GALILEO

With the history of Galileo and Copernicus, there is connected a

man of such stern and withal striking individuality that the story of

the rise and evolution of astronomy can not be told and this man's name

left out. Giordano Bruno was born in Fifteen Hundred Forty-eight. His

parents were obscure people, and his childhood and early education are

enveloped in mystery. Occasional passages in his writings refer to his

sympathy for outcast children, and he quotes the saying of Jesus,

"Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not, for of

such is the Kingdom of Heaven." He then refers to himself as having been

a waif and robbed of the love that was his due, "the lawful, legal

heritage of every child, sent without its consent into a world of

struggle and strife, where only love makes existence possible."

Evidently, the early life of Bruno was a symbol and shadow of what Fate

held in store for him.

The first authentic knowledge we have of Bruno was when he was

twenty-two years old. He was then a Dominican monk, and he is brought to

our attention because he distinguished himself by incurring the

displeasure of his superiors. His particular offense was that he had

declared, "The infallibility of the Pope is only in matters spiritual,

and does not apply to the science of material things."

Strangely enough, these words of Bruno are almost identical with words

recently expressed by Cardinal Satolli.

The difference in their reception is owing to a mere matter of a few

hundred years. Truth is a question of time and place. Bruno was banished

for his temerity, and Satolli wears the red hat. Verily, yesterday's

heresy is today's orthodoxy.

* * * * *

The attitude of the Church toward the teachings of Copernicus, after the

death of the man, was one of patronizing pity.

Instead of putting his great book, "Revolutions of the Heavenly Bodies,"

on the "Index," the wiser plan was adopted of paying no attention to it.

Occasionally, however, the subject was broached by some incautious

novitiate, and then the custom was to treat the Copernican Theory as a

mere hypothesis, and its author as a mental defective.

Bruno would not have it so. To him it was a very important matter

whether the sun revolved around the earth as the priests taught, or the

earth revolved around the sun as set forth in the work of Copernicus. He

came to the conclusion that Copernicus was right, and said so.

It was ordered that he should cease lecturing on the subject of

astronomy and apply himself to spiritual matters. He argued that he

should be allowed to think and speak what he pleased about the stars,

since the whole matter was one of opinion, and even the Pope did not

know, positively, the final facts of astronomy, and if the Copernican

Theory was a hypothesis, so also was the Ptolemaic Theory held by the

Church.

It will be seen that Copernicus and Bruno were very different in

temperament: one was gentle, diplomatic, cautious; the other was

headstrong, firm and full of argument.

Bruno was given his choice: to cease the study of astronomy or to lay

aside the Dominican frock. The hardihood of the young man was seen in

that he unfrocked himself, thinking that once outside of the order he

was not responsible to a superior and could teach what he pleased, so

long as it was not "heresy."

Heresy is treason to the Church, but Bruno could not see how spiritual

dogma could cover the facts of Physical Science, since new facts were

constantly being discovered, and the material universe could only be

understood by being studied. He was too innocent to comprehend that a

vast majority of the people believed that popes, cardinals and priests

knew everything, and that when any branch of knowledge was questioned it

placed the priests in doubt. Certainly the Church has not opposed

Science--she has only opposed heresy. But the curious fact is that

advancing Science has usually been to the Church heretical. When Bruno

opposed anything that the priests taught, he opposed the Church. He was

warned to leave Rome--his life was in danger. He fled to Geneva, the

home of Calvin.

Here he thought, surely, he could speak and write as he chose. But alas!

Protestantism cared even less about Science than did the monks, and

"heresy" to John Calvin was quite as serious a matter as it was to

Calvin's competitor, the Pope of Rome.

The Protestants of Geneva gave Bruno scant attention; they had never

heard of Copernicus, and the movements of the stars were as nothing to

them, since the world was soon to come to an end.

The learned men were even then making mathematical calculations, based

on the prophecies of the Old Testament, as to how soon the general

destruction would take place.

Bruno sought to argue them out of their childishness, with the result

that he got himself marked as an infidel and a dangerous man.

From Geneva he went to Lyons, then to Paris, where his personality made

itself felt, and he was given a hearing at the University. Here he

remained for several years, when he went to England, arriving there in

Fifteen Hundred Eighty-four, the same year that a rustic by the name of

William Shakespeare, from Stratford, reached London. Whether they ever

met is doubtful.

Bruno spoke five languages, and his polite accomplishments afforded him

an immediate entry into the best circles of society. He was entertained

at the home of Sir Philip Sidney, and afterward carried on an extensive

correspondence with this prince of gentlemen. Greville presented Bruno

to Queen Elizabeth, who invited him to lecture at the Court on his

favorite theme.

This he did, and it is quite probable that the noble lords and ladies

left "calls" so they could be awakened when the lecture was over and

congratulate the speaker of the evening on his effort.

At Oxford there were disputations where Bruno's faultless Latin

impressed the pedants much more than did his argument, so they offered

him a position as Professor of Languages, but this he smilingly

declined, excusing himself on the grounds that he had important business

on the Continent: and he had. Already they were collecting fagots for

his benefit.

