CHAPTER IV.

THE IRISH MYTHOLOGICAL CYCLE.

Three divine and heroic cycles of myths are known in Ireland, one

telling of the Tuatha Dé Danann, the others of Cúchulainn and of the

Fians. They are distinct in character and contents, but the gods of the

first cycle often help the heroes of the other groups, as the gods of

Greece and India assisted the heroes of the epics. We shall see that

some of the personages of these cycles may have been known in Gaul; they

are remembered in Wales, but, in the Highlands, where stories of

Cúchulainn and Fionn are still told, the Tuatha Dé Danann are less known

now than in 1567, when Bishop Carsewell lamented the love of the

Highlanders for "idle, turbulent, lying, worldly stories concerning the

Tuatha Dédanans."[153]

As the new Achæan religion in Greece and the Vedic sacred books of India

regarded the aboriginal gods and heroes as demons and goblins, so did

Christianity in Ireland sometimes speak of the older gods there. On the

other hand, it was mainly Christian scribes who changed the old

mythology into history, and made the gods and heroes kings. Doubtless

myths already existed, telling of the descent of rulers and people from

divinities, just as the Gauls spoke of their descent from Dispater, or

as the Incas of Peru, the Mikados of Japan, and the kings of Uganda

considered themselves offspring of the gods. This is a universal

practice, and made it the more easy for Christian chroniclers to

transmute myth into history. In Ireland, as elsewhere, myth doubtless

told of monstrous races inhabiting the land in earlier days, of the

strife of the aborigines and incomers, and of their gods, though the

aboriginal gods may in some cases have been identified with Celtic gods,

or worshipped in their own persons. Many mythical elements may therefore

be looked for in the euhemerised chronicles of ancient Ireland. But the

chroniclers themselves were but the continuers of a process which must

have been at work as soon as the influence of Christianity began to be

felt.[154] Their passion, however, was to show the descent of the Irish

and the older peoples from the old Biblical personages, a process dear

to the modern Anglo-Israelite, some of whose arguments are based on the

wild romancing of the chroniclers.

Various stories were told of the first peopling of Ireland. Banba, with

two other daughters of Cain, arrived with fifty women and three men,

only to die of the plague. Three fishermen next discovered Ireland, and

"of the island of Banba of Fair Women with hardihood they took

possession." Having gone to fetch their wives, they perished in the

deluge at Tuath Inba.[155] A more popular account was that of the coming

of Cessair, Noah's granddaughter, with her father, husband, a third man,

Ladru, "the first dead man of Erin," and fifty damsels. Her coming was

the result of the advice of a _laimh-dhia_, or "hand-god," but their

ship was wrecked, and all save her husband, Finntain, who survived for

centuries, perished in the flood.[156] Cessair's ship was less

serviceable than her grandparent's! Followed the race of Partholan, "no

wiser one than the other," who increased on the land until plague swept

them away, with the exception of Tuan mac Caraill, who after many

transformations, told the story of Ireland to S. Finnen centuries

after.[157] The survival of Finntain and Tuan, doubles of each other,

was an invention of the chroniclers, to explain the survival of the

history of colonists who had all perished. Keating, on the other hand,

rejecting the sole survivor theory as contradictory to Scripture,

suggests that "aerial demons," followers of the invaders, revealed all

to the chroniclers, unless indeed they found it engraved with "an iron

pen and lead in the rocks."[158]

Two hundred years before Partholan's coming, the Fomorians had

arrived,[159] and they and their chief Cichol Gricenchos fought

Partholan at Mag Itha, where they were defeated. Cichol was footless,

and some of his host had but one arm and one leg.[160] They were demons,

according to the chroniclers, and descendants of the luckless Ham.

Nennius makes Partholan and his men the first Scots who came from Spain

to Ireland. The next arrivals were the people of Nemed who returned to

Spain, whence they came (Nennius), or died to a man (Tuan). They also

were descendants of the inevitable Noah, and their sojourn in Ireland

was much disturbed by the Fomorians who had recovered from their defeat,

and finally overpowered the Nemedians after the death of Nemed.[161]

From Tory Island the Fomorians ruled Ireland, and forced the Nemedians

to pay them annually on the eve of Samhain (Nov. 1st) two-thirds of

their corn and milk and of the children born during the year. If the

Fomorians are gods of darkness, or, preferably, aboriginal deities, the

tribute must be explained as a dim memory of sacrifice offered at the

beginning of winter when the powers of darkness and blight are in the

ascendant. The Fomorians had a tower of glass in Tory Island. This was

one day seen by the Milesians, to whom appeared on its battlements what

seemed to be men. A year after they attacked the tower and were

overwhelmed in the sea.[162] From the survivors of a previously wrecked

vessel of their fleet are descended the Irish. Another version makes the

Nemedians the assailants. Thirty of them survived their defeat, some of

them going to Scotland or Man (the Britons), some to Greece (to return

as the Firbolgs), some to the north, where they learned magic and

returned as the Tuatha Dé Danann.[163] The Firbolgs, "men of bags,"

resenting their ignominious treatment by the Greeks, escaped to Ireland.

