His pursuers drew rein on the river-bank, and Sharduris re-entered

his kingdom in safety. He had lost nearly 73,000 men, killed or taken

prisoners, in addition to his chariots, and nearly the whole train of

horses, asses, servants, and artisans attached to his army; he left his

tent still standing, and those who were first to enter it laid hands

on his furniture and effects, his royal ornaments, his bed and portable

throne, with its cushions and bearing-poles, none of which had he found

time to take with him. Tiglath-pileser burnt them all on the spot as a

thank-offering, to the gods who had so signally favoured him; the bed

alone he retained, in order that he might dedicate it as a trophy to the

goddess Ishtar of Nineveh.

He had covered himself with glory, and might well be proud of his

achievement, yet the victory was in no way a decisive one. The damage

inflicted on the allies, considerable though it was, had cost him dear:

the forces left to him were not sufficient to enable him to finish the

campaign, and extort oaths of allegiance from the Syrian princes before

they had recovered from the first shock of defeat. He returned to

Nineveh, and spent the whole winter in reorganising his troops; while

his enemies, on the other hand, made preparations to repel the attack

energetically. Sharduris could not yet venture outside his mountain

strongholds, but the hope of being reinforced by him, as soon as he

had got together another army, encouraged the Syrian kings to remain

faithful to him in spite of his reverses.*

* The part played by Sharduris in the events of the years

which followed, passing mention of which was made by

Winckler (_Gesch. Bab. und Ass_,, pp. 224, 225), have been

fully dealt with by Belck and Lehmann (Chaldische

_Forschungen, in Veriiand. der Berliner anthropol.

Gesellschaft_, 1895, pp. 325-336).

Matîlu of Agusi, unable to carry the day against the Assyrians in

the open field, distributed his men among his towns, and resisted all

attacks with extraordinary persistence, confident that Sharduris would

at length come to help him, and with this hope he held out for three

years in his town of Arpad. This protracted resistance need no longer

astonish us, now that we know, from observations made on the spot, the

marvellous skill displayed in the fortification of these Asiatic towns.

The ruins of Arpad have yet to be explored, but those of Samalla have

been excavated, and show us the methods adopted for the defence of a

royal residence about the middle of the century with which we are now

concerned. The practice of building citadels on a square or rectangular

plan, which prevailed so largely under the Egyptian rule, had gradually

gone out of fashion as the knowledge of engineering advanced, and the

use of mines and military engines had been more fully developed among

the nations of Western Asia. It was found that the heavily fortified

angles of the enclosing wall merely presented so many weak points, easy

to attack but difficult to defend, no matter how carefully they might

be protected by an accumulation of obstacles. In the case of fortresses

built on a plain, where the plan was not modified by the nature of the

site, the enclosing wall was generally round or oval in shape, and free

from useless angles which might detract from its strength. The walls

were surmounted by battlements, and flanked at short intervals by round

or square towers, the tops of which rose but little, if indeed at all,

above the level of the curtain. In front of this main wall was a second

lower one, also furnished with towers and battlements, which followed

the outline of the first all the way round at an interval of some yards,

thus acting as a sort of continuous screen to it. The gates were little

less than miniature citadels built into each line of ramparts; the gate

of the outer wall was often surrounded by lower outworks, two square

bastions and walls enclosing an outer quadrangle which had to be crossed

before the real gate was reached.

[Illustration: 226a.jpg PLAN OF THE ANCIENT CITY OF ZINJIRLI.]

A reproduction by Faucher-Gudin of the first plan published

by Luschan.

When a breach had been made in this double enclosure, though the town

itself might be taken, the labours of the attacking force were not yet

over. In the very centre of the place, on a sort of artificial mound

or knoll, stood the royal castle, and resistance on the part of its

garrison would make it necessary for the enemy to undertake a second

siege no less deadly and protracted than the first. The keep of Zinjirli

had only a single gate approached by a narrow causeway.

[Illustration: 226b.jpg ONE OF THE GATES OF ZINJIRLI RESTORED]

Reproduction by Faucher-Gudin of the sketch published by

Luschan.

Within, it was divided by walls into five compartments, each of which

was independent of the rest, and had to be attacked separately. Ma-tîlu

knew he could hope for no mercy at the hands of the Assyrians; he

therefore struggled on to the last, and when at length obliged to

surrender, in the year 740 B.C., he paid for his obstinacy by the loss

of his throne, and perhaps also of his life.*

* Our knowledge of these events is imperfect, our only

information being derived from the very scanty details given

in the _Eponym Canon_; up to the present we can do no more

than trace the general course of events.

[Illustration: 227.jpg BIRD’S-EYE VIEW OF THE ROYAL CASTLE OF ZINJIRLI

AS RESTORED]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from the plan published in Luschan.

The inaction of Sharduris clearly showed that he was no longer in a

position to protect his allies, and that the backbone of his kingdom

was broken; the kings who had put faith in his help now gave him up, and

ambassadors flocked in from all parts, even from those which were not as

yet directly threatened. Kushtashpi of Kummukh, Tark-hulara of Gturgum,

Pisiris of Carchemish, Uriaîk of Kuî, came to Arpad in person to throw

themselves at the conqueror’s feet, bringing with them offerings of

gold and silver, of lead and iron, of ivory, carved and in the tusk,

of purple, and of dyed or embroidered stuffs, and were confirmed in the

possession of their respective territories; Hiram II. of Tyre, moreover,

and Eezin of Damascus sent their greetings to him.*

* _Annals of Tiglath-pileser III_., where the statement at

the close indicates that Tiglath-pileser received the

tributary kings of Syria “in Arpad,” after he had captured

that city.

The Patina, who in days gone by had threatened the fortunes of

Assur-nazir-pal, once again endeavoured to pose as the rivals of

Assyria, and Tutammû, sovereign of Unki, the most daring of the minor

states into which the Patina had been split up, declined to take part

in the demonstrations made by his neighbours. Tiglath-pileser marched

on Kinalua, sacked it, built a fortress there, and left a governor and

garrison behind him: Agusi and Unki henceforth sank down to the level of

mere provinces, administered by royal officers in the king’s name, and

permanently occupied by Assyrian troops.

Northern Syria was thus again incorporated with the empire, but Urartu,

although deprived of the resources with which Syria had supplied it,

continued to give cause for apprehension; in 739 B.C., however, a large

proportion of the districts of Naîri, to which it still clung, was

wrested from it, and a fortress was built at Ulluba, with a view to

providing a stable base of operations at this point on the northern

frontier. A rebellion, instigated, it may be, by his own agents,

recalled Tiglath-pileser to the Amanus in the year 738. The petty kings

who shared with Assyria the possession of the mountains and plains of

the Afrîn could not succeed in living at peace with one another, and

every now and then their disputes broke out into open warfare. Samalla

was at that time subject to a family of which the first members known to

history, Qaral and Panammu, shared Yaudi equally between them. Barzur,

son of Panammu I., had reigned there since about 765 B.C., and there can

be little doubt that he must have passed through the same vicissitudes

as his neighbours; faithful to Urartu as long as Sharduris kept the

upper hand, and to Assyria as soon as Tiglath-pileser had humiliated

Urartu, he had been killed in a skirmish by some rival. His son, Panammu

IL, came to the throne merely as a nominee of his suzerain, and seems to

have always rendered him faithful service; unfortunately, Yaudi was no

longer subject to the house of Panammu, but obeyed the rule of a certain

Azriyahu, who chafed at the presence of an alien power.*

* Azriyahu of Yaudi was identified with Azariah of Judah by

G. Smith, and this identification was for a long time

accepted without question by most Assyriologists. After a

violent controversy it has finally been shown that the

_Yaudi_ of Tiglath-pileser III.’a inscriptions ought to be

identified with the _Yadi_ or _Yaudi_ of the Zinjirli

inscriptions, and consequently that Azriyahu was not king of

Judah, but a king of Northern Syria. This view appears to me

to harmonise so well with what remains of the texts, and

with our knowledge of the events, that I have had no

hesitation in adopting it.

Azriyahu took advantage of the events which kept Tiglath-pileser fully

occupied in the east, to form a coalition in favour of himself among the

states on the banks of the Orontes, including some seventeen provinces,

dependencies of Hamath, and certain turbulent cities of Northern

Phoenicia, such as Byblos, Arka, Zimyra, Usnû, Siannu, Coele-Syria,

and even Hadrach itself. It is not quite clear whether Damascus and the

Hebrews took part in this movement. Jeroboam had died in 740, after a

prosperous reign of forty-one years, and on his death Israel seems

to have fallen under a cloud; six months later, his son Zechariah was

assassinated at Ibleam by Shallum, son of Jabesh, and the prophecy

of Amos, in which he declared that the house of Jeroboam should fall

beneath the sword of Jahveh,* was fulfilled. Shallum himself reigned

only one month: two other competitors had presented themselves

immediately after his crime;** the ablest of these, Menahem, son of

Gadi, had come from Tirzah to Samaria, and, after suppressing his

rivals, laid hands on the crown.*** He must have made himself master

of the kingdom little by little, the success of his usurpation being

entirely due to the ruthless energy invariably and everywhere displayed

by him; as, for instance, when Tappuakh (Tiphsah) refused to open

its gates at his summons, he broke into the town and slaughtered its

inhabitants.****

* Amos vii. 9.

