"Well, supposing that you did not go, but that you had read books on

Italian Art, and made out a list of the pictures you wanted to see at each

great town--Florence, Venice, Rome, Siena--and knew about each painter,

his history, his style, and photographs of his works, and copied out under

each picture what good critics had said of it, or at least put a reference

to the book where it was mentioned (_e.g._ Kingsley's description of

Bellini's Doge; Browning on Fra Lippo Lippi's Coronation of the Virgin;

Ruskin's best descriptions); and if you looked out all the famous men of

each town, and knew their history, and what parts of the town were sacred

to them; if you studied the buildings of each town, looked up its

architecture, and tried to draw it from photographs and illustrations, and

then hunted out all the poetry and novels about each place, and drew out a

sketch of its history, marking where the local history of the town

dovetailed into larger European interests, and specially where it touched

England--I think, after this, you would enjoy meeting any one from Italy

almost as much as if you had been there, and you would not feel you had

read up for nothing. I should take a fresh country every year, and make

believe that you were going to it next summer, and that you were getting

ready to be 'Eyes,' and not 'No Eyes,' while there. You would have got the

spirit of the country by this, far more than ninety-nine out of a hundred

of those who go to it in the flesh. You are leaving school at eighteen,

and by the time you are five and twenty, _i.e._ before you are fully grown

up, you might have thus visited Italy, France, Germany, Spain, America,

India, which would make you a fairly cultivated person."

"But it is so hard to get books; I can read Ruskin while I am with you,

and when I am with Uncle Charles I could find some of the others I should

want, but I can't get hold of a course of reading at home."

"But if you have such a large peg as Italy on which to hang your reading,

you can always find something which bears on it--you can borrow an odd

book here and there, or pick up bits in a stray magazine; several of the

books you would want are cheap to buy, and, if you keep a list of them,

you will be surprised to find from what odd quarters they turn up. People

have a way of saying, 'Oh, do recommend me a book,' as if all subjects

were equally interesting, or rather uninteresting, and they borrow the

first that comes, reading it as a duty, quite regardless of the fact that

it does not belong to anything they have read before, or will read after;

but if they had made up their mind on a subject, the lending friend would

take far more interest, and probably hunt up something that bore on the

subject, while the reader would be more likely to get good."

"But if I begin Ruskin here, and then go home, where I may perhaps find an

Italian history, and then go for another visit and find something else, it

will all be so disjointed."

"Yes, it would be nicer if you could go on with art or architecture; but

your reading will not be so desultory as to be useless, if it is all

strung on the one thread of Italy, and then you can group it, as you go

along, in a commonplace book. I should take a large one, and divide it

among the towns I wanted to see, and then subdivide the pages given to,

_e.g._ Florence, under the heads of art, history, famous men,

architecture, poetry, novels, and, as I read anything on these subjects, I

should jot down the substance of it under the right heading, or if it was

a poem, just give the title and one or two of the best lines. And you

could keep up your French and German at the same time--suppose you read

_Corinne_ and the _Improvisator_, they would both help to keep you in an

Italian atmosphere."

"Yes, I could keep up my reading, but how about the grammar?"

"I should recommend you to take a very conversational novel and turn a

page of it into both French and German every week; this would keep up all

the rules of grammar, and, though you might make mistakes, you would gain

fluency in expressing yourself, which is much more needed than grammatical

accuracy if you go abroad, for a course of lessons will set you right

about the grammar at any time, but would not make you talk, if you had

allowed yourself to get tongue-tied by not practising translation from

English into French; and I should advise you to translate very freely, and

use the dictionary as little as possible; if you cannot remember the exact

rendering, twist the sentence and paraphrase it, till you can manage it,

simply to learn to express your thoughts easily. I should say an hour a

week of this would keep up both French and German."

"But you have said nothing of English History and Literature."

