Besides the works we have mentioned, Sir Anthony Panizzi was the author

of an essay in Italian entitled "Chi era Francesco da Bologna?" in which

that artist, the inventor of italic type, is identified with the great

painter Francesco Francia; and the editor of Lord Vernon's sumptuous

verbatim reprint of the first four editions of the Divine Comedy,

respectively printed at Foligno, Jesi, Mantua, and Naples. He further

wrote some pamphlets on questions connected with the British Museum and

the Catalogue of the Royal Society's Library, and contributed several

articles on political and literary subjects to the _Edinburgh_,

_Quarterly_, and _North British Reviews_.

Sir Anthony Panizzi's was a rich and complex nature, and his character

cannot be sketched in a phrase; else we might feel tempted to sum it up

in two characteristics, magnanimity and warmth of heart. Other traits,

however, must be added to complete the portrait—prodigious power of

will, indomitable perseverance, hatred of inefficiency and pretence,

active and disinterested kindness, impetuosity held in check by

circumspect sagacity. He might be said to combine the characteristics of

the land of his birth and the land of his adoption: his moral nature

seemed English, his intellect Italian. Warmth of feeling gave after all

the keynote to his existence. He was, indeed, jealous of his well-won

fame, but fame was not his main object. If he greatly helped his Museum,

his country, his colleagues, it was because he began by greatly caring

for them. In labouring for the public he erected an imperishable

monument for himself:—

"Ipsa quidem virtus sibimet pulcherrima merces;

Dulce tamen venit ad manes, cum gloria vitæ

Durat apud superos nec edunt oblivia laudem."

FOOTNOTES:

[288:1] _Athenæum_, April 19, 1879.

THE LATE JOHN WINTER JONES, V.P.S.A.,

PRINCIPAL LIBRARIAN OF THE BRITISH MUSEUM, AND

FIRST PRESIDENT OF THE LIBRARY ASSOCIATION

OF THE UNITED KINGDOM.[304:1]

The conference of the Library Association at London, in 1881, was

painfully signalised by the funeral in the same city of its first

President, who had presided over its inauguration at the preliminary

London conference four years previously, and to whose countenance it had

been indebted for much of the success which attended its establishment.

A short notice of Mr. Winter Jones's distinguished career as a librarian

seems to be demanded by his services to the Association and his peculiar

relation to it as its first President, no less than by the position

which, in his capacity of Principal Librarian of the British Museum, he

so long occupied at the head of the profession of librarianship in this

country.

John Winter Jones was born at Lambeth, June 16, 1805, and belonged to a

family long established in Carmarthenshire, and already honourably

connected with literature. His father, John Jones, Esq., author of

"Hawthorn Cottage" and other tales, for many years edited the _Naval

Chronicle_ and _European Magazine_. His grandfather, Mr. Giles Jones,

had been secretary to the York Buildings Water-Works, and according to

the unanimous tradition of the family was author of several of the

admirable little books published for children about the middle of last

century by Newbery & Co., including the renowned "Goody Two Shoes." No

more conclusive proof of the merit of "Goody Two Shoes" could be given

than the able argument by which Mr. Charles Welsh has recently sought to

attribute the authorship to Goldsmith. While agreeing with Mr. Welsh

that the book is not unworthy of Goldsmith in humour, philanthropy, and

simple truth to nature, we are unable to discover any such similarity of

style as to warrant its being ascribed to him. On the other hand, the

peculiar vein of dry humour characteristic of "Goody Two Shoes"

reappeared in Mr. Winter Jones's conversation in so remarkable a degree

as to justify the impression that he had preserved a family trait.

