CHAPTER XII

THE PREVESA CAMPAIGN; THE GATHERING OF THE FLEETS

Some thirty-five miles to the south-eastward of Cape Bianco (the

southernmost point of the island of Corfu) lies Prevesa, at the

entrance of the Gulf of Arta, or, as it was known in classic times,

the Ambracian Gulf. In these seas, in the year 31 B.C., was fought

one of the most memorable battles of antiquity, for it was here that

Octavius, afterward Augustus Cæsar, defeated the forces of Antony and

Cleopatra. There have been many controversies of late years as to

whom the original idea of breaking the line in naval combats is due:

anyhow, it can claim a respectable antiquity, as it was practised at

the battle of Actium by Octavius, who by a skilful manoeuvre caused

Antony to lengthen his line, which he then cut through and attacked the

ships of Cleopatra, which were in support: this was too much for the

lady, who fled with her sixty ships, followed by Antony, to his eternal

disgrace. The remainder of his fleet fought bravely for a time, but

was eventually defeated, the land army also surrendering to Octavius.

The date of the actual battle of Actium was September 2nd, 31 B.C.:

it was in September 1538 that the battle of Prevesa between Andrea

Doria and Kheyr-ed-Din Barbarossa took place, and the conditions of the

battle were almost exactly similar.

To this very place came, 1569 years later, the Christian and the

Moslem, the Crescent and the Cross, each under its most renowned

leader, each side burning with an inextinguishable hate. It was one of

the peculiarities of this warfare that into it entered so much actual

personal feeling, each side hating the other for the love of God in

the most poisonous fashion. Save and except the battle of Lepanto in

1571 (with which we shall deal later in the story of Ali Basha, or

Occhiali as he was called by his Christian opponents) the contest

at Prevesa was far the most important ever fought by those strange

oar-propelled vessels known as galleys. It was memorable in many ways,

but particularly so for the ages of the men in chief command. Andrea

Doria was at this time seventy years of age; in fact, Guglielmotti

gives the date of his birth as 1466, thus making him two years older.

That amazing veteran Kheyr-ed-Din Barbarossa, who died in his bed at

Constantinople on July 4th, 1546, at the age of ninety, must have been

eighty-two. Vicenzo Capello was sixty-eight, as the epitaph on his

tomb at Venice in the church of Santa Maria Formosa says that he was

seventy-two in the year of his death, 1542.

Once again Christendom was nerving itself for a supreme effort against

the corsairs, and, during the time that Barbarossa was raiding and

ravaging among the islands of the Archipelago, the Christian fleet

was gradually assembling. At first it numbered some 150 galleys,

81 Venetian, 36 Pontifical, and 30 Spanish; Charles V. sent, at the

last moment, 50 ships on which were embarked 10,000 troops. The force

totalled altogether 59,000 to 60,000 men, 195 ships, and 2,594 cannons.

This was no doubt a most formidable armada, but the policy of those

by whom it was composed was not all directed to the same end. While

Charles desired, above all things, to exterminate the corsairs for

good and all, which was, in the circumstances, the only sound view

of the matter, the Venetians were for fighting defensive actions to

maintain their supremacy in the Ionian Islands, and were disposed to

let the future take care of itself. There was not, in consequence, that

absolute unanimity among the various commanders of the expedition as

was necessary for its complete success.

The concentration of the Christian fleet took place at Corfu. The

Venetians arrived first, with Vincenzo Capello in command; Marco

Grimani brought thither the Papal contingent; they anchored and waited,

but Andrea Doria did not appear. Days lengthened into weeks, and

Grimani and Capelli chafed and fumed; provisions were running low and

the dignity of Venice and of the Pope were flouted by this strange

remissness on the part of the Admiral of the Emperor. At last, furious

with impatience, Grimani made a raid into the Gulf of Arta, which was

defended at the entrance by the fortress of Prevesa. The only result

of this ill-timed attack was that two Papal captains and a number of

soldiers were killed. Grimani then returned to Corfu, to find Capello

irritated to the last extent by the non-appearance of Doria.

At last, on September 5th, the Imperial fleet hove in sight. It was

composed of forty-nine galleys, but these were supplemented by a great

number of sailing ships; the sailing craft, however, did not arrive

till September 22nd. These vessels were gradually making way among the

Spaniards since the discovery of the new world.

