In that country we have to divide class from class before we can fairly

view its manners. On the one hand we have a peasantry ill-taught, and

educated to servility; then a trading body, with another employed

in professions; and thirdly, a large order of nobles, degenerated

altogether from its ancient splendour, but preserving nevertheless all

the pride, all the indolence, all the sensuality, which characterized

it in the age of extended conquest and prosperous commerce. Upon all

these classes time has left traces, and the influence of their history

has been remarkably strong. A rich soil, a warm climate, an abundance

of precious minerals--these circumstances have been by no means without

their effect. The Roman Catholic religion, an army of priests, an

arbitrary government, and the habit of respecting persons more than

principles--these have a still more distinct impression on the national

character. A literature once illustrious but now dead, an empire once

splendid but now perished, a commerce once magnificent but now decayed,

a wealth once gorgeous and now turned to poverty, arts once noble

and now degraded--in these we find an index to the Spanish national

character. There is nothing virgin in the country, there is nothing

progressive, there is nothing with hope: all the glory of Spain belongs

to the past. The present is a wreck, and the future is a blank.

The manners of Spain present none of that simple purity which we find

in Switzerland. Every influence to which the people are subject tends

to corrupt them. Young women who stand at their windows, and see with

delight the flagellants go by, lashing themselves until the blood

splashes under their whips, cannot possess much dignity of mind. Yet

such are the spectacles which in Spain have been made familiar and

favourite to the populace. There is throughout Spanish society an

effort to appear better than they are, which in itself is an unfailing

indication of impurity. Men dare not when in company take any improper

liberties with women, even those whom they might be able privately

to seduce. On the stage they hoot a piece, which in France, or even

England, would not be regarded as in the slightest degree indelicate.

Nevertheless, in their retired rooms, ladies who are thus prudish

before the world, will suffer approaches gross enough, will amuse

themselves with obscene pictures, will pardon readily equivocal jokes,

and listen to songs of the worst indecency. Nor will they object to

behold the fandango danced, though, whatever some tolerant travellers

may say, it is proverbially obscene.

In many parts of the country, and especially in Seville, the ancient

national customs are still preserved, and young girls are always

when in the street accompanied by a duenna. In Madrid, where manners

have undergone a change, this is no longer the case; but in the more

primitive cities it is more prevalent. The guardianship of such a

companion, however, by no means implies absolutely a respectable

character, for common prostitutes, when they do walk abroad, are often

accompanied by old women who attract notice to them, and frequently

engage visitors to their places of resort.

The actual intercourse of the sexes in public is reserved, except with

respect to conversation. The gossip at a Tertullia, described by some

tourists as delightful, is characterized by English ladies not at

all inclined to satirize Spanish manners as very far from that which

women in good society among us are accustomed to hear. Children who

appear fresh from the nursery indulge in remarks which to many appear

positively obscene. The intellectual standard among them is low. Ladies

have been known who, with all the pride of an hereditary title, could

scarcely write their own names.

Good wives and good mothers are nevertheless very abundant in Spain.

It has produced heroines of every kind, from the intriguers of the

Camarilla to the defenders of a city. When “in love,” the Spanish woman

is exceedingly full of passion, and, carrying a knife, she occasionally

employs it to revenge a slight. These essential characteristics of

female manners are, however, gradually yielding under what we may term

the common law of society in Europe. Madrid is assimilating itself to

Paris, and Paris to London; so that as time progresses the peculiar

features wear off, and statistics alone may at some future period form

the measure of a people’s morality.

In the rural parts women share with men the heaviest labours of the

field. They may be observed as you pass along the highways, staggering

under the weight of enormous burdens; but this is a circumstance

attaching to poverty in all parts of the world, not to any nation in

particular. It is among the upper and middle classes in Spain, though

in many other countries the contrary is true, that women wear most

strongly a national characteristic appearance. In Madrid and the other

fashionable cities you are surprised by the vast number of women who

crowd the streets. They have no domestic occupations; they trouble

themselves little with the nurture or education of their children; they

devolve on hirelings the management of their household affairs; and

they relieve themselves from ennui by sauntering through the public

places, dressed with the minutest elegance, carrying their fans, and

bargaining on it, by every possible species of coquetry, for admiration

from the passers by.

