed land, some which, even that indefatigable

amasser of Loudoun County land, George Slater, had missed; rich and

valuable, between the North and Beaverdam Forks of Goose Creek. Here

they established themselves in settlements called Harmony, now Hamilton,

and Goose Creek, now Lincoln.

It is interesting to see how the land was granted to these later

settlers; for instance, the three earliest grants in the Harmony, Goose

Creek, Philomont, so called "Quaker Settlement" area were as follows:

William Diggs, of Diggs Valley (of which Clarence Case's farm was a

part) acquired 1,074 acres on August 27, 1731, William Bowell, 602 acres

on August 27, 1731, and George Atwood, 1,092 acres on September 24,

1737. Diggs and Bowell obtained their grants the last year Robert (King)

Carter acted as agent for Fairfax, as Carter died in 1732, and Fairfax

was having no more of the high handed manner in which Carter had handled

the business; so, the office was closed until Lord Fairfax came over

himself and issued a few grants in 1737, when the above George Atwood

must have gotten his. The office was not again opened until William

Fairfax, acting as agent for Fairfax, was ready for business in 1739,

when the Quakers stepped in and got theirs.

Around 1745, or sooner, Jacob Janney, his wife Hannah and others came

down from Bucks County and settled in the Goose Creek neighborhood. In

going over the certificates of removals granted persons leaving the

northern meetings and repairing to Virginia and comparing these

certificates with the dates of their grants, we see that several, but

not all, had been down to Virginia, taken a grant, and gone home for

wife and family, for instance: On third month 2nd, 1741, Joseph

Hollingsworth and wife obtained a certificate from Newark or Kennet

Meeting; his grant is dated April 20th, 1742.

In the minutes of the Falls Meeting: "Abel Janney was reported at the

Pertomock" on 10th Mo. 1st, 1742; his grant was dated March 17th, 1741.

George Gregg had a certificate on 5th Mo. 4th, 1740 from Newark and a

grant of June 3rd, 1744. (Wonder where he was the four years).

Isaac Nichols, a certificate on 9th Mo., 1743, for wife and Herman Cox

from Kennet and a grant for 560 acres on March 25th, 1743.

Jacob Janney received a certificate from the Falls Meeting of 8th Mo.,

the 5th, 1743, and a grant of 690 acres on June 20th, 1743. Jacob

married in 1742, if he came to Virginia in 1745 as historians claim,

where was he from the date of his grant in 1744 and the date of his

certificate, 1743?

Some of the grants were quite large: Ames Janney--2,345 acres, John Mead

1,289 acres, Gidney Clark 3,000 acres. Four Janney families got 4,843

acres, and more too, which was possible as Amos was a surveyor for

Fairfax and knew where all the "waste and ungranted lands" were.

Hannah Janney, the wife of Jacob, must have been a very strong character

as shown by a memorial in the minutes of Goose Creek Meeting of 1818,

the year of her death at the age of 93. It is stated that soon after

their establishment in their new home she went regularly twice a week to

a log in the forest where she set up an altar to her God by spending

some time in silent devotion.

As early as 1746 Fairfax Quarter granted to Friends settled on the banks

or tributaries of Goose Creek, which also included South Fork, at Union

(now Unison), the priviledge of holding a meeting for worship on the

third day of each month at the residence of the members. About 1750, or

51, a regular meeting was established at Goose Creek. The first meeting

house was built of logs and was said to have been built on the site

where Hannah held her devotions.

A traveling minister wrote in his autobiography: "On seventh day we went

to their monthly meeting at Fairfax, 8 miles from Leesburg, which was

large and solemn--On second day was at Goose Creek, 8 miles ye Meeting

house small yet did not hold half ye pepal which was a great

disc-advantage yet came away pretty Ese."

That the French and Indian War did not overly affect Loudoun County is

well known. However, the people well knew the hardship endured by the

Friends in the Valley, as this bit from the "Autobiography of William

Reckitt," who was a visitor in our county in 1757 shows. "Crossing

Potomac we came into Virginia to Fairfax; where we had a meeting on the

second day of the week and 12th of the 12th month. It was a good

meeting, truth having the dominion--We lodged at Mary Janney's, a

discrete orderly woman, who had several sober, well inclined children.