** The nameless prophet, whose prediction is handed down to

us in Zech. ix.--xi., speaks of three shepherds cut off by

Javeh in one month (xi. 8); two of these were Zechariah and

Shallum; the third is not mentioned in the Book of Kings.

*** 2 Kings xiv. 23-29; xv. 8-15.

**** 2 Kings xv. 16. The Massoretic text gives the name of

the town as Tipsah, but the Septuagint has Taphôt, which led

Thenius to suggest Tappuakh as an emendation of Tipsah:

Stade prefers the emendation Tirzah.

All the defects of organisation, all the sources of weakness, which for

the last half-century had been obscured by the glories of Jeroboam II.,

now came to the surface, and defied all human efforts to avert their

consequences. “Then,” as Hosea complains, “is the iniquity of Ephraim

discovered, and the wickedness of Samaria; for they commit falsehood:

and the thief entereth in, and the troop of robbers spoileth without.

And they consider not in their hearts that I (Jahveh) remember all their

wickedness: now have their own doings beset them about; they are before

My face. They make the king glad with their wickedness and the princes

with their lies. They are all adulterers; they are as an oven heated by

the baker.... They... devour their judges; all their kings are fallen;

there is none among them that calleth unto Me.” * In Judah, Azariah

(Uzziah) had at first shown some signs of ability; he had completed the

conquest of Idumsea, Edom, and had fortified Elath,** but he suddenly

found himself stricken with leprosy, and was obliged to hand over the

reins of government of Jotham.***

* Sos. vii. 1-4, 7.

** 2 Kings xiv. 22; in 2 Ghron. xxvi. 6-15 he is credited

with the reorganisation of the army and of the Judsean

fortress, in addition to campaigns against the Philistines

and Arabs.

*** 2 Kings xv. 5; cf. 2 Ghron. xxvi. 19-21. Azariah is also

abbreviated into Uzziah. Tappuakh was a town situated on the

borders of Ephraim and Manasseh (Josh. xvi. 8; xvii. 7, 8).

His long life had been passed uneventfully, and without any disturbance,

under the protection of Jeroboam; but the very same defects which had

led to the ruin of Israel were at work also in Judah, and Menahem, in

spite of his enfeebled condition, had nothing to fear in this direction.

[Illustration: 232.jpg TIGLATH-PILESER III. IN HIS STATE CHARIOT]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a sketch published by Layard.

The danger which menaced him came rather from the east and the north,

where Damascus, aroused from its state of lethargy by Rezôn [Rezin] II.,

had again begun to strive after the hegemony of Syria.*

* The name of this king, written Rezin in the Bible (2 Kings

xv. 37; xvi. 5, 6, 9), is given as _Razunu_ in the Assyrian

texts; he was therefore Ilezôn II. A passage in the _Annals_

seems to indicate that Rezin’s father was prince of a city

dependent on Damascus, not king of Damascus itself;

unfortunately the text is too much mutilated to warrant us

in forming any definite conclusion on this point.

All these princes, when they found that the ambition of Tiglath-pileser

threatened to interfere with their own intrigues, were naturally

tempted to combine against him, and were willing to postpone to a more

convenient season the settlement of their own domestic quarrrels. But

Tiglath-pileser did not give them time for this; he routed Azriyahu, and

laid waste Kullani,* the chief centre of revolt, ravaged the valley of

the Orontes, and carried off the inhabitants of several towns, replacing

them with prisoners taken the year before during his campaign in Naîri.

* Kullani is the Calno or Calneh mentioned by Isaiah (x. 9)

and Amos (vi. 2), which lay somewhere between Arpad and

Hamath; the precise spot is not yet known.

After this feat the whole of Syria surrendered. Rezin and Menahem were

among the first to tender their homage, and the latter paid a thousand

talents of silver for the _firman_ which definitely confirmed his tenure

of the throne; the princes of Tyre, Byblos, Hamath, Carchemish, Milid,

Tabal, and several others followed their example--even a certain Zabibi,

queen of an Arab tribe, feeling compelled to send her gifts to the

conqueror.

A sudden rising among the Aramæan tribes on the borders of Elam obliged

Tiglath-pileser to depart before he had time to take full advantage of

his opportunity. The governors of Lullumi and Naîri promptly suppressed

the outbreak, and, collecting the most prominent of the rebels together,

sent them to the king in order that he might distribute them throughout

the cities of Syria: a colony of 600 prisoners from the town of Amlati

was established in the territory of Damaunu, 5400 from Dur were sent to

the fortresses of Unki, Kunalia, Khuzarra, Taî, Tarmanazi, Kulmadara,

Khatatirra, and Sagillu, while another 10,000 or so were scattered along

the Phoenician seaboard and among the adjacent mountains. The revolt

had meanwhile spread to the nations of Media, where it was, perhaps,

fomented by the agents of Urartu; and for the second time within seven

years (737 B.C.) Tiglath-pileser trampled underfoot the countries over

which he had ridden in triumph at the beginning of his career--the

Bît-Kapsi, the Bît-Sangibuti, the Bît-Tazzakki, the Bît-Zulazash,

the Bît-Matti, and Umliash. The people of Upash, among the Bît-Kapsi,

entrenched themselves on the slopes of Mount Abirus; but he carried

their entrenchments by storm. Ushuru of Taddiruta and Burdadda of

Nirutakta were seized with alarm, and hid themselves in their mountain

gorges; but he climbed up in pursuit of them, drove them out of their

hiding-places, seized their possessions, and made them prisoners.

Similar treatment was meted out to all those who proved refractory; some

he despoiled, others he led captive, and “bursting upon the remainder

like the downpour of Bammân,” permitted none of them to escape. He

raised trophies all along his line of march: in Bau, a dependency of

Bît-Ishtar, he set up a pointed javelin dedicated to Ninip, on which

he had engraved a panegyric of the virtues of his master Assur; near

Shilkhazi, a town founded, in bygone days, by the Babylonians, he

erected a statue of himself, and a pillar consecrated to Marduk in

Til-ashshur. In the following year he again attacked Urartu and occupied

the mountain province of Nâl, which formed one of its outlying defences

(736). The year after he entered on the final struggle with Sharduris,

and led the flower of his forces right under the walls of Dhuspas,* the

enemy’s capital.

* The name is written Turuspas in the inscriptions of

Tiglath-pileser III.

Dhuspas really consisted of two towns joined together. One of these,

extending over the plain by the banks of the Alaîs and in the direction

of the lake, was surrounded by fertile gardens and villas, in which

the inhabitants spent the summer at their ease. It was protected by

an isolated mass of white and red nummulitic chalk, the steep sides of

which are seamed with fissures and tunnelled with holes and caverns from

top to bottom.

[Illustration: 235.jpg THE ROCK AND CITADEL OF VAN AT THE PRESENT DAY]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by M. Binder.

The plateau in which it terminates, and which rises to a height of 300

feet at its loftiest point, is divided into three main terraces, each

completely isolated from the other two, and forming, should occasion

arise, an independent fortress, Ishpuinis, Menuas, Argistis, and

Sharduris II. had laboured from generation to generation to make this

stronghold impregnable, and they had succeeded in the attempt.

[Illustration: 236.jpg ENTRANCE TO THE MODERN CITADEL OF VAN FROM THE

WESTWARD]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by M. Binder.

There can be little or no doubt, however, that this is merely a variant

of the name usually written as Tuspas, Tuspana, Dhuspana, the Thospia of

classical times; properly speaking, it was the capital of Biainas. The

only access to it was from the western side, by a narrow bridle-path,

which almost overhung the precipice as it gradually mounted to the

summit. This path had been partially levelled, and flanked with walls

and towers which commanded the approach throughout its whole length;

on the platforms at the summit a citadel had been constructed, together

with a palace, temples, and storehouses, in which was accumulated a

sufficient supply of arms and provisions to enable the garrison to tire

out the patience of any ordinary foe; treason or an unusually prolonged

siege could only get the better of such a position. Tiglath-pileser

invested the citadel and ravaged its outskirts without pity, hoping, no

doubt, that he would thus provoke the enemy into capitulating. Day after

day, Sharduris, perched in his lofty eyrie, saw his leafy gardens laid

bare under the hatchet, and his villages and the palaces of his nobles

light up the country round as far as the eye could reach: he did not

flinch, however, and when all had been laid waste, the Assyrians set up

a statue of their king before the principal gate of the fortress, broke

up their camp, and leisurely retired. They put the country to fire and

sword, destroyed its cities, led away every man and beast they could

find into captivity, and then returned to Nineveh laden with plunder.

