CHAPTER XI.

SECONDARY ROCKS.

_No. 5. The Chalk._

THE CRETACEOUS SYSTEM.

“His hands formed the dry land.”—DAVID.

At the conclusion of the Wealden period, the crust of our globe

underwent another great change. The fresh-water rocks we have just been

studying were probably submerged by some violent subterranean or

subaquean agency, and upon a great part of them a new deposit was

gradually formed. Foot by foot, and inch by inch, slowly accumulated

those cretaceous particles (Lat. _creta_, chalk) which now constitute

the chalk hills and cliffs of our own country, to say nothing of the

extent of territory in Europe occupied by this well-known mineral. To

those who like ourselves live in a chalk district, this formation

possesses special interest, simply because the “bounds of our

habitation” are fixed there; and though we miss here all traces of the

Ichthyosaurus and Iguanodon, although no Deinotherium nor Mastodon as

yet make their appearance on the stage of being, yet with a very little

knowledge of geology, coupled with a desire not to walk through the

world with “eyes and no eyes,” it is in our power to invest many an

otherwise motiveless walk with pleasurable interest. A cutting in the

hills may reveal some unthought-of geological curiosity; a heap of

flints may disclose some “rich and rare” fossils; and even a walk over

the Downs, those breezy “downs” or “heaths” of southern England, covered

with their short herbage, and dotted with their browsing sheep—those

downs that undulate in such well-known forms of beauty, may be fruitful

of suggestions concerning their origin, character and antiquity, that

may be of healthful power in the development of an intellectual life.

We live—that is, _we_ aforesaid—not on a fresh-water deposit, like the

people of Purbeck, Hastings, and so on, but upon an _old marine

deposit_. The huge cliffs of chalk that gave the name of _Albion_, the

“white isle,” to our country, with all these downs, which rest upon

chalk, having a depth or thickness of often more than two thousand feet,

were once formed at the bottom of pre-Adamite oceans; and in process of

time, as the secondary period drew near to its destined close, and other

and higher types of life were to make their appearance, were upheaved by

Him, “whose hands thus formed the dry land,” to serve the future

purposes and contribute to the comforts of the coming lord of all.

Of this Albion we may well be proud, as the home of religion, the

birth-place of true freedom, and the sanctuary of the oppressed. With

Coleridge we exclaim:—

“Not yet enslaved, nor wholly vile,

O Albion, O my mother isle!

Thy valleys fair, as Eden’s bowers,

Glitter green with sunny showers;

Thy grassy upland’s gentle swells

Echo to the bleat of flocks;

Those grassy hills, those glittering dells,

Proudly ramparted with rocks;

And Ocean, ’mid his uproar wild,

Speaks safety to his island-child.

Hence for many a fearless age

Has social quiet loved thy shore;

Nor ever proud invader’s rage

Or sack’d thy towers or stain’d thy fields with gore.”

If we were to tell the story of the Chalk formation, it would run

something after this fashion:—Once upon a time—but what time we don’t

know, for man’s records only go back a few thousand years; but long,

long ages before there was a man to till the earth—all this chalk lay

out of sight at the deep bottom of the old, old sea. The tall cliffs at

Dover, which Shakspeare would hardly recognise now with their tunnels

and railroads, the wavy downs of Sussex and Surrey, the chalk hills of

Hampshire, all that piece of Wiltshire called Salisbury Plain, and this

line of country stretching away north to bluff Flamborough Head, and

running down south to Weymouth and the isle of Purbeck, taking up in its

course a good part of Buckinghamshire, Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, and

