CHAPTER VII.

INTERMITTENT FILTRATION.

By intermittent nitration is understood that filtration in which the

filtering material is systematically and adequately ventilated, and

where the water during the course of filtration is brought in contact

with air in the pores of the sand. In continuous filtration, which

alone has been previously considered, the air is driven out of the sand

as completely as possible before the commencement of filtration, and

the sand is kept continuously covered with water until the sand becomes

clogged and a draining, with an incidental aeration, is necessary to

allow the filter to be scraped and again put in service.

In intermittent filtration, on the other hand, water is taken over the

top of the drained sand and settles into it, coming in contact with

the air in the pores of the sand, and passes freely through to the

bottom when the water-level is kept well down. After a limited time the

application of water is stopped, and the filter is allowed to again

drain and become thoroughly aerated preparatory to receiving another

dose of water.

This system of treating water was suggested by the unequalled

purification of sewage effected by a similar treatment. It has been

investigated at the Lawrence Experiment Station, and applied to the

construction of a filter for the city of Lawrence, both of which are

due to the indefatigable energy of Hiram F. Mills, C.E.

In its operation intermittent differs from continuous filtration in

that the straining action is less perfect, because the filters yield

no water while being aerated, and must therefore filter at a greater

velocity when in use to yield the same quantity of water in a given

time, and also on account of the mechanical disturbance which is

almost invariably caused by the application of the water; but, on the

other hand, the oxidizing powers of the filter, or the tendency to

nitrify and destroy the organic matters, are stronger, and in addition,

if the rate is not too high, the bacteria die more rapidly in the

thoroughly aerated sand than is the case with ordinary filters.

It was found at Lawrence in connection with sewage filters that when

nitrification was actively taking place the numbers of bacteria were

much lower than under opposite conditions, and it was thought that

nitrification in itself might cause the death of the bacteria. Later

experiments, however, with pure cultures of bacteria of various kinds

applied to intermittent filters with water to which ammonia and salts

suitable for nitrification were added, showed that bacteria of all

the species tried were able to pass the filter in the presence of

nitrification, producing at least one thousand times as much nitrates

as could result in any case of water-filtration, as freely as was

the case when the ammonia was not added and there was but little

nitrification. These results showed conclusively that nitrification

in itself is not an important factor in bacterial removal, although

nitrification and bacterial purification do to some extent go together;

perhaps in part because the nitrification destroys the food of the

bacteria and so starves them out, but probably much more because the

conditions of aeration, temperature, etc., which favor nitrification

also favor equally, and even in its absence, the death of the bacteria.

The rate at which water must pass through an intermittent filter

is, on account of the intervals of rest, considerably greater than

that required to give a corresponding total yield from a continuous

filter, and its straining effect is reduced to an extent comparable to

this increase in rate; and if other conditions did not come in, the

bacterial efficiency of an intermittent filter would remain below that

of a continuous one.

As a matter of fact the bacterial efficiency has usually been found

to be less with intermittent filters at the Lawrence Experiment

Station, when they have been run at rates such as are commonly used for

continuous filters in Europe, say from one and one half to two million

gallons and upwards per acre daily. With lower rates, and especially

with rather fine materials, the bacterial efficiency is much greater;

but it may be doubted whether it would ever be greater than that of a

continuous filter with the same filtering material and the same total

yield per acre. The number of bacteria coming from the underdrains is

apparently generally less, and with very high summer temperatures much

less, than in continuous filters, and this often gives an apparent

bacterial superiority to the intermittent filters.

The effluents from intermittent often contain less slightly organic

matter than those from continuous filters; but, on the other hand,

hardly any water proposed for a public water-supply has organic matter

enough to be of any sanitary significance whatever, apart from the

living bodies which often accompany it; and if the latter are removed

by straining or otherwise, we can safely disregard the organic matters.

In addition, the water filtered will in a great majority of cases have

enough air dissolved in itself to produce whatever oxidation there is

time for in the few hours required for it to pass the filter, and it is

only at very low rates of filtration that intermittent filters produce

effluents of greater chemical purity than by the ordinary process. The

yellow-brown coloring matter present in so many waters appears to be

quite incapable of rapid nitrification; and where it is to some extent

removed by filtration, the action is dependent upon other and but

imperfectly understood causes which seem to act equally in continuous

and intermittent filters.

