V.—JOAN OF ARC.

On the 6th of January, 1428, at Domremy, a little village in the valley

of the Meuse, between Neufchâtel and Vaucouleurs, on the edge of the

frontier from Champagne to Lorraine, the young daughter of simple

tillers-of-the-soil “of good life and repute, herself a good, simple,

gentle girl, no idler, occupied hitherto in sewing or spinning with

her mother or driving afield her parent’s sheep and sometimes even,

when her father’s turn came round, keeping for him the whole flock of

the commune,” was fulfilling her sixteenth year. It was Joan of Arc,

whom all her neighbors called Joannette. Her early childhood was passed

amidst the pursuits characteristic of a country life; her behavior was

irreproachable, and she was robust, active, and intrepid. Her imagination

becoming inflamed by the distressed situation of France, she dreamed that

she had interviews with St. Margaret, St. Catherine, and St. Michael, who

commanded her, in the name of God, to go and raise the siege of Orleans,

and conduct Charles to be crowned at Rheims. Accordingly she applied to

Robert de Baudricourt, captain of the neighboring town of Vaucouleurs,

revealing to him her inspiration, and conjuring him not to neglect the

voice of God, which spoke through her. This officer for some time treated

her with neglect; but at length, prevailed on by repeated importunities,

he sent her to the king at Chinon, to whom, when introduced, she said:

“Gentle Dauphin, my name is Joan the Maid, the King of Heaven hath sent

me to your assistance; if you please to give me troops, by the grace of

God and the force of arms, I will raise the siege of Orleans, and conduct

you to be crowned at Rheims, in spite of your enemies.” Her requests

were now granted; she was armed _cap-a-pie_, mounted on horseback, and

provided with a suitable retinue. Previous to her attempting any exploit,

she wrote a long letter to the young English monarch, commanding him

to withdraw his forces from France, and threatening his destruction in

case of refusal. She concluded with “hear this advice from God and _la

Pucelle_.”

But, side by side with these friends, she had an adversary in the king’s

favorite, George de la Trémoille, an ambitious courtier, jealous of any

one who seemed within the range of the king’s good graces, and opposed to

a vigorous prosecution of the war, since it hampered him in the policy

he wished to keep up toward the duke of Burgundy. To the ill-will of

La Trémoille was added that of the majority of courtiers enlisted in

the following of the powerful favorite, and that of warriors irritated

at the importance acquired at their expense by a rustic and fantastic

little adventuress. Here was the source of the enmities and intrigues

which stood in the way of all Joan’s demands, rendered her successes

more tardy, difficult, and incomplete, and were one day to cost her more

dearly still.

At the end of about five weeks the expedition was in readiness. It was

a heavy convoy of revictualment protected by a body of ten or twelve

thousand men commanded by Marshal de Boussac, and numbering amongst

them Xaintrailles and La Hire. The march began on the 27th of April,

1429. Joan had caused the removal of all women of bad character, and

had recommended her comrades to confess. She took the communion in the

open air, before their eyes; and a company of priests, headed by her

chaplain, Pasquerel, led the way whilst chanting sacred hymns. Great

was the surprise amongst the men-at-arms. Many had words of mockery on

their lips. It was the time when La Hire used to say, “If God were a

soldier, he would turn robber.” Nevertheless, respect got the better of

habit; the most honorable were really touched; the coarsest considered

themselves bound to show restraint. On the 29th of April they arrived

before Orleans. But, in consequence of the road they had followed, the

Loire was between the army and the town; the expeditionary corps had to

be split in two; the troops were obliged to go and feel for the bridge

of Blois in order to cross the river; and Joan was vexed and surprised.

Dunois, arrived from Orleans in a little boat, urged her to enter the

town that same evening. “Are you the bastard of Orleans?” asked she, when

he accosted her. “Yes; and I am rejoiced at your coming.” “Was it you who

gave counsel for making me come hither by this side of the river and not

the direct way, over yonder where Talbot and the English were?” “Yes;

such was the opinion of the wisest captains.”

Joan’s first undertaking was against Orleans, which she entered without

opposition on the 29th of April, 1429, on horseback, completely armed,

preceded by her own banner, and having beside her Dunois, and behind

her the captains of the garrison and several of the most distinguished

burgesses of Orleans, who had gone out to meet her. The population, one

and all, rushed thronging round her, carrying torches, and greeting her

arrival “with joy as great as if they had seen God come down amongst

them.” With admirable good sense, discovering the superior merits of

Dunois, the bastard of Orleans, a celebrated captain, she wisely adhered

to his instructions; and by constantly harassing the English, and beating

up their intrenchments in various desperate attacks, in all of which she

displayed the most heroic courage, Joan in a few weeks compelled the earl

of Suffolk and his army to raise the siege, having sustained the loss

of six thousand men. The proposal of crowning Charles at Rheims would

formerly have appeared like madness, but the Maid of Orleans now insisted

on its fulfillment. She accordingly recommenced the campaign on the 10th

of June; to complete the deliverance of Orleans an attack was begun upon

the neighboring places, Jargeau, Meung, and Beaugency; thousands of the

late dispirited subjects of Charles now flocked to his standard, many

towns immediately declared for him; and the English, who had suffered in

various actions, at that of Jargeau, when the earl of Suffolk was taken

prisoner, and at that of Patay, when Sir John Fastolfe fled without

striking a blow, seemed now to be totally dispirited. On the 16th of

July King Charles entered Rheims, and the ceremony of his coronation was

fixed for the morrow.

