Chapter VI.

The Sermon Should Be Short.

The Discourses of the Fathers were short.

The French Mind is quick to apprehend.

Sermons are generally too long.

Sermons of Ten, Seven, and of Five Minutes.

"Long sermons bore us," [Footnote 16] says M. de Cormenin; "and

when a Frenchman is bored, he leaves the place and goes away. If

he cannot so retire, he remains and talks. If he cannot talk, he

yawns and falls asleep. Anyhow, he declares that he will not come

again. ..."

[Footnote 16: "_Nous ennuient._" It is useless to attempt

giving the full force of the French _ennui_ in any one

English word. That above adopted appears to me the nearest

approach to it which our language affords; still it comes far

short of the expressive original. Translator.]

The sermon should be short. At all events, it must not bore. Bore

or ennui is fatal in France, and is never pardoned. It has been

said, there are two things which are not permitted in France,

namely, to ridicule and to bore.

{184}

Unhappily the former is allowed nowadays, for there are many who

use it, and many who abuse it; but on the article of bore society

is still inflexible and implacable. The man who is deemed a bore

is shunned and detested. We, the clergy, must beware of exciting

this antipathy on the score of religion; the more so, because

most minds secrete a stock of the sentiment, which is readily

called forth when they are brought in contact with any thing

serious.

On the other hand, why preach so long? I know not how we have

allowed ourselves to be led into these lengthy discourses. What

is the good of it? What is the object? We speak in God's name.

Now, power and majesty are always chary of words; yet such words

are not the less efficacious for being few. The instructions of

our blessed Lord, who is the Divine Master of us all, were

uniformly short. Even the Sermon on the Mount, which has

revolutionized the world, does not appear to have lasted more

than half an hour. The homilies of the Fathers also were short,

and Saint Ambrose says:--"_Nec nimium prolixus sit sermo ne

fastidium pariat; semihorae tempus communiter non excedat._"

Saint François de Sales, too, recommends short sermons, and

remarks that excessive length was the general fault in the

preachers of his time.

He says:--"The good Saint François, in his rules to the

preachers of his Order, directs that their sermons should be

short.

{185}

"Believe me, and I speak from experience, the more you say, the

less will the hearers retain; the less you say, the more they

will profit. By dint of burdening their memory, you will

overwhelm it; just as a lamp is extinguished by feeding it with

too much oil, and plants are choked by immoderate irrigation.

"When a sermon is too long, the end erases the middle from the

memory, and the middle the beginning.

"Even mediocre preachers are acceptable, provided their

discourses are short; whereas even the best preachers are a

burden when they speak too long."

Is not long preaching very much like an attempt to surpass these

men, who were so highly imbued with the spirit of Christianity?

On the other hand, we have to deal with the most intelligent,

keen, and sensible people in the world. They understand a thing

when only half stated, and very often divine it. You hardly speak

before they are moved to accept or to reject; and yet we

overcharge them with long and heavy dissertations. To act in this

way, is to evince an utter unacquaintance with one's people, and

to display our own ignorance, in spite of all the learning which

we may possess. Moreover, it tends to excite antipathy.

{186}

The Frenchman does not care to be treated like a German: he does

not wish to be told every thing, thereby depriving him of the

pleasure of working out the truth for himself. Open the vein,

lance his imagination and feelings, let them flow on the road to

truth, and he will pursue it alone; perchance more quickly and

further than you. Nothing impairs intelligence, sentiment, and

the effusion of thought so much as redundancy of words and even

of ideas.

A sharp working man, who had been listening to a sermon, was once

asked--

"What did the preacher say? What do you remember of his

sermon?"

"Nothing at all."

"How's that? Surely you heard him?"

"Perfectly."

"How is it, then, that you did not understand any thing?"

"Ah," replied he, in an original language, which only the

people can command, "because all he had to say was hid behind a

mass of words."

There is too much reminiscence of our philosophical and

scholastic studies in our sermons. It often appears as if we were

speaking to a meeting of young bachelors in theology. We seem to

believe--and the notion is generally taken for granted--that we

have not adequately developed an idea unless we discuss it for an

hour or for three-quarters of an hour at the least.

{187}

Thus the audience is overwhelmed under the weight of a ponderous

erudition. It is not sufficient that they should have one proof

set before them, they must submit to any conceivable number on

the same subject. Or, to use M. de Cormenin's language, preachers

keep on using the flat side of their sword with weak proofs,

after they have given a decisive thrust with the weapon's point.

What has been said a thousand times before is repeated, and what

everybody knows, or what nobody needs to know, is dilated upon to

no purpose.

A man must be endowed with extraordinary genius who can bring

forcible thoughts to bear upon one and the same subject for the

space of a whole hour. But this consideration does not appear to

occasion the least embarrassment. The vacuities of thought are

filled up with words, and that is called developing an idea.

