"And do you think the free North has salt enough in it to save this

whole Southern mass from corruption? I wish I could think so; but all I

can see in the free North at present is a raging, tearing, headlong

chase after _money_. Now money is of significance only as it gives

people the power of expressing their ideal of life. And what does this

ideal prove to be among us? Is it not to ape all the splendors and vices

of old aristocratic society? Is it not to be able to live in idleness,

without useful employment, a life of glitter and flutter and show? What

do our New York dames of fashion seek after? To avoid family care, to

find servants at any price who will relieve them of home

responsibilities, and take charge of their houses and children while

they shine at ball and opera, and drive in the park. And the servants

who learn of these mistresses,--what do they seek after? _They_ seek

also to get rid of care, to live as nearly as possible without work, to

dress and shine in their secondary sphere, as the mistresses do in the

primary one. High wages with little work and plenty of company express

Biddy's ideal of life, which is a little more respectable than that of

her mistress, who wants high wages with no work. The house and the

children are not hers; and why should she care more for their well-being

than the mistress and the mother?

"Hence come wranglings and moanings. Biddy uses a chest of tea in three

months, and the amount of the butcher's bill is fabulous; Jane gives the

baby laudanum to quiet it, while she slips out to _her_ parties; and the

upper classes are shocked at the demoralized state of the Irish, their

utter want of faithfulness and moral principle! How dreadful that there

are no people who enjoy the self-denials and the cares which they

dislike, that there are no people who rejoice in carrying that burden of

duties which they do not wish to touch with one of their fingers! The

outcry about the badness of servants means just this: that everybody is

tired of self-helpfulness,--the servants as thoroughly as the masters

and mistresses. All want the cream of life, without even the trouble of

skimming; and the great fight now is, who shall drink the skim-milk,

which nobody wants, _Work_,--honorable toil,--manly, womanly

endeavor,--is just what nobody likes; and this is as much a fact in the

free North as in the slave South.

"What are all the young girls looking for in marriage? Some man with

money enough to save them from taking any care or having any trouble in

domestic life, enabling them, like the lilies of the field, to rival

Solomon in all his glory, while they toil not neither do they spin; and

when they find that even money cannot purchase freedom from care in

family life, because their servants are exactly of the same mind with

themselves, and hate to do their duties as cordially as they themselves

do, then are they in anguish of spirit, and wish for slavery, or

aristocracy, or anything that would give them power over the lower

classes."

"But surely, Mr. Theophilus," said Jennie, "there is no sin in disliking

trouble, and wanting to live easily and have a good time in one's

life,--it's so very natural."

"No sin, my dear, I admit; but there is a certain amount of work and

trouble that somebody must take, to carry on the family and the world;

and the mischief is, that all are agreed in wanting to get rid of it.

Human nature is, above all things, lazy. I am lazy myself. Everybody is.

The whole struggle of society is as to who shall eat the hard

bread-and-cheese of labor, which must be eaten by somebody. Nobody wants

it,--neither you in the parlor, nor Biddy in the kitchen.

"'The mass ought to labor, and _we_ lie on sofas,' is a sentence that

would unite more subscribers than any confession of faith that ever was

presented, whether religious or political; and its subscribers would be

as numerous and sincere in the Free States as in the Slave States, or I

am much mistaken in my judgment. The negroes are men and women, like any

of the rest of us, and particularly apt in the imitation of the ways and

ideas current in good society; and consequently to learn to play on the

piano, and to have nothing in particular to do, will be the goal of

aspiration among colored girls and women, and to do house-work will seem

to them intolerable drudgery, simply because it is so among the fair

models to whom they look up in humble admiration. You see, my dear, what

it is to live in a democracy. It deprives us of the vantage-ground on

which we cultivated people can stand and say to our neighbor,--'The

cream is for me, and the skim-milk for you; the white bread for me, and

the brown for you. I am born to amuse myself and have a good time, and

you are born to do everything that is tiresome and disagreeable to me.'