Norfolk,—all this immense district, averaging probably a thousand feet

in thickness, lay quietly at the bottom of the sea. Yes! it wasn’t

created just pat in a moment, and set up in these hills and valleys, any

more than sand was created sand, but gradually, grain by grain, it

accumulated, ages rolling by while thus the earth was a-preparing. These

undulating downs knew then no boys pursuing on them their healthful and

gymnastic games; no fair riders then crossed these pleasant turfy

swards, inhaling life and vigour from the air of heaven; no evening

promenades for men of business, recreating the overworked physical

nature,—then diversified the scene: but instead thereof crumbling

particles of older rocks covered the floor of the ocean with their dust,

so making green sand, while the waste and débris of coral reefs, ground

up and pulverized, poured in their lavish contributions, so making

chalk; (?) while above this deposit thus forming, the ocean waves rolled

to and fro, and in their rise and fall, their daily ebb and flow,

sounded their eternal bass in the ear of old father Time, who certainly

then had no human children. Had we been there we should have seen as

tenants of the “vasty deep,” pectens, plagiostamas, hamites, belemnites,

and other odd-looking crustaceans, roaming about at their own sweet

will; some ganoid fishes that have now such hard names, that to write

them would interfere with the strain of this description; while here and

there we might have spied a veteran remnant of the oolite come down by

strange chance into the chalk, a solitary pterodactyle, snapped at and

pounced upon by an ugly mososaurus, a sea crocodile standing four feet

high. These, and such as these, were the tenants of that ocean, which

then rolled over our heaths and downs; and when at length their period

of life and purpose of creation were answered, these too all perished,

and the secondary formation ended its wondrous career. The old ocean

still rolls on, unchanged, unaltered still; but what changes has it seen

in these long distant epochs of which geology tries to tell the story!

“Time writes no wrinkle on thine azure brow;

Such as creation’s dawn beheld, thou rollest now!”

No one can write the history of the Chalk formation, without remembering

his indebtedness to the patient and laborious toil of Dr. Mantell in

this department, from whose “Geological Excursions round the Isle of

Wight,”[104] we give the following extract. “The features of a chalk

district are so well known, that a brief notice will render local

details unnecessary. The rounded summits of the hills, covered with

short verdant turf—the smooth undulated outline of the downs unbroken,

save by the sepulchral mounds of the early inhabitants of the

country—the coombes and furrows ramifying and extending into the deep

valleys, which abruptly terminate at the base of the hills, and appear

like dried-up channels of rivulets and streams, though free from all

traces of alluvial débris, thus bearing the impress of physical

operations, of which the agents that produced them have long since

passed away—are phenomena familiar to every one who has travelled over

the downs of the south-east of England, and are displayed in the chalk

districts of the ‘beautiful isle.’ These features are restricted to the

hilly districts of the _white chalk_, and have resulted from the

peculiar nature of the sedimentary detritus,[105] of which the strata

comprised in the upper division of the Cretaceous system are composed:

for in the lower groups, clays, marls, sands, and sandstones prevail;

and where these deposits approach the surface, and form the subsoil, the

country is broken and diversified, and the landscape presents a striking

contrast with the down scenery, as may be observed in the picturesque

district which flanks the escarpment of the chalk hills. It may,

perhaps, be necessary to remind the unscientific reader, that these

strata are but an insulated portion of an ancient sea-bottom, or in

other words, a mass of consolidated sediments formed in the profound

depths of the ocean, in a very remote period of the earth’s physical

history. This detritus is made up of inorganic and organic materials.

The former consist of the débris of the cliffs and shores which

encompassed the ancient sea, of the spoils of islands and continents

brought down into the ocean by fresh-water currents, and of chemical

deposits thrown down from mineral solutions. The organic substances are

the durable remains of animals and plants which lived and died in the

ocean, and of fluviatile and terrestrial species that were transported

from the land by rivers and their tributaries; the whole forming such an

assemblage of sedimentary deposits as would probably be presented to

observation, if a _mass of the bed of the Atlantic ocean_, 2,000 feet in

thickness, were elevated above the waters, and became dry land.”

We have alluded to the undulating character of the downs, so “well

known,” as Mantell says, that “local details are unnecessary.” How

correct this is may be seen in the following drawing, which represents a

portion of Royston Heath.

[Illustration: Fossil]

All over this heath is found the “Royston crow,” during the winter

months. This fine bird migrates hither from Norway, to avoid its severe

winters, and is scientifically known as the “Hooded-crow, _corvus

cornix_.” On its first arrival, when it is in its best plumage, it is

comparatively tame, allowing the sportsman to approach very near; but as

the season advances, acquaintance with the gun makes it very knowing and

shy. It associates freely with the other crows, but its nest has never

yet been found in England. About March the hooded-crow wholly

disappears. The head, throat, and wings are black; the back and breast a

“clear smoke-grey.” Norman, the bird-stuffer of this town, has always

several fine specimens on hand.

As, in the case of the Carboniferous system, we ventured to say to the

reader that it was not all _coal_, so in the Cretaceous system, we would

remind him that it is not all _chalk_; but without going minutely into

the subdivisions which the chalk formation has received, because this

unpretending elementary treatise does not profess to _teach_ geology,

but simply aims, as we have ventured again and again to repeat, to

infuse into the mind a desire of acquaintance with the marvels and

truths of this science, we will just indicate the leading divisions and

nomenclature of this deposit. First, there is the green sand; that is,

_first_, beginning at the bottom or lower part of the formation: this

may be well seen and studied in the neighbourhood of Cambridge, where we

have procured many of its characteristic fossils, including several

vertebræ and teeth of the otodus, a fish allied to the shark family,

such as are figured in the opposite diagram.

