CHAPTER XI

LES AMERICAINES

Many Americans swing round the calendar with the fashionable

Parisiennes. Some of them, having married into the innermost circles

of the French aristocracy, belong to the most exclusive French set and

jealously guard their privileges, associating little with their own

countrywomen of the American colony, for there is a world of difference

between the Parisian social standing of the American woman who has

married into an aristocratic French family and the American woman of

the American colony. The latter may be brilliant, popular, and rich,

may entertain extravagantly and live in a whirl of gaiety; but, as

a rule, there are certain Parisian salons to which she has not the

entrée, certain doors stubbornly closed to her, despite her beauty

and wit and wealth. There are exceptions, of course, but, generally

speaking, the hostess of the American colony does not have upon her

visiting list the names of the greatest ladies of the French set. Her

dinners cost more than any given in the Faubourg St. Germain, her

cotillion favours are a nine days' Parisian wonder, she draws round

her a wealthy and amusing circle of fellow Americans and foreigners,

but she has not the open sesame to French doors which other Americans

have gained by marriage,--paying dearly sometimes for their social

privileges.

The American colony is a shifting, transient thing, changing

continually, yet always the same in its general character and always

an important factor in Parisian life. Americans living in other parts

of Europe drift into Paris at some seasons to swell this colony, or

join the crowd on the Riviera or on the Normandy coast; and then there

is always the casual visitor, the American who runs over to Europe for

frocks or frivolity, but makes no pretence of living abroad.

Among this last group are a majority of the smartest folk of American

society, and a number of these passing visitors are accorded social

honours seldom granted to the resident American in Paris. It is

among these women, too, that the Parisian tradesmen find their most

profitable patrons, and a large percentage of the loveliest confections

turned out by the great dressmakers of Paris is carried away in the

trunks of private American customers.

It would be hard to overestimate the importance of the American woman

in the Parisian fashion scheme. She pays out more money to the famous

dressmakers and milliners of Paris than all of their other private

patrons taken together; and, even when she herself is not of the

class that does its shopping in Paris, still she swells the receipts

of Paris tradesfolk, for in order to satisfy her tastes an army of

American buyers goes to Paris twice a year and carries home French

materials, French models, and French ideas, which will be incorporated

into the output of all American caterers to woman's vanity, from the

manufacturer of inexpensive, ready-made frocks to the swellest of New

York dressmakers.

In 1893, Worth went to the trouble of looking up Parisian dress

statistics and found that the value of the material consumed annually

in France for women's dress was two hundred million dollars; that one

hundred million dollars' worth was supplied to the Parisian dressmakers

and that the American share of the whole amount was more than that of

all other countries counted together. The statistics also showed that

fully one half of the Parisian dressmakers' sales was carried off in

personal luggage,--which, of course, means private sales.

All this figuring was done thirteen years ago and at that time the

sales had increased two hundred and fifty per cent within twenty-five

years. Since then the rate of increase has been even greater. American

extravagance in dress has advanced in great leaps, and M. Worth's

figures would doubtless seem small if compared with to-day's statistics.

The dressmakers of Paris are, of course, disinclined to give

information concerning the amounts of money paid to them by their

private customers, but they are willing enough to give estimates

without names attached, and the extravagant expenditures of certain

wealthy Americans are common gossip in the dressmaking circles of Paris.

The most important single order for dress ever placed in Europe came

from an American source, but, for certain private reasons, it did not

find its way to Paris, and there was weeping, wailing, and gnashing of

teeth, mixed with the buzzing gossip of the Parisian ateliers when the

facts concerning this famous order leaked out.

A bride's trousseau was the occasion for the spectacular outlay, and

Drecoll of Vienna was the lucky dressmaker. Just what the bill amounted

to, the firm has never been indiscreet enough to confess; but well

authenticated reports place the sum at two hundred thousand dollars,

and rumour runs it up to two hundred and fifty thousand dollars.

