POTTERY

[Illustration: FIG. 7.—Decorated handled cup, Black Diamond Ranch. 5½

by 4 inches.]

Brief mention of ceramic objects found in the area considered in this

review is here introduced because they substantiate the evidences of

the buildings concerning the relationship of prehistoric people in

this neighborhood. Moreover, they add to our limited knowledge of the

arts in a little-known area. Very little has been recorded concerning

pottery from the ruins near Gallup, but the few known specimens do not

bear a sufficiently specialized symbolism to separate them from others

found in different geographical areas. Evidently no distinctive ceramic

area was developed in this region. Attention, however, may be called

to the fact that the symbols on pottery (fig. 7) represent the oldest

types, and that geometrical designs rather than conventional animal

figures predominate. The pottery suggests Zuñi ware, but is radically

different from modern Zuñi and has different symbols, showing, as far

as it goes, that settlements in which it occurs were made prior to the

development of modern Zuñi ceramic decorations which were influenced by

them. It has a likeness to old Zuñi ware, but has a closer resemblance

to fragments from the Crown Point Ruin, and the Chaco settlements,

which is significant.

[Illustration: FIG. 8.—Cooking pot, Black Diamond Ranch. 7½ by 6

inches.]

Perhaps the most exceptional specimens obtained during the author’s

trip are two large, black jars (fig. 8), their color recalling Santa

Clara ware. The decoration on these jars takes the form of designs on

a raised zigzag band meandering about their necks, similar to pottery

used by the Navaho Indians. The informant, a reliable white man, claims

they are not Navaho work, and showed the locality near a ruined ancient

wall where he excavated them. He also reports a portion of a human

skeleton found in the same neighborhood which affords good indication

that they were mortuary, while the position of the grave would show

that they were deposited by the same people who inhabited the room

near by. The question is pertinent, however, whether they were not a

modern secondary burial; but if we accept this theory it indicates an

unusual condition, for the Navaho seldom bury their pottery as mortuary

offerings.[13]

The author noticed, especially in his examination of the mounds near

Kit Carson Spring, certain foundation walls indicating small, circular,

buildings strung along in a row on the tops of ridges. One or two of

these suggest a round ruin near Zuñi, and seem to afford the missing

link in the prehistoric chain of settlements connecting the great

Chaco ruins[14] with some of those in Zuñi valley. These important

similarities are supported by the traditions of the Zuñi that some of

their ancestors once inhabited the buildings on the Chaco; and the fact

that certain ruins, among them Kintiel, north of Navaho Springs, are

definitely claimed by the Zuñi to have been inhabited by their Corn

clan.

[Illustration: FIG. 9.—Decorative food bowl, Black Diamond Ranch. 7 by

3 inches.]

The black and white pottery, found about Gallup, is identical with

that of the latter ruin, and very similar to that generally found in

the earliest epoch of pueblo occupancy. As pointed out in an article

on Zuñi pottery, in the “Putnam Anniversary Volume,” modern Zuñi

pottery is so different from the ancient that we can hardly regard

it as evolved from it. The same is true among the Hopi; the modern

pottery decoration is not like the old, but is Tewa. Hopi-Tewa pottery

is largely the work of Nampeo, who once decorated her pottery solely

with Tewa symbols instead of old Hopi. In 1895 she abandoned the Tewa

symbols of her people to meet a demand for old pottery and substituted

for Tewa designs copies of ancient Hopi pottery from Sikyatki. Thus

there have been two radical changes in the style of Hopi pottery since

1710; one the substitution of Tewa designs for old Hopi, the other

a return to Sikyatki motifs within the last 20 years. This modern

innovation, however, has not been derived from the ancient by any

evolution, but by acculturation. Possibly a similar change has taken

place at Zuñi, calling for caution in supposing that pottery found in

the refuse heaps is necessarily evolved from that preexisting or found

in strata below it.

[Illustration: FIG. 10.—Decorated handled cup, Black Diamond Ranch. 6⅜

by 5¼ inches.]

The author has seen no evidence that would lead him to abandon the

theory, that the Zuñi valley was once peopled by clans related to those

on Little Colorado derived from the Gila, and that other clans drifted

into the valley from the north at a later date. These later additions

were from the circular ruin belt. Later came Tewa clans as the Asa of

the Hopi, and others. The author finds more evidences of acculturation

than autochthonous evolution in modern Zuñi, as in modern Hopi ceramic

symbols. Pottery (figs. 9, 10) found in ruins about Gallup belongs

to the same type as that from Kintiel which Cushing, from legendary

evidences, found to have been settled by Zuñi clans.[15]

Archeological investigations in New Mexico, Colorado, and Utah · 第 14 / 39 题