REMARKS TO STRIKERS’ COMMITTEE, CHICAGO, ILL., MAY 10, 1905

_Mr. Shea_:

We are here as a committee to present to you a statement stating our

position in this controversy between the Employers’ Association and the

Teamsters’ Association. We have understood that they had asked your aid

for bringing troops into Chicago. We want to present our position to

you. Mr. Quinn has the memorial.

_Mr. Quinn_:

It will take about ten minutes to read this. Perhaps we had better

leave it with you.

_The President_, after reading the memorial:

Mr. Shea, Mr. Quinn, and Gentlemen:

I have read the petition you have presented to me, the conclusion of

which is a request for a hearing before any action be taken by the

Federal President, relating to the Chicago strike situation. As yet no

suggestion of any kind has come to me from any source that I should

take any action. Of the merits of the case I am wholly ignorant. I have

no knowledge of what the situation is, or of what steps should properly

be taken to end it. I feel, however, that in view of one statement, or

series of statements, in your letter, I ought to say this: I regret

that you should have in the letter spoken at all of the use of the

Federal army as you have there spoken. No request has been made to me

for action by the Federal Government, but at the same time, Mr. Shea,

as you have in this communication to me brought up that fact, I want to

say one thing with all the emphasis in my power. In upholding law and

order, in doing what he is able to do to suppress mob violence in any

shape or way, the Mayor of Chicago, Mayor Dunne, has my hearty support.

I am glad to be able to say this to you gentlemen before I say it to

any other body. Now let me repeat that I know nothing of the facts of

the situation. I know nothing of the rights or wrongs of the points at

issue. What I have to say is based purely upon what I regard as the

unfortunate phrasing of a letter presented to the President of the

United States. I have not been called upon to interfere in any way,

but you must not misunderstand my attitude. In every effort of Mayor

Dunne to prevent violence by mobs or individuals, to see that the laws

are obeyed and that order is preserved, he has the hearty support of

the President of the United States, and in my judgment he should have

that of every good citizen of the United States.

Now, gentlemen, it has been a great pleasure to see you, and I am glad

to have had the chance to say this to you.

_Mr. Quinn_:

Mr. President, what prompted us to come to you with this statement is

that for the past two or three weeks there has been a continual howl

for the Federal army. I have known you long enough to know that you

would not respond to a one-sided demand, that you will not respond

until you have thoroughly investigated the case.

_The President_:

Mr. Quinn, as yet the Mayor has not made any appeal to the Governor,

and therefore, of course, the Governor has made none to me; and as yet

nothing in the situation has demanded action by me.

_Mr. Shea_:

Let me explain that. The Governor has been requested by the committee

of the employers to demand Federal troops. The statement has been made

in the papers. I immediately telegraphed Governor Deneen that we would

allow him to appoint a commission.

Regardless of that I want to make our position known to you in regard

to mob violence. Every time a mob congregates, every act of violence

performed by either a union man or a sympathizer, it reacts to our

detriment. I believe that we are skilled workmen enough in our

particular craft to demonstrate to our business men of Chicago that

it is to their interest to employ us. There is nothing at stake but

the re-employment of citizens of Chicago who have been forced out of

their positions. Acts of violence meet with the condemnation of the

officials, both local and national, of our organization. It does not

meet with the sympathies of our organization. I simply want to say that

we want to be fair, to preserve the business interests of Chicago,

realizing that the prosperity of our employers is our prosperity.

_The President_:

Mr. Shea, I can only repeat what I have said. I am a believer in

unions. I am an honorary member of one union. But the union must obey

the law just as the corporation must obey the law, just as every man,

rich or poor, must obey the law. As yet no action whatever has been

called for by me, and most certainly if action is called for by me I

shall try to do exact justice under the law to every man, so far as

I have power. But the first essential is the preservation of law and

order, the suppression of violence by mobs or individuals.

AT THE UNVEILING OF THE STATUE OF GENERAL HENRY W. SLOCUM,

BROOKLYN, N. Y., MAY 30, 1905

_Mr. Mayor, Mr. Commissioner, and you, my Fellow Citizens, and, above

all, you who took part in the great war in which the man whose statue

is raised to-day won for himself and his country renown and honor_:

Day before yesterday I listened to a sermon in which the preacher,

dwelling upon the exercises to be held throughout the Union to-day,

preached on the text which tells of the altar raised by command of

Moses to commemorate the victory gained by the children of Israel over

the wild tribes of the desert who sought to bar their march toward

the promised land. Amalek came out against Israel and they fought all

day, while Aaron and Hur upheld the hands of Moses until as night fell

the sun went down on Israel’s triumph. Then they raised an altar to

“Jehovah is my banner”; to Jehovah, who stood as the exponent of the

principle for which Israel warred. They raised it to the principle of

righteousness, which alone can justify any war or any struggle. Mr.