The items were enumerated in the order, but carte blanche was given in

every case and all that was demanded was that each garment should be

as nearly perfect for its purpose as the firm could make it. Life has

nothing better to offer an artist dressmaker than an opportunity such

as this, and the Viennese firm endeavoured to live up to the situation.

There was, for example, a certain long cloth coat on the list. It was

to be green, of a shade indicated, and it was to have for trimming

six Imperial Russian sable skins. The skins were to be of the finest

quality and perfectly matched. No limit was set to the price. A simple

matter this, in the estimation of the novice, but Drecoll knows better.

Three of the skins desired were obtained without trouble, a fourth was

secured after some search, a fifth was found far from Vienna, but the

sixth proved a will-o'-the-wisp. Buyers chased it from one end of

Europe to another. There were plenty of superb sables, but not one to

match perfectly the other five, and the maker's faith was pledged, his

blood was up. St. Petersburg, Nijni Novgorod, Leipsic, Paris, London,

all the great fur markets knew the hunters of that sixth skin, and

the quarry was finally run to earth and added to the collar of the

unassuming coat provided for an American bride. Not one person out of a

thousand could have gauged the value of the furs, could have understood

the perfection with which they were matched, but one can imagine that

a dressmaking establishment does not organize an all-Europe sable hunt

for any small sum.

In that matter of furs, our American women have become recklessly

lavish. Everyone can remember the time when even the most fashionable

of society women considered one sealskin coat a cherished possession

justifying pride. Now, women of the multi-millionaire set will buy a

twenty-thousand-dollar sable coat as nonchalantly as though it were a

linen duster. One New York importer who caters largely to the ultra

swell clique went abroad last fall commissioned to buy three sable

coats, two of which were to cost any sum up to twenty thousand dollars,

while the price of the third might soar to thirty thousand if the buyer

should find what he would consider good value for that sum. There are

several forty-thousand-dollar sable coats in this country, and sets

costing from five thousand to ten thousand dollars may be counted by

the hundreds.

Moreover, the fashionable woman does not content herself with one set

of furs, but buys them to match her costumes, as she would buy a veil

or a pair of gloves, and will own perhaps a dozen sets, discarding

immediately any that begin to show wear or are not of the latest cut.

One Western woman bought five fur coats in New York this season, one

a superb affair of sable, one a motor coat, and the other three fancy

short coats trimmed in lace and embroidery. Now that no one with money

spends a summer in a warm climate, the fashionable woman's furs are in

commission all the year round, and the American, like the Parisienne,

will wear her sables over a summer frock in August, if she is where the

temperature is chilly. Naturally the wear and tear is greater than in

the old days when furs were carefully put away during half the year,

and the modern élégante's furs have to be frequently replenished.

My lady's furs are only one item of many included in her year's

wardrobe, and the other items are proportionately expensive. The heads

of establishments counting among their clientèles the wealthiest

women of New York and of the other important American cities were

consulted in the compiling of the list that follows, and were asked for

conservative estimates of the sums spent annually for goods in their

lines, by a representative woman of the very smart set. In every case

the authority consulted emphasized the fact that some of our women

spend much more than the sum mentioned, and that occasionally, for some

special reason, a customer will plunge into phenomenal extravagance.

Here is the list, which is, after all, but a fragmentary one, for it

is hard to estimate upon the thousand and one little things of dress:

