I must now tell you something about the distances of the stars. I
shall not make the attempt to explain fully how astronomers make such
measurements, but I will give you some notion of how it is done. You
may remember I showed you how we found the distance of a globe that
was hung from the ceiling. The principle of the method for finding the
distance of a star is somewhat similar, except that we make the two
observations not from the two ends of a table, not even from opposite
sides of the earth, but from two opposite points on the earth’s orbit,
which are therefore at a distance of 186,000,000 miles. Imagine that on
Midsummer Day, when standing on the earth here, I measure with a piece
of card the angle between the star and the sun. Six months later, on
Midwinter Day, when the earth is at the opposite point of its orbit,
I again measure the angle between the same star and the sun, and we
can now determine the star’s distance by making a triangle. I draw a
line a foot long, and we will take this foot to represent 186,000,000
miles, the distance between the two stations; then placing the cards
at the corners, I rule the two sides and complete the triangle, and the
star must be at the remaining corner; then I measure the sides of the
triangle, and find how many feet they contain, and recollecting that
each foot corresponds to 186,000,000 miles, we discover the distance of
the star. If the stars were comparatively near us, the process would be
a very simple one; but, unfortunately, the stars are so extremely far
off that this triangle, even with a base of only one foot, must have
its sides many miles long. Indeed, astronomers will tell you that there
is no more delicate or troublesome work in the whole of their science
than that of discovering the distance of a star.
In all such measurements we take the distance from the earth to the
sun as a conveniently long measuring-rod, whereby to express the
results. The nearest stars are still hundreds of thousands of times
as far off as the sun. Let us ponder for a little on the vastness of
these distances. We shall first express them in miles. Taking the sun’s
distance to be 93,000,000 miles, then the distance of the nearest fixed
star is about twenty millions of millions of miles--that is to say,
we express this by putting down a 2 first, and then writing thirteen
ciphers after it. It is, no doubt, easy to speak of such figures, but
it is a very different matter when we endeavor to imagine the awful
magnitude which such a number indicates. I must try to give some
illustrations which will enable you to form a notion of it. At first I
was going to ask you to try and count this number, but when I found it
would require at least 300,000 years, counting day and night without
stopping, before the task was over, it became necessary to adopt some
other method.
When on a visit in Lancashire I was once kindly permitted to visit a
cotton mill, and I learned that the cotton yarn there produced in a
single day would be long enough to wind round this earth twenty-seven
times at the equator. It appears that the total production of cotton
yarn each day in all the mills together would be on the average about
155,000,000 miles. In fact, if they would only spin about one-fifth
more, we could assert that Great Britain produced enough cotton yarn
every day to stretch from the earth to the sun and back again! It is
not hard to find from these figures how long it would take for all the
mills in Lancashire to produce a piece of yarn long enough to reach
from our earth to the nearest of the stars. If the spinners worked
as hard as ever they could for a year, and if all the pieces were
then tied together, they would extend to only a small fraction of the
distance; nor if they worked for ten years, or for twenty years, would
the task be fully accomplished. Indeed, upwards of 400 years would be
necessary before enough cotton could be grown in America and spun in
this country to stretch over a distance so enormous. All the spinning
that has ever yet been done in the world has not formed a long enough
thread!
There is another way in which we can form some notion of the immensity
of these sidereal distances. You will recollect that, when we were
speaking of Jupiter’s moons (p. 219), I told you of the beautiful
discovery which their eclipses enabled astronomers to make. It was
thus found that light travels at the enormous speed of about 185,000
miles per second. It moves so quickly that within a single second a ray
would flash two hundred times from London to Edinburgh and back again.
We said that a meteor travels one hundred times as swiftly as a
rifle-bullet; but even this great speed seems almost nothing when
compared with the speed of light, which is 10,000 times as great.
Suppose some brilliant outbreak of light were to take place in a
distant star--an outbreak which would be of such intensity that the
flash from it would extend far and wide throughout the universe.
The light would start forth on its voyage with terrific speed. Any
neighboring star which was at a distance of less than 185,000 miles
would, of course, see the flash within a second after it had been
produced. More distant bodies would receive the intimation after
intervals of time proportional to their distances. Thus, if a body
were 1,000,000 miles away the light would reach it in from five to six
seconds, while over a distance as great as that which separates the
earth from the sun the news would be carried in about eight minutes. We
can calculate how long a time must elapse ere the light shall travel
over a distance so great as that between the star and our earth. You
will find that from the nearest of the stars the time required for the
journey will be over three years. Ponder on all that this involves.
That outbreak in the star might be great enough to be visible here,
but we could never become aware of it till three years after it had
happened. When we are looking at such a star to-night we do not see it
as it is at present, for the light that is at this moment entering
our eyes has travelled so far that it has been three years on the way.
Therefore, when we look at the star now we see it as it was three years
previously. In fact, if the star were to go out altogether, we might
still continue to see it twinkling for a period of three years longer,
because a certain amount of light was on its way to us at the moment
of extinction, and so long as that light keeps arriving here, so long
shall we see the star showing as brightly as ever. When, therefore, you
look at the thousands of stars in the sky to-night, there is not one
that you see as it is now, but as it was years ago.
