V.iii.264 (485,7)

_Edg._ Or image of that horror?

_Alb._ Fall, and cease!]

These two exclamations are given to Edgar and Albany in the folio, to

animate the dialogue, and employ all the persons on the stage; but they

are very obscure.

V.iii.301 (487,4) With boot] With advantage, with increase.

(488) General Observation. The tragedy of Lear is deservedly celebrated

among the dramas of Shakespeare. There is perhaps no play which keeps

the attention so strongly fixed; which so much agitates our passions and

interests our curiosity. The artful involutions of distinct interests,

the striking opposition of contrary characters, the sudden changes of

fortune, and the quick succession of events, fill the mind with a

perpetual tumult of indignation, pity, and hope. There is no scene which

does not contribute to the aggravation of the distress or conduct of the

action, and scarce a line which does not conduce to the progress of the

scene. So powerful is the current of the poet's imagination, that the

mind, which once ventures within it, is hurried irresistibly along.

On the seeming improbability of Lear's conduct it may be observed, that

he is represented according to histories at that time vulgarly received

as true. And, perhaps, if we turn our thoughts upon the barbarity and

ignorance of the age to which this story is referred, it will appear not

so unlikely as while we estimate Lear's manners by our own. Such

preference of one daughter to another, or resignation of dominion on

such conditions, would be yet credible, if told of a petty prince of

Guinea or Madagascar. Shakespeare, indeed, by the mention of his earls

and dukes, has given us the idea of times more civilized, and of life

regulated by softer manners; and the truth is, that though he so nicely

discriminates, and so minutely describes the characters of men, he

commonly neglects and confounds the characters of ages, by mingling

customs ancient and modern, English and foreign.

My learned friend Mr. Warton, who has in the _Adventurer_ very minutely

criticised this play, remarks, that the instances of cruelty are too

savage and shocking, and that the intervention of Edmund destroys the

simplicity of the story. These objections may, I think, be answered, by

repeating, that the cruelty of the daughters is an historical fact, to

which the poet has added little, having only drawn it into a series by

dialogue and action. But I am not able to apologize with equal

plausibility for the extrusion of Glo'ster's eyes, which seems an act

too horrid to be endured in dramatic exhibition, and such as must always

compel the mind to relieve its distress by incredulity. Yet let it be

remembered that our author well knew what would please the audience for

which he wrote.

The injury done by Edmund to the simplicity of the action is abundantly

recompensed by the addition of variety, by the art with which he is made

to co-operate with the chief design, and the opportunity which he gives

the poet of combining perfidy with perfidy, and connecting the wicked

son with the wicked daughters, to impress this important moral, that

villainy is never at a stop, that crimes lead to crimes, and at last

terminate in ruin.

But though this moral be incidentally enforced, Shakespeare has suffered

the virtue of Cordelia to perish in a just cause, contrary to the

natural ideas of justice, to the hope of the reader, and, what is yet

more strange, to the faith of chronicles. Yet this conduct is justified

by _The Spectator_, who blames Tate for giving Cordelia success and

happiness in his alteration, and declares, that, in his opinion, _the

tragedy has lost half its beauty_. Dennis has remarked, whether justly

or not, that, to secure the favourable reception of _Cato, the town was

poisoned with much false and abominable criticism_, and that endeavours

had been used to discredit and decry poetical justice. A play in which

the wicked prosper, and the virtuous miscarry, may doubtless be good,

because it is a just representation of the common events of human life:

but since all reasonable beings naturally love justice, I cannot easily

be persuaded, that the observation of justice makes a play worse; or,

that if other excellencies are equal, the audience will not always rise

better pleased from the final triumph of persecuted virtue.

In the present case the public has decided. Cordelia, from the time of

Tate, has always retired with victory and felicity. And, if my

sensations could add any thing to the general suffrage, I night relate,

I was many years ago so shocked by Cordelia's death, that I know not

whether I ever endured to read again the last scenes of the play till I

undertook to revise them as an editor.

There is another controversy among the critics concerning this play. It

is disputed whether the predominant image in Lear's disordered mind be

the loss of his kingdom or the cruelty of his daughters. Mr. Murphy, a

very judicious critic, has evinced by induction of particular passages,

that the cruelty of his daughters is the primary source of his distress,

and that the loss of royalty affects him only as a secondary and

subordinate evil. He observes with great justness, that Lear would move

our compassion but little, did we not rather consider the injured father

than the degraded king.

The story of this play, except the episode of Edmund, which is derived,

I think, from Sidney, is taken originally from Geoffry of Monmouth, whom

Hollinshed generally copied; but perhaps immediately from an old

historical ballad. My reason for believing that the play was posterior

to the ballad, rather than the ballad to the play, is, that the ballad

has nothing of Shakespeare's nocturnal tempest, which is too striking to

have been omitted, and that it follows the chronicle; it has the

rudiments of the play, but none of its amplifications: it first hinted

Lear's madness, but did not array it in circumstances. The writer of the

ballad added something to the history, which is a proof that he would

have added more, if more had occurred to his mind, and more must have

occurred if he had seen Shakespeare. [Johnson appends "A lamentable SONG

of the Death of King Leir and his Three Daughters"]

Notes to Shakespeare, Volume III: The Tragedies · 第 188 / 253 题