From hence we went to Goose Creek and had a meeting on third day; it was

well. On 4th day we had a meeting at David Pole's several Friends

accompanying us. I had a travail in spirit--We left David Pole's house

on 5th day and rode over the Blue Ridge or Blue Mountains, where the

Indians had done much mishief, by burning houses, killing, destroying,

and carrying many people away as captives; but Friends had not hitherto

been hurt: yet several had left their plantations and fled back again

over the Blue Mountains, where the lands had been rightly purchased of

the Indians."

Daniel Staunton in "Life, Travels and Gospel" reports that in December

of 1760, "We went forward crossing the Patowmac into Virginia: the next

Meetings were Fairfax, Goose Creek, Potts', or the Gap, some of which

were largely favored with solid comfort and satisfaction, there

appearing many dear Friends with whom I had unity in Spirit: from the

last place we traveled till we got over Shanandore river, and lodged at

John Vestal's."

The Potts' or Gap Meeting to which Staunton alludes, was held at

Hillsboro and was a meeting held under Fairfax. It was a constant source

of disputation and trouble to its Monthly Meeting, delegations often

being sent to try to straighten things out with the Potts and Janneys of

that section, but to no avail; for instance, Fairfax minutes report in

1761--"As Friends of Goose Creek and Friends of the Gap have not

attended business meetings--this meeting appoints Mary Janney, Rachel

Hollingsworth and Sara Janney to visit (them) to excite them to more

diligence." In 1765 "--if any disorder appear this meeting appoints

David Potts to supervise." Still in 1765 "--this meeting takes no note

of the great deficiencies of the Gap Friends in several particulars--"

Meetings were held in the home of David Williams until finally the Gap

Meeting came through with a meeting house, as this minute from Goose

Creek testifies: "Friends of the Gap reporting that they have built a

house for the conveniency of holding their meetings in, and got it now

nearly ready, this meeting concurs with their proposal in 1770 of

holding it therein accordingly." The land was two acres conveyed by

Mahlon Hough to Stephen Gray, Isaac Nichols, Jr., Thomas Smith and

William Hough, "to permit Such People Called Quakers to erect a Meeting

House, Schools, Yard and Place of Burial." In 1804 it is noted that the

Gap Meeting is small and in 1805 it is laid down. Sic transit mundi.

South Fork Meeting was another meeting which did not long survive,

despite the observation of the traveling minister John Comly in 1829

that it was strong and healthy. Yardley Taylor states that the meeting

was active in 1853. A later minister reported that all they thought

about was cock fighting and horse raceing. South Fork's "worldiness"

caused "concern" for its members "drank to excess," "fought, gambled",

"took to horse raceing," and "were lax morally." This meeting was laid

down shortly after the Civil War, and the administration of its

graveyard on a small budget has been a head ache to Goose Creek Meeting

ever since.

In 1757, while the Goose Creek Meeting was bursting out of its log

meeting house, the county of Loudoun was formed from Fairfax. The

trustees acted quickly. "On the 31st day of August, in the year of our

Lord one thousand seven hundred and fifty-seven, between William Hatcher

of the County of Loudoun and Colony of Virginia, planter of one part,

and Issac Nichols, Jacob Janney and Thomas Clows, of the said county,

planters of the other part, for five shillings sterling, together with

all trees, woods, underwoods, ways, paths, waters, watercourse,

easments, profits, commodities, advantages, emoluments, hereditaments,

rights, members and appurtentences whatsoever to the same

belonging"--were handed over to the said Nichols, Janney and Close for

one year in consideration of "one pepper corn in and upon the feast of

St. Michael the Archangel if demanded."

