CHAPTER VI

On the 25th November 1642, "It was thought fit, and ordered by the

Lords, that the said office--that is, the Inland Letter Office--shall

be delivered to the Earl of Warwick or his deputies, and that

Burlamachi and his deputies shall, within eight days after serving of

this Order, bring in a particular account upon oath to the Earls Clare

and Bolinbroke, and Lord Grey of Werke and Lord Bruce, of the profits

of that office during all the time of their being in possession of the

same. The lords above mentioned are to make reports to the House, that

thereby the Earl of Warwick may have the profits of that office, to be

paid to him by the parties aforesaid; and the posts and their agents

are hereby commanded to bring the mails, with letters, to such place as

the Earl of Warwick shall appoint." Another Order, dated 2nd December

1642, was issued confirming the foregoing Order, and also giving

authority to the earl, in the event of the country postmasters refusing

to carry or deliver up the mails as directed, "to seize upon the mails,

and to put the postmasters out of their places, until they conform

themselves unto the Order of the House." It was further ordered that

all colonels, captains, justices, constables, and others, His Majesty's

officers, should aid and assist in the execution of this Order.

On the 9th December, the House of Lords seem to have issued a

peremptory Order to Burlamachi to produce the "books of accompts for

receipt of the profits of the Inland Letter Office, with the warrants

and acquittances," etc. But this Burlamachi neglected to do, and,

in consequence of his contumacy, the House make a further Order on

the 21st December to the effect "that the Sheriffs of London or

their deputies shall, by virtue of this Order, seize the said books

of accompts, etc., and send them to the Clerk of the Parliament on

Saturday, the 24th present." The Lords at the same time confirm the

previous Orders of the 25th November and 2nd December, "for that it

appears that the possession of the Inland Letter Office, settled by the

Order of this House on the Earl of Warwick, has been interrupted by

divers refractory and obstinate persons." The Lords further give Order

"that all colonels, mayors, sheriffs, and other officers shall have

full power and authority to seize all mails of letters in all places,

both coming in and going out, and to deliver the same to the Earl of

Warwick or his deputies at his office near the Royal Exchange, London,

and this Order to be their sufficient warrant."

Events were developing very rapidly at this period, for, on the 24th

December 1642, Burlamachi was in custody for not bringing in the books

of account already referred to, and on that date he petitions for his

discharge. He was not, however, then released.

On the following day, 25th December, a brief return was made by

Burlamachi of the revenue and expenditure of the Inland Letter Office,

from 4th August 1640 to 25th December 1641, as follows:--Moneys

received, £8363; moneys expended, £4867; balance in hand, £3496,

whereof £1400 has been paid to the Secretary of State. Of the other

£2000, Burlamachi states that "those that keep the office are to be

considered for their pains and attendance, which are great," and he

adds something about a probable increase from the Irish correspondence.

On the 29th December, Burlamachi draws up a fresh petition, this time

to the effect that his accounts may be audited by one of His Majesty's

auditors, and he again prays that his liberty may be granted to him. On

the 31st December, an Order is issued from the House of Lords requiring

that "Philip Burlamachi shall within eight days account upon oath to

John Worfield, the City Auditor, for all moneys derived from the Inland

Letter Office since the sequestration, and how the same have been

disposed of, upon which Mr. Worfield is to report to this House."

The precise issue of these varied proceedings cannot readily be made

out; but it would seem that at this time, 1643, the Foreign Letter

Office remained in possession of Witherings, and that the Inland Letter

Office was handed over to the Earl of Warwick.

The period from 1642 to 1660 was one full of incident and surprises,

a time when every man had to risk all by declaring himself either

for the King or the Parliament, or remain, if this were possible, in

passive obscurity; and, in the former case, unhappy was the man who

chose the losing side. To men in positions like that of Witherings, the

situation must have been most trying, for however he might strive to

serve the party in power, his proceedings would be open to suspicion.

And so later experience will show.

