I awoke at some dim hour of the night in the clutch of insupportable

fear; let me say at once that with the miserable weeks that followed

there was mingled much of physical and nervous suffering, far more,

indeed, than I then knew, or was permitted to know. I had been reading

hard, and throwing myself with unaccustomed energy into a hundred new

ideas and speculations. I had had a few weeks before a sudden attack of

sleeplessness, which should have warned me of overstrain. But now every

nervous misery known to man beset me—intolerable depression, spectral

remorse, nocturnal terrors. My work was neglected. I read the Bible

incessantly, and prayed for the hour together. Sometimes my depression

would leave me for a few hours, like a cat playing with a mouse, and leap

upon me like an evil spirit in the middle of some social gathering or

harmless distraction, striking the word from my lips and the smile from

my face.

For some weeks this lasted, and I think I was nearly mad. Two strange

facts I will record. One day, beside myself with agitation, seeing no way

out—for my prayers seemed to batter, as it were, like waves against a

stony and obdurate cliff, and no hope or comfort ever slid into my soul—I

wrote two letters: one to an eminent Roman Catholic, in whose sermons I

had found some encouragement, and one to the elder friend I have above

spoken of. In two days I received the answers. That from the Romanist

hard, irritated, and bewildered—my only way was to submit myself to true

direction, and he did not see that I had any intention of doing this;

that it was obvious that I was being plagued for some sin which I had not

ventured to open to him. I burnt the letter with a hopeless shudder. The

other from my old friend, appointing a time to meet me, and saying that

he understood, and that my prayers would avail.

I went soon after to see him, in a dark house in a London square. He

heard me with the utmost patience, bade me believe that I was not _alone_

in my experience; that in many a life there was—there must be—some root

of bitterness that must flower before the true seed could be sown, and

adding many other manly and tender things.

[Sidenote: LIBERTY]

He gave me certain directions, and though I will confess that I could not

follow them for long—the soul must find her own path, I think, among the

crags—yet he led me into a calmer, quieter, more tranquil frame of mind;

he taught me that I must not expect to find the way all at once, that

long coldness and habitual self-deceit must be slowly purged away. But

I can never forget the infinite gratitude I owe him for the loving and

strenuous way in which he brought me out into a place of liberty with the

tenderness of a true father in God.

11

Thus rudely awakened to the paramount necessity of embracing a faith,

bowing to a principle, obeying a gentle force which should sustain

and control the soul, I flung myself for a time with ardour into

theological reading, my end not erudition, but to drink at the source

of life. Is it arrogant to say that I passed through a painful period

of disillusionment? all round the pure well I found traces of strife

and bitterness. I cast no doubt on the sincerity and zeal of those who

had preceded me; but not content with drinking, and finding their eyes

enlightened, they had stamped the margin of the pool into the mire, and

the waters rose turbid and strife-stained to the lip. Some, like cattle

on a summer evening, seemed to stand and brood within the pool itself,

careless if they fouled the waters; others had built themselves booths

on the margin, and sold the precious draughts in vessels of their own,

enraged that any should desire the authentic stream. There was, it

seemed, but little room for the wayfarer; and the very standing ground

was encumbered with impotent folk.

[Sidenote: DISCERNING THE FAITH]

Not to strain a metaphor, I found that the commentators obscured rather

than assisted. What I desired was to realise the character, to divine the

inner thoughts of Jesus, to be fired by the impetuous eloquence of Paul,

to be strengthened by the ardent simplicity of John. These critics, men

of incredible diligence and patience, seemed to me to make a fence about

the law, and to wrap the form I wished to see in innumerable vestments

of curious design. Readers of the Protagoras of Plato will remember how

the great sophist spoke from the centre of a mass of rugs and coverlets,

among which, for his delectation, he lay, while the humming of his

voice filled the arches of the cloister with a heavy burden of sound. I

found myself in the same position as the disciples of Protagoras; the

voice that I longed to hear, spoke, but it had to penetrate through the

wrappings and veils which these men, in their zeal for service, had in

mistaken reverence flung about the lively oracle.

