L.

_Foundation Stone of St. Mark's, Venice._--In vol. xxvi. of the

_Archaeologia_ is a paper by the late Mr. Douce, "On the foundation stone of

the original church of St. Mark, at Venice," &c., accompanied by an

engraving of the mutilated object itself, which also appears to have been

submitted to the inspection of the Society of Antiquaries at the time the

paper was read. The essay contains, in reality, very little information

relating to the stone, and that little is of no very satisfactory kind; and

I have never been able to divest myself of the idea that it bears somewhat

the semblance of a hoax. Were I inclined to discuss the points which have

suggested this notion, the necessity there is for brevity in corresponding

with the Editor of "NOTES AND QUERIES" would preclude my doing it; but I

must quote the following passage, which comes immediately after the

statement that the original church, in the foundation of which this stone

was deposited, was destroyed in 976.

"It is very possible that, in clearing away the rubbish of the old

church, the original foundation stone was discovered, and, in some way

or other, at present not traceable, preserved."

{89} If the fact is so, this stone, "of a circular form, the diameter six

inches and a quarter, its thickness half an inch," must have been loose in

the world for 858 years from its exhumation to 1834, when Mr. Douce's essay

was read, and during that time has lost only the least important part of

its inscription and ornaments.

Can any one say where this stone now is? When and where Mr. Douce obtained

it? And, I must add, what history was attached to it when in his

possession? for he was not a person likely to possess such an object

without, at least, endeavouring to trace its history. On these points the

essay contains not a word.

Notes and Queries, Number 66, February 1, 1851 A Medium of Inter-communication for Literary Men, Artists, Antiquaries, Genealogists, etc. · 第 51 / 101 题