Leaving Witherings for a moment, we will refer to an officer of the

Post Office who did important service for the king. This was James

Hickes, one of Witherings' clerks, the only member of the staff who

threw his lot in with the royal cause. When, in 1643, Charles held

his Court at Oxford, he was cut off from the service of the postal

system having its centre in London; and he took steps for erecting a

rival post system for his own use. Hickes was ordered by warrant to

"receive and demand from all postmasters on the Western and other

roads obedient to His Majesty, the arrears in their hands due to the

Letter Office; all refusers of the arrears to be dealt with according

to their deserts." He had other directions generally, to the effect

of establishing a system of posts in the West, well affected for the

king, and extending south to Weymouth, from which port to Cherbourg a

weekly service by packet was being set up. More complete instructions

were given to Hickes on the 27th January 1644, as follows:--"Knowing

your experience in the Letter Office, we hereby appoint you to reside

in Weymouth, for the receiving and despatching all packets and

letters coming to your hands, either from Court or any part within

this kingdom,--not possessed by the rebels,--or from beyond seas, and

to receive money for their port, such only excepted as are for His

Majesty's service, or to tax them according to the rules of the Letter

Office; as also to hire one or more passage boats as Sir Nicholas

Crispe, our deputy, shall direct you, taking special care that all

letters passing through the said port, and all passengers and goods

passing in the said passage boats, be duly taken notice of by you,

and all duties paid before you dismiss them, the master of the packet

boat to be answerable to you for the passage money of all goods and

passengers he shall take on board; and generally in this employment to

demean yourself as may be most for His Majesty's service, and the just

benefit of the Letter Office under us, and to observe all directions

you shall receive from us and from the said Sir Nicholas Crispe,

and to render a constant true weekly account of all your receipts

and disbursements to Mr Thomas Nevile at Oxford. And we desire the

Governor, Mayor, constable, etc., of Weymouth, to aid you therein."

Hickes is a somewhat remarkable figure in post-office history. Sometime

before the Restoration he was again employed in the Post Office in

London; and in a petition addressed to the king in 1666, he describes

the services rendered by him during the period above mentioned. In that

memorial he says that he then "carried personally His Majesty's foreign

letters and packets to Oxford, with the hazard of his life"; that "in

the year 1643 he was committed to prison by Corbett the traitor, and

in great danger of being tried for his life by the unjust laws then

practised, for holding correspondence with Mr. Secretary Nicholas in

His Majesty's service, and, having with much difficulty escaped to

Oxford, he was employed in several expeditions and employments of

trust, by both the then Principal Secretaries of State; and settled at

Weymouth to manage two packet boats, for conveyance of His Majesty's

despatches to and from foreign parts, as will appear by their several

commissions, and under his said Majesty's royal hand and signet;

during which time he exposed his wife and children to the charity of

others, himself to daily dangers, and his small fortune to an utter

diminution." "Corbett the traitor" referred to is no doubt one of the

regicides afterwards taken in Holland, and who was hanged and quartered

at Tyburn on the 19th April 1662. His full name was Miles Corbett.

About the year 1644, Thomas Witherings must have been, or considered to

be, a man of a respectable estate, for, according to the proceedings

of the Committee for the Advance of Money, he was, on the 18th June of

that year, assessed for a contribution of £800. Now, as the assessment

was based upon one-twentieth of real estate, and one-fifth of personal

estate, the sum assessed represents a condition of fair wealth. The

full amounts of these assessments were seldom, however, exacted, and

Witherings seems to have been let off after making payments amounting

to about £550.

By an Order in Parliament of 23rd February 1649, the appointment of

Robert Earl of Warwick as Lord High Admiral and Lord Warden of the

Cinque Ports was revoked; and on the same day, at the the Council of

State, a request was made that Mr. Prideaux should come to the Council

to settle stages for all the posts. From this it may be inferred

that the posts also had been taken out of the Earl of Warwick's

hands. Warwick's brother, Lord Holland, being dissatisfied with the

proceedings of the Parliamentary party, had gone over to the King's

side, and taken active service against the Parliament, on account of

which it may probably have been considered unwise to continue the

Earl of Warwick at the head of the Inland Posts. On the 29th March,

the Council appointed Sir Henry Vane, Alderman Wilson, and Messrs.

