John Howard Payne was born in 33 Broad Street, New York, on the 9th

of June 1791; and a large portion of his childhood was passed amidst

the peaceful verdant scenery of East Hampton, in that State, where his

father was principal of a small academy. When John was five years old,

his father moved to Boston in a similar scholastic capacity, and there

remained eight years; after which, the subject of this memoir returned

to New York, and entered the counting-house of a firm in which an

elder brother had been partner. But he never took to the dull drudgery

of a mercantile life. When only thirteen years old, he contributed a

dramatic criticism to a juvenile paper of which he was editor, and it

was republished in the columns of the _New York Evening Post_. Soon

after this he entered Union College, but only remained a year; after

which, owing to the pecuniary difficulties of his father, he found

himself under the necessity of pushing his fortune in the world alone

and unaided.

Payne now devoted his time to studying for the stage, for which he

displayed considerable aptitude; and made his first public appearance

at the Park Theatre, New York, as Young Norval in the tragedy of

_Douglas_. This _début_ was a complete success. From New York he

went to Boston, where he again appeared as Young Norval, and also as

Romeo, Rolla, and other characters. In cultured Boston, he became

even more the rage than in the great emporium of commerce. After

a time he returned to New York, thence he visited Baltimore—where

he was enthusiastically received; subsequently proceeding to South

Carolina and other Southern States. He came to Washington in 1809, and

attracted great attention, one admiring critic declaring that ‘a more

extraordinary mixture of softness and intelligence was never associated

in a human countenance; and his face was an index of his heart—he was

a perfect Cupid in beauty.’ In January 1813, Payne sailed for England,

and in Liverpool was welcomed by William Roscoe, who presented him

to John Kemble, Coleridge, Campbell, Southey, Byron, and others; and

got for him an engagement at Drury Lane Theatre, in the character of

Young Norval. Great applause greeted the youthful American actor,

particularly in the death-scene at the end of the play.

Payne performed for a month in London, and then went the round of

several of the principal English cities, after which he proceeded to

Dublin, where, in conjunction with the celebrated Miss O’Neil, he

played in various well-known dramas. He now visited Paris, where he

met and became intimate with his distinguished countryman, Washington

Irving; and formed a friendship with Talma, the French tragedian. Once

more he returned to England; but on this occasion he was less of a

novelty, and did not retain his former success.

About this time he commenced his career as a dramatic author, one of

his first efforts in this line being the tragedy of _Brutus_, produced

at Drury Lane Theatre in 1818, the famous Edmund Kean taking the

principal part. The play was a success, being performed to crowded

houses for seventy-five nights. Upwards of fifty plays of various

descriptions were written by Payne, and their pecuniary returns

enabled him to live comfortably during his nineteen years’ residence

in Europe. But the production which has achieved such a world-wide

fame, and rendered its author an honoured name in many a household,

was his _Home! Sweet Home!_ This beautiful song was composed in Paris

one dull October day when Payne was living in humble lodgings near the

Palais-Royal. The depressing influences of his surroundings, something

in the atmosphere which seemed to harmonise with his own feelings, and

his solitary lot in life, were instrumental in drawing forth the simple

pathos and tender yearnings of the song. As originally composed, it

ran, according to some accounts, as follows:

’Mid pleasures and palaces though we may roam,

Be it ever so humble, there’s no place like home;

A charm from the skies seems to hallow us there

(Like the love of a mother

Surpassing all other),

Which, seek through the world, is ne’er met with elsewhere.

There’s a spell in the shade

Where our infancy played

Even stronger than time, and more deep than despair.

An exile from home, splendour dazzles in vain:

Oh! give me my lowly thatched cottage again;

The birds and the lambkins that came at my call;

Those who named me with pride,

Those who played by my side,

Give me them! with the innocence dearer than all.

The joys of the palaces through which I roam,

Only swell my heart’s anguish—there’s no place like home.

