In the meantime additional chairs in university subjects continued to

be founded. Another chair in arts was established in 1586, and further

chairs in law and grammar were added at the beginning of the sixteenth

century. The Spanish Crown was very much interested in Mexican

education, and King Philip II of Spain, who is usually mentioned in

English history for quite {327} other qualities than his interest in

culture and education, was especially liberal in his provision from

the Crown revenues of funds for the university. At the beginning of

the seventeenth century, according to Flores in his "History of

Medicine in Mexico from the Indian Times Down to the Present," the

total amount of income from the Crown allowed the University of Mexico

was nearly $10,000. This was about Shakespeare's time, and so we have

readily available calculations as to the buying power of money at that

time compared to our own. It is usually said that the money of

Elizabeth's time had eight to ten times the trading value of ours.

This would mean that the University of Mexico had nearly an income of

$100,000 apart from fees and other sources of revenue. This would not

be considered contemptible even in our own day for a university having

less than twenty professorships.

The number of students at the University of Mexico is not absolutely

known, but, as we have seen, Professor Bourne calculates that the

University of Lima had at the beginning of the eighteenth century more

than 2,000 students. The University of Mexico at the same time

probably had more than 1,000 students, and both of these universities

were larger in number than any institution of learning within the

boundaries of the present United States until after the middle of the

nineteenth century. After all, we began to have universities in the

real sense of {328} that word--that is, educational institutions

giving opportunities in undergraduate work and the graduate

departments of law, medicine and theology--not until nearly the end of

the first quarter of the nineteenth century. Our medical and law

schools did not, as a rule, become attached to our universities until

the second half of the nineteenth century, and even late in that. This

was to the serious detriment of post-graduate work, and especially

detrimental to the preliminary training required for it, and

consequently to the products of these schools.

Before a student could enter one of the post-graduate departments at

the University of Mexico in law or medicine, he was required to have

made at least three years of studies in the undergraduate departments.

When we contrast this regulation with the custom in the United States,

the result is a little startling. Until the last quarter of the

nineteenth century students might enter our medical schools straight

from the plow or the smithy or the mechanic's bench, and without any

preliminary education, after two terms of medical lectures consisting

of four months each, be given a degree which was a license to practise

medicine. The abuses of such a system are manifest, and actually came

into existence. They were not permitted in Mexico even in the

seventeenth century.

It might perhaps be thought that these magnificent opportunities in

education were provided {329} only for the higher classes, or

concerned only book learning and the liberal and professional studies.

Far from any such exclusiveness as this, their schools were thoroughly

rounded and gave instruction in the arts and crafts and recognized the

value of manual training. We have only come to appreciate in the last

few decades how much we have lost in education in America by

neglecting these features of education for the masses. While Germany

has manual training for over fifty per cent. of the children who go to

her schools, here in the United States we provide it for something

less than one per cent, of our children. They made no such mistake as

this in the Spanish-American countries. Indeed, Professor Bourne's

paragraph on this subject is perhaps the most interesting feature of

what he has to say with regard to education in Spanish America. The

objective methods of education, as he depicts them, the thoroughly

practical content of education, and the fact that the Church was one

of the main factors in bringing about this well-rounded education, is

of itself a startling commentary on the curiously perverted notions

that have been held in the past with regard to the comparative value

of education in Spanish and in English America and the attitude of the

Church toward these educational questions:

"Both the Crown and the Church were solicitous for education in the

colonies, and provisions were made for its promotion on a far

greater {330} scale than was possible or even attempted in the

English colonies. The early Franciscan missionaries built a school

beside each church, and in their teaching abundant use was made of

signs, drawings and paintings. The native languages were reduced to

writing, and in a few years Indians were learning to read and write.

Pedro de Gante, a Flemish lay brother and a relative of Charles V,

founded and conducted in the Indian quarter in Mexico a great

school, attended by over a thousand Indian boys, which combined

instruction in elementary and higher branches, the mechanical and

fine arts. In its workshops the boys were taught to be tailors,

carpenters, blacksmiths, shoemakers and painters."

If there was all this of progress in education in Spanish-American

countries in advance of what we had in the United States, people will

be prone to ask where, then, are the products of the Spanish-American

education? This is only a fair question, and if the products cannot be

shown, their education, however pretentious, must have been merely

superficial or hollow, and must have meant nothing for the culture of

their people. We are sure that most people would consider the question

itself quite sufficient for argument, for it would be supposed to be

unanswerable.

