CHAPTER VIII

EARLY EXPERIENCES IN JOURNALISM

Although Eugene Field made his first essay in journalism as a reporter,

there is not the shadow of a tradition that he made any more progress

along the line of news-gathering and descriptive writing than he did as

a student at Williams. He had too many grotesque fancies dancing

through his whimsical brain to make account or "copy" of the plain

ordinary facts that for the most part make up the sum of the news of

the average reporter's day. What he wrote for the St. Louis Journal or

Times-Journal, therefore, had little relation to the happening he was

sent out to report, but from the outset it possessed the quality that

attracted readers. The peculiarities and not the conventions of life

appealed to him and he devoted himself to them with an assiduity that

lasted while he lived. Thus when he was sent by the Journal to

Jefferson City to report the proceedings of the Missouri State

Legislature, what his paper got was not an edifying summary of that

unending grist of mostly irrelevant and immaterial legislation through

the General Assembly hopper, but a running fire of pungent comment on

the Idiosyncrasies of its officers and members. He would attach himself

to the legislators whose personal qualities afforded most profitable

ammunition for sport in print. He shunned the sessions of Senate and

House and held all night sessions of story and song with the choice

spirits to be found on the floors and in the lobbies of every western

legislature. I wonder why I wrote "western" when the species is as

ubiquitous in Maine as in Colorado? From such sources Field gleaned the

infinite fund of anecdote and of character-study which eventually made

him the most sought-for boon companion that ever crossed the lobby of

a legislature or of a state capital hotel in Missouri, Colorado, or

Illinois. He was a looker-on in the legislative halls, and right

merrily he lampooned everything he saw. Nothing was too trivial for

his notice, nothing so serious as to escape his ridicule or satire.

There was little about his work at this time that gave promise of

anything beyond the spicy facility of a quick-witted, light-hearted

western paragrapher. Looking back it is possible, however, to

discover something of the flavor of the inextinguishable drollery

that persisted to his last printed work in such verses as these in

the St. Louis Journal:

_THE NEW BABY

We welcome thee, eventful morn

Since to the poet there is born

A son and heir;

A fuzzy babe of rosy hue,

And staring eyes of misty blue

Sans teeth, sans hair.

Let those who know not wedded joy

Revile this most illustrious boy--

This genial child!

But let the brother poets raise

Their songs and chant their sweetest lays

To him reviled.

Then strike, O bards, your tuneful lyres,

'Awake, O rhyming souls, your fires,

And use no stint!

Bring forth the festive syrup cup--

Fill every loyal beaker up

With peppermint!

March, 1878._

In the spring of 1879 the St. Louis Times-Journal printed the following

April verses by Field, which were copied without the author's name by

London Truth, and went the rounds of the papers in this country,

credited to that misnamed paper, and attributed, much to Field's glee,

to William S. Gilbert, then at the height of his Pinafore and Bab

Ballad fame:

_APRIL VESPERS

The turtles drum in the pulseless bay,

The crickets creak in the prickful hedge,

The bull-frogs boom in the puddling sedge

And the whoopoe whoops its vesper lay

Away

In the twilight soft and gray.

Two lovers stroll in the glinting gloam--

His hand in her'n and her'n in his--

She blushes deep--he is talking biz--

They hug and hop as they listless roam--

They roam--

It's late when they get back home.

Down by the little wicket-gate,

Down where the creepful ivy grows,

Down where the sweet nasturtium blows,

A box-toed parent lies in wait--

In wait

For the maiden and her mate.

Let crickets creak and bull-frogs boom,

The whoopoe wail in the distant dell--

Their tuneful throbs will ne'er dispel

The planted pain and the rooted gloom--

The gloom

Of the lover's dismal doom._

Just by the way of illustrating in fac-simile and preserving the

character of the newspaper paragrapher's work in the last century, the

following "Funny Fancies," by Field, from the St. Louis Journal of

August 3d, 1878, may be of interest:

A green Christmas--No, no, we mean a green peach makes a fat

graveyard.

A philanthropic citizen of Memphis has wedded a Miss Hoss. He doubtless

took her for wheel or whoa.

We have tried every expedient and we find that the simple legend:

"Smallpox in this House" will preserve the most uninterrupted bliss in

an editorial room.

There is a moment when a man's soul revolts against the dispensations

of Providence, and that is when he finds that his wife has been using

his flannel trousers to wrap up the ice in.

To the average Athenian the dearest spot on earth is the Greece spot.

Mr. Deer was hung at Atlanta. Of course he died game.

'Tis pleasant at the close of day

To play

Croquet.

And if your partner makes a miss

Why kiss

The siss.

But if she gives your chin a thwack,

Why whack

Her back!

A great many newspaper men lie awake night after night mentally

debating whether they will leave their property to some charitable

institution or spend it the next day for something with a little lemon

in it.

It was during his earlier connection with the St. Louis Journal that

Field was assigned the duty of misreporting Carl Schurz, when that

peripatetic statesman stumped Missouri in 1874 as a candidate for

re-election to the United States Senate. Field in later years paid

unstinted tribute to the logic, eloquence, and patriotic force of Mr.

