Then, in 1769, before Whitefield sailed for America, there were

published: 1. “Methodism, a Popish Idol; or the Danger and Harmony

of Enthusiasm and Separation. By Booth Braithwaite.” (8vo.) “A raving

pamphlet,” said the _Monthly Review_, “against sectaries, with abundant

zeal, little knowledge, and less charity.” 2. “A Letter to a Young

Gentleman at Oxford, intended for Holy Orders” (8vo.),――in ardent

language warning the “young gentleman” against Confessionalists,

Monthly Reviewers, Blasphemers, Reprobates, and Methodists. 3. “The

Pretences of Enthusiasts Considered and Confuted; a Sermon preached

before the University of Oxford, at St. Mary’s, June 26, 1768. By

William Hawkins, M.A., Prebendary of Wells. Published by desire.”

(8vo., 27 pp.) Mr. Hawkins confesses that he has “little hope of

converting spiritual dishonesty, or convincing religious infatuation;”

but he insists that “all pretences of illiterate laymen, and ignorant

mechanics, _to expound the way of God more perfectly_, in consequence

of supernatural inspiration and spiritual illumination, are plainly

to be resolved into the artifice of imposture, or the insanity of

enthusiasm.”

On the other hand, there was published a curious and well-executed

engraving, of folio size, entitled, “The Tree of Life: likewise a View

of the New Jerusalem, and this present Evil World; with the Industry

of Gospel Ministers in endeavouring to pluck sinners from the wrath

to come.” The copy before me is the only one I have ever seen, or

heard of; and, therefore, a brief description of it may be welcome.

The “Tree of Life” is large and fantastic. Its roots are entitled,

“Glorious,” “Gracious,” “Holy,” “Just,” “Wise,” “Almighty,” and

“Omnipresent.” On its stem and two lowest branches is a representation

of the crucified Saviour. Its twelve fruits are “Everlasting Love,”

“Election,” “Pardon,” “Righteousness,” “Refuge,” “Security,” “Peace,”

“Sanctification,” “Promises,” “Good-will,” “Perseverance,” and “Eternal

Redemption.” Its foliage is inscribed with the words, “Circumcision,”

“Baptism,” “Fasting,” “Temptation,” “Victory,” “Poverty,” “Obedience,”

“Shame,” “Reproach,” “Imprisonment,” “Stripes,” “Buffeting,” “Death,”

and “Resurrection.” “The New Jerusalem” is resplendent with the divine

glory, and is surrounded with lovely scenery. “The present Evil World,”

at the bottom of the picture, contains a large number of male and

female figures, some of them in “the Broad Way,” others indulging in

“the Pride of Life,” and others in “Chambering and Wantonness.” In

the right hand corner is the “Bottomless Pit,” with sundry demons,

and ablaze with fire; while, at its mouth, sits “Babylon, Mother

of Harlots,” with a large goblet in her hand; and out of the pit an

avaricious-looking wretch is endeavouring to escape, for the purpose

of clutching his money bags, which are inscribed with the word

“Extortion,” but a grinning fiend has seized him by the long flowing

hair of his head, and prevents him going farther. In the midst of one

crowd, Wesley is preaching, and represented as crying, “Believe on

the Lord Jesus Christ.” In another crowd, _close_ to the “Bottomless

Pit,” stands Whitefield, the likeness excellent, and bearing a strong

resemblance to the portrait in the present volume. The multitude

around him evince great excitement. One man, on his right hand, cries,

“What shall I do to be saved?” Another, on his left, whose coat-tail

a demon grasps, exclaims, “Save, Lord, or I perish.” And Whitefield,

in the midst, dressed in full canonicals, and with hands uplifted,

shouts, “Behold the Lamb.” The whole thing is ludicrous; but it was

friendly, and, no doubt, was published in favour of Whitefield and

his fellow-labourer. Whether it was calculated to answer the artist’s

purpose is another question. Sometimes man has need to pray, “Save me

from my friends!”

To return to Whitefield’s history. Little is known of his proceedings

during the first four months of 1768. The interval seems to have been

spent in London, and, doubtless, was well employed in preaching and

other religious duties. On Wednesday, March 23, he had to perform

a painful duty, to which he had been long accustomed. James Gibson,

attorney-at-law, had been found guilty of the crime of forgery, and

had been sentenced to suffer death. On the morning of the culprit’s

execution, Whitefield attended him in Newgate prison, prayed with him,

and administered to him the holy sacrament. Gibson, a good-looking man

of about forty-five years of age, professed to rely on the merits of

his Saviour; and, in a mourning coach, dressed in black, and wearing a

ruffled shirt, was driven to Tyburn, where his behaviour was devout and

manly, and his sentence was executed.[607]

At Whitsuntide, Whitefield visited Tunbridge Wells, Lewes, and Brighton.

