CHAPTER I.

NATURAL STABILITY

AND

THE PARACHUTE PRINCIPLE

IN AEROPLANES

BY

W. LEMAITRE

_Hon. Sec., Aeroplane Building and Flying Society_

WITH 34 ILLUSTRATIONS

LONDON

E. & F. N. SPON, LTD., 57 HAYMARKET

New York

SPON & CHAMBERLAIN, 123 LIBERTY STREET

1911

CONTENTS

PAGE

FRONTISPIECE iv

PREFACE ix

CHAPTER

I. THE IMPORTANCE OF STABILITY 11

II. SPEED AS A MEANS OF STABILITY 14

III. THE LOW CENTRE OF GRAVITY 17

IV. SHORT SPAN AND AREA 28

V. VARIABLE SPEED AND THE PARACHUTE PRINCIPLE 36

VI. THE DESIGN WHICH FULFILS THE CONDITIONS 39

PREFACE

Since there is nothing new under the sun, it is useless to pretend

that there is anything new in the design here advocated or the

theories advanced. Both are rather the result of a commonsense

consideration of the different points of all flying machines, natural

and artificial, and an endeavour to select from the great number of

good points those which seem most likely to blend together into a

practical machine. The conclusions reached are the result of a quite

independent investigation, carried on over three years by means of

numberless experiments, and the writer has endeavoured to make no

single statement which he cannot by some experiment amply prove.

NATURAL STABILITY IN AEROPLANES

CHAPTER I.

THE IMPORTANCE OF STABILITY.

In considering the whole question of aviation, it becomes evident that

the one point to strive for at the present juncture is stability. If

we are ever to have a practical flying machine, that is, a machine

which we can use as we do a yacht, a motor car, or a bicycle, it must

be one that we can trust to keep its balance by reason of the natural

forces embodied in it, and without any effort of control on the part

of the pilot. It may be objected that a bicycle does not do this, and

this is true, but, on the other hand, the upsetting of a bicycle is a

very small matter, whereas the tilting of an aeroplane mostly means

sudden death to its occupant, and it is probable that if the same

consequences followed the tilting of a bicycle, bicycles would soon

have been made with four wheels.

At present aeroplanes are the most unstable of all things. The least

gust, the least shifting of weight, the slightest difference in the

density of the strata of the supporting air, and the machine sways,

and if not instantly corrected by the pilot the sway becomes a tilt,

the tilt a dive, and the rest is silence. The first aeroplanes, the

Wrights’ for instance, were so unstable that twenty minutes in one of

them was as much as the most iron-nerved man could stand, the

continual strain being too exhausting to keep up for any length of

time. By throwing out extensions and outriggers in all directions we

have altered that to a certain extent, but only to an extent--we have

not yet got rid of it. The monoplane is probably the most unstable, as

might be expected from its smaller surface, but the bi-plane runs it

pretty closely.

And the difficulty seems to arise chiefly from the fact that the

machines are built round the propeller. In the case of a yacht or a

car, the machine is built first and the propelling means is fitted on

as an auxiliary. The consequence is that an aeroplane which is safe

enough while the propeller is exerting a tractive force of some 250

lbs., becomes, the moment this power is for any reason stopped, merely

a shapeless construction at the mercy of the wind and the force of

gravitation. It is true that most machines may be made to glide if the

pilot is clever enough and quick enough to steer them into the proper

gliding angle, but the machine that will naturally and by reason of

its design assume its proper gliding angle when the propelling force

is withdrawn, has not yet been built.

Such a machine would have “Natural Stability.”

It will be recognized that this natural stability, which depends on

the design of the machine, is something entirely different from

“automatic stability” of which there are many systems, all having this

one defect; that, depending upon working devices, movable planes,

gyroscopes, compensating balancers, pendulums, etc., they are all

liable to go wrong and refuse to act the moment a sudden strain makes

their perfect action most important.

Considering that the propeller is the only means the aeroplane has of

keeping in the air at all, the question arises: Is it possible to

design a machine that will be stable to the extent of descending

safely when the propeller stops, and that will yet be a good and

speedy flyer?

That is the problem we have to solve.

Natural Stability and the Parachute Principle in Aeroplanes · 第 1 / 6 章