HOW THE UNITED STATES REPLIED

To this the Government of the United States replied on the 8th of May,

accepting, of course, the assurances given, but adding:

The Government of the United States feels it necessary to state that

it takes it for granted that the Imperial German Government does not

intend to imply that the maintenance of its newly announced policy

is in any way contingent upon the course or result of diplomatic

negotiations between the Government of the United States and any

other belligerent Government, notwithstanding the fact that certain

passages in the Imperial Government's note of the 4th instant might

appear to be susceptible to that construction. In order, however,

to avoid any possible misunderstanding, the Government of the United

States notifies the Imperial Government that it cannot for a moment

entertain, much less discuss, a suggestion that respect by German

naval authorities for the rights of citizens of the United States

upon the high seas should in any way or in the slightest degree be

made contingent upon the conduct of any other Government affecting

the rights of neutrals and non-combatants. Responsibility in such

matters is single, not joint; absolute, not relative.

To this note of the 8th of May the Imperial German Government made no

reply.

On the 31st of January, the Wednesday of the present week, the German

Ambassador handed to the Secretary of State, along with a formal note,

a memorandum which contains the following statement:

Why we are at war · 第 17 / 47 题