A wise man said to me not long ago that the fault of teaching nowadays

was that knowledge was all coined into counters; and that the desire

of learners seemed to be not to possess themselves of the ore, not to

strengthen and toughen the mind by the pursuit, but to possess themselves

of as many of these tokens as possible, and to hand them on unchanged and

unchangeable to those who came to learn of themselves.

This was my difficulty; the shelves teemed with books, the lecturers

cried aloud in every College court, like the jackdaws that cawed and

clanged about the venerable towers; and for a period I flew with notebook

and pen from lecture to lecture, entering admirable maxims, acute verbal

distinctions, ingenious parallels in my poor pages. At home I turned

through book after book, and imbued myself in the learning of the

schools, dreaming that, though the rind was tough, the precious morsels

lay succulent within.

In this conceit of knowledge I was led to leave my College and to plunge

into practical life; what my work was shall presently be related, but

I will own that it was a relief. I had begun to feel that though I had

learnt the use of the tools, I was no nearer finding the precious metal

of which I was in search.

The further development of my faith after this cannot be told in detail,

but it may be briefly sketched, after a life of some intellectual

activity, not without practical employment, which has now extended over

many years.

[Sidenote: THE FATHER]

I began, I think, very far from Christ. The only vital faith that I had

at first was an intense instinctive belief in the absolute power, the

infinite energies, of the Father; to me he was not only Almighty, as our

weak word phrases it, a Being who could, if he would, exert His power,

but παντοκρατῶρ—all-conquering, all-subduing. I was led, by a process of

mathematical certainty, to see that if the Father was anywhere, He was

everywhere; that if He made us and bade us be, He was responsible for the

smallest and most sordid details of our life and thought, as well as for

the noblest and highest. It cannot indeed be otherwise; every thought

and action springs from some cause, in many cases referable to events

which took place in lives outside of and anterior to our own. In any case

in which a man seems to enjoy the faculty of choice, his choice is in

reality determined by a number of previous causes; given all the data,

his action could be inevitably predicted. Thus I gradually realised that

sin in the moral world, and disease in the physical, are each of them

some manifestation of the Eternal Will. If He gives to me the joy of

life, the energy of action, did He not give it to the subtle fungus, to

the venomous bacteria which, once established in our bodies, are known by

the names of cancer and fever? Why all life should be this uneasy battle

I know not; but if we can predicate consciousness of any kind to these

strange rudiments, the living slime of the pit, is it irreverent to say

that faith may play a part in their work as well? When the health-giving

medicine pours along our veins, what does it mean but that everywhere it

leaves destruction behind it, and that the organisms of disease which

have, with delighted zest, been triumphing in their chosen dwelling and

rioting in the instinctive joy of life, sadly and mutely resign the

energy that animates them, or sink into sleep. It is all a balance, a

strife, a battle. Why such striving and fighting, such uneasy victory

and deep unrest should be the Father’s will for all His creatures, I

know not; but that it _is_ a condition, a law of His own mind, I can

reverently believe. When we sing the _Benedicite_, which I for one do

with all my heart, we must be conscious that it is only a selection,

after all, of phenomena that are impressive, delightful, or useful to

ourselves. Nothing that we call, God forgive us, noxious, finds a place

there. St. Francis, indeed, went further, and praised God for “our sister

the Death of the Body,” but in the larger _Benedicite_ of the universe,

which is heard by the ear of God, the fever and the pestilence, the cobra

and the graveyard worm utter their voices too; and who shall say that the

Father hears them not?

[Sidenote: THE JOY OF THE WORLD]

If one believes that happiness is inch by inch diminishing, that it is

all a losing fight, then it must be granted that we have no refuge but in

a Stoic hardening of the heart; but when we look at life and see the huge

preponderance of joy over pain—such tracts of healthy energy, sweet duty,

quiet movement—indeed when we see, as we often do, the touching spectacle

of hope and joy again and again triumphant over weakness and weariness;

when we see such unselfishness abroad, such ardent desire to lighten the

loads of others and to bear their burdens; then it is faithless indeed

if we allow ourselves to believe that the Father has any end in view but

the ultimate happiness of all the innumerable units, which He endows with

independent energies, and which, one by one, after their short taste of

this beautiful and exquisite world, resign their powers again, often so

gladly, into His hand.