They included the Firbolgs proper, the Fir-Domnann, and the

Galioin.[164] The Fomorians are called their gods, and this, with the

contemptuous epithets bestowed on them, may point to the fact that the

Firbolgs were the pre-Celtic folk of Ireland and the Fomorians their

divinities, hostile to the gods of the Celts or regarded as dark

deities. The Firbolgs are vassals of Ailill and Medb, and with the Fir

Domnann and Galioin are hostile to Cúchulainn and his men,[165] just as

Fomorians were to the Tuatha Dé Danann. The strifes of races and of

their gods are inextricably confused.

The Tuatha Dé Danann arrived from heaven--an idea in keeping with their

character as beneficent gods, but later legend told how they came from

the north. They reached Ireland on Beltane, shrouded in a magic mist,

and finally, after one or, in other accounts, two battles, defeated the

Firbolgs and Fomorians at Magtured. The older story of one battle may be

regarded as a euhemerised account of the seeming conflict of nature

powers.[166] The first battle is described in a fifteenth to sixteenth

century MS.,[167] and is referred to in a fifteenth century account of

the second battle, full of archaic reminiscences, and composed from

various earlier documents.[168] The Firbolgs, defeated in the first

battle, join the Fomorians, after great losses. Meanwhile Nuada, leader

of the Tuatha Dé Danann, lost his hand, and as no king with a blemish

could sit on the throne, the crown was given to Bres, son of the

Fomorian Elatha and his sister Eri, a woman of the Tuatha Dé Danann. One

day Eri espied a silver boat speeding to her across the sea. From it

stepped forth a magnificent hero, and without delay the pair, like the

lovers in Theocritus, "rejoiced in their wedlock." The hero, Elatha,

foretold the birth of Eri's son, so beautiful that he would be a

standard by which to try all beautiful things. He gave her his ring, but

she was to part with it only to one whose finger it should fit. This was

her child Bres, and by this token he was later, as an exile, recognised

by his father, and obtained his help against the Tuatha Dé Danann. Like

other wonderful children, Bres grew twice as quickly as any other child

until he was seven.[169] Though Elatha and Eri are brother and sister,

she is among the Tuatha Dé Danann.[170] There is the usual inconsistency

of myth here and in other accounts of Fomorian and Tuatha Dé Danann

unions. The latter had just landed, but already had united in marriage

with the Fomorians. This inconsistency escaped the chroniclers, but it

points to the fact that both were divine not human, and that, though in

conflict, they united in marriage as members of hostile tribes often do.

The second battle took place twenty-seven years after the first, on

Samhain. It was fought like the first on the plain of Mag-tured, though

later accounts made one battle take place at Mag-tured in Mayo, the

other at Mag-tured in Sligo.[171] Inconsistently, the conquering Tuatha

Dé Danann in the interval, while Bres is their king, must pay tribute

imposed by the Fomorians. Obviously in older accounts this tribute must

have been imposed before the first battle and have been its cause. But

why should gods, like the Tuatha Dé Danann, ever have been in

subjection? This remains to be seen, but the answer probably lies in

parallel myths of the subjection or death of divinities like Ishtar,

Adonis, Persephone, and Osiris. Bres having exacted a tribute of the

milk of all hornless dun cows, the cows of Ireland were passed through

fire and smeared with ashes--a myth based perhaps on the Beltane fire

ritual.[172] The avaricious Bres was satirised, and "nought but decay

was on him from that hour,"[173] and when Nuada, having recovered,

claimed the throne, he went to collect an army of the Fomorians, who

assembled against the Tuatha Dé Danann. In the battle Indech wounded

Ogma, and Balor slew Nuada, but was mortally wounded by Lug. Thereupon

the Fomorians fled to their own region.