The _Boston Congregationalist_, however, has given the following as

the authentic form in which the author sent out his immortal song—the

original manuscript being in the possession of an old lady in America,

to whom at one time John Howard Payne was greatly attached:

’Mid pleasures and palaces though we may roam,

Be it ever so humble, there’s no place like home;

A charm from the skies seems to hallow us there,

Which, seek through the world, is ne’er met with elsewhere.

Home! home! sweet, sweet home!

There’s no place like home, there’s no place like home.

An exile from home, splendour dazzles in vain:

Oh! give me my lowly thatched cottage again;

The birds singing gaily, that come at my call;

Give me them with the peace of mind, dearer than all.

Home! home! &c.

How sweet, too, to sit ’neath a fond father’s smile,

And the cares of a mother to soothe and beguile.

Let others delight ’mid new pleasures to roam,

But give me, oh! give me the pleasures of home.

Home! home! &c.

To thee, I’ll return, overburdened with care;

The heart’s dearest solace will smile on me there;

No more from that cottage again will I roam,

Be it ever so humble, there’s no place like home.

Home! home! &c.

The song was afterwards rewritten by its author, and introduced into an

opera called _Clari, the Maid of Milan_, a play sold by him, in 1823,

to Charles Kemble, of Covent Garden Theatre, for two hundred and fifty

pounds; the music being composed by Sir Henry Bishop. In the opera, the

song ran as we now know it:

’Mid pleasures and palaces though we may roam,

Be it ever so humble, there’s no place like home;

A charm from the sky seems to hallow us there,

Which, seek through the world, is ne’er met with elsewhere.

Home! home! sweet, sweet home!

There’s no place like home, there’s no place like home.

An exile from home, splendour dazzles in vain:

Oh! give me my lowly thatched cottage again;

The birds singing gaily, that came at my call;

Give me them—and the peace of mind, dearer than all.

Home! home! sweet, sweet home!

There’s no place like home, there’s no place like home.

_Clari_ had a great run, the chief _rôle_ being taken by Miss Maria

Tree, whose singing of the simple song caused a wonderful sensation,

gifted as she was not only with a beautiful and expressive face, but

with a fine voice which thrilled her hearers. More than one hundred

thousand copies of the song as set to music were sold by the publishers

within a year of its publication; but poor Payne reaped no pecuniary

benefit from this source, nor did even his name appear as the author.

A story is told by the American newspapers that the power of the song

once liberated its author from captivity. John Howard Payne was a warm

personal friend of John Ross, the famous Cherokee Indian chief, and

they were together when the Cherokees were ordered to remove from their

home in Georgia to the prairie-lands west of the Mississippi River.

Many refused to go; so the militia were ordered to scour the country

and arrest all who stayed behind. Payne and Ross were seated before the

fire in a miserable log-cabin, when seven or eight militiamen burst

in, secured their prisoners, mounted them on horses, and led them

away. As they left the hovel, rain began to fall, and continued all

night, so that every man was thoroughly drenched. Towards midnight,

one of Payne’s escort, to keep himself awake, began humming ‘Home!

home! sweet, sweet home!’ and Payne said: ‘I never expected to hear

that song under such circumstances and at such a time. Do you know the

author?’—‘No!’ said the soldier. ‘Do you?’—‘Yes,’ answered Payne; ‘I

am.’—‘Ho! ho!’ laughed the soldier. ‘You composed it, did you? Oh! tell

the horse that! Look here. If you composed it—but I know you didn’t—you

can say it all without stopping. It says something about pleasures and

palaces, and cottages and birds. Now, pitch into it, and reel it off;

and if you can’t, you’ll have to walk.’ Payne ‘pitched’ into it, and

‘reeled it off’ greatly to the satisfaction of his guardian, who vowed

the composer of such a song should never go to prison if he could help

it. When the party reached Milledgeville, the headquarters, they were,

after a preliminary examination, and much to their agreeable surprise,

discharged.