[Sidenote: OUR INSIGNIFICANCE]

But the fault, if I may so phrase it, of this faith, is the vastness

of the conception to which it opens the mind. When I contemplate this

earth with its continents and islands, its mountains and plains, all

stored with histories of life and death, the bones of dead monsters, the

shattered hulks of time; the vast briny ocean with all the mysterious

life that stirs beneath the heaving crests; when I realise that even

this world, with all its infinite records of life, is but a speck in

the heavens, and that every one of the suns of space may be surrounded

with the same train of satellites, in which some tumultuous drama

of life may be, nay, must be enacting itself—that even on the fiery

orbs themselves some appalling Titan forms may be putting forth their

prodigious energies, suffering and dying—the mind of man reels before

the thought;—and yet all is in the mind of God. The consciousness of

the microscopic minuteness of my own life and energies, which yet are

all in all to me, becomes crushing and paralysing in the light of such

a thought. It seems impossible to believe, in the presence of such a

spectacle, that the single life can have any definite importance, and

the temptation comes to resign all effort, to swim on the stream, just

planning life to be as easy and as pleasant as possible, before one sinks

into the abyss.

12

From such a paralysis of thought and life two beliefs have saved me.

[Sidenote: THE MASTER]

First, it may be confessed, came the belief in the Spirit of God, the

thought of inner holiness, not born from any contemplation of the world

around, which seems indeed to point to far different ideals. Yet as true

and truer than the bewildering example of nature is the inner voice

which speaks, after the wind and storm, in the silent solitudes of the

soul. That this voice exists and is heard can admit of no tangible

demonstration; each must speak for himself; but experience forbids me

to doubt that there is something which contradicts the seduction of

appetite, something which calls, as it were, a flush to the face of the

soul at the thought of triumphs of sense, a voice that without being

derisive or harsh, yet has a terrible and instantaneous severity; and

wields a mental scourge, the blows of which are no less fearful to

receive because they are accompanied with no physical disaster. To

recognise this voice as the very voice and word of the Father to sentient

souls, is the inevitable result of experience and thought.

Then came the triumphant belief, weak at first, but taking slow shape,

that the attitude of the soul to its Maker can be something more than a

distant reverence, an overpowering awe, a humble worship; the belief, the

certainty that it can be, as it were, a personal link—that we can indeed

hold converse with God, speak with Him, call upon Him, put to use a human

phrase, our hand in His, only desiring to be led according to His will.

Then came the further step; after some study of the systems of other

teachers of humanity, after a desire to find in the great redeemers of

mankind, in Buddha, Socrates, Mahomet, Confucius, Shakespeare, the secret

of self-conquest, of reconciliation, the knowledge slowly dawns upon the

mind that in Jesus of Galilee alone we are in the presence of something

which enlightens man not from within but from without. The other great

teachers of humanity seem to have looked upon the world and into their

own hearts, and deduced from thence, by flashes of indescribable genius,

some order out of the chaos, some wise and temperate scheme, but with

Jesus—though I long resisted the conviction—it is different. He comes,

not as a man speaking by observation and thought, but as a visitant from

some secret place, who knows the truth rather than guesses at it. I need

not say that his reporters, the Gospel writers, had but an imperfect

conception of His majesty. His ineffable greatness—it could not well be

otherwise; the mystery rather is that with such simple views of life,

such elementary conceptions of the scheme of things, they yet gave so

much of the stupendous truth, and revealed Jesus in his words and acts

as the Divine Man, who spoke to man not by spiritual influences but by

the very authentic utterance of God. Such teaching as the parables, such

scenes as the raising of Lazarus, or the midday talk by the wayside

well of Sychar, emerge from all art and history with a dignity that

lays no claim to the majesty that they win; and as the tragedy darkens

and thickens to its close, such scenes as the trial, recorded by St.