The peculiarities of construction involved by this method of filtration

will be best illustrated by a discussion of the Lawrence city filter

designed by Hiram F. Mills, C.E., which is the only filter in existence

upon this plan.[30]

THE LAWRENCE FILTER.

The filter consists of a single bed 2-1/2 acres in area, the bottom of

which is 7 feet below low water in the river, and filled with gravel

and sand to an average depth of 4-1/2 feet. The filter is all in a

single bed instead of being divided into the three or four sections

which would probably have been used for a continuous filter of this

size. The water-tight bottom also was dispensed with, and the gravel

was prevented from sinking into the silt by thin intermediate layers

of graded materials. The saving in cost was considerable; but, on the

other hand, a considerable quantity of ground-water comes up through

the bottom and increases the hardness of the water from 1.5 to 2.6

parts of calcium carbonate in 100,000; and while the water when

compared with many other waters is still extremely soft, the addition

cannot be regarded as desirable. The ground-water also contains iron,

which increases the color of the water above what it would otherwise be.

The underdrains have a frictional resistance ten times as great as

would be desirable for a continuous filter, the idea being to check

extreme rates of filtration in case of unequal flooding, and also to

limit the quantity of water which could be gotten through the filter to

that corresponding to a moderate rate of filtration.

The sand, instead of being all of the same-sized grain, is of two

grades, with effective sizes respectively 0.25 and 0.30 mm., the

coarser sand being placed farthest away from the underdrains, where

its greater distance is intended to balance its reduced frictional

resistance and make all parts filter at an equal rate.

The surface instead of being level is waved, that is, there are ridges

thirty feet apart, sloping evenly to the valleys one foot deep half

way between them, to allow water to be brought on rapidly without

disturbing the sand surface. For the same reason, as well as to secure

equality of distribution, a system of concrete carriers for the raw

water goes to all parts of the filter, reducing the effective filtering

area by 4 or 5 per cent. The filter is scraped as necessary in

sections, the work being performed when the filter is having its daily

rest and aeration. Owing to the difference in frictional resistance

before and after scraping, and to the fact that it is impossible to

scrape the entire area in one day, considerable variations in the rate

of filtration in different parts of the filter must occur. The heavy

frictional resistance of the underdrains when more than the proper

quantity of water passes them tends to correct this tendency especially

for the more remote parts of the filter, but perhaps at the expense of

those near to the main drain.

The filter is not covered as the suggestions in Chapter II would

require, but this is hardly on account of its being an intermittent

filter.

The annual report of the Massachusetts State Board of Health for 1893

states that during the first half of December, 1893, the surface

remained covered, that is, it was used continuously, and after December

16th it was so used when the temperature was below 24°, and was drained

only when the temperature was 24° or above. The days on which the

filter was drained during the remainder of December are not given, but

during January and February, 1894, the filter remained covered 29 days

and was drained 30 days. Bacterial samples were taken on 44 of these

days, 22 days when it was drained and 22 when it was not. The average

number of bacteria on the days when it was not drained was 137 and on

those days when it was drained 252 per cubic centimeter.

From February 24th to March 12th the number of bacteria were unusually

high, averaging 492 per cubic centimeter, or 5.28 per cent of the 9308

applied. During this period the filter was used intermittently; there

was ice upon it, and parts of the surface were scraped under the ice,

and high rates of filtration undoubtedly resulted on the scraped areas.

After March 12th the ice had disappeared and very much better results

were obtained.

While there may be some question as to the direct cause of this

decreased efficiency with continued cold weather and ice, the results

certainly are not such as to show the advisability of building open

filters in the Lawrence climate.

The cost of building the filter in comparison with European filters

was extraordinarily low—only $67,000, or $27,000 per acre of filter

surface. To have constructed open continuous filters of the same area

with water-tight bottoms, divided into sections with separate drains

and regulating apparatus, with the necessary piping, would have cost at

least half as much more, and with the masonry cover which I regard as

most desirable in the Lawrence climate the cost would have been two or

three times the expenditure actually required.

