Baillot, of whom I have still to speak, was not only a great violinist

by the readiest and most varied mechanism imaginable, but he was a

poet by his exquisite feeling for the beauties of music and his ready

conception of the style necessary for imparting the true character

of each composition. Pollani, pupil of Nardini, was one of Baillot’s

masters; but the immense natural talent of Baillot formed the rich

basis of his own fancy; a great solo performer, he never went to the

extent of his vast capabilities, if the work he was to interpret failed

to awaken his appreciation. At the Opera, where he was engaged to play

the solos for dancing, he was only the shadow of himself; but when at

annual meetings for the performance of quartetts and quintetts, with

the genius of Boccherini, of Haydn, of Mozart, and of Beethoven, his

enthusiasm was aroused; he became sublime and unequalled for his varied

accentuation, the various shadings of expression, and the poetry of his

ideas. His bow was magical; and every note under his fingers became an

eloquent inspiration. Baillot was not only a great violinist--he was a

great professor. The number of excellent violinists who were his pupils

is considerable. His school produced Habeneck and Mazas--both of whom

were eminent artists. Having become professor at the Conservatory of

Paris, and the successor of his master, Habeneck produced some clever

pupils, at the head of whom stands M. Alard, the present chief of the

French school.

Lafont, too, one of the bright glories of the French school of

violinists, was, at first, the pupil of Kreutzer. Dissatisfied with the

style of his master, which did not sympathise with his own, he joined

the school of Rode, which seemed formed for the development of his own

qualities, combining grace, purity, elegance, and charm--qualities

which, subsequently, with study, rendered him a perfect master of his

art. The perfection of his intonation was so certain--the style of his

bowing so seductive--his taste so exquisite in his ornament--that, if

the sentiment of grandeur left anything to be desired, it was scarcely

perceptible, it was lost in the rapture created by his grace and

delicacy.

A new school has been formed. I allude to the Belgian school for the

Violin, which numbers a nation of heroes, the chiefs of whom are De

Bériot and Vieuxtemps; but, convinced that the history of one’s friends

is as difficult to write as that of one’s enemies, I shall leave to

future historians the agreeable task of handing down to posterity the

names of these glories of their country.

Germany has produced several schools of violinists, whose principal

qualities have been perfect intonation and neat execution; but which

in the eighteenth century, especially, wanted a more powerful tone

and broadness of execution. The prodigies invented by Walther in the

seventeenth century, seem not to have left any traces. Italy and

Bohemia were the cradles of two schools of German violinists, from

whence the others proceeded.

Corelli, who disseminated everywhere the effects of his powerful

influence, was first violinist in the chapel of the Margrave of

Anspach, in 1699, when Pisendel, then choir-boy, became his pupil,

and made such progress under his guidance, that he became first

violinist of the chapel in 1702. This Pisendel, having become an

eminent violinist, was attached to the Court of Saxony as master of

the concerts, and opened, at Dresden, a school for the Violin. All the

traditions of his master were transmitted to his pupils, but with the

mannerism that was in vogue at the Court of Dresden. It was here the

talent of Johann Gottlieb Graun, brother of the celebrated composer

of that name, and master of the concerts of Frederick the Great, King

of Prussia, was formed. Graun possessed sterling talent, of which he

afforded many proofs, both by the pupils he made and by twenty-nine

concertos for the Violin in manuscript, some of which I have seen, and

which evince a remarkable degree of cleverness. In his youth, when

he left the school of Pisendel, he went to Italy, and there received

lessons from Tartini, whose style he adopted.

The school for the Violin founded in Bohemia, commenced by Konieseck of

Prague. Konieseck is only known as having been the master of Francis

Benda, a great artist, born at Althenatka, in Bohemia, the 23rd of

November, 1709. His first master was a blind Jew, of the name of

Lœbel, a very eminent violinist. He subsequently became the pupil of

Konieseck, and acquired his brilliant style, though deficient in tone,

which he transmitted to all his pupils. The school of Benda, from which

proceeded his two sons, Ramnitz, Rust, Matthes, and several others, was

celebrated for a long period in Germany. From this school came most of

the Saxon and Prussian violinists. Benda, after the death of Graun,

succeeded him as master of the concerts at the Court of Prussia in

1772, and died at Potsdam in 1786.

