The _Boston Journal_ said:--

“We trust that the length of Mr. Sumner’s speech will deter

none from its perusal. It is what it professes to be, an

examination of the institution of Slavery itself,--and we

venture to say a more acute, comprehensive, exhaustive, and

powerful exposition of the whole subject never was made.

Whoever wants to understand what American Slavery is must

read this speech; whoever wants to make headway against the

ripening public feeling by defending Slavery must first try to

answer the arguments of this speech. If he does not, he will

be in danger of imitating the folly of Senator Chesnut, and,

through an exhibition of passion and scurrility, of becoming a

living illustration of its truths.… The nation has certainly

been drifting into a too general acquiescence in the doctrine,

upheld openly or insidiously by both factions of the Democratic

party, that slaves are property, precisely like any other

property known to the Common Law. Any utterance like this of

Mr. Sumner’s, which shall call the American people from this

disgraceful and dangerous conclusion, may well be generously

criticised in other respects.”

The _New Bedford Mercury_ had the following, in a letter from Boston.

“The chief event of interest, certainly to Bostonians, lately,

is the astonishing speech delivered by Charles Sumner, in his

place in the Senate, in which he takes up the Slavery Question

precisely where he left it off, when stricken down by the cane

of the deceased bully Brooks. Offensive as that speech proved

to the Slave-Masters, this one is ten times worse. This speech,

for the first time in the history of Congressional speeches,

sets forth, without the slightest veil or mincing of the

matter, the deformities, obliquities, and immoralities of the

Slavery system.”

Charles Sumner: his complete works, volume 06 (of 20) · 第 147 / 208 题