It was no easy matter to secure the consent of the city government to

the expenditure of even the sum used; there was much skepticism as to

the process of filtration in general, and it was said that mechanical

filters could be put in for about the same cost. Insisting upon the

more complete and expensive form might have resulted either in an

indefinite postponement of action, or in the adoption of an inferior

and entirely inadequate process. Still I feel strongly that in the

end the greater expense would have proved an excellent investment in

securing softer water and in the greater facility and security of

operating the filter in winter.

In regard to the effect of the Lawrence filter upon the health of

the city, I can best quote from Mr. Mills’ paper in the Report of

the Massachusetts State Board of Health for 1893, and also published

in the Journal of the New England Water-works Association. Mr. Mills

says: “In the following diagram [Fig. 15] the average number of deaths

from typhoid fever at Lawrence for each month from October to May, in

the preceding five years, are given by the heavy dotted line; and the

number during the past eight months are given by the heavy full line.

“The total number for eight months in past years has been forty-three,

and in the present year seventeen, making a saving of twenty-six. Of

the seventeen who died nine were operatives in the mills, each of whom

was known to have drunk unfiltered canal water, which is used in the

factories at the sinks for washing.

[Illustration: FIG. 15.—TYPHOID FEVER IN LAWRENCE.]

“The finer full line shows the number of those who died month after

month who are not known to have used the poisoned canal water. The

whole number in the eight months is eight.

“It is evident from the previous diagram [not reproduced] that the

numbers above the fine full line, here, follow after those at Lowell in

the usual time, and were undoubtedly caused by the sickness at Lowell;

but we have satisfactory reason to conclude that the disease was not

propagated through the filter but that the germs were conveyed directly

into the canals and to those who drank of the unfiltered canal water.

Among the operatives of one of the large corporations not using the

canal water there was not a case of typhoid fever during this period.

Warnings have been placed in the mills where canal water is used to

prevent the operatives from drinking it.

“We find, then, that the mortality from typhoid fever has, during the

use of the filter, been reduced to 40 per cent of the former mortality,

and that the cases forming nearly one half of this 40 per cent were

undoubtedly due to the continued use of unfiltered river water drawn

from the canals.”

The records of typhoid fever in Lawrence before and after the

introduction of filters are as follows:

DEATHS FROM TYPHOID FEVER IN LAWRENCE, 1888-98.

--------+----------+-------------+------------------------------------

| | | Persons who are known to have been

Years. | Total | Deaths | exposed to infection.

| Number | per +--------------+---------------------

| of | 10,000 | | While living out

| Deaths. | of | By drinking | of town just before

| | Population. | Canal Water. | falling sick in

| | | | Lawrence.

--------+----------+-------------+--------------+---------------------

1888 | 48 | 11.36 | |

1889 | 55 | 12.66 | |

1890 | 60 | 13.44 | |

1891 | 55 | 11.94 | |

1892 | 50 | 10.52 | |

1893 | 39 | 7.96 | |

1894 | 24 | 4.75 | 12 |

1895 | 16 | 3.07 | 9 | 2

1896 | 10 | 1.86 | 2 | 4

1897 | 9 | 1.62 | |

1898 | 8 | 1.39 | 1 |

--------+----------+-------------+--------------+---------------------

Filter put in operation September, 1893.

Average rate before the introduction of filtered water (1888-92) 11.31

Average rate afterward (1894-98) 2.54

These results show a striking reduction in the deaths from typhoid

fever with the introduction of filtered water, which has been most

gratifying in every way.

The more recent history of the underdrains of the Lawrence filter

is particularly instructive. Owing to the absence of a water-tight

bottom to the filter, and its low position, a certain amount of water

constantly entered the filter from the ground below. This water

contained iron in solution as ferrous carbonate. When this water came

in contact with the filtered water in the gravel and underdrains, the

iron was oxidized by the dissolved oxygen carried in the filtered water

and precipitated. This was accompanied by a growth of crenothrix in

the gravel and underdrains, which gradually reduced their carrying

capacity. This reduction in carrying capacity first became apparent

in cold weather when the yield from the filter was less free than

formerly. There was difficulty in maintaining the supply during the

winter of 1896-7 and more difficulty in the following winter.