Urartu was still undaunted, and Sharduris remained king as before; but

he was utterly spent, and his power had sustained a blow from which

it never recovered. He had played against Assur with the empire of the

whole Asiatic world as the stake, and the dice had gone against him:

compelled to renounce his great ambitions from henceforth, he sought

merely to preserve his independence. Since then, Armenia has more than

once challenged fortune, but always with the same result; it fared no

better under Tigranes in the Roman epoch, than under Sharduris in the

time of the Assyrians; it has been within an ace of attaining the goal

of its ambitions, then at the last moment its strength has failed, and

it has been forced to retire worsted from the struggle. Its position

prevented it from exercising very wide influence; hidden away in a

corner of Asia at the meeting-point of three or four great mountain

ranges, near the source of four rivers, all flowing in different

directions, it has lacked that physical homogeneity without which no

people, however gifted, can hope to attain supremacy; nature has doomed

it to remain, like Syria, split up into compartments of unequal size

and strength, which give shelter to half a score of independent

principalities, each one of them perpetually jealous of the rest. From

time to time it is invested with a semblance of unity, but for the

most part it drags on an uneventful existence, dismembered into as many

fragments as there happen to be powerful states around it, its only

chance of complete reunion lying in the possibility of one or other of

these attaining sufficient predominance to seize the share of the others

and absorb it.

The subjection of Urartu freed Assyria from the only rival which could

at this moment have disputed its supremacy on the banks of the Euphrates

and the Tigris. The other nations on its northern and eastern frontiers

as yet possessed no stability; they might, in the course of a passing

outburst, cut an army to pieces or annex part of a province, but they

lacked strength to follow up their advantage, and even their most

successful raids were sure, in the long run, to lead to terrible

reprisals, in which their gains were two or three times outweighed by

their losses in men and treasure. For nearly a hundred years Nineveh

found its hands free, and its rulers were able to concentrate all their

energy on two main points of the frontier--to the south-west on Syria

and Egypt, to the south-east on Chaldæa and Elam. Chaldæa gave little

trouble, but the condition of Syria presented elements of danger. The

loyalty of its princes was more apparent than real; they had bowed their

necks after the fall of Unki, but afterwards, as the years rolled on

without any seeming increase in the power of Assyria, they again took

courage and began once more to quarrel among themselves. Menahem had

died, soon after he had paid his tribute (737 B.c.); his son Pekahiah

had been assassinated less than two years later (736)* and his murderer,

Pekah, son of Remaliah, was none too firmly seated on the throne.

Anarchy was triumphant throughout Israel; so much so that Judah seized

the opportunity for throwing off the yoke it had borne for well-nigh

a hundred years. Pekah, conscious of his inability to suppress the

rebellion, called in Rezin to help him. The latter was already on the

way when Jotham was laid with his fathers (736 B.C.), and it was Ahaz,

the son of Jotham, who had to bear the brant of the assault. He was

barely twenty years old, a volatile, presumptuous, and daring youth,

who was not much dismayed by his position.** Jotham had repaired the

fortifications of Jerusalem, which had been left in a lamentable state

ever since the damage done to them in the reign of Amaziah;*** his

successor now set to work to provide the city with the supply of water

indispensable for its defence,**** and, after repairing the ancient

aqueducts, conceived the idea of constructing a fresh one in the spur of

Mount Sion, which extends southwards.

* 2 Kings xv. 22-26. The chronology of the events which took

place between the death of Menahem and the fall of Samaria,

as presented by the biblical documents in the state in which

they have been transmitted to us, is radically inaccurate:

following the example of most recent historians, I have

adhered exclusively to the data furnished by the Assyrian

texts, merely indicating in the notes the reasons which have

led me to adopt certain dates in preference to others.

** 2 Kings xv. 38, xvi. 1, 2. Ahaz is called Iaukhazi, i.e.

Jehoahaz, in the Assyrian texts, and this would seem to have

been the original form of the name.

*** The restoration of the walls of Jerusalem by Jotham is

only mentioned in 2 Chron. xxvii. 3.

**** We may deduce this from the words of Isaiah (vii. 3),

where he represents Ahaz “at the end of the conduit of the

upper pool, in the highway of the fuller’s field.” Ahaz had

gone there to inspect the works intended for the defence of

the aqueduct.

As time pressed, the work was begun simultaneously at each end; the

workmen had made a wide detour underground, probably in order to avoid

the caves in which the kings of Judah had been laid to rest ever since

the time of David,* and they were beginning to despair of ever uniting

the two sections of the tunnel, when they suddenly heard one another

through the wall of rock which divided them. A few blows with the

pick-axe opened a passage between them, and an inscription on the wall

adjoining the entrance on the east side, the earliest Hebrew inscription

we possess, set forth the vicissitudes of the work for the benefit of

future generations. It was scarcely completed when Kezin, who had

joined forces with Pekah at Samaria, came up and laid regular siege to

Jerusalem.**

* This is the highly ingenious hypothesis put forward and

defended with much learning by Clermont-Ganneau, in order to

account for the large curve described by the tunnel.

** 2 Kings xvi. 5; cf. 2 Chron. xxviii. 5-8. It was on this

occasion that Isaiah delivered the prophecies which, after

subsequent revision, furnished the bulk of chaps, vi. 1--x. 4.

The allies did not propose to content themselves with exacting tribute

from the young king; they meant to dethrone him, and to set up in

his room a son of Tabeel, whom they had brought with them; they were

nevertheless obliged to retire without effecting a breach in his

defences and leave the final assault till the following campaign. Rezin,

however, had done as much injury as he could to Judah; he had laid waste

both mountain and plain, had taken Elath by storm and restored it to the

Edomites,* and had given a free hand to the Philistines (735).**

* 2 Kings xvi. 6, where the Massoretic text states that the

Syrians retained the town, while the Septuagint maintain

that he restored it to the Edomites.

** Chron. xxviii. 18, where a list is given of the towns

wrested from Judah by the Philistines. The delight felt by

the Philistines at the sight of Judah’s abasement seems to

be referred to in the short prophecy of Isaiah (xiv. 29-32),

wrongly ascribed to the year of Ahaz’s death.

[Illustration: 241.jpg HEBREW INSCRIPTION ON THE SILOAM AQUEDUCT]

A direct reproduction from a plaster cast now in Paris. The

inscription discovered by Schick, in 1880, has since been

mutilated, and only the fragments are preserved in the

museum at Constantinople. Some writers think it was composed

in the time of Hezekiah; for my own part, I agree with Stade

in assigning it to the period of Ahaz.

The whole position seemed so hopeless, that a section of the people

began to propose surrendering to the mercy of the Syrians.*

* This seems to be an obvious inference from the words of

Isaiah (viii. 6): “Forasmuch as this people hath refused the

waters of Shiloah that go softly, _and lose courage because

of Rezin and Bemaliali’s son_.” [The R.V. reads “_rejoice

in_” Rezin, etc.--Tr.]

Ahaz looked around him in search of some one on whom he might call for

help. All his immediate neighbours were hostile; but behind them, in the

background, were two great powers who might be inclined to listen to his

appeal--Egypt and Assyria. Ever since the expedition of Sheshonq into

Asia, Egypt seemed to have lost all interest in foreign politics.

Osorkon had not inherited the warlike propensities of his father,

and his son, Takelôti I., and his grandson, Osorkon II., followed his

example.*

* The chronology of this period is still very uncertain, and

the stelae of the Serapseum, which enable us to fix the

order of the various reigns, yield no information as to

their length. Sheshonq I. did not reign much longer than

twenty-one years, which is his latest known date, and we may

take the reign of twenty-one years attributed to him by

Manetho as being substantially correct. The latest dates we

possess are as follows: Osorkon I., twelfth year, and

Takelôti I., sixth year or seventh year. Lastly, we have a

twenty-ninth year in the case of Osorkon II., with a

reference in the case of the twenty-eighth year to the fifth

year of a Takelôti whose first cartouche is missing, and who

perhaps died before his father and co-regent. In Manetho,

Osorkon I. is credited with a reign of fifteen years, and

his three next successors with a total of twenty-five years

between them, which is manifestly incorrect, since the

monuments give twenty-nine years, or twenty-three at the

very least, if we take into account the double date in the

case of the first two of these kings. The wisest course

seems to be to allow forty-five years to Osorkon and his two

successors: if Sheshonq, as I believe, died in 924, the

fifty years allotted to the next three Pharaohs would bring

us down to 880, and it is in this year that I am, for the

present, inclined to place the death of Osorkon II.

[Illustration: 242.jpg BRONZE]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from. Lanzone’s statuette.

[Illustration: 243.jpg THE GREAT TEMPLE OF BUBASTIS DURINGNAVILLE’s

EXCAVATIONS]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph by Naville.

These monarchs regarded themselves as traditionary suzerains of the

country of Kharu, i.e. of Israel, Judah, Ammon, and Moab, and their

authority may perhaps have been recognised by the Philistines in the

main, but they seldom stirred from their own territory, and contented

themselves with protecting their frontiers against the customary

depredations of the Libyan and Asiatic nomads.*

* Repressive measures of this kind are evidently referred to

in passages similar to those in which Osorkon II. boasts of

having “overthrown beneath his feet the Upper and Lower

Lotanu,” and speaks of the exploits of the sons of Queen

Kalamâît against certain tribes whose name, though

mutilated, seems to have been Libyan in character.