John Charles Stamitz, a remarkable violinist, and distinguished

composer, emanated from Bohemia; he was born in 1719, his Violin master

was a monk of the Abbey of Reichenau, the Father Czernohorsky. Being

in the service of the Palatinate Elector in 1745, Stamitz became

the founder of the celebrated school of Mannheim, which produced the

greater number of the German violinists of later days. The concertos

of Stamitz, and a duet for one Violin, several times published,

would alone suffice to prove the great capabilities of this artist:

even did his pupils not bear evidence in favour of this judgment.

Among his pupils were his two sons, Charles and Anthony, Canabich,

Foerster, and several others. Christian Canabich succeeded his master;

and his pupils were William Cramer, Danner, Ignace Fraenzel, all of

whom were distinguished artists, but of different styles. Cramer and

Danner possessed broadness in the style of bowing, but Fraenzel was a

graceful and elegant performer, though his tone was somewhat thin. A

pupil of Danner, John Frederick Eck, born at Mannheim in 1766, became

a brilliant violinist of this school. This artist, director of the

concerts of the Court of Munich, was the master of Spohr--at least,

as far as talent can be formed, until individual organisation and

meditation receive the stamp of personality. Louis Spohr has founded a

Violin school in Germany, on a more extended and more vigorous scale

than those of his predecessors. When Paganini heard him at Venice, he

spoke of him in unqualified terms of approbation. This worthy artist

has formed many pupils, who occupy most honourable positions in the

large cities, and he has exposed the principles of his school in an

extensive work, published by Haslinger, of Vienna, and subsequently

translated into French and English.

[Illustration]

[Illustration]

Nicolo Paganini.

Genius--talent, whatever its extent--cannot always count upon

popularity. Susceptibility of the highest conceptions of the most

sublime creations, frequently fail in securing the attention of the

multitude. How is this most coveted point to be attained? It would be

difficult to arrive at any precise conclusion, from the fact that it

applies to matters totally differing from each other; it is, however,

perhaps possible to define the aggregation of qualities required to

move the public in masses, by calling it “sympathetic wonderment.”

Fortunate boldness is its characteristic mark; originality its absolute

condition. The most renowned popularities of the nineteenth century

have each differed in their specialty,--Napoleon Bonaparte, Rossini,

and Paganini. Many other names, doubtless, recall talents of the finest

order, and personalities of the highest value; yet, notwithstanding

their having been duly appreciated by the intelligent and enlightened

classes, they have not called forth those outbursts of enthusiasm

which have been manifested towards others during an entire generation.

The truly popular name appears surrounded by its prestige, even to

the lowest degrees of the social scale; such was the case with the

prodigious artist who is the object of this notice.

Nicolo Paganini, the most extraordinary--the most renowned violinist

of the nineteenth century--was born on February the 18th, 1784. His

father, Antonio Paganini, a commercial broker, or simply a broker’s

clerk, according to some biographers, was passionately fond of music,

and played upon the mandoline. His penetration soon discovered the

aptitude of his son for this art. He resolved that study should

develope it. His excessive severity would have probably led to results

contrary to those he expected, had not the younger Paganini been

endowed with the firm determination of becoming an artist. From the

age of six years he was a musician, and played the Violin. The lessons

he received from his father, as may be presumed, were not given in the

most gentle manner. The ill-treatment to which he was subjected during

this period of his youth, appears to have exercised a fatal influence

upon his nervous and delicate constitution. From his first attempts

he was imbued with the disposition to execute feats of strength and

agility upon his instrument. His instinct urged him to attempt the most

extraordinary things; his precocious skill exciting the astonishment of

his young friends. His confidence in the future was not to be shaken,

from the fact of his mother saying to him one day, “My son, you will be

a great musician. An angel, radiant with beauty, appeared to me during

the night, and, addressing me, spoke thus: ‘If thou wouldst proffer a

wish, it shall be accomplished.’ I asked that you should become the

greatest of all violinists, and the angel promised the fulfilment of my

desire.”