He returned to Paris and began his lecturing on Science. His arguments

had convinced one person at least, and that was himself, that as the

Church knew nothing of Physical Science, why, possibly it stood in a

like position regarding spiritual truth. That is to say, the so-called

"sacred truths" were mere assumptions piled up to satisfy the people,

and the ignorance and superstition of the many marked high water for the

teaching of the priests. The business of the Church was to satisfy the

people, and not enlighten them, for if the people became enlightened

enough they would see that they did not need the Church, and then where

were the honors and the riches and the red hats!

Bruno cleared his mind of its cobwebs by expression, just as we all

do--that is what expression is for.

The people really dictate to the priests what they shall teach;

moreover, the people absolutely refuse to listen to anything in which

they do not believe, and decline to pay for preaching that is not done

to their own dictation. The business, then, of the Church is to study

carefully the ignorance of the people and conform to it. On this one

thing does its stability depend. Therefore it must, as a matter of

self-preservation, suppress any chance intellect that is ahead of its

time, lest this man honeycomb the whole structure of churchly dogma.

Bruno said that, just as the world seemed to stand still and the stars

move around us, so did the Church seem to most people a fixed fact. But

exactly the opposite was true; the Church moves as the people move, and

unless men outside of the Church educate the people, or the people

educate themselves, they will forever remain in darkness.

Bruno offered to debate the question publicly with the Bishop of Paris.

That worthy was no match for Bruno in point of oratory, but when we can

not answer a man's reasons, all is not lost, for we can at least call

him vile names, and this is often quite as effectual as logic.

The Bishop launched a fusillade of theological lyddite at Bruno,

declaring that any Churchman who would so much as hold converse with

such a wretch was disgraced forever, and that the propositions Bruno

wished to argue were unthinkable to a self-respecting man. He declared

that it was only the mercy of God that kept the lightning from striking

Bruno dead as he wrote his heresies.

Matters were getting strained, and the authorities, fearing

insurrection, acted upon the advice of the good Bishop and expelled

Bruno from France. He went to Wittenberg, in his innocence, intending to

tack on the church-door there his theses. But Wittenberg had no use for

Bruno--he believed too much, or too little, Luther could not tell which.

The University of Zurich now offered to let the exile come there and

teach what he wished. Thither he journeyed and there his restless mind

seemed for the first time to find a home. His writings were slowly

making head, and around him there clustered a goodly group of students

who believed in him and loved him.

In the midst of this oasis in a troubled life, word came from some of

the old-time friends he had known in Rome. They were now in Venice, and

wished to have him come there and lecture. Bruno thought that his little

leaven was leavening the whole lump--he was not without ambition--he was

flattered by the invitation. He accepted it and went to Venice.

It was simply a ruse to get the man within striking distance. Very soon

after his arrival in Venice he was arrested by agents of the Inquisition

and secretly taken to Rome. He was lodged in a dungeon of the Castle

Saint Angelo. Just what his experience was there we can not say--the

horrors of it all are not ours, for no friend of Bruno's was allowed to

approach, and what he there wrote was destroyed.

We do know, however, that he was asked to recant, and we know he

refused. We also know that he repeated his heresies and hurled back

into the teeth of his accusers the invective they heaped upon him.

Bribery, persuasion, threat and torture were tried in turn, but all in

vain, for Bruno would not swerve. Unlike Savonarola his quivering flesh

could not wring from his heart an apology.

He scorned the rack and thumbscrew, declaring they could not reach his

soul. He knew that death would be the end; he prayed for it, and even

thought to hasten it by an aggravating manner and harshness of speech

toward his captors, seemingly quite unnecessary.

For seven long years he was in prison. He was burned alive on the

Seventh of February, Sixteen Hundred, aged fifty-two.

When bound to the stake he turned his face from the crucifix that was

held before him, and sought to kiss the fagots. His ashes were thrown to

the four winds. Thus perished Bruno.

* * * * *

In the year Fifteen Hundred Sixty-four, Galileo Galilei was born;

consequently, he was thirty-six years old when Bruno was executed. He

had known Bruno, had attended many of his lectures, and had followed his

career with interest; and while he agreed with him concerning the

Copernican theory of the earth's revolution, he took exceptions to

Bruno's arbitrary ways of presenting the matter, and also to his

scathing criticisms of theology. At this time Galileo could not see that

the extravagant words of Bruno were largely forced from him by the

violence of the opposition he had encountered. Galileo fully believed

that Bruno had been put to death for treason to the Church, and not on

account of his astronomical teachings.

These men had come up from totally different stations in life. Bruno was

a man of the people--a self-made man--who bore upon his person the marks

of the hammer. Galileo was of noble blood, and traced an ancestry to a

Gonfalonier of Florence. From early infancy he had enjoyed association

with polite persons, and had sat on the knees of greatness.

