Nothing, indeed, is more characteristic of the early printers than the

stress they laid upon accuracy. From another colophon we learn that an

edition of Sallust at that early period consisted of five hundred

copies. In another the same printer declares that he will deign to sell

nothing that is not perfectly correct. In another he talks of having

carefully expurgated his author, as if he had been printing Juvenal or

Martial, but as the author is a divine the remark can only refer to the

correctness of the text. John of Cologne goes further still, and asserts

that his book is absolutely immaculate:

"Emptor, habes careant omni qui crimine libri,

Quos securus emas, procul et quibus exulat error."

Occasionally the corrector's name is mentioned. A remarkable instance of

this is where Vindelinus de Spira prints an Italian book, the "Divine

Comedy," the language of which he probably would not understand, when

Christoval Berardi, of Pesaro, is especially named as the corrector in

an Italian sonnet probably composed by himself. In an instance of an

arithmetical work the printer, Erhard Ratdolt, distinctly claims the

merit of the correctness of the press as his personal merit, and we

learn from other sources that he was a good mathematician.

Another class of colophon sets forth the deserts of the author instead

of those of the printer, and it is noteworthy that these, when in verse,

are generally expressed in a more elegant style. It is to be regretted

that the verses written for Sweynheym and Pannartz, the fathers of the

art in Italy, were generally so bad; yet there is something to be

learned from them. We discover that they thought it necessary to

apologise for their uncouth German names (_Aspera ridebis Teutonica

nomina forsan_); and that a Roman patrician named Maximus—a man to be

ever honoured for his public spirit—had given them and their press

house-room in his palace. We learn from other colophons that an edition

of Sallust consisting of four hundred copies, and that two editions of

Cicero's Epistles to his friends, were carried through the press in four

months. The comparative cheapness of typography is also a frequent

matter of congratulation. It is said to have brought Virgil within the

reach of all scholars, and to have enabled every man to be his own

lawyer; but the printer seldom tells us what the price of the volume

was. We observe that the trade of the book-producer has not yet become

differentiated into the two great classes of printers and publishers.

While, as before remarked, there is every reason to conclude that the

early printers were persons of liberal education, we do not, so far as I

am aware, find evidence of this mechanical craft being exercised by men

of gentle blood. I have, however, already mentioned the priestly

printer, Clemente Patavino, and a colophon reveals that the printers of

one book were two priests. One rather wonders what became meanwhile of

their religious duties. I suppose that a priest would not in general

have been allowed to follow a secular calling, at least openly, but in

this instance of printing there is no attempt at concealment. A

circumstance honourable in its way to the craft to which we owe our

existence, and suggesting that the ecclesiastical authorities of the

fifteenth century thought of printers as our friend Mr. Dewey rightly

tells we ought to think of librarians.

Enough, perhaps, has been said to warrant the suggestion of a little

book of colophons, bringing together what must now be laboriously hunted

up from Panzer, Hain, and similar authorities. Its principal aim should

be to collect whatever might illustrate the feelings with which the

ancient printers regarded themselves and their art in the fifteenth

century; but every colophon should also be given which throws a light on

contemporary history and public feeling on any subject. I should, for

instance, include that in which the peaceful character of Paul II.'s

pontificate is recognised by the epithet "placatissimum," and any that

conveyed a compliment to a king, doge, or any leading personage of the

time. Such a little volume, tastefully executed, something after the

pattern of Monsieur Müntz's delightful little book in the Vatican

Library under Platina, would, I believe, be a favourite companion with

many an amateur of ancient typography.

In conclusion, I may say a few words respecting what we are endeavouring

to do at the British Museum for the illustration of early printing. Of

the little exhibition of title-pages and colophons displayed at the

Association's visit to the Museum yesterday, since you have all seen it,

I need only say that the credit of collecting and arranging it is

entirely due to Mr. Pollard, whose essay on the subject I have already

recommended to your perusal. A more permanent collection is

contemplated, which I believe will be of substantial benefit to the

study of ancient printing. When the requisite funds are procured, as it

is hoped will shortly be the case, it is intended to provide additional

glazed presses in the library, with the view of bringing together

examples of every description of type used by a printer of incunabula,

that is, of books produced during the fifteenth century. Mr. Aldrich, a

gentleman deeply versed in typographic lore, to whom the selection of

these examples will be entrusted, will arrange them as far as possible

in the alphabetical order of the towns where the art of printing was

exercised, keeping the works of each printer together. This collection,

though not shown to the public, will always be accessible to experts.

