IV

I fear we are not getting on much with the joyousness of winter. In

order to be exhilarating it must be real winter. I have noticed that

the lower the thermometer sinks the more fiercely the north wind

rages, and the deeper the snow is, the higher rise the spirits of the

community. The activity of the "elements" has a great effect upon

country folk especially; and it is a more wholesome excitement than

that caused by a great conflagration. The abatement of a snow-storm

that grows to exceptional magnitude is regretted, for there is always

the half-hope that this will be, since it has gone so far, the

largest fall of snow ever known in the region, burying out of sight

the great fall of 1808, the account of which is circumstantially and

aggravatingly thrown in our way annually upon the least provocation.

We all know how it reads: "Some said it began at daylight, others

that it set in after sunrise; but all agree that by eight o'clock

Friday morning it was snowing in heavy masses that darkened the air."

The morning after we settled the five--or is it seven?--points of

Calvinism, there began a very hopeful snow-storm, one of those

wide-sweeping, careering storms that may not much affect the city,

but which strongly impress the country imagination with a sense of

the personal qualities of the weather,--power, persistency,

fierceness, and roaring exultation. Out-doors was terrible to those

who looked out of windows, and heard the raging wind, and saw the

commotion in all the high tree-tops and the writhing of the low

evergreens, and could not summon resolution to go forth and breast

and conquer the bluster. The sky was dark with snow, which was not

permitted to fall peacefully like a blessed mantle, as it sometimes

does, but was blown and rent and tossed like the split canvas of a

ship in a gale. The world was taken possession of by the demons of

the air, who had their will of it. There is a sort of fascination in

such a scene, equal to that of a tempest at sea, and without its

attendant haunting sense of peril; there is no fear that the house

will founder or dash against your neighbor's cottage, which is dimly

seen anchored across the field; at every thundering onset there is no

fear that the cook's galley will upset, or the screw break loose and

smash through the side, and we are not in momently expectation of the

tinkling of the little bell to "stop her." The snow rises in

drifting waves, and the naked trees bend like strained masts; but so

long as the window-blinds remain fast, and the chimney-tops do not

go, we preserve an equal mind. Nothing more serious can happen than

the failure of the butcher's and the grocer's carts, unless, indeed,

the little news-carrier should fail to board us with the world's

daily bulletin, or our next-door neighbor should be deterred from

coming to sit by the blazing, excited fire, and interchange the

trifling, harmless gossip of the day. The feeling of seclusion on

such a day is sweet, but the true friend who does brave the storm and

come is welcomed with a sort of enthusiasm that his arrival in

pleasant weather would never excite. The snow-bound in their Arctic

hulk are glad to see even a wandering Esquimau.

On such a day I recall the great snow-storms on the northern New

England hills, which lasted for a week with no cessation, with no

sunrise or sunset, and no observation at noon; and the sky all the

while dark with the driving snow, and the whole world full of the

noise of the rioting Boreal forces; until the roads were obliterated,

the fences covered, and the snow was piled solidly above the first-

story windows of the farmhouse on one side, and drifted before the

front door so high that egress could only be had by tunneling the

bank.

After such a battle and siege, when the wind fell and the sun

struggled out again, the pallid world lay subdued and tranquil, and

the scattered dwellings were not unlike wrecks stranded by the

tempest and half buried in sand. But when the blue sky again bent

over all, the wide expanse of snow sparkled like diamond-fields, and

the chimney signal-smokes could be seen, how beautiful was the

picture! Then began the stir abroad, and the efforts to open up

communication through roads, or fields, or wherever paths could be

broken, and the ways to the meeting-house first of all. Then from

every house and hamlet the men turned out with shovels, with the

patient, lumbering oxen yoked to the sleds, to break the roads,

driving into the deepest drifts, shoveling and shouting as if the

severe labor were a holiday frolic, the courage and the hilarity

rising with the difficulties encountered; and relief parties, meeting

at length in the midst of the wide white desolation, hailed each

other as chance explorers in new lands, and made the whole

country-side ring with the noise of their congratulations. There was

as much excitement and healthy stirring of the blood in it as in the

Fourth of July, and perhaps as much patriotism. The boy saw it in

dumb show from the distant, low farmhouse window, and wished he were

a man. At night there were great stories of achievement told by the

cavernous fireplace; great latitude was permitted in the estimation

of the size of particular drifts, but never any agreement was reached

as to the "depth on a level." I have observed since that people are

quite as apt to agree upon the marvelous and the exceptional as upon

simple facts.