When eighteen he was graduated from the University of Pisa; and at that

early age his family and friends were comparing him, not without reason,

to a Genius who had come out of Tuscany some years before, Leonardo da

Vinci.

Parents either exaggerate the talents of their children or else

belittle them. The woman who bore George Gordon called him "that lame

brat"; but we call him "The Poet Byron."

Benjamin Franklin ran away from home, and his family thought themselves

disgraced by his printed utterances. George Washington's mother, after

being told that her son had been made Commander-in-Chief, laughed

knowingly and said, "They don't know him as well as I do!" Voltaire's

father posted his son as irresponsible, tied up a legacy so "the

scapegrace could not waste it," invested good money in daily prayers to

be said for the scapegrace's salvation, and then died of a broken heart,

just as play-actors do on the stage, only this man died sure enough.

Alfred Tennyson at thirteen wrote a poem addressed to his grandfather;

the old gentleman gave him a guinea for it, and then wrote these words:

"This is the first and last penny you will ever receive for writing

poetry." The father of Shelley misquoted Job, and said, "Oh, to be

brought down to the grave in grief through the follies of an ungrateful

child!" And Labouchere says that one of the four brothers of Shakespeare

used to explain that he wasn't the play-actor who wrote "Hamlet" and

"Othello," lest, mayhap, his name should be smirched.

Galileo's mother had that beautiful dream which I believe all good

mothers have: that her son might be the savior of the world. As he grew

to manhood, her faith in him did not relax.

In childhood Galileo showed great skill in invention. He made curious

toys with cogs and wheels and eccentrics; whittled out violins, and

transformed simple reeds into lutes, upon which he played music of his

own composition. In fact, so great was his skill in music that at twenty

they wished to make him official organist and choirmaster of the

Cathedral. His personal taste, however, ran more to painting; for some

months he worked at his canvases with an ardor too great to last long.

If ever a man was touched by the Spirit of the Renaissance, it was

surely young Galileo. The Archbishop of Pisa said, "Upon him has fallen

the mantle of Michelangelo."

He gave lectures on Art, and taught Painting by actual example. One of

his pupils, and a great artist, Lodovico Cigoli, always maintained that

it was to the inspiration and counsel of Galileo that he owed his

success.

There are really only two things to see at Pisa: one is the Leaning

Tower, from which Galileo with his line and plummet made some of his

most interesting experiments; and the other is the Cathedral where the

visitor beholds the great bronze lamp that is suspended from the vaulted

ceiling. When he was about twenty-one, sitting in the silence of this

church (which the passing years have only made more beautiful), he

noticed that there was a slight swinging motion to this lamp--it was

never still. Galileo set to work timing and measuring these

oscillations, and he found that they were always done in exact measure

and in perfect rhythm. This led, some years later, to perfecting an

astronomical clock for measuring movements of the stars. And from this

was originated the pendulum-clock, where before we had depended on

sundials.

The endeavor of Galileo's parents had been to keep him ignorant of

mathematics and practical life, that he might blossom forth as a saint

who would sing and play and make pictures like those of Leonardo, and

carve statues like Michelangelo, only better.

But parents plan, and Fate disposes.

In Fifteen Hundred Eighty-three, Ostilio Ricci, the famous

mathematician, chanced to be in Pisa, on his way from Rome to Milan, and

gave a lecture at the Court, on Geometry.

Galileo was not interested in the theme, but he was in the speaker, and

so he attended the lecture.

This action proved one of the pivotal points in his life.

"Whether other people really teach us anything, is a question," says

Stanley Hall; "but they do sometimes give us impulses, and make us find

out for ourselves."

Ricci made Galileo find out for himself.

He turned to Archimedes from Plato. Geometry became a passion, and a

very wise man has told us that we never accomplish anything, either good

or bad, without passion. Passion means one hundred pounds of steam on

the boiler, with love sitting on the safety-valve, when the blow-off is

set for fifty.

It surely is risky business, I will admit; accidents will occur

occasionally and explosions sometimes happen, but everything is risky,

even life, since few get out of it alive.

And so, to drop back to the original proposition, nothing great and

sublime is ever done without passion.

Galileo had his mechanical whooping-cough, musical mumps, artistic

measles, and now the hectic flush of mathematics burned on his cheeks.

He talked and dreamed mathematics.

Euclid was in the saddle.

Ricci became interested in the talented young scholar and remained

longer at Pisa than he had intended, that they might sit up all night

and surprise the rising sun, discussing beauties of dimensions and the

wonders of dynamics.

Together they went to Florence, where Ricci introduced his pupil as a

pedagogic sample of the goods, just as Booker Washington usually takes

with him on his travels a few ebony homo bricks as his specimens from

Tuskegee.

The beauty and the grace of Galileo's speech and presence put the

abstract Ricci in the shadow. The right man can make anything

interesting, just as Dean Swift could write an entrancing essay with the

broomstick as a central theme. The man's the thing, Hamlet to the

contrary, notwithstanding.

