FOOTNOTE:

[1] So written, with a medial _mem_ ([Hebrew: mem]) instead of the

final ([Hebrew: mem]).

GFRORER, AUGUST FRIEDRICH (1803-1861), German historian, was born at

Calw, Wurttemberg, on the 5th of March 1803, and at the close of his

preliminary studies at the seminary of Blaubeuren entered the university

of Tubingen in 1821 as a student of evangelical theology. After passing

his final examinations in 1825, he spent a year in Switzerland, during

part of the time acting as companion and secretary to C. von Bonstetten

(1745-1832); the year 1827 was spent chiefly in Rome. Returning to

Wurttemberg in 1828, he first undertook the duties of repetent or

theological tutor in Tubingen, and afterwards accepted a curacy in

Stuttgart; but having in 1830 received an appointment in the royal

public library at Stuttgart, he thenceforth gave himself exclusively to

literature and historical science. His first work on Philo (_Philo u.

die judisch-alexandrinische Theosophie_, Stuttgart, 1831) was rapidly

followed by an elaborate biography, in two volumes, of Gustavus Adolphus

(_Gustav Adolf, Konig von Schweden, und seine Zeit_, Stuttgart,

1835-1837), and by a critical history of primitive Christianity

(_Kritische Geschichte des Urchristenthums_, 3 vols., Stuttgart, 1838).

Here Gfrorer had manifested opinions unfavourable to Protestantism,

which, however, were not openly avowed until fully developed in his

church history (_Allgemeine Kirchengeschichte bis Beginn des 14ten

Jahrhunderts_, Stuttgart, 1841-1846). In the autumn of 1846 he was

appointed to the chair of history in the university of Freiburg, where

he continued to teach until his death at Carlsbad on the 6th of July

1861. In 1848 he sat as a representative in the Frankfort parliament,

where he supported the "High German" party, and in 1853 he publicly went

over to the Church of Rome. He was a bitter opponent of Prussia and an

ardent controversialist.

Among his later historical works the most important is the _Geschichte

der ost- u. westfrankischen Karolinger_ (Freiburg, 1848); but those on

the pseudo-Isidorian Decretals (_Untersuchung uber Alter, Ursprung, u.

Werth der Decretalen des falschen Isidorus_, 1848), on the primitive

history of mankind (_Urgeschichte des menschlichen Geschlechts_,

1855), on Hildebrand (_Papst Gregorius VII. u. sein Zeitalter_, 7

vols., 1859-1861), on the history of the 18th century (_Geschichte des

18ten Jahrhunderts_, 1862-1873), on German popular rights (_Zur

Geschichte deutscher Volksrechte im Mittelalter_, Basel, 1865-1866)

and on Byzantine history (_Byzantinische Geschichten_, 1872-1874), are

also of real value.

GHADAMES, GADAMES or RHADAMES, a town in an oasis of the same name, in

that part of the Sahara which forms part of the Turkish vilayet of

Tripoli. It is about 300 m. S.W. of the city of Tripoli and some 10 m.

E. of the Algerian frontier. According to Gerhard Rohlfs, the last form

given to the word most correctly represents the Arabic pronunciation,

but the other forms are more often used in Europe. The streets of the

town are narrow and vaulted and have been likened to the bewildering

galleries of a coalpit. The roofs are laid out as gardens and preserved

for the exclusive use of the women. The Ghadamsi merchants have been

known for centuries as keen and adventurous traders, and their agents

are to be found in the more important places of the western and central

Sudan, such as Kano, Katsena, Kanem, Bornu, Timbuktu, as well as at Ghat

and Tripoli. Ghadames itself is the centre of a large number of caravan

routes, and in the early part of the 19th century about 30,000 laden

camels entered its markets every year. The caravan trade was created by

the Ghadamsi merchants who, aided by their superior intelligence,

capacity and honesty, long enjoyed a monopoly. In 1873 Tripolitan

merchants began to compete with them. In 1893 came the invasion of Bornu

by Rabah, and the total stoppage of this caravan route for nearly ten

years to the great detriment of the merchants of Ghadames. The caravans

from Kano were also frequently pillaged by the Tuareg, so that the

prosperity of the town declined. Later on, the opening of rapid means of

transport from Kano and other cities to the Gulf of Guinea also affected

Ghadames, which, however, maintains a considerable trade. The chief

articles brought by the caravans are ostrich feathers, skins and ivory

and one of the principal imports is tea. In 1845 the population was

estimated at 3000, of whom about 500 were slaves and strangers, and

upwards of 1200 children; in 1905 it amounted in round numbers to 7000.

The inhabitants are chiefly Berbers and Arabs. A Turkish garrison is

maintained in the town.

Before the Christian era Ghadames was a stronghold of the Garamantes

whose power was overthrown in the days of Augustus by L. Cornelius

Balbus Minor, who captured Ghadames (Cydamus). It is not unlikely that

Roman settlers may have been attracted to the spot by the presence of

the warm springs which still rise in the heart of the town, and spread

fertility in the surrounding gardens. In the 7th century Ghadames was

conquered by the Arabs. It appears afterwards to have fallen under the

power of the rulers of Tunisia, then to a native dynasty which reigned

at Tripoli, and in the 16th century it became part of the Turkish

vilayet of Tripoli. It has since then shared the political fortunes of

that country. In the first half of the 19th century it was visited by

several British explorers and later by German and French travellers.