[Illustration: FIG. 16.—TYPHOID FEVER IN LAWRENCE, 1888 TO 1898.]

The sand of the filter was as capable of filtering the full supply

of water as it ever had been, and the efficiency was as good; but

the underdrains were no longer able to collect the filtered water

and deliver it. As the filtering area was ample for the supply, it

was desired to avoid construction of additional filtering area. The

underdrains were dug up and cleaned during the periods when the filter

was drained. As the filter is all in one bed, the times when the filter

could be allowed to remain drained, and when the work could proceed,

were limited. Great care was taken to leave the work in good condition,

and free from passages, at the end of each day’s work, but the numbers

of bacteria in the effluent nevertheless increased somewhat. Some

weeks afterward the number of cases of typhoid fever in the city

increased. The numbers did not become as high as they had been prior to

the introduction of filtered water, but they were much higher than they

had been since that time, and they pointed strongly to the disturbance

of the underdrains as the cause of the increase.

The numbers of bacteria in the applied water and in the effluent from

the Lawrence filter by months, from the time the filter was put in

operation, compiled from the reports of the State Board of Health, as

far as available, are as follows:

BACTERIA IN WATER APPLIED TO AND EFFLUENT FROM LAWRENCE FILTER.

RAW WATER.

----------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------

| 1893. | 1894. | 1895. | 1896. | 1897. | 1898.

----------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------

January | | 7,700 | 18,700 | 7,500 | 13,314 | 6,519

February | | 7,600 | 15,040 | 12,600 | 13,113 | 4,653

March | | 6,500 | 20,770 | 5,900 | 12,055 | 3,748

April | | 11,200 | 8,420 | 3,800 | 6,904 | 2,320

| | | | | |

May | | 6,000 | 7,000 | 9,600 | 4,625 | 2,050

June | | 8,300 | 9,000 | 6,400 | 4,650 | 6,775

July | | 2,400 | 10,000 | 3,900 | 6,240 | 2,840

August | | 3,100 | 5,000 | 2,700 | 10,700 | 8,575

| | | | | |

September | 57,500 | 6,500 | 5,000 | 12,300 | 27,300 | 6,100

October | 22,200 | 25,300 | 19,000 | 5,300 | 13,200 | 5,120

November | 10,800 | 16,600 | 8,700 | 5,600 | 6,644 | 4,310

December | 8,100 | 23,800 | 6,700 | 9,695 | 5,581 | 5,200

+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------

Average | 24,650 | 10,417 | 11,111 | 7,108 | 10,360 | 4,850

EFFLUENT.

January | | 129 | 206 | 166 | 91 | 39

February | | 244 | 283 | 315 | 79 | 45

March | | 455 | 405 | 133 | 67 | 34

April | | 281 | 84 | 40 | 47 | 21

| | | | | |

May | | 134 | 68 | 56 | 35 | 48

June | | 110 | 68 | 22 | 56 | 50

July | | 25 | 50 | 39 | 106 | 22

August | | 36 | 38 | 146 | 72 | 28

| | | | | |

September | 6,850 | 42 | 40 | 37 | 98 | 67

October | 1,216 | 116 | 60 | 30 | 33 | 28

November | 161 | 175 | 64 | 37 | 27 | 122

December | 111 | 364 | 84 | 67 | 24 |

+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------

Average | 2,084 | 176 | 121 | 91 | 61 | 46

| | | | | |

Average | | | | | |

efficiency | 91.55 | 98.31 | 98.91 | 98.72 | 99.41 | 98.95

CHEMNITZ WATER-WORKS.