Galileo knew the Florentine heart, and so he gave lectures on a

Florentine: one Dante, who loved a girl named Beatrice.

The young Pisan drew diagrams of Dante's Inferno--and surely it was

nobody's else. He gave its size, height, weight, and told how to reach

it.

He gave lectures on the Hydrostatic Balance and the Centers of Gravity,

and then published them as serials.

The Florentines crowned him with bay and enthusiastically proclaimed

him, "The Modern Archimedes."

* * * * *

Pisa now put forth efforts to have her gifted son come home. There was

always rivalry between Pisa and Florence. Pisa could not afford to

supply Florence her men of genius--let her depend upon production from

home, or go without.

Galileo became Professor of Mathematics at the University of Pisa, a

life position, or at least one he could hold during good behavior.

One of the time-honored dictums of the day was that falling bodies fell

with a velocity proportioned to their weight. The question was first

thrashed out in the classroom; and after Galileo had slyly gotten all of

these scientific wiseacres to commit themselves, he invited them, with

their students, to the Leaning Tower.

Then he proved by ocular demonstrations that they were positively wrong.

It is very beautiful to teach Truth, but error should not be corrected

with too much eclat. If the love of Truth, alone, was the guiding

impulse of Galileo, he might have secretly explained his theory to one

of the wiseacres, and this wiseacre could have casually demonstrated it,

so all the rest could have said, "That is what we always knew and

taught."

Instead of this, Galileo compelled the entire faculty to back water and

dine on fricasseed crow.

They got even by calling him "a scientific bastardino," and at his next

lecture he was roundly hissed. Soon after he was bluntly informed that

his office was to teach the young, and not to undo the old.

And that is the way the troubles of Galileo began.

He might then have apologized, and slipped back into peace and obscurity

and later been tucked in by kind oblivion. But he had tasted blood, and

the rabies of setting straight the scientific world, for its own good,

was upon him.

That he was wrong in the correction of his elders, he would not for a

moment admit; and he was even guilty of saying, "Antiquity can not

sanctify that which is wrong in reason and false in principle." Soon

after he committed another forepaugh by showing that a wonderful boat

invented by Giovanni de Medici for the purpose of fighting hostile

ships, would not work, since there were no men on board to guide it, and

its automatic steering apparatus would as likely run its nose into land,

as into the hull of the enemy.

He also decorated his argument with a few subtle touches as to the

beauty of fighting battles without going to war and risking life and

limb.

Men who are not kind to the faults of royalty can hope for small favor

in a monarchy, though the monarchy be a republic. Galileo was cut off

the Standard Oil payroll, and forced to apply to a teachers' agency,

that he might find employment.

He did not wait long; the rival University of Padua tendered him a

position on a silver platter; and the Paduans made much dole about how

unfortunate it was that men could not teach Truth in Italy, save at

Padua--alas! The Governing Board of Padua made a great stroke in

securing Galileo, and Pisa fell back on her Leaning Tower as her chief

attraction.

From a position of mediocrity, the University of Padua gradually rose to

one of worldwide celebrity. Galileo remained at Padua from Fifteen

Hundred Ninety-two to Sixteen Hundred Ten, which years are famous not

alone through the wonderful inventions of Galileo, but because in that

same interval of time, at least thirty of Shakespeare's thirty-seven

plays were written. Surely, God was smiling on the planet Earth!

Galileo's salary was raised every year, starting at two hundred florins,

until it reached over one thousand florins, not to mention the numerous

gifts from grateful pupils, old and young. Students came to Padua from

all over the world to hear Galileo's lectures.

Starting with only a common classroom, the audience increased so fast

that a special auditorium was required that would seat two thousand

persons. It was during this time that Galileo invented the proportional

compasses, an instrument now in use everywhere, without the slightest

change having been made in it.

He also invented the thermometer; but greatest, best and most wonderful

of all, he produced an instrument through which he could view the stars,

and see them much magnified. With this instrument, he saw heavenly

bodies that had never been seen before; he beheld that Jupiter had

satellites which moved in orbits, and that Venus revolved, showing

different sides at different times, thus proving that which Copernicus

declared was true, but which, for lack of apparatus, he could not prove.

Galileo Galilei was getting to be more than a professor of

mathematics--he was becoming a power in the world.

The lever of his mighty mind was indeed finding a fulcrum.

* * * * *

The year Sixteen Hundred Nine is forever fixed in history, through the

fact that in that year Galileo invented the telescope.

Every good thing is an evolution. "Specilla," or helps to read, had been

made, and sold privately and mysteriously, as early as the year Fourteen

Hundred. These first magnifying-glasses were associated with magic, or

wonder-working; the words "magnify" and "magic" having a common source

and a similar meaning. Magicians wore big square glasses, and by their

aid, some of them claimed to see things at a great distance; and also to

perceive things stolen, hidden or lost. Occasionally, the magician would

persuade his customer to try on the glasses, and then even common men

could see for themselves that there was something in the

scheme--goodness me! The use of spectacles was at first confined

entirely to these wonder-workers--or men who magnified things forever.