At this time the Venetians possessed fourteen nefs. Doria had augmented

these by twenty-two of his own, and the total number of thirty-six

was commanded by Franco Doria, a nephew of the admiral. The Venetian

nefs were commanded by Alessandro Condalmiero, captain of the _Galleon

of Venice_. This was the most formidable fighting vessel in the

Mediterranean; she was reckoned an excellent sailor, she was by far the

most heavily armed sailing ship then afloat; in fact, in the opinion of

contemporary seamen, she was “an invincible fortress.”

Doria, Grimani, and Capello had now nearly 200 ships carrying nearly

60,000 men. Such a force, in all ages, has been considered great.

William the Conqueror conquered Britain with a less number; it is

almost half the total of the personnel of the British fleet in the

present day which has to defend a country with 40,000,000 inhabitants,

and all this force had been raised, armed, and equipped to combat with

a Moslem corsair.

Barbarossa had succeeded in assembling 122 ships. He was accompanied

by all the most famous corsairs of the day, among whom was Dragut,

who fell at the siege of Malta, and of whom we shall have more to say

in due time. Far and wide ranged the swift galleys of the Ottoman

fleet, for the plan of the commander of the Moslems was to locate and

destroy his enemies in detail if possible. At last news came to him

that Grimani’s ships had been sighted in the Gulf of Arta. Not one

moment did he lose; he would fall upon the Papal contingent with his

whole force and destroy it utterly. Such, at least, was his plan when

he sailed for Prevesa; but, notwithstanding his haste, he was too late.

Happily for himself, Grimani had returned to Corfu before the arrival

of his enemy.

At this juncture Barbarossa hesitated; had he not done so, and had

he followed Grimani to Corfu, he might have destroyed both him

and Vincenzo Capello in detail before the arrival of Doria. The

Prevesa campaign is a curious study of hesitation on both sides, and

the idea naturally occurs were not the corsair and the Christian

commanders-in-chief too old for the work on which they were engaged?

Men of over seventy are not impetuous, but grave and deliberate as

a rule; but there is no rule without its exceptions, and Doria and

Barbarossa were not as other leaders. Up to the present their dash and

initiative had been unimpaired. There was no question that Barbarossa

not only made a mistake in hesitating, but that by it he lost the

game. Instead of striking at once he did what he had never done before

in the whole of his career, which was to send to Constantinople for

instructions. Some of his galleys had captured a fishing-boat off

Corfu, the crew of which had seen Doria’s fleet. The Moslem leader

sent the fishermen themselves to report to Soliman exactly what they

had seen, and to ask for and bring back instructions from that

potentate. What Barbarossa had discovered was that the odds were very

much against him; so much, in fact, that he would have to act on the

defensive. In consequence, he steered for Prevesa and entered the Gulf

of Arta, which is approached by a long narrow strait, dominated by

the castle of Prevesa. Once inside he anchored his galleys in such a

position that they could fire direct out to sea, thus overwhelming with

their fire any vessel attempting to enter.

Barbarossa now occupied the same position as did Octavius in his

combat with Antony. The rôle of the latter general was now taken by

Doria. Antony, like Doria, had heavy ships which could not advance

to the attack owing to their too great draught. Octavius, with his

light-draught ships, could both attack and retreat into safety if

overmatched.

On September 22nd Doria, having collected all his ships, gave orders

to fill up with wood, water, and fresh provisions. On the 25th, to

the sound of the trumpet, the Commander-in-Chief, with his fleet of

two hundred sail, weighed anchor and sped before the wind rapidly

southwards. Grimani commanded the advance-guard, Doria was in the

centre, Vincenzo Capello, with his Venetians, brought up the rear.

Formed in two columns, the nefs followed the galleys; the _Galleon of

Venice_, commanded by Condalmiero, a squadron in herself, preceded them.

[Illustration: GALEASSE UNDER SAIL.]

From the anchorage at Corfu to the entrance of the Gulf of Arta is

about fifty-eight miles, and, traversing this distance during the hours

of daylight, the fleet anchored, as night fell, under Cape Prevesa.

The Galleon which acted as what we should now call the guide of the

fleet, anchored in sixteen feet of water, which was barely sufficient

to keep her afloat.