I have been speaking of the stars that are nearest to us, but there
are others much farther off. It is true we cannot find the distance
of these more remote objects with any degree of accuracy, but we
can convince ourselves how great that distance is by the following
reasoning. Look at one of the brightest stars. Try to conceive that the
object was carried away further into the depths of space, until it was
ten times as far from us as it is at present, it would still remain
bright enough to be recognized in quite a small telescope; even if it
were taken to one hundred times its original distance it would not have
withdrawn from the view of a good telescope; while if it retreated
one thousand times as far as it was at first it would still be a
recognizable point in our mightiest instruments. Among the stars which
we can see with our telescopes, we feel confident there must be many
from which the light has expended hundreds of years, or even thousands
of years, on the journey. When, therefore, we look at such objects, we
see them, not as they are now, but as they were ages ago; in fact, a
star might have ceased to exist for thousands of years, and still be
seen by us every night as a twinkling point in our great telescopes.
Remembering these facts, you will, I think, look at the heavens with a
new interest. There is a bright star, Vega or Alpha Lyræ, a beautiful
gem, so far off that the light from it which now reaches our eyes
started before many of my audience were born. Suppose that there are
astronomers residing on worlds amid the stars, and that they have
sufficiently powerful telescopes to view this globe, what do you think
they would observe? They will not see our earth as it is at present,
they will see it as it was years, and sometimes many years, ago. There
are stars from which, if England could now be seen, the whole of the
country would be observed at this present moment to be in a great
state of excitement at a very auspicious event. Distant astronomers
might notice a great procession in London, and they could watch the
coronation of a youthful queen amid the enthusiasm of a nation. There
are other stars still further, from which, if the inhabitants had good
enough telescopes, they would now see a mighty battle in progress not
far from Brussels. One splendid army could be beheld hurling itself
time after time against the immovable ranks of the other. They would
not, indeed, be able to hear the ever-memorable, “Up, Guards, and at
them!” but there can be no doubt that there are stars so far away that
the rays of light which started from the earth on the day of the
battle of Waterloo are only just arriving there. Further off still,
there are stars from which a bird’s-eye view could be taken at this
very moment of the signing of Magna Charta. There are even stars from
which England, if it could be seen at all, would now appear, not as the
great England we know, but as a country covered by dense forests, and
inhabited by painted savages, who waged incessant war with wild beasts
that roamed through the island. The geological problems that now puzzle
us would be quickly solved could we only go far enough into space and
had we only powerful enough telescopes. We should then be able to view
our earth through the successive epochs of past geological time; we
should be actually able to see those great animals whose fossil remains
are treasured in our museums tramping about over the earth’s surface,
splashing across its swamps, or swimming with broad flippers through
its oceans. Indeed, if we could view our own earth reflected from
mirrors in the stars, we might still see Moses crossing the Red Sea, or
Adam and Eve being expelled from Eden.
So important is the subject of star distance that I am tempted to give
one more illustration in order to bring before you some conception of
how vast such distances are. I shall take, as before, the nearest of
the stars so far as known to us, and I hope to be forgiven for taking
an illustration of a practical and a commercial kind instead of one
more purely scientific. I shall suppose that a railway is about to
be made from London to Alpha Centauri. The length of that railway,
of course, we have already stated: it is twenty billions of miles.
So I am now going to ask your attention to the simple question as to
the fare which it would be reasonable to charge for the journey. We
shall choose a very cheap scale on which to compute the price of a
ticket. The parliamentary rate here is, I believe, a penny for every
mile. We will make our interstellar railway fares much less even than
this; we shall arrange to travel at the rate of one hundred miles for
every penny. That, surely, is moderate enough. If the charges were so
low that the journey from London to Edinburgh only cost fourpence,
then even the most unreasonable passenger would be surely contented.
On these terms how much do you think the fare from London to this
star ought to be? I know of one way in which to make our answer
intelligible. There is a National Debt with which your fathers are,
unhappily, only too well acquainted; you will know quite enough about
it yourselves in those days when you have to pay income tax. This debt
is so vast that the interest upon it is about sixty thousand pounds
a day, the whole amount of the National Debt being six hundred and
thirty-eight millions of pounds (April, 1898).
If you went to the booking office with the whole of this mighty sum
in your pocket--but stop a moment; could you carry it in your pocket?
Certainly not, if it were in sovereigns. You would find that after you
had as many sovereigns as you could conveniently carry there would
still be some left--so many, indeed, that it would be necessary to get
a cart to help you on with the rest. When the cart had as great a load
of sovereigns as the horse could draw there would be still some more,
and you would have to get another cart; but ten carts, twenty carts,
fifty carts, would not be enough. You would want five thousand of these
before you would be able to move off towards the station with your
money. When you did get there and asked for a ticket at the rate of one
hundred miles for a penny, do you think you would get any change? No
doubt some little time would be required to count the money, but when
it was counted the clerk would tell you that there was not enough, that
he must have nearly two hundred millions of pounds more.
That will give some notion of the distance of the nearest star, and we
may multiply it by ten, by one hundred, and even by one thousand, and
still not attain to the distance of some of the more remote stars that
the telescope shows us.
On account of the immense distances of the stars we can only perceive
them to be mere points of light. We can never see a star to be a globe
with marks on it like the moon, or like one of the planets--in fact,
the better the telescope the smaller does the star seem, though,
of course, its brightness is increased with every addition to the
light-grasping power of the instrument.