See J. Richardson, _Travels in the Great Desert of Sahara in 1845-1846

... including a Description of ... Ghadames_ (London, 1848); G.

Rohlfs, _Reise durch Marokko ... und Reise durch die Grosse Wuste uber

Rhadames nach Tripoli_ (Bremen, 1868).

GHAT, or RHAT, an oasis and town, forming part of the Turkish vilayet of

Tripoli. Ghat is an important centre of the caravan trade between the

Nigerian states and the seaports of the Mediterranean (see TRIPOLI).

GHATS, or GHAUTS (literally "the Landing Stairs" from the sea, or

"Passes"), two ranges of mountains extending along the eastern and

western shores of the Indian peninsula. The word properly applies to the

passes through the mountains, but from an early date was transferred by

Europeans to the mountains themselves.

The Eastern Ghats run in fragmentary spurs and ranges down the Madras

coast. They begin in the Orissa district of Balasore, pass southwards

through Cuttack and Puri, enter the Madras presidency in Ganjam, and

sweep southwards through the districts of Vizagapatam, Godavari,

Nellore, Chingleput, South Arcot, Trichinopoly and Tinnevelly. They run

at a distance of 50 to 150 m. from the coast, except in Ganjam and

Vizagapatam, where in places they almost abut on the Bay of Bengal.

Their geological formation is granite, with gneiss and mica slate, with

clay slate, hornblende and primitive limestone overlying. The average

elevation is about 1500 ft., but several hills in Ganjam are between

4000 and 5000 ft. high. For the most part there is a broad expanse of

low land between their base and the sea, and their line is pierced by

the Godavari, Kistna and Cauvery rivers.

The Western Ghats (Sahyadri in Sanskrit) start from the south of the

Tapti valley, and run south through the districts of Khandesh, Nasik,

Thana, Satara, Ratnagiri, Kanara and Malabar, and the states of Cochin

and Travancore, meeting the Eastern Ghats at an angle near Cape Comorin.

The range of the Western Ghats extends uninterruptedly, with the

exception of a gap or valley 25 m. across, known as the Palghat gap,

through which runs the principal railway of the south of India. The

length of the range is 800 m. from the Tapti to the Palghat gap, and

south of this about 200 m. to the extreme south of the peninsula. In

many parts there is only a narrow strip of coast between the hills and

the sea; at one point they rise in magnificent precipices and headlands

out of the ocean. The average elevation is 3000 ft., precipitous on the

western side facing the sea, but with a more gradual slope on the east

to the plains below. The highest peaks in the northern section are

Kalsubai, 5427 ft.; Harischandragarh, 4691 ft.; and Mahabaleshwar, where

is the summer capital of the government of Bombay, 4700 ft. South of

Mahabaleshwar the elevation diminishes, but again increases, and attains

its maximum towards Coorg, where the highest peaks vary from 5500 to

7000 ft., and where the main range joins the interior Nilgiri hills.

South of the Palghat gap, the peaks of the Western Ghats rise as high as

8000 ft. The geological formation is trap in the northern and gneiss in

the southern section.

GHAZALI [Muhammad ibn Muhammad Abu Hamid al-Ghazali] (1058-1111),

Arabian philosopher and theologian, was born at Tus, and belonged to a

family of Ghazala (near Tus) distinguished for its knowledge of canon

law. Educated at first in Tus, then in Jorjan, and again in Tus, he went

to college at Nishapur, where he studied under Juwaini (known as the

Imam ul-Haramain) until 1085, when he visited the celebrated vizier

Nizam ul-Mulk, who appointed him to a professorship in his college at

Bagdad in 1091. Here he was engaged in writing against the Isma'ilites

(Assassins). After four years of this work he suddenly gave up his

chair, left home and family and gave himself to an ascetic life. This

was due to a growing scepticism, which caused him much mental unrest and

which gradually gave way to mysticism. Having secured his chair for his

brother he went to Damascus, Jerusalem, Hebron, Mecca, Medina and

Alexandria, studying, meditating and writing in these cities. In 1106 he

was tempted to go to the West, where the Moravid (Almoravid) reformation

was being led by Yusuf ibn Tashfin, with whom he had been in

correspondence earlier. Yusuf, however, died in this year, and Ghazali

abandoned his idea. At the wish of the sultan Malik Shah he again

undertook professorial work, this time in the college of Nizam ul-Mulk

at Nishapur, but returned soon after to Tus, where he died in December

1111.

Sixty-nine works are ascribed to Ghazali (cf. C. Brockelmann's _Gesch.

d. arabischen Litteratur_, i. 421-426, Weimar, 1898). The most

important of those which have been published are: a treatise on

eschatology called _Ad-durra ul-fakhira_ ("The precious pearl"), ed.