The object of this, one of the first deeds in the Clerk's office of

Loudoun County, was to conform to the Statute of Uses and Possession,

for on the very next day, September 21st, 1757, William Hatcher sold to

Isaac Nichols, Jacob Janney and Thomas Clows for thirty shillings the

very property he had rented them the day before, "to said grantees. In

TRUST to suffer and permit such of the people called Quakers--inhabiting

said County, to erect and build so many Meeting Houses, School-Houses,

Yards or Places of Burial--as they see fit--for the worship of God, the

instruction of youth and burial of the dead." One day had evidently been

enough to show that the property was in use by the Religious Society of

Friends.

As new settlers and babies arrived in the neighborhood the log meeting

house was found too small to accommodate the members, and the stone

meeting house across the road, according to the best information, was

erected between 1765 and 70. A minute of Fairfax Monthly held on ye 24th

of ye 9th month, 1774 reads: "This meeting received a copy of a minute

of our Quarterly Meeting dated the 15th of last month, granting the

request of Goose Creek Friends, a preparative meeting. This meeting is

willing to assist them as far as capable, and appoints Mahlon Janney,

Jonathan Myers, John Schooley, Moses Cadwalader, and William Williams to

go and sit with them at their first preparative meeting."

Friends in the Quarterly Meeting of which Fairfax was one part were most

cautious in extending monthly meeting status to Goose Creek, possibly

from unfortunate experiences elsewhere. We find from the minutes of

Warrington and Fairfax Quarterly Meeting the following report of a

committee appointed to judge of the expedience of settling a Monthly

Meeting at Goose Creek. "Most of our members have visited the

preparative meetings consituting Fairfax Monthly Meeting likewise

attended the service of that meeting and have since met together and

agree to report that we feel most easy to encourage the division

proposed--and a Monthly Meeting being settled at Goose Creek. Submitted

to the Quarterly Meeting by Isaac Everett, William Ballenger, James

Steer, William Kersey, Harman Updegraft, Alan Farquhar, Elisha Kirk,

Nathaniel, Jonah Hollingsworth, Ruth Holland, Rachel Hollingsworth, Mary

Updegraft.--It is agreed that a Monthly Meeting be settled there

accordingly."

The first monthly meeting was held 12th month 26th, 1785 and William

Kenworthy was selected clerk. In the first minutes we read the

following: "Joel Lewis and Sara Daniel handed their intentions of

marriage before the Meeting." "Moses Cadwalader and Isaac Nichols are

appointed to inquire into Joel's clearness of other engagements, also to

make inquiry into his conversation and what else may be needful."

About the beginning of the 19th century the membership became too large

to be comfortably accommodated in what came to be called "the old Stone

Meeting House." It was not until 1812, with a war going on, that the

question of the most practical way of obtaining more room was brought

before the meeting. The committee appointed to undertake the building of

what came to be "the large new Meeting House," was Jonas Janney, Isaiah

Brown, Israel Janney, Isaac Nichols, Samuel Nichols, Stephen Wilson,

Thomas Treham, Jesse Janney, George Walter, Joseph Bradfield and Mahlon

Taylor. These gentlemen saw the meeting turn down a proposal to add a

log addition to the stone building and finally on 2nd month, 27th, 1817,

it was decided to build an entirely new house with Mahlon Taylor,

Stephen Wilson and William Kenworthy as the building committee.

Kenworthy was most likely treasurer of the committee as his name is

signed to all the documents connected with the building operations.

William Kenworthy took in the subscriptions, which ranged all the way

from ten dollars to three hundred dollars, with the final total

collected being $3,606.00. Daniel Cockrell was to do the job, furnishing

all the foundings, for the sum of $3,550.00. In the final report of the

committee we find:--"the house being about completed, and in a good

measure answerable to the contract, we have paid him the whole of the

amount. We also examined his account of expenditures, by which it

appears he will suffer considerable loss, by the contract, unless he be

allowed some further renumeration." They stated that it would be

difficult to ascertain the exact loss but thought the meeting should pay

Cockrell an additional $500.00. A committee was formed which raised the

additional amount and paid the same to Cockrell.

On 1st month 27, 1819, Jonathan Taylor, a frequent visitor to Goose

Creek Friends Meeting, "Preached the first sermon in our large new

Meeting House."