Such has been the state of mind created by history as it is written

for English-speaking people, that we are not at all prepared to think

that there {331} can possibly be in existence certain great products

of Spanish-American education that show very clearly how much better

educational systems were developed in Spanish than in English America.

The fact that we do not know them, however, is only another evidence

of the one-sidedness of American education in the North, even at the

present time. Our whole attitude toward the South American people, our

complacent self-sufficiency from which we look down on them, our

thoroughgoing condescension for their ignorance and backwardness, is

all founded on our lack of real knowledge with regard to them.

The most striking product of South American education was the

architectural structures which the Spanish-American people erected as

ornaments of their towns, memorials of their culture and evidences of

their education. The cathedrals in the Spanish towns of South America

and Mexico are structures, as a rule, fairly comparable with the

ecclesiastical buildings erected by towns of the same size in Europe.

As a rule, they were planned at least in the sixteenth century, and

most of them were finished in the seventeenth century. Their

cathedrals are handsome architectural structures worthy of their faith

and enduring evidence of their taste and love of beauty. The

ecclesiastical buildings, the houses of their bishops and archbishops

and their monasteries were worthy of their cathedrals and churches.

Most of them are beautiful, all of them are dignified, all of them had

{332} a permanent character that has made them endure down to our day

and has made them an unfailing ornament of the towns in which they

are. Their municipal buildings partook of this same type. Some of them

are very handsome structures. Of their universities we have already

heard that they were imposing buildings from without, handsomely

decorated within.

It must not be forgotten that the Spanish Americans practically

invented the new style of architecture. How effective that style is,

we had abundant opportunity to see when it was employed for the

building of the Pan-American Exposition at Buffalo. That style is

essentially American. It is the only new thing that America has

contributed to construction since its settlement. How thoroughly

suitable it was for the climate for which it was invented, those who

have had experience of it in the new hotels erected in Florida, in the

last decade or so, can judge very well. Many of its effects are an

adaptation of classical formulae to buildings for the warm, yet

uncertain climate of many parts of South America. Some of the old

monasteries constructed after this style are beautiful examples of

architecture in every sense of the word. If the Spanish-American monks

had done nothing else but leave us this handsome new model in

architecture they would not have lived in vain, nor would their

influence in American life have been without its enduring effects.

This is a typical {333} product of the higher culture of the South

Spanish-American people.

With regard to the churches, it may be said that the spirit of the

Puritans was entirely opposed to anything like the ornamentation of

their churches, and that, indeed, these were not churches in the usual

sense of the word, but were merely meeting houses. Hence there was not

the same impulse to make them beautiful as lifted the Spanish

Americans into their magnificent expressions of architectural beauty.

On the other hand, there are other buildings in regard to which, if

there had been any real culture in the minds of the English Americans,

we have a right to expect some beauty as well as usefulness. If we

contrast for a moment the hospitals of English and Spanish America the

difference is so striking as to show the lack of some important

quality in the minds of the builders at the north. Spanish-American

hospitals are among the beautiful structures with which they began to

adorn their towns early, and some of them remain at the present day as

examples of the architectural taste of their builders. They were

usually low, often of but one story in height, with a courtyard and

with ample porticos for convalescents, and thick walls to defend them

from the heat of the climate. In many features they surpass many

hospitals that have been built in America until very recent years.

They were modelled on the old mediaeval hospitals, some of which are

very beautiful {334} examples of how to build places for the care of

the ailing.

Contrast for a moment with this the state of affairs that has existed

with regard to our church buildings and our public structures of all

kinds in North America, down to the latter half of the nineteenth

century. We have no buildings dating from before the nineteenth

century that have any pretension to architectural beauty. They were

built merely for utility. Some of them still have an interest for us

because of historical associations, but they are a standing evidence

of the lack of taste of our Anglo-Saxon ancestors. The English poet,

Yeats, said at a little dinner given to him just before he left this

country ten years ago, that no nation can pretend to being cultured

until the very utensils in the kitchen are beautiful as well as

useful. What is to be said, then, of a nation that erects public

buildings that are to be merely useful? As a matter of fact, most of

them were barracks. The American people woke up somewhat in the

nineteenth century, but the awakening was very slow. A few handsome

structures were erected, but it is not until the last decade or two

that we have been able to awaken public taste to the necessity for

having all our public buildings beautiful as well as useful.