Evening gowns $3,500

Dinner gowns 3,500

Carriage and reception gowns 3,000

Street frocks 2,500

Automobile and sports 1,500

Negligées 1,500

Lingerie 2,500

Fur 2,000

Gloves, parasols, hosiery, neckwear, etc. 2,500

Hats 1,200

-------

$23,700

The reader who has not looked into the matter may consider this sum

total an exaggerated one; but, on the contrary, it is, while of course

only approximate, a very modest average made up from the figures

furnished by reliable tradesfolk in positions warranting their speaking

authoritatively. Furs, for instance, set down at two thousand dollars

a year, sometimes mount to forty thousand in one season. Twenty-five

hundred dollars may seem an appalling amount to pay out for lingerie

during the year, but one authority quoted four thousand dollars and

another thirty-five hundred, and both added that there were New

York women who spent even more than that. At Mademoiselle Corne's

place,--perhaps the most fashionable of the lingerie establishments

of Paris, an inquirer was shown several trunkfuls of fine lingerie

ready to be sent to an American customer, and among the items were

sets of three pieces priced at nine hundred francs (one hundred and

eighty dollars), lingerie tea-jackets at four hundred francs, lingerie

petticoats at three hundred and fifty francs. At that rate twenty-five

hundred dollars will not go so very far, and in this day of lingerie

marvellously embellished with handwork and real lace, prices mount to

surprising heights.

The elaborate negligée is of comparatively recent acceptance in

America, but now the boudoir gown and tea-gown are considered important

by chic Americans, and five hundred dollars is no unusual price for an

exquisite tea-gown. One New York woman bought three at that price from

a Paris maker last fall, so fifteen hundred dollars is surely a mild

figure for the year's negligées.

Twenty-five hundred dollars will not begin to pay for the gloves, silk

stockings, parasols, fans, and such little accessories bought by a

woman of the class under consideration, during a year and no estimate

has been made upon jewels, for there the scale may slide to any figure.

All this expert testimony as to the extravagance of the American woman

of fashion may vex the souls of the righteous and lead the philosopher

and student of social economy to gloomy prophecy concerning the future

of American society, but the moralizing may be done elsewhere. Here

is only a statement of facts, and it is undeniably a fact that the

fashionable women of America spend more upon personal luxuries than

any other class in the world, save only a small group of Parisian

demi-mondaines.

It is not only the New York woman who is extravagant, though since

wealth is concentrated there, that city is the headquarters of the

spenders. The spirit has spread all over our country, and wherever one

finds great American fortunes, there one finds the woman of the costly

frocks and furs and jewels.

The largest single order ever placed with a Parisian dressmaker was

given to Worth by a Chicago woman--and an elderly woman, not socially

conspicuous despite her wealth. Twenty-five trunks were used for

shipping the order, and one hundred and forty expensive garments were

packed into the trays. Every city of importance and a host of the small

towns are represented upon the books of the Paris houses. The City of

Mexico has a clique of society women famous for dress, and the South

American trade is considered very important in Paris. Dwellers in the

States have a "magerful" fashion of appropriating the term American for

their own private use, and appear to harbour a vague general idea that

south of Palm Beach and Miami a bead necklace is the accepted costume;

but the tradesfolk of Paris know better. Crowds of wealthy South

Americans flock into Paris each summer and spend money lavishly upon

clothes, jewels, and all the other luxuries of a prodigal civilization.

In all the South American capitals one finds the woman of the French

frock, and Buenos Ayres, in particular, has a smart set remarkable for

the fashion and extravagance of its women.

Naturally it is not only in the province of clothes the money-spending

mania of America asserts itself. Among Americans of wealth the cost of

living has swelled to a startling figure. Numerous magnificent homes

equipped with every luxury that money can buy, entertainment on a

princely scale, servants by the score, horses, carriages, automobiles,

steam-yachts,--all these are the necessities of the multi-millionaire

who is in society. The floral decorations for a dinner or ball often

cost thousands of dollars, and five hundred dollars' worth of flowers

for a small dinner in New York or Newport is no unusual order.

Cotillion favours for a large ball have been known to cost ten thousand

dollars, and thousands of dollars go to the caterer upon such an

occasion.

When the Castellanes, during their social career, spent forty thousand

dollars on one evening's entertainment, all Paris was agog, but that

sum has been far exceeded for single social functions in New York, and

from ten thousand dollars to twenty thousand dollars is no surprising

cost for a successful ball.

Every year the social standards mount higher, in point of expenditure,

and new methods of getting rid of money are added to the already long

list. The motor, for example, has added from fifteen thousand to twenty

thousand dollars to the annual expenditure of numerous wealthy men

who have motor mania in its acute form, buy many superb cars, employ

expensive machinists and chauffeurs, build fine garages, and race their

cars.