Under their rule, Egypt enjoyed fifty years of profound peace, which was

spent in works of public utility, especially in the Delta, where, thanks

to their efforts, Bubastis came to be one of the most splendid among the

cities of secondary importance.*

* All our knowledge of the history of the temple of Bubastis

dates from Naville’s excavations.

Its temple, which had been rebuilt by Ramses II. and decorated by the

Rames-sides, was in a sorry plight when the XXIInd dynasty came into

power. Sheshonq I. did little or nothing to it, but Osorkon I. entirely

remodelled it, and Osorkon II. added several new halls, including,

amongst others, one in which he celebrated, in the twenty-second year

of his reign, the festival of his deification. A record of some of the

ceremonies observed has come down to us in the mural paintings. There

we see the king, in a chapel, consecrating a statue of himself in

accordance with the ritual in use since the time of Amenôthes III., and

offering the figure devout and earnest worship; all the divinities of

Egypt have assembled to witness the enthronement of this new member of

their confraternity, and take part in the sacrifices accompanying

his consecration. This gathering of the gods is balanced by a human

festival, attended by Nubians and Kushites, as well as by the courtiers

and populace. The proceedings terminated, apparently, with certain

funeral rites, the object being to make the identification of Osorkon

with Osiris complete.

[Illustration: 244.jpg PICTURE IN THE HALL OF THE HARPS IN THE FIFTH

TOMB]

The Egyptian deities served in a double capacity, as gods of the dead as

well as of the living, and no exception could be made in favour of the

deified Osorkon; while yet living he became an Osiris, and his double

was supposed to animate those prophetic statues in which he appeared as

a mummy no less than those which represented him as still alive.

[Illustration: 245.jpg GATE OF THE FESTIVAL HALL AT BUBASTIS]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a restoration by Naville.

Another temple of small size, also dedicated to Bastîfc or Pasht, which

had been built in the time of Ramses II., was enlarged by Osorkon I.,

and richly endowed with workshops, lands, cattle, slaves, and precious

metals: Tumu-Khopri of Heliopolis, to mention but one of the

deities worshipped there, received offerings of gold in value by

weight.£120,000, and silver ingots worth £12,000.*

* This is the small temple afterwards described by Herodotus

as being dedicated to Hermes.

A country which could afford to indulge in extravagances of this nature

must have been in a flourishing condition, and everything goes to prove

that Egypt prospered under the rule of the early Bubastite kings.

The very same causes, however, which had ruined the Ramessides and

the Tanites were now openly compassing the downfall of the Bubastite

dynasty. The military feudalism from which it had sprung, suppressed for

a time by Sheshonq I., developed almost unchecked under his successors.

They had thought to break it up and turn it to their own advantage, by

transferring the more important religious functions and the principal

fiefs to their own sons or nephews. They governed Memphis through

the high priests of Phtah; a prince of the blood represented them at

Khmunu,* another at Khninsu** (Heracleopolis), and others in various

cities of the Delta, each of them being at the head of several thousand

Mashauasha, or Libyan soldiers on whose fidelity they could entirely

rely.

* E.g. Namrôti, under Piônkhi-Mîamun, whose rights were such

that he adopted the protocol of the Pharaohs.

** Stole 1959 of the Serapæum contains the names of five

successive princes of this city, the first of whom was

Namrôti, son of Osorkon II., and high priest of Thebes; a

member of the same family, named Pefzââbastît, had taken

cartouches under Osorkon III. of the XXIIIrd dynasty.

Thebes alone had managed to exclude these representatives of the ruling

dynasty, and its princes, guided in this particular by the popular

prejudice, persistently refused to admit into their bodyguard any but

the long-tried Mâzaîu. Moreover, Thebes lost no opportunity of proving

itself to be still the most turbulent of the baronies. Its territory

had suffered no diminution since the time of Hrihor, and half of Upper

Egypt, from Elephantine to Siut, acknowledged its sway.1

* It is evident that this was so from the first steps taken

by Piônkhi-Miamun’s generals: they meet the army and fleet

of Tafnakhti and the princes of the north right under the

walls of Hormopolis, but say nothing of any feudal princes

of the south. Their silence is explained if we assume that

Thebes, being a dependency of Ethiopia, retained at that

date, i.e. in the time of the XXIInd dynasty, the same or

nearly the same boundaries which it had won for itself under

the XXIst.

Through all the changes of dynasty its political constitution had

remained unaltered; Amon still ruled there supreme as ever, and nothing

was done until he had been formally consulted in accordance with ancient

usage. Anputi, in spite of his being a son of Sheshonq, was compelled

to adopt the title of high priest in order to rule in peace, and had

married some daughter or niece of the last of the Painotmu. After his

death, good care was taken to prevent the pontificate from passing to

one of his children, as this would have re-established a Theban dynasty

which might have soon proved hostile to that of Bubastis. To avoid this,

Osorkon I. made over the office and fief to his own son Sheshonq. The

latter, after a time, thought he was sufficiently powerful to follow the

example of Paînotmu and adopt the royal cartouches; but, with all his

ambition, he too failed to secure the succession to the male line of

his descendants, for Osorkon II. appointed his own son Namrôti, already

prince of Khninsu, to succeed him. The amalgamation of these two posts

invested the person on whom they were conferred with almost regal power;

Khninsu was, indeed, as we know, the natural rampart of Memphis and

Lower Egypt against invasion from the south, and its possessor was in a

position to control the fate of the empire almost as he pleased.

Osorkon must have had weighty reasons for taking a step which placed him

practically at the mercy of his son, and, indeed, events proved that but

little reliance could be placed on the loyalty of the Thebans, and that

energetic measures were imperative to keep them in the path of duty or

lead them back to it. The decadence of the ancient capital had sadly

increased since the downfall of the descendants of Hrihor.

[Illustration: 248.jpg SMALL BRONZE SPHINX OF SIAMUN]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from the original now in the Louvre.

The few public works which they had undertaken, and which Sheshonq I.

encouraged to the best of his ability, had been suspended owing to want

of money, and the craftsmen who had depended on them for support were

suffering from poverty: the makers of small articles of a religious

or funerary character, carvers of wood or stone, joiners, painters of

mummy-cases, and workers in bronze, alone managed to eke out a bare

livelihood, thanks to commissions still given to them by officials

attached to the temples. Theban art, which in its best period had

excelled in planning its works on a gigantic scale, now gladly devoted

itself to the production of mere knick-knacks, in place of the colossal

figures of earlier days.

[Illustration: 249.jpg RUINS OF THE TEMPLE AT KHNINSU AFTER NAVILLE’s

EXCAVATIONS]

Drawn by Boudier, from a photograph in Naville. The

illustration shows what now remains of the portions of the

temple rebuilt in the time of Ramses II.

We have statuettes some twelve or fifteen inches high, crudely coloured,

wooden stelæ, shapeless _ushâbti_ redeemed from ugliness by a coating

of superb blue enamel, and, above all, those miniature sphinxes

representing queens or kings, which present with two human arms either

a table of offerings or a salver decorated with cartouches. The starving

populace, its interests and vanity alike mortified by the accession of

a northern dynasty, refused to accept the decay of its fortunes with

resignation, and this spirit of discontent was secretly fomented by the

priests or by members of the numerous families which boasted of their

descent from the Eamessides. Although hereditary claims to the throne

and the pontificate had died out or lost their force in the male line,

they were still persistently urged by the women: consecrated from

their birth to the service of Amon, and originally reserved to sing

his praises or share his nuptial couch, those of them who married

transmitted to their children, and more especially to their daughters,

the divine germ which qualified them for the throne. They and their

followers never ceased to look for the day when the national deity

should shake off his apathy, and, becoming the champion of their cause

against the Bubastite or Tanite usurpers, restore their city to the rank

and splendour from which it had fallen. Namrôti married one of these

Theban princesses, and thus contrived to ward off the danger of revolt

during his lifetime; but on his death or disappearance an insurrection

broke out. Sheshonq II. had succeeded Osorkon II., and he, in his turn,

was followed by Takelôti II. Takelôti chose Kala-mâit, daughter of

Namrôti, as his lawful wife, formally recognised her as queen, and set

up numerous statues and votive monuments in her honour. But all in

vain: this concession failed to conciliate the rebellious, and the whole

Thebaid rose against him to a man. In the twelfth year of his reign he

entrusted the task of putting down the revolt to his son Osorkon, at the

same time conferring upon him the office of high priest. It took several

years to repress the rising; defeated in the eleventh year, the rebels

still held the field in the fifteenth year of the king, and it was not

till some time after, between the fifteenth and twenty-second year of

Takelôti II., that they finally laid down their arms.* At the end of

this struggle the king’s power was quite exhausted, while that of the

feudal magnates had proportionately increased. Before long, Egypt was

split up into a number of petty states, some of them containing but a

few towns, while others, following the example of Thebes, boldly annexed

several adjacent nomes. A last remnant of respect for the traditional

monarchy kept them from entirely repudiating the authority of Pharaoh.