His father’s lessons soon became useless, and Servetto, a musician

of the theatre, at Genoa, became his teacher; but even he was not

possessed of sufficient ability to be of benefit to this predestined

artist. Paganini received his instructions for a short period only, and

he was placed under Giacomo Costa, director of music, and principal

violinist to the churches of Genoa, under whose care he progressed

rapidly. He had now attained his eighth year, when he wrote his first

sonata, which he unfortunately took no care of, and has been lost among

many other of his productions. His countryman, Gnecco, a distinguished

composer, encouraged the visits of the boy, and tendered counsel

which doubtless aided him materially in his progress. Costa only gave

him lessons for six months, during which period he obliged his pupil

to play in the churches. But the master’s instructions were not at

all satisfactory to the pupil, who had already conceived a method of

fingering and bowing.

Having reached his ninth year, the young _virtuoso_ appeared in

public, for the first time, in a concert at the large theatre of his

native town, given by the excellent soprano Marchesi, with the vocalist

Albertinatti. These two artists sang subsequently at a concert for

Paganini’s benefit, and in both these instances this extraordinary

child played variations of his own composition on the French air,

“la Carmagnole,” amid the frenzied acclamations of an enthusiastic

audience. About this period of his life the father was advised, by

judicious friends, to place the boy under good masters of the Violin

and composition; and he shortly after took him to Parma, where

Alexandro Rolla then resided, so celebrated for his performance, as

conductor of the orchestra, and as a composer. Paganini was now twelve

years of age. The following anecdote, related by M. Schottky, and which

Paganini published in a Vienna journal, furnishes interesting details

of the master’s first interview with the young artist:--“On arriving

at Rolla’s house, he said, we found him ill, and in bed. His wife

conducted us into a room adjoining the one where the sick man lay, in

order to concert with her husband, who, it appeared, was not at all

disposed to receive us. Perceiving upon the table of the chamber into

which we were ushered a Violin, and the last concerto of Rolla, I took

up the Violin and played the piece at first sight. Surprised at what

he heard, the composer inquired the name of the _virtuoso_ he had just

heard. When he heard it was only a mere lad, he would not give credence

to the fact unless by ocular demonstration. Thus satisfied, he told

me, that he could teach me nothing, and recommended me to take lessons

in composition from Paër.” The evident desire evinced by Paganini to

refute the supposition of his having received lessons from Rolla, is a

singularity difficult to account for. Gervasoni, who knew him at Parma

at this period, affirms[C] that he was the pupil of Rolla for several

months. However, it was not Paër, then in Germany, who taught Paganini

harmony and counterpoint, but Ghiretti, who had directed the studies

of Paër himself. During six months this precocious artist received

three lessons weekly, and specially applied himself to the study of

instrumentation. Even now Paganini was occupied in discovering new

effects on his instrument. Frequent discussions took place between him

and Rolla on the innovations which the young artist contemplated, and

which he could, at this period, only execute imperfectly, whilst the

severe taste of his master deprecated these bold attempts, except for

the sake of occasional effects. It was, however, only after his return

to Genoa, that Paganini wrote his first compositions for the Violin.

This music was so difficult that he was obliged to study it himself

with increasing perseverance, and to make constant efforts to solve

problems unknown to all other violinists. He was seen to have tried the

same passage in a thousand different ways during ten or twelve hours,

and to be completely overwhelmed with fatigue at the end of the day.

It is by this unexampled perseverance that he overcame difficulties

which were considered insurmountable by contemporary artists, when he

published a specimen in the shape of a collection of studies.