At the first of these places, Lady Huntingdon had procured a permanent

residence, on Mount Ephraim; and Whitefield preached twice in the open

air. “Very many,” says her ladyship, “were cut to the heart. Sinners

trembled exceedingly before the Lord, and a universal impression seemed

to abide upon the multitude. Truly God was in the midst of us to wound

and to heal.”[608]

The following letter, addressed to Whitefield by Rowland Hill, refers

to this visit to Tunbridge Wells, but is chiefly valuable as containing

a sketch of the proceedings of the Methodist students at Cambridge, and

as exhibiting some of the peculiarities of young Rowland’s character:――

“CAMBRIDGE, _May 12, 1768_.

“REV. AND VERY DEAR SIR,――I am glad to hear we are to expect a

smaller edition of your valuable ‘Letter.’[609] I doubt not but

it will be of further utility. It has been read much in this

place. That and the _Shaver_[610] have been sent for to all the

coffee-houses in this University; so that, no doubt, all our

heads have seen all that has been written. But if you think it

any advantage to send each of our heads a separate copy, I will

contrive my best to get it done.

“God be praised for what is doing by the endeavours of dear Lady

Huntingdon at Tunbridge Wells! How wonderfully is she carried

from one place of dissipation to another! How glorious is her

continued progress!

“Blessed be God! we are not without being steeped more than ever

in shame in this place; or, as the old proverb goes, we have

eaten shame and drank after it, and I trust it digests well.

Though we always endeavour to keep clear of a mob, in letting

no more know than our different houses will hold, yet, in spite

of all that can be done, more or less of the gown constantly

attend. The Lord, through much grace, generally keeping me clear

of the fear of man, gives me some little strength to tell you all

about it; and, as I find burs generally stick faster to people’s

clothes than roses, I am sometimes apt to deal in that rough

ware. They have hitherto always stood, like poor brow-beaten

things, with much attention till we have done, when they

generally get together to compare notes, which they afterwards

retail among others of the University, drest up in a droll

fashion, well embellished, with the addition of many ludicrous

lies.

“This makes all, as I pass the streets, stop to wonder at me,

as a strange oddity; but, as I am more than ever convinced

that the only way God ever will carry on His work, is by the

manifestation of His own almighty power, without any of our

assisting influence or trimming, I find the only way to meet

with a blessing is to be honest and open in telling them the

simple truth, and leaving God to bless it. This, I trust, has,

in some measure, been the case at Cambridge. Four of the many

gownsmen, that have been at times my hearers of late, have never

missed an opportunity of attending, and have been at much pains

to enquire the time and place of our meeting. After hearing,

they wish me a good eve; and, when absent, speak respectfully

of the word. Many others, too, having been convinced in their

judgments, approve of its being right; while others, filled with

the hottest madness, dress me up as a fool, and cudgel me as a

knave.

“The other night, the mob of the gown, which raised a second

of the town, ran so high at the house where we had a meeting,

that the constable, who is a friend, was forced to attend,

that no riot might ensue; but, as I thought to be attended with

constables was yet too high an honour for such a poor beginner,

I hope it was nothing more than what Christian prudence would

advise, to be more private the next time, and be contented

with a house full, attended only with a few gownsmen by way

of bringing up the rear.

“As for our Doctors, ’tis remarkable how very patiently they

bear with my conduct, as they now know that as I have but

a little while to stay, an expulsion from Cambridge would

hardly answer. They seem now to have come to the following

compromise――that I am to continue to be possessor of my

_professorship_, and to be still bishop over all their parishes,

provided I will be contented with houses or barns, and leave

them alone with quiet possession of their streets, fields,

and churches, and, by and by, they will be glad to sign my

_testimonium_, in order to get rid of me. Thus, in the end,

I hope, through grace, I shall be enabled to make good what

I promised to one, who asked me, when we enthusiasts intended

to stop. My answer was, ‘Not at all, till such time as we have

carried all before us.’