They still kept up an outward show of submission to his rule; they paid

him military service when called upon, and appealed to him as umpire in

their disputes, without, however, always accepting his rulings, and when

they actually came to blows among themselves, were content to exercise

their right of private warfare under his direction.** The royal domain

gradually became narrowed down to the Memphite nome and the private

appanages of the reigning house, and soon it no longer yielded the sums

necessary for the due performance of costly religious ceremonies, such

as the enthronement or burial of an Apis. The pomp and luxury usually

displayed on such occasions grew less and less under the successors of

Takelôti II., Sheshonq III., Pimi, and Sheshonq IV.***

* The story of these events is told in several greatly

mutilated inscriptions to be found at Karnak on the outer

surface of the south wall of the Hall of Columns.

** It is evident that this was so, from a romance discovered

by Krall.

*** One need only go to the Louvre and compare the Apis

stelae erected during this period with those engraved in the

time of the XXVIth dynasty, in order to realise the low ebb

to which the later kings of the XXIInd dynasty had fallen:

the fact that the chapel and monuments were built under

their direction shows that they were still masters of

Memphis. We have no authentic date for Sheshonq II., and the

twenty-ninth year is the latest known in the case of

Takelôti II., but we know that Sheshonq III. reigned fifty-

two years, and, after two years of Pimi, we find a reference

to the thirty-seventh year of Sheshonq IV. If we allow a

round century for these last kings we are not likely to be

far out: this would place the close of the Bubastite dynasty

somewhere about 780 B.C.

When the last of these passed away after an inglorious reign of at least

thirty-seven years, the prestige of his race had so completely declined

that the country would have no more of it; the sceptre passed into the

hands of another dynasty, this time of Tanite origin.* It was probably

a younger branch of the Bubastite family allied to the Ramessides

and Theban Pallacides. Petu-bastis, the first of the line, secured

recognition in Thebes,** and throughout the rest of Egypt as well, but

his influence was little greater than that of his predecessors; as in

the past, the real power was in the hands of the high priests.

* The following list gives the names of the Pharaohs of the

XXIIth dynasty in so far as they have been ascertained up

to the present:--

[Illustration: 252.jpg TABLE OF PHARAOHS OF THE XXIITH DYNASTY]

** This fact has recently been placed beyond doubt by

inscriptions found on the quay at Karnak near the water-

marks of the Nile.

One of them, Auîti by name, even went so far, in the fourteenth or

fifteenth year, as to declare himself king, and had his cartouches

inscribed on official documents side by side with those of the Tanite

monarch.* His kingship died with him, just as that of Patnotmu had done

in similar circumstances, and two years later we find his successor,

Harsiisît, a mere high priest without pretensions to royalty.

* No. 26 of Legrain’s inscriptions tells us the height of

the Nile in the sixteenth year of Petubastît, which was also

the second year of King Auîti. Seeing that Auîti’s name

occurs in the place occupied by that of the high priest of

Thebes in other inscriptions of the same king, I consider it

probable that he was reigning in Thebes itself, and that he

was a high priest who had become king in the same way as

Paînotmu under the XXIst dynasty.

[Illustration: 253.jpg KING PETUBASTIS AT PRAYER]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from a small door now in the Louvre.

Doubtless his was not an isolated case; all the grandees who happened

to be nearly related either to the dethroned or to the reigning houses

acted in like manner, and for the first time for many years Egypt

acknowledged the simultaneous sway of more than one legitimate Pharaoh.

Matters became still worse under Osorkon III.; although he, too,

introduced a daughter of Anion into his harem, this alliance failed to

give him any hold over Thebes, and even the Seven Nomes and the Delta

were split up to such an extent that at one time they included something

like a score of independent principalities, three of which, Hermopolis,

Heracleopolis, and Tentramu, were administered by kings who boasted

cartouches similar to those of Tanis and Bubastis.

About 740 B.C. there appeared in the midst of these turbulent and

extortionate nobles a man who, by sheer force of energy and talent,

easily outstripped all competitors. Tafnakhti was a chief of obscure

origin, whose hereditary rights extended merely over the village of

Nutirît and the outskirts of Sebennytos. One or two victories gained

over his nearest neighbours encouraged him to widen the sphere of his

operations. He first of all laid hands on those nomes of the Delta

which extended to the west of the principal arm of the Nile, the Saite,

Athribite, Libyan, and Memphite nomes; these he administered through

officers under his own immediate control; then, leaving untouched the

eastern provinces, over which Osorkon III. exercised a make-shift,

easygoing rule, he made his way up the river. Maitumu and the Fayum

accepted him as their suzerain, but Khninsu and its king, Pefzââbastît,

faithful to their allegiance,* offered strenuous resistance.

* Pefzââbastît, King of Heracleopolis, seems to be identical

with the Pharaoh Pefzâbastît of the Berlin sarcophagus.

He then crossed over to the right bank, and received the homage of

Heliopolis and Phebtepahê; he put the inhabitants of Uabu to ransom,

established a close blockade of Khninsu, and persuaded Namrôti, King of

Khmunu, to take an oath of allegiance. At length, those petty kings and

princes of the Said and the Delta who still remained unconquered called

upon Ethiopia, the only power capable of holding its ground against him,

for help. The “vile Kaushu” (Cush) probably rose to be an independent

state about the time when Sheshonq and the Bubastite kings came into

power.

[Illustration: 255.jpg VIEW OF A PART OF THE RUINS OF NAPATA]

Reproduced by Faucher-Gudin, from a lithograph published in

Cailliaud.

Peopled by Theban settlers, and governed by the civil and religious code

of Thebes, the provinces which lay between the cataract of Hannek and

the confluence of the two Mies soon became a second Thebaid, more barren

and less wealthy than the first, but no less tied to the traditions

of the past. Napata, its capital, lay in the plain at the foot of a

sandstone cliff, which rose perpendicularly to a height of nearly two

hundred feet, its summit, when viewed from the southwest, presenting an

accidental resemblance to a human profile.* This was the _Du-uabu_, or

Sacred Mount, in the heart of which the god was supposed to have his

dwelling; the ruins of several temples can still be seen near the

western extremity of the hill, the finest of them being dedicated to a

local Amon-Râ.

* The natives believe this profile to have been cut by human

hands--an error which has been shared by more than one

modern traveller.

[Illustration: 256.jpg GEBEL-BARKAL, THE SACRED MOUNTAIN OF NAPATA]

Reproduced by Faucher-Gudin, from a lithograph in Cailliaud.

This Amon was a replica of the Theban Amon on a smaller scale, and was

associated with the same companions as his prototype, Maut, his consort,

and Khonsu, his son. He owed his origin to the same religious concepts,

and was the central figure of a similar myth, the only difference being

that he was represented in composite shape, with a ram’s head; perhaps

a survival from some earlier indigenous deity, such as Didun, for

instance, who had been previously worshipped in those parts; his priests

lived in accordance with the rules of the Theban hierarchy.

[Illustration: 257.jpg RUINS OF THE TEMPLE OF AMON AT NAPATA]

Reproduced by Faucher-Gudin, from a lithograph published by

Cailliaud.

We can readily believe that when Hrihor extorted the title of “Royal Son

of Kaushu” from the weaklings who occupied the throne at the close of

the Ramesside dynasty, he took care to install one of the members of

his family as high priest at Napata, and from henceforward had the whole

country at his bidding. Subsequently, when Paînotmu II. was succeeded by

Auputi at Thebes, it seems that the Ethiopian priests refused to ratify

his election. Whether they conferred the supreme power on one of their

own number, or whether some son of Paînotmu, flying from the Bubastite

kings, arrived at the right moment to provide them with a master, is not

quite clear.

[Illustration: 258.jpg PLAN OF THE TEMPLE OF AMON AT NAPATA]

Reproduced by Faucher-Gudin, from the plan drawn up and

published by Cailliaud.

The kings of Ethiopia, priests from the first, never lost their

sacerdotal character. They continued to be men of God, and as such it

was necessary that they should be chosen by the god himself. On the

death of a sovereign, Amon at once became regent in the person of his

prophet, and continued to act until the funeral rites were celebrated.

As soon as these ceremonies were completed, the army and the people

collected at the foot of the Sacred Mount; the delegates of the various

orders of the state were led into the sanctuary, and then, in their

presence, all the males of the royal family--“the king’s brothers,” as

they were called--were paraded before the statue of the god; he on whom

the god laid his hand as he passed was considered to be the chosen one

of Amon, and consecrated king without delay.*

* This is the ritual described in the _Stele of the

Enthronement_. Perhaps it was already in use at Thebes under

the XXIst and XXIInd dynasties, at the election of the high

priest, whether he happened to be a king or not; at any

rate, a story of the Ptolemaic period told by Synesius in

_The Egyptian_ seems to point to this conclusion.