The 'My Lady Ludlows' of England can stand on their platform and

lecture the lower classes from the Church Catechism, to 'order

themselves lowly and reverently to all their betters'; and they can base

their exhortations on the old established law of society, by which some

are born to inherit the earth, and live a life of ease and pleasure, and

others to toil, without pleasure or amusement, for their support and

aggrandizement. An aristocracy, as I take it, is a combination of human

beings to divide life into two parts, one of which shall comprise all

social and moral ease, pleasure, and amusement,--and the other,

incessant toil, with the absence of every privilege and blessing of

human existence. Life thus divided, we aristocrats keep the good for

ourselves and our children, and distribute the evil as the lot of the

general mass of mankind. The desire to monopolize and to dominate is the

most rooted form of human selfishness; it is the hydra with many heads,

and, cut off in one place, it puts out in another.

"Nominally, the great aristocratic arrangement of American society has

just been destroyed; but really, I take it, the essential _animus_ of

the slave system still exists, and pervades the community, North as well

as South. Everybody is wanting to get the work done by somebody else,

and to take the money himself; the grinding between employers and

employed is going on all the time, and the field of controversy has only

been made wider by bringing in, a whole new class of laborers. The Irish

have now the opportunity to sustain their aristocracy over the negro.

Shall they not have somebody to look down upon?

"All through free society, employers and employed are at incessant feud;

and the more free and enlightened the society, the more bitter the feud.

The standing complaint of life in America is the badness of servants;

and England, which always follows at a certain rate behind us in our

social movements, is beginning to raise very loudly the same complaint.

The condition of service has been thought worthy of public attention in

some of the leading British prints; and Ruskin, in a summing up article,

speaks of it as a deep ulcer in society,--a thing hopeless of remedy."

"My dear Mr. Theophilus," said my wife, "I cannot imagine whither you

are rambling, or to what purpose you are getting up these horrible

shadows. You talk of the world as if there were no God in it, overruling

the selfishness of men, and educating it up to order and justice. I do

not deny that there is a vast deal of truth in what you say. Nobody

doubts, that, in general, human nature _is_ selfish, callous, unfeeling,

willing to engross all good to itself, and to trample on the rights of

others. Nevertheless, thanks to God's teaching and fatherly care, the

world has worked along to the point of a great nation founded on the

principles of strict equality, forbidding all monopolies, aristocracies,

privileged classes, by its very constitution; and now, by God's

wonderful providence, this nation has been brought, and forced, as it

were, to overturn and abolish the only aristocratic institution that

interfered with its free development. Does not this look as if a

Mightier Power than ours were working in and for us, supplementing our

weakness and infirmity? and if we believe that man is always ready to

drop everything and let it run back to evil, shall we not have faith

that God will _not_ drop the noble work He has so evidently taken in

hand in this nation?"

"And I want to know," said Jennie, "why your illustrations of

selfishness are all drawn from the female sex. Why do you speak of

_girls_ that marry for money, any more than men? of _mistresses_ of

families that want to be free from household duties and

responsibilities, rather that of masters?"

