Wariness and an entire absence of all the sentiments that produce

recklessness in man, are as distinctly marked characters among the

_Felidæ_ as their peculiar dentition or retractile claws; yet the

author was informed by Colonel W. H. Harness that last summer (1893) a

very large panther, as the animal is called in West Virginia, walked

into an extensive logging camp near the town of Davis at midday;

traversed one wing of the long building in which the men employed

slept, and without making any demonstration of hostility towards those

who fled before him, entered their dining-room and helped himself to

the meat on the table; after which he quietly passed out of a side

door, and was shot from a window. If this beast had been broken down

with age or disabled by accident so that it could not hunt, or if the

season and weather had been such as to banish game from the vicinity,

its conduct might be comprehensible. This happened with an animal in

perfect physical condition, and at a season when the mountains were

full of game. The brute also must necessarily have connected all the

men it knew anything about with death-dealing firearms, and that it

then should have walked into a crowd, and lost its life in this act of

seemingly idiotic bravado, simply sets at naught everything that is

known of the creature’s character and habits.

Pumas, like Asiatic panthers, are easily caught in traps, but

independently of this form of incapacity, they are far from being

wanting in sagacity. Cougars are most accomplished hunters, and it has

been explained how much that means. One of them, for example, will

sometimes trail a human being for a day’s journey without finding what

it considers to be a suitable opportunity for making an attack.

The best and most intimate acquaintance with the character of a wild

beast comes from those associations involved in domestication. When

you have brought up an animal and been with it constantly day by day,

the chances of finding out what it is like are better than they could

be under any other conditions whatever. Prince Maximilian of Nieuwied,

states that the puma is “peculiarly susceptible of domestication.”

It does not appear, however, that he made any experiments in this

direction, and it may be suspected that if he had, certain reasons for

modifying his views upon the animal’s character would have suggested

themselves during their course. A cougar is a cat, and in virtue of

that fact is, as has been said, of all animals the least susceptible

of radical change. Sanderson and Barras make a wide distinction

between feline species, considered as amenable or refractory to such

influences; and nothing is offered in the way of disparagement to their

opinions, provided it be admitted that a young tiger may be a much

more amiable and interesting infant than a panther cub, and, according

to Gérard, a lion whelp attaches all hearts by its good qualities.

But there soon comes a time at which traits inherent in them all are

developed, and when they become strikingly alike in all their essential

characteristics.

The writer bears in affectionate remembrance a pet “panther” who, from

earliest life until his complete and splendid maturity, lived with

him upon terms of the closest companionship. Every one who seriously

studies anecdotes of brute intelligence and character must necessarily

distrust them. Their authors always, either directly or by implication,

put inference in the place of observation, or they start with a

hypothesis, the tendency of which is to assimilate evidence, and often,

no doubt unconsciously, fit facts to their own preconceptions. It is

hoped that the records of daily observation here made use of for the

purpose of sketching traits of character, may not prove to be without

some interest and value, and that their fragmentary and incomplete

form will witness to the fact that nothing is given which seemed to be

either speculative or unauthentic.

One sultry morning as the author sat at ease in his sala, an Indian

entered and said he had heard that the Señor delighted in wild beasts,

so that having by the help of God, some saints, and several friends,

slain the mother of this little lion in the Golden Mountains, he had

brought it there as a mark of respect, and would like to have seven

Spanish dollars. Here he unrolled his _serape_ and deposited a ball of

indistinctly striped and spotted fur upon the floor. In that manner

this puma of pumas came into the keeping of his guardian.

The latter impressed with a sense of the responsibilities attaching to

the position in which he was placed, at once sprinkled the cub with

red wine and called it Gato,--a procedure it resented as if the spirit

of Constantine Capronymus himself had entered into its sinful little

body. The rage of infancy, however, does not endure, and Gato shortly

“serened himself,” to use the idiom of the country, where these things

took place. He inspected his new acquaintance, rubbed up against him,

had his head scratched with much complacency, and graciously ate as

much as he could hold. Thus we made friends, and the compact was ever

after kept by both parties, each in his own way.