L. Gautier (Geneva, 1878); the great work, _Ihya ul-`Ulum_ ("Revival

of the sciences") (Bulaq, 1872; Cairo, 1889); see a commentary by

al-Murtada called the Ithaf, published in 13 vols. at Fez, 1885-1887,

and in 10 vols. at Cairo, 1893; the _Bidayat ul-Hidaya_ (Bulaq, 1870,

and often at Cairo); a compendium of ethics, _Mizan ul-`Amal_,

translated into Hebrew, ed. J. Goldenthal (Paris, 1839); a more

popular treatise on ethics, the _Kimiya us-Sa`ada_, published at

Lucknow, Bombay and Constantinople, ed. H. A. Homes as _The Alchemy of

Happiness_ (Albany, N.Y., 1873); the ethical work _O Child_, ed. by

Hammer-Purgstall in Arabic and German (Vienna, 1838); the _Destruction

of Philosophers_ (_Tahafut ul-Falasifa_) (Cairo, 1885, and Bombay,

1887). Of this work a French translation was begun by Carra de Vaux in

_Museon_, vol. xviii. (1899); the _Maqasid ul-Falasifa_, of which the

first part on logic was translated into Latin by Dom. Gundisalvi

(Venice, 1506), ed. with notes by G. Beer (Leiden, 1888); the _Kitab

ul-Munqid_, giving an account of the changes in his philosophical

ideas, ed. by F. A. Schmolders in his _Essai sur les ecoles

philosophiques chez les Arabes_ (Paris, 1842), also printed at

Constantinople, 1876, and translated into French by Barbier de Meynard

in the _Journal asiatique_ (1877, i. 1-93); answers to questions asked

of him ed. in Arabic and Hebrew, with German translation and notes by

H. Malter (Frankfort, 1896); Eng. trans., _Confessions of

al-Ghazzali_, by Claud Field (1909).

For Ghazali's life see McG. de Slane's translation of Ibn Khallikan,

ii. 621 ff.; R. Gosche's _Uber Ghazzali's Leben und Werke_ (Berlin,

1859); D. B. Macdonald's "Life of al-Ghazzali," in _Journal of

American Oriental Society_, vol. xx. (1899), and Carra de Vaux's

_Gazali_ (Paris, 1902); see ARABIAN PHILOSOPHY. (G. W. T.)

GHAZI (an Arabic word, from _ghaza_, to fight), the name given to

Mahommedans who have vowed to exterminate unbelievers by the sword. It

is also used as a title of honour, generally translated "the

Victorious," in the Ottoman empire for military officers of high rank,

who have distinguished themselves in the field against non-Moslem

enemies; thus it was conferred on Osman Pasha after his famous defence

of Plevna.

GHAZIABAD, a town of British India in Meerut district of the United

Provinces, 12 m. from Delhi and 28 m. from Meerut. Pop. (1901) 11,275.

The town was founded in 1740 by Ghazi-ud-din, son of Azaf Jah, first

nizam of the Deccan, and takes its name from its founder. It has

considerably risen in importance as the point of junction of the East

Indian, the North-Western and the Oudh & Rohilkhand railway systems. The

town has a trade in grain and hides.

GHAZIPUR, a town and district of British India, in the Benares division

of the United Provinces. The town stands on the left bank of the Ganges,

44 m. E. of Benares. It is the headquarters of the government opium

department, where all the opium from the United Provinces is collected

and manufactured under a monopoly. There are also scent distilleries,

using the produce of the rose-gardens in the vicinity. Lord Cornwallis,

governor-general of India, died at Ghazipur in 1805, and a domed

monument and marble statue (by Flaxman) are erected over his grave. Pop.

(1901) 39,429.

The district of Ghazipur has an area of 1389 sq. m. It forms part of the

great alluvial plain of the Ganges, which divides it into two unequal

portions. The northern subdivision lies between the Gumti and the

Gogra, whose confluences with the main stream mark its eastern and

western limits respectively. The southern tract is a much smaller strip

of country, enclosed between the Karamnasa and the great river itself.

There are no hills in the district. A few lakes are scattered here and

there, formed where the rivers have deserted their ancient channels. The

largest is that of Suraha, once a northern bend of the Ganges, but now

an almost isolated sheet of water, 5 m. long by about 4 broad. Ghazipur

is said to be one of the hottest and dampest districts in the United

Provinces. In 1901 the population was 913,818, showing a decrease of 11%

in the decade. Sugar refining is the chief industry, and provides the

principal article of export. The main line of the East Indian railway

traverses the southern portion of the district, with a branch to the

Ganges bank opposite Ghazipur town; the northern portion is served by

the Bengal & North-Western system.

GHAZNI, a famous city in Afghanistan, the seat of an extensive empire

under two medieval dynasties, and again of prominent interest in the

modern history of British India. Ghazni stands on the high tableland of

central Afghanistan, in 68 deg. 18' E. long., 33 deg. 44' N. lat., at a

height of 7280 ft. above the sea, and on the direct road between

Kandahar and Kabul, 221 m. by road N.E. from the former, and 92 m. S.W.

from the latter. A very considerable trade in fruit, wool, skins, &c.,

is carried on between Ghazni and India by the Povindah kafilas, which

yearly enter India in the late autumn and pass back again to the Afghan

highlands in the early spring. The Povindah merchants invariably make

use of the Gomal pass which leads to the British frontier at Dera Ismail

Khan. The opening up of this pass and the British occupation of Wana, by

offering protection to the merchants from Waziri blackmailing, largely

increased the traffic.