Heveningham, Holland, and Robinson to be a committee on the postal

service. Things at the Post Office were becoming very unsettled. On

the 27th March, by Order of the Council, the mails were that night to

be searched for the book called the _New Chains_; on the 5th April

instructions were issued that any person named Edward Broun, calling

for letters at the post office, was to be detained; in the same month

Mr. Witherings was ordered to prosecute "Wilkes" for the seditious

speeches mentioned by him. The Council of State gave orders, on the 8th

June, to stay all letters brought to the post, directed to Mons. de la

Caille, Marchand Français, démeurant à la Haye, and to bring them to

the Council. And in the following month the Council gave further orders

that all letters which might be thought to contain anything prejudicial

to the State should be examined. Later, complaints were made against

Captain Stephen Rich, for miscarriages in the execution of his place as

postmaster in not transporting the State's packets between Holyhead

and Dublin. Rich, it appears, resided at Dublin, and the matter was

referred for investigation to the authorities in that city. In a letter

from a lady in London to her brother at Rochelle, dated 20th February

1650, the following account of the state of the posts is given:--"The

jealousies of the time are great, and consequently the danger of

writing; all packets are stopped, which is the reason you do not hear

from me, for a high court of justice is erecting, and all intelligence

with the king or his ministers is voted treason." These particulars

exhibit something of the business that was proceeding in the Post

Office.

In 1649, a crisis occurred in Withering's official career. On the 2nd

April of that year, information was laid against him "that he had

assisted Lord Goring in the late insurrection in Essex (1648), by going

into arms and setting out three armed men,--one with a horse,--for

which he was sequestered in Essex." Shortly thereafter orders were

issued for the seizure of all his money, plate, goods, rents, debts,

and estate, and the Essex Commissioners were required to send up copies

of all depositions against him. In May he petitioned to be freed

from further trouble, alleging that he had always faithfully served

Parliament. He had previously asked for the charge against him, and

went down to the County Commissioners, who unanimously agreed that

there was no cause for the seizure or sequestration of his estate.

Thereupon orders were given "that he be discharged, and no further

proceedings taken against him."

About this time Witherings had a serious illness, brought on, in all

probability, by the worries with which he was surrounded. He thought

proper now to make his will, and in the preamble he refers to his

indisposition in the following terms. He states that "he was taken

upon a sudden with a dizziness in his head, and being thereupon very

ill-disposed in body, yet well and perfect in memory, doth dispose, in

case of mortality, his will to be," etc. Witherings was owner of the

estate called "Nelmes," near Hornchurch, Essex, where was a fine old

house, which still remains, and is inhabited to the present day.

In 1649, one of the packet boats plying between Holyhead and Dublin,

named the _Patrick_, of Waterford, was taken by the Irish; but it was

afterwards retaken by Capt. Fearmes, of the _President_, and restored

to its owner, the salvage due to the mariners being paid by the State.

In 1650, authority was given for employing a post barque for the

conveyance of letters, etc., to ply between Liverpool and Carlingford

or Carrickfergus. The boat proposed was the galiot _Robert_, and

the sum to be paid for its use, £11 a month. About the same time,

two post barques were settled to ply between Milford Haven and the

headquarters of the Lord-Lieutenant of Ireland, to carry letters "from

Attorney-General Prideaux or any other public Minister." The cost

of maintaining the packet boats between Holyhead and Dublin at this

period was £9, 6s. 8d. each per month. In order to keep up a constant

correspondence between the forces in Ulster and the standing army, a

packet boat was also ordered to ply between Ulster and Carlisle.

An important step was taken, in respect of the posts, by the Council

of State, upon a paper given in by the Attorney-General, on the 14th

March 1650. The Council ordered that their opinion be reported to

Parliament, that, "as affairs now stand, it is safe and fit that

the office of Postmaster shall be in the sole power and disposal of

Parliament." On the 21st March, an Order was passed in Parliament,

"that the offices of Postmasters, Inland and Foreign, ought to be in

the sole power and disposal of the Parliament. That it be referred to

the Council of State to consider of the offices of Postmasters, and of

all the interests of those persons who claim any, how the same may be

settled for the advantage and safety of the Commonwealth, and to take

order for the present management thereof." Two days later, the Council

of State resolved that Mr. Prideaux, the Attorney-General, should

undertake the management of the Inland Posts, and to be accountable to

the Commonwealth for the profits quarterly. And in further proceedings

of the Council of the 5th April, Sir William Armyne was instructed to

inform the House of the arrangement. Witherings would appear not to

have been disturbed in his position of Postmaster for Foreign Parts at

this time; for on the 9th May the Council issued a warrant to him and

the other masters of the letter packet boats, "not to carry any male

passengers to France or Flanders until further orders." And, again, on

10th July, the Council of State ordered Witherings to forbear paying

any money to William Jessop or Benedict Moore, "to the use of the Earl

of Warwick, or Lord Rich, or to Col. Charles Fleetwood, until further

order."