“I am in the greatest hope that the Lord will soon give dear

―――― a heart to help me. He is a steady, warm, lively Christian,

and grows prodigiously, and bids by far the fairest for the

predicted phœnix of any that are in this place.

“Do continue to be earnest in prayer to God for us. I want much

humbling. Spiritual pride, at present, is my grand temptation.

“Having not any spare time, I am forced to write thus in haste,

and conclude with subscribing myself your poorest son and

servant for Christ’s sake,

“ROWLAND HILL.”[611]

The foregoing letter is valuable for its facts, if for nothing else.

Rowland Hill was evincing courage hardly inferior to that of the first

Oxford Methodists. Without courting persecution, he was not afraid of

it. To be laughed at was not pleasant, but it was not heeded. Rowland

was no longer threatened with expulsion; but he was made the object of

collegiate ridicule. Eight months after this, he proceeded to his B.A.

degree, and his name appeared in the list of honours.

There can be no doubt that one of the best ways to propagate any

new creed or system is to implant it in the national Universities.

Whether designedly or otherwise, Methodism had thus been rooted at

both Oxford and Cambridge. The Heads of Houses at Oxford did their

utmost to destroy it. Those at Cambridge were not so ruthless. Why?

Was it because the expelled at Oxford were of low degree? and because

the Cambridge leader, Rowland Hill, was the son of an English baronet?

Perhaps it was.

Whitefield was generally jubilant. His path was often rough and

difficult, but he pursued it singing. The following was addressed to

Captain Joss:――

“LONDON, _May 17, 1768_.

“MY DEAR MAN,――Go forward! go forward! is the watchword of

the present day. Never mind the envious cry of elder brethren.

Had they been hearkened to, the Prodigal must never have come

home, nor Goliath’s head have been cut off. All temple-builders,

especially when called to work in the field, must endure, not

only the contradiction of sinners, but, the contradiction of

saints. Happy are they who are so deeply engaged in building as

not to have time to hearken to either. I long to come and lend

a helping, though feeble hand. But Welsh horses move slowly. If

the Welsh apostle comes, I purpose, in the Whitsun week, to make

a short excursion into Sussex and Kent, and then for Bristol.

“Blessed be God! the shout of a King is heard in our camps. Let

us march forward, with palms of victory in our hands, crying,

‘Hallelujah! The Lord God omnipotent reigneth!’”

A month after the date of this letter Whitefield was in Edinburgh; but

how he went, and why he went, no one seems to know. His popularity,

however, in the northern metropolis, was as great as ever. Hence he

writes:――

“EDINBURGH, _June 15, 1768_.

(TO MR. KEEN) “You would be delighted to see our Orphan

House Park assemblies; as large and attentive as ever.

Twenty-seven-year-old friends and spiritual children remember

the days of old. They are seeking after their first love, and

there seems to be a stirring among the dry bones. I cannot tell

you when I shall move. Probably within a fortnight.”

“EDINBURGH, _July 2, 1768_.

(TO MR. ANDREW KINSMAN) “My dear Timothy, I am much obliged to

you for your staying in London, till I return from Scotland. My

journey hither was certainly of God. Could I preach ten times a

day, thousands and thousands would attend. I have been confined

for a few days, but, on Monday or Tuesday next, hope to mount my

throne again. O to die there! Too great, too great an honour to

be expected! I thank my wife for her kind letter just received.

I am here only in danger of being hugged to death. Friends of

all ranks seem heartier and more friendly than ever. All is

of Grace! Grace! I go on in my old way, without turning to the

right hand or to the left. Providence says every day, ‘This is

the way; walk in it.’ Tender love to all, particularly to my

dear wife. Next post she may expect to hear from me.”

“EDINBURGH, _July 9, 1768_.

(TO MR. KEEN) “God be praised that all is so well in London.

Everything goes on better and better here; but I am so worn down

by preaching abroad, and by talking at home almost all the day

long, that I have determined to set off for London next Tuesday.

As you do not mention my wife, I suppose she is out of town.”