John, and the sacred death, bring home to the mind the fact that no mere

humanity could bear itself with such gentle and tranquil dignity, such

intense and yet such unselfish suffering as were manifested in the Son of

Man.

[Sidenote: THE RETURN]

And so, as the traveller goes out and wanders through the cities of

men, among stately palaces, among the glories of art, or climbs among

the aching solitudes of lonely mountains, or feasts his eyes upon green

isles floating in sapphire seas, and returns to find that the old

strait dwelling-place, the simple duties of life, the familiar friends,

homely though they be, are the true anchors of the spirit; so, after a

weary pilgrimage, the soul comes back, with glad relief, with wistful

tenderness, to the old beliefs of childhood, which, in its pride and

stubbornness, it cast aside, and rejected as weak and inadequate and

faded; finds after infinite trouble and weariness that it has but

learnt afresh what it knew; and that though the wanderer has ransacked

the world, digged and drunk strange waters, trafficked for foreign

merchandise, yet the Pearl of Price, the White Stone is hidden after all

in his own garden-ground, and inscribed with his own new name.

13

I need not enter very closely into the period of my life which followed

the university. After a good deal of hesitation and uncertainty I decided

to enter for the Home Civil Service, and obtained a post in a subordinate

office. The work I found not wholly uninteresting, but it needs no

special record here. I acquired the knowledge of how to conduct business,

a certain practical power of foreseeing contingencies, a certain

acquaintance with legal procedure, and some knowledge of human nature in

its official aspect.

Intellectually and morally this period of my life was rather stagnant.

I had been through a good deal of excitement, of mental and moral

malady, of general _bouleversement_. Nature exacted a certain amount

of quiescence, melancholy quiescence for the most part, because I felt

myself singularly without energy to carry out my hopes and schemes, and

at the same time it seemed that time was ebbing away purposelessly, and

that I was not driving, so to speak, any piles in the fluid and oozy

substratum of ideas on which my life seemed built. To revel in metaphors,

I was like a snake which has with a great strain bolted a quadruped, and

needs a long space of uneasy and difficult digestion. But at the time I

did not see this; I only thought I was losing time: I felt with Milton—

“How soon hath time, the subtle thief of youth,

Stolen on his wing my three-and-twentieth year.”

But beset as I was by the sublime impatience of youth, I had not serenity

enough to follow out the thoughts which Milton works out in the rest of

the sonnet.

[Sidenote: LITERARY WORK]

At the same time, so far as literary work went, to which I felt greatly

drawn, I was not so impatient. I wrote a great deal for my private

amusement, and to practise facility of expression, but with little idea

of hurried publication. A story which I sent to a well-known editor was

courteously returned to me, with a letter in which he stated that he had

read my work carefully, and that he felt it a duty to tell me that it

was “sauce without meat.” This kind and wholesome advice made a great

difference to me; I determined that I would attempt to live a little

before I indulged in baseless generalisation, or lectured other people on

the art of life. I soon gained great facility in writing, and developed a

theory, which I have ever since had no reason to doubt, that performance

is simply a matter of the intensity of desire. If one only wants enough

to complete a definite piece of work, be it poem, essay, story, or some

far more definite and prosaic task, I have found that it gets itself

done in spite of the insistent pressure of other businesses and the

deadening monotony of heavy routine, simply because one goes back to it

with delight, schemes to clear time for it, waits for it round corners,

and loses no time in spurring and whipping the mind to work, which is

necessary in the case of less attractive tasks. The moment that there

comes a leisurely gap, the mind closes on the beloved work like a limpet;

when this happens day after day and week after week, the accumulations

become prodigious.

I thus felt gradually more and more, that when the _magnum opus_ did

present itself to be done, I should probably be able to carry it through;

and meanwhile I had sufficient self-respect, although I suffered twinges

of thwarted ambition, not to force my crude theories, my scrambling

prose, or my faltering verse upon the world.