"I should be inclined to drop English History for the first year, because

you know so much more of that than of Foreign and Ancient History, but if

you like it I should take some one prominent reign--Elizabeth or Charles

I., or Anne or George III., and get to know all the chief people, read

their memoirs, and what they themselves wrote, so as to feel among friends

whenever you hear a name of that period mentioned--and read all essays,

etc. that you can find upon it. To keep your mind generally open, I should

make a chart of contemporary history and another of literature, taking one

century a month, and leaving plenty of space for adding things afterwards.

In Literature, I should take one of the Men of Letters every month, or one

of the Foreign Classics, and at the same time read any of the man's own

works that I could. Modern poets and novelists and essayists I should read

at odd times, _specially making it a matter of conscience never to open a

novel before luncheon_! I should read my poets not only promiscuously, as

the fancy took me, but compare their treatment of different subjects;

_e.g._, you might make yourself a private New Year's Eve service, of all

the poems on it you can find--Coleridge, Tennyson, and Elia's prose poem

on the same subject. Or you could make a Shepherd's Calendar for yourself,

and copy out under each month what poets have said about it, and its

flowers and features generally: or a Poet's Garden; collect all the bits

about flowers, and make a 'Poet's Corner' in your garden, admitting no

flower that cannot bring some poetry as its credential. It will make

country life far more enjoyable if you know your poets as Thomas

Holbrook, in 'Cranford,' knew Tennyson."

"I should like all that, Aunt Rachel; but you have not said anything that

sounds like stiff reading yet."

"No; and you ought to have something that will tax all your powers, as

well as this general cultivation, which will be all pleasant. I should

take some really stiff book, on Logic or Political Economy, or Butler's

'Analogy,' and after each morning's work make a careful analysis of the

argument, leaving one side of your MS. book blank, that you may put in

afterwards any illustrations or criticisms of your own, or others, that

may occur to you in the future. I should always keep a stiff book in hand

and treat it so, even if all other regularity and plan in my reading fell

through--it would be a backbone."

"But I shall have so much writing to do if I am to make a commonplace book

on each subject."

"It will make you slower, but much surer. I know a girl who writes a

review of every book she reads, giving extracts, and an abstract of the

argument and her own opinion of it. She finds it most useful, both as

practice in expressing her thoughts and for reference afterwards."

"But it would take so long."

"You would be well repaid, and you would not read any books in your time

for study which were not worth taking trouble with. In reading a book, I

should put a mark to everything that struck me, and at the end of a

chapter should look over the marked bits, and put a second mark to those

parts that seemed specially important, after I had mastered the drift of

the chapter. It would then be easy, when you had finished the book, to

write a review, for you would only look at the doubly marked bits."

"And am I to do no science?"

"I should vary your science with your opportunities, because you have no

strong turn for any one in particular. When you go to town in the winter

for that long visit you should get some cooking lessons, and before you go

you should get the books recommended by the South Kensington Cookery

School, and study the bookwork on the subject. When you go away in the

summer, you should take up geology, or botany, or whatever suits the place

you go to."

"But I shall only have smatterings of things at this rate!"

"Smatterings are very good things in their way, so long as you are not

misled into thinking them more than they are! They are the keys which will

enable you, in the future, to follow up the subject for which you may have

any special opportunities. They also prevent your being quite a dumb note

anywhere,--it is something to be able to listen intelligently! Besides, if

your mind is open on all sides, you will never find any one dull, for you

are almost certain to be able to gain information on some one of the

subjects you are interested in."

"I don't see how I can get all these things in, Aunt Rachel, for I shan't

have much time."

"I think you might manage two hours a day, and I should divide the week

thus: Monday and Friday I should give to Italy or any subject which you

meant to take as the staple of your reading; Tuesday take a science, and

Wednesday English literature; Thursday take a stiff book and half an hour

of French; Saturday take ancient history or mythology and half an hour of

German. I should write an essay every week at odd moments, if I were you,

for you ought to think things out for yourself as well as filling your

mind with other people's thoughts by reading, but you could work out your

essay in your head while walking or waiting for any one. I should also

advise you to make a list of every book you read after leaving school; you

will find it very interesting in after years, especially if you put a

short criticism on each."[2]

"But surely I had better do more than one subject in a day? I should get

tired of reading one book for two hours."