But all this extraordinary lavishness is confined to a comparatively

small part of our population, affects but a little clique of

millionaires, and while even in smart society a large contingent is

living beyond its means, a majority of the most extravagant American

money-spenders have fortunes ample enough to justify their annual

expenditures--at least from a financial point of view. It is the

increasing extravagance in dress and luxury among the classes of more

moderate incomes that is most interesting to a social student, and the

American tendency is, proportionately, as marked here as in wealthier

circles.

All along the social line American women are spending more for dress

than ever before. Each year marks a rise in the grade of goods demanded

and sold, and manufacturers, merchants, and dressmakers all testify to

the remarkable improvement in American standards of dress during recent

years.

The rise of the ready-made frock has had much to do with bringing

about this result, and few outsiders have any conception of the growth

and importance of this industry. Forty years ago very few models were

brought to this country from Europe, and very few women even of the

wealthiest class knew much about Paris shopping. As for the woman

of humble social position she was quite out of touch with French

fashion. About thirty-eight years ago, A. T. Stewart launched the

first ready-made frocks, and record has it that they were frights.

Shortly after that there were four small establishments in the United

States manufacturing women's ready-made garments. To-day there are

forty-eight hundred houses devoted to such business in New York City

alone, and some of the largest American dressmaking factories are in

towns outside of New York,--in Cleveland, Chicago, Philadelphia, and

Baltimore. Everyone of these manufacturers sends men to Paris at least

twice during the season to buy models, obtain sketches, notes, and

ideas. Even the cheapest of the ready-made costumes to-day has in it

some faint echo of Parisian art, and there are American manufacturers

of ready-made coats and frocks who make no low-class goods at all.

If one walks into Paquin's establishment and pays five hundred dollars

for a frock, one feels that she is paying a good price, but there are

specialty houses in New York turning out ready-made models at five

hundred dollars and making nothing for less than one hundred dollars;

and these expensive costumes find ready sale.

Occasionally a woman retains the old-time prejudice against ready-made

garments and wonders why anyone will pay two or three hundred dollars

for a ready-made gown. Given a choice between a gown made to order

by Paquin and one at the same price from a New York manufacturer, it

would doubtless be the part of wisdom to take the Paquin creation; but

there is no Paquin in New York, and though there are some exceedingly

good dressmakers here, there are also many who charge high prices

without the ability to justify them. Many women who have had disastrous

experiences with such makers claim that, at least, in a ready-made

frock one can be sure of the general effect, and that if it comes from

a good maker, whether French or American, and is well cut to begin

with, it will even after alteration fit better and do more for one's

figure than a made-to-order gown from incompetent hands.

There are still cheap ready-made garments on the market, but demand for

good materials and fine workmanship is steadily growing and, through

the efforts of manufacturers to meet this demand, ideas of better

dressing have been spread broadcast.

Fortunes have been made quickly by men who have kept step with this

improvement in taste and supplied good models of Parisian design and

excellent workmanship for the American ready-made trade.

One manufacturer came to this country twelve years ago, in the

steerage, and went upon a tailor's bench at fifteen dollars a week.

He was a Russian or Polish Jew, which is equivalent to saying that

he belonged to the greatest money-making race on earth. He saved a

little money, opened workrooms. To-day he has a factory in which he

employs nine hundred men and women, he lives in a beautiful home on

Riverside Drive, he goes to business in a big automobile, he has done a

two-million-dollar business within the last year--and all in ready-made

frocks of the better grades.

There is much talk of sweat-shop labour in connection with women's

ready-made clothing, but as a matter of fact only the very cheapest of

the ready-made trade is associated with the sweat-shop. Years ago some

of the better shops declared a crusade against such labour and tabooed

the factories dealing with it. The other big firms fell in line, and

manufacturers, realizing that their trade was at stake, came up to the

mark in respect to the housing, treatment, and wages of employees.