The Tuatha Dé Danann remained masters of Ireland until the coming of the

Milesians, so named from an eponymous Mile, son of Bile. Ith, having

been sent to reconnoitre, was slain, and the Milesians now invaded

Ireland in force. In spite of a mist raised by the Druids, they landed,

and, having met the three princes who slew Ith, demanded instant battle

or surrender of the land. The princes agreed to abide by the decision of

the Milesian poet Amairgen, who bade his friends re-embark and retire

for the distance of nine waves. If they could then effect a landing,

Ireland was theirs. A magic storm was raised, which wrecked many of

their ships, but Amairgen recited verses, fragments, perhaps, of some

old ritual, and overcame the dangers. After their defeat the survivors

of the Tuatha Dé Danann retired into the hills to become a fairy folk,

and the Milesians (the Goidels or Scots) became ancestors of the Irish.

Throughout the long story of the conquests of Ireland there are many

reduplications, the same incidents being often ascribed to different

personages.[174] Different versions of similar occurrences, based on

older myths and traditions, may already have been in existence, and

ritual practices, dimly remembered, required explanation. In the hands

of the chroniclers, writing history with a purpose and combining their

information with little regard to consistency, all this was reduced to a

more or less connected narrative. At the hands of the prosaic

chroniclers divinity passed from the gods, though traces of it still

linger.

"Ye are gods, and, behold, ye shall die, and the waves be upon you at

last.

In the darkness of time, in the deeps of the years, in the changes of

things,

Ye shall sleep as a slain man sleeps, and the world shall forget you for

kings."

From the annalistic point of view the Fomorians are sea demons or

pirates, their name being derived from _muir_, "sea," while they are

descended along with other monstrous beings from them. Professor

Rh[^y]s, while connecting the name with Welsh _foawr_, "giant" (Gaelic

_famhair_), derives the name from _fo_, "under," and _muir_, and regards

them as submarine beings.[175] Dr. MacBain connected them with the

fierce powers of the western sea personified, like the _Muireartach_, a

kind of sea hag, of a Fionn ballad.[176] But this association of the

Fomorians with the ocean may be the result of a late folk-etymology,

which wrongly derived their name from _muir_. The Celtic experience of

the Lochlanners or Norsemen, with whom the Fomorians are

associated,[177] would aid the conception of them as sea-pirates of a

more or less demoniacal character. Dr. Stokes connects the second

syllable _mor_ with _mare_ in "nightmare," from _moro_, and regards them

as subterranean as well as submarine.[178] But the more probable

derivation is that of Zimmer and D'Arbois, from _fo_ and _morio_ (_mor_,

"great"),[179] which would thus agree with the tradition which regarded

them as giants. They were probably beneficent gods of the aborigines,

whom the Celtic conquerors regarded as generally evil, perhaps equating

them with the dark powers already known to them. They were still

remembered as gods, and are called "champions of the _síd_," like the

Tuatha Dé Danann.[180] Thus King Bres sought to save his life by

promising that the kine of Ireland would always be in milk, then that

the men of Ireland would reap every quarter, and finally by revealing

the lucky days for ploughing, sowing, and reaping.[181] Only an

autochthonous god could know this, and the story is suggestive of the

true nature of the Fomorians. The hostile character attributed to them

is seen from the fact that they destroyed corn, milk, and fruit. But in

Ireland, as elsewhere, this destructive power was deprecated by begging

them not to destroy "corn nor milk in Erin beyond their fair

tribute."[182] Tribute was also paid to them on Samhain, the time when

the powers of blight feared by men are in the ascendant. Again, the

kingdom of Balor, their chief, is still described as the kingdom of

cold.[183] But when we remember that a similar "tribute" was paid to

Cromm Cruaich, a god of fertility, and that after the conquest of the

Tuatha Dé Danann they also were regarded as hostile to agriculture,[184]

we realise that the Fomorians must have been aboriginal gods of

fertility whom the conquering Celts regarded as hostile to them and

their gods. Similarly, in folk-belief the beneficent corn-spirit has

sometimes a sinister and destructive aspect.[185] Thus the stories of

"tribute" would be distorted reminiscences of the ritual of gods of the

soil, differing little in character from that of the similar Celtic

divinities. What makes it certain that the Fomorians were aboriginal

gods is that they are found in Ireland before the coming of the early

colonist Partholan. They were the gods of the pre-Celtic folk--Firbolgs,

Fir Domnann, and Galioin[186]--all of them in Ireland before the Tuatha

Dé Danaan arrived, and all of them regarded as slaves, spoken of with

the utmost contempt. Another possibility, however, ought to be

considered. As the Celtic gods were local in character, and as groups of

tribes would frequently be hostile to other groups, the Fomorians may

have been local gods of a group at enmity with another group,

worshipping the Tuatha Dé Danaan.