[Illustration:

FOSSIL TEETH OF FISHES:

FROM UPPER GREEN SAND, CAMBRIDGE.

1. OTODUS.

2. CARCHARIAS.

3. CORAX.

4. OXYRHINA.

5. NOTIDANUS.

6. LAMNA.

7. PTYCHODUS.

]

[Illustration:

FOSSILS FROM THE GAULT, FOLKSTONE.

1. AMMONITE DENTATUS.

2. AM. LAUTUS.

3. AM. SPLENDENS.

4. AM. CRISTATUS.

5. AM. DENARIUS.

6. CATILLUS SULCATUS.

]

At Potton and Gamlingay in Bedfordshire, and in the neighbourhood, this

green sand is highly ferruginous, and the roads and fields present that

peculiarly dark-red colour which is first singular and then wearisome to

the eye. In the case of the Potton beds, the red colour is caused by

oxidization or rust of iron; in the neighbourhood of Cambridge, &c.,

where there is the _green_ sand, this is owing to the influence of

“chloritous silicate of iron.” Then we have the galt or gault, a local

term of which we cannot trace the etymology. The gault, however, is not

of great thickness, but is likely to be the most interesting department

of the Chalk to the beginner, on account of the abundance and peculiar

appearance of its fossils. A ramble under the cliffs at Folkstone,[106]

where the gault may be seen in perfection, will amply repay any one for

toil, dirt, and a few slips and bruises. He will there find evidences of

a prolific and prodigal bestowment of life in the innumerable fragments

of organic remains every where observable; and if he be patient,—if he

won’t go running on from spot to spot, saying, as some do, “Oh, there’s

nothing here;” if he will just persevere in a minute examination of

every spot where organic remains may be detected, he will not come away

without his reward in ammonites, hamites, and other cephalopodous

mollusks, and most of them with that peculiar nacreous or

mother-of-pearl lustre upon them which renders the fossils of this

period so beautiful and attractive. Only we caution the explorer not to

buy of the so-called guides. At Dover and Folkstone the rogues have a

knack of getting a lump of gault, and sticking into it one or two common

pyrites, which are very abundant in the cliff, bits of shell, ammonites,

&c.; they then offer this conglomerate for sale, all rounded and smooth,

assuring you upon their “sacred honour,” the honour of men who always

draw upon their imagination for their facts, that they would not ask so

much for it, only on account of its excessive rarity. As good economists

always avoid cheap houses, and go to the best shops, so let the young

geologist always go to the best shop: let him go to the cliff with his

hammer, and work for himself. We picture a few fossils from the gault,

only regretting that it is out of the power of our artist to convey

their lustrous colours, as well as their curious forms.

[Illustration:

1. NATICA CANICULATA.

2.} VENTICRULITES.

3.}

4.} ROSTELLARIA MARGINATA.

5.}

6.}

7.} CATILLUS CRISPI.

8.}

]

[Illustration: Fossil]

Then comes, lastly, the _Chalk_: that is, the _white_ chalk, divided

into lower and upper; the _lower_ being harder and mostly without

flints, and the upper characterised by layers and bands of flint,

sometimes nodular, as in Cambridgeshire, and sometimes flat almost as a

pancake, as in the neighbourhood of Woolwich.

Above are some of the most characteristic fossils of the Chalk. No. 1 is

a _pecten_, or oyster, called the “five-ribbed,” or _quinque costatus_;

No. 2 is the _plagiostoma spinosa_, so called on account of its spines,

a shell found frequently in our chalk or lime-pits; No. 3 is the

intermediate hamite (Lat. _hamus_, a hook), “_hamites intermedius_;” No.

4 is the _spatangus cor-anguinum_, a very common fossil _echinus_ in the

chalk; No. 5 is the _ananchytes ovata_, found frequently in the Brighton

and Ramsgate cliffs; No. 6 is a scaphite (Gr. _skaphē_, a skiff or

boat); and the last is our old friend the belemnite, who has survived so

many of this earth’s changes, and now finds himself a contemporary of

the cretaceous inhabitants of the globe.