Mayor, that is the thought that you developed in the excellent address

to which we have just listened; that we meet to-day to commemorate

a great victory, the triumph of the cause of union and liberty, not

primarily because it was a mere victory, but because it was a victory

for righteousness and for the peace and liberty and eternal spiritual

welfare of mankind.

I see before me here men who won high honor serving as comrades in arms

of General Slocum, and I know that there exists in the Union no men who

will appreciate more the fact that now, forty years after the war, the

crowning triumph of what they did is to be found in the fact that we

have a genuinely reunited country, a country in which the man who wore

the blue stretches out the hand of loyal friendship to his erstwhile

foe, his now devoted friend and fellow-countryman, the man who wore

the gray. A short while ago I passed through the great State of Texas.

Wherever I stopped in that great State I was greeted by representatives

of the Grand Army marching side by side with or intermingled with men

clad in the gray uniform that showed that they had fought in the armies

of the Confederacy. They had tested one another’s worth on the stricken

fields, they knew each that the other had been ready when the hour of

supreme appeal came to show his truth by his endeavors. Now these men,

now you and those like you, now the men in blue and the men in gray,

know that they leave to their children and their children’s children as

a heritage of honor forever the memory of the great deeds done alike by

those who fought under Grant and by those who fought under Lee; for we,

because of the very fact that the Union triumphed now have the right

to feel a like pride in the valor and devotion of those who valiantly

fought against the stars in their courses, no less than of those who

finally saw their efforts and their sufferings crowned by triumph.

Think of it, my fellow-countrymen! Think of what a thrice-blessed

fortune is ours, that the greatest war that the nineteenth century

saw after the close of the Napoleonic struggles has left, not as most

wars inevitably do and must leave, memories of bitterness and anger

and shame to offset the memories of glory, memories which make the men

of one side hang their heads because the men of the other side walk

exultingly; that it has left not such dreadful memories, but instead

to victor and vanquished alike, after the temporary soreness is over,

the same right to feel the proudest satisfaction in the fact that the

Union was saved, and the utmost pride in the honor, the gallantry, the

devotion to the right as each side had given it the light to see the

right, shown alike by those who warred under one banner and by those

who warred under the other.

I congratulate the people of Brooklyn, not primarily upon raising

this statue, because that they ought to do, but upon the opportunity,

upon the chance of having it to raise. I congratulate them upon the

good fortune of having a fellow-citizen who in war and in peace alike

served his people so well as to make it their duty, not so much to

him as to themselves, to erect this statue that it might serve as a

lesson for the generations to come. And, my fellow-citizens, I am sure

we all realize the peculiar appropriateness of having the statue of

General Slocum received on behalf of the city of New York by its chief

magistrate, whose father was General Slocum’s illustrious commander.

Surely there is need for me to say but little in emphasis of what has

been set forth before I began to speak as to the prime significance

of General Slocum’s career. He was a fine soldier, a gallant and able

commander. Once the war was over he turned as whole-heartedly to

the pursuits of peace as he had during the war turned to the strife

of arms. General Slocum was one of those men on whose career we are

fortunately able to dwell in its entirety. We do not have to dwell

with emphasis on part of it because we do not care to speak of another

part of it. We are able to point to General Slocum as the type of what

a decent American citizen should be, as a man who was an example in

his family life, an example in his business relations, an honest and

upright public servant, no less than a tried and fearless soldier.

Now I want our people to remember the two sides of the lesson taught

by General Slocum’s life. A successful war for unrighteousness is the

most dreadful of all things; it is the thing that sets back more than

aught else the course of civilization. But no people worth preserving

ever existed or will exist that was not able to fight well if the

need arose. So it is with the individual. The man who possesses great

ability and great courage unaccompanied by the moral sense, a courage

and ability unguided by the stern purpose to do what is just and

upright, that man is rendered by the very fact of his courage and

ability only so much the greater menace to the community in which he

unfortunately dwells. We can not afford as a people ever to forget for

one moment that ability, farsightedness, iron resolution, perseverance,

willingness to do and dare, are qualities to be admired only if they

are put at the service of the right, at the service of decency and of

justice. The man who possesses those qualities and does not shape his

course by a fundamental and underlying moral principle is a menace to

each and all of us; and thrice foolish, thrice wicked is the other man

who condones his moral shortcomings because of his intellectual or

physical strength and prowess.

