C. G. FERRIS.

_Sanford, Fla., March 11, 1885._

_EXCHANGES._

LIMITATION OF THE VISUAL FIELD OF THE WORKER HONEY-BEE’S OCELLI. BY THE

REV. J. L. ZABRISKIE.[9]--The honey-bee is a remarkably hairy insect. On

the head the hairs are dense, and of various lengths; and they cover

every part, even the compound eyes and the mandibles. The antennæ,

however, are apparently smooth, having only microscopic hairs; and a

path through the long hairs, from each ocellus, or simple eye, directly

outward,--to be described more fully presently,--is practically smooth.

The ocelli are so situated that when the bee is at rest and the face

vertical, they are directly on the top of the head, arranged as an

equilateral triangle, and one ocellus is directed to the front, one to

the right side, and one to the left[10].

Long, branching hairs on the crown of the head stand thick like a

miniature forest, so that an ocellus is scarcely discernible except from

a particular point of view; and then the observer remarks an opening

through the hairs--a cleared pathway, as it were, in such a forest--and

notes that the ocellus, looking like a glittering globe half immersed in

the substance of the head, lies at the inner end of the path. The

opening connected with the front ocellus expands forward from it like a

funnel, with an angle of about fifteen degrees. The side ocelli have

paths more narrow, but opening more vertically; so that the two together

command a field which, though hedged in anteriorly and posteriorly,

embraces, in a plane transverse, of course, to the axis of the insect’s

body, an arc of nearly one hundred and eighty degrees.

These paths through the hairs appear to me to be indications that the

ocelli are intended for distant vision, although the opinion that near

vision is their function is held by eminent opticians.

The ocelli are nearly hemispherical, and the diameter of each is about

fifteen times that of a facet of the compound eye. Such a form of lens

would, I will concede, indicate for these organs a short focus, and

hence, a fitness for near vision.

But if the ocelli are intended for near objects, it is difficult to

understand why they are surrounded by a growth of hair so dense as to

permit unobstructed vision only in a very narrow field, and why they are

so placed on the top of the head as to be debarred from seeing any

objects in the neighborhood of the mandibles and the proboscis, the

ability to see which objects would appear to be very necessary in the

constant and delicate labors of the worker honey-bee among the flowers.

Dr. Zabriskie exhibited the head of the worker honey-bee for the

purpose of illustrating the above remarks. At the conclusion of his

observations, he added: “Besides the worker honey-bee, I have brought

for exhibition the drone and the queen of the same species, and the

queen-cells; the queen of _Bombus Virginicus_, one of our native

humble-bees; the _Melissodes binotata_, male and female; the _Melissodes

pruinosa_, both sexes; the beautiful _Anthophora dispar_, male and

female of Tunis, Africa; and the celebrated little stingless bee of

Abyssinia, the _Trigona Beccarii_, which lives in immense colonies, and

stores large quantities of honey. The _Anthophora dispar_ has a very

long proboscis. The possession of such a proboscis by our own bees would

add millions of dollars annually to the wealth of the United States.”

_CANADIAN DEPARTMENT._

The American Apiculturist. Vol. III. No. 6, June 15, 1885 A Journal Devoted to Scientific and Practical Beekeeping · 第 24 / 35 题