COAL AND COAL.

The Government should sample and certify coal. We do this as to wheat

and meat; it is just as necessary to avoid injustice in the case of

coal, and it is thoroughly practicable. The public should know the kind

of coal it is buying, because it should buy the coal it needs. There

need be no prohibition against the mining or selling of any coal,[4] but

coal should sell in terms of its capacity to deliver heat. Some coal

that is only a pint bottle is selling as a quart bottle. And the quart

is hurt by the competition of the pint. A bill to effect such fuel

inspection has been drafted and will be presented to Congress. It is not

a bill commanding anything, but rather gives to those who are willing an

opportunity to have their product inspected and attested and thus

acquire merit in the eye of the world as against those who are not

willing to subject their coal to the official test tube. Coal is coal in

the sense of the classic traffic classification. Coal is, however, not

always coal, nor is it altogether coal when put to the pragmatic test of

the furnace. If such a bill were passed it would promote the interests

of those who schedule their price upon the merit of their goods and make

against the hauling of slate and dirt, its storage and handling under an

assumed name. The plan is not to punish the malefactor who attempts to

impose upon the public a slender number of thermal units as a ton of

coal, but rather to give to ever man an opportunity to advertise the

number of such units which his particular article contains, thus

enabling the injured public to strike against an unfair mine.

Furthermore we are to become great exporters of coal, unless all signs

fail, and such certification should be required as to every ton sent

abroad.

Conservation Through Engineering Extract from the Annual Report of the Secretary of the Interior · 第 19 / 37 题