Quitting Parma, at the commencement of 1797, Paganini made his first

professional tour with his father through all the principal towns in

Lombardy, and commenced a reputation which increased daily from that

period. On his return to Genoa, and after having, in solitude, made

the efforts necessary for the development of his talent, he began to

feel the weight of the chain by which he was held by his father, and

determined to release himself from the ill-treatment to which he was

still subjected under the paternal roof. His artistic soul revolted

at this degrading slavery, and felt that some respect was due to him.

A favourable opportunity alone was required to execute his design.

This soon presented itself. The fête of St. Martin was celebrated

annually at Lucca by a musical festival, to which persons flocked from

every part of Italy. As this period approached, Paganini entreated

his father to permit him to attend it, accompanied by his elder

brother. His demand was at first met with a peremptory refusal; but

the solicitations of the son, and the prayers of the mother, finally

prevailed, and the heart of the young artist, at liberty for the first

time, bounded with joy and he set out agitated by dreams of success

and happiness. At Lucca he was received with enthusiasm. Encouraged by

this propitious débût, he visited Pisa, and some other towns, in all of

which his success was unequivocal. The year 1799 had just commenced,

and Paganini had not attained his fifteenth year. This is not the age

of prudence. His moral education had been grossly neglected, and the

severity which assailed his more youthful years, was not calculated to

awaken him to the dangers of a life of freedom. Freed from restraint,

and relishing the delights of his new-born independence, he formed

connections with other artists, whose sole abilities seemed to consist

in encouraging a taste for gambling in young men of family and means,

and turning the tables upon them to their own advantage. Paganini, in

this manner, frequently lost the produce of several concerts in one

night, and was consequently often in a state of great embarrassment.

His talent soon procured fresh resources, and time passed gaily enough,

alternately between good and bad fortune. He was frequently reduced, by

distress, to part with his Violin. In this condition he found himself

at Leghorn, and was indebted to the kindness of a French merchant,

(M. Livron), a distinguished amateur, for the loan of a Violin, an

excellent Guarnieri. When the concert had concluded, Paganini brought

it back to its owner, when this gentleman exclaimed, “Never will I

profane strings which your fingers have touched; that instrument is

now yours.” This is the Violin Paganini afterwards used in all his

concerts. A similar event occurred to him at Parma, but under different

circumstances. Pasini, an eminent painter, and an excellent amateur

performer on the Violin, had disbelieved the prodigious faculty imputed

to Paganini, of playing the most difficult music at first sight, as

well as if he had maturely studied it. He brought him a manuscript

concerto, containing the most difficult passages, imagined almost

by every performer as insurmountable, and placing in his hands an

excellent instrument of Stradiuari, added, “This instrument shall be

yours, if you can play, in a masterly manner, that concerto at first

sight.” “If that is the case,” replied Paganini, “you may bid adieu to

it,” and he forthwith, by his exquisite performance of the piece, threw

Pasini into extatic admiration.

Adventures of every kind characterise this period of Paganini’s early

days; the enthusiasm of art, love, and gambling, divided his time,

despite the warnings of a delicate constitution, which proclaimed the

necessity of great care. Heedless of everything, he continued his

career of dissipation, until the prostration of all his faculties

forced a respite. He would then lie up for several weeks, in a state

of absolute repose, until, with refreshed energies, he recommenced his

artistic career and wandering life. Unexpected resources occasionally

relieved him from positive poverty. In this position, at seventeen

years of age, being at Leghorn, in 1801, he became acquainted with a

wealthy Swedish amateur, whose favourite instrument was the bassoon.

Complaining that he could meet with no music for his instrument,

sufficiently difficult for his talent, Paganini provided him with

compositions almost impracticable, for which he was richly rewarded.

It was to be feared that this dissolute life would ultimately deprive

the world of his marvellous talent, when an unforeseen and important

circumstance, related by himself, ended his fatal passion for gambling.