The manufacturer of the twelve-year record has a factory absolutely

sanitary and treats his nine hundred employees admirably, even

supporting a small hotel in which he harbours any of his work folk

who may be ill or in trouble and need help. These workers are chiefly

Polish and Russian Jews and Italians, the German contingent, which was

once large, having almost disappeared, and wages are good. Competent

men tailors are always in demand and can make at least from fifteen to

eighteen dollars a week, while many of them get as high as from forty

to eighty dollars. Some of the manufacturers have salesmen on the road

at fifteen thousand dollars a year, and even pay as high as twenty-two

thousand dollars.

The buyers, too, command large salaries, and these salaried men very

frequently become manufacturers themselves or open specialty shops

for the sale of ready-made garments. One New York salesman, who has

recently gone into the retail business in a comparatively small way,

cleared one hundred thousand dollars last year and will do better

this year. Another man of ability went to the head of one of the big

dry-goods houses here and asked for a good position.

"Why don't you open workrooms of your own?" he was asked. "Haven't you

any money?"

"Only twenty-five hundred dollars."

"That's enough. Go rent some rooms. We know what you can do. Let us

know when you are ready and we'll place an order with you for four

times twenty-five hundred dollars." That was eleven years ago. The

manufacturer retired with a fortune some time since and amuses himself

now by speculating largely in real estate.

One of the few dressmaking geniuses in this country is another

manufacturer of ready-made frocks--but of the highest class models

only. He failed at first,--possibly because he _was_ a genius, but nine

years ago he took a fresh start and now he is a millionaire--but still

an artist. He takes a handful of silk and throws it at a figure, gives

it a pull here, a plait there, and voilà!--an effect better than his

rivals could obtain through careful and painstaking labour. In Paris

that man would be great. Here he is merely rich, and his million keeps

him from Paris.

All these stories of success and these business statistics merely

serve to illustrate the point with which the discussion of ready-made

clothing began, the increasing taste and extravagance of American

dress. The American woman, whether of wealth or of very moderate means,

insists upon having good clothes and is getting them.

Perhaps she buys them ready-made, perhaps she goes to Paris for them,

perhaps she has them made by dressmakers who go to Paris for their

models, but, in any case, she has them. For the same amount of money

her mother spent she will obtain better artistic results,--but she

spends more money than her mother dreamed of spending and more money

than she herself would have thought of spending ten years ago. An

education in extravagant dress comes easily to any woman, and once

educated to the topmost notch of the domestic dress production, the

Parisian frock is the American's next requirement.

There are good dressmakers on this side of the water, quite good enough

to satisfy any save the hyper-fastidious, but our best dressmakers do

not go about their business as do the best dressmakers of Paris. They

are business men or women, their French fellow craftsmen are artists.

There is in Paris the same type of dressmaker we have here, but there

is, too, the artist dressmaker who is something higher in the scale,

and it is through him that Paris is the fountain-head of fashion.

There is little original work in dress here. Good workmanship we have.

Our plain tailor work, for example, is the best in the world; but our

makers are content to copy French ideas and French models and they

have no such high standards as have the sponsors of those models. The

Irish-American dressmaker is said to be, next to the French, the best

in the world, but she adapts, she does not create. Perhaps in Paris she

too might soar, but here she copies French models well, makes money,

and is content.

In the early spring and in August there is a migration of American

dressmakers. By the hundred they go to Paris, and buyers from all over

the country swell the crowd. Some of the important buyers have set sail

long before, but they are men who represent extensive interests, with

whom buying is a fine art and to whose expense account the home firm

sets no limitations.

One American buyer, representing the largest importer of model gowns

and cloaks in this country, a man better known, perhaps, than any of

his profession, in the famous Parisian ateliers, sees the models in

these ateliers before the ordinary buyer is given a glimpse of them.

Yet even then they are no new things to him. He has seen all of their

most striking features before.