In the summer of 1832, Mr Payne returned to New York at a time when

cholera was desolating the city, and was joyfully received by his many

friends, a complimentary benefit being arranged for him at the Park

Theatre, where he first made his bow as an actor. For the next ten

years he resided in America, during which he engaged in a considerable

amount of literary work, and travelled extensively both in the North

and South, until in 1842 he was appointed to the post of American

consul at Tunis. However, he was not permitted very long to enjoy his

new post, for in less than three years he was recalled by President

Polk, who, to gratify a political associate, gave the appointment to

another.

This was a great disappointment to Payne, who had ably fulfilled his

duties, and was engaged in writing a history of Tunis, which he had now

to abandon; but to console himself, he made a tour in the continent,

visiting Italy, France, and other places, returning to Washington in

1847. During this, his last sojourn in the capital, he gathered around

him an extensive circle of friends, and kept up a correspondence with

many of those eminent in literature and art, whose acquaintance he had

formed both in his own country and in Europe. The exertions of those

who knew his worth, and the claims he had upon his country, were at

last successful, and Mr Payne was again appointed to the post he had

before filled, being re-installed as consul at Tunis.

In May 1851, the author of _Home! Sweet Home!_ bade farewell to his

country for the last time, and in a few weeks afterwards entered upon

the duties of his office at Tunis, with high hopes of continuing his

former career of usefulness. But it had been otherwise decreed, for

ere another year had passed, John Howard Payne had ceased from his

wanderings, while his country had to lament the loss of one of her

gifted sons. He died on the 9th of April 1852, and his body was laid in

the Protestant cemetery of St George at Tunis, the grave being covered

by a white marble slab, with a simple epitaph, and on the four edges

of the marble the four lines—a line to each:

Sure, when thy gentle spirit fled

To realms beyond the azure dome,

With arms outstretched, God’s angels said:

‘Welcome to Heaven’s Home! sweet Home!’

After lying more than thirty years in a foreign tomb, the last remains

of John Howard Payne have now been transferred to a grave in his native

land. To Mr W. Corcoran, a well-known and philanthropical citizen of

Washington, is due the initiation of the scheme and the credit of

defraying all the expenses connected with the bringing home of the

remains of his countryman from Tunis, after the necessary permission

had been obtained from the Secretary of State. Payne’s grave in the

cemetery at Tunis had been well kept, and, besides the marble slab

above mentioned, was indicated by a large pepper-tree which had been

planted by one of his friends who was present at his death and burial.

Two of the small company who witnessed the interment of the poet, M.

Pisani and an old Arab dragoman who was deeply attached to Mr Payne,

were present at the exhumation of his body. The coffin was found to be

much decayed, and little more than the skeleton, and some portions of

the uniform in which the lonely exile had been buried, rewarded the

reverential care with which the sad duty was performed. After being

inclosed in a leaden and two outer wooden coffins, the honoured remains

were deposited in the small Protestant church until the vessel which

was to transport them to Marseilles was ready to sail. As the body was

being carried into the church, the poet’s own immortal song was sweetly

sung by an American lady who was present, with a pathos which deeply

affected the little gathering of friends and mourners—an appropriate

_requiem_ to the kindly and gentle spirit whose cherished dust was once

more to be borne back to his native land. On the 9th of June 1883, the

remains were laid in their last resting-place in the Oak Hill Cemetery,

Washington; and of all the monuments to distinguished men in that

distinguished city, none surely will attract more visitors than that

erected to the memory of the author of _Home! Sweet Home!_

COMMON COLDS.

It is impossible, with the prevalence of damp, fogs, and frost, to

keep entirely free from colds. It is easy to say: Avoid all exposure

to their causes; don’t go out in wet weather; don’t sleep in damp

bedclothes; and don’t get overheated by exercise. The majority of

people, both old and young, are obliged to go out, and occasionally to

do risky things, however much they may wish to avoid the unpleasantness

of a cold. So colds are ‘caught,’ as the saying goes, and people find

a difficulty in getting rid of them. Those who have coddled themselves

before its arrival, do not derive much benefit from an extra coddling;

and those who do not care to take precautions, allow the cold to run

its course, rather than make a fuss over it.