"You might vary your treatment of the subject. For instance, take notes

of the History of Italy for one hour, and look out descriptions of

pictures for another. In literature you could read about your author for

one hour, and read his works for the next. In your science, give half the

time to book-work, and the rest to practical work."

"But would it not be a more thorough change to go to a new subject?"

"So it would, but you may not be able to fit in two hours' reading with

your duty to your neighbour! On any day that you could honestly be only a

half-timer, you are far less likely to get careless, and to despair of

regularity, if you get a bit of your day's subject, than if you have to

leave one of your subjects entirely undone."

Even Aunt Rachel's good advice came to an end at last, as in course of

time did Urith's visit, and also the Midsummer term, after which she left

school with the best possible intentions, and announced them at home with

much dignity. But, far from being allowed to carry on her course of study,

it became a study with her two small brothers to prevent such morbid

fancies from taking effect. They won golden opinions from the servants

those holidays, who said that the young gentlemen had never been so little

trouble before. They suddenly became as full of "resources within

themselves" as Mrs. Elton herself, to the admiration of the whole family,

except of the unfortunate Urith, who might have unravelled the mystery,

since the cultivation of her domestic virtues by startling and unexpected

interruptions of her reading, occupied such of their spare time as was not

devoted to the mental exercise of devising new plans for her discomfiture

on the morrow.

But, happily for Urith, holidays are terminable, and when the boys left

she hoped to do great things. But visitors came to stay in the house,

special friends of her own, with strong theories as to the value of

co-operation in the matter of brushing their hair at night.

Midnight conversations did not conduce to work before breakfast or to much

energy after it. It was, therefore, with very mingled feelings that Urith

welcomed Aunt Rachel, her outside conscience, whose yearly visit was

usually an unmixed pleasure to her.

Having written much about her intentions at first starting, she was not

surprised when her aunt, on the first evening of her visit, settled

herself for a talk, and began--

"How is the reading going on? You were very sensible in saying that you

meant to begin at once on leaving school, so as not to get out of the

habit of work, and as you have now had three months I suppose you have

something to show for it?"

"Well, I thought I should have had, but, you see, the boys wouldn't let

me!"

"I don't see why you need have drawn the boys' attention to what you were

doing; but since they left--"

"The house has been full!"

"Yes, my dear, but as you generally do have visitors, your reading will

never flourish at this rate."

"Well, I couldn't neglect them."

"No; but they don't require entertaining before breakfast, do they?"

"No; but I was so sleepy."

"What time did you go to bed?"

"Well, I suppose I ought not to have stayed in Barbara's room, but Alice

had so many stories to tell us of her adventures that I did not leave them

till after twelve o'clock."

"As Alice is by no means tongue-tied in the daytime, her adventures might

have kept, and if you went to bed in proper time, you might get half an

hour before breakfast. But what do you do after breakfast?"

"Oh, then the flowers want doing, and mamma always wants some notes to be

answered, and then it is so fine that we go for a walk, and don't get back

till after luncheon, and then visitors come, and I must be there to talk

to them; and when it gets cool, people come in for tennis, and as to

reading after that, why, one barely gets time to dress for dinner, and in

the evening they like me to play to them, and papa wants the paper read

to him, and you know, Aunt Rachel, you always said home duties ought to

come first, so I don't see when a girl at home is to read!"

"I quite agree with you about home duties, my dear; but, though many

things have changed since my day, home duties must have changed most of

all, if they now include chattering till midnight, and taking a two hours'

walk in the morning, on days when you are likely to get three hours'

tennis in the afternoon, and being obliged to play in the last set, so

that you cannot even go and dress a quarter of an hour too soon! It seems

to me that you might get these home duties done by eleven o'clock, and

then get an hour, or an hour and a half, for steady reading, or, if not so

much as that, still visitors do not come directly after luncheon: in fact,

I noticed that you got through two volumes of that new novel before any

one came. Now, that time would have done equally well for history, and

even when the boys are at home, their suspicions would not be much aroused

if you went to wash your hands for luncheon a quarter of an hour too soon,

and the same in the evening before dinner."