The strife of Fomorians and Tuatha Dé Danann suggests the dualism of all

nature religions. Demons or giants or monsters strive with gods in

Hindu, Greek, and Teutonic mythology, and in Persia the primitive

dualism of beneficent and hurtful powers of nature became an ethical

dualism--the eternal opposition of good and evil. The sun is vanquished

by cloud and storm, but shines forth again in vigour. Vegetation dies,

but undergoes a yearly renewal. So in myth the immortal gods are wounded

and slain in strife. But we must not push too far the analogy of the

apparent strife of the elements and the wars of the gods. The one

suggested the other, especially where the gods were elemental powers.

But myth-making man easily developed the suggestion; gods were like men

and "could never get eneuch o' fechtin'." The Celts knew of divine

combats before their arrival in Ireland, and their own hostile powers

were easily assimilated to the hostile gods of the aborigines.

The principal Fomorians are described as kings. Elatha was son of Nét,

described by Cormac as "a battle god of the heathen Gael," i.e. he is

one of the Tuatha Dé Danann, and has as wives two war-goddesses, Badb

and Nemaind.[187] Thus he resembles the Fomorian Tethra whose wife is a

_badb_ or "battle-crow," preying on the slain.[188] Elatha's name,

connected with words meaning "knowledge," suggests that he was an

aboriginal culture-god.[189] In the genealogies, Fomorians and Tuatha Dé

Danann are inextricably mingled. Bres's temporary position as king of

the Tuatha Déa may reflect some myth of the occasional supremacy of the

powers of blight. Want and niggardliness characterise his reign, and

after his defeat a better state of things prevails. Bres's consort was

Brigit, and their son Ruadan, sent to spy on the Tuatha Dé Danann, was

slain. His mother's wailing for him was the first mourning wail ever

heard in Erin.[190] Another god, Indech, was son of Déa Domnu, a

Fomorian goddess of the deep, i.e. of the underworld and probably also

of fertility, who may hold a position among the Fomorians similar to

that of Danu among the Tuatha Dé Danann. Indech was slain by Ogma, who

himself died of wounds received from his adversary.

Balor had a consort Cethlenn, whose venom killed Dagda. His one eye had

become evil by contact with the poisonous fumes of a concoction which

his father's Druids were preparing. The eyelid required four men to

raise it, when his evil eye destroyed all on whom its glance fell. In

this way Balor would have slain Lug at Mag-tured, but the god at once

struck the eye with a sling-stone and slew him.[191] Balor, like the

Greek Medusa, is perhaps a personification of the evil eye, so much

feared by the Celts. Healthful influences and magical charms avert it;

hence Lug, a beneficent god, destroys Balor's maleficence.

Tethra, with Balor and Elatha, ruled over Erin at the coming of the

Tuatha Dé Danann. From a phrase used in the story of Connla's visit to

Elysium, "Thou art a hero of the men of Tethra," M. D'Arbois assumes

that Tethra was ruler of Elysium, which he makes one with the land of

the dead. The passage, however, bears a different interpretation, and

though a Fomorian, Tethra, a god of war, might be regarded as lord of

all warriors.[192] Elysium was not the land of the dead, and when M.

D'Arbois equates Tethra with Kronos, who after his defeat became ruler

of a land of dead heroes, the analogy, like other analogies with Greek

mythology, is misleading. He also equates Bres, as temporary king of the

Tuatha Dé Danann, with Kronos, king of heaven in the age of gold.

Kronos, again, slain by Zeus, is parallel to Balor slain by his grandson

Lug. Tethra, Bres, and Balor are thus separate fragments of one god

equivalent to Kronos.[193] Yet their personalities are quite distinct.

Each race works out its mythology for itself, and, while parallels are

inevitable, we should not allow these to override the actual myths as

they have come down to us.

