THE BATTLE OF THE STANDARDS. THE ALLEGORY OF THE CLOCKS.

In an ancient village there once stood a gold clock, which, ever since

the invention of clocks had been the measure of time for the people of

that village. They were proud of its beauty, its workmanship, its

musical stroke, and the unfailing regularity with which it heralded the

passing hours. This clock had been endeared to all the inhabitants of

the village by the hallowed associations with which it was identified.

Generation after generation it had called the children from far and wide

to attend the village school, its fresh morning peal had set the honest

villagers to labor; its noon-day notes had called them to refreshment;

its welcome evening chime had summoned them to rest. From time

immemorial, on all festive occasions, it had rung out its merry tones to

assemble the young people on the green; and on the Sabbath it had

advertised to all the countryside the hour of worship in the village

church. So perfect was its mechanism that it never needed repair. So

proud were the people of this wonderful clock that it became the

standard for all the country round about, and the time which it kept

came to be known as the gold standard of time, which was universally

admitted to be correct and unchanging.

In the course of time there wandered that way a queer character, a

clockmaker, who being fully instructed in the inner workings of

time-tellers, and not having inherited the traditions of that village,

did not regard this clock with the veneration accorded to it by the

natives. To their astonishment he denied that there was really any such

thing as a gold standard of time; and in order to prove that the

material, gold, did not monopolize all the qualities characteristic of

clocks, he placed alongside the gold clock, another clock, of silver,

and set both clocks at 12 noon. For a long time the clocks ran along in

almost perfect accord, their only disagreement being that of an

occasional second or two, and even that disagreement only at rare

intervals, such as might naturally occur with the best of clocks. But

the Council of the village, in their admiration for the gold clock,

passed an ordinance requiring that all the weights (the motive power) of

the silver clock, except one, be removed from it, and attached to those

of the gold clock. Instantly the clocks began to fall apart, and one

day, as the sun was passing the meridian, the hands of the gold clock

were observed to indicate the hour of 1, while those of the silver clock

indicated 12.15. At this everybody in the village ridiculed the silver

clock, derided the silver standard, and hurled epithets at the

individual who had had the temerity to doubt the infallibility of the

gold standard.

Finally, the divergence between the clocks went so far that it was noon

by the gold standard when it was only 6 a. m. by the silver standard, so

that those who were guided by the gold standard, not withstanding that

it was yet the gray of the morning, insisted on eating their mid-day

meal, because the gold standard indicated that it must be noon. And when

the sun was high in the heavens, and its light was shining warm and

refulgent on the dusty streets of the village, those who observed the

gold standard had already eaten supper and were preparing for bed.

But this state of things could not last. It was clear that the

difference between the standards must be reconciled, or all industry

would be disarranged and the village ruined.

Discussion was rife among the villagers as to the cause of the

difference. Some said the silver clock had lost time; others that both

clocks had lost time, but the silver clock more than the gold; while

others again asserted that both clocks had gained time, but that the

gold clock had gained more than the silver clock.

While this discussion was at its height a philosopher came along and

observing the excitement on the subject remarked, "By measuring two

things, one against the other, you can never arrive at any determination

as to which has changed. Instead of disputing as to whether one clock

has lost or another gained would it not be well to consult the sun and

the stars and ascertain exactly what has happened."

Some demurred to this because, as they asserted, the gold standard was

unchanging and was always right no matter how much it might seem to be

wrong; others agreed that the philosopher's advice should be taken. Upon

consulting the sun and the stars it was discovered that what had

happened was that both clocks had gained in time but that the gain of

the silver clock had been very slight, while that of the gold clock had

been so great as to disturb all industry and destroy all correct sense

of time.

Notwithstanding this demonstration, there were many who adhered to the

belief that the gold standard was correct and unchanging, and insisted

that what appeared to be its aberrations were not in reality due to any

fault of the gold clock, but to some convulsion of nature by which the

solar system had been disarranged and the planets made to move

irregularly in their orbits.

Some of the people also remembered having heard at the village inn, from

travellers returning from the East, that silver clocks were the standard

of time in India and other barbarous countries, while in countries of a

more advanced civilization gold clocks were the standard. They therefore

feared that the use of the silver clock might have the effect of

degrading the civilization of the village by placing it alongside India

and other barbarous countries. And although the great mass of the people

really believed, from the demonstration made, that the silver standard

of time was the better one, yet this objection was so momentous that

they were puzzled what course to pursue, and at last advices were

consulting the manufacturers of gold clocks as to what was best to be

done.

Now our gold standard men are in the position of those who first refuse

to look at anything beyond the two things, gold and silver, to see what

has happened, and who, when it is finally demonstrated that all other

things retain their former relations to silver, still persist that the

law which makes gold an unchanging standard of measure is more immutable

than that which holds the stars in their courses. If they will compare

gold and silver with commodities in general, to see how the metals have

maintained their relations, not to one another but to all other things,

they will find that instead of a fall having taken place in the value of

silver, the change that has really taken place is a rise in the value of

both gold and silver, the rise in silver being relatively slight while

that of gold has been ruinously great. And those who do not shut their

eyes to the truth must see that the change of relation between the

metals has been effected by depriving silver of its legal-tender

function, as the want of accord between the clocks was brought about by

depriving the silver clock of a portion of its motive power--the

weights. The only thing that has prevented a greater divergency between

the metals is the limited coinage by the United States--the single

weight that, withheld from the gold clock, prevented its more ruinous

gain.

Money: Speech of Hon. John P. Jones, of Nevada, on the Free Coinage of Silver; in the United States Senate, May 12 and 13, 1890 · 第 38 / 165 题