"Yes, Aunt Rachel, it all seems very easy when I talk to you, and I feel

now as if I should carry out all you say, but I know a hundred little

things will come to make it very hard. I wish it were easier to carry out

one's good intentions."

"I do not wish it for you, my dear; you will be worth ten times more if

you have to exert strength of character, than if everything is done for

you; we ought to feel a little insulted if Fortune lets us live on too

easy terms, though I cannot say, after all, that you have very hard ones.

There now! I have given you quite enough advice to start several girls in

life. I will only add this: do not get flurried over your work, or insist

on doing it when time and strength will not permit; and, on the other

hand, do not be self-indulgent!"

"Like as a star

That maketh not haste,

That taketh not rest,

Be each one pursuing

His God-given hest."

[Footnote 2: See "Record of a Year's Reading." 6_d_. Mowbray.]

"Get up, M. le Comte!"

You have all been considering what qualities are most necessary in family

life and what qualities are most to be deprecated--you have, in short,

been considering Dr. Johnson's question as to what makes "a clubbable

person." I find, on comparing your suggestions, that there are

thirty-eight things to avoid in home life (which suggests complexity);

however, each of you was to confine her attention to three virtues and

three failings, so in giving you my own likes and dislikes, I will not

dwell on more than three.

I will not take manifest faults like irritability or selfishness--we all

strive against those, but I would suggest turns of mind that are often not

realized as faults:--

I.--_The Benevolent Despot_ who takes infinite trouble for your help or

pleasure, but insists on your enjoying yourself in _her_ way. (The young

very often do this to the old or to the invalid, quite forgetting that

one's own way loses none of its charm, even in age or illness!)

II.--Then there is the _Peter Grievous_ who cannot stand a word of

reproof; she is aggrieved or huffy or sulky in a minute--she thinks that

she has a delicate sense of justice, and that she does well to be angry;

she feels as if her mother took a curious and selfish enjoyment in finding

fault with her,--whereas the poor mother has to take her courage in both

hands before saying anything calculated to bring on those black looks.

III.--And then there is _The Snail_, always slow, generally late, and

frequently a martyr--she has to be spoken to so often that her case

usually develops into the Peter Grievous disease as well. For if a mother

speaks, let us say, six times--in the daughter's mind it ceases to be

reproof, and becomes Nagging. It never occurs to the daughter that she

sinned six times (or even shall we say eight or ten?); she feels that she

is being nagged at, and may therefore cease to attend, and may enjoy a

grievance into the bargain!

Now, I have slow friends who really suffer from a sense of their failing,

and who realize acutely what they make others suffer; they were not

trained at first to pull themselves together and to collect beforehand any

materials they were likely to want (as you can train yourselves by

settling in properly to do your preparation)--and they did not teach

themselves to start five minutes sooner instead of leaving things to the

last moment. (They think that the consequent family thundercloud is their

sad fate from their being of a slow constitution.) But if you have only

one horse and your neighbour two, and you are to dine at the same house,

it only means that you must order yours earlier. Do not start together and

then bewail your sad fate; nothing condemns you to be late except your own

bad management.

Especially be careful to be up early when you are going to early service

with your mother; it fidgets her to wait--she recalls all your many

previous sins of the same kind--and just when you both want to feel _at

one_, you start off together (rather, I should say, you overtake her),

both feeling very much _at two_. And yet you made an effort to go! and you

feel she ought to be pleased with you--do not spoil it by that fly in the

ointment of being late.

* * * * *

It seems to me that the Benevolent Despot, the Peter Grievous, and the

Martyred Snail, are people to avoid in choosing your family!

Now, the people to choose for your family party are, first, _the Reliable

Person_. I know one person who is a perfect tower of strength, she is full

of common sense: if you give her a commission she is sure to get the right

thing and to do it reasonably; she knows exactly what she paid, and she

tells you! If she undertakes to do a thing it is certain to be done in

good time; she does not wait till the very day the thing is wanted and

then find that it cannot be got.

