THE BURNING QUESTION IN EDUCATION.

If our left hand had been mangled, and continued to be an inflamed,

ulcerating mass, though carried in a sling and treated by all the

surgeons of repute around us,--never through a long life giving any

promise of restoration or even relief,--would not its restoration be

the most prominent question in our minds?

Society has a crushed, ulcerous, and painful hand upon which the

doctors of the college and church have expended such skill as they

have in their occasional perfunctory visits, and the hand grows no

better, but rather worse, during the whole existence of the American

Republic.

The existence of an increasing mass of crime, pauperism, and insanity

is the crushed and diseased hand of civilized society, to which and to

its obvious, natural method of healing I have vainly endeavored, in

the "New Education," to call the attention of our clergy and our

teachers. It is true that three editions of that book have been

disposed of to the delight of progressive thinkers, but it has made

little impression on those who control public institutions and public

opinion. Why is this?

There are sounds in nature too finely delicate to be heard by the

average ear, and rays beyond the violet too fine for the average human

eye, though visible to those of superior nervous endowments. So in the

world of thought there are ethical conceptions too high and pure for

the multitude,--conceptions so far away from their habitual life that

they cannot appreciate or sympathize with them. Such conceptions

constitute the ethical system of education, which is competent to

banish crime, and to introduce a higher social condition, as has been

amply proved by its imperfect introduction in the Lancaster, Ohio, and

other reformatory schools.

Why is not this made the prominent theme in every religious society,

as prominent as temperance? True, intemperance supplies us the

majority of criminals, but when the criminal is prepared in the

hot-bed of alcohol, society transplants him into a richer soil,

impregnated with a greater amount of filth than the saloon, and

cultivates him into the full-blown, hardened villain, for whom there

is nothing but a career of crime, very costly indeed to society.

Why is this insane course pursued? Because society has not the

Christianity which it professes, and the pulpit has not learned how to

instil the Divine law of love, while the college cares nothing about

it.

Society itself is _criminally indifferent_, and barbarously cruel. Its

only thought in reference to its debased members is not their lost

condition, and how to redeem them, but how to punish them revengefully

for their evil deeds, in imitation of the Divine Demon whom orthodox

theology recognizes as its model. Until society has enough of

benevolence or enough of practical sagacity to get rid of this common

impulse of brute life, we shall continue to have an energetic,

skilful, and formidable army of criminals, spread all over the land,

levying an immense tax upon respectable citizens, and requiring an

increasing army of police to restrain them.

The best discourse that has yet been preached in a Boston pulpit was

once delivered in Trinity Church by the assistant minister, Mr. Allen,

a few weeks since, which was made the basis of an admirable article on

"our prisoners" in the _Banner of Light_ of April 2. Mr. Allen treated

this subject in the spirit of the "New Education," showing that our

penal system, instead of reforming criminals, educates and perfects

them in crime, under which system crime is continually and alarmingly

increasing, the statistics which he gives being of the same terrible

character as those presented in the "New Education," showing that our

demoralization is progressing beyond that of any other country. His

statistics, which I have not examined in detail, show that there were

more than eight times as many prisoners in this country in 1880 as

there were in 1850. In Massachusetts, and especially in Boston, the

proportion of criminal population was still greater.

England, having adopted a reformatory system, has kept the criminal

population in check,--brought it down to one in 18,000, while we have

one to every 837, because our prisons are colleges of crime instead of

houses of reformation. A criminal population of 5,000 in Massachusetts

is kept under this debasing system, excepting about 700 in the

reformatory at Concord and the women's prison at Sherburne. Our

criminals are held for punishment amid evil influences, and turned out

only qualified to prey upon society again, since they have the brand

of shame upon them.

The only proper and wholesome view of this subject, the only view

compatible with ethical or religious principles, is that our

unfortunate criminal brethren need our loving care instead of

vindictive hate. They should never be sent to prison for any definite

term of confinement, as a punishment, but, like lunatics and pauper

patients, should be placed under care and control until they are

cured. Every criminal who will not obey the law in freedom should be

sent to prison for life, under a kind and humane system, there to earn

his own support and in some cases to repay the damage he has done, and

in all cases to remain there until he has, beyond all doubt, become so

thoroughly reformed that he may be safely entrusted with freedom. To

encourage in the work of reformation, he should be from time to time

rewarded by enlargement of his privileges and enjoyments, just in

proportion as he proves himself worthy; and after enjoying partial

freedom for years, with faithful and exemplary deportment, he should

be granted full liberty, on the sole condition of reporting himself at

certain regular periods, that a supervision may be retained over his

conduct, and confinement renewed if ever he should prove unworthy of

entire freedom.

This system has been tried with entire success, and travellers speak

of seeing prisoners in Ireland half emancipated, working in the

fields, whom they should not have distinguished from the common

laborers. That courageous philanthropist, the late Burnham Wardwell,

adopted a system of moral government in the Virginia penitentiary,

under which punishment was almost abolished; and he was able to send

out convicts in the city, under paroles, without any doubt that they

would faithfully return. Under a similar system at Lancaster, Ohio,

walls and locks were made unnecessary, and the youthful convicts went

out freely, when permitted to mingle with the neighboring youth. When

their reformation was completed, which did not require over three

years, they went forth to lead an honest life; and subsequent reports

showed that they walked in the path of respectability and honor.

The mother's love never abandons the idiot and criminal; but, alas!

society is neither mother nor father nor brother to its unfortunate

members, and hence society suffers, as we ever suffer from violation

of the Divine law.

Buchanan's Journal of Man, June 1887 Volume 1, Number 5 · 第 33 / 59 题