Its value to them is obvious, and we hope it will also be of material

service in disclosing the numerous deficiencies of the Museum in

representative specimens of early type, and prompting efforts to make

them good. There is no idea of assembling together all the incunabula in

the Museum, which would be impracticable for many reasons, but only

representative examples of the various types. The foundation, however,

of a general catalogue of incunabula has been laid in a manner which I

have previously stated to the American Library Association, namely, by

printing copies of the catalogue on one side only. When the catalogue is

finished we shall, by merely cutting out the entries of any particular

description of books, obtain a classed catalogue of the entire subject,

among others, of our incunabula; this list can be placed in the

reading-room for general reference, and, if sufficient encouragement is

forthcoming, be reprinted and published as a distinct catalogue, revised

with the careful attention to minutiæ which would be out of place in a

general working catalogue like that of the entire library, but which may

well be expected in a speciality. The standard of accuracy has risen,

and bibliographers are dissatisfied with what many deemed excessive

nicety when the Museum rules were framed. It is improbable that I shall

have any concern with this catalogue of the future: if I had, I would

ask the Trustees' leave to dedicate it to the memory of the man to whom

we are chiefly indebted for this particular development of scientific

cataloguing—Henry Bradshaw.

FOOTNOTES:

[197:1] Read at the Annual Meeting of the Library Association, London,

October 1889.

ON THE SYSTEM OF CLASSIFYING BOOKS ON THE SHELVES FOLLOWED AT THE

BRITISH MUSEUM[210:1]

The purpose of this paper is to present a brief account of the system

followed in the classification of books on the shelves of the British

Museum library.

It will be understood that this does not amount to an enumeration of all

the subjects which might suitably be recognised as distinct in a

classified catalogue, but only of such as possess sufficient importance

to occupy at least one book-press in the library.

Subjects which from a philosophical point of view might properly be

separated, must in actual library arrangements frequently be combined

for want of room.

It is further to be borne in mind that the classification now to be

described does not in absolute strictness apply to the entire library,

but to the acquisitions—comprising, however, nearly four-fifths of the

whole—made since Sir Anthony Panizzi's accession to office as keeper of

the printed books. The books in Montague House were indeed

scientifically arranged on their removal to the new premises, but space

was then wanting to carry out the views entertained by the officer

principally entrusted with their arrangement—the late Mr. Thomas Watts,

a gentleman of prodigious memory and encyclopædic learning. Mr. Watts

subsequently obtained space more in correspondence with the

comprehensiveness of his ideas, and the Museum library will bear the

impress of his mind for all ages. With his name will be associated that

of the late keeper, Mr. Rye, for many years his coadjutor, and whose own

independent arrangement of the Grenville library and the

reference-library of the reading-room will always be cited as models for

the disposition of limited collections. I trust to be excused this brief

reference to gentlemen prematurely lost to our profession—the former by

death, the latter by indisposition, brought on, it is to be feared, by

over-application to his official duties. To the example of the former

and the instruction of the latter I am indebted for whatever claim I may

have to address you on a subject to which I can contribute little of my

own.

The classification of a great library is equivalent to a classification

of human knowledge, and may, if men please, become the standard or

symbol of conflicting schools of thought. It might, for example, be

plausibly maintained that knowledge, and therefore the library, should

begin with the definition of man's relation to the unseen powers around

him—that is, with Natural Theology. Or with man himself as the unit of

all things human—that is, with Anthropology. Or, on Nature's own

pattern, with the most rudimentary forms of existence. Hence, as we

heard yesterday from the distinguished gentleman who here represents the

fifth part of the world, the reading-room library at Melbourne begins

with works on the subject of Sponges. Fortunately for the neutral

bibliographer, there exists a book which not only holds in civilised

countries a place unique among books, but which has further established

its claim to precedence by the practical test of being the first to get

itself printed. The Museum classification accordingly begins with the

Bible, and I venture to express the opinion that every sound

classification will do the same.