Exactly a month after this, Whitefield’s wife was dead. On his return

to London, she was attacked with fever, and died on August 9. Five

days afterwards, he preached her funeral sermon;[612] and, noticing

her fortitude, remarked,――“Do you remember my preaching in those

fields by the old stump of a tree? The multitude was great, and many

were disposed to be riotous. At first, I addressed them firmly; but

when a desperate gang drew near, with the most ferocious and horrid

imprecations and menaces, my courage began to fail. My wife was

then standing behind me, as I stood on the table. I think I hear her

now. She pulled my gown, and, looking up, said, ‘George, play the

man for your God.’ My confidence returned. I spoke to the multitude

with boldness and affection. They became still, and many were

deeply affected.”[613] A monument to the memory of Whitefield’s

wife was put up in Tottenham Court Road chapel, with the following

inscription:[614]――

“To the memory of Mrs. Whitefield, who, after thirty years’

strong and frequent manifestations of her Redeemer’s love, mixed

with strong and frequent strugglings against the buffetings of

Satan, and many sicknesses and indwellings of sin, was joyfully

released, August 9, 1769.”[615]

Whitefield submitted to his bereavement with Christian resignation. Two

days after he preached his wife’s funeral sermon, he wrote, in a letter

to Captain Joss:――“Let us work whilst it is day. The late unexpected

breach is a fresh proof that the night soon cometh, when no man can

work. Pray, where may I find that grand promise made to Abraham after

Sarah’s death? May it be fulfilled in you, whilst your Sarah is yet

alive! Sweet bereavements, when God Himself fills up the chasm! Through

mercy I find it so. Adieu.”

On Wednesday, August 24, Whitefield opened the College of the Countess

of Huntingdon at Trevecca, by preaching from the words: “In all places

where I record My name, I will come unto thee, and bless thee.” The

next day, he gave an exhortation to the students, from: “He shall be

great in the sight of the Lord.” And, on Sunday, August 28, preached

in the court before the College, to a congregation of thousands, from:

“Other foundation can no man lay, than that which is laid, which is

Jesus Christ.”[616]

He then hurried back to London, where he arrived on September 1. His

health was broken, and he was again an invalid. In a letter, dated

September 6, he wrote to a sick and suffering friend:――

“Why should not one invalid write to another? What if we should

meet in our way to heaven unembodied,――freed from everything

that at present weighs down our precious and immortal souls? For

these two days past I have been almost unable to write: to-day,

I am, what they call better.”

Immediately after this, he ruptured a blood-vessel; and, on

September 12, remarked:――

“I have been in hopes of my departure. Through hard riding,

and frequent preaching, I have burst a vein. The flux is, in

a great measure, stopped; but rest and quietness are strictly

enjoined.”[617]

Rashly enough, Whitefield re-commenced preaching before the month was

ended. One of his friends, Mr. Middleton, died a triumphant death,

and Whitefield must preach a funeral sermon. His text was, “I have

chosen thee in the furnace of affliction.” The word “chosen” gave

him an opportunity to dwell upon the doctrine of election. “I know

no other doctrine,” said he, “that can truly humble man; for either

God must choose us, or we must choose God.” As usual, his sermon was

interspersed with anecdotes, one of which may be given here. “A noble

lady,” said Whitefield, “told me herself, that when she was crying on

account of one of her children’s death, her little daughter came to her

and said, ‘Mamma, is God Almighty dead, you cry so?’ The lady replied,

‘No.’ ‘Mamma, will you lend me your glove?’ said the child. The

mother let her take it; and, in due time, asked for it again. ‘Mamma!’

remarked the child, ‘shall I cry because you have taken back your

glove? And shall you cry because God has taken back my sister?’”[618]

A reference is made to the death and burial of Mr. Middleton in the

following extract from a letter:――

“London, September 26, 1768. For some days, the flux of blood

has stopped entirely. Praise the Lord, O my soul! Mr. Middleton

is now made perfectly whole. He was buried from the Tabernacle

last Wednesday evening, and a subscription is opened for his

four orphans.”

“Where is Mr. Middleton now?” cried Whitefield in the sermon just

mentioned. “Where is my dear fellow-labourer, that honest, that steady

man of God? If in the midst of torture, he could answer his daughter

and say, ‘Heaven upon earth! heaven upon earth!’ surely now that he

sees God, and sees Christ, he must cry, ‘Heaven in heaven!’”

A few weeks after this, Whitefield set out for Bath and Bristol; and

began to have a longing to go to his orphans at Bethesda. He writes:――

“Bristol, November 12, 1768. Bethesda lies upon my heart night

and day. Something must be determined speedily. As, I trust, my

eye is single, God will assuredly direct my goings. Hitherto, He

has helped. He will do so to the end. Hallelujah! Hallelujah!”

