RACE AND NATIONALITY

The struggle that is now devastating Europe has been described as

an unavoidable war of races, as an outcome of the innate hostility

between Teutonic, Slav, and Latin peoples, that can never be overcome

by argument and reason, because it is due to deep-seated “racial

instinct.” If this were so, we might despair of the future of mankind;

for beyond this conflict would arise others without end, as wider and

closer international intercourse develops and brings more emphatically

into consciousness racial differences like those between Latin-American

and Anglo-American, East Indian and European, Mongol or Malay and

European. If this view were correct, the so-called “racial instinct”

would perpetuate wars of extermination until one race alone survived.

It is true that in our own political and social life the feeling of

racial solidarity finds strong expression in our behavior towards

Mongol and Negro. It is equally true that in Europe the Slavic world is

moved to its depths by the Pan-Slavistic idea; that Germany has been

carried far on a wave of admiration for the excellence of the great

Teutonic race, and that England rests serene on the unshaken conviction

of the superiority of the Anglo-Saxon; and yet the emotional value of

these ideas does not make clear their rational values.

The term “racial instinct” expresses the ideas that there are definite,

insurmountable antipathies based on differences of appearance, and

that certain hereditary mental characteristics belong to each type of

man.

In Europe, the occurrence of local types has led to the concept of

distinct races, identified with certain national groups: the blond

representing the Teuton; the heavy, darker type, the Slav; and the

Mediterranean, the typical Spaniard or Italian.

On account of the peculiar position of the blond type, it has been

pre-eminently identified with the so-called Aryan race. As is well

known, most of the languages of Europe are derived from one ancient

form of speech,--the parental Aryan language. Slavic, Teutonic, and

Romance languages are the most important modern divisions of this

group in Europe, to which Greek, Celtic, Lithuanian, and Albanian also

belong. Among European languages, only Finnish and its relatives on the

Baltic, Magyar, Turkish, and Basque, do not belong to this extended

group. Aryan languages are spoken by people of the most diverse racial

types; nevertheless there are scientists who try to identify the blond

north-European with the ancient pure Aryan, and who claim for the race

pre-eminent hereditary gifts, because the people who at present and in

our concept are the leaders of the world speak Aryan languages.

Scientific proof of these contentions cannot be given. They are rather

fancies of north-European dreamers, based on the complaisant love of

the achievements of the blondes. No one has ever proved either that all

the Aryans of the earliest times were blondes, or that people speaking

other languages may not have been blond, too; and nobody would be

able to show that the great achievements of mankind were due to blond

thinkers. On the contrary, the men to whom we are indebted for the

basic advance of civilization belong to the dark-complexioned human

types of the Orient, Greece, and Italy, and not to our blond ancestors.

How deep and emotional a hold this idea has in the minds of some

scientists appears when some investigators try to show us that Christ

cannot have been a Jew by descent, but must have been an Aryan.

Race and nationality · 第 6 / 12 题