The panther’s way was a very simple one. It consisted in looking to

the being he had come in contact with for everything he wanted, and

resolutely refusing to enter into intimate communications with any one

else. Nobody who knew him could say that the least feeling of affection

ever warmed his heart, but it was plain enough that while he contemned

the human race, one man was tolerated, and a distinction made between

him and all others. Some individuals he detested at first sight, and

resented the slightest approach to familiarity. For the remainder he

entertained a quiet contempt; but as for fearing them, nothing was

further from his thoughts. So far as that went, it is very doubtful

whether he ever felt any real dread of his guardian. Some feeling akin

to respect may have existed in his mind. His powers of observation

were keen and quick, he saw that this particular person differed in

appearance from those about him, acted differently, and was somehow

or other not the same as they. If he got into difficulties, and was

likely to suffer the consequences of misconduct, hostilities against

him ceased when his friend appeared upon the scene; he understood this

perfectly, and took refuge with him when danger threatened. As was

said, Gato had no affectionate impulses so far as could be certainly

known. When he wanted to be stroked, or was hungry, or wished to play,

or felt insecure, he came to his guardian, followed him about, and lay

beside him. Moreover, the little savage was jealous. If he beheld a

dog it always put him in a passion to see it coming towards his master

to be caressed. He would fly to get ahead, dance about, jump on his

knee, and growl and show his teeth with every sign of anger against the

intruder upon his rights.

Colonel Julius Barras (“India and Tiger Hunting”) speaks of the

jealousy shown by tiger cubs in his possession, but whereas he was

satisfied that this was an expression of tenderness towards himself,

the writer thinks it more likely to have been an exhibition of

selfishness. Gato manifested at a very early age an appreciation of

his own possessions, and a determination to do things after his own

fashion. So far from checking this by force, his guardian encouraged

it, and after having come to a clear understanding with him on the

subject of biting and clawing, left him alone to follow his own

devices. He was a very sagacious personage, and there was not a drop of

cowardly blood in his whole body. When he was a baby there was little

to distinguish him, while at rest, from some domestic cats, but he no

sooner began to move about than his free wild air, the unmistakable

style of savagery that stamped every action, showed him in another way.

It may be added that, being left free to exhibit his individuality,

and not having his family and personal characteristics marred or

masked by enforced restraint until the creature grew dull, apathetic,

and half imbecile, he was as pretty a specimen of feline peculiarity

as any one could expect to see. Nothing was clearer to him than that

the many-colored rug he was accustomed to lie on was his own. He had

favorite places in which to sleep, meditate, and make observations.

It would have been disagreeable indeed for any servant about the

establishment to take off his bright silver collar after he grew to

any size, and when he captured anything and put it away, that article

became his private property, and he had no notion of giving it up.

Candor compels the admission that flattering as would have been some

tokens of disinterested affection, he never gave any. What he did

was to please himself. When he had no desire to be taught, which was

often the case, a more stupid, sulky, and unsatisfactory pupil could

not be imagined; but when his interest happened to be excited he was

quickness itself, and he seldom forgot. One might as well have caressed

a stuffed cat, or tried to romp with a dead one, as to have expected

any recognition of advances in these directions when Señor Gato felt

disposed to contemplation, and if compelled, as of course was the case

sometimes, to do anything against his humor, he was not accustomed to

leave any doubt about the disgust and anger which possessed him. From

first to last, always, and under all circumstances, he like Richard,

was “himself alone,” and never stooped to the snobbishness of pretence.

Thus it happened that although under fostering care and paternal rule

the creature grew in grace continually, he never became fitted to adorn

general society. The asperity of his nature easily showed itself; the

wild beast broke through the habitual dignity of his demeanor on small

provocation. Not even that to him, extraordinary person with whom he

was most intimate, and whose resources so powerfully impressed his

mind, might pull his ears or twist his tail after he grew up. This was

to pass the proper limits of familiarity, and whenever it happened he

crouched and glared with glistening fangs. That was all, however; no

act of hostility followed.

Gato began to stalk his guardian at an early age, but soon learned

that a statue of St. John the Evangelist was not alive, and gave

up his practices against the Apostle. He discovered likewise the

illusory character of shadows, which at one time were taken to be

substantialities, and somehow or other satisfied his mind about his own

reflection in a fountain when the wind ruffled its surface. This gave

him much concern for a while. Being accustomed to look at himself in a

glass, and to stand with his fore-paws on the edge of the basin and see

his reflection in still water, what perplexed and excited him was the

fact that it sometimes looked as if it moved while he was motionless.

Whether he found out about the ripple, nobody knows, but he stopped

tearing round the fountain and peering into it to see this thing from

different positions.