But it is equally important to remember that no amount of good

intention, no amount of sweetness and light, no amount of appreciation

of decency avails in the least in the rough work of the world as we

find it, unless back of the honesty of purpose, back of the decency

of life and thought, lies the power that makes a man a man. This is

true of the individual and it is true of the Nation. It is absolutely

essential that this Nation, if it is to hold the position in the future

that it has held in the past, must act not only within but without

its own borders in a spirit of justice and of large generosity toward

all other peoples. We owe this as an obligation to ourselves, we owe

it as an obligation to all mankind. More and more as we increase in

strength I hope to see a corresponding increase in the sober sense

of responsibility which shall prevent us either injuring or insulting

any other people. You may notice that I said “insulting” as well as

“injuring.” If there is one quality sometimes shown among us which

is not commendable it is the habit of speaking loosely about foreign

powers, foreign races. You do not need any of you to be told that

in private life you will often resent an insult quite as much as an

injury; and our public speakers and writers need to steadily keep

before their minds the thought that no possible good can come to us by

speaking offensively of any one else; while trouble may come.

It has been well said that the surest way for a nation to invite

disaster is to be opulent, aggressive, and unarmed. Now, we are

opulent, and I hope we shall remain so. I trust that we shall never be

aggressive unless aggression is not merely justified, but demanded;

demanded either by our own self-respect or by the interests of mankind.

But above all, let us remember that to be aggressive in speech or act,

and not to be armed, invites not merely disaster, but the contempt of

mankind.

Brooklyn not only furnished valiant soldiers to the Civil War, but it

furnished in time of peace a most excellent Secretary of the Navy of

the United States, General Tracy. If our navy is good enough, we have

a long career of peace before us. The only likelihood of trouble ever

coming to us as a nation will arise if we let our navy become too small

or inefficient. A first-class navy—first-class in point of size, above

all first-class in point of efficiency of the individual units acting

as units and in combination—is the surest and the cheapest guarantee

of peace. I should think that any man looking at what is happening and

what has happened abroad and in our own history during the past few

years, must be indeed blind if he can not read that lesson clearly.

General Slocum did his first great public service when the crisis

called not primarily for the softer and milder, but for the sterner and

harder virtues; and we can not afford in this day of material luxury,

in this day when civilization tends to make life easy, to ignore those

hard and stern virtues. In the workaday world as it is, not only in

war, but in private life and in public life alike, a man has to have

toughness of fibre or he can not put into effect even the best of

intentions. We can not afford to let the generation that is coming grow

up with the feeling that any quality will serve as a substitute for the

old, essential qualities of manliness in a man and womanliness in a

woman.

Much, very much, has been done in this country by education. No one

can overstate the debt that this country is under to the educators;

but in taking advantage of all the improved methods let us not forget

that there are certain qualities which are not new, which are eternal

because they are eternally true, the failure to develop which will

cause a loss that can not be offset by any merely intellectual or

mental gain. A sound body is a first-class thing, a sound mind is

an even better thing, but the thing that counts for most in the

individual as in the Nation is character—the sum of those qualities

which make a man a good man and a woman a good woman. You men of the

Civil War, you men to whom this country owes more than to any others,

no matter how great the service of those others may be (because to you

this country owes its life), you won the place you did, you won for

this country its salvation, because you had in you those qualities

which in the aggregate we know by the name of character, the qualities

which made you put material gain, material well-being, not merely

below, but immeasurably below devotion to an ideal, when the crisis

called for showing your manhood.

You went to the war leaving those behind who would make more money, but

carrying with you in your hearts the honor and the future of a mighty

Nation. You had, in the first place, the right spirit, and then you had

the quality of making that spirit evident in the time of need. If you

had not had patriotism, devotion to the country and to the flag, you

could have done nothing. But you could not have done much more if your

patriotism, your devotion to the flag, had not been backed up by the

power to show that your metal rang true in battle.

You showed in times that tried men’s souls what this country has a

right to expect from its sons. You had the supreme good fortune to test

your manhood in one of the two great crises of the Nation’s history,

the great crisis in which the Nation was born in the days of 1776, and

the no less great crisis in which the Nation was saved by the men of

1861. You have left us not merely a reunited country, but you have

left us the glorious heritage of the memory of the exploits, of the

qualities by which the country was left reunited.

Our days have fallen, for our good fortune, in times of peace. We have

not had to show the qualities that you showed in the dark years that

closed in the sunburst of Appomattox; but if we are to leave undimmed

to our children the heritage that you left to us, we must show in

peace, and, should the need ever arise, in war also, the qualities that

you showed; the qualities that make it now the pleasantest of all tasks

for a public servant who appreciates the greatness of America to come

on an occasion like this and see the people of a great city dedicate

a monument in honor of a great citizen, who, at every point of his

career, illustrated what the name American should be when it is used in

its highest, its deepest, and its best significance.

Presidential addresses and state papers, Volume 4 (of 7) · 第 37 / 72 题