The only other place which I have found where anything approaching

intermittent filtration of water is systematically employed is

Chemnitz, Germany. The method there used bears the same relation to

intermittent filtration as does broad irrigation of sewage to the

corresponding method of sewage treatment; that is, the principles

involved are mainly the same, but a much larger filtering area is used,

and the processes take place at a lower rate and under less close

control.

[Illustration: FIG. 17.—PLAN OF AREA USED FOR INTERMITTENT FILTRATION

AT CHEMNITZ.]

The water-works were built about twenty years ago by placing

thirty-nine wells along the Zwönitz River, connected by siphon pipes,

with a pumping-station which forced the water to an elevated reservoir

near the city (Fig. 17). The wells are built of masonry, 5 or 6 feet in

diameter and 10 or 12 feet deep, and are on the rather low bank of the

river. The material, with the exception of the surface soil, and loam

about 3 feet deep, is a somewhat mixed gravel with an effective size of

probably from 0.25 to 0.50 mm., so that water is able to pass through

it freely. The wells are, on an average, about 120 feet apart, and the

line is seven eighths of a mile long.

It was found that in dry times the ground-water level in the entire

neighborhood was lowered some feet below the level of the river without

either furnishing water enough or stopping the flow of the river below.

The channel of the river was so silted that, notwithstanding the porous

material, the water could not penetrate it to go toward the wells.

A dam was now built across the river near the pumping-station, and

a canal was dug from above the dam, crossing the line of wells and

running parallel to it on the back side for about half a mile. Later a

similar canal was dug back of the remaining upper wells. Owing to the

difference in level in the river above and below, the canals can be

emptied and filled at pleasure. They are built with carefully prepared

sand bottoms, and the sand sides are protected by an open paving, to

allow the percolation of as much water as possible, and the sand is

cleaned by scraping, as is usual with ordinary sand filters, once a

year or oftener.

The yield from the wells was much increased by these canals, but the

water of the river is polluted to an extent which would ordinarily

quite prevent even the thought of its being used for water-supply, and

it was found that the water going into the ground from the canals,

and passing through the always saturated gravel to the wells, without

coming in contact with air at any point, after a time contained iron

and had an objectionable odor.

To avoid this disagreeable result the meadow below the pumping-station

was laid out as an irrigation field (Fig. 16). The water from above the

dam was taken by a canal on the opposite side of the river through a

sedimentation pond (which, however, is not now believed to be necessary

and is not always used), and then under the river by a siphon to a

slightly elevated point on the meadow, from which it is distributed

by a system of open ditches, exactly as in sewage irrigation. The

area irrigated is not exactly defined and varies somewhat from time

to time; the rate of filtration may be roughly estimated at from

100,000 to 150,000 gallons per acre daily, although limited portions

may occasionally get five times these quantities for a single day. The

water passes through the three feet of soil and loam, and afterward

through an average of six feet of drained coarse sand or gravel in

which it meets air, and afterward filters laterally through the

saturated gravel to the wells. The water so obtained is invariably of

good quality in every way, colorless, free from odor and from bacteria.

The surface of the irrigated land is covered with grass and has

fruit-trees (mostly apple) at intervals over its entire area.

This first system of irrigation is entirely by gravity. On account

of natural limits to the land it could not be conveniently extended

at this point, and to secure more area, the higher land above the

pumping-station was being made into an irrigation field in 1894. This

is too high to be flooded by gravity, and will be used only for short

periods in extremely dry weather. The water is elevated the few feet

necessary by a gas-engine on the river-bank. In times of wet weather

enough water is obtained from the wells without irrigation, and the

land is only irrigated when the ground-water level is too low.

During December, January, and February irrigation is usually impossible

on account of temperature, and the canals are then used, keeping them

filled with water so that freezing to the bottom is impossible; but

trouble with bad odors in the filtered water drawn from the wells is

experienced at these times.

The drainage area of the Zwönitz River is only about 44 square miles,

and upon it are a large number of villages and factories, so that the

water is excessively polluted. The water in the wells, however, whether

coming from natural sources, or from irrigation, or from the canals,

has never had as many as 100 bacteria per cubic centimeter, and is

regarded as entirely wholesome.