The effect of this taste for structural beauty on the appearance of

the streets of their towns was an important element in making them

very different from our cramped and narrow pathways. {335} The late

Mr. Ernest Crosby once expressed this very emphatically in an

after-dinner speech, by detailing his experience with regard to

Havana. He had visited the Cuban capital some twenty years ago, and

found it very picturesque in its old Spanish ways. It is true the

streets were dirty and the death-rate was somewhat high, but the vista

that you saw when you came around the corner of a street, was not the

same that you had seen around every other corner for twenty miles; it

was different. It was largely a city of homes, with some thought of

life being made happy, rather than merely being laborious. It was a

place to live in and enjoy life while it lasted, and not merely a

place to exist in and make money. He came north by land. The first

town that he struck on the mainland, he said, reminded him of Hoboken.

Every other town that he struck in the North reminded him more and

more of Hoboken, until he came to the immortal Hoboken itself. The

American end of the Anglo-Saxon idea seemed to him to make all the

towns like Hoboken as far as possible. There is only one town in this

country that is not like Hoboken, and that is Washington; and whenever

we let the politicians work their wills on that--witness the Pension

Building--it has a tendency to grow more and more like Hoboken.

Perhaps we shall be able to save it. As for Havana, he said he

understood that the death-rate had been cut in two, and that yellow

fever was no longer {336} epidemic there, but he understood also that

the town was growing more and more like Hoboken, so that he scarcely

dared go back to see it.

The parable has a lesson that is well worth driving home for our

people, for it emphasizes a notable lack of culture among the American

people, which did not exist among the Spanish Americans, a lack which

we did not realize until the last decade or two, though it is an

important index of true culture. The hideous buildings that we have

allowed ourselves to live in in America, and, above all, that we have

erected as representing the dignity of city, and only too often even

of state, together with the awful evidence of graft, whenever an

attempt has been made to correct this false taste and erect something

worthy of us, the graft usually spoiling to a very great extent our

best purposes, proclaim an absence of culture in American life that

amounts to a conviction of failure of our education to be liberal in

the true sense of the word.

There were other products of Spanish-American education quite as

striking as the architectural beauties with which Mexicans and South

Americans adorned their towns. Quite as interesting, indeed, as their

architecture is their literature. Ordinarily we are apt to assume that

because we have heard almost nothing of Spanish-American literature,

there must be very little of it, and what little there is must have

very little significance. This is only another one of these examples

{337} of how ridiculous it is to know something "that ain't so."

Spanish-American literature is very rich. It begins very early in the

history of the Spanish settlement. It is especially noteworthy for its

serious products, and when the world's account of the enduring

literature of the past four centuries will be made up much more of

what was written in South America will live than what has been

produced in North America. This seems quite unpatriotic, but it is

only an expression of proper estimation of values, without any of that

amusing self-complacency which so commonly characterizes North

American estimation of anything that is done by our people.

South American literature, in the best sense of that much abused term,

begins shortly after the middle of the sixteenth century, with the

writing of the Spanish poet, Ercilla's, epic, "Araucana," which was

composed in South America during the decade from 1550 to 1560. This is

a literary work of genuine merit, that has attracted the attention of

critics and scholars of all kinds and has given its author a

significant place even in the limited field of epic poetry among the

few great names that the world cares to recall in this literary mode.

Voltaire considered this epic poem a great contribution to literature,

and in the prefatorial essay to his own epic, the "Henriade," he

praises it very highly. The poem takes its name from the Araucanos

Indians, who had risen in revolt against the Spaniards in Chile, and

{338} against whom the poet served for nearly ten years. He did not

learn to despise them, and while the literature which does justice to

the lofty sentiments which sometimes flowed from mouths of great

Indian chiefs, is supposed to be much more recent, Ercilla's most

enthusiastically extolled passage is the noble speech which he has

given to the aged chief, Colocolo, in the "Araucana."

The expedition against the Araucanos inspired two other fine

poems--that of Pedro de Ona, "Arauco Domado," written near the end of

the century, and "Araucana," written by Diego de Santisteban, whose

poem also saw the light before the seventeenth century opened. A

fourth poet, Juan de Castellanos, better than either of these, wrote

"Elegias de Varones Ilustres de Indias." He was a priest who had

served in America, and who remembered some of the magnificent traits

of the Indians that he had observed during his life among them, and

made them the subject of his poetry. This was only the beginning of a

serious Spanish-American literature, that has continued ever since.

Father Charles Warren Currier, in a series of lectures at the Catholic

Summer School three years ago, did not hesitate to say that the body

of Spanish-American literature was much larger and much more

important, and much more of it was destined to endure than of our

English-American literature. In the light of what these Spaniards had

done for education in their universities, and for the beauty of life

in {339} their cities by their architecture, this is not so surprising

a saying as it might otherwise be. All of these things stand together

and are confirmations one of the other.