Assuredly, had he ever essayed his powers in the field of imaginative

literature, "Goody Two Shoes" is the kind of work which one would have

expected him to have produced. A great-uncle, Mr. Griffith Jones, had

been the friend of Johnson and Goldsmith; an uncle, Mr. Stephen Jones,

was also known in literature, especially as the author of "Masonic

Miscellanies," and editor and continuer of Baker's "Biographia

Dramatica." Mr. Winter Jones's mother, Mary Walker, was cousin to the

academician Smirke; nor, in the list of remarkable persons connected

with him, should his nurse be forgotten, Anne Parker, widow of the

unfortunate Parker who was executed as ringleader of the mutiny at the

Nore.

Mr. Jones received his education at St. Paul's School. He does not

appear to have been eminent as a classical scholar, but some youthful

letters show how early he had acquired the power of writing excellent

English. He was, moreover, unusually precocious as an author, although

his first attempt was by no means ambitious. In 1822 appeared an

anonymous little book, now exceedingly rare, "Riddles, Charades, and

Conundrums: with a Preface on the Antiquity of Riddles," containing a

considerable number of original enigmas—a truly quaint and exceptional

performance for a youth of seventeen. Mr. Jones's juvenile ambition,

however, was stimulated to this undertaking by an accomplished lady,

Mrs. Davies, mother of Sir Lancelot Shadwell, who thought highly of his

talents, and had a considerable share in it.

The profession designed for Mr. Jones was that of a Chancery barrister.

After leaving school he became the pupil of Mr. Bythewood, of Lincoln's

Inn, the most eminent conveyancer of his day, who had a very high

opinion of him.[306:1] He must, however, have devoted much of his time

to studies not of a legal nature, for about this time he became an

excellent scholar in the modern languages, not taught, or taught

imperfectly, in St. Paul's School. His proficiency is proved by a little

volume undertaken for his own amusement, but published at the suggestion

of his sister: "A Translation of all the Greek, Latin, Italian, and

French Quotations in Blackstone's Commentaries, and in the notes of the

editions by Christian, Archbold, and Williams. By J. Winter Jones,

1823." He also made the index to the new edition of Wynne's "Eunomus, or

Dialogues concerning the Law and Constitution of England."

Just as Mr. Jones was looking forward to being called to the Chancery

Bar his prospects were clouded, and his course in life altogether

changed, by a most serious illness, greatly aggravated by the improper

treatment of a physician who entirely mistook the nature of the

complaint. The result was a temporary loss of voice, accompanied by a

weakness of the chest which for several years rendered any speaking in

public impossible. Between ill-health and the want of introductions and

connections in any but the legal profession, Mr. Jones seems to have

been unable for some years to follow any definite calling. He pursued

his studies as far as possible, learned Spanish from the refugees who at

that time abounded in Islington and Somers Town, and even acquired some

knowledge of Russian, destined to be very useful in future years. To

this time also belonged his acquaintance with Jerdan and Godwin. He knew

the latter intimately, and was impressed by his intellectual eminence,

but used to describe him as a man selfish in minor things, who must,

like Harold Skimpole, always have his plate of fruit, no matter the

price or the season. Of the second Mrs. Godwin he had a higher opinion

than seems to have been usually entertained by her acquaintance. A

narrow escape of his life which he had at this time may be best narrated

in his own words, so characteristic of the man's coolness and aversion

to fuss or display, even when the occasion might seem to excuse them:—

"SOUTHAMPTON, _September 9, 1833_.

"MY DEAR FATHER,—I am extremely sorry that I cannot profit by

your directions for swimming. On Friday week I went to bathe at

the new baths, being my second attempt in cold water. No one

was in the bath at the time, nor was there any rope, but as I

thought the place was perfectly safe, I plunged in backwards

according to the directions I had received. I sank, of course,

and throwing up my chest rose immediately, but when in the

water I lay on my back motionless from cramp in my stomach.

By no effort that I could make could I force down my feet or

turn, and my struggles caused my head to dip so frequently

that had assistance been delayed a minute longer I must have

been suffocated. I fortunately recollected having read that

persons are sure to float if they throw back the head as far as

possible, thereby elevating the chest, and remain quite quiet.