During the Fifteenth Century, public readers and occasionally priests

wore spectacles. To read was a miracle to most people, and a book was a

mysterious and sacred thing--or else a diabolical thing. The populace

would watch the man put on his "specillum," and the idea was everywhere

abroad that the magic glasses gave an ability to read; and that anybody

who was inspired by angels, or devils, who could get hold of spectacles,

could at once read from a book.

We hear of one magician who, about the year Fifteen Hundred, made a box

with a glass cover that magnified the contents. This great man would

catch a flea and show it to the people. Then he would place the flea in

the box and show it to them, and they would see that it had grown

enormously in an instant. The man could make it big or little, by just

taking off and putting on the cover of the box!

This individual worked wonders for a consideration, but Fate overtook

him and he was smothered under a feather bed for having too much wizard

in his cosmos. A wizard, be it known, is a male witch, and the Bible

says, "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live," although it does not say

anything about wizards.

But please note this: the wizard who had that magic box and flea had

really the first microscope.

Galileo bought a pair of "magic glasses," or spectacles, about the year

Sixteen Hundred Seven; and his action, in so doing, was freely

criticized.

On a visit to Venice, where glass had been manufactured since long

before the Flood, Galileo was looking through one of the

glass-factories, just as visitors do now, and one of the workmen showed

him a peculiar piece of glass which magnified the hairs on the back of

his hand many times.

In a very few days after this, Galileo heard that a Dutch

spectacle-maker had placed certain queer-shaped pieces of glass in a

tube, and offered to sell this tube to the Government, so by its use,

soldiers could see the movements of an enemy many miles away.

That night Galileo did not close his eyes in sleep. He thought out a

plan by which he could place pieces of glass in a tube, and bring the

stars close to the earth. By daylight the whole plan was clear in his

mind, and he hastened to the shop of the glassmakers.

There, two lenses were made, one plano-convex, and the other

plano-concave, and these were placed in a tube made of sheet copper. It

was tested on distant objects; and behold! they were magnified by three.

Would this tube show the stars magnified? Galileo knew of no reason why

it should not, but he paced his room in hot impatience, waiting for the

night to come with its twinkling wonders, that he might verify his

convictions. When the first yellow star appeared in the West, Galileo

turned his tube upon it, and behold! instead of twinkling points of

light, he saw a round mass--a world--moving through space, and not a

scintillating object with five points. The twinkling spikes, or points,

were merely an optical illusion of the unaided senses.

Galileo made no secret of his invention. It was called "Galileo's Tube,"

but some of the priests called it Galileo's "Magic Tube."

Yet it marked an era in the scientific world. Galileo endeavored

constantly to improve his instrument; and from a threefold magnifying

power, he finally made one that magnified thirty-two times.

Galileo made hundreds of telescopes, and sold them at moderate prices to

any one who would buy. He explained minutely the construction of the

instrument, showing clearly how it was made in accordance with the

natural laws of optics. His desire was to dissipate the superstition

that there was something diabolical or supernatural about the "Magic

Tube"--that, in fact, it was not magic, and the operator had no peculiar

powers; you had simply to comply with the laws of Nature, and any one

could see for himself.

It is hard for us, at this day, to understand the opposition that sprang

up against the telescope. We must remember that at this time belief in

witchcraft, fairies, sprites, ghosts, hobgoblins, magic and supernatural

powers was common. Men who believe in miracles make rather poor

scientists.

There were books about "Magic," written by so-called scientific men,

whose standing in the world was quite as high as that of Galileo.

In Sixteen Hundred Ten, Galileo published his book entitled, "Sidera

Medicea," wherein he described the wonders that could be seen in the

heavens by the aid of the telescope. Among other things, he said the

Milky Way was not a great streak of light, but was composed of a

multitude of stars; and he made a map of the stars that could be seen

only with the aid of the telescope.

There resided in Venice at this time a scientific man by the name of

Porta, who was much more popular than Galileo. He was a priest, whose

piety and learning was unimpeached.

The year after Galileo issued his book, Porta put out a work much more

pretentious, called "Natural Magic." In this book Porta does not claim

that magicians all have supernatural powers; but he goes on to prove how

they deceive the world by the use of their peculiar apparatus, and

intimates that they sometimes sell their souls to the Devil, and then

are positively dangerous. He dives deep into science, history and his

own imagination to prove things.

The man was no fool--he constructed a kaleidoscope that showed an

absolute, geometrical symmetry, where in fact there was only confusion.