The Gulf of Arta, in which, as we have said, the fleet of the Moslems

were now anchored, presents very curious physical peculiarities: it

is twenty-two miles in length from east to west, and fifteen miles in

breadth from north to south. This sheet of water is formed into an

immense bay by the configuration of the land, and its depth, in places,

is from one hundred and thirty to two hundred feet. Inside it all the

navies in the world might ride at anchor, were it not for the fact that

the entrance is closed by a bar upon which the depth varies from six

and a half to thirteen feet. With his light-draught ships Barbarossa

occupied the interior position, while the heavy ships of Doria must in

any event remain outside. A strong sea-breeze was blowing on shore;

all night the nefs and the galleys were nearly rolling their gunwales

under. In these packed and crowded vessels the misery and discomfort of

their crews may be imagined. On the morning of the 26th, however, the

west wind dropped, and a light wind sprang up from the northward.

The position at this time was one of surpassing interest. Here at long

last the two most renowned sea-captains of the time were face to face.

Each was aware that his antagonist was worthy of his steel, also that

great issues, political and national, hung upon this conflict; which

was no mere affair of outposts, but a struggle to the death as to

whether the Crescent or the Cross was in time to come to be supreme

in the tideless sea. And yet—such is the irony of fate—this battle

proved indecisive, and it was not until thirty years later, at the

battle of Lepanto, that this momentous question was set at rest for a

time.

Would Doria, greatly daring, go in and risk all in attacking a

fortified position; or would Barbarossa make a sally and fight it out

to the death on the element on which he was so supremely at home?

But Doria had no mind to attack a fleet anchored under the guns of

a fortress; Barbarossa would not risk all in an encounter with a

foe possessed of great numerical superiority without orders from

Constantinople. On Doria’s side nothing but a disembarkation and a

land-attack would offer a fair security for success, Kheyr-ed-Din,

who held, as we have said, the interior position, was well aware of

this fact, and in this supreme moment of his career was not disposed

to give away any advantage. The situation occupied by Kheyr-ed-Din

at the battle of Prevesa was, in a sense, different from any which

he had held before, as he was in this case hampered by his sense of

responsibility as Admiralissimo to the Grand Turk. What happened on the

distant shores of Africa mattered but little to that monarch, and he

had been content to allow his admiral an entirely free hand; here in

Europe, on the shores of Greece, so close relatively to his own capital

city, it was a very different matter, and Soliman was kept in touch

with the happenings of his fleet as far as was possible in those days.

But if the great corsair did not add to his reputation in this eventful

campaign he still displayed an aptitude in realising the situation

which, it is safe to say, was shown by none of those under his

command.

Prevesa illustrates for us more than any other action the difficulties

with which the path of the partisan leader in these days must always

have been filled; and how it was that personal ascendancy was the only

force to which such a leader had to trust Sheer dominance of the minds,

the wills, and the bodies of others had placed Kheyr-ed-Din where he

was; all his life he had commanded undisciplined pirates, and yet now,

when he was the properly accredited officer of a mighty monarch, when

he might have expected far more discipline and subordination than had

ever been his lot in the past, he was met with a contumaciousness which

he was unable to quell, and was forced into taking steps which, in his

own unequalled knowledge of war, he knew to be doomed to disaster.

Around him the Reis, or captains of the Moslem galleys, clamorously

demanded that he should take precautions against a land-attack. It

was true that the raid which had been made by Grimani had been easily

repulsed, but in present circumstances there was no question of a mere

raid, as, should the Christian admiral so decide, he could land twenty

thousand men. Sinan Reis, an old Osmanli warrior, furious with jealousy

that the chief command should be in the hands of a corsair, sustained

his opinion in a manner which augured ill for the hearty co-operation

of all the Turkish forces. Sinan was just one of those blindly valiant

fighters from whom the politic Ibrahim had desired to deliver his

master when he had urged the appointment of Kheyr-ed-Din: brave as

a lion, keen as the edge of his own good scimitar, fanatical, as

became a Hodja who had visited the Holy Places, Sinan was a type of

the Turkish sea-officer: devoid of strategical instinct and tactical

training, his one idea was a headlong attack, then victory or the

houris of Paradise. It will be seen that Barbarossa had not only Doria

and the Christian fleet and army against which to contend on this

occasion.