This saved me. I mentioned the circumstance to Dr. Shadwell,

and he strongly recommended me to abstain from the water at

present, as it evidently did not agree with me."

About two years from the date of this letter, Mr. Jones obtained his

first important public employment as a secretary to that then itinerant

body, the Charity Commissioners. The charitable institutions of England,

long corrupted and misused, were receiving a much-needed overhauling,

one of the indirect fruits of the Reform agitation. Perambulating bodies

of commissioners were traversing the length and breadth of the land,

"wanting to know, you know," and eliciting an amount of information

which could not have been obtained without the direct personal pressure

of inquisitors upon the spot. Their labours produced much excellent

fruit, and restored a vast amount of charitable endowment to its

legitimate uses. The records survive in ponderous Blue-Books; and the

student of general literature may derive an idea of the nature of their

investigations, which it is to be hoped he will not take too literally,

from the lively ridicule of "Crotchet Castle." When the satirist

declared that the labours of the Commissioners did no good to any living

soul, he certainly ought to have excepted Mr. Winter Jones, who accepted

his appointment—as he told the present writer—mainly in the hope of

re-establishing his shattered health by a course of travel and living in

the open air. This object he fully attained. The few letters he wrote to

his family on his tour that have been preserved are full of racy

humour, and suggest what a page of English life might have been

presented by a record of the more private experiences of the Commission,

too familiar to be registered in Blue-Books. As nothing of the sort

exists, it may not be improper to preserve two specimens here,

notwithstanding their want of connection with bibliography:—

"MARKET HARBOROUGH, _Nov. 20, 1836_.

"Harborough is a monstrously stupid place, possessing no

interest that I have yet discovered either in the form of

situation or antiquities. The inhabitants of the county are

principally graziers and fox-hunters, men of substance,

coarse in their manners, and tolerably hospitable. Of the

few clergymen I have yet seen, little can be said in praise.

One has been suspended for his profligate habits; another

drinks so hard that he is incapable of performing the duties

of his church, being frequently insane; and a third attended

yesterday at our board with his church-warden, both of whom

were so fuddled that they could with difficulty make themselves

understood. . . . We have a vast deal of business to transact,

and every prospect of our work increasing. The labour is not so

much occasioned by the extent or intricacy of the charities,

as by the provoking stolidity of those who ought to be fully

informed upon the subject. There exists in this part of the

county a very extraordinary charity founded by a clergyman

named Hanbury, who prepared seventeen deeds for the foundation

of various branches of one grand charity. The property settled

is directed to accumulate until the proceeds amount to £10,000

per annum (they are at present about £500), when a cathedral

is to be erected at a cost of £150,000, and professorships

of music, poetry, philosophy, botany, &c. &c., established.

One of his deeds he heads, 'Beef for ever,' another, 'Organs

for ever,' a third, 'Schools for ever,' with much of the same

oddity. He has published a thick octavo volume with an account

of his charity and a copy of his foundation deeds. The latter

occupy 248 pages of the work, so if I have to abstract the

whole of them it is impossible to say when my labours will end."

"LEICESTER, _Feb. 5, 1837_.

"Our third and last visit was to a Mr. Hildebrand, a clergyman,

and head-master of the Kibworth free grammar school. This poor

fellow has just had his wife, mother-in-law, eight children,

and two servants confined to their beds with influenza, and

I never beheld an assemblage of more ghastly objects than we

formed at the dinner-table. With the exception of one, we had

all pale cheeks, red eyes, and every other sort of _phizzical_

ugliness, the excepted one had a blue complexion approaching to

black. Mr. Hildebrand, however, assured me the next morning at

breakfast that the hearty dinner he had made, and drinking as

much wine as pleased him (he was, by-the-bye, a long time in

being pleased) had completely removed his disorder. I may make

the same remark respecting myself. The necessity I have been

under of drinking wine every day has almost totally removed my

complaint. I have nothing now to complain of but a considerable

degree of nervous debility, which I hope will depart in a few

days."