[Sidenote: LONDON]

Meanwhile I lived a lonely sort of life, with two or three close

intimates. I never really cared for London, but it is at the same time

idle to deny its fascination. In the first place it is full from day to

day of prodigious, astounding, unexpected beauties—sometimes beauty on

a noble scale, in the grand style, such as when the sunset shakes its

hair among ragged clouds, and the endless leagues of house-roofs and the

fronts of town palaces dwindle into a far-off steely horizon-line under

the huge and wild expanse of sky. Sometimes it is the smaller, but no

less alluring beauty of subtle atmospherical effects; and so conventional

is the human appreciation of beauty that the constant presence, in these

London pictures, of straight framing lines, contributed by house-front

and street-end, is an aid to the imagination. Again, there is the beauty

of contrasts; the vignettes afforded by the sudden blossoming of rustic

flowers and shrubs in unexpected places; the rustle of green leaves at

the end of a monotonous street. And then, apart from natural beauty,

there is the vast, absorbing, incredible pageant of humanity, full of

pathos, of wistfulness, and of sweetness. But of this I can say but

little; for it always moved me, and moves me yet, with a sort of horror.

I think it was always to me a spectacular interest; I never felt _one_

with the human beings whom I watched, or even in the same boat, so to

speak, with them; the contemplation of the fact that I am one of so

many millions has been to me a humiliating rather than an inspiring

thought; it dashes the pleasures of individuality; it arraigns the soul

before a dark and inflexible bar. Passing daily through London, there

is little possibility in the case of an imaginative man for hopeful

expansion of the heart, little ground for anything but an acquiescent

acceptance. Under these conditions it is too rudely brought home to me

to be wholesome, how ineffective, undistinguished, typical, minute,

uninteresting any one human being is after all: and though the sight of

humanity in every form is attractive, bewildering, painfully interesting,

thrilling, and astounding—though one finds unexpected beauty and goodness

everywhere—yet I recognise that city life had a deadening effect on my

consciousness, and hindered rather than helped the development of thought

and life.

[Sidenote: THE ARTIST]

Still, in other ways this period was most valuable—it made me practical

instead of fanciful; alert instead of dreamy; it made me feel what I had

never known before, the necessity for grasping the _exact_ point of a

matter, and not losing oneself among side issues. It helped me out of the

entirely amateurish condition of mind into which I had been drifting—and,

moreover, it taught me one thing which I had never realised, a lesson

for which I am profoundly grateful, namely that literature and art play

a very small part in the lives of the majority of people; that most men

have no sort of an idea that they are serious matters, but look upon

them as more or less graceful amusements; that in such regions they have

no power of criticism, and no judgment; but that these are not nearly

such serious defects as the defect of vision which the artist and the

man of letters suffer from and encourage—the defect, I mean, of treating

artistic ideals as matters of pre-eminent national, even of moral

importance. They must be content to range themselves frankly with other

craftsmen; they may sustain themselves by thinking that they may help, a

very little, to ameliorate conditions, to elevate the tone of morality

and thought, to provide sources of recreation, to strengthen the sense

of beauty; but they must remember that they cannot hope to belong to

the primal and elemental things of life. Not till the primal needs are

satisfied does the work of the poet and artist begin—“After the banquet,

the minstrel.”

The poet and the artist too often live, like the Lady of Shalott,

weaving a magic web of fair and rich colour, but dealing not with life

itself, and not even with life viewed _ipsis oculis_, but in the magic

mirror. The Lady of Shalott is doubly secluded from the world; she does

not mingle with it, she does not even see it; so the writer sometimes

does not even see the life which he describes, but draws his knowledge

secondhand, through books and bookish secluded talk. I do not think that

I under-rate the artistic vocation; but it is only one of many, and,

though different in kind, certainly not superior to the vocations of

those who do the practical work of the world.

From this dangerous heresy I was saved just at the moment when it

was waiting to seize upon me, and at a time when a man’s convictions

are apt to settle themselves for life, by contact with the prosaic,

straightforward and commonplace world.

The House of Quiet: An Autobiography · 第 3 / 11 段