V

By the firelight and the twilight, the Young Lady is finishing a

letter to Herbert,--writing it, literally, on her knees, transforming

thus the simple deed into an act of devotion. Mandeville says that

it is bad for her eyes, but the sight of it is worse for his eyes.

He begins to doubt the wisdom of reliance upon that worn apothegm

about absence conquering love.

Memory has the singular characteristic of recalling in a friend

absent, as in a journey long past, only that which is agreeable.

Mandeville begins to wish he were in New South Wales.

I did intend to insert here a letter of Herbert's to the Young Lady,

--obtained, I need not say, honorably, as private letters which get

into print always are,--not to gratify a vulgar curiosity, but

to show how the most unsentimental and cynical people are affected by

the master passion. But I cannot bring myself to do it. Even in the

interests of science one has no right to make an autopsy of two

loving hearts, especially when they are suffering under a late attack

of the one agreeable epidemic.

All the world loves a lover, but it laughs at him none the less in

his extravagances. He loses his accustomed reticence; he has

something of the martyr's willingness for publicity; he would even

like to show the sincerity of his devotion by some piece of open

heroism. Why should he conceal a discovery which has transformed the

world to him, a secret which explains all the mysteries of nature and

human-ity? He is in that ecstasy of mind which prompts those who

were never orators before to rise in an experience-meeting and pour

out a flood of feeling in the tritest language and the most

conventional terms. I am not sure that Herbert, while in this glow,

would be ashamed of his letter in print, but this is one of the cases

where chancery would step in and protect one from himself by his next

friend. This is really a delicate matter, and perhaps it is brutal

to allude to it at all.

In truth, the letter would hardly be interesting in print. Love has

a marvelous power of vivifying language and charging the simplest

words with the most tender meaning, of restoring to them the power

they had when first coined. They are words of fire to those two who

know their secret, but not to others. It is generally admitted that

the best love-letters would not make very good literature.

"Dearest," begins Herbert, in a burst of originality, felicitously

selecting a word whose exclusiveness shuts out all the world but one,

and which is a whole letter, poem, confession, and creed in one

breath. What a weight of meaning it has to carry! There may be

beauty and wit and grace and naturalness and even the splendor of

fortune elsewhere, but there is one woman in the world whose sweet

presence would be compensation for the loss of all else. It is not

to be reasoned about; he wants that one; it is her plume dancing down

the sunny street that sets his heart beating; he knows her form among

a thousand, and follows her; he longs to run after her carriage,

which the cruel coachman whirls out of his sight. It is marvelous to

him that all the world does not want her too, and he is in a panic

when he thinks of it. And what exquisite flattery is in that little

word addressed to her, and with what sweet and meek triumph she

repeats it to herself, with a feeling that is not altogether pity for

those who still stand and wait. To be chosen out of all the

available world--it is almost as much bliss as it is to choose. "All

that long, long stage-ride from Blim's to Portage I thought of you

every moment, and wondered what you were doing and how you were

looking just that moment, and I found the occupation so charming that

I was almost sorry when the journey was ended." Not much in that!

But I have no doubt the Young Lady read it over and over, and dwelt

also upon every moment, and found in it new proof of unshaken

constancy, and had in that and the like things in the letter a sense

of the sweetest communion. There is nothing in this letter that we

need dwell on it, but I am convinced that the mail does not carry any

other letters so valuable as this sort.

I suppose that the appearance of Herbert in this new light

unconsciously gave tone a little to the evening's talk; not that

anybody mentioned him, but Mandeville was evidently generalizing from

the qualities that make one person admired by another to those that

win the love of mankind.

MANDEVILLE. There seems to be something in some persons that wins

them liking, special or general, independent almost of what they do

or say.

THE MISTRESS. Why, everybody is liked by some one.

MANDEVILLE. I'm not sure of that. There are those who are

friendless, and would be if they had endless acquaintances. But, to

take the case away from ordinary examples, in which habit and a

thousand circumstances influence liking, what is it that determines

the world upon a personal regard for authors whom it has never seen?

THE FIRE-TENDER. Probably it is the spirit shown in their writings.

THE MISTRESS. More likely it is a sort of tradition; I don't believe

that the world has a feeling of personal regard for any author who

was not loved by those who knew him most intimately.