On 29th June 1650, the Council of State issued orders to Serjeant

Dendy (Serjeant-at-arms to the Council) and his assistant to make a

raid upon the country mails coming to and going from London, in the

following terms:--"You are to repair to some post stage twenty miles

from London, on the road towards York; seize the letter mail going

outward, and all other letters upon the mail rider, and present them,

by one of yourselves, to Council; the other shall then ride to the next

stage, and seize the mail coming inwards, and bring the letters to

Council, searching all persons that ride with the mail, or any other

that ride post without warrant, and bring them before Council or the

Commissioners for the examination; all officers, civil and military, to

be assistants." Like orders were also given in respect of the mails on

the Chester and Western roads.

The seizure of the mails was doubtless due to a desire on the part of

the Council to discover such persons as might be holding correspondence

with the enemy. The vigilance of the Council continued, for, on 4th

December, the Deputy Governor of Dover was required to examine the

master of the post barque, lately come over, as to his bringing a

person who (as he had been previously informed) "was dangerous, and

brought commissions and letters from the enemy." And, again, on the

13th May 1651, the Council of State gave order to the Committee of

Examinations, "to inquire into the opening of Capt. Bishop's letter

between England and Scotland, and to write such persons as they think

fit for the discovery of the same. The Attorney-General to bring in

a list of the persons employed as postmasters upon the several roads

throughout this nation, with their character." "To write the Lord

General to cause an inquiry to be made after the persons who presumed

to break open some letters directed to him, and, if he finds any of

them to be near the southern parts, he is to give notice thereof to

Council, that they may prosecute them."

Again, on the 21st August 1651, the Council gave directions that "the

packet brought in this day from the northern parts be searched before

the letters be delivered out." These are specimens of the measures

taken at the period in question with the view of preventing the

post-office service being used in the interest of the King's party.

On the 10th March 1651, the Council of State gave order for the

revival of a Committee, which was set up the year before, to consider

the business of the Foreign Post. They were to send for Mr. Witherings

and "confer with him as to what money he had on hand that was formerly

wont to be paid to the Earl of Warwick." It is not clear whether this

inquiry had reference to any supposed irregularity on Witherings' part,

or merely to the question of moneys claimed by the earl. Be this as

it may, a fresh storm was soon to break over Witherings' head. In the

month of June 1651, the charges of delinquency of which he had been

acquitted in 1649 were levelled at him in an aggravated form. The

information laid against him was to the effect "that when Oxford was a

King's garrison, he compounded with delinquents, and paid moneys for

them, by order of Sir Edw. Sydenham. That in the Essex insurrection he

sent a man and horse to Lord Goring, and was in person at Bow Bridge

when held by the enemy. That he was at many private meetings at the

Hoope Tavern, Leadenhall Street, plotting about the revolt of Capt.

Batten and the fleet (1648). That he conveyed moneys into France for

the relief of Cavaliers, some of which was taken. That he concealed

an annuity of £1200, and several sums due to the State which are in

his custody, and paid several sums to Sir Edw. Sydenham, a delinquent,

contrary to the Order of the Council of State. That he is very familiar

with delinquents, stands bound for them, conceals their letters,

and conveys letters and intelligence to them beyond seas." A few

days later, witnesses were summoned to appear against him, including

Sir Edward and Lady Sydenham. Sir Edward was a county neighbour of

Witherings, residing at Gidea Hall, Hornchurch, and is said to have

been a moderate Royalist. After full hearing, Witherings was finally

dismissed from the charges on the 25th July 1651. It is somewhat

difficult to fit in all the events connected with these prosecutions

owing to the conflicting dates under which they are recorded. But

this much appears, that one of the processes took place before the

Committee of Essex, that it continued over a period of seven months,

and that Witherings carried thirty witnesses from London to Chelmsford

in support of his case. Witherings tells us that Wilkes, "with the

assistance of some butchers whom Witherings had sued for great sums,"