As may be readily imagined, the new monarch thus appointed by divine

dictation was completely under the control of the priests, and before

long, if he failed to prove sufficiently tractable, they claimed the

right to dispense with him altogether; they sent him an order to commit

suicide, and he obeyed. The boundaries of this theocratic state varied

at different epochs; originally it was confined to the region between

the First Cataract and the mouth of the Blue Nile. The bulk of the

population consisted of settlers of Egyptian extraction and Egyptianised

natives; but isolated, as they were, from Egypt proper by the rupture of

the political ties which had bound them to the metropolis, they ceased

to receive fresh reinforcements from the northern part of the valley as

they had formerly done, and daily became more closely identified with

the races of various origin which roamed through the deserts of Libya or

Arabia. This constant infiltration of free or slavish Bedâwin blood and

the large number of black women found in the harems of the rich, and

even in the huts of the common people, quickly impaired the purity of

the race, even among the tipper classes of the nation, and the type came

to resemble that of the negro tribes of Equatorial Africa.*

* Taharqa furnishes us with a striking example of this

degeneration of the Egyptian type. His face shows the

characteristic features of the black race, both on the

Egyptian statue as well as on the Assyrian stele of

Sinjirli.

[Illustration: 260a.jpg A NEARLY PURE ETHIOPIAN TYPE]

[Illustration: 260b.jpg mixed negro and Ethiopian TYPE]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from Lepsius.

The language fared no better in the face of this invasion, and the

written character soon became as corrupt as the language; words foreign

to the Egyptian vocabulary, incorrect expressions, and barbarous errors

in syntax were multiplied without stint. The taste for art decayed,

and technical ability began to deteriorate, the moral and intellectual

standard declined, and the mass of the people showed signs of relapsing

into barbarism: the leaders of the aristocracy and the scribes alone

preserved almost intact their inheritance from an older civilisation.

Egypt still attracted them: they looked upon it as their rightful

possession, torn from them by alien usurpers in defiance of all sense

of right, and they never ceased to hope that some day, when the god saw

fit, they would win back their heritage. Were not their kings of the

posterity of Sibu, the true representatives of the Ramessides and the

solar race, compared with whom the northern Pharaohs, even those whose

mothers ranked as “worshippers” of Amon, were but mere mushroom kings?

Thebes admitted the validity of their claims: it looked to them for

help, and the revolts by which it had been torn ever since the reign of

Osorkon II. were, perhaps, instigated by the partisans of Ethiopia. In

the time of Petubastis its high priests, Harsiisît and Takelôti, were

still connected with the Tanites; after that it placed itself under

the immediate orders of Ethiopia, and the pontificate disappeared. The

accession of a sovereign who was himself invested by hereditary right

with the functions and title of high priest of Amon henceforth rendered

the existence of such an office superfluous at Thebes: it would almost

have meant an _imperium in imperio_. The administration of religious,

and perhaps also of political, affairs was, therefore, handed over

to the deputy prophet, and this change still further enhanced the

importance of the “female worshippers of the god.” In the absence of

the king, who had his capital at Napata, they remained the sole

representatives of legitimate authority in the Thebaid: the chief among

them soon came to be regarded as a veritable _Lady of Thebes_, and,

subject to the god, mistress of the city and its territory.

It is not quite clear whether it was Piônkhi Miamun or one of his

immediate predecessors who took possession of the city. The nomes

dependent on Amon followed the example of the capital, and the whole

Theban territory as far as Siut had been occupied by Ethiopian troops,

when in the twenty-first year of the king’s reign the princes of the

Delta and Middle Egypt appealed to the court of Napata for help.

[Illustration: 262.jpg MAP OF MIDDLE EGYPT DURING THE CAMPAIGN OF

PIONKHI]

Even had they not begged it to do so, it would have been compelled

before long to intervene, for Tafnakhti was already on his way to

attack it; Piônkki charged Luâmarsakni and Pu-arama, the generals he had

already stationed in the Thebaid, to hold Tafnakhti in check, till he

was able to get together the remainder of his army and descend the Nile

to support them. Their instructions were to spare none of the rebellious

towns, but to “capture their men and their beasts, and their ships on

the river; to allow none of the fellaheen to go out into the fields,

nor any labourer to his labour, but to attack Hermopolis and harass it

daily.” They followed out these orders, though, it would seem, without

result, until the reinforcements from Nubia came up: their movements

then became more actively offensive, and falling on Tafnakhti’s ships,

which were making for Thebes heavily laden with men and stores, they

sunk several of them.

[Illustration: 262.jpg RUINS OF OXYRRHYNCHOS AND THE MODERN TOWN OF

BAHNESA]

Drawn by Boudier, from an engraving in Vivant Denon.

Anxious to profit by this first success, they made straight for

Heracleopolis with a view to relieving it. Tafnakhti, accompanied by the

two kings Namrôti and Auputi, was directing the siege in person; he

had under his command, in addition to contingents from Busiris, Mendès,

Thoth, and Pharbaîthos, all the vassals of Osorkon III., the successor

of Petubastis and titular Pharaoh of the whole country. The Ethiopian

fleet engaged the Egyptian ships at the end of the island of

Heracleopolis, near the mouth of the canal leading from the Nile to the

Bahr-Yusuf.* Tafnakhti was defeated, and the remnants of his squadron

took refuge in Pipuga under cover of his land forces.** At dawn, the

next day, the Ethiopians disembarked and gave battle. The struggle was

long and fierce, but indecisive. Luâmarsakni and Puarama claimed the

victory, but were obliged to effect a retreat on the day following

their so-called success, and when they dropped anchor in the harbour of

Hermopolis, they found that Namrôti had made his way back to the city by

land and forestalled them. Powerless to hold the field without support,

he collected all the men and cattle he could lay hands on, and awaited

the progress of events behind his ramparts. The Ethiopians invested the

town, and wrote to inform Piônkhi of what they had done--not, however,

without some misgiving as to the reception which awaited their

despatches. And sure enough, “His Majesty became enraged thereat, even

as a panther: ‘If they have allowed a remnant of the warriors of the

north to remain, if they have let one of them escape to tell of the

fight, if they make him not to die in their slaughter, then by my life,

by the love of Râ, by the praise of Amon for me, I will myself go down

and overthrow that which Tafnakhti hath done,*** I will compel him to

give up war for ever! Therefore, after celebrating the festivals of the

New Year, when I shall have sacrificed to Amon of [Napata], my father,

in his excellent festival wherein he appears in his procession of the

New Year, when he shall have sent me in peace to look upon the [Theban]

Amon in his festivals at Thebes, and when I shall have carried his image

in procession to Luxor, in the festival celebrated in his honour among

the festivals of Thebes, on the night of the feast appointed in the

Thebaid, established by Râ at the creation, when I have led him in the

procession and brought him unto his throne, on the day for introducing

the god, even the second of Athyr, then will I make the enemy taste the

savour of my claws.’”

* The ancient geographers looked upon the nome of

Heraoleopolis as a large island, its southern boundary

being, probably, the canal of Harabshent: the end of the

island, which the Egyptians called “the forepart of

Khninsu,” was probably Harabshent and its environs.

** Pi-puga is probably El-Fokâ, on the Nile, to the north of

Harabshent.

*** The king does not mention his adversary by name in the

text; he is content to indicate him by a pronoun in the

third person--“that which he hath done... then will I make

him taste,” etc.

The generals did their very utmost to appease their master’s wrath

before he appeared on the scene. They told off a force to keep watch

over Hermopolis while they themselves marched against the nome of Uabu;

they took Oxyrrhynchos by storm, with “the fury of a water-spout,” and

informed the king of this achievement; but “his heart was not softened

thereby.” They crossed over to the right bank; they crushed the people

of the north under the walls of Tatehni,* they forced the walls of the

town with the battering-ram, and killed many of the inhabitants, amongst

others a son of Tafnakhti, whose body they sent to the king; but “his

heart was not softened thereby.”

They then pushed on as far as Haït Bonua** and sacked it, but still

failed to regain favour. On the 9th of Thoth, Piônkhi came down to

Thebes, and after hasty attendance at the services to Amon, went to

rejoin the vanguard of his army under the walls of Hermopolis.

* The modern Tehneh, on the right bank of the Nile, a little

below Minieh.

** Hâit-Bonu, or Hâbonu, is the Hipponon of the Greco-Roman

geographers.

[Illustration: 266.jpg KING NAMRÔTI LEADING A HORSE TO PIÔNKHI]

Drawn by Faucher-Gudin, from an impression of the stele in

the Gizeh Museum.

“No sooner had his Majesty quitted the cabin of his ship, than the

horses were harnessed and the charioteers in their places; the fear of

his Majesty spread even to the Nomads of Asia, and all hearts trembled

before him.” Piônkhi drove back the enemy behind their walls, pitched

his tent to the south-west of the city, threw up earth-works, and

built terraces so as to place his bowmen and sling-ers on a level

with the battlements of its towers. At the end of three days, Namrôti,

finding himself hard pressed on every side, resolved to surrender. He

sent envoys to Piônkhi laden with rich presents, and despatched Queen

Nsitentmahît after them, to beg for mercy from the women who had

accompanied the Ethiopian, his wives, concubines, daughters, or royal

sisters. Their entreaties were graciously received, and Namrôti ventured

to come in person, leading a horse with his right hand and shaking in

his left a sistrum of gold and lapis-lazuli; he knelt down and presented

with his salutations the long train of gifts which had gone before him.