In extremely dry weather the river, even when it is all used for

irrigation so that hardly any flows away below, cannot be made to

supply the necessary daily quantity of 2,650,000 gallons, and to supply

the deficiency at such times, as well as to avoid the use of the canals

in winter, a storage reservoir holding 95,000,000 gallons has recently

been built on a feeder of the river. This water, which is from an

uninhabited drainage area, is filtered through ordinary continuous

filters and flows to the city by gravity. Owing to the small area of

the watershed it is incapable of supplying more than a fraction of the

water for the city, and will be used to supplement the older works.

This Chemnitz plant is of especial interest as showing the successful

utilization of a river-water so grossly polluted as to be incapable of

treatment by the ordinary methods. Results obtained at the Lawrence

Experiment Station have shown that sewage is incapable of being

purified by continuous filtration, the action of air being essential

for a satisfactory result. With ordinary waters only moderately

polluted this is not so; for they carry enough dissolved air to effect

their own purification. In Chemnitz, however, as shown by the results

with the canals, the pollution is so great that continuous filtration

is inadequate to purify the water, and the intermittent filtration

adopted is the only method likely to yield satisfactory results in such

cases.

Intermittent filtration is now being adopted for purifying brooks

draining certain villages and discharging into the ponds or reservoirs

from which Boston draws its water-supply. The water of Pegan Brook

below Natick has been so filtered since 1893 with most satisfactory

results, and affords almost absolute protection to Boston from any

infection which might otherwise enter the water from that town. A

similar treatment is soon to be given to a brook draining the city of

Marlborough. The sewage from these places is not discharged into the

brooks, but is otherwise provided for, but nevertheless they receive

many polluting matters from the houses and streets upon their banks.

The filtration used resembles in a measure that at Chemnitz, and I am

informed by the engineer, Mr. Desmond FitzGerald, that it was adopted

on account of its convenience for this particular problem, and not

because he attaches any special virtue to the intermittent feature.

APPLICATION OF INTERMITTENT FILTRATION.

In regard to the use of waters as grossly polluted as the Zwönitz,

the tendency is strongly to avoid their use, no matter how complete

the process of purification may be; but in case it should be deemed

necessary to use so impure a water for a public supply, intermittent

filtration is the only process known which would adequately purify

it. And it should be used at comparatively low rates of filtration.

I believe that an attempt to filter the Zwönitz at the rate used for

the Merrimac water at Lawrence, which is by comparison but slightly

polluted, would result disastrously.

The operation in winter must also be considered. Intermittent

filtration of sewage on open fields in Massachusetts winters is only

possible because of the comparatively high temperature of the sewage

(usually 40° to 50°), and would be a dismal failure with sewage at

the freezing-point, the temperature to be expected in river-waters in

winter.

It is impossible to draw a sharp line between those waters which are

so badly polluted as to require intermittent filtration for their

treatment and those which are susceptible to the ordinary continuous

filtration. Examples of river-waters polluted probably beyond the

limits reached in any American waters used for drinking purposes and

successfully filtered with continuous filters are furnished by Altona,

Breslau, and London.

Intermittent filtration may be considered in those cases where it

is proposed to use a water polluted entirely beyond the ordinary

limits, and for waters containing large quantities of decomposable

organic matters and microscopical organisms; but in those cases where

a certain and expeditious removal of mud is desired, and where

waters are only moderately polluted by sewage, but still in their raw

state are unhealthy, it is not apparent that intermittent filtration

has any advantages commensurate with the disadvantages of increased

rate to produce the same total yield and of the increased difficulty

of operation, particularly in winter; and in such cases continuous

filtration is to be preferred.

In the removal of tastes and odors from pond or reservoir waters which

are not muddy, but which are subject to the growths of low forms of

plants, which either by their growth or decomposition impart to the

water disagreeable tastes and odors, intermittent filtration may have a

distinct advantage. In such cases there is often an excess of organic

matter to be disposed of by oxidation, and the additional aeration

secured by intermittent filtration is of substantial assistance in

disposing of these matters.

The filtration of public water-supplies Third edition, revised and enlarged. · 第 7 / 16 章