A Spanish woman is a natural coquette, and when married cannot abandon

the habit familiarly known as flirtation. This gives rise to jealousy

on the husband’s part, which produces infinite misery.

Marriage is held in law a solemn and irrevocable contract. It is under

many legal regulations, and subject to the authority of the Roman

Catholic Church. In the hands of the clergy, indeed, there is vested a

prodigious arbitrary power, which they are careful to exercise, lest it

should become obsolete by disuse. They may still be seen interfering

in matrimonial affairs; and a glance at the manners of the Spaniards

some centuries ago will show that the clerical power has not decreased.

Public morality was carefully guarded under the rule of the Visigoths,

only to be tolerated during the Middle Ages, since which time it has

been at one time lax, at another severely regulated: at the present day

we find it in a strange state of confusion.

In the year 586-601, the king of the Visigoths of Spain forbade

prostitution in a most absolute manner under pain of severe punishment.

The daughter and the wife born of free parents, convicted of having

delivered themselves over to abandonment, received for the first

offence three hundred blows with a stick and were ignominiously

driven from the city; a relapse was punished with the same corporal

punishment, after which the culprit was handed over to a poor person,

who was obliged to employ her in performing the most menial offices.

If the parents were convicted of being accomplices and of having

participated in the gain derived by their daughter’s prostitution, each

one received one hundred blows. The slave who gave herself up publicly

to libertinage received three hundred blows, and when she was sent back

to her master, her head was shaved, and she was banished from the city

or sold in a place from whence she could not return. The master who

refused to submit to these stipulations of the law received in public

fifty blows with a stick or a whip, and the slave became the property

of some poor man pointed out by the king or the judge, under condition

of never being seen in the city again. If the master had participated

in the debauchery of his slave, that is if he had reaped any profit, he

received the same chastisement as the culprit.

This decree, made especially to repress prostitution in the cities,

applied equally to women of ill fame who infested the boroughs, the

villages, and the country at large.

This was at the commencement of the seventh century, and such were the

severities of the laws passed by the king of the barbarians, Recard by

name. The power of the Visigoths was broken a hundred years afterwards

by the Arabs. The conquered fled to the hilly country, taking refuge in

the mountains of the Asturias; but what laws were in force amongst them

we do not know--we only know that the manners of the age were shameful.

Perpetual wars, the capture and consequent pillage of villages, the

license of the soldiery, helped to constitute a state of things not at

all favourable for the developement of female chastity. The Christians

and the Mussulmans held in captivity the women taken in battle and

treated them as slaves.

The Arabs were soon in their turn conquered by the Moors, and, as

the struggle was less bloody, the two people mingled and exercised a

mutual influence over one another; but the influence of the Arabs was

more direct. “The loose manners of the East,” says M. Guardia, “and

the luxury ever prevalent amongst orientals, were impalpably engrafted

on the austerer habits of the Christians. Chivalry was found to be

perfectly compatible with debauchery.” The corruption of manners made

rapid strides. Prostitution reappeared in all its forms; nor was it, as

amongst the Arabs, hampered by municipal restrictions or fettered by

arbitrary and severe legislation.

In the fifteenth century the old regulations were resuscitated, and

immorality found itself once more compelled to bow to the dicta of

priests. Nevertheless these rigorous measures proved that the remedy

was worse than the evil. Secret debauchery took the place of public

libertinage, and clandestine prostitution increased accordingly.

In the year 1552, Charles V. promulgated an edict against the

keepers of houses of ill fame, considerably augmenting the existing

punishments. Four years later this law was confirmed by Philip II.

The sequel, however, proves that laws were powerless against public

corruption. Immorality is buoyant and contagious, and never so

mischievous as when it is hidden.

The end of the fifteenth century witnessed a reform. Prostitution came

to be regarded as a branch of the public administration, and placed

under severe laws and precise regulations.