The peril conjured up by Sinan Reis on this occasion was not altogether

an imaginary one: the idea of a disembarkation had, in point of fact,

been seriously discussed that very morning by Andrea Doria and his

council of war, at which Hernando de Gonzaga, Generalissimo of the

troops embarked, had advised a landing. His argument, embodied in a

long and technical harangue, may be reduced to the following:

“If we cannot go straight at the enemy and force our way

through the entrance under his cannon why should we not

reduce the fortress of Prevesa by a siege? Once masters

of this height, we could close the strait by sinking

in it vessels laden with stones, and we then have the

Ottoman fleet at our mercy.”

But Doria the sailor was not to be led by Gonzaga the soldier. He said:

“The advice seems sound, but in reality it would prove

most dangerous if followed. Barbarossa must have

landed some of his men, the cavalry which defeated

Grimani’s raid will no doubt come again from the

interior, if necessary. If we deprive our ships of their

soldiers we expose ourselves to a sea-fight under most

disadvantageous conditions. But most, important of

all is the fact that time presses; the season is far

advanced; at any time the fleet may be driven off these

shores by a storm, in which case what would become of

the troops left on shore? Again, if it comes on to blow

a tempest from the westward we may lose not only our

troops, but our ships, in fact the whole expedition.”

At the battle of Actium, Octavius occupied the shore upon which

Hernando Gonzaga wished to land and assault; but notwithstanding this

fact Octavius did not attempt the passage of the gulf but waited for

his enemy outside. Doria was therefore all the more justified in not

sacrificing ships and men in attempting to force an entrance now

that this same shore was in the hands of the enemy. He was asked, he

said, to thrust his head into the mouth of the wolf, and this he was

determined not to do.

In the meanwhile Barbarossa was using much the same language to his

captains as was Doria.

“My brothers,” said he, “you wish to transport cannon and raise

redoubts on this uncovered shore because you think that the Christians

will disembark and seize it: if you attempt this I tell you that the

guns of the enemy will annoy you terribly., Not only this, supposing

that Doria, profiting by the moment that our vessels are empty of

troops, should attack in force, we cannot with five thousand men

repulse twenty thousand. The fort of Prevesa will defend itself quite

sufficiently well with its own garrison; our business is to think

of the fleet and not to weaken in any way our means of attack and

defence, If the infidels force, or attempt to force, an entry into

the port, they will be most likely merely losing time and ammunition

in cannonading us. You know that it is principally in this that these

accursed dogs do trust, whereas we, O men of Islam, will place our

confidence in God, in Mahomet his Prophet, in the strength of our right

arms, in the keenness of our scimitars; we will carry them by boarding,

therefore we must keep our crews on board,”

But Barbarossa had not that absolute domination of the forces under

his command which should be the prescriptive right of any leader.

Sinan-Reis, the implacable be-turbaned old Osmanli, held him in bitter

scorn. “Your advice may be good,” he retorted, “but we think our plan

the better.”

The admiral suggested a reconnaissance of the site, which was merely

a ruse to gain time. This was carried out under his own supervision,

and confirmed him in the idea that disembarkation was folly; but

Sinan-Reis and the Janissaries held obstinately to their opinion, while

the “Joldaks,” or Turkish soldiers in the galleys, grumbled among

themselves that Kheyr-ed-Din must indeed be full of vanity to reject

the counsels of one like Sinan-Reis.

Both commanders-in-chief, Christian and Moslem, seem on this occasion

to have taken an absolutely correct view of the problem as it was

presented; but whereas Andrea Doria was a real commander-in-chief,

Barbarossa was forced to consider and to defer to the opinions of men

whom he knew to be in the wrong.

It was against his better judgment that Kheyr-ed-Din at last

yielded; the men were backing up their officers, a spirit of

disaffection was abroad in the armada: such a thing as this a wise

chief must gauge at its true value, and stop before it goes too far.

The Osmanli were murmuring against “the corsair”; it was time to let

them see whether they or their war-worn leader possessed the greater

wisdom.

According to Moslem chroniclers the valour of Kheyr-ed-Din was only

equalled by his piety; consequently he murmured a prayer into that

famous beard of his, which was now so much nearer to white than red,

and gave orders that the cannon shall be immediately disembarked. “Let

the will of God and of His Prophet be accomplished; that which is

written is that which will take place,” exclaimed this pious man as he

watched the preparations being carried out under the supervision of

Mourad-Reis.