Ghazni, as it now exists, is a place in decay, and probably does not

contain more than 4000 inhabitants. It stands at the base of the

terminal spur of a ridge of hills, an offshoot from the Gul-Koh, which

forms the watershed between the Arghandab and Tarnak rivers. The castle

stands at the northern angle of the town next the hills, and is about

150 ft. above the plain. The town walls stand on an elevation, partly

artificial, and form an irregular square, close on a mile in circuit

(including the castle), the walls being partly of stone or brick laid in

mud, and partly of clay built in courses. They are flanked by numerous

towers. There are three gates. The town consists of dirty and very

irregular streets of houses several stories high, but with two

straighter streets of more pretension, crossing near the middle of the

town. Of the strategical importance of Ghazni there can hardly be a

question. The view to the south is extensive, and the plain in the

direction of Kandahar stretches to the horizon. It is bare except in the

vicinity of the river, where villages and gardens are tolerably

numerous. Abundant crops of wheat and barley are grown, as well as of

madder, besides minor products. The climate is notoriously cold,--snow

lying 2 or 3 ft. deep for about three months, and tradition speaks of

the city as having been more than once overwhelmed by snowdrift. Fuel is

scarce, consisting chiefly of prickly shrubs. In summer the heat is not

like that of Kandahar or Kabul, but the radiation from the bare heights

renders the nights oppressive, and constant dust-storms occur. It is

evident that the present restricted walls cannot have contained the

vaunted city of Mahmud. Probably the existing site formed the citadel

only of his city. The remarks of Ibn Batuta (c. 1332) already suggest

the present state of things, viz. a small town occupied, a large space

of ruin; for a considerable area to the N.E. is covered with ruins, or

rather with a vast extent of shapeless mounds, which are pointed out as

Old Ghazni. The only remains retaining architectural character are two

remarkable towers rising to the height of about 140 ft., and some 400

yds. apart from each other. They are similar, but whether identical, in

design, is not clearly recorded. They belong, on a smaller and far less

elaborate scale, to the same class as the Kutb Minar at Delhi (q.v.).

Arabic inscriptions in Cufic characters show the most northerly to have

been the work of Mahmud himself, the other that of his son Masa'ud. On

the Kabul road, a mile beyond the Minaret of Mahmud, is a village called

Rauzah ("the Garden," a term often applied to garden-mausoleums). Here,

in a poor garden, stands the tomb of the famous conqueror. It is a prism

of white marble standing on a plinth of the same, and bearing a Cufic

inscription praying the mercy of God on the most noble Amir, the great

king, the lord of church and state, Abul Kasim Mahmud, son of

Sabuktagin. The tomb stands in a rude chamber, covered with a dome of

clay, and hung with old shawls, ostrich eggs, tiger-skins and so forth.

The village stands among luxuriant gardens and orchards, watered by a

copious aqueduct. Sultan Baber celebrates the excellence of the grapes

of Rauzah.

There are many holy shrines about Ghazni surrounded by orchards and

vineyards. Baber speaks of them, and tells how he detected and put a

stop to the imposture of a pretended miracle at one of them. These

sanctuaries make Ghazni a place of Moslem pilgrimage, and it is said

that at Constantinople much respect is paid to those who have worshipped

at the tomb of the great Ghazi. To test the genuineness of the boast,

professed pilgrims are called on to describe the chief _notabilia_ of

the place, and are expected to name all those detailed in certain

current Persian verses.

_History._--The city is not mentioned by any narrator of Alexander's

expedition, nor by any ancient author so as to admit of positive

recognition. But it is very possibly the _Gazaca_ which Ptolemy places

among the _Paropamisadae_, and this may not be inconsistent with Sir H.

Rawlinson's identification of it with _Gazos_, an Indian city spoken of

by two obscure Greek poets as an impregnable place of war. The name is

probably connected with the Persian and Sanskrit _ganj_ and _ganja_, a

treasury (whence the Greek and Latin _Gaza_). We seem to have positive

evidence of the existence of the city before the Mahommedan times (644)

in the travels of the Chinese pilgrim, Hsuan Tsang, who speaks of

_Ho-si-na_ (i.e. probably _Ghazni_) as one of the capitals of _Tsaukuta_

or Arachosia, a place of great strength. In early Mahommedan times the

country adjoining Ghazni was called _Zabul_. When the Mahommedans first

invaded that region Ghazni was a wealthy entrepot of the Indian trade.

Of the extent of this trade some idea is given by Ibn Haukal, who states

that at Kabul, then a mart of the same trade, there was sold yearly

indigo to the value of two million dinars (L1,000,000). The enterprise

of Islam underwent several ebbs and flows over this region. The

provinces on the Helmund and about Ghazni were invaded as early as the

caliphate of Moaiya (662-680). The arms of Yaqub b. Laith swept over

Kabul and Arachosia (Al-Rukhaj) about 871, and the people of the latter

country were forcibly converted. Though the Hindu dynasty of Kabul held

a part of the valley of Kabul river till the time of Mahmud, it is

probably to the period just mentioned that we must refer the permanent

Mahommedan occupation of Ghazni. Indeed, the building of the fort and

city is ascribed by a Mahommedan historian to Amr b. Laith, the brother

and successor of Ya`kub (d. 901), though the facts already stated

discredit this. In the latter part of the 9th century the family of the

Samanid, sprung from Samarkand, reigned in splendour at Bokhara.

