WHY IT IS SO DRY.

We _thought_ it had something to do with a lack of moisture in the air;

and now, along comes Monsieur PROU, another philosopher, and merely says

what we had thought. He declares that there was so much ice last winter

(come now, gentlemen of the Ice Companies, what have you to say to

that?) it couldn't melt in time to evaporate in time to supply moisture

in time for the necessary showers. (Somehow, there's an eternity of

"time" in that sentence; but _n'importe: allons!_) We think PROU has

proved his case. And, although we can't quite sympathise with his

suggestion that detachments of sappers and miners be employed in the

spring-time, in Arctic (and doubtless also Antarctic) regions, in

blowing up icebergs and otherwise facilitating the operations of old

Sol, we give the ingenious Frenchman credit for at least as much

philosophic acumen as we ourselves possess: and Heaven only knows how

superb a compliment we thus convey!

Couldn't our friend Capt. HALL be requested to watch the Pole a little

next winter, and look into this idea of ours and PROU'S?

* * * * *

[Illustration: CIRCUMSTANCES WILL COMPEL THE STATELIEST OF MEN TO STOOP,

SOMETIMES. GETTING A LIGHT FROM THE STUMP OF A NEWSBOY'S CIGAR IS ONE OF

THEM.]

* * * * *

[Illustration: A SCENE FROM OLD NICK-OLOS NICK-OLBY.

Punchinello, Volume 1, No. 24, September 10, 1870 · 第 33 / 55 题