He showed how, by the use of mirrors, things could be made big, small,

tall, short, wide, crooked or distorted. He told of how magicians, by

the use of Galileo's Tube, could show seven stars where there was only

one; and he even made such a tube of his own and called the priests

together to look through it. He painted stars on the glass, and had men

look at the heavens. He even stuck a louse on the lens and located the

beast in the heavens, for the benefit of a doubting Cardinal. It was all

a joke, but at the time no sober, sincere man of Science could argue him

down. He owned "bum" telescopes that proved all kinds of things, to the

great amusement of the enemies of Galileo. The intent of Porta was to

expose the frauds and fallacies of Galileo. Porta also claimed that he

had seen telescopes by which you could look over a hill and around a

corner, but he did not recommend them, since by their use things are

often perceived that were not there. And so we see why the priests

positively refused to look through Galileo's Tube, or to believe

anything he said. Porta, and a few others like him, showed a deal more

than Galileo could and offered to locate stars anywhere on order.

Galileo had much offended these priests by his statements that the Bible

did not contain the final facts of Science, and now they were getting

even with a vengeance. It was all very much like the theological guffaw

that swept over Christendom when Darwin issued his "Origin of Species,"

and Talmage and Spurgeon set their congregations in a roar by gently

sarcastic references to monkey ancestry.

* * * * *

Amid the general popping of theological small-arms, Galileo moved

steadily forward. If he had many enemies he surely had a few friends. As

he once had proved more than Pisa could digest, so now he was bringing

to the surface of things more truth than Padua could assimilate.

Venice too was getting uncomfortable. Even the Doge said, in reply to an

enthusiastic admirer of Galileo, "Your master is not famous: he is

merely notorious."

It was discovered that Galileo had been living with a woman by the name

of Marina Gamba, at Venice, even while he held the professorship at

Padua, and that they had a son, Vincenzo Gamba, and two daughters. One

of the enemy drew a map of the heavens, showing Galileo as the sun,

Marina Gamba as the moon, and around them circulated numerous little

satellites, which were supposed to be their children. The picture had so

great a vogue that the Doge issued an order that all copies of it be

destroyed.

Of Marina Gamba we know very little; but the fact that she made entries

in Galileo's journal and kept his accounts proves that she was a person

of considerable intelligence; and this, too, was at a time when

semi-oriental ideas prevailed and education was supposedly beyond the

feminine grasp.

Galileo did not marry, for the reason that he was practically a priest,

a teacher in a religious school, living with and looking after the

pupils; and the custom then was that whoever was engaged in such an

occupation should not wed.

The stormy opposition to Galileo was not without its advantages. We are

advertised no less by our rabid enemies than by our loving friends.

Cosimo the Second, Grand Duke of Tuscany, had intimated that Florence

would give the great astronomer a welcome. Galileo moved to Florence

under the protection of Cosimo, intending to devote all his time to

Science.

In giving up schoolteaching and popular lecturing, Galileo really made a

virtue of necessity. No orthodox lyceum course would tolerate him; he

was neither an impersonator nor an entertainer; the stereopticon and the

melodramatic were out of his line, and his passion for truth made him

impossible to the many.

He was treading the path of Bruno: the accusations, the taunts and

jeers, the denials and denunciations, were urging him on to an unseemly

earnestness.

Father Clavius said that Galileo never saw the satellites of Jupiter

until he had made an instrument that would create them; and if God had

intended that men should see strange things in the heavens, He would

have supplied them sufficient eyesight. The telescope was really a

devil's instrument.

Still another man declared that if the earth moved, acorns falling from

a high tree would all fall behind the tree and not directly under it.

Father Brini said that if the earth revolved, we would all fall off of

it into the air when it was upside down; moreover, its whirling through

space would create a wind that would sweep it bald.

Father Caccini preached a sermon from the text, "Ye men of Galilee, why

stand ye gazing up into heaven?" Only he changed the word "Galilee" to

"Galileo," claiming it was the same thing, only different, and as reward

for his wit he was made a bishop.

Cardinal Bellarmine, a man of great energy, earnest, zealous, sincere,

learned--the Doctor Buckley of his day--showed how that: "if the

Copernican Theory should prevail, it would be the absolute undoing of

the Bible, and the destruction of the Church, rendering the death of

Christ futile. If the earth is only one of many planets, and not the

center of the universe, and the other planets are inhabited, the whole

plan of salvation fails, since the inhabitants of the other spheres are

without the Bible, and Christ did not die for them." This was the

argument of Father Lecazre, and many others who took their cue from him.

Galileo was denounced as "atheist" and "infidel"--epithets that do not

frighten us much now, since they have been applied to most of the really

great and good men who have ever lived. But then such words set fire to

masses of inflammable prejudices, and there were conflagrations of wrath

and hate against which it was vain to argue.

The Archbishop of Pisa especially felt it incumbent upon him "to bring

Galileo to justice."

Galileo was born at Pisa, educated there, taught in the University; and

now he had disgraced the place and brought it into disrepute.

Galileo was still in communication with teachers at Pisa, and the

Archbishop made it his business to have letters written to Galileo

asking certain specific questions. One man, Castelli, declined to be

used for the purpose of entrapping Galileo, but others there were who

loaned themselves to the plan.

In Sixteen Hundred Sixteen, Galileo received a formal summons from Pope

Paul the Fifth to come to Rome and purge himself of heresies that he had

expressed in letters which were then in the hands of the Inquisition.