For the most part, we are all convinced that others speak too

long, but we are beguiled by the world's flattery.

We preach, and people are delighted, and send intimations to us

that we have acquitted ourselves to admiration; that they would

gladly have listened to us much longer, and so forth.

{188}

But we know better than any one else that the world does not

always speak the truth, and that we ourselves have frequently

denounced its want of sincerity. How comes it, then, that we are

deluded by such fine speeches? In flattering us, the world simply

plies its trade; but it is our duty not to give heed to its

blandishments. Moreover, there prevails at present a strong and

universal conviction that, generally speaking, our sermons are

too long.

Ask whom you please, enemies and friends, ask even the most

fervent Christians--thanks be to God there are intelligent men,

and men renowned for their charity among the sincerely

religious--ask them, I say, and they will tell you that our

sermons and services are too long. And if pious and intelligent

men are of that opinion, what must the masses think?

Undoubtedly, the intention is praiseworthy. ... We aim at

securing a greater good by lengthening out the services and

sermon. Still, it is equally certain that in so doing we discard

both prudence and charity. It resembles the ordinary treatment of

wives, who insist on giving their sick husbands good strong

broth, on the plea that it will do them more good than all the

chemist's medicines. The intention is unquestionably a kind one;

but it is no less true that the regimen, instead of benefiting

the patients, is most likely to kill them outright. Alas! the

same result has followed a similar injudicious treatment of men's

souls.

{189}

A man of high intellectual attainments, recently converted,

declared that the manner in which he was bored by sermons during

his youth, had kept him from listening to them for twenty years.

We complain, and with reason, that the masses have ceased to

frequent the church, and that sermons nowadays are not popular.

But do not we assist in driving them away? The services are

longer now than they were in the seventeenth and eighteenth

centuries, when there was more faith abroad among the people

generally.

Religion would most probably be greatly promoted if the sermon

and the services also were abridged. This might readily be

affected as regards the latter. Pitch your music out of the

window, or rather out of the door, as the former might not be

considered parliamentary. Or, take care at least that the polkas

with which your organist embellishes the _Magnificat_ shall not

occupy more than a quarter of an hour. With respect to the

sermons, they might easily be shortened without injuring them in

the least. Lop off all commonplace considerations from the

exordium, all useless discussions from the body of the discourse,

and all vague phrases from the peroration. Prune away all

redundant words, all parasitical epithets, using only those that

triple the force of the substantive. Be chary of words and

phrases; economize them as a miser does his crown-pieces.

{190}

The people affect those thoughts which are formulated in a single

word. They like such expressions as the following:--_vive! ... à

bas! ... mort! ... vengeance! ... liberté! ... justice!_ These

simple words often move men more than a long discourse.

In this respect, however, there has been a marked improvement in

many of our churches. There are parishes in Paris where a rule

prevails that no one shall preach more than forty minutes. In

some popular meetings, preachers are not allowed to speak beyond

fifteen minutes, and it is there that the most good is done.

Nowadays, brevity is one of the first conditions of success, and

of promoting the welfare of souls.

The preacher who was most frequented at Paris during the Lenten

season this year, hardly ever exceeded half-an-hour. There are,

undoubtedly, many other rules to be observed, but brevity will

not injuriously affect any of them.

The people are easily impressed: they like to be moved; but

nothing passes away so quickly as an emotion. In order to bring

them back to the church, we must have sermons of ten, seven, and

even of five minutes duration. The Mass and the sermon together

should not exceed half-an-hour.

{191}

This plan has been attempted. The experiment was made, and

produced the most happy and unexpected results. Intelligent and

zealous pastors, distressed at seeing that the greater part of

their flock scarcely ever heard the word of God or went to

church, established a low Mass, announced as specially designed

for the men, with a lecture of from ten to five minutes duration

every Sunday. ... Crowds flocked to the church, which was

sometimes found too small to hold them. Nor was this all: many

attended high Mass also, and even went to the confessional; which

they had not done, some for twenty, some for thirty, and some for

forty years. This success was obtained in irreligious as well as

religious districts, and under the most unfavorable

circumstances; even in populous manufacturing towns. And the same

plan is practicable everywhere. Frequently, nothing more is

required than a man to take the initiative with a right good

will, in order to attract crowds to the church and to religion.

But it will be objected: What can be said in ten or seven

minutes? Much, much more than is generally thought, when due

preparation is made, when we have a good knowledge of mankind,

and are well versed in religious matters. ... Have not a few

words often sufficed to revolutionize multitudes, and to produce

an immense impression?

{192}

The harangues of Napoleon only lasted a few minutes, yet they

electrified whole armies. The speech at Bourdeaux did not exceed

a quarter of an hour, and yet it resounded throughout the world.