"My charming young lady," said Theophilus, "it is a fact that in

America, except the slaveholders, women have hitherto been the only

aristocracy. Women have been the privileged class,--the only one to

which our rough democracy has always end everywhere given the

precedence,--and consequently the vices of aristocrats are more

developed in them as a class than among men. The leading principle of

aristocracy, which is to take pay without work, to live on the toils and

earnings of others, is one which obtains more generally among women than

among men in this country. The men of our country, as a general thing,

even in our uppermost classes, always propose to themselves some work or

business by which they may acquire a fortune, or enlarge that already

made for them by their fathers. The women of the same class propose to

themselves nothing but to live at their ease on the money made for them

by the labors of fathers and husbands. As a consequence, they become

enervated and indolent,--averse to any bracing, wholesome effort, either

mental or physical. The unavoidable responsibilities and cares of a

family, instead of being viewed by them in the light of a noble

life-work, in which they do their part in the general labors of the

world, seem to them so many injuries and wrongs; they seek to turn them

upon servants, and find servants unwilling to take them; and so selfish

are they, that I have heard more than one lady declare that she didn't

care if it was unjust, she should like to have slaves rather than be

plagued with servants who had so much liberty. All the novels, poetry,

and light literature of the world, which form the general staple of

female reading, are based upon aristocratic institutions, and

impregnated with aristocratic ideas; and women among us are constantly

aspiring to foreign and aristocratic modes of life rather than to those

of native, republican simplicity. How many women are there, think you,

that would not go in for aristocracy and aristocratic prerogatives, if

they were only sure that they themselves should be of the privileged

class? To be 'My Lady Duchess,' and to have a right by that simple title

to the prostrate deference of all the lower orders! How many would have

firmness to vote against such an establishment merely because it was bad

for society? Tell the fair Mrs. Feathercap, 'In order that you may be a

duchess, and have everything a paradise of elegance and luxury around

you and your children, a hundred poor families must have no chance for

anything better than black bread and muddy water all their lives, a

hundred poor men must work all their lives on such wages that a

fortnight's sickness will send their families to the almshouse, and that

no amount of honesty and forethought can lay up any provision for old

age'"--

"Come now, Sir," said Jennie, "don't tell me that there any girls or

women so mean and selfish as to want aristocracy or rank so purchased!

You are too bad, Mr. Theophilus!"

"Perhaps they might not, were it stated in just these terms; yet I

think, if the question of the establishment of an order of aristocracy

among us were put to vote, we should find more women than men who would

go for it; and they would flout at the consequences to society with the

lively wit and the musical laugh which make feminine selfishness so

genteel and agreeable.

"No! It is a fact, that, in America, the women, in the wealthy classes,

are like the noblemen of aristocracies, and the men are the workers. And

in all this outcry that has been raised about women's wages being

inferior to those of men there is one thing overlooked,--and that is,

that women's work is generally inferior to that of men, because in every

rank they are the pets of society, and are excused from the laborious

drill and training by which men are fitted for their callings. Our fair

friends come in generally by some royal road to knowledge, which saves

them the dire necessity of real work,--a sort of feminine

hop-skip-and-jump into science or mechanical skill,--nothing like the

uncompromising hard labor to which the boy is put who would be a

mechanic or farmer, a lawyer or physician.

"I admit freely that we men are to blame for most of the faults of our

fair nobility. There is plenty of heroism, abundance of energy, and love

of noble endeavor lying dormant in these sheltered and petted daughters

of the better classes; but _we_keep it down and smother it. Fathers and

brothers think it discreditable to themselves not to give their

daughters and sisters the means of living in idleness; and any

adventurous fair one, who seeks to end the ennui of utter aimlessness by

applying herself to some occupation whereby she may earn her own living,

infallibly draws down on her the comments of her whole circle:--'Keeping

school, is she? Isn't her father rich enough to support her? What could

possess her?'"

"I am glad, my dear Sir Oracle, that you are beginning to recollect

yourself and temper your severities on our sex, said my wife. As usual,

there is much truth lying about loosely in the vicinity of your

assertions; but they are as far from being in themselves the truth as

would be their exact opposites.

"The class of American women who travel, live abroad, and represent our

country to the foreign eye, have acquired the reputation of being

Sybarites in luxury and extravagance, and there is much in the modes of

life that are creeping into our richer circles to justify this.