Galileo appealed to his friends at Florence, but they were powerless.

When the Pope issued an order, it could not be waived. The greatest

thinker of his time journeyed to Rome and faced the greatest theologian

of his day, Cardinal Bellarmine.

The Cardinal firmly and clearly showed Galileo the error of his way.

Galileo offered to prove for the Cardinal by astronomical observations

that the Copernican Theory was true. Cardinal Bellarmine said that there

was only one truth and that was spiritual truth. That the Bible was

true, or it was not. If not, then was religion a fallacy and our hope of

Heaven a delusion.

Galileo contended that the death of Christ had nothing to do with the

truth, so Science and these things should not be shuffled and confused.

This attitude of mind greatly shocked the Inquisitors, and they made

haste to inform the Pope, who at once issued an order that the

astronomer should be placed in a dungeon until he saw fit to disavow

that the sun was the center of the universe, and the earth moves.

A sort of compromise, it seems, was here effected by Galileo's promise

not to further teach that the earth revolves.

He was kept at Rome under strict surveillance for some months, but was

finally allowed to return to Florence, and cautioned that he must cease

all public teaching, speaking and writing on the subject of astronomy.

On March Fifth, Sixteen Hundred Sixteen, the consulting theologians of

the Holy Office reiterated that the propositions of Galileo, that the

sun is the center of the universe, and that the earth has a rotary

motion, were "absurd in philosophy, heretical, and also contrary to

Scripture."

The works of Copernicus were then placed upon the "Index," and Pope Paul

issued a special decree, warning all Churchmen to "abjure, shun and

forever abstain from giving encouragement, support, succor or friendship

to any one who believed or taught that the earth revolves."

The name of Copernicus was not removed from the "Index" until the year

Eighteen Hundred Eighteen.

* * * * *

Galileo made his way back to Florence, defeated and disappointed. He had

not been tortured, except mentally, but he had heard the dungeon-key

turned in the big lock and felt the humiliation of being made a captive.

The instruments of torture had been shown to him, and he had heard the

cries of the condemned.

The cell that Bruno had occupied was his, and he was also taken to the

spot where Bruno was burned: the place was there, but where was Bruno!

He realized how utterly impossible it was to teach truth to those who

did not desire truth, and the vanity of replying to men for whom a pun

answered the purposes of fact.

As he could neither teach nor lecture at Florence, his services to the

Court were valueless. He was a disgraced and silenced man.

He retired to a village a few miles from the city, and in secret

continued his studies and observations. The Grand Duke supplied him a

small pension and suggested that it would be increased if Galileo would

give lectures on Poetry and Rhetoric, which were not forbidden themes,

and try to make himself either commonplace or amusing.

We can imagine the reply--Galileo had but one theme, the wonders of the

heavens above.

* * * * *

So the years went by, and Galileo, sixty-seven years old, was

impoverished and forgotten, yet in his proud heart burned the embers of

ambition. He believed in himself; he believed in the sacredness of his

one mission. Pope Paul had gone on his long journey, for even infallible

popes die. Cardinal Barberini had become Pope Urban the Eighth. Years

before, Galileo and Barberini had taught together at Padua, and when

Galileo was silenced, a long letter of sympathy had come from his old

colleague, and occasionally since they had exchanged friendly letters.

Galileo thought that Urban was his friend, and he knew that Urban, in

his heart, believed in the theory of Copernicus.

Galileo then emerged from his seclusion and began teaching and speaking

in Florence. He also fitted up an observatory and invited the scholars

to make use of his telescope.

Father Melchior hereupon put forth a general denunciation, aimed

especially at Galileo, without mentioning his name, to this effect: "The

opinion of the earth's motion is, of all heresies, the most abominable,

the most pernicious, the most scandalous: the immovability of the earth

is thrice sacred.

"An argument against the existence of God and the immortality of the

soul would be sooner tolerated than the idea that the earth moves."

In reply to this fusillade, in Sixteen Hundred Thirty-two Galileo put

forth his book entitled, "The Dialogue," which was intended to place the

ideas of Copernicus in popular form.

Galileo had endeavored to communicate with Urban, but the Pope had

chosen to ignore him--to consider him as one dead. Galileo misconstrued

the silence, thinking it meant that he could do and say what he wished

and that there would be no interference.

A copy of Galileo's book reaching the Pope, his silence was at once

broken. The book was condemned and all copies found were ordered to be

burned by the hangman in the public streets. But the book had met with a

wide sale and many copies had been carried to Germany, England and

France, and in these countries the work was reprinted and sent back to

Italy.

Urban ordered Galileo to present himself at Rome forthwith. A score of

years had passed since Galileo's former visit--he had not forgotten it.

He wrote to the Pope and apologized for having broken the silence

imposed upon him by Pope Paul; he offered to go into retirement again;

stated that he was old, infirm, without funds, and excused himself from

obeying the order to go to Rome.

But excuses and apologies were unavailing.

A preventory order was issued and sent to the Papal Nuncio at Florence.