When the next question emerges, how to arrange the Bible itself, we

alight at once upon a few simple principles, which, with the necessary

modifications, will prove applicable throughout. It is obvious that

entire Bibles should precede parts of Bibles; that originals should

precede translations; the more ancient originals, the more recent; and

Bibles in both the original tongues those in one only. We thus obtain

the following arrangement at starting: Polyglots, Hebrew Bibles, Greek

Bibles. It is equally apparent that Greek cannot be fitly succeeded by

any tongue but Latin; that Latin is most naturally followed by its

modern derivatives; that these draw after them the other European

languages in due order; the Slavonic forming a link with the Oriental,

which in their turn usher in the African, American, and Polynesian.

Concordances, consisting of the words of the Bible detached from their

context, form a convenient link with Commentaries. The latter fall into

two principal sections, according as they relate to Scripture in its

entirety or to some particular part. In arranging the former, the

erudite labours of scholars are, as far as possible, kept apart from the

popular illustrative literature of modern days. The order of

commentaries on separate books must, of course, correspond with that of

the books themselves in the canon of the Bible.

Next succeeds the very important class of literature representing the

Bible in contact with society through the medium of the Church. The most

obvious form of this relation is the liturgical. Liturgies accordingly

succeed Scripture in the Museum arrangement, precedence being given to

the various Churches in the order of their antiquity. A minor but very

extensive class of Liturgy, the Psalm and Hymn, naturally follows as an

appendix, preceding Private and Family Devotion, which prefaces works on

liturgical subjects in general. The next great department of this class

of literature ensues in the shape of Creeds and Catechisms. These pass

into formal expositions of dogmatic theology, including theological

libraries; which lead to the collected works of divines, commencing with

the Fathers. The same order is observed here as in the arrangement of

the Bible in its various languages: the Greek Fathers leading to the

Latin, the Latin to the divines of the nations speaking languages

derived from the Latin, and these to the Teutonic nations, a division

practically equivalent to one into Catholic and Protestant. The general

theological literature of each nation follows in the same order,

excluding works treating of special theological questions, but including

all the immense mass of printed material relating to the Reformation and

the controversies resulting from it down to the present day. With these

the subject of General Theology may be deemed concluded, and we enter

not only upon a fresh department, but upon a fresh numeration. The

book-presses embracing the subjects hitherto described all bear numbers

commencing with 3000. With the new department 4000 commences, and the

same remark, _mutatis mutandis_, is applicable to every succeeding

principal division. I must pass very lightly over the numerous sections

of this second section. Beginning with the fundamental questions of the

being of a God and the truth of Christianity, it embraces every special

question which has formed the subject of discussion among Christians, in

the order which commended itself as most logical to the original

designer of the arrangement. These controversies conduct to the common

ground of Religious Devotion and Contemplation, including the important

departments of Tracts and Religious Fiction; and these to devotion in

its hortatory form—_i.e._, Sermons, classified on the same linguistic

principle as Scripture, and divided into the great sections of collected

discourses and separate sermons. With these the subject of specifically

Christian Theology terminates, and is succeeded by the great and

growing department of Mythology and non-Christian Religion. Judaism

follows, leading by an easy transition to Church History. A few words on

the arrangement of this section will save much repetition, as the

principle here exemplified is never departed from. It demonstrates the

advantage of beginning with a subject like the Bible, respecting the

correct arrangement of which there can be no dispute, and which serves

as a norm for all the rest. As the Bible necessarily commenced with

Polyglots, so Church History begins with General Church History; the

various nations succeed in their linguistic, which is practically also

their geographical order, provision being, of course, made for the

intercalation of sub-sections where necessary, as for instance one on

English Nonconformity. Polynesia, as the last member of this

arrangement, naturally introduces the next subject—Missions—which in

turn brings on Religious Orders, including Freemasonry. Religious

Biography follows, arranged on the same principle as Religious History,

which is always carried out wherever practicable. Finally, the whole

class is concluded by the small but important division of Religious

Bibliography.