He does not drop into Paris with the buying flock, visit the great

dressmaking establishments, and accept as law and gospel whatever

chances to be shown there. He knows what is what. The dressmakers know

that he knows and treat him accordingly.

For months he has been on a still hunt for the fashions of the spring

that is yet distant. He stopped in Madeira at the very beginning of the

winter season, for he knows, as the Parisian dressmakers know, that an

exclusive little coterie of the world's smartest folk begins its winter

with a few weeks in Madeira, and that in the Funchal toilettes are to

be found many hints that will become laws when springtime comes to

Paris.

Early in December the hunter follows the trail to Algiers and on to

Cairo, though since the automobile has made Italian touring a fad, many

of the smart folk spend a part of their winter in motoring, and the

Algiers and Cairo seasons are not quite what they were as gathering

places for the fashion clans.

A little later the cream of the fashionable world is on the Riviera,

and our buyer haunts the Monte Carlo Casino during February. No

smallest fashion straw escapes his watchful eye. He knows the fashion

leaders of all Europe and America by sight. He can cap each striking

costume with the name of the wearer, and, probably with the name of

the maker, and he uses his time profitably until, late in the month,

the birds of fine feathers take wing once more. It is almost time for

Auteuil and, from all over the world, fashionable folk are pouring into

Paris.

Spring models are on view there in the great ateliers, and this

American receives respectful attention at the hands of the dressmakers,

for his orders will be large--and have been large for many years past.

Moreover, he has by this time a very good idea of what he wants, and

he will demand exclusive models instead of taking the models prepared

for the majority of the dressmaking and buying pilgrims. He knew

many of the autocrats of fashion when they first put up their signs

and, through the advertisement and backing of his firm, many a Paris

dressmaker now famous obtained the American clientèle that was the

foundation of his fortunes.

A valuable customer this, and there are other Americans of his class

who see the best that Paris has to offer. Some of the more important

American dressmakers also place large orders, insist upon exclusive

models, and are greeted impressively by the saleswomen; but the most of

the crowd buys as little as possible and sees as much as it can, and

the saleswomen, fully alive to this fact, make a point of allowing the

minor dressmakers to see as little as is consistent with courteous

treatment. Often a group of little dressmakers will form a syndicate

to buy one model and will go together to the great establishment.

There, being really buyers, they are politely received, and they all

take mental notes of every fashion hint that comes their way during

the visit. They study Paris fashions, too, wherever they are to be

seen, on the streets, in the theatres, at the restaurants; and during

their summer visit they perhaps run up to Trouville to see the fashion

show there. They have a jolly time as well as a profitable one, and

after a few weeks come home to spread French fashion news from Maine

to California, and furnish such adaptations of what they have seen as

their varying abilities can accomplish.

The clever buyer usually stays on in Paris after the crowd of his

countrymen and of European dressmakers has departed; for the more

exclusive models and ideas are reserved for the delectation of the chic

Parisienne and the private buyer, and he wants to see what is offered

to this clientèle as well as what is shown to the trade. Finally he

too sails for home, where much of his plunder has arrived before him.

American women often wear a Parisian mode before it has been worn in

Paris, and this is especially true of autumn modes; for Parisiennes are

still away from Paris when American dressmakers and buyers are securing

and sending over their autumn models, and, too, an American woman

travelling in Europe for the summer may buy her fall outfit in Paris

during August, bring it home and begin wearing it in September, before

Parisiennes have left the seashore and settled down to thought of fall

clothes. This applies, however, chiefly to the few American fashion

leaders, and a radical Parisian mode seldom achieves actual popularity

in America before late in the season or perhaps the following season.

The models have been brought over and shown, have been bought and worn

by the knowing and courageous; but the great crowd of American women

is slightly conservative and hesitates to take up any radical Parisian

fad until after the novelty has become somewhat familiar through being

exploited by the ultra-fashionable few.

One of the greatest Parisian dressmakers said recently in a private

conversation that he never felt confident of general popularity for an

original and striking model until after seeing it upon one or two of

his most chic American customers.