prosecuted him maliciously, and that Wilkes and others offered from

£20 to £50 to witnesses to swear against Witherings. This man Wilkes

seems to have been a troublesome fellow, for Witherings relates that

"Wilkes was committed prisoner by Parliament for furnishing horses to

the enemy," and that, "after his enlargement, he accused Parliament of

being rogues, villains, and devils, and declared he hoped to see the

destruction of them all; for which words he was indicted, by order of

the Council." Witherings, in his defence, and as showing his attachment

to the party then in power, makes mention of the fact that he had been

"very serviceable to Parliament, contributing £1000 on the going away

of the Lord-Lieutenant for Ireland." The indebtedness of the butchers,

above referred to, may have had its origin in sales of cattle reared or

fed on Witherings' property in Essex; or it may be that he traded in

cattle, for he seems to have carried on business in a variety of ways.

It is recorded of him that, about this period, he and several other

merchants of London contracted with the Navy Commissioners "for the

supply of provisions at London, Dover, etc., and at Kinsale, for the

Navy, at the rate of 8d. a day per man at sea, and 7d. when in harbour,

the State bearing all charges of transport."

Witherings did not long survive these unsuccessful attacks of his

enemies, for on the 28th September, two months after his acquittal,

he was stricken down by death. He was one of the two elders of the

church at Hornchurch; and on the day mentioned, being Sunday, whilst

proceeding to service, he died suddenly on the way. His remains were

laid under the chancel of the church, and a mural tablet was erected

to his memory. This has since been removed from the chancel to the

north-east side of the entrance immediately under the old tower.

The inscription upon the tablet is as follows:--

"Sacred to the Memory of Thomas Witheringe, Esqr., Chiefe Postmaster

of Greate Britaine, and foreigne parts, second to none for unfathomed

poilesicy, unparralled sagacius and divining Genius; witness his

great correspondence in all parts of ye Christian World.

"Here lies interred who God from hence did call,

By speedy summons, to his funerall.

Upon his sacred day, the world by Love

May judge it was to sing his praise above.

When on his way unto God's house Love brings

Him swifter passage upon Angell's wings

Full spread with zeal wherein his soul doth fly

To Mercies throne in twinkling of an eye.

This Epitaph may all him justly give,

Who dies in Christ he dies not but to live.

In Christo mori est vivere.

Obiit Anno. Dni. 1651, Ætat. Suæ 55."

In _Memories of Old Romford_, it is stated that Witherings was a

Puritan; in any case his profession in later life seems to have been

that of a Protestant. It may be that the charge of being a papist in

his earlier years was but a base invention of his enemies. Reference

has previously been made to a suggestion that Witherings had been a

mercer in London in his earlier life. We find, on inquiry, that one

Thomas Witherings was admitted a member of the Mercer's Company, by

redemption, on the 15th February 1625. This means that he purchased

his admission; but it does not follow that he was a mercer in the

present meaning of the word.

From the conflicting statements made in regard to Witherings during the

course of his official life, it is perhaps now impossible to arrive

at any true estimate of his character. He lived in a troublous time,

surrounded by enemies covetous of his office, and during a period

of civil war, when to steer a course free from strife and collision

would be impossible. He must have been a man of originality and of

persevering disposition. In a negative sense, it may be said that he

was no tin-plate man, devoid of stability, reflecting only the opinions

of others, and capable of being cut into any shape by the scissors of

expediency; he was possessed of fight and determination, and must have

lived a trying and exciting life. What his pursuits or predilections

were, apart from business, it is not now possible to determine. During

his official career he was twice sequestered in his office; once he was

put in prison; twice his property was seized; and twice he was declared

to be, or was charged with being, a delinquent. The probabilities are

that the worries and anxieties of office thrust him into his grave, for

he died a comparatively young man. From the point of view of work done,

he has some claim to be regarded as an early Rowland Hill; it was he

who first organised the inland posts generally in Britain for the use

of the public; though it is to the credit of the deputy postmasters on

the road from London to the West of England, that they had anticipated

Witherings by several years in setting up a horse post for the benefit

of the people on that line of road. He was the forerunner of a long

line of able, zealous, and accomplished men, whose lives have been

spent in, and have adorned, the Post Office for two centuries and

a half, whose work has been swallowed up in the ever-advancing tide

of improvement, and whose names, when their work was done, have

disappeared from view and have hardly left an echo behind.

The Early History of the Post in Grant and Farm · 第 6 / 12 章