Alptagin, originally a Turkish slave, and high in the service of the

dynasty, about the middle of the 10th century, losing the favour of the

court, wrested Ghazni from its chief (who is styled Abu Bakr Lawik, wali

of Ghazni), and established himself there. His government was recognized

from Bokhara, and held till his death. In 977 another Turk slave,

Sabuktagin, who had married the daughter of his master Alptagin,

obtained rule in Ghazni. He made himself lord of nearly all the present

territory of Afghanistan and of the Punjab. In 997 Mahmud, son of

Sabuktagin, succeeded to the government, and with his name Ghazni and

the Ghaznevid dynasty have become perpetually associated. Issuing forth

year after year from that capital, Mahmud (q.v.) carried fully seventeen

expeditions of devastation through northern India and Gujarat, as well

as others to the north and west. From the borders of Kurdistan to

Samarkand, from the Caspian to the Ganges, his authority was

acknowledged. The wealth brought back to Ghazni was enormous, and

contemporary historians give glowing descriptions of the magnificence of

the capital, as well as of the conqueror's munificent support of

literature. Mahmud died in 1030, and some fourteen kings of his house

came after him; but though there was some revival of importance under

Ibrahim (1059-1099), the empire never reached anything like the same

splendour and power. It was overshadowed by the Seljuks of Persia, and

by the rising rivalry of Ghor (q.v.), the hostility of which it had

repeatedly provoked. Bahram Shah (1118-1152) put to death Kutbuddin, one

of the princes of Ghor, called king of the Jibal or Hill country, who

had withdrawn to Ghazni. This prince's brother, Saifuddin Suri, came to

take vengeance, and drove out Bahram. But the latter recapturing the

place (1149) paraded Saifuddin and his vizier ignominiously about the

city, and then hanged them on the bridge. Ala-uddin of Ghor, younger

brother of the two slain princes, then gathered a great host, and came

against Bahram, who met him on the Helmund. The Ghori prince, after

repeated victories, stormed Ghazni, and gave it over to fire and sword.

The dead kings of the house of Mahmud, except the conqueror himself and

two others, were torn from their graves and burnt, whilst the bodies of

the princes of Ghor were solemnly disinterred and carried to the distant

tombs of their ancestors. It seems certain that Ghazni never recovered

the splendour that perished then (1152). Ala-uddin, who from this deed

became known in history as _Jah[=an]-soz_ (_Brulemonde_), returned to

Ghor, and Bahram reoccupied Ghazni; he died in 1157. In the time of his

son Khusru Shah, Ghazni was taken by the Turkish tribes called Ghuzz

(generally believed to have been what are now called Turkomans). The

king fled to Lahore, and the dynasty ended with his son. In 1173 the

Ghuzz were expelled by Ghiyasuddin sultan of Ghor (nephew of Ala-uddin

Jahansoz), who made Ghazni over to his brother Muizuddin. This famous

prince, whom the later historians call Mahommed Ghori, shortly

afterwards (1174-1175) invaded India, taking Multan and Uchh. This was

the first of many successive inroads on western and northern India, in

one of which Lahore was wrested from Khusru Malik, the last of Mahmud's

house, who died a captive in the hills of Ghor. In 1192 Prithvi Rai or

Pithora (as the Moslem writers call him), the Chauhan king of Ajmere,

being defeated and slain near Thanewar, the whole country from the

Himalaya to Ajmere became subject to the Ghori king of Ghazni. On the

death of his brother Ghiyasuddin, with whose power he had been

constantly associated, and of whose conquests he had been the chief

instrument, Muizuddin became sole sovereign over Ghor and Ghazni, and

the latter place was then again for a brief period the seat of an empire

nearly as extensive as that of Mahmud the son of Sabuktagin. Muizuddin

crossed the Indus once more to put down a rebellion of the Khokhars in

the Punjab, and on his way back was murdered by a band of them, or, as

some say, by one of the _Mulahidah_ or Assassins. The slave lieutenants

of Muizuddin carried on the conquest of India, and as the rapidly

succeeding events broke their dependence on any master, they established

at Delhi that monarchy of which, after it had endured through many

dynasties, and had culminated with the Mogul house of Baber, the shadow

perished in 1857. The death of Muizuddin was followed by struggle and

anarchy, ending for a time in the annexation of Ghazni to the empire of

Khwarizm by Mahommed Shah, who conferred it on his famous son,

Jelaluddin, and Ghazni became the headquarters of the latter. After

Jenghiz Khan had extinguished the power of his family in Turkestan,

Jelaluddin defeated the army sent against him by the Mongol at Parwan,

north of Kabul. Jenghiz then advanced and drove Jelaluddin across the

Indus, after which he sent Ogdai his son to besiege Ghazni. Henceforward

Ghazni is much less prominent in Asiatic history. It continued subject

to the Mongols, sometimes to the house of Hulagu in Persia, and

sometimes to that of Jagatai in Turkestan. In 1326, after a battle

between Amir Hosain, the viceroy of the former house in Khorasan, and

Tarmashirin, the reigning khan of Jagatai, the former entered Ghazni and

once more subjected it to devastation, and this time the tomb of Mahmud

to desecration.

Ibn Batuta (c. 1332) says the greater part of the city was in ruins, and

only a small part continued to be a town. Timur seems never to have

visited Ghazni, but we find him in 1401 bestowing the government of

Kabul, Kandahar, and Ghazni on Pir Mahommed, the son of his son

Jahangir. In the end of the century it was still in the hands of a

descendant of Timur, Ulugh Beg Mirza, who was king of Kabul and Ghazni.