Jesse Janney who was on the original building committee, never lived to

see it used. His foresight, however, solved one of the problems that

building a new meeting house created, as is shown by this minute in

April, 1819--"The committee continued in the first month last to propose

to this Meeting what particular purpose the donation of Jesse Janney,

Dec'd, shall be applied to reported that they had agreed to propose that

it be applied to enclosing a yard and erecting some necessary buildings

at the back of the New Meeting House. With which the Meeting concurred."

Jesse Hirst, Samuel Nichols, Daniel Janney, Jonas Janney, Mahlon Taylor,

William Piggott and Joshua Gore were appointed, "to consider what use

the Old Meeting House would be most advantageously applied to, and the

probable expense." The William Piggott named above "Were the rich Billy

Piggott what had glass windows in his barn."

By an old record these reasons are given for establishing a meeting: "Ye

objects of Religious assn. are to strengthen ye bonds of love, to

encourage to good works, to support ye weak, to comfort ye mourners, to

watch over one another for good and to reclaim those who have gone

astray."

A few quotes from the minutes of the meetings and a short review of

Friends accomplishments in Loudoun may let us see how well they attained

"Ye objects of Religious Assn." The meetings were frank and firm with

their members, for when Goose Creek was "informed that Jonathan

Bradfield had joined with light company in dancing," a committee pleaded

with him several times to reform his ways and at last upon his not

giving satisfaction he was reluctantly dropped from the rolls.

A more unfortunate event is recorded in the business meeting of the 28th

of 1st month, 1819: "A testimony was produced against S-- N-- which was

read, approved, and signed being as follows and handed to the Women's

Meeting. S-- N-- who has a right of membership in the Society of Friends

thru in attention to the dictates of Truth in her own Breast hath so far

deviated as to be guilty of fornication for which reproachful conduct we

deny her any longer a right of membership until she be enabled & make

suitable satisfaction for her offence, which is our desire for her."

Fairfax and Goose Creek records are a mine of genealogical data. Henry

B. Taylor in response to the request from a lady out west once sent her

what the minutes had to say about her Quaker ancestors. Several had been

"kicked out of meeting or been delt with" for drunkness, fighting and

adultery. She received his letter and some time later wrote again to

Henry, "that she was glad to state that her family had done better since

they had joined the Methodists."

The Meetings took care of their own, for often entries like the

following are found in the minutes: "Samuel Nichols, Seir. produced his

account of articles furnished for the support of Martha Scott." Social

security was unknown in those days. At Fairfax we find that a committee

was appointed to divide the estate of Richard Brown, deceased; to raise

a fund to settle the estate of a member who died poor and in debt; to

look after the widows and orphans; to see that members paid their debts;

to attend to a member "for encouraging the visits of a man not of our

Society in Courtship of his daughter"; to reprove a man "for taking off

his hat at a courtsmartial to gain favor with the officer in charge."

Friends in Loudoun owned slaves in the early years and for the first

quarter of a century the Fairfax minutes mention only that "Blacks in

the home should be well treated," and "African children" should be given

a useful education. In 1790 a committee was appointed "to care for freed

slaves." Later there was considerable opposition against slavery in the

meetings, several Friends were disowned for owning slaves. In 1836 a

committee "treated" with William Stone for hiring a slave, and in 1856

Mary Jane Hough was disowned for doing the same, though her husband

escaped a like fate by saying he was sorry and wouldn't do it again. It

was not until 1818 that the last ownership of slaves by Friends ceased

in Virginia. The story is told that John Woolman talked long and

earnestly with William Nichols that he free his slaves but when William

died in 1804 there were slaves mentioned in the inventory of his estate.

My grandfather, Francis Hogue Janney, was disowned for hiring a slave

and marrying out of meeting.

A manumission society was organized in the Oak Dale schoolhouse in 1824

for the purpose of sending slaves to Haiti and Africa, though we have no

information of any being sent.