"Miss Murray, ex-maid-of-honor to the Queen of England, among other

impressions which she received from an extended tour through our

country, states it as her conviction that young American girls of the

better classes are less helpful in nursing the sick and in the general

duties of family life than the daughters of the aristocracy of England;

and I am inclined to believe it, because even the Queen has taken

special pains to cultivate habits of energy and self-helpfulness in her

children. One of the toys of the Princess Royal was said to be a cottage

of her own, furnished with every accommodation for cooking and

housekeeping, where she from time to time enacted the part of

housekeeper, making bread and biscuit, boiling potatoes which she

herself had gathered from her own garden-patch, and inviting her royal

parents to meals of her own preparing; and report says, that the

dignitaries of the German court have been horrified at the energetic

determination of the young royal housekeeper to overlook her own

linen-closets and attend to her own affairs. But, as an offset to what I

have been saying, it must be admitted that America is a country where a

young woman can be self-supporting without forfeiting her place in

society. All our New England and Western towns show us female teachers

who are as well received and as much caressed in society, and as often

contract advantageous marriages, as any women whatever; and the

productive labor of American women, in various arts, trades, and

callings, would be found, I think, not inferior to that of any women in

the world.

"Furthermore, the history of the late war has shown them capable of

every form of heroic endeavor. We have had hundreds of Florence

Nightingales, and an amount of real hard work has been done by female

hands not inferior to that performed by men in the camp and field, and

enough to make sure that American womanhood is not yet so enervated as

seriously to interfere with the prospects of free republican society."

"I wonder," said Jennie, "what it is in our country that spoils the

working-classes that come into it. They say that the emigrants, as they

land here, are often simple-hearted people, willing to work, accustomed

to early hours and plain living, decorous and respectful in their

manners. It would seem as if aristocratic drilling had done them good.

In a few months they become brawling, impertinent, grasping, want high

wages, and are very unwilling to work. I went to several

intelligence-offices the other day to look for a girl for Marianne, and

I thought, by the way the candidates catechized the ladies, and the airs

they took upon them, that they considered themselves the future

mistresses interrogating their subordinates.

"'Does ye expect me to do the washin' with the cookin'?'

"'Yes.'

"'Thin I'll niver go to that place!'

"'And does ye expect me to get the early breakfast for yer husband to

be off in the train every mornin'?'

"'Yes.'

"'I niver does that,--that ought to be a second girl's work.'

"'How many servants does ye keep, Ma'am?'

"'Two.'

"'I niver lives with people that keeps but two servants.'

"'How many has ye in yer family?'

"'Seven.'

"'That's too large a family. Has ye much company?'

"'Yes, we have company occasionally.'

"'Thin I can't come to ye; it'll be too harrd a place.'

"In fact, the thing they were all in quest of seemed to be a very small

family, with very high wages, and many perquisites and privileges.

"This is the kind of work-people our manners and institutions make of

people that come over here. I remember one day seeing a coachman touch

his cap to his mistress when she spoke to him, as is the way in Europe,

and hearing one or two others saying among themselves,--

"'That chap's a greenie; he'll get over that soon.'"

"All these things show," said I, "that the staff of power has passed

from the hands of gentility into those of labor. We may think the

working-classes somewhat unseemly in their assertion of self-importance;

but, after all, are they, considering their inferior advantages of

breeding, any more overbearing and impertinent than the upper classes

have always been to them in all ages and countries?

"When Biddy looks long, hedges in her work with many conditions, and is

careful to get the most she can for the least labor, is she, after all,

doing any more than you or I or all the rest of the world? I myself will

not write articles for five dollars a page, when there are those who

will give me fifteen. I would not do double duty as an editor on a

salary of seven thousand, when I could get ten thousand for less work.

"Biddy and her mistress are two human beings, with the same human wants.

Both want to escape trouble, to make their life comfortable and easy,

with the least outlay of expense. Biddy's capital is her muscles and

sinews; and she wants to get as many greenbacks in exchange for them as

her wit and shrewdness will enable her to do. You feel, when you bargain

with her, that she is nothing to you, except so far as her strength and

knowledge may save you care and trouble; and she feels that you are

nothing to her, except so far as she can get your money for her work.

The free-and-easy airs of those seeking employment show one thing,--that

the country in general is prosperous, and that openings for profitable

employment are so numerous that it is not thought necessary to try to

conciliate favor. If the community were at starvation-point, and the

loss of a situation brought fear of the almshouse, the laboring-class

would be more subservient. As it is, there is a little spice of the

bitterness of a past age of servitude in their present attitude,--a

bristling, self-defensive impertinence, which will gradually smooth away

as society learns to accommodate itself to the new order of things."