To both, perhaps, an explanation of what a cold really is may be

useful, not only for prevention, but for cure. The cause is simply

this: The skin, with its myriads of perspiration pores, becomes

contracted by long exposure to damp or cold, and thereby prevents the

secretion which is necessary to health being carried off in the natural

manner. The amount of insensible perspiration in a healthy person

daily is about two pints. Thus, when it cannot pass off through the

outer skin, it is diverted inwardly upon the mucous surfaces of the

body, and the first symptoms of a cold in the head set in. There is

a tightness in the nose and forehead, sneezing, and watering at the

eyes, and a redness in the interior of the nose, from excess of blood.

After a day or two, a thin running from the nose sets in, and the salts

in it, which should pass off by the skin, make the upper lip red and

sore. The question is, therefore, knowing the nature of a cold, what

is the best way to restore the natural action of the skin, and get

rid of its substitute as soon as possible? Many ways are recommended.

A Dover’s powder—which consists of ipecacuanha and opium—is without

doubt one of the best remedies at the commencement, for if taken at

night with a good basin of gruel or tumbler of negus, it sets up a

strong perspiration, and the skin, forced into action, may thus regain

its tone. However, this is not always successful, unless the sufferer

can remain indoors for a few days, and keep a room at an equable

temperature of about sixty-five degrees Fahrenheit. Another good

remedy—if the patient’s constitution admits of it—is a Turkish bath,

where, after an hour in a heat of one hundred and thirty to one hundred

and fifty degrees, the tepid douche should be used instead of the cold,

because the object in view is not only to open the sweat-pores for a

time, but to keep them properly relaxed. Cold water would of course

cause them to contract. Perhaps the best, and one of the easiest, is to

abstain as much as possible from liquids. By this means the supply of

fluid which goes to keep up the running cold is cut off, and with it

the discharge. If persevered in for a day, this remedy may completely

cure a slight cold, and keep a bad one very much under.

Colds are either pooh-poohed or made much of. Too much care, however,

cannot be taken to prevent a cold getting worse and gaining a hold.

People of the most robust constitutions have succumbed to them; and

apart from the inconvenience and waste of time which they entail,

there is always the probability of more serious symptoms manifesting

themselves. The air-tubes may become congested, and a bad cough result

before they are relieved; or the person may have become debilitated

by the head-cold, and, unable to resist the further progress of its

effect, may be victimised by inflammation of the lungs, bronchitis, or

serious congestion of the lungs. The most sensible plan, in so variable

a climate as ours, is in the first place to harden one’s self as much

as possible by not being too much afraid of cold when one is perfectly

well; and next, when a cold, however slight, has been caught, to do

one’s hardest to get rid of it by one of the above-mentioned remedies.

Damp as a cause of cold is very hard to avoid. We all know that wet

feet or damp clothes are injurious; but we cannot always provide for

emergencies. A traveller may suddenly find that he is put into a

damp bed, and has no alternative but to sleep there. Now, hydropathy

has taught us that people do not necessarily catch cold from sleeping

in wet or damp things, provided a sufficient amount of dry clothing

is put over that which is wet, to prevent any chilliness being felt.

This, then, is a safe principle to act upon; and a traveller thrown

into such awkward circumstances, may make the best of a bad job, and

sleep with impunity in his damp bed, provided he puts all available

coverings on the outside, and so insures a tolerable amount of warmth

and comfort; at the same time he ought to lay aside the sheets and

sleep in the blankets. It is easier to guard against damp feet; for

with woollen socks—which are the best non-conductors of heat, and the

least liable to retain perspiration—and a pair of cork soles placed in

good strong boots, no fear need be entertained of moisture affecting

the skin. In rain or snow, no doubt the moisture may penetrate through

the upper leather. The best precaution against this is to rub them with

vaseline, or oil, or melted fat, before setting out. Damp feet are the

most prominent causes of colds and chilblains amongst children. Those,

therefore, who have to go to and from school in all weathers, should

not only have cork soles inside their boots and the outer surface well

greased, but should take warm slippers to school with them to change.