It is my understanding that the small colored settlements at Rock Hill

and Guinea Bridge were made on land (rocky and poor, it is true) sold

cheaply to free negroes by Friends that they might build a home of their

own and not be sold back into slavery.

The first county map published in what was once Prince William County

was that of Loudoun by the Quaker Yardley Taylor. This work of enduring

value was published in 1853 and up to its time was the finest in

Virginia. Yardley was a nurseryman and the beautiful spruce trees around

Lincoln are his still living legacy to the beauty of Loudoun.

Yardley Taylor was engaged in the underground railroad trade. He was

castigated for it in at least one newspaper article in the fifties

written in the peculiar vehemence of the time. Samuel M. Janney never

said he helped a slave along physically but he was brought before the

county court for publishing that "the owners had no right of property in

their Slaves." His Statement to the court, "That the more you keep this

subject before the people the more they will be to my way of thinking,"

had the desired effect and the indictment was squashed.

It was in 1803 that Thomas Jefferson writing to a friend said, "The

county of Loudoun had been so exhausted and wasted by bad husbandry,

that it began to depopulate, the inhabitants going southwardly in search

of better lands--it is now become one of the most productive counties of

the State of Virginia and the price given for the lands is multiplied

manifold." This was the result of the LOUDOUN SYSTEM of agriculture we

have heard so much about. When Alexander Binns (no Quaker) published his

little "A Treatise on Practical Farming" in 1803, the County found out

what the Friends knew all along: that ground should lie in grass and

clover in rotation with the corn and wheat then grown, and what's more,

that lime was a must to get the most out of the grass and clover. Israel

Janney on a trip to Chester County, Pennsylvania, had brought down some

crushed limestone in his saddlebags and tried it out on some oats. The

oats flourished and so did the clover which Israel grew and sold to his

neighbors a quart at a time to try to get them started on this grand

forage plant. Binns tried all kinds of lime and plaster, he even bought

a ton of Israel Janey's lime and some of his clover seed, but the real

service he did was to experiment and publish his results.

The peace testimony of Friends was constantly appearing in the minutes.

Members were "spoken to" for attendance at muster; were "delt with" for

purchasing substitutes and paying the muster tax. At first the

Revolutionary War affected the Fairfax Meeting but little, however,

before it was over some fifteen members had been disowned for joining

the army. George Washington summed up the general attitude towards the

Quakers then in his famous, "Leave the Friends alone for you cannot

induce them to swear or fight for or against us. They are harmless,

peaceful and industrious people who will produce bread and meat, and if

they will not sell it to us, we will take it, if we need it; we need

bread and meat as much as we need soldiers."

During the Civil War soldiers of both sides were quartered in the

Waterford Meeting House. When meeting was going on they stepped outside

and some even came to meeting and as one writer said, "When they (the

Southern soldiers) first came to Waterford they seemed to entertain a

strong animosity against Friends--but becoming better acquainted, some

of the soldiers acknowledged (that) Friends delt with them more fairly

than any they had met on their march from the South, and their

prejudices were removed." It did seem strange to Friends to hold

meetings with swords hanging along the walls. A very original account of

captivity during _The War_ is given by William Williams. He and Robert

J. Hollingsworth were imprisoned in Richmond for two Southerners

likewise treated by the Federals. After much travel and hard work on the

part of wife Mary and Friends the two were released, though not before

suffering many real hardships.

Young Quaker men, being sympathetic with the Union, went North in great

numbers during _The War_, many to Ohio; they obtained jobs and found a

living away from Loudoun County and never came back to stay. It was this

exodus which began the decline of the meeting at Waterford. Many Friends

during the hostilities wished to travel to Baltimore in order to go to

Yearly Meeting. To do so they had to run the blockade along the Potomac.

Many ignored the guards at the river crossings, but many a one was

turned back. Samuel M. Janney was questioned by General (Shanks) Evans

after he was arrested for crossing the river during the early part of

the war.

General Evans--"Don't you know that your first duty is to your

country."

The Bulletin of the Loudoun County Historical Society, Volume IV, 1965 · 第 16 / 23 题