It was not until he was quite a good-sized animal that the pretence

of killing his guardian was given up. As the gravity of age grew

upon him, and those engaging pastimes of his childhood gave way

before the development of inherent traits, these playful hunts became

more rare and finally ceased. Both of us fully understood that this

stalking business was nothing but fun. In fact, Gato never fully

entered into the spirit of his part or displayed his powers to their

greatest advantage, unless he was closely watched. Then, however,

his acting was perfect. He got as far off as possible in the long,

gallery-like room, fastened his glowing eyes upon the pretended

victim, and from first to last showed how complete are the teachings

of heredity, both in all that he did and avoided doing. Nothing that

could favor his approach was neglected, no mistake was made. The

furniture might be differently arranged with design, lights and shadows

changed, new places of concealment, from which he could make his

mimic attack, constructed; but the animal’s tactics never failed to

alter in accordance with these arrangements, and to be the best that

circumstances admitted of. There is no doubt that he admired himself

greatly, and, so far as it was possible to judge, commendation was very

pleasing. He always expected to be complimented and caressed after

darting from an ambush which had been reached with much precaution, and

he reared up and rubbed his head against his friend, asking for praise

as plainly as possible.

This account is not intended to convey any principles of zoöpsychology,

but to record special facts relating to an animal whose family the

author looks upon as exceptional in respect to their savagery, and

who was himself, so far as the closest observation will warrant one

in making a sweeping statement about a wild beast, not recognizably

different in his characteristics from other members of the race he

belonged to, or average individuals of allied species. “_Magnum

hereditatis mysterium_” is a truth relating to the _process_ of

heredity alone; it has nothing to do with the fact that like produces

like, or that traits, from the most generalized to those which are

special, are undoubtedly transmitted. Here was a creature developed

through immemorial generations into a typical state of body and

mind. So far as the result is concerned, it does not make the least

difference whether this end was attained in the manner pointed out by

Darwin, or Galton, or Weismann. In Gato the whole personality, every

faculty and feeling, the functional and structural peculiarities of all

his tissues and tissue elements, were stamped with that impress which

the entire life of his savage ancestry entailed. On what grounds can it

be supposed that such perfectly superficial influences, as were brought

to bear upon him while under restraint, produce any radical change?

The alteration in demeanor manifested towards one person, and probably

effected through that self-interest which, in its general aspect, is

exhibited by all the higher animals, did not show that he had been, so

to speak, inoculated with civilized sentiments. On the contrary, he

gave a flat denial to that opinion every day, and was as essentially

a puma, pure and simple, at the hour of his death, as if he had never

seen a man.

It would, however, be a singular course of reasoning by which the

inference that all pumas were the same was drawn from this statement.

Besides the congenital variation that, to conceal our ignorance, we

say is involved in the plasticity of life, every organism has certain

acquired differences. Life is no more than a state dependent upon

continuous adjustments, and it can never exist in an identical degree

in separate beings, because neither the conditions themselves, nor

the power to fit body or mind to circumstances, is ever the same in

different individuals. Evolved structures, functions, and qualities

in groups, will be similar; for animals of all kinds must resemble

their direct progenitors; but individuality is not extinguished, and

as the race rises in capacity, or its members vary from an average,

personal traits become salient, and those dissimilarities produced by

alterations in the process by which existence is maintained, appear

more prominently.

Almost the entire body of emotions which Gato possessed as a beast

of prey, as well as his moral and intellectual traits, were beyond

the reach of any modifications that could be made artificially. He

was morose, cruel, treacherous, and blood-thirsty; but, it does not

follow that he was absolutely so, or that, when compared with other

pumas, these characteristics of his species were equally pronounced.

Observation enables the writer to say that this animal was more

intelligent, tractable, responsive, and reliable than any other beast

of the same kind with which he ever was brought into close association.

A direct parallel between men, even barbarous men, and brutes will

always fail. We do not know enough of the mental organization of either

even to apply terms justly; and more than this, the difference between

them in developmental states is so great that while the phenomena of

both are of the same order, and the language used in describing one

is applicable to the other, there are not close enough likenesses

between them to make comparisons possible. Those who have attempted

to frame psychological schemes, vitiated their work for the most

part by a false method, or invalidated the conclusions arrived at,

in consequence of preconceptions which biassed the temper in which

evidence was examined. Dr. W. L. Lindsay (“Mind in the Lower Animals

in Health and Disease”) recognized the relationship between psychical

manifestations wherever they took place, yet the influence, as in his

case, of this, among many other hypotheses, was almost certain to

make itself felt in the manner in which facts were regarded. On the

other hand, Professor Prantl (“Reformgedanken zur Logik”) excogitated

a metaphysical system for beasts from the standpoint of an assumption

that the chasm which separated them from humanity was impassable.

He admits their resemblance in essential nature. He agrees that the

dissimilarities which they exhibit are results of a difference in

evolutionary degree, and then his whole argument goes to show that

this is not the case, and that brute mind and human intellect are

radically distinct in structure and function. As this analysis of the

intelligence in mankind and inferior beings was made without reference

to facts, it is not surprising that they should be traversed by these

in all directions, and that almost everything which the Professor

asserts to be impossible, is well known to naturalists as a matter of

actual occurrence.