The most interesting product of Spanish-American education,

however,--the one which shows that it really stood for a higher

civilization than ours,--remains to be spoken of. It consists of their

treatment of the Indians. From the very beginning, as we have just

shown, their literature in Spanish America did justice to the Indians.

They saw his better traits. It is true they had a better class of

Indians, as a rule, to deal with, but there is no doubt also that they

did much to keep him on a higher level, while everything in North

America that was done by the settlers was prone to reduce the native

in the scale of civilization. He was taught the vices and not the

virtues of civilization, and little was attempted to uplift him. Just

as the literary men were interested in the better side of his

character, so the Spanish-American scientists were interested in his

folklore, in his medicine, in his arts and crafts, in his ethnology

and anthropology--in a word, in all that North Americans have only

come to be interested in during the nineteenth century. Books on all

these subjects were published, and now constitute a precious fund of

knowledge with regard to the aborigines that would have been lost only

for the devotion of Spanish-American scholars.

It is not surprising, then, that the Indian {340} himself, with all

this interest in him, did not disappear, as in North America, but has

remained to constitute the basis of South American peoples. If the

South American peoples are behind our own in anything, it is because

large elements in them have been raised from a state of semi-barbarism

into civilization, while our people have all come from nations that

were long civilized and we have none at all of the natives left.

Wherever the English went always the aborigines disappeared before

them. The story is the same in New Zealand and Australia as it is in

North America, and it would be the same in India, only for the teeming

millions that live in that peninsula, for whom Anglo-Saxon

civilization has never meant an uplift in any sense of the word, but

rather the contrary. The white man's burden has been to carry the

Indian, instilling into him all the vices, until no longer he could

cling to his shifty master and was shaken off to destruction.

This story of the contrast of the treatment of the Indian at the North

and the South is probably the best evidence for the real depth of

culture that the magnificent education of the Spaniards, so early and

so thoroughly organized in their colonies, accomplished for this

continent. Alone it would stand as the highest possible evidence of

the interest of the Spanish Government and the Spanish Church in the

organization not only of education, but of government in such a way as

to bring happiness and uplift for {341} both natives and colonists in

the Spanish-American countries. Abuses there were, as there always

will be where men are concerned and where a superior race comes in

contact with an inferior. These abuses, however, were exceptions and

not the rule. The policy instituted by the Spaniards and maintained in

spite of the tendencies of men to degenerate into tyranny and misuse

of the natives is well worthy of admiration. English-speaking history

has known very little of it until comparatively recent years. Mr.

Sidney Lee, the editor of the English Biographical Dictionary and the

author of a series of works on Shakespeare which has gained for him

recognition as probably the best living authority on the history of

the Elizabethan times, wrote a series of articles which appeared in

Scribner's last year on "The Call of the West." This was meant to undo

much of the prejudice which exists in regard to Spanish colonization

in this country and to mitigate the undue reverence in which the

English explorers and colonists have been held by comparison. There

seems every reason to think, then, that this newer, truer view of

history is gradually going to find its way into circulation. In the

meantime it is amusing to look back and realize how much prejudice has

been allowed to warp English history in this matter, and how, as a

consequence of the determined, deliberate efforts to blacken the

Spanish name, we have had to accept as history exactly the opposite

view to the {342} reality in this matter. Lest we should be thought to

be exaggerating, we venture to quote one of the opening paragraphs of

Mr. Sidney Lee's article as it appeared in Scribner's for May, 1907:

"Especially has theological bias justified neglect or facilitated

misconception of Spain's role in the sixteenth century drama of

American history. Spain's initial adventures in the New World are

often consciously or unconsciously overlooked or underrated in order

that she may figure on the stage of history as the benighted champion

of a false and obsolete faith, which was vanquished under divine

protecting Providence by English defenders of the true religion. Many

are the hostile critics who have painted sixteenth century Spain as

the avaricious accumulator of American gold and silver, to which she

had no right, as the monopolist of American trade, of which she robbed

others, and as the oppressor and exterminator of the weak and innocent

aborigines of the new continent who deplored her presence among them.

Cruelty in all its hideous forms is, indeed, commonly set forth as

Spain's only instrument of rule in her sixteenth century empire. On

the other hand, the English adventurer has been credited by the same

pens with a touching humanity, with the purest religious aspirations,

with a romantic courage which was always at the disposal of the

oppressed native.

Education: How Old The New · 第 19 / 26 段