By the end of November, he was back to London, and wrote:――

“November 30, 1768. Many thought I should not hold out from Bath

to London; but I cannot as yet go to Him whom my soul loveth.

Last Sunday, I creeped up to my gospel-throne; this evening,

the same honour is to be conferred upon me. Mr. Wright is going

with his brothers to Georgia to finish the wings of the intended

College, and repair the present buildings.”

Whitefield’s weakness continued; but he preached as often as he

was able. “I love the open bracing air;” said he, on December 14;

“preaching within doors, and especially to crowded auditories, is apt

to make us nervous.”

In another letter, dated “December 15,” he remarked:――

“You cannot tell how low my late excursion to Bath and Bristol

brought me. I would leave future events to God, and, like you

merchants, would improve the present _now_. Time is short;

eternity is endless. I have considered the affair of the picture.

What think you? A limner, who lately drew me, and hung the

picture in the Exhibition, asks forty guineas for a copy.[619] I

shall not mind him, but send a bust taken several years ago. It

shall be presented as a token of my hearty, hearty love to the

Orphan House at Edinburgh, and its never-to-be-forgotten friends.”

The first three months of the year 1769 were spent in London.

Whitefield was extremely feeble. Wesley wrote:――

“1769. Monday, January 9. I spent a comfortable and profitable

hour with Mr. Whitefield, in calling to mind the former times,

and the manner wherein God prepared us for a work which it had

not then entered into our hearts to conceive.”

And again:――

“Monday, February 27. I had one more agreeable conversation with

my old friend and fellow-labourer, George Whitefield. His soul

appeared to be vigorous still, but his body was sinking apace;

and, unless God interposes with His mighty hand, he must soon

finish his labours.”[620]

Comparatively speaking, these three months were a time of inaction;

and yet, to Whitefield and others, they were a time of great enjoyment.

Lady Huntingdon was now in London, and, at her residence in Portland

Row, Cavendish Square, there were delightful re-unions of Methodist

clergymen. Whitefield, the two Wesleys, Romaine, Venn, and others, were

often assembled there, for preaching, sacramental administration, and

Christian fellowship. On the 10th of January, Whitefield administered

the sacrament, and Wesley preached on, “By grace are ye saved, through

faith.” A week afterwards, Romaine administered the Lord’s Supper,

and Whitefield preached. On February 28, Whitefield was present, but

wholly unable to take any active part in the services of the day. The

Rev. Messrs. Green and Elliott administered the sacrament and Romaine

preached. Sometimes Venn administered, and at others preached. When

he was able, Whitefield would preach in her ladyship’s drawing-room

on several days successively. At the last meeting, previous to the

Countess leaving London, Charles Wesley exhorted all present to “stand

fast in one mind and in one judgment;” Romaine administered the Lord’s

Supper; Venn and Whitefield prayed; and all sang the glorious doxology,

“Praise God, from whom all blessings flow.”[621]

By the month of March, Whitefield’s health was considerably improved.

In letters, addressed to his old friend, Thomas Adams, he wrote:――

“London, March 11, 1769. My very dear Tommy. Through infinite

mercy, I am enabled to preach thrice a week, besides engaging

in other occasional exercises. The shout of the King of kings

is amongst us. After Easter, I hope to make an elopement to

Gloucestershire, and some western parts. I feel the loss of my

right hand[622] daily; but right hands and right eyes must be

parted with for Him, who ordereth all things well.”

“London, March 31, 1769. Through infinite mercy, I have been

enabled to preach four days successively. We have been favoured

with a blessed Passover season: all to make us shout louder,

‘Grace! Grace!’”

Whitefield still longed to get away to his beloved Bethesda. On

March 17, he wrote to Mr. Dixon, his manager there:――“I am every day,

every hour, almost every moment, thinking of, and preparing for America.

A pilgrim life to me is the sweetest on this side eternity.” No wonder

that Whitefield wished to be at his Orphan House. He had sent workmen

to erect the new buildings already mentioned, and, only eight days

after the date of this letter to Mr. Dixon, the foundation stones

were laid with as much ceremonial pomp as the colony of Georgia could

contribute. Hence the following letter, dated “Savannah, in Georgia,

March 29, 1769,” and published in _Lloyd’s Evening Post_, of June 2:――

The Life of the Rev. George Whitefield, Volume 2 (of 2) · 第 54 / 68 段