About 1623, the health of the community began to be considered, and

hygienic measures were introduced. This was a great step, and one

rendered the more necessary by reason of the terrible ravages committed

by lues venerea, which at this epoch assumed the form of a terrible

epidemic.

Three quarters of a century elapsed, and the subject was carefully

studied, for in 1704 the council decided that the mayors of towns

could arrest and imprison immodest women, who showed themselves in

crowds upon the public promenades, and became an object of scandal

and disorder. But these coercive measures often repeated were without

effect. Soon the law was found to be powerless against corruption.

Since this epoch, public morality has been lax and openly disregarded.

The provinces imitated the example of the capital. At the end of the

eighteenth century an attempt was made to legislate, but nothing came

of it. In 1822, the Cortes passed a Bill relating to public health,

which, in point of fact, was nothing more or less than to establish

houses of ill fame and recognise their existence. This fell to the

ground through the opposition of a physician named Garcia.

In 1853, the population of Madrid was estimated at 270,000. These

figures include the floating portion, which is not insignificant.

Every woman who chooses to prostitute herself for money is perfectly

at liberty to do so; she has to render no account of her conduct, no

authorisation of any sort is necessary. The police give no passes nor

is there any registry. Under these circumstances statistics are next

to an impossibility. Not only does the law tolerate and acknowledge

prostitution, but it actually appears to cherish and foster it, by

permitting the grossest disorder, and by placing no obstacle in the

way of the incessant progress of debauchery. Local authority confines

itself to noticing only the most flagrant occurrences--such as a too

great number of women in the promenades and public thoroughfares,

or when a large number of men amongst the soldiers in garrison fall

victims to the ravages of syphilis. It follows from such a state of

things that the hospitals are gorged with sufferers, and frequently do

not suffice to contain all those who wish to enter. The consequence

is that this disease takes the most alarming forms, and does serious

injury to the public health.

We cannot possibly make anything like a correct estimate of the number

of women who live by prostitution in Madrid, although some manuscript

notes furnished to M. Guardia, place it at about one thousand. This

may only be an approximate calculation, and it is clearly putting

it at its minimum rather than its maximum. Two hundred of these are

kept women; though we are inclined to believe this much below the

actual numbers, as manners are very loose in Madrid, and the habits

of Spaniards incline in a singular degree to concubinage. Probably

six hundred women live in houses of ill fame, the keepers of which

exercise the most absolute authority over the unfortunates that come

into their power. In every one of these houses one finds an indefinite

number of young women, which varies from eight to ten. The woman who

keeps the place lodges and dresses them. In many of these places

there are only two or three resident women, for there are also houses

of appointment and convenience. If the number of indoor pensioners is

limited, those who walk about the streets are like locusts or the sand

of the sea-shore, next to innumerable. They have their abode, perhaps,

in their own families, or else they return to their lodgings. Most of

these public women are either milliners, seamstresses, laundresses,

and pastrycooks, or employed in the manufacture of tobacco. The people

who keep houses of ill fame find it to their interest to preserve the

health of their lodgers, which they are not, as a rule, negligent of,

but yet it is a fact that syphilis is prevalent in Spain to a frightful

extent. The authorities are at no pains to prevent its ramification,

and the climate is only too favourable for its growth and extension.

We divide the women who live by prostitution in Madrid into three

classes: 1st, Those who are kept; 2nd, Those who live in houses of

ill fame; and 3rdly, Those who are free, and merely make use of the

above-mentioned houses for a short time. Within this latter category

we must include about three hundred prostitutes, who constitute the

lowest grade and infest the worst parts of the capital. These have been

recruited perhaps from all classes, having sunk lower and lower, until

every vestige of shame and modesty having totally disappeared, they

traffic for the bare means of subsistence and submit to any and every

degradation to obtain it. They even exercise their avocation in the

streets and public places. On the other hand, prostitution has plenty

of places of resort, such as cafés, public houses, and refreshment

rooms.

The police are fully empowered to take into custody any woman guilty of

an open breach of the law, although they may not interfere with her for

plying her trade, or we might, with some justice, say her profession.