Divine Law is evidently most fitly succeeded by Human Law, or

Jurisprudence. The fulness with which the preceding section has been

treated will enable me to pass very cursorily over this and its

successors. I may be pardoned, however, one remark suggested by the

introduction of a new division—that in the classification of a library

it should be considered whether the scope of the collection is special

or general. In arranging a mere collection of Law Books it would be

proper to commence with works treating of the general principles of

Jurisprudence. In arranging a great library, regard must be had to the

harmonious connection of the parts, and accordingly the Museum

arrangement commences with Ecclesiastical Law as the natural sequel of

Theology. Bulls, Councils, Canon-Law and Modern Church-Law introduce the

great section of Roman Law. Oriental Law follows, the Laws of the

Continental Nations succeed in the order previously explained, and thus

room is only found for General Jurisprudence at a comparatively late

period, at the beginning of the numeral series 6000. It brings after it

such minor subjects as Prison-Discipline and Forensic Medicine. The

remaining space of the section is occupied by the Law of the

English-speaking nations, which requires most minute subdivision.

Next to Divinity and Law, the third rank among the pursuits of the human

mind was anciently assigned to Medicine. We have learned to recognise

that Medicine, however practically important, ranks scientifically only

as a department of Biology. The next section, accordingly, commences

with general Natural History, continuing through the natural kingdoms of

Botany, Geology, and Zoology, including Veterinary Surgery, with their

appropriate subdivisions, and then embracing Medicine—first in its

general aspect, as medical principle and practice; then in its great

leading divisions of Physiology, Pathology, Therapeutics, &c.; again, as

Special Pathology; finally, in such comparative minutiæ as professional

controversies and bills of mortality. The divisions of Art—the next

class—are simple and obvious. They may be enumerated as Archæology,

Costumes, Numismatics, Architecture, Painting, Sculpture, first as

treated collectively, and then as treated separately; and, finally,

Music. Fine Art is succeeded by Useful Art, and the interval bridged

over by Field-Sports, Games of Chance, and Games of Skill. No

subdivision of the Useful Arts has been attempted beyond the separation

of Cookery and Domestic Economy from the rest, and the addition of two

special sections, one for the catalogues of industrial exhibitions, the

other for the voluminous and important publications of the South

Kensington Museum.

The extensive and miscellaneous division which succeeds may, perhaps,

best be defined under the head of Philosophy, alike in its scientific

principles and in its application to human life. Commencing with

Political Philosophy, or the Science of Government, it runs rapidly

through the politics of the various nations, in the geographical order

previously detailed, passes into Political Economy, with the allied

subjects of Finance, Commerce, and Social Science; thence into

Education, and, by the minor morals so intimately allied with the latter

subject, into Ethics, including works on the condition of Woman, Peace,

Temperance, and similar topics. Speculative Philosophy succeeds,

introducing Mathematics, on which hangs the great department of Applied

Mathematics, including all physical sciences except the biological. The

various branches are carefully discriminated, and room is found among

them for the so-called Occult Sciences, and for Military and Naval

matters, the series appropriately concluding with Chemistry, or the

science which aims at the resolution of all matter into its original

elements. The remaining sections, though most important and extensive,

are very simple in arrangement, and may be dismissed very briefly. They

are: History; Geography, with Voyages and Topography; Biography; Poetry

and the Drama; Belles Lettres, including Fiction; and Philology. The

arrangement is invariably the same: collected works on each subject

being placed first, and a geographical order being adopted for the rest

when the conditions of the case allow. Genealogy is regarded as an

appendix to History; Letters to Biography; Elocution, with Literary

Criticism and Bibliography, to Poetry and the Dramatic Art. The class of

Belles Lettres is headed by Libraries and Cyclopædias.

It should be stated that the system here explained refers in the

strictest sense only to works complete in themselves, and not to

Periodicals, Academical Publications, and State Papers, which are placed

separately. Although, however, these constitute distinct series, the

principle of classification is practically identical. The same remarks

apply to the Oriental departments of the collection, the Grenville

library, and the reference-library of the reading-room.

Essays in Librarianship and Bibliography · 第 13 / 21 段