Piônkhi visited the temple of Thoth, and there, amidst the acclamations

of soldiers and priests, offered up the customary sacrifices.

[Illustration: 267.jpg RUINS OF THE TEMPLE OF THOTH, AT HERMOPOLIS THE

GREAT]

Drawn by Boudier, from an engraving in Vivant Denon. The

portico was destroyed about 1820 by the engineers who

constructed the sugar refinery at Rodah, and now only a few

shapeless fragments of it remain.

He then made his way to the palace and inspected its courts, chambers,

treasury, and storehouses, and reviewed the whole household, including

even Namrôti’s own wives and daughters, though “he turned not his face

towards any one of them.” He next went on to the stud-farms, and was

indignant to find that the horses had suffered from hunger during the

siege. Thoroughbreds were probably somewhat scarce at Napata, and he

had, no doubt, reckoned on obtaining new blood and a complete relay

of chargers from the Egyptian stables; his chances of doing so seemed

likely to vanish if brood mares and stallions had everywhere been

debilitated by the hardships of war. He reserved a part of the booty for

himself, handed over the balance to the priests of Amon at Karnak, and

also, before he left, received tribute from Heracleopolis. Pefzââbastît

brought him horses, the pick of his stables, slaves laden with gold

and silver and precious stones; then burying his face in the dust,

he offered worship to his liberator: “Hell had swallowed me up, I was

plunged into darkness, and lo, now a light has been given me. Since I

have found no man to love me in the day of adversity, or to stand by me

in the day of battle, save only thee, O victorious king, who hast torn

away the night from above me, I will be thy servant, I and all my house,

and Khninsu shall pay tribute into thy treasury. For, as to thee, thou

art Harmakhis, chief of the imperishable stars, thou art king, even as

he is king, and even as he doth not destroy himself, neither shalt thou

destroy thyself!”

The downfall of Khmunu led all who might still have shown resistance

in Middle Egypt to lay down their arms also. The fortress of

Pisakhmakhpirrî* dominated the gorges of Lahunît, and thus commanded the

entrance to the Fayum; but the son of Tafnakhti agreed to surrender it,

provided he were allowed to march out with the honours of war.

* This fortress, which bears a name compounded with that of

Osorkon I., must have been rebuilt by that monarch on the

site of an earlier fort; the new name remained in use under

the XXIInd and XXIIIth dynasties, after which the old one

reappears. It is Illahun, where Petrie discovered the

remains of a flourishing town of the Bubastite epoch.

Shortly after, Maîtumu threw open its gates, and its example was

followed by Titauî; at Maîtumu there was rioting among the Egyptians in

the streets, one party wishing to hold out, the other to surrender, but

in the end the latter had their way.* Piônkhi discharged his priestly

duties wherever he went, and received the local taxes, always being

careful to reserve a tenth for the treasury of Amon-Râ; the fact that

his army was kept under rigid control, and that he showed great clemency

to the vanquished, helped largely to conciliate those who were not

bound by close ties of interest to the cause of Tafnakhti. On reaching

Memphis, Piônkhi at once had recourse to the persuasive methods which

had hitherto served him so well, and entered into negotiations with the

garrison. “Shut not yourselves up in forts, and fight not against the

Upper Country,** for Shu the god of creation, when I enter, he entereth,

and when I go out, he goeth out, and none may repel my attacks. I will

present offerings to Phtah and to the divinities of the White Wall,

I will honour Sokari in his mysterious coffer, I will contemplate

Eîsânbuf,*** then I will return from thence in peace. If ye will trust

in me, Memphis shall be prosperous and healthy, even the children shall

not cry therein. Behold the nomes of the South; not a soul has been

massacred there, saving only the impious who blasphemed God, and these

rebels have been executed.”

* Maritumu, or Maîtumu, is the modern Meîdum, associated in

the inscription with the characteristic epithet, Pisokari-

Nibu-Suazu, or “temple of Sokari, master of the

transfiguration.” Titauî lay exactly on the frontier between

Upper and Lower Egypt--hence its name, which signifies

“commanding the two regions;” it was in the Memphite nome,

and Brugsch identifies it with the Greek city of Acanthos,

near Dahshur, but this position appears to me to be too

close to Memphis and too far from the boundary of the nome;

I should prefer to place Titauî at Kafr el-Ayat or

thereabouts.

** I.e. against Piônkhi, who was master of the Upper

Country, that is, of Thebes and Ethiopia, and the forces

from the whole of the valley to the south of Memphis who

accompanied him.

*** Lit., “He who is on the South of his Wall,” a name given

to one of the quarters of Memphis, and afterwards applied to

the god Phtah, who was worshipped in that quarter.

This eloquence, however, was of no avail. A detachment of archers,

sailors, and engineers sent to make a reconnaissance of the harbour was

taken by surprise and routed with loss, and on the following night

Tafnakhti suddenly made his appearance on the spot. He had the 8000 men

who were defending it paraded before him, and made them a speech, in

which he pointed out the great natural strength of the position, the

stoutness of the walls and the abundance of provisions; he then mounted

his horse, and making his way a second time through the enemy’s

outposts, headed straight for the Delta in order to levy reinforcements

there. The next day, Piônkhi went in person to examine the approaches of

the city in which his ancestors had once been throned. There was a full

Nile, and the river came right up to the walls. He sailed close in along

the whole of the eastern front, and landed on the north, much vexed and

discomfited at finding it so strongly fortified. Even the common

soldiers were astonished, and began to discuss among themselves the

difficulties of the undertaking with a certain feeling of

discouragement. It would be necessary, they declared, to open a regular

siege, “to make an inclined plane leading to the city, throw up-

earthworks against its walls, bind ladders, set up masts and erect spars

all around it.” Piônkhi burst into a rage when these remarks were

repeated to him: a siege in set form would have been a most serious

enterprise, and would have allowed the allied princes time to get

together fresh troops. He drove his ships full speed against the line of

boats anchored in the harbour, and broke through it at the first onset;

his sailors then scaled the bank and occupied the houses which

overlooked it. Reinforcements concentrated on this point gradually

penetrated into the heart of the city, and after two days’ fighting the

garrison threw down their arms. The victor at once occupied the temples

to save them from pillage: he then purified Memphis with water and

natron, ascended in triumph to the temple of Phtah, and celebrated there

those rites which the king alone was entitled to perform. The other

fortresses in the neighbourhood surrendered without further hesitation.

King Auputi of Tentramu,* prince Akaneshu,** and prince Petisis tendered

the homage of their subjects in person, and the other sovereigns of the

Delta merely waited for a demonstration in force on the part of the

Ethiopians before following their example.

* Probably the original of the statue discovered by Naville

at Tel-el-Yahudîyeh. Tentramu and Taânu, the cities of

Auputi, are perhaps identical with the biblical Elim (Exod.

xvi. 1) and the Daneon Portus of Pliny on the Red Sea, but

Naville prefers to identify Daneon with the Tonu of the

_Berlin Papyrus No. 1_. I believe that we ought to look for

the kingdom of Auputi in the neighbourhood of Menzaleh, near

Tanis.

** Akaneshu ruled over Sebennytos and in the XVIIth nome.

Naville discovered at Samannud the statue of one of his

descendants, a king of the same name, perhaps his grandson,

who was prince of Sebennytos in the time of Psammetichus I.

Piônkhi crossed the Nile and marched in state to Heliopolis, there to

receive the royal investiture.

He offered up prayers at the various holy places along the route, such

as the sanctuary of Tumu at Khriâhu and the temple of the Ennead who

dwelt in the cavern from which the Northern Nile was supposed to spring;

he then crossed over Mount Ahu, bathed his face in the reputed source

of the river, and at length penetrated into the dwelling-place of Râ.

He ascended the steps leading to the great chapel in order that he might

there “see Râ in Hâît-Banbonu even himself. All unattended, he drew the

bolt, threw open the doors, contemplated his father Râ in Hâît-Banbonu,

adjusted Ra’s boat Mâdît and the Saktit of Shu, then closed the doors

again, affixed a seal of clay, and impressed it with the royal signet.”

He had thus submitted his conduct for the approval of the god in whom

all attributes of royalty were vested, and the god had legitimatised his

claims to universal rule: he was henceforth the master, not merely _de

jure_ but _de facto_ as well, and the kings who had hitherto declined to

recognise him were now obliged to bow reverently before his authority.

Osorkon was the first to submit, and did so before the close of

Piônkhi’s stay at Heliopolis; when the latter pitched his camp near

Kahani* in the Athribite nome, the nobles of the Eastern Delta, both

small and great, came one after another with their followers; among

them Patinifi of Pisapti, Paimau of Busiris, Pabîsa of Khriâhu and of

Pihâpi,** besides a dozen others.

* Kahani is, perhaps, the modern Kaha, some distance to the

north of Qaliub.

** Pisapti stood on the present site of Shaft-el-ïïineh.

Khriâhu, as we know, formed part of the Heliopolitan nome,

and is, very possibly, to be identified with Babylon of

Egypt, the Postât of the Arabs; Pihâpi was a place not far

from the supposed source of the Southern Nile.