Professor Rh[^y]s makes Bile, ancestor of the Milesians who came from

Spain, a Goidelic counterpart of the Gaulish Dispater, lord of the dead,

from whom the Gauls claimed descent. But Bile, neither a Fomorian nor of

the Tuatha Dé Danann, is an imaginary and shadowy creation. Bile is next

equated with a Brythonic Beli, assumed to be consort of Dôn, whose

family are equivalent to the Tuatha Dé Danann.[194] Beli was a mythic

king whose reign was a kind of golden age, and if he was father of Dôn's

children, which is doubtful, Bile would then be father of the Tuatha Dé

Danann. But he is ancestor of the Milesians, their opponents according

to the annalists. Beli is also equated with Elatha, and since Dôn,

reputed consort of Beli, was grandmother of Llew, equated with Irish

Lug, grandson of Balor, Balor is equivalent to Beli, whose name is

regarded by Professor Rh[^y]s as related etymologically to Balor's.[195]

Bile, Balor, and Elatha are thus Goidelic equivalents of the shadowy

Beli. But they also are quite distinct personalities, nor are they ever

hinted at as ancestral gods of the Celts, or gods of a gloomy

underworld. In Celtic belief the underworld was probably a fertile

region and a place of light, nor were its gods harmful and evil, as

Balor was.

On the whole, the Fomorians came to be regarded as the powers of nature

in its hostile aspect. They personified blight, winter, darkness, and

death, before which men trembled, yet were not wholly cast down, since

the immortal gods of growth and light, rulers of the bright other-world,

were on their side and fought against their enemies. Year by year the

gods suffered deadly harm, but returned as conquerors to renew the

struggle once more. Myth spoke of this as having happened once for all,

but it went on continuously.[196] Gods were immortal and only seemed to

die. The strife was represented in ritual, since men believe that they

can aid the gods by magic, rite, or prayer. Why, then, do hostile

Fomorians and Tuatha Dé Danann intermarry? This happens in all

mythologies, and it probably reflects, in the divine sphere, what takes

place among men. Hostile peoples carry off each the other's women, or

they have periods of friendliness and consequent intermarriage. Man

makes his gods in his own image, and the problem is best explained by

facts like these, exaggerated no doubt by the Irish annalists.

The Tuatha Dé Danann, in spite of their euhemerisation, are more than

human. In the north where they learned magic, they dwelt in four cities,

from each of which they brought a magical treasure--the stone of Fal,

which "roared under every king," Lug's unconquerable spear, Nuada's

irresistible sword, the Dagda's inexhaustible cauldron. But they are

more than wizards or Druids. They are re-born as mortals; they have a

divine world of their own, they interfere in and influence human

affairs. The euhemerists did not go far enough, and more than once their

divinity is practically acknowledged. When the Fian Caoilte and a woman

of the Tuatha Dé Danann appear before S. Patrick, he asks, "Why is she

youthful and beautiful, while you are old and wrinkled?" And Caoilte

replies, "She is of the Tuatha Dé Danann, who are unfading and whose

duration is perennial. I am of the sons of Milesius, that are perishable

and fade away."[197]

After their conversion, the Celts, sons of Milesius, thought that the

gods still existed in the hollow hills, their former dwellings and

sanctuaries, or in far-off islands, still caring for their former

worshippers. This tradition had its place with that which made them a

race of men conquered by the Milesians--the victory of Christianity over

paganism and its gods having been transmuted into a strife of races by

the euhemerists. The new faith, not the people, conquered the old gods.

The Tuatha Dé Danann became the _Daoine-sidhe_, a fairy folk, still

occasionally called by their old name, just as individual fairy kings or

queens bear the names of the ancient gods. The euhemerists gave the

Fomorians a monstrous and demoniac character, which they did not always

give to the Tuatha Dé Danann; in this continuing the old tradition that

Fomorians were hostile and the Tuatha Dé Danann beneficent and mild.

The mythological cycle is not a complete "body of divinity"; its

apparent completeness results from the chronological order of the

annalists. Fragments of other myths are found in the _Dindsenchas_;

others exist as romantic tales, and we have no reason to believe that

all the old myths have been preserved. But enough remains to show the

true nature of the Tuatha Dé Danann--their supernatural character, their

powers, their divine and unfailing food and drink, their mysterious and

beautiful abode. In their contents, their personages, in the actions

that are described in them, the materials of the "mythological cycle,"

show how widely it differs from the Cúchulainn and Fionn cycles.[198]

"The white radiance of eternity" suffuses it; the heroic cycles, magical

and romantic as they are, belong far more to earth and time.

FOOTNOTES:

[153] For some Highland references to the gods in saga and _Märchen_,

see _Book of the Dean of Lismore_, 10; Campbell, _WHT_ ii. 77. The

sea-god Lir is probably the Liur of Ossianic ballads (Campbell, _LF_

100, 125), and his son Manannan is perhaps "the Son of the Sea" in a

Gaelic song (Carmichael, _CG_ ii. 122). Manannan and his daughters are

also known (Campbell, _witchcraft_, 83).