Schurz's futile appeals to the rural voters of Missouri. But during the

trip his reports were in nowise conducive to the success of the

Republican and Independent candidate. Mr. Schurz's only remonstrances

were, "Field, why will you lie so outrageously?" It was only by the

exercise of careful watchfulness that Mr. Schurz's party was saved from

serious compromise through the practical jokes and snares which Field

laid for the grave, but not revered Senator. On one occasion when a

party of German serenaders appeared at the hotel where the party was

stopping, before Mr. Schurz had completed a necessary change of toilet

Field stepped out on the veranda, and, waving the vociferous cornet and

trombone to silence, proceeded to address the crowd in broken English.

As he went on the cheering soon subsided into amazed silence at the

heterodox doctrines he uttered, until the bogus candidate was pushed

unceremoniously aside by the real one. Mr. Schurz had great difficulty

in saving Field from the just wrath of the crowd, which had resented

his broken English more than his political heresies.

On another occasion when there was a momentary delay on the part of the

gentleman who was to introduce Mr. Schurz, Field stepped to the front

and with a strong German accent addressed the gathering as follows:

LADIES AND SHENTLEMEN: I haf such a pad colt dot et vas not bossible

for me to make you a speedg to-night, but I haf die bleasure to

introduce to you my prilliant chournatistic friend Euchene Fielt, who

will spoke you in my blace.

It was all done so quickly and so seriously that the joke was complete

before Mr. Schurz could push himself into the centre of the stage.

Annoyance and mirth mingled in the explanations that followed. A love

of music common to both was the only thing that made Field tolerable to

his serious-minded elder.

Regarding Eugene Field's work upon the St. Jo Gazette, it was local in

character and of the most ephemeral nature. There is preserved in the

pocket-books of some old printers in the West the galley proof of a

doggerel rhyme read by him at the printers' banquet, at St. Joseph,

Mo., January 1st, 1876. It details the fate of a "Rat" printer, who,

in addition to the mortal offence of "spacing out agate" type with

brevier, sealed his doom by stepping on the tail of our old friend,

the French poodle McSweeny. The execution of the victim's sentence

was described as follows:

_His body in the fatal cannon then they force

Shouting erstwhile in accents madly hoarse,

"Death to all Rats"--the fatal match is struck,

The cannon pointed upwards--then kerchuck!

Fiz! Snap! Ker--boom! Slug 14's grotesque form

Sails out to ride a race upon the storm,

Up through the roof, and up into the sky--

As if he sought for "cases" up on high,

Till like a rocket, or like one who's trusted,

He fell again to earth--completely busted._

There is not much suggestion, or even promise, in this doggerel, of

the Eugene Field whose verses of occasion were destined within a dozen

years to be sought for in every newspaper office in America.

Long before Field learned the value of his time and writing, he began

to appreciate the value of printer's ink and showed much shrewdness in

courting its favor. He did not wait for chance to bring his wares into

notice, but early joined the circle of busy paragraphers who formed a

wider, if less distinguished, mutual admiration society than that

free-masonry of authorship which at one time almost limited literary

fame in the United States to Henry James, William Dean Howells, Charles

Dudley Warner, and Thomas Bailey Aldrich. Robert J. Burdette is about

the only survivor of the coterie of paragraphers, who, a quarter of a

century ago, made such papers as the Burlington Hawkeye, the Detroit

Free Press, the Oil City Derrick, the Danbury News, and the Cincinnati

Saturday Night, widely quoted throughout the Union for their clever

squibs and lively sallies. Field put himself in the way of the

reciprocating round of mutual quotation and spicy comment, and before

he left St. Louis his "Funny Fancies" in the Times-Journal had the

approval of his fellow-jesters if they could not save that paper from

its approaching doom.

Before leaving St. Louis, however, Eugene Field was to strike one of

the notes that was to vibrate so sweetly and surely to his touch unto

the end. He had lost one baby son in St. Jo, and Melvin was a mere

large-eyed infant when his father was moved at Christmas-time, 1878,

to write his "Christmas Treasures," which he frequently, though

incorrectly, declared to be "the first verse I ever wrote." He probably

meant by this that it was the first verse he ever wrote "that he cared

to preserve," those specimens I have introduced being only given as

marking the steps crude and faltering by which he attained a facility

and technique in the art of versification seldom surpassed.

In Mr. Field's "Auto-Analysis" will be found the following reference to

this early specimen of his verse:

I wrote and published my first bit of verse in 1879: It was entitled

"Christmas Treasures" [see "Little Book of Western Verse"]. Just ten

years later I began suddenly to write verse very frequently.

Which merely indicates what little track Field kept of how, when, or

where he wrote the verse that attracted popular attention and by which

he is best remembered. I need hardly say that with a few noteworthy

exceptions his most highly-prized poems were written before 1888, as a

reference to the "Little Book of Western Verse," above cited, and which

was published in 1889, will clearly show.