He extended his favour to all alike, merely stipulating that they should

give him the best of their horses, and undertake to keep careful watch

over the prosperity of their stud farms. But Tafnakhti still held out,

and seemed determined to defy him to the end; he had set fire to his

palace and taken refuge in the islands on the river, and had provided

a hiding-place for himself at Masudît among the marshes on the coast

in case of final defeat. A victory gained over him by the Ethiopian

generals suddenly induced him to sue for peace. He offered to disband

his men and pay tribute, provided he was guaranteed undisturbed

possession of Sais and of the western districts of the Delta; he

refused, however, to sue for pardon in person, and asked that an envoy

should be sent to receive his oath of allegiance in the temple of Nit.

Though deserted by his brother princes and allies, he still retained

sufficient power to be a thorn in his conqueror’s side; his ultimate

overthrow was certain, but it would have entailed many a bloody

struggle, while a defeat might easily have shaken the fidelity of the

other feudatory kings, and endangered the stability of the new dynasty.

Piônkhi, therefore, accepted the terms offered him without modification,

and asked for no guarantee beyond the oath taken in the presence of

the gods. News was brought him about this time that Cynopolis and

Aphroditopolis had at last thrown open their gates, and accordingly he

summoned his vassals for the last time to his camp near Athribis. With

the exception of Tafnakhti, they all obeyed the call, including two

minor kings of Upper and two of Lower Egypt, together with barons of

lesser rank; but of these, Namrôti alone was admitted to the royal

apartments, because he alone was circumcised and ate no fish; after

this the camp was broken up, and the Ethiopians set out on their return

journey southwards. Piônkhi may well have been proud of the result of

this campaign, both for himself and for his country. The empire of the

Pharaohs, which had for the last hundred and fifty years been divided,

was now re-established from the confluence of the Niles to the shores

of the Mediterranean, but it was no longer Egypt that benefited by the

change. It was now, after many years of slavery, the turn of Ethiopia

to rule, and the seat of power was transferred from Thebes or Memphis to

Napata. As a matter of fact, the fundamental constitution of the kingdom

underwent no great modification; it had merely one king the more to rule

over it--not a stranger, as we are often tempted to conclude, when we

come to measure these old-world revolutions by our modern standards

of patriotism, but a native of the south, who took the place of those

natives of the north who had succeeded one another on the throne since

the days of Smendes. In fact, this newly crowned son of Râ lived a very

long way off; he had no troops of his own further north than Siut,

and he had imposed his suzerainty on the rival claimants and reigning

princes without thereby introducing any change in the constitution

of the state. In tendering their submission to him, the heads of the

different nomes had not the slightest intention of parting with their

liberty; they still retained it, even though nominally dependent, and

continued, as in the past, to abuse it without scruple. Namrôti was king

at Khmunu, Pefzââbastît at Khninsu, Auputi at Tentramu, and Osorkon

III. at Bubastis; the prestige investing the Tanite race persisted so

effectively that the annalists give to the last-named precedence over

the usurpers of the Ethiopian dynasty; the Tanites continued to be the

incarnate representatives of legitimate power, and when Osorkon III.

died, in 732, it was his son Psamutis who was regarded as the Lord of

Egypt. Tafnakhti had, in his defeat, gained formal recognition of his

royalty. He was no longer a mere successful adventurer, a hero of the

hour, whose victories were his only title-deeds, whose rights rested

solely on the argument of main force. Piônkhi, in granting him amnesty,

had conferred official investiture on him and on his descendants.

Henceforth his rule at Sais was every whit as legitimate as that of

Osorkon at Bubastis, and he was not slow in furnishing material proof of

this, for he granted himself cartouches, the uraeus, and all the other

insignia of royalty. These changes must have been quickly noised abroad

throughout Asia. Commercial intercourse between Syria and Egypt was

maintained as actively as ever, and the merchant caravans and fleets

exported with regularity the news of events as well as the natural

products of the soil or of industry. The tidings of an Ethiopian

conquest and of the re-establishment of an undivided empire in the

valley of the Nile, coming as they did at the very moment when the first

effects of the Assyrian revival began to be so keenly felt, could not

fail to attract the attention and arouse the hopes of Syrian statesmen.

The Philistines, who had never entirely released themselves from the

ties which bound them to the Pharaohs of the Delta, felt no repugnance

at asking for a renewal of their former protection.

[Illustration: 276.jpg KING TAFNAKHTI PRESENTS A FIELD TO TUMU AND TO

BASTIT]

Drawn by Boudier, from Mallet’s photograph of the stele in

the Museum at Athens.

As for the Phoenicians, the Hebrews, Edom, Moab, Ammon, and Damascus,

they began to consider whether they had not here, in Africa, among the

members of a race favourably disposed towards them by the memories of

the past and by its ambition, hereditary allies against Nineveh. The

fact that Egypt was torn by domestic dissensions and divided into a

score of rival principalities in no way diminished their traditional

admiration for its wealth or their confidence in its power; Assyria

itself was merely an agglomeration of turbulent provinces, vassal

cities, and minor kingdoms, artificially grouped round the ancient

domain of Assur, and yet the convulsions by which it was periodically

shaken had not prevented it from developing into the most formidable

engine of war that had ever threatened the peace of Asia. The African

hosts, whether led by ordinary generals or by a king of secondary

rank, formed none the less a compact army well fitted by numbers and

organisation to hold its own against any forces which Tiglath-pileser

might put into the field; and even should the supreme Pharaoh be

unwilling to throw the full weight of his authority into the balance,

yet an alliance with one of the lesser kings, such as the lord of Sais

or of Bubastis, would be of inestimable assistance to any one fortunate

enough to secure it. It is true that, in so far as the ultimate issue

was concerned, there was little to be gained by thus pitting the two

great powers together and persuading one to fight against the other;

the victor must, in the long run, remain master alike of those who had

appealed for help and of those who had fought against him, and if Egypt

emerged triumphant, there would be nothing for it but to accept her

supremacy. In either event, there could be no question of independence;

it was a choice between the hegemony of Egypt or that of Assyria.

From the moment that Tiglath-pileser had made his appearance on the

northern horizon, the nations of Southern Syria had instinctively looked

to Pharaoh for aid. There seems to have been an Egyptian faction in

Samaria, even during the disorders which broke out after the death of

Jeroboam II., and perhaps it was a hope of overcoming it easily which

led Menahem of his own accord to invoke the still remote suzerainty

of Nineveh, after the fall of Unki in 738;* later on, when Pekah had

assassinated Pekahiah and entered into alliance with Eezin, he adopted

the view of those who saw no hope of safety save from the banks of the

Nile, his only reason for doing so being, apparently, because the

kings of the fallen dynasty had received support from the valley of

the Tigris. Hosea continually reproached his countrymen with this

vacillating policy, and pointed out the folly of it: “Ephraim is like

a silly dove without understanding; they call unto Egypt, they go unto

Assyria; when they shall go I will spread My net upon them,” said the

Eternal.**

* The existence of an Egyptian faction at this period has

been admitted by Kittel. Winckler has traced to the Arabian

or Idumæan Muzri everything previously referred to Egypt.

His arguments seem to me to be, in many cases, convincing,

as I shall point out where necessary, but I think he carries

his theory too far when he systematically excludes Egypt and

puts Muzri in its place. Egypt, even in its decadent state,

was a far more important power than the Arabian Muzri, and

it seems unreasonable to credit it with such a limited share

in the politics of the time. I cannot believe that any other

power is intended in most of those passages in the Hebrew

writings and Assyrian inscriptions in which the words

Mizraîm and Muzri occur.

** Hos. vii. 11, 12.

They were to be given up to Assyria and dispersed, and while some were

to go into Assur and eat unclean food, Ephraim was to return into Egypt;

“for, lo, they are gone away from destruction, yet Egypt shall gather

them up, Memphis shall bury them.” * Nevertheless, they persisted in

negotiating with Egypt, and though there was as yet no formal alliance

between Samaria and Sais or Tanis, their relations were so close that no

enemy of Israel could look for protection from Psamuti or his vassals.

Ahaz had, therefore, nothing to hope from this quarter, and was

compelled by the force of circumstances to throw himself into the arms

of Assyria, if he decided to call in outside aid at all. His prophets,

like those of Pekah, strenuously forbade him to do so, and among them

was one who was beginning to exert a marvellous influence over all

classes of society--Isaiah, the son of Amoz. He had begun his career

in the year that Uzziah died,** and had continued to prophesy without

interruption during the brief reign of Jotham.***

* Hos. ix. 3-6.

** Isa. vi. 1.

*** The fragments which can be assigned to this period now

occur as follows: chap. ii. 2-5 (verses 2-4 are also found

in _Micah_ iv. 1-3, and were, perhaps, borrowed from some

third prophet), ii. 6-22, iii., iv., v. 1-24 (the Parable of

the Vineyard), and lastly, chap, vi., in so far as the

substance is concerned; it seems to have been put into its

present form long after the events.

History of Egypt, Chaldæa, Syria, Babylonia, and Assyria, Volume 7 (of 12) · 第 6 / 9 章