Had it been longer, it would have been less effective. In fifteen

weeks, with a sermon of seven minutes every Sunday, one might

give a complete course of religious instruction, if the sermons

were well digested beforehand. [Footnote 17]

[Footnote 17: We have chosen the seven minutes sermon,

because experience has taught us that it attracts the

greatest numbers.]

If, then, you wish to be successful, in the first place fix the

length of your sermon, and never go beyond the time; be

inflexible on that score. Should you exceed it, apologize to your

audience for so doing, and prove in the pulpit of truth that you

can be faithful to your word.

In your course of instruction, do not follow the old method which

commences with metaphysical questions and principles; but adhere

to the plan which we have indicated: start from the known to the

unknown. ...

In the first place, disconnect religion from all prejudices and

passions, and from every thing uncongenial. Discard all

objections and antagonisms. Exhibit it as good and lovely, then

true, then divine, then as obligatory, proceeding onward from

thence to God's commandments and to the sacraments. If you

apprehend that the term "God's commandments" does not

sufficiently strike your hearers, you may call them the duties of

an upright man.

{193}

When about to compose your sermon, study your subject thoroughly,

grasp the salient points, and then write. ...

But do not stop there; begin afresh. Supposing that you have

written four pages, reduce them to two, taking care that all the

strong thoughts and sentiments remain. ... Use those terms which

belong to a single thought, those expressions which imprint

themselves--or, as the Scripture says, engrave the truth as with

a pen of steel--on the hearts of men, and which scatter it abroad

full of life and exultation. Nothing is so profitable as this

exercise: it cultivates and supplies the intellect, gives us a

deeper insight into Christianity and mankind, and it teaches us

how to think, and how to write. ...

During the reading of the Gospel, ascend the pulpit and be quite

ready. Place your watch by your side and begin thus:--"Last

Sunday we said so and so. To-day we continue." ... Then enter

fully into your subject, enlightening the minds of your hearers

or stirring up their hearts as may be suitable, during the

discourse. When the allotted time arrives, stop short and

conclude.

"But do speak more at length ... you are wrong in being so brief

... you only tantalize your audience ... you deprive them of a

real pleasure." Expostulations like these will pour in upon you;

but don't listen to them: be inflexible, for those who urge them

are enemies without knowing it.

{194}

Be more rigid than ever in observing the rule which you have

prescribed for yourself. Then your sermon will be talked of--it

will be a phenomenon--every body will come to _see_ a sermon of

seven minutes duration. The people will come; the rich will

follow. Faith will bring the one, and curiosity will attract the

other, and thus the Divine word will have freer course and be

glorified. ...

If the men do not come, appeal to the women, and ask them to help

you. If you want to attract the women, announce that you intend

preaching specially for the men. You will find this method

infallible; the men will follow.

Moreover, go yourself and find them out: visit the workshops,

factories, and wharves. Be particularly attentive to those who

are shabbily dressed and ill-favored. On taking your departure,

tell them with a smile that French politeness--in which you feel

quite sure they are not deficient--demands that visits received

should be returned: that you will dispense with their coming to

you personally, but will expect to see them at the seven minutes

sermon. The result will not disappoint you.

{195}

When you have many male hearers, you should reserve a space for

them. The women will complain that thereby they are placed

further away; but you must appease them with a compliment. Tell

them that you know their charity, and are persuaded that they

would not certainly wish to hinder the word of God from being

heard by those who need it most.

When you have well cultivated your congregation, when a strong

current of sympathy and charity has set in from them to you and

from you to them, when a number of conversions shall have been

made, then you may think of sending some of them to high Mass and

to Vespers. Don't fail to felicitate such:--"You have come hither

to hear me. So far well, and I am greatly rejoiced at it. Still

you may do something better: you may attend high Mass," adding

your reasons, and then conclude somewhat in this style:--"Now, I

hope that those who are rightly disposed will attend high Mass. I

only want the badly disposed, poor downright sinners, at my

sermons." You will be obeyed by some, and you will thereby do

much toward repopularizing religion; and when those who are not

converted fall sick they will say:--"Send for the man who

preaches the seven minutes sermon; I don't want any other." Thus

God will be blessed and glorified. ...

Here, then, you have a very simple and cheap means of restoring

the people to religion. It may be put into practice everywhere:

in great cities, in small towns, and even in hamlets. The subject

is one for serious reflection.

{196}

Even in our most religiously disposed towns, hardly a third of

the inhabitants habitually hear the word of God. Elsewhere,

matters are still worse; and yet all are sheep of the same Divine

pastor, all have a soul to save. Moreover, according to all

theologians, every parish priest of a cure is required, _sub

gravi_, to preach at low Mass, whenever the faithful generally do

not attend high Mass. Hence, by pursuing the course above

indicated, we may not only save others but shall also exonerate

ourselves.

{197}

The Clergy and the Pulpit in Their Relations to the People. · 第 6 / 12 章