Gato himself set at naught many of his conclusions. He may not have

exhibited either love, gratitude, sense of duty, or that spirit of

self-sacrifice which dogs frequently, and other animals sometimes,

display, and there was no opportunity for judging of his social

instincts; but he certainly possessed the “time sense” that Prantl

attributes exclusively to man. His account of periods and seasons was

as accurate as possible; he measured intervals and knew when they came

to an end. Whether the ability to count beyond three existed, it

was impossible to determine. The three copper balls he used to play

with were exactly alike, and if one was missing, its absence never

failed to be noticed at once. If it occurred to him that it had been

taken away intentionally, he got angry or sulky, as the case might

be. During one part of his wardship, the periodical absences of his

only friend put him out greatly, because, so far as actions revealed

the creature’s feelings, they interfered with his comfort. He became

dangerous when grown, and occupied a room by himself, from which he was

not removed while his guardian was gone. Under ordinary circumstances

he was released for several hours every night, and when the time came,

if there was any delay, he began to call upon his comrade to let him

out, and grew fierce if not attended to. No one ever knew him to take

any violent exercise in this apartment, but the gymnastic performances

he went through outside were worth seeing. After being confined in

solitude a couple of days, which was the length of time his friend

generally remained absent, his eagerness to see him back became

excessive, according to all reports. He was restless, savage, and

sometimes refused to eat on the last evening. The servants said that

long before they themselves heard the horse’s tread, it might be known

from Gato that his liberator was coming. But he never welcomed him as a

dog or horse will do. He was full of exuberant vitality, endowed with

an intelligent interest in the strange things around him, which he

studied with continued interest, and inspired with an inherited passion

for liberty. This always showed itself first. No sooner was the door

opened than he darted out, intoxicated with being free, and it was not

until nervous tension had been relieved by violent muscular motion,

that he bethought himself of other matters.

To sit and watch a man take himself to pieces was pleasing but

puzzling. It was evident that boots were part of the body, because

his nose told him so. How could they be taken off, and why had these

feet their claws behind? A sword and pistol did not perplex his mind,

apparently, as much as the foot gear and spurs. The rapier he admired,

like all bright objects, but the firearm excited distrust as being,

perhaps, capable of going off spontaneously. He knew about revolvers,

but placed no confidence in them whatever. Having presided over

the strange process of taking off one skin and putting on another,

inspected the articles of clothing removed, and assured himself that

those assumed had really become part of the incomprehensible being who

did these things, he was ready for his own toilet, which was confined

to a gentle brushing of the head. This was expected, however, and was

suggested if it did not come soon enough. Then he was ready to go to

dinner, a pleasing interlude during which his manners were marked with

the greatest elegance and discretion. It was not appetite that moved

Gato--he had gratified that before; it was the performance itself.

Forks, for instance, those queer talons that were picked up and laid

down, excited his curiosity. He examined them, he ate from one with

propriety, their glitter attracted him, but he did not understand

the rationale of such devices, and their use never failed to fix

his attention. Moreover, on occasions when the amenities of social

intercourse were in order, he was peaceable enough; not affable by any

means, for he never noticed the attendants or appeared to be conscious

of their presence. Smoking afforded this observant creature much

satisfaction. Smoke itself, if puffed in his face, displeased him, but

the preliminaries, striking a match, and the wreaths that floated away

and vanished, all this he liked and pondered upon, as he did on certain

pictures hung around, and everything that for reasons which can only be

guessed at, excited wonder. Professor Prantl lays down the law that a

beast cannot think logically; nevertheless, and apart from other facts

which refute that decision, it was perfectly plain that Gato solved

some problems implying this power. After a course of observations and

experiments, it was discovered by him that shadows were not alive

because they moved, and then these ceased to be pursued. Much study

was requisite to arrive at a conclusion that the sunbeams reflected

from a mirror were of the same inanimate nature. This was settled to

his satisfaction only after great research. The creature saw this

thing done time and again before convincing himself of the resemblance

between those luminous shadows and the dark spectra which had formerly

deceived him.

Gato grew graver with age, and abandoned many amusements in which he

had at one time taken delight. It seemed to his guardian that there

was a steady development of his intellect, which showed itself in

everything he did. It would be too much to say that he was capable

of thinking about his own thoughts, but who shall decide that he was

not? With consciousness, memory, and a strong sense of personal

identity; filled with innate tendencies, through the medium of which he

interpreted external impressions; prone to contemplations that, as his

eye and changing attitudes indicated, were not vague, apathetic dreams,

no one can know that he did not revive mental states and meditate on

centrically initiated ideas.

Wild beasts · 第 18 / 25 段