"Well, but, papa," said Jennie, "don't you think all this a very severe

test, if applied to us women particularly, more than to the men? Mr.

Theophilus seems to think women are aristocrats, and go for enslaving

the lower classes out of mere selfishness; but I say that we are a great

deal more strongly tempted than men, because all these annoyances and

trials of domestic life come upon us. It is very insidious, the

aristocratic argument, as it appeals to us; there seems much to be said

in its favor. It does appear to me that it is better to have servants

and work-people tidy, industrious, respectful, and decorous, as they are

in Europe, than domineering, impertinent, and negligent, as they are

here,--and it seems that there is something in our institutions that

produces these disagreeable traits: and I presume that the negroes will

eventually be travelling the same road as the Irish, and from the same

influences.

"When people see all these things, and feel all the inconveniences of

them, I don't wonder that they are tempted not to like democracy, and to

feel as if aristocratic institutions made a more agreeable state of

society. It is not such a blank, bald, downright piece of brutal

selfishness as Mr. Theophilus there seems to suppose, for us to wish

there were some quiet, submissive, laborious lower class, who would be

content to work for kind treatment and moderate wages."

"But, my little dear," said I, "the matter is not left to our choice.

Wish it or not wish it, it's what we evidently can't have. The day for

that thing is past. The power is passing out of the hands of the

cultivated few into those of the strong, laborious many. _Numbers_ is

the king of our era; and he will reign over us, whether we will hear or

whether we will forbear. The sighers for an obedient lower class and the

mourners for slavery may get ready their crape, and have their

pocket-handkerchiefs bordered with black; for they have much weeping to

do, and for many years to come. The good old feudal times, when two

thirds of the population thought themselves born only for the honor,

glory, and profit of the other third, are gone, with all their beautiful

devotions, all their trappings of song and story. In the land where such

institutions were most deeply rooted and most firmly established, they

are assailed every day by hard hands and stout hearts; and their

position resembles that of some of the picturesque ruins of Italy, which

are constantly being torn away to build prosaic modern shops and houses.

"This great democratic movement is coming down into modern society with

a march as irresistible as the glacier moves down from the mountains.

Its front is in America,--and beyond are England, France, Italy,

Prussia, and the Mohammedan countries. In all, the rights of the

laboring masses are a living force, bearing slowly and inevitably all

before it. Our war has been a marshalling of its armies, commanded by a

hard-handed, inspired man of the working-class. An intelligent American,

recently resident in Egypt, says it was affecting to notice the interest

with which the working-classes there were looking upon our late struggle

in America, and the earnestness of their wishes for the triumph of the

Union. 'It is our cause, it is for us,' they said, as said the

cotton-spinners of England and the silk-weavers of Lyons. The forces of

this mighty movement are still directed by a man from the lower orders,

the sworn foe of exclusive privileges and landed aristocracies. If Andy

Johnson is consistent with himself, with the principles which raised him

from a tailor's bench to the head of a mighty nation, he will see to it

that the work that Lincoln began is so thoroughly done, that every man

and every woman in America, of whatever race or complexion, shall have

exactly equal rights before the law, and be free to rise or fall

according to their individual intelligence, industry, and moral worth.

So long as everything is not strictly in accordance with our principles

of democracy, so long as there is in any part of the country an

aristocratic upper class who despise labor, and a laboring lower class

that is denied equal political rights, so long this grinding and discord

between the two will never cease in America. It will make trouble not

only in the South, but in the North,--trouble between all employers and

employed,--trouble in every branch and department of labor,--trouble in

every parlor and every kitchen.

The Atlantic Monthly, Volume 17, No. 99, January, 1866 A Magazine of Literature, Science, Art, and Politics · 第 14 / 19 段