The illustrious nephew of this prince, Baber, got peaceful possession of

both cities in 1504, and has left notes on both in his own inimitable

Memoirs. His account of Ghazni indicates how far it had now fallen. "It

is," he says, "but a poor mean place, and I have always wondered how its

princes, who possessed also Hindustan and Khorasan, could have chosen

such a wretched country for the seat of their government, in preference

to Khorasan." He commends the fruit of its gardens, which still

contribute largely to the markets of Kabul. Ghazni remained in the hands

of Baber's descendants, reigning at Delhi and Agra, till the invasion of

Nadir Shah (1738), and became after Nadir's death a part of the new

kingdom of the Afghans under Ahmad Shah Durani. We know of but two

modern travellers who have recorded visits to the place previous to the

war of 1839. George Forster passed as a disguised traveller with a

qafila in 1783. "Its slender existence," he says, "is now maintained by

some Hindu families, who support a small traffic, and supply the wants

of the few Mahommedan residents." Vigne visited it in 1836, having

reached it from Multan with a caravan of Lohani merchants, travelling by

the Gomal pass. The historical name of Ghazni was brought back from the

dead, as it were, by the news of its capture by the British army under

Sir John Keane, 23rd July 1839. The siege artillery had been left behind

at Kandahar; escalade was judged impracticable; but the project of the

commanding engineer, Captain George Thomson, for blowing in the Kabul

gate with powder in bags, was adopted, and carried out successfully, at

the cost of 182 killed and wounded. Two years and a half later the

Afghan outbreak against the British occupation found Ghazni garrisoned

by a Bengal regiment of sepoys, but neither repaired nor provisioned.

They held out under great hardships from the 16th of December 1841 to

the 6th of March 1842, when they surrendered. In the autumn of the same

year General Nott, advancing from Kandahar upon Kabul, reoccupied

Ghazni, destroyed the defences of the castle and part of the town, and

carried away the famous gates of Somnath (q.v.).

GHEE (Hindustani _ghi_), a kind of clarified butter made in the East.

The best is prepared from butter of the milk of cows, the less esteemed

from that of buffaloes. The butter is melted over a slow fire, and set

aside to cool; the thick, opaque, whitish, and more fluid portion, or

ghee, representing the greater bulk of the butter, is then removed. The

less liquid residue, mixed with ground-nut oil, is sold as an inferior

kind of ghee. It may be obtained also by boiling butter over a clear

fire, skimming it the while, and, when all the water has evaporated,

straining it through a cloth. Ghee which is rancid or tainted, as is

often that of the Indian bazaars, is said to be rendered sweet by

boiling with leaves of the _Moringa pterygosperma_ or horse-radish tree.

In India ghee is one of the commonest articles of diet, and indeed

enters into the composition of everything eaten by the Brahmans. It is

also extensively used in Indian religious ceremonies, being offered as a

sacrifice to idols, which are at times bathed in it. Sanskrit treatises

on therapeutics describe ghee as cooling, emollient and stomachic, as

capable of increasing the mental powers, and of improving the voice and

personal appearance, and as useful in eye-diseases, tympanitis, painful

dyspepsia, wounds, ulcers and other affections. Old ghee is in special

repute among the Hindus as a medicinal agent, and its efficacy as an

external application is believed by them to increase with its age. Ghee

more than ten years old, the _purana ghrita_ of Sanskrit materia

medicas, has a strong odour and the colour of lac. Some specimens which

have been much longer preserved--and "clarified butter a hundred years

old is often heard of"--have an earthy look, and are quite dry and hard,

and nearly inodorous. Medicated ghee is made by warming ordinary ghee

to remove contained water, melting, after the addition of a little

turmeric juice, in a metal pan at a gentle heat, and then boiling with

the prepared drugs till all moisture is expelled, and straining through

a cloth.

GHEEL, or GEEL, a town of Belgium, about 30 m. E. of Antwerp and in the

same province. Pop. (1904) 14,087. It is remarkable on account of the

colony of insane persons which has existed there for many centuries. The

legend reads that in the year 600 Dymphna, an Irish princess, was

executed here by her father, and in consequence of certain miracles she

had effected she was canonized and made the patron saint of the insane.

The old Gothic church is dedicated to her, and in the choir is a shrine,

enclosing her relics, with fine panel paintings representing incidents

in her life by, probably, a contemporary of Memling. The colony of the

insane is established in the farms and houses round the little place

within a circumference of 30 m. and is said to have existed since the

13th century. This area is divided into four sections, each having a

doctor and a superintendent attached to it. The Gheel system is regarded

as the most humane method of dealing with the insane who have no

homicidal tendencies, as it keeps up as long as possible their interest

in life.

GHENT (Flem. _Gent_, Fr. _Gand_), the capital of East Flanders, Belgium,

at the junction of the Scheldt and the Lys (Ley). Pop. (1880) 131,431,

(1904) 162,482. The city is divided by the rivers (including the small

streams Lieve and Moere) and by canals, some navigable, into numerous

islands connected by over 200 bridges of various sorts. Within the

limits of the town, which is 6 m. in circumference, are many gardens,

meadows and promenades; and, though its characteristic lanes are gloomy

and narrow, there are also broad new streets and fine quays and docks.