In many respects, the Chalk presents us with remarkable anomalies: we

have _sand_, the green sand, but unlike in colour and in texture the

sand of the old and new red sandstone, where we find it compressed and

hardened into solid and compact masses of stone; we have _clay_,

argillaceous beds such as the gault, but it is not clay hard and pressed

into slaty rocks, but soft and compressible; and we have _carbonate of

lime_, the chalk constituting the calcareous beds of this formation; but

where we have met with it before it has been hard and solid limestone,

and marble, not pliable and soft as in the Cretaceous system; and yet

apparently it is all the same material as we have found in the earlier

stages of the earth’s crust—the washings, degradations, and deludations

of older and harder rocks, along with the secretions and remains of

organized animals that once peopled this ancient earth; thus affording

us, on a large scale, another illustration of the economy observable in

all the works of God.

[Illustration:

FOSSIL FISH FROM LEWES.

]

Having spoken of the fossil fishes of the Chalk, we here give drawings

of two procured from the neighbourhood of Lewes, the famous fossil

fishing-ground of the late Dr. Mantell; and it is due to the name and

memory of the Chalk historian and geologist, to inform the reader that

Dr. M. was the first who succeeded, by skilful removal of the

surrounding chalk, in procuring a perfect ichthyolite from the

cretaceous formation of England. The British Museum is now enriched by

Dr. Mantell’s collection of fossil fishes, that once so much excited the

admiration of Agassiz, when he saw them at Brighton.

[Illustration:

FOSSIL FISH (ICHTHYOLITE) FROM LEWES.

]

Here let us again advert to the Deluge theory, not because our own minds

are not satisfied on the point, but because theology and science alike

demand a true statement of the facts of the case. We believe, as we said

in a previous chapter, in the plenary inspiration of nature, just as we

believe that the Scriptures were given by inspiration of God; and we are

quite sure that both books, if they are not misinterpreted, will declare

the glory of God in one common speech, and elevate the mind of man, to

whom they speak, up to a more adoring trust and a profounder reverence.

With Dr. Hitchcock we say, “It seems to me that the child can easily

understand the geological interpretation of the Bible and its reasons.

Why, then, should it not be taught to children, that they may not be

liable to distrust the whole Bible, when they come to the study of

geology? I rejoice, however, that the fears and prejudices of the pious

and the learned are so fast yielding to evidence; and I anticipate the

period, when on this subject the child will learn _the same thing in the

Sabbath school and in the literary institution_. Nay, I anticipate the

time as not distant when the high antiquity of the globe will be

regarded as no more opposed to the Bible, than the earth’s revolution

round the sun, and on its axis. Soon shall the horizon, where geology

and revelation meet, be cleared of every cloud, and present only an

unbroken and magnificent circle of truth.”[107] But to return; this

Deluge theory refers all existing fossils to “Noah’s flood,”—to that

violent diluvial action, the graphic account of which is in the book of

Genesis. Now, it is impossible to believe this if we look at a fossil:

look, for instance, at this terebratula, and observe how perfectly

uninjured it is, frail as is its shelly covering; or at this plagiostoma

spinosa, and mark how susceptible it is of injury, and yet that its

brittle spines are all unbroken; or at this inoceramus or catillus, and

observe its delicate flutings, still in exquisite preservation, without

fracture or distortion; or these specimens of echinites, the ananchytes

ovata, or the spatanguscor-anguinum, and see the markings on the shell,

the apertures of the mouth and stomach still perfect; who can see all

this and not come to the conclusion, that these creatures, and thousands

such as these, endured not only no violence in death, such as a deluge

would suppose, but that at death they subsided quietly to the bottom of

the sea, there to find a fitting sepulchre of soft cretaceous matter

prepared for them, which in process of time was lifted up, to exhibit in

a hard chalky bed their forms of pristine beauty?