This was equivalent to an arrest. Galileo must go to Rome and answer for

having broken the promises he had made to the Inquisition. If he would

not go willingly, he should go in chains.

Arriving at Rome, he had several audiences with the Pope, who said

nothing would answer but a specific recantation.

What Barberini had once believed was one thing, and what the Pope must

do was another. Galileo should recant in order to keep the people from

thinking Pope Urban would allow what his predecessors would not.

The matter had become a public scandal.

Galileo tried to argue the question and asked for time to consider it.

An order was issued that he should be imprisoned. It was done.

Galileo asked for pens and paper that he might prepare his defense.

These were refused, and an order of torture was issued. It was not a

trial, defense was useless. Again he was asked to recant--the matter was

all written out--he had but to sign his name. He refused. He was brought

to the torture-chamber.

Legend and fact separate here.

There are denials from Churchmen that Galileo was so much as imprisoned.

One writer has even tried to show that Galileo was a guest of the Pope

and dined daily at his table. The other side has told us that Galileo

was thrust into a dungeon, his eyes put out, and his old broken-down

form tortured on the wheel.

Recent careful researches reveal that neither side told the truth. We

have official record of the case written out at the time for the

Vatican archives. Galileo was imprisoned and the order of torture

issued, but it was never enforced. Perhaps it was not the intention to

enforce it: it may have been only a "war measure."

Galileo was alternately taken from dungeon to palace that he might

realize which course was best for him to pursue--oppose the Church or

uphold it.

Thus we see that there was some truth in the statement that "he dined

daily with the Pope."

That the man was subjected to much indignity, all the world now knows.

The official records are in the Vatican, and the attempt to conceal them

longer is out of the question. Wise Churchmen no longer deny the

blunders of the past, but they say with Cardinal Satolli, "The enemies

of the Church have ever been o'er-zealous Churchmen."

On bended knees, Galileo, a man of threescore and ten, broken in health,

with spirit crushed, repeated after a priest these words: "I, Galileo

Galilei, being in my seventieth year, a prisoner, on my knees before

your Eminences, the Cardinals of the Holy See, having before mine eyes

the Holy Bible, which I touch with my hands and kiss with my lips, do

abjure, curse and detest the error and heresy of the movement of the

earth."

He also was made to sign the recantation. On arising from his knees,

legend declares that he said, "Yet the earth does move!"

It is hardly probable that the words reached his lips, although they may

have been in his mind. But we must remember the man's heart was broken,

and he was in a mental condition where nothing really mattered. To

complete his dishonor, all of his writings were placed on the "Index,"

and he was made to swear that he would inform the Inquisition of any man

whom he should hear or discover supporting the heresy of the motion of

the earth. The old man was then released, a prisoner on parole, and

allowed to make his way home to Florence, which he did by easy stages,

helped along the way by friendly monks who discussed with him all

questions but those of astronomy.

Galileo's eldest daughter, a nun, whose home was near his, was so

affected by the humiliation of her father that she fell into a nervous

decline and died very soon after he reached home.

Between these two there had been a close bond of love and tender

sympathy, and her death seemed almost the crowning calamity.

But once back in his village home at Arcetri, Galileo again went to work

with his telescope, mapping the heavens.

A goodly degree of health and animation came back to him, but his

eyesight, so long misused, now failed him and he became blind. Thus John

Milton found him in Sixteen Hundred Thirty-eight.

Castelli, his lifelong friend, wrote to another, "The noblest eye that

God ever made is darkened: the eye so privileged that it may in truth be

said to have seen more wonderful things and made others to see more

wonderful things, than were ever seen before." But blindness could not

subdue him any more than it could John Milton. He had others look

through the telescope and tell him what they saw and then he would

foretell what they would see next.

The policy of the Pope was that Galileo should not be disturbed so long

as he kept to his village home and taught merely the few scholars or

"servants," as they called themselves, who often came to him; but these

were to be taught mathematics, not astronomy. That he was even at the

last under suspicion is shown that concealed in the mattress of the bed

upon which he died were records of his latest discoveries concerning the

revolution of the planets. Legal opposition was made as to his right to

make a will, the claim being that he was a prisoner of the Inquisition

at his death. For the same reason his body was not allowed to be buried

in consecrated ground. The Pope overruled the objection and he was

buried in an obscure corner of the little cemetery of Saint Croce, the

grave unmarked.

So the last few years of Galileo's life were years of comparative peace

and quiet. He needed but little, and this little his few faithful,

loving friends supplied. His death came painlessly, and his last moments

were sustained by the faith that he would soon be free from the

trammels of the flesh--free to visit some of the worlds that his

telescope had brought so near to him.

Galileo was born the day that Michelangelo died; the year of his death

was the year that Sir Isaac Newton, the discoverer of the law of

gravitation, was born.

[Illustration: COPERNICUS]

Little Journeys to the Homes of the Great - Volume 12 Little Journeys to the Homes of Great Scientists · 第 19 / 42 题