In the year 1880 Field received and accepted an offer of the managing

editorship of the Kansas City Times, a position which he filled with

singular ability and success, but which for a year put an almost

absolute extinguisher on his growth as a writer. Under his management

the Times became the most widely-quoted newspaper west of the

Mississippi. He made it the vehicle for every sort of quaint and

exaggerated story that the free and rollicking West could furnish or

invent. He was not particular whether the Times printed the first,

fullest, or most accurate news of the day so long as its pages were

racy with the liveliest accounts and comments on the daily comedy,

eccentricity, and pathos of life.

Right merrily did he abandon himself to the buoyant spirits of an

irrepressible nature. Never sparing himself in the duties of his

exacting position on the Times, neither did he spare himself in

extracting from life all the honey of comedy there was in it. His

salary did not begin to keep pace with his tastes and his pleasures.

But he faced debts with the calm superiority of a genius to whom the

world owed and was willing to pay a living.

There lived in Kansas City, when Field was at the height of his local

fame there, one George Gaston, whose café and bar was the resort of all

the choice spirits of the town. He fairly worshipped Field, who made

his place famous by entertainments there, and by frequent squibs in the

Times. Although George had a rule suspending credit when the checks

given in advance of pay day amounted to more than a customer's weekly

salary, he never thought of enforcing it in the case of 'Gene. More

than once some particularly fine story or flattering notice of the good

cheer at Gaston's sufficed to restore Field's credit on George's

spindle. At Christmas-time that credit was under a cloud of checks for

two bits (25 cents), four bits, and a dollar or more each to the total

of $135.50, when, touched by some simple piece that Field wrote in the

Times, Gaston presented his bill for the amount endorsed "paid in

full." When the document was handed to Field he scanned it for a moment

and then walked over to the bar, behind which George was standing

smiling complacently and eke benevolently.

"How's this, George?" said Field.

"Oh, that's all right," returned George.

"But this is receipted," continued the ex-debtor.

"Sure," said the gracious creditor.

"Do I understand," said Field, with a gravity that should have warned

his friend, "that I have paid this bill?"

"That's what," was George's laconic assurance.

"In full?"

"In full's what I said," murmured the unsuspecting philanthropist,

enjoying to the full his own magnanimity.

"Well, sir," said Field, raising his voice without relaxing a muscle,

"Is it not customary in Missouri when one gentleman pays another

gentleman in full to set up the wine?"

George could scarcely respire for a moment, but gradually recovered

sufficiently to mumble, "Gents, this is one on yours truly. What'll you

have?"

And with one voice Field's cronies, who were witnesses to the scene,

ejaculated, "Make it a case." And they made a night of it, such as

would have rejoiced the hearts of the joyous spirits of the "Noctes

Ambrosianæ."

From such revels and such fooling Field often went to work next day

without an hour's sleep.

While in Kansas City Field wrote that pathetic tale of misplaced

confidence that records the fate of "Johnny Jones and his sister Sue."

It was entitled "The Little Peach" and has had a vogue fully as wide,

if not as sentimental, as "Little Boy Blue." Field's own estimate of

this production is somewhat bluntly set out in the following note upon

a script copy of it made in 1887:

Originally printed in the Kansas City Times, recited publicly by Henry

E. Dixey, John A. Mackey, Sol Smith Russell, and almost every comedian

in America. Popular but rotten.

The last word is not only harsh but unjust. The variation of the

closing exclamation of each verse is as skilful as anything Field ever

did. Different, indeed, from the refrain in "Wynken, Blynken and Nod,"

but touching the chords of mirth with certainty and irresistible

effect. Field might have added, that none of the comedians he has named

ever gave to the experience of "Johnny Jones and His Sister Sue" in

public recitation the same melancholy humor and pathetic conclusion as

did the author of their misfortunes and untimely end himself. As a

penance, perhaps, for the injustice done to "The Little Peach" in the

quoted comment, Field spent several days in 1887 in translating it, so

to speak, into Greek characters, in which it appears in the volume

given to Mrs. Thompson, which is herewith reproduced in facsimile as a

specimen of one of the grotesque fancies Field indulged:

[Illustration: "THE PEAR" IN FIELD'S "GREEK" TEXT.]

For the benefit of those unfamiliar with the Greek characters, I have

retranslated this poem into corresponding English, which the reader can

compare with his version of "The Little Peach."

_THE PEAR

(In English Equivalent.)

A little pear in a garden grue

A little pear of emerald 'ue

Kissed bi the sun and bathed bi the due,

It grew.

One da, going that garden thro'

That little pear kame to the fue

Of Thomas Smith and 'is sister Sue

Those tou!

Up at the pear a klub tha thrue

Down from the stem on uikh it grue

Fell the little pear of emerald 'ue

Peek-a-boo!

Tom took a bite and Sue took one too

And then the trouble began to brue

Trouble the doktors kouldn't subdue

Too true (paragorik too?).

Under the turf fare the daisies grue

They planted Tom and 'is sister Sue

And their little souls to the angels flue

Boo 'oo!

But as to the pear of emerald 'ue

Kissed bi the sun and bathed bi the due

I'll add that its mission on earth is thro'

Adieu._

Eugene Field, a Study in Heredity and Contradictions — Volume 1 · 第 8 / 16 章