THE FIRE-TENDFR. Which comes to the same thing. The qualities, the

spirit, that got him the love of his acquaintances he put into his

books.

MANDEVILLE. That does n't seem to me sufficient. Shakespeare has

put everything into his plays and poems, swept the whole range of

human sympathies and passions, and at times is inspired by the

sweetest spirit that ever man had.

THE YOUNG LADY. No one has better interpreted love.

MANDEVILLE. Yet I apprehend that no person living has any personal

regard for Shakespeare, or that his personality affects many,--except

they stand in Stratford church and feel a sort of awe at the thought

that the bones of the greatest poet are so near them.

THE PARSON. I don't think the world cares personally for any mere

man or woman dead for centuries.

MANDEVILLE. But there is a difference. I think there is still

rather a warm feeling for Socrates the man, independent of what he

said, which is little known. Homer's works are certainly better

known, but no one cares personally for Homer any more than for any

other shade.

OUR NEXT DOOR. Why not go back to Moses? We've got the evening

before us for digging up people.

MANDEVILLE. Moses is a very good illustration. No name of antiquity

is better known, and yet I fancy he does not awaken the same kind of

popular liking that Socrates does.

OUR NEXT DOOR. Fudge! You just get up in any lecture assembly and

propose three cheers for Socrates, and see where you'll be.

Mandeville ought to be a missionary, and read Robert Browning to the

Fijis.

THE FIRE-TENDER. How do you account for the alleged personal regard

for Socrates?

THE PARSON. Because the world called Christian is still more than

half heathen.

MANDEVILLE. He was a plain man; his sympathies were with the people;

he had what is roughly known as "horse-sense," and he was homely.

Franklin and Abraham Lincoln belong to his class. They were all

philosophers of the shrewd sort, and they all had humor. It was

fortunate for Lincoln that, with his other qualities, he was homely.

That was the last touching recommendation to the popular heart.

THE MISTRESS. Do you remember that ugly brown-stone statue of St.

Antonio by the bridge in Sorrento? He must have been a coarse saint,

patron of pigs as he was, but I don't know any one anywhere, or the

homely stone image of one, so loved by the people.

OUR NEXT DOOR. Ugliness being trump, I wonder more people don't win.

Mandeville, why don't you get up a "centenary" of Socrates, and put

up his statue in the Central Park? It would make that one of Lincoln

in Union Square look beautiful.

THE PARSON. Oh, you'll see that some day, when they have a museum

there illustrating the "Science of Religion."

THE FIRE-TENDER. Doubtless, to go back to what we were talking of,

the world has a fondness for some authors, and thinks of them with an

affectionate and half-pitying familiarity; and it may be that this

grows out of something in their lives quite as much as anything in

their writings. There seems to be more disposition of personal

liking to Thackeray than to Dickens, now both are dead,--a result

that would hardly have been predicted when the world was crying over

Little Nell, or agreeing to hate Becky Sharp.

THE YOUNG LADY. What was that you were telling about Charles Lamb,

the other day, Mandeville? Is not the popular liking for him

somewhat independent of his writings?

MANDEVILLE. He is a striking example of an author who is loved.

Very likely the remembrance of his tribulations has still something

to do with the tenderness felt for him. He supported no dignity and

permitted a familiarity which indicated no self-appreciation of his

real rank in the world of letters. I have heard that his

acquaintances familiarly called him "Charley."

OUR NEXT DOOR. It's a relief to know that! Do you happen to know

what Socrates was called?

MANDEVILLE. I have seen people who knew Lamb very well. One of them

told me, as illustrating his want of dignity, that as he was going

home late one night through the nearly empty streets, he was met by a

roystering party who were making a night of it from tavern to tavern.

They fell upon Lamb, attracted by his odd figure and hesitating

manner, and, hoisting him on their shoulders, carried him off,

singing as they went. Lamb enjoyed the lark, and did not tell them

who he was. When they were tired of lugging him, they lifted him,

with much effort and difficulty, to the top of a high wall, and left

him there amid the broken bottles, utterly unable to get down. Lamb

remained there philosophically in the enjoyment of his novel

adventure, until a passing watchman rescued him from his ridiculous

situation.

THE FIRE-TENDER. How did the story get out?

MANDEVILLE. Oh, Lamb told all about it next morning; and when asked

afterwards why he did so, he replied that there was no fun in it

unless he told it.

The Complete Writings of Charles Dudley Warner — Volume 1 · 第 53 / 77 题