In the upper chalk every one has seen the layers of flint, and marked

their singular distribution, in layers; and here we would add, that the

existence of flint in chalk is one of those hard nuts which geology has

not yet cracked. The geologist, the chemist, and the zoologist have all

puzzled themselves in vain to find a truly satisfactory origin for these

nodules of siliceous matter. We have heard it suggested that they may be

_coprolites_; but no one who examines the texture of a flint, can hold

that theory, to say nothing of the idea that the coprolites have been

preserved, while the animal remains have perished. We may sum up all we

have to say about flints in the following words, from that useful little

book, Chambers’s “Rudiments of Geology:”

“_The formation of flint_, within a mass so different in composition as

chalk, is still in some respects an unsolved problem in geology. It

occurs in nodular masses of very irregular forms and variable magnitude;

some of these not exceeding an inch, others more than a yard in

circumference. Although thickly distributed in horizontal layers, they

are never in contact with each other, each nodule being completely

enveloped by the chalk. Externally, they are composed of a white cherty

crust; internally, they are of a grey or black silex, and often contain

cavities lined with chalcedony and crystallized quartz. When taken from

the quarry they are brittle and full of moisture, but soon dry, and

assume their well-known hard and refractory qualities. Flints, almost

without exception, enclose remains of sponges, alcyonia, echinida, and

other marine organisms, the structures of which are often preserved in

the most delicate and beautiful manner. In some specimens the organism

has undergone decomposition, and the space it occupied either left

hollow, or partially filled with some sparry incrustation. From these

facts, it would seem that flints are as much an aggregation of silex

around some organized nucleus, as septaria are aggregations of clay and

carbonate of iron. This is now the generally received opinion; and when

it is remembered that the organisms must have been deposited when the

chalk was in a pulpy state, there can be little difficulty in conceiving

how the silex dissolved through the mass would, by chemical affinity,

attach itself to the decaying organism. Chalk is composed of carbonate

of lime, with traces of clay, silex, and oxide of iron; flint, on the

other hand, consists of 98 per cent. of pure silex, with a trace of

alumine, oxide of iron, and lime. Silex is quite capable of solution: it

occurs in the hot-springs of Iceland and most thermal waters; has been

found in a pulpy state within basalt; forms the _tabasheer_ found in the

cavities of the bamboo, and the thin pellicle or outer covering of

canes, reeds, grasses, &c.; and siliceous concretions are common in the

fruits and trees of the tropics. All these facts point to a very general

diffusion of silex in a state of solution; and whatever may have caused

its abundance in the waters during the deposition of the upper chalk,

there can be little doubt respecting the mode in which it has been

collected around the organic remains of these early seas.”

At Scratchell’s Bay in the Isle of Wight, it will be seen that the

flints are in a vertical position; and to the most casual observer the

perpendicular arrangement of these flints will supply the strongest

evidence of disturbance by upheaval from below. The bay in front, called

Scratchell’s Bay, is a small but romantic indentation in the coast of

the south side of the island, in which are the famous Needles. In the

face of the cliff is a noble archway between 200 and 300 feet high,

which has been created by the constant action of water eating and

wearing away the lower beds; while the Needles themselves are only

isolated masses of chalk, separated or eroded from the main land by the

same erosive action. “To the late Sir Henry Inglefield belongs the merit

of having first observed and directed attention to the highly

interesting phenomena of vertical chalk strata, occasioned by the

disruption and elevation of the eocene and cretaceous formations, which

are so remarkably displayed in the Isle of Wight, where the vertical

position of the strata, and the shattered condition of the flint

nodules, thought still embedded in the solid chalk, may be conveniently

studied in the cliffs in the neighbourhood of Scratchell’s Bay.”[108]

With the study of the Chalk formation, we close what has been

appropriately termed the “secondary period, or middle epoch of the

ancient world;” of which it has been well said, “In reviewing the

characters of the Cretaceous group, we have evidence that these varied

strata are the mineralized bed of an extensive ocean, which abounded in

the usual forms of marine organic life, as algæ, sponges, corals,

shells, crustacea, fishes, and reptiles. These forms are specifically

distinct from those which are discovered in the tertiary strata; in many

instances, the genus, in all the species, became extinct with the close

of the Cretaceous period. It affords a striking illustration of creative

power, that of the hundreds of species which composed the Fauna and the

Flora of the Cretaceous group, not one species passed into the

succeeding epoch.”[109]

Of that old ocean with its countless tenants we have already spoken, and

conclude by applying to it the well-known lines of Montgomery, in his

celebration of the coral insect in his “Pelican Island:”—

Millions of millions here, from age to age,

With simplest skill, and toil unweariable,

No moment and no movement unimproved,

Laid line on line, on terrace, terrace spread,

To swell the heightening, brightening gradual mound,

By marvellous structure climbing towards the day.

Omnipotence wrought in them, with them, by them;

Hence what Omnipotence alone could do,

Worms did.

[Illustration:

WALTONIAN AND MANTELLIAN FISHERMEN.

]

Geological facts; or, the crust of the earth, what it is, and what are its uses · 第 11 / 13 章