That which “took place” was precisely and exactly what the

Commander-in-Chief had predicted from the first: no sooner had

Mourad-Reis landed upon the exposed beach, and attempted to open a

trench, than he was met by a furious and concentrated fire from the

galleys and nefs of the Christian fleet. To entrench themselves was

impossible in the circumstances, as they had been told by the Admiral

before they started on this harebrained adventure. There could be

only one result, which was that, after a cruel and perfectly useless

slaughter, the soldiers of Mourad-Reis had to retreat before the hail

of shot poured upon them, and to return ignominiously to their vessels.

It is not on record what Kheyr-ed-Din said to Sinan, Mourad, and

those other tacticians who had recommended the landing; which perhaps

is a pity.

Doria then made a tentative movement against the strait by a detachment

of galleys; Barbarossa told off an equal number to oppose them, and

they mutually cannonaded and skirmished during the day. There was much

noise and excitement, but practically no advantage was gained by either

side, as Doria’s men could not risk passing the guns of the fort, nor

could those of Barbarossa the chance of being cannonaded by the heavy

vessels lying in wait-for them outside. And so the day closed down with

no success on either side, but with a decisive demonstration to the

Moslems that, if they desired victory, to their admiral had better be

left the organisation by which it was to be obtained.

Whether Doria really desired a pitched battle can never be known; that

which is certain is that, during the whole time the fleets were in

touch, all his dispositions make it appear there was nothing of which

he was so much afraid. And yet it was the opportunity of his life; he

had superiority in numbers, he had valiant and experienced leaders,

and sixty thousand men thirsting for battle, under his command. Also

he had his opportunity, which, had he seized upon, must have ended

in victory, did those who were under his orders only fight as he had

every reason to believe that they would. As it was, he threw away

the gift of fortune, and left to the Osmanli the practical dominance

of the Mediterranean Sea until that great day in 1571 when Don John

of Austria, the natural son of Charles V., proved to the world at

Lepanto that the Turk was not invincible upon the waters.

It is true that Doria was awkwardly situated; Kheyr-ed-Din held the

interior position, and that leader was a great believer in the adage

that “if Brag is a good dog, Holdfast is a better.” He was well aware

of his numerical inferiority, and in consequence refused to listen

to the frenzied appeals of the excited Moslems to be led against the

Christian dogs. It may seem a contradiction in terms to speak of the

moral courage of a pirate; but if ever that quality were displayed

to its fullest extent it was exhibited by Barbarossa in the Prevesa

campaign. In his intellectual outlook on all that was passing, both

inside and outside of the Gulf of Arta, in this September of 1538, we

see Kheyr-ed-Din at his best. Ever a fighter, he knew when to give

battle and when to refrain, when to sweep headlong upon the foe, but

also when to hold back and to baffle by waiting till the psychological

moment should arrive. Around him Sinan-Reis, Mourad-Reis, and half a

hundred others of their kidney were clamouring; they hurled insults at

his head, they heaped opprobrium on “the corsair,” they practically

incited their troops to mutiny in their mad appeals to be led against

the foe.

But “the corsair” kept his head, and kept his temper, and saved the

Ottoman fleet for his master from his great rival, Doria. That noble

Genoese seaman was for once in his life “letting I dare not wait upon I

would”; he would not order the attack for which his men were waiting,

and no provocation, apparently, could tempt Barbarossa to play

Antony to the Octavius of Doria; the Christian admiral was tempting

Providence at that advanced season of the year in keeping the sea on an

hostile coast on which at any time he might be driven by a tempest. His

old and experienced antagonist was well aware that the winds and the

waves might save him the trouble of destroying the fleet of the enemy;

an equinoctial gale would do that far more effectually than could he.

If Doria had an uneasy consciousness that he might at any time see the

shore littered with oarless galleys and dismasted nefs, while the sea

was filled with drowning men, the same vision had been vouchsafed to

his imperturbable adversary. Had it been left to the entire initiative

of Barbarossa, his Fabian tactics would assuredly have prevailed in

the end; but as it was he was surrounded by a clamouring host of men,

soldiers by trade, who, understanding nothing of the happenings of the

sea, merely derided as cowardice any postponement of what they regarded

as the inevitable battle. The admiral of the Sultan held out as long as

it was possible, but at last, owing to a new factor in the case, was

forced, against his better judgment, to offer the battle which it was

in his power to have withheld.

Sea-Wolves of the Mediterranean: The grand period of the Moslem corsairs · 第 12 / 22 章