The most conspicuous building in the city is the cathedral of St

Bavon[1] (Sint Baafs), the rich interior of which contrasts strongly

with its somewhat heavy exterior. Its crypt dates from 941, the choir

from 1274-1300, the Late Gothic choir chapels from the 15th century, and

the nave and transept from 1533-1554. Among the treasures of the church

is the famous "Worship of the Lamb" by Hubert and Jan van Eyck. Of the

original 12 panels, taken to France during the Revolutionary Wars, only

4 are now here, 6 being in the Berlin museum and two in that of

Brussels. Among the other 55 churches may be mentioned that of St

Nicholas, an Early Gothic building, the oldest church in date of

foundation in Ghent, and that of St Michael, completed in 1480, with an

unfinished tower. In the centre of the city stands the unfinished Belfry

(_Beffroi_), a square tower some 300 ft. high, built 1183-1339. If has a

cast-iron steeple (restored in 1854), on the top of which is a gold

dragon which, according to tradition, was brought from Constantinople

either by the Varangians or by the emperor Baldwin after the Latin

conquest. Close to it is the former Cloth-hall, a Gothic building of

1325. The hotel-de-ville consists of two distinct parts. The northern

facade, a magnificent example of Flamboyant Gothic, was erected between

1518 and 1533, restored in 1829 and again some fifty years later. The

eastern facade overlooking the market-place was built in 1595-1628, in

the Renaissance style, with three tiers of columns. It contains a

valuable collection of archives, from the 13th century onwards. On the

left bank of the Lys is the Oudeburg (s'Gravenstein, Chateau des

Contes), the former castle of the first counts of Flanders, dating from

1180 and now restored. The chateau of the later counts, in which the

emperor Charles V. was born, is commemorated only in the name of a

street, the Cours des Princes.

To the north of the Oudeburg, on the other side of the Lys, is the

Marche du Vendredi, the principal square of the city. This was the

centre of the life of the medieval city, the scene of all great public

functions, such as the homage of the burghers to the counts, and of the

auto-da-fes under the Spanish regime. In it stands a bronze statue of

Jacob van Artevelde, by Devigne-Quyo, erected in 1863. At a corner of

the square is a remarkable cannon, known as _Dulle Griete_ (Mad Meg), 19

ft. long and 11 ft. in circumference. It is ornamented with the arms of

Philip the Good, duke of Burgundy, and must have been cast between 1419

and 1467. On the Scheldt, near the Place Laurent, is the

Geerard-duivelsteen (chateau of Gerard the Devil), a 13th-century tower

formerly belonging to one of the patrician families, now restored and

used as the office of the provincial records. Of modern buildings may be

mentioned the University (1826), the Palais de Justice (1844), and the

new theatre (1848), all designed by Roelandt, and the Institut des

Sciences (1890) by A. Pauli. In the park on the site of the citadel

erected by Charles V. are some ruins of the ancient abbey of St Bavon

and of a 12th-century octagonal chapel dedicated to St Macharius. In the

park is also situated the Museum of Fine Arts, completed in 1902.

One of the most interesting institutions of Ghent is the great Beguinage

(Begynhof) which, originally established in 1234 by the Bruges gate, was

transferred in 1874 to the suburb of St Amandsberg. It constitutes a

little town of itself, surrounded by walls and a moat, and contains

numerous small houses, 18 convents and a church. It is occupied by some

700 Beguines, women devoted to good works (see BEGUINES). Near the

station is a second Beguinage with 400 inmates. In addition to these

there were in Ghent in 1901 fifty religious houses of various orders.

As a manufacturing centre Ghent, though not so conspicuous as it was in

the middle ages, is of considerable importance. The main industries are

cotton-spinning, flax-spinning, cotton-printing, tanning and sugar

refining; in addition to which there are iron and copper foundries,

machine-building works, breweries and factories of soap, paper, tobacco,

&c. As a trading centre the city is even more important. It has direct

communication with the sea by a ship-canal, greatly enlarged and

deepened since 1895, which connects the Grand Basin, stretching along

the north side of the city, with a spacious harbour excavated at

Terneuzen on the Scheldt, 21-1/2 m. to the north, thus making Ghent

practically a sea-port; while a second canal, from the Lys, connects the

city via Bruges with Ostende.

Among the educational establishments is the State University, founded by

King William I. of the Netherlands in 1816. With it are connected a

school of engineering, a school of arts and industries and the famous

library (about 300,000 printed volumes and 2000 MSS.) formerly belonging

to the city. In addition there are training schools for teachers, an

episcopal seminary, a conservatoire and an art academy with a fine

collection of pictures mainly taken from the religious houses of the

city on their suppression in 1795. The oldest Belgian newspaper, the

_Gazet van Gent_, was founded here in 1667.

_History._--The history of the city is closely associated with that of

the countship of Flanders (q.v.), of which it was the seat. It is

mentioned so early as the 7th century and in 868 Baldwin of the Iron

Arm, first count of Flanders, who had been entrusted by Charles the Bald

with the defence of the northern marches, built a castle here against

the Normans raiding up the Scheldt. This was captured in 949 by the

emperor Otto I. and was occupied by an imperial burgrave for some fifty

years, after which it was retaken by the counts of Flanders. Under their

protection, and favoured by its site, the city rapidly grew in wealth

and population, the zenith of its power and prosperity being reached

between the 13th and 15th centuries, when it was the emporium of the

trade of Germany and the Low Countries, the centre of a great cloth

industry, and could put some 20,000 armed citizens into the field. The

wealth of the burghers during this period was equalled by their

turbulent spirit of independence; feuds were frequent,--against the

rival city of Bruges, against the counts, or, within the city itself,

between the plebeian crafts and the patrician governing class. Of these

risings the most notable was that, in the earlier half of the 14th

century, against Louis de Crecy, count of Flanders, under the leadership

of Jacob van Artevelde (q.v.).