If every schoolmistress could only be induced to make this change a

rule with every pupil, there would be far fewer absentees with bad

colds. A good plan, when a child has chilblains or a cold, is to make

a little flannel over-dress, which draws over the feet, and buttons at

the neck; no kicking off of the bedclothes will then be very serious;

whilst a cup of warm milk or arrowroot or gruel, drunk when the little

one is put to bed, is the best thing for keeping up the circulation in

the feet and hands and preventing the discomforts of broken chilblains.

These remarks of course apply principally to healthy children and

people. The delicate of all ages must obey their medical advisers, and

not risk a wet walk, however well secured against it, if they have been

forbidden to go out.

With all people, food is at the same time one of the principal aids

in combating colds and coughs. More heat-giving foods are required in

winter, to keep up sufficient warmth, and many people suffer simply

because they do not look upon the matter in this light. Parents will

tell you that their boys and girls will not eat fat meat or fat bacon,

or take salad dressed with oil, or take their porridge. Variety might

perhaps tempt them. They might be induced to eat bread crisply fried

in dripping either for breakfast or supper; or they might have gruel

or arrowroot just before going to bed, which would both warm and

sustain them; or, supposing they turn from all with dislike, a very

good investment would be to buy two or three dozen cheap boxes of

chocolate, and then dole out the boxes one by one, for the children to

take to school or eat with their lunch. Chocolate is both nutritious

and heat-giving, and nearly every child likes it. Care, however,

should be taken that pure chocolate is eaten. Thick soups, such as

pea, lentil, or potato soup, are very wholesome, and contain plenty of

heat-giving materials, whilst they are perhaps cheaper than chocolate.

Many children, indeed, might be saved from the doctor’s hands, if their

tastes were more consulted as to food, and they were given heat-giving

foods, which they liked, and would eat, instead of suet puddings or

fats, which they disliked.

‘NOT BEAUTIFUL!’

They say thou art not beautiful.

To _me_ thou art most fair!

And shrined within my faithful heart,

Thine image dear I wear.

In every glance, in every smile,

I see a nameless grace;

For love of mine, an angel’s soul

Shines through thy mortal face!

Thy hand is rough, and brown with toil,

Yet soft as summer rain;

With light and soothing touch it falls

Upon the brow of pain:

The sufferer feels its healing power

Rob death of half its sting,

And deems that little toil-stained hand

White as an angel’s wing.

And, sweetheart mine, no wildering lights

Flash from thy modest eyes;

Too timid is their downcast glance,

To startle or surprise;

Yet would I have them shining near,

To watch me when I pray,

To keep my heart from worldly thoughts,

Sweet eyes of gentle gray.

No modern fashions mar thy robe,

So softly flowing down;

Yet hangs a nameless dignity

Around that simple gown.

No pretty simpering queen of art,

Nor slave to fashion thou;

Thy pure and gracious womanhood

Is written on thy brow.

A throne of thought, that virgin brow

Hides in thy clustering hair,

Of ample breadth, that life may trace

Its noblest records there.

‘Not beautiful!’—my peerless queen!

What idle words they speak!

Who may not mark Love’s dawning blush

Shy mantling o’er thy cheek?

‘Not beautiful!’—my best beloved!

If sweet and humble worth

Crowns not with perfect loveliness,

Then nought is fair on earth.

The children fly from fairer forms,

To cluster round thy knee;

And that _they deem thee beautiful_,

By their fond looks I see!

My only love! I would not dare

To change thee if I could;

To me thou art most beautiful,

Because thou art so good.

To me thy gentle face must be

The loveliest ever seen—

The fairest face in all the world,

My love, my star, my queen!

FANNY FORRESTER.

* * * * *

Printed and Published by W. & R. CHAMBERS, 47 Paternoster Row, LONDON,

and 339 High Street, EDINBURGH.

* * * * *

_All Rights Reserved._

Chambers's Journal of Popular Literature, Science, and Art, Fifth Series, No. 11, Vol. I, March 15, 1884 · 第 3 / 3 段