[154] The euhemerising process is first seen in tenth century poems by

Eochaid hua Flainn, but was largely the work of Flainn Manistrech, _ob._

1056. It is found fully fledged in the _Book of Invasions_.

[155] Keating, 105-106.

[156] Keating, 107; _LL_ 4_b_. Cf. _RC_ xvi. 155.

[157] _LL_ 5.

[158] Keating, 111. Giraldus Cambrensis, _Hist. Irel._ c. 2, makes

Roanus survive and tell the tale of Partholan to S. Patrick. He is the

Caoilte mac Ronan of other tales, a survivor of the Fians, who held many

racy dialogues with the Saint. Keating abuses Giraldus for equating

Roanus with Finntain in his "lying history," and for calling him Roanus

instead of Ronanus, a mistake in which he, "the guide bull of the herd,"

is followed by others.

[159] Keating, 164.

[160] _LL_ 5_a_.

[161] Keating, 121; _LL_ 6_a_; _RC_ xvi. 161.

[162] Nennius, _Hist. Brit._ 13.

[163] _LL_ 6, 8_b_.

[164] _LL_ 6_b_, 127_a_; _IT_ iii. 381; _RC_ xvi. 81.

[165] _LL_ 9_b_, 11_a_.

[166] See Cormac, _s.v._ "Nescoit," _LU_ 51.

[167] _Harl. MSS._ 2, 17, pp. 90-99. Cf. fragment from _Book of

Invasions_ in _LL_ 8.

[168] _Harl. MS._ 5280, translated in _RC_ xii. 59 f.

[169] _RC_ xii. 60; D'Arbois, v. 405 f.

[170] For Celtic brother-sister unions see p. 224.

[171] O'Donovan, _Annals_, i. 16.

[172] _RC_ xv. 439.

[173] _RC_ xii. 71.

[174] Professor Rh[^y]s thinks the Partholan story is the aboriginal,

the median the Celtic version of the same event. Partholan, with initial

_p_ cannot be Goidelic (_Scottish Review_, 1890, "Myth. Treatment of

Celtic Ethnology").

[175] _HL_ 591.

[176] _CM_ ix. 130; Campbell _LF_ 68.

[177] _RC_ xii. 75.

[178] _US_ 211.

[179] D'Arbois, ii. 52; _RC_ xii. 476.

[180] _RC_ xii. 73.

[181] _RC_ xii. 105.

[182] _RC_ xxii. 195.

[183] Larmime, "Kian, son of Kontje."

[184] See p. 78; _LL_ 245_b_.

[185] Mannhardt, _Mythol. Forsch._ 310 f.

[186] "Fir Domnann," "men of Domna," a goddess (Rh[^y]s, _HL_ 597), or a

god (D'Arbois, ii. 130). "Domna" is connected with Irish-words meaning

"deep" (Windisch, _IT_ i. 498; Stokes, _US_ 153). Domna, or Domnu, may

therefore have been a goddess of the deep, not the sea so much as the

underworld, and so perhaps an Earth-mother from whom the Fir Domnann

traced their descent.

[187] Cormac, _s.v._ "Neith"; D'Arbois, v. 400; _RC_ xii. 61.

[188] _LU_ 50. Tethra is glossed _badb_ (_IT_ i. 820).

[189] _IT_ i. 521; Rh[^y]s, _HL_ 274 f.

[190] _RC_ xii. 95.

[191] _RC_ xii. 101.

[192] See p. 374.

[193] D'Arbois, ii. 198, 375.

[194] _HL_ 90-91.

[195] _HL_ 274, 319, 643. For Beli, see p. 112, _infra_.

[196] Whatever the signification of the battle of Mag-tured may be, the

place which it was localised is crowded with Neolithic megaliths,

dolmens, etc. To later fancy these were the graves of warriors slain in

a great battle fought there, and that battle became the fight between

Fomorians and Tuatha Dé Dananns. Mag-tured may have been the scene of a

battle between their respective worshippers.

[197] O'Grady, ii. 203.

[198] It should be observed that, as in the Vedas, the Odyssey, the

Japanese _Ko-ji-ki_, as well as in barbaric and savage mythologies,

_Märchen_ formulæ abound in the Irish mythological cycle.

The Religion of the Ancient Celts · 第 4 / 24 章