The earliest charter to the citizens of Ghent was that granted by Count

Philip of Flanders between 1169 and 1191. It did little more than

arrange for the administration of justice by nominated jurats

(_scabini_) under the count's _bailli_. Far more comprehensive was the

second charter, granted by Philip's widow Mathilda, after his death on

crusade in 1191, as the price paid for the faithfulness of the city to

her cause. The magistrates of the city were still nominated _scabini_

(fixed at thirteen), but their duties and rights were strictly defined

and the liberties of the citizens safe-guarded; the city, moreover,

received the right to fortify itself and even individuals within it to

fortify their houses. This charter was confirmed and extended by Count

Baldwin VIII. when he took over the city from Mathilda, an important new

provision being that general rules for the government of the city were

only to be made by arrangement between the count or his officials and

the common council of the citizens. The burghers thus attained to a very

considerable measure of self-government. A charter of 1212 of Count

Ferdinand (of Portugal) and his wife Johanna introduced a modified

system of election for the _scabini_; a further charter (1228) fixed the

executive at 39 members, including _scabini_ and members of the commune,

and ordained that the _bailli_ of the count and his _servientes_, like

the _podestas_ of Italian cities, were not to be natives of Ghent.

Thus far the constitution of the city had been wholly aristocratic; in

the 13th century the patricians seem to have been united into a gild

(_Commans-gulde_) from whose members the magistrates were chosen. By the

14th century, however, the democratic craft gilds, notably that of the

weavers, had asserted themselves; the citizens were divided for civic

and military purposes into three classes; the rich (i.e. those living on

capital), the weavers and the members of the 52 other gilds. In the

civic executive, as it existed to the time of Charles V., the deans of

the two lower classes sat with the _scabini_ and councillors.

The constitution and liberties of the city, which survived its

incorporation in Burgundy, were lost for a time as a result of the

unsuccessful rising against Duke Philip the Good (1450). The citizens,

however, retained their turbulent spirit. After the death of Mary of

Burgundy, who had resided in the city, they forced her husband, the

archduke Maximilian, to conclude the treaty of Arras (1482). They were

less fortunate in their opposition to Maximilian's son, the emperor

Charles V. In 1539 they refused, on the plea of their privileges, to

contribute to a general tax laid on Flanders, and when Charles's sister

Mary, the governess of the Netherlands, seized some merchants as bail

for the payment, they retaliated by driving out the nobles and the

adherents of Charles's government. The appearance of Charles himself,

however, with an overwhelming force quelled the disturbance; the

ringleaders were executed, and all the property and privileges of the

city were confiscated. In addition, a fine of 150,000 golden gulden was

levied on the city, and used to build the "Spanish Citadel" on the site

of what is now the public park.

In the long struggle of the Netherlands against Spain, Ghent took a

conspicuous part, and it was here that, on the 8th of November 1576, was

signed the instrument, known as the Pacification of Ghent, which

established the league against Spanish tyranny. In 1584, however, the

city had to surrender on onerous terms to the prince of Parma.

The horrors of war and of religious persecution, and the consequent

emigration or expulsion of its inhabitants, had wrecked the prosperity

of Ghent, the recovery of which was made impossible by the closing of

the Scheldt. The city was captured by the French in 1698, 1708 and 1745.

After 1714 it formed part of the Austrian Netherlands, and in 1794

became the capital of the French department of the Scheldt. In 1814 it

was incorporated in the kingdom of the United Netherlands, and it was

here that Louis XVIII. of France took refuge during the Hundred Days.

Here too was signed (December 24, 1814) the treaty of peace between

Great Britain and the United States of America. After 1815 Ghent was for

a time the centre of Catholic opposition to Dutch rule, as it is now

that of the Flemish movement in Belgium. During the 19th century its

prosperity rapidly increased. In 1866-1867, however, a serious outbreak

of cholera again threatened it with ruin; but improved sanitation, the

provision of a supply of pure water and the demolition of a mass of

houses unfit for habitation soon effected a radical cure.

See L. A. Warnkonig, _Flandrische Staats- und Rechtsgeschichte bis

1305_ (3 vols., Tubingen, 1835-1842), and Gueldorf, _Hist. de Gand_,

translated from Warnkonig, with corrections and additions (Brussels,

1846); F. de Potter, _Gent van den oudsten tijd tot heden_ (6 vols.,

Ghent, 1883-1891); Van Duyse, _Gand monumental et pittoresque_

(Brussels, 1886); de Vlaminck, _Les Origines de la ville de Gand_

(Brussels, 1891); _Annales Gandenses_, ed. G. Funck-Brentano (Paris,

1895); Vuylsteke, _Oorkondenboek der stad Gent_ (Ghent, 1900, &c.);

Karl Hegel, _Stadte und Gilden_ (Leipzig, 1891), vol. ii. p. 175,

where further authorities are cited. For a comprehensive bibliography,

including monographs and published documents, see Ulysse Chevalier,

_Repertoire des sources hist. Topo-bibliogr._, s.v. "Gand."

Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, "Germany" to "Gibson, William" Volume 11, Slice 8 · 第 15 / 18 题