"I do not know what it is," he said, "but there is something

distinctive about the way an American wears her clothes,--a grace,

an elegance, but also a naturalness. A Frenchwoman has a genius for

dress, but she makes up for her toilette. She is supremely artificial;

she will wear anything that is launched and make herself up to fit the

mode. Your American doesn't do that. She wears her clothes superbly,

but the clothes must be of a kind she can wear. That a Parisienne looks

well in a model means nothing as an indication of what women in general

will think of the innovation; but when I put the model upon one of my

best American customers, I know at once what to expect. They are lovely

in their chiffons, those Americans, provided they have possibilities

of loveliness. It is a pleasure to dress them."

There are American women who go to Paris regularly three times a year

to replenish their wardrobes, and these private American customers

are the apple of the dressmaker's eye. Madame will perhaps be in

Paris only a few days. Everything is made to bend to her fittings,

her own particular saleswoman gives up the days to her, the heads of

the departments are called in for advice and assistance, the master

himself gives the frocks his personal attention. There is a couch in

the private fitting-room upon which Madame may lie down if she becomes

tired, the daintiest of luncheons will be served to her there if she

has not time or inclination to go elsewhere. Everything is made so

smooth, so agreeable, and if the bills are large, what is that to

the wife or daughter of an American multi-millionaire? There are New

York women whose dressmaking bills in Paris run up to fifty and sixty

thousand dollars in one year, but who could afford to spend five

hundred thousand a year on clothes if they chose to do it.

Occasionally nowadays a fashion originates in America and crosses to

Paris. The tourist coat with loose belted back, the long tailored coat,

the walking skirt, the floating veil--all these were worn in New York

and later taken up by smart Parisiennes, but the fashion tide usually

sets the other way, and we accept slavishly what Paris furnishes.

The great French dressmakers to a certain extent control the fashions,

but they work with the manufacturers. One will see the head of a great

silk factory sitting at a table with Beer or Paquin or Doeuillet in

the Café de Paris, and talking earnestly, seriously. Materials for the

future season are being weighed in the balance. The artist dressmaker

is the manufacturer's critic, his guide, philosopher, and friend, and

in this close connection lies one of the secrets of artistic French

dressmaking. In Paris one can always obtain the wherewithal to carry

out an idea. If necessary the manufacturer will make the material

expressly for Monsieur's purpose, and many an exquisite fabric has

begun and ended with one length run through the loom. The dressmaker

and his customer wanted that especial thing and wanted the gown to

be absolutely unique. Expense was not considered and one can obtain

anything in Paris if one will pay for it. Once an order came from a

great lady in Rome. She wanted a ball gown such as she described for

a certain occasion. The maker had only three days' time in which to

execute the order, and the quantities of white pansies which must

absolutely be the trimming were not to be found in Paris. Discouraging?

Not in the least. Monsieur set a multitude of flower-makers at work

making white pansies for him. The frock was finished and sent from

Paris to Rome by a special messenger. Time was too short to admit of

experiments with express companies.

When the American dressmaker or professional buyer chooses a model,

cards to the manufacturers who furnished the fabric and trimmings

for the frock are given her and she buys the materials for as many

duplicates of the model as she expects to make. She buys other

materials, too, laces, buttons, novelties of all kinds, that will

enable her to achieve frocks differing from those of her rivals, and

skilful Parisian buying is to-day a very vital part of the fashionable

American dressmaker's business. Duties upon the importations are of

course tremendous, and during certain months the New York Custom House

is so choked with French chiffons that there are maddening delays in

getting the boxes through.

Paris would miss les Americaines if they should suddenly lose their

interest in French clothes, but there's no danger of that event. Paris

is the fashion centre and will continue to be the fashion centre. As

for our women--each year they grow more ardent in their worship of the

Vanities.

* * * * * *

Transcriber's note:

Plain print and punctuation errors were corrected.

In Vanity Fair: A Tale of Frocks and Femininity · 第 11 / 11 章