Now, _you_ often let yourselves do a stupid thing, or a forgetful thing,

and then say, "Oh, I'm so sorry!" and feel as if you had wiped it out. Not

at all! You have lost one chance of growing into a reliable woman. In all

your life you will only have a certain limited number of chances, and

should use every one you have--to be reliable is worth all the genius in

the world for comfort to others, and _you can each win this crown_ if you

care to do so.

One other person I would choose if I were fated to have sisters, would be

the one who purrs when she is pleased. It takes all the colour and air out

of life when people gaze impassively at beautiful things, or hear lovely

things and never seem to have taken them in; or meet kindness and look as

if it was not there. You do not need to gush, but _do_ purr!

And thirdly I want a magnanimous nature;--one that takes slights and

neglects in a large-minded way, and does not believe people meant them

and, if they _did_, does not fret: one who is serene when little things go

wrong, and does not fuss or worry: one who accepts generously as well as

gives generously, and who is keenly alive to people's good points and good

intentions. Little petty motives and small spites and jealousy die away

in the light of a nature like that. It keeps the family atmosphere sweet

and wholesome.

* * * * *

Now, my lessons are generally about the things that can be carried out at

home, or else about the beliefs that underlie them. You know that my

ambition for you is that you should go out into the world and lead the

ordinary small social life, but that you should live it in a great way and

bring great beliefs to bear on it.

This is a special lesson--the last of all to some of you--the last in this

year to all of you.

How long have you been at school, each of you? How many times have we come

together here, and thought over together, point after point, the things

that really matter to us?

Week after week we are reminded by these talks to pull ourselves together,

first in one way, then in another, and I do believe we have all tried.

Have the suggestions _I_ made and the Resolutions _we_ made, soaked into

our lives and altered the stuff of which we are made? That is the

Responsibility for _me_ who speak and for _you_ who hear: "To him that

knoweth to do good and doeth it not, to him it is sin."

A Bible lesson written for you and dwelling on your special life and

dangers is a more pointed reminder to you than a general sermon, and when

you leave you will not get these reminders: one is hardly ever spoken to

religiously after being grown up. It is no one's business afterwards (as

it is mine now) to speak to you.

Therefore I want you always to keep some religious book on hand that is

likely to _speak_ to _you_. For instance, Bishop Wilkinson's books speak,

so do Dean Paget's and Law's "Serious Call," and "Christian Perfection."

Read a little of such a book every day, and a longer bit on Sunday. If you

only say your prayers and go to church, it is apt to become an outside

thing; you want stirring up!

When you go out into the world you may drift into the ways of each

household you are with for the time being; whereas I want you to have your

own definite religious life, an inner life of rules and duties: dress like

other people, but keep a hair shirt underneath, as the Saints did.

And when I talk about this and that piece of advice (advice which is often

worldly wisdom; for goodness and worldly wisdom are closely

allied),--always remember that I pre-suppose the life of prayer and rule

about which I so often speak--only _there_ can you gain strength to follow

such advice.

But now (pre-supposing the inner religious life--the effort after the

Practice of the Presence of God)--what shall I pick out as practical

advice for a closing lesson to those who are going into the world?

I.--Always _vote on the right side_ in conversation.

Very often the lower side, or the _un_religious side in talk (or in

doings, such as not going to Church) is the easier side to take. It seems

obtrusive to show what you feel to be right; and very often the one who

takes the religious side is narrow-minded and tiresome compared to the

others. Goodness is very often tiresome, and non-religion broad-minded and

amusing. (Gallio is often a most attractive person!) It takes courage then

to side with the tiresome one, instead of saying something rather clever.

In youth one has a great horror of belonging to the tiresome side.

Cleverness counts for so much, and it is hard in early life to put

goodness first! One does not realize the beauty of the strength and

principle shown by the tiresome people, and it takes real principle to

show one's colours in ordinary talk.

Stray Thoughts for Girls · 第 4 / 10 段