SURGICAL PRACTICE

Much has been made of the lower status held by the surgeon as compared

with that of the physician--during the seventeenth century. On the

continent and in England, at this period, membership in separate guilds

in part distinguished doctor and surgeon; in England, after 1540 and

until 1745, surgeons held common membership with barbers in one

corporate organization. In America, historians agree, the differences

based on specialization of practice between surgeons and physicians

soon tended to disappear, a superior education often being the only

attribute or function of a physician not shared by the surgeon. Barbers

held a unique position, but in performing phlebotomies, a minor

operation, they retained associations with health and disease. Both

barber and surgeon shared a certain expertness with tools, as they do

today.

Evidence abounds in the earlier records that the scarcity of medical

men may have compelled surgeons in Virginia to practice internal

medicine: surgeons prescribed medicine with the same frequency as

doctors. The surgeons, however, did not abandon the treatment of

wounds, fractures, and dislocations; notes on amputations during the

century also exist.

Nor is it reasonable to assume that the isolated physician of the

Virginia countryside would always insist upon referring a patient to a

surgeon. Dr. Francis Haddon, who had a large practice in York County,

Virginia, and who is not identified as a surgeon, left recorded the

course of treatment for an amputation--cordials, a purge, ointments,

and bloodletting--and a dismembering saw, as well.

Other recorded surgical treatments include care of dislocated

shoulders; wounds in various parts of the body; sores of the feet and

legs; cancerous ulcers in the instep; ulcers of the throat, and dueling

wounds. One of the most unusual surgical measures of the period was the

application of weapon salve for battle wounds; the salve was applied to

weapon, not wound.

Surgery has long been associated with the military, and much of the

outstanding surgical work done in Europe during the fifteenth and

sixteenth centuries was performed by military surgeons. Ambroise Pare

(c. 1510-1590), remembered especially for the use of the ligature in

amputations and the abandonment of the burning-oil treatment of wounds,

held a position as a surgeon for the French army. Other surgeons of the

period contributed to the improvement of medical practice by

enlightened measures of quarantine to prevent contagious diseases from

decimating armies.

Insomuch as the first settlers at Jamestown greatly feared attack from

Indians and Spaniards and because the initial landings had the

character of a military expedition, it is not surprising that the first

two medical men to arrive, Will Wilkinson and Thomas Wotton, were

surgeons. Captain John Smith on three occasions, it is to be

remembered, emphasized the importance of the surgeon to pioneer

settlers and explorers in the New World. When injured by the stingray

in 1608, Smith's first thought was of his need for a surgeon and

"chirurgery"; so the success of physician Russell's soothing oils came

as a pleasant surprise. On a subsequent expedition he included the

surgeon, Anthony Bagnall, rather than Dr. Russell, to treat the

stingray wound; and in 1609 when he received the powder burn, he left

Virginia "seeing there was neither chirurgeon nor chirurgery in the

fort to cure his hurt."

Throughout the century surgeons rendered services to colonists engaged

in fighting with, or defending themselves against, the Indians. When

the Indian massacre of 1622 occurred, costing the lives of more than

350 colonists in the settlements, it is possible that the two surgeons

who sailed to Virginia with Dr. Pott in 1621 gave assistance to the

wounded. In 1644, when a retaliatory attack on the Indians was made by

the settlers because of a recent massacre, the General Assembly

provided for a surgeon-general to accompany the militia, at public

expense.

Again, later in the century, the General Assembly gave evidence of

recognizing the importance of surgical care for soldiers when it voted

for supplying a surgeon with "a convenient supply of medicines &

salves, etc. to the value of five pounds sterling for every hundred

men" to each of eight forts planned to protect the settlements against

Indian attacks. Throughout the last half of the century references were

made to surgeons ministering to companies of soldiers or to various

garrisons and forts. Judging by the consistent employment of surgeons

for military duties, it would appear that the profession of surgeon

during the century was much more intimately associated with the

military than was that of physician. The relationship between the

surgeon and the military is similar to the early one between civil

engineer and the army in Europe.

Medicine in Virginia, 1607-1699 · 第 25 / 37 题