The conclusion of the rural peregrinations of the Commission at the

beginning of 1837 threatened Mr. Jones with loss of employment, although

he was still engaged in town in reducing its voluminous proceedings to

print, and the extant correspondence shows that his work was very

important. He says in a letter of this period:—

"I am ready to be knocked down to the highest bidder in any honourable

service, and have no objection to write speeches and pamphlets and frame

bills for laws and schemes for mines provided I am properly remunerated,

but there's the rub." The real occupation of his life, however, was

unexpectedly at hand. Within two months after writing as above he was

appointed (April 1837) to the situation of permanent assistant in the

Printed Book Department of the British Museum. The suggestion that he

should apply for this post seems to have come from his friend Mr.

Nicholas Carlisle, an assistant-officer who had come to the Museum from

Windsor, along with the King's Library, and who is perhaps best

remembered by a work on the endowed grammar schools of England, valuable

in its time. The application was, moreover, strongly supported by Mr.

Johnstone, a member of the Charity Commission, who had been greatly

impressed by Mr. Jones's efficiency in his secretaryship, and who

enlisted his father, Sir Alexander Johnstone's, influence with the

Archbishop of Canterbury, in whose hands all appointments to the Museum

then practically rested. At the end of 1837, upon the resignation of the

Assistant-Keeper, Mr. Cary, Mr. Jones became a candidate for the office.

Short as his connection with the Museum had then been, he still had the

claim of seniority. But he had gained the esteem and confidence of Mr.

Panizzi, the Keeper, and Mr. Panizzi was obnoxious to persons

influential with the Archbishop, who accordingly replied that "his

connection with the establishment is of recent date," and apprehended

"that due consideration for the claims of others will put it out of my

power to serve him upon the present occasion." Who these others were did

not appear, and it seemed still more difficult to identify them when,

after some delay, the appointment was conferred upon a gentleman,

undoubtedly possessed of the highest talents and the greatest

attainments, but who could have no claim upon the Museum, as he had no

connection with it. It is to Mr. Jones's honour that he manifested no

resentment, and always maintained the most friendly relations with his

successful competitor, whose son now records the fact. "But," he said to

the writer many years afterwards, "from that hour I determined that I

would be Principal Librarian."

From this time forward Mr. Jones's history is almost entirely identified

with that of the library of the British Museum. He was entering upon

his duties at the period of the most important changes that have ever

taken place in that institution. The Parliamentary Committees of 1835-36

had proved the necessity for extensive reforms in every department of

the Museum. The Trustees had already been for some years occupied with

plans for a new catalogue of printed books. The removal of the library

from its old quarters in Montague House to the new buildings was about

to take place. It was fortunate, indeed, that just at this juncture the

library should have acquired so eminent an administrator as Sir Anthony

Panizzi, and in Mr. Jones an assistant who, though not especially gifted

with the power of initiative, was in diligence, fidelity, accuracy,

intelligence, and calm good sense as efficient a lieutenant as an able

administrator could desire.

After the removal of the library had been completed, with the assistance

of Messrs. Watts and Bullen, the next important task was the preparation

of the rules for the new catalogue, in which it is probable that Mr.