“I shall never forget,” he said, “that I one day, placed myself in

a position which was to decide my future. The Prince of ---- had,

for some time, coveted the possession of my Violin--the only one I

possessed at that period, and which I still have. He, on one particular

occasion, was extremely anxious that I should mention the sum for which

I would dispose of it; but not wishing to part with my instrument, I

declared I would not sell it for 250 gold napoleons. Some time after

the Prince said to me that I was, doubtless, only speaking in jest

in asking such a sum, but that he would be willing to give me 2,000

francs. I was, at this moment, in the greatest want of money to meet a

debt of honour I had incurred at play, and was almost tempted to accept

the proffered amount, when I received an invitation to a party that

evening at a friend’s house. All my capital consisted of thirty francs,

as I had disposed of all my jewels, watch, rings, and brooches, &c. I

resolved on risking this last resource; and, if fortune proved fickle,

to sell my Violin to the Prince and to proceed to St. Petersburg,

without instrument or luggage, with the view of re-establishing my

affairs; my thirty francs were reduced to three, and I fancied myself

on the road to Russia, when suddenly my fortune took a sudden turn;

and, with the small remains of my capital I won 160 francs. This amount

saved my Violin, and completely set me up. From that day I abjured

gambling--to which I had sacrificed part of my youth--convinced that a

gamester is an object of contempt to all well-regulated minds.”

Although he was still in the prime of youth, Paganini knew of nothing

but success and profit, when, during one of those hallucinations to

which all great artists are subject, the Violin lost its attractions

in his eyes. A lady of rank having fallen desperately in love with

him, and the feeling being reciprocated, he withdrew with her to an

estate she possessed in Tuscany.[D] This lady played the Guitar, and

Paganini imbibed a taste for that instrument, and applied himself as

sedulously to its practice as he had formerly done with the Violin. He

soon discovered new resources, which he imparted to his friend; and

during a period of three years, he devoted all the energies of his

mind to its study, and to agricultural pursuits, for which the lady’s

estate afforded him ample opportunities. It was at this period he wrote

his two sonatas for Guitar and Violin, which form his second and third

works.

Love cools with time in a castle as in a cottage. Paganini discovered

this; all his former penchant for the Violin returned, and he decided

on resuming his travels. On his return to Genoa, in 1804, he occupied

himself solely with composition, and wrote here his fourth work which

consists of four grand quartetts for Violin, Viol, Guitar, and

Violoncello; and bravura variations for Violin, on an original theme,

with Guitar accompaniment, which forms his fifth work. It appears too,

that at this period he gave instruction on the Violin to Catarina

Calcagno,[E] born at Genoa, in 1797, who, at the age of fifteen,

astounded Italy by the boldness of her style. All traces of her seem

lost after 1816. Towards the middle of 1805, Paganini left Genoa, to

undertake a new tour in Italy. The first town he visited was Lucca,

the scene of his first successes. Here he again created so great a

sensation by a concerto he performed at a nocturnal festival in a

convent chapel, that the monks were obliged to leave their stalls, in

order to repress the applause which burst forth despite the sanctity

of the place. He was then twenty-one years of age. The principality of

Lucca and Piombino had been organised in the month of March, of the

same year, in favour of the Princess Eliza, sister of Napoleon, and the

wife of Prince Bacciochi. The Court had fixed its residence in the town

of Lucca. The great reputation of the violinist induced the Princess to

offer him the posts of director of her private music, and conductor of

the opera orchestra. Notwithstanding his propensity for independence of

action, and although the emoluments were scanty, the position pleased

him, and he accepted it. The Prince Bacciochi received instruction from

him on the Violin. The Princess, who had appreciated the originality of

his talent, induced him to extend his discoveries of novel effects upon

the instrument. To convince him of the interest he had inspired her

with, she granted him the grade of captain in the royal gendarmerie,

so that he might be admitted with his brilliant costume to all the

great Court receptions. Paganini added many novelties to those which

characterised his talent. Thus, seeking to vary the effect of his

instrument at the Court concerts, where it was his duty to play, he

removed the second and third strings, and composed a dialogue for the

first and fourth strings. He has related this circumstance himself

nearly in these terms:--

Biographical notice of Nicolo Paganini With an analysis of his compositions, and a sketch of the history of the violin. · 第 2 / 8 段