Sometimes the magisterial authorities banish them from Madrid, thus

getting rid of the most dangerous characters, who, however, like black

sheep in the provincial flocks, only serve to carry corruption into

districts hitherto uncontaminated.

There is in Madrid a hospital for foundlings, but the fecundity of

Spanish prostitutes is not considerable. This is an asylum for every

child found in the streets or brought by mothers who wish to get rid of

their children. On an average it receives annually from 4500 to 5000

infants. It was founded in the sixteenth century by charitable people.

AMSTERDAM.

One is astonished--exclaim MM. Schneevooght (first physician at

the hospital of Amsterdam), Van Frigt (assistant surgeon to the

same hospital and the syphilitic dispensary), Van Oordt (student in

the Parisian hospitals)--one is astonished that in a country where

legislation adapts itself to the exigencies of modern times, among a

people signalized by a practical genius, an enlightened administration

has only very lately adopted the only measures to check the scourge of

prostitution.

In Holland religious scruples have yielded before considerations of a

higher nature. The Government of the Netherlands has at last decided

to leave to the _Communes_ the power of preventing by regulation the

sad consequences of free and unrestrained prostitution. Supervision,

independantly of the services which it renders to the public health,

assists to prevent the extension of the evil of which we write.

It is easy to suppose that the capital of Holland offers peculiar

facilities for the growth of this vice, which always flourishes in

commercial and maritime cities, and more especially when the two are

combined.

In 1851 1852 1855

The municipal population

was 221,111 240,669 250,304

Floating 3,532 5,687 7,357

Military 881 1,030 793

The number of strangers that come here, the mariners that commerce

attracts, the luxury that reigns among the upper classes, the number of

young men of good family, who are condemned to a life of celibacy by

inadequate means, unite to relax the morals of the Dutch.

Even now the municipal authorities recoil before the difficulties

thrown in their way by the independent spirit of the people, who do not

like restrictions imposed by authority, however salutary they may be.

A curious book which appeared in 1648 relates an edict published in

1506, by virtue of which only agents of the municipal police were

allowed to open and keep disorderly houses and in certain designated

quarters.

In 1789 a commission of health was convoked, and strict precautions

taken to guard against infection. It followed from this that 177 women

were doctored in one year, a number nearly double that of the year

before.

The author of a book about medicine, which appeared in Amsterdam in

1820, complained bitterly of the depravity of manners which led to the

decrease of marriages, and of the great number of prostitutes who day

and night frequented the streets and other public places to attract

passengers by indecent gestures and immodest proposals: more than 800

were known to the police, of which about 200 lived in tolerated houses.

Coming back to modern times, during the year 1850 we find there were in

Amsterdam 764 illegitimate births, among 21,365 unmarried inhabitants,

between 16 and 30 years, of the male sex, and among 25,207 of the

female sex. At the same time there were twenty disorderly houses and

400 prostitutes not inscribed, but simply known to the police.

There is a society in Amsterdam for rescuing fallen women who wish to

lead a new life. It is called the Sternbeck Asylum, and is productive

of great good.

To allude to the insignificant part played by the police is to avow the

insufficiency of the hygienic department.

Although the girls in the tolerated houses are supposed to be compelled

to submit to examination, any inspection, in reality, is voluntary on

their part. Unfortunately there are a vast number of quacks in the

city, who only prolong and aggravate disease, instead of curing it.

There is a hospital for venereal affections, with two wards, one with

24 beds for the men, the other with 50 beds for the women, which are

all at the service of those affected with syphilis. Besides this there

is a syphilitic dispensary, where gratuitous attendance may be obtained.

Syphilis has increased very much lately among the soldiers in garrison.

For instance take the subjoined figures, extending over five years:

1852 1853 1854 1855 1856

---- ---- ---- ---- ----

87 94 199 156 182

All women must be inscribed, whether living in houses or by themselves.

Disorderly houses are under the supervision of the police. The keeper

of one of these houses may not change his residence, under penalty of

a fine of 7 florins and the loss of his licence, without communicating

with the authorities, and loose women must be provided with a license.