Jones took the largest share. They were prepared under Mr. Panizzi's

chief direction, with the co-operation of Messrs. Jones, Watts, Parry,

and Edwards. The extent of time devoted to them, and the extreme

thoroughness of the discussion, appears from Mr. Parry's evidence before

the Royal Commission of 1849, and Mr. Edwards's history of the British

Museum. They were finally accepted by the Trustees and officially

promulgated in July 1839. In one important respect, the rule to be

adopted for cataloguing anonymous books, the judgment of the compilers

was overruled by the Trustees, and this is the source of many of the

criticisms to which the rules themselves have been subjected. As a

whole, they have received almost universal approbation; and their merit

is sufficiently established by the circumstance of their having formed

an epoch in bibliography as the basis of all subsequent work of the same

nature. Very much of the discrepancy of opinion as regards cataloguing

results from the failure to distinguish between the requisites of large

and small libraries. The present writer is bound to say that in his

opinion the alteration introduced by the Trustees is justified by a

consideration of which the Trustees probably did not think, its indirect

effect in providing, in the case of anonymous books, some kind of a

substitute for what was then, and is still, the great deficiency of the

British Museum library, an index of subjects. The same remark applies to

the adoption of the headings "Academies," "Ephemerides," and "Periodical

Publications," the introduction of biographical cross-references, and

other features of the catalogue, perhaps exceptionable in theory, but

assuredly very convenient in practice.

The catalogue was now (August 1839) fairly commenced under the immediate

personal direction and responsibility of Mr. Panizzi. Mr. Jones,

however, held from the first a primacy among the assistants actually

engaged in its compilation, which became enhanced as the difficulties of

the task became more apparent from day to day. It had been supposed

that the old titles might pass with slight examination: they proved to

require the most careful revision; and the work of the revisers needed

to be in its turn revised. Subject to a reference to Mr. Panizzi in

extreme cases, Mr. Jones was the ultimate authority. His clear head,

legal habit of mind, and attention to minute bibliographical accuracy,

rendered him invaluable in this capacity, and his decisions constitute

the basis and most essential part of the body of unprinted law which

unforeseen exigencies gradually superinduced upon the original rules. He

also took a leading part in the revision of the proofs. The causes of

the suspension of the printing of the catalogue have been so fully

treated by the writer in a paper at the Cambridge meeting of the Library

Association, that it is needless to enter upon them here. It made no

difference to the amount of Mr. Jones's labours, except as regarded the

correction of the press. He continued to work upon the catalogue and

also upon the supplementary catalogue of books added to the library,

both as reviser and as general supervisor, until he became Keeper of

Printed Books in 1856. His other duties were numerous and important: he

exercised, in particular, the immediate control of the attendants, a

responsibility the more onerous in proportion to the continual increase

of the establishment. In 1843 he was engaged along with Mr. Watts in

collecting the materials on which Mr. Panizzi based his famous report on

the deficiencies of the library, which ultimately occasioned so large

an increase in the annual grant. In 1849 he prepared for the Royal

Commission that crushing exposure of Mr. J. P. Collier's notions of

short and easy methods of cataloguing which should be especially valued

by librarians, as it is perhaps the best practical illustration to be

found anywhere of the difficulties attaching to the correct

bibliographical description of a book. He was also enabled to devote

some attention to literature. About 1842 he wrote a large number of

articles for the Dictionary of Universal Biography, edited by Mr. George

Long for the Society for the Diffusion of Useful Knowledge, a great and

meritorious undertaking, unfortunately not carried beyond letter A,

although the continuation as far as BE was actually in type. Mr. Jones's

articles chiefly treated of obscure or forgotten writers, and required

much research. He also contributed to the _Quarterly_ and _North

British_ Reviews; his article in the latter on the British Museum

Library (1851) is the best account of its administration to be found

anywhere. He carried on an extensive correspondence with Mr. Wilson

Croker, who continually had recourse to him for information on literary

subjects. In 1847 he contributed to the _Archæologia_ "Observations on

the Division of Man's Life into Stages," with especial reference to

Shakespeare's descriptions of the seven ages of man, and about this time

wrote several other papers. In 1850 he edited for the Hakluyt Society

"Divers Voyages touching the Discovery of America"; and in 1856, "The

Travels of Nicolò Conti in the East," translated from the Italian of

Poggio Bracciolini. In 1858 he translated for the same Society the

Oriental travels of Lodovico di Varthema, edited, with a preface, by his

friend Dr. G. P. Badger.

Essays in Librarianship and Bibliography · 第 19 / 21 段