It was solemn and emotional as are all old national traditions which

recur after a forced suspension. Joan rode between Dunois and the

archbishop of Rheims, chancellor of France. The air resounded with the

_Te Deum_ sung with all their hearts by clergy and crowd. “In God’s

name,” said Joan to Dunois, “here is a good people and a devout; when

I die, I should much like it to be in these parts.” “Joan,” inquired

Dunois, “know you when you will die and in what place?” “I know not,”

said she, “for I am at the will of God.” Then she added, “I have

accomplished that which my Lord commanded me, to raise the siege of

Orleans and have the gentle king crowned. I would like it well if it

should please Him to send me back to my father and mother, to keep their

sheep and their cattle and do that which was my wont.” “When the said

lords,” says the chronicler, an eye-witness, “heard these words of Joan,

who, with eyes toward heaven, gave thanks to God, they the more believed

that it was somewhat sent from God and not otherwise.”

Historians and even contemporaries have given much discussion to the

question whether Joan of Arc, according to her first ideas, had really

limited her design to the raising of the siege of Orleans and the

coronation of Charles VII. at Rheims. However that may be, when Orleans

was relieved and Charles VII. crowned, the situation, posture, and part

of Joan underwent a change. She no longer manifested the same confidence

in herself and her designs. She no longer exercised over those in whose

midst she lived the same authority. She continued to carry on war, but at

hap-hazard, sometimes with and sometimes without success, just like La

Hire and Dunois; never discouraged, never satisfied, and never looking

upon herself as triumphant. After the coronation, her advice was to march

at once upon Paris, in order to take up a fixed position in it, as being

the political center of the realm of which Rheims was the religious.

Nothing of the sort was done. She threw herself into Compiègne, then

besieged by the duke of Burgundy. The next day (May 25, 1430), heading

a sally upon the enemy, she was repulsed and compelled to retreat after

exerting the utmost valor; when, having nearly reached the gate of the

town, an English archer pursued her and pulled her from her horse. The

joy of the English at this capture was as great as if they had obtained a

complete victory. Joan was committed to the care of John of Luxembourg,

count of Ligny, from whom the duke of Bedford purchased the captive for

ten thousand pounds, and a pension of three hundred pounds a year to

the bastard of Vendôme, to whom she surrendered. Joan was now conducted

to Rouen, where, loaded with irons, she was thrown into a dungeon,

preparatory to appear before a court assembled to judge her.

The trial lasted from the 21st of February to the 30th of May, 1431.

The court held forty sittings, mostly in the chapel of the castle, some

in Joan’s very prison. On her arrival there, she had been put in an

iron cage; afterward she was kept “no longer in the cage, but in a dark

room in a tower of the castle, wearing irons upon her feet, fastened

by a chain to a large piece of wood, and guarded night and day by four

or five soldiers of low grade.” She complained of being thus chained;

but the bishop told her that her former attempts at escape demanded

this precaution. “It is true,” said Joan, as truthful as heroic, “I did

wish and I still wish to escape from prison, as is the right of every

prisoner.” At her examination, the bishop required her to take “an oath

to tell the truth about everything as to which she should be questioned.”

“I know not what you mean to question me about; perchance you may ask me

things I would not tell you; touching my revelations, for instance, you

might ask me to tell something I have sworn not to tell; thus I should

be perjured, which you ought not to desire.” The bishop insisted upon an

oath absolute and without condition. “You are too hard on me,” said Joan;

“I do not like to take an oath to tell the truth save as to matters

which concern the faith.” The bishop called upon her to swear on pain

of being held guilty of the things imputed to her. “Go on to something

else,” said she. And this was the answer she made to all questions which

seemed to her to be a violation of her right to be silent. Wearied and

hurt at these imperious demands, she one day said, “I come on God’s

business, and I have naught to do here; send me back to God from whom I

come.” “Are you sure you are in God’s grace?” asked the bishop. “If I be

not,” answered Joan, “please God to bring me to it; and if I be, please

God to keep me in it!” The bishop himself remained dumbfounded.

There is no object in following through all its sittings and all its

twistings this odious and shameful trial, in which the judges’ prejudiced

servility and scientific subtlety were employed for three months to

wear out the courage or overreach the understanding of a young girl of

nineteen, who refused at one time to lie, and at another to enter into

discussion with them, and made no defence beyond holding her tongue or

appealing to God who had spoken to her and dictated to her that which

she had done. In the end she was condemned for all the crimes of which

she had been accused, aggravated by that of heresy, and sentenced to

perpetual imprisonment, to be fed during life on bread and water. The

English were enraged that she was not condemned to death. “Wait but a

little,” said one of the judges, “we shall soon find the means to ensnare

her.” And this was effected by a grievous accusation, which, though

somewhat countenanced by the Levitical law, has been seldom urged in

modern times, the wearing of man’s attire. Joan had been charged with

this offense, but she promised not to repeat it. A suit of man’s apparel

was designedly placed in her chamber, and her own garments, as some

authors say, being removed, she clothed herself in the forbidden garb,

and her keepers surprising her in that dress, she was adjudged to death

as a relapsed heretic, and was condemned to be burnt in the marketplace

at Rouen (1431).

The Chautauquan, Vol. 04, March 1884, No. 6 · 第 11 / 158 题