The regulations are very much the same all over the country, at

Utrecht, Haarlem, &c.

BELGIUM.

In the year 1856 the floating population of Brussels and its suburbs

was 260,080, to which the garrison contributed 2414. In the same year

the total registration of prostitutes, according to the law in their

respect provided, numbered 638; these were divided into “filles de

maison” and “éparses.” Although the police regulations are remarkably

stringent, their effect upon public morality is absolutely nil,

although it must be admitted that their _surveillance_ has a beneficial

effect upon the public health. Prostitutes in Brussels, disgusted by

the exercise of municipal power, fly without the walls, and withdraw

to St. Josse, which, with other extra-mural spots, is much infested

with them. The same state of things is observable, more or less, in

Antwerp, Bruges, Ostend, Ghent, Mons, Liege, and Namur. By the Belgian

regulations the circulation of prostitutes in the streets after sundown

is prohibited; women under twenty-one may not be inscribed, and the

medical visitation takes place twice a week by the divisional surgeon,

and whenever else he may please by the superintending officer. All the

éparses and third-class filles de maison are seen at the dispensary,

and the first and second classes of the latter order at their

domiciles. The éparses may secure this privilege by payment of an extra

franc per visit.

The tariff of duties payable by houses and women is as follows:--

Every first-class maison de passe pays 25 francs per month.

Every second-class maison de passe pays 15 francs per month.

Every third-class maison de passe pays 5 francs per month.

Every first class “maison de débauche” pays 60 to 78 francs monthly,

according to the number of its authorized occupants--from 6 to 10--and

2 francs extra for each such additional person.

Every such second-class house pays 20 to 32 francs for from 3 to 7

women, and 1 franc extra for every additional.

Every such third-class house pays from 8 to 16 francs for from 2 to 7

women, and 1 franc extra for each additional.

Every first-class fille éparse pays on each inspection 40 centimes.

Every second-class fille éparse pays on each inspection 30 centimes.

Every third-class fille éparse pays on inspection 15 centimes.

Upon punctuality for four successive visits these payments are

returned, for inexactitude they are doubled.

Directly a male military patient is taken into hospital he is minutely

questioned by the surgeon who attends him as to the exact locality

of the house wherein he thinks he was infected, and the appearance

of the woman. She is soon arrested; and if the result of the medical

examination should prove her diseased, she is placed on the police

surgeon’s list and sent to hospital, where she is restrained for some

time from spreading contagion.

HAMBURG.

Hamburg, from its peculiar situation and the extent of its commerce,

may be considered one of the great centres of trade at present existing

in the world, and for that reason it deserves more than a cursory

glance or a casual notice.

Documents drawn up during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries

relating to public women are still in a state of preservation.

There is a Code Municipal for the city of Hamburg (1292), which

contains the most ancient regulations of this description.

The 17th, 18th, 19th, and 30th of this code regulates in detail the

costume of women of ill-fame and the districts where they are allowed

to dwell. Their number is not chronicled, but it appears to have been

considerable.

The contractors or speculators in women were by successive enactments

heavily taxed in 1562: the sum fixed for each woman was from 75 talents

to the extraordinary sum of 569; but this is explained by an urgent

want on the part of the municipality.

The provisions of the ancient code were maintained up to 1603, when

laws of unexampled rigour were passed. Brothels were closed, women

and their paramours were publicly exposed, and, as far as possible,

outlawed.

In order to describe the state of prostitution in the 19th century we

must call the attention of our readers to an enactment of the year

1807: it is of some length, and we have only extracted briefly from it.

1. Every person who lodges women must send to the pretor’s office

a list of the names of people living there, with their age, their

birthplace, and the time of their entering the establishment.

2. When a new girl arrives she must be presented at the office.

3. When a woman leaves, the office must be informed of the fact in

writing, and her new abode pointed out.

4. The landlord or landlady must particularly impress upon the lodgers

not to have connection with men having a contagious malady.

London Labour and the London Poor, Vol. 4 · 第 42 / 99 段