SOME PRINCIPLES OF BOOK AND PICTURE SELECTION.

(_See_ p. 54.)

MELVIL DEWEY: I want to say a word about that New York list of pictures.

When we printed that bulletin a great chorus of criticism arose from

among the newspapers, and we smiled; we said it was characteristic of

newspapers to discuss a thing without knowing at all what they were

talking about. But I did not suppose that same characteristic would

appear in this Association. Our bulletin states very distinctly what it

is for, and it makes its own case absolutely infallible. We had to meet

the problem in the state of New York, of circulating pictures bought

with the taxpayers' money, to be put on the walls of the school

houses--Jewish schools, Roman Catholic schools and schools of many

denominations. Under those peculiar conditions it was a question whether

we could carry the movement at all, and we selected about 50 people,

whose judgment was most reliable, and asked them, out of several hundred

pictures, to select 100 that would be open to no objection of any kind.

There was no effort whatever to select the hundred _best_ pictures. They

simply made a list that would pass the legislature. It included pictures

that people ridiculed sadly; and yet we had on file letters from

prominent people in the state to the effect that they would protest

against certain well-known pictures, and we thought it wiser not to

raise issues over minor details. Our bulletin is simply a list of

pictures that have been passed by representatives of various religious

and ethical interests. You may think it most absurd that certain

pictures, perhaps the most famous, should have been voted out of such a

list, but if you were to go through the schools of the state of New York

or any other state you would find that there are conscientious mothers

and fathers, who have had no opportunity for art training, who would get

down on their knees and pray that some of these pictures might not be

put on the walls of the school room. If you do not know that, you are

not familiar with the sentiment in the rural districts. There was a

specific purpose in our action; we heard all of these criticisms, and we

did the thing that seemed right and best under the circumstances. There

are about a hundred of us on the state library staff, but we do not yet,

as a body, venture to feel as omniscient as some single individuals

regard themselves. I strongly believe that it is not a bad thing to take

the opinion of experts. We are perfectly willing to show respect to the

specialist in his own field, and I think it is mighty unwise advice to

give young librarians, when they are told not to ask the opinion of a

good specialist, whose verdict commands the confidence of the public.

Adjourned at 12.05 p.m.

_FOURTH SESSION._

(LIBRARY HALL, MADISON, WIS., MONDAY AFTERNOON, JULY 8.)

President CARR called the meeting to order at 2.25 p.m., and in a few

words expressed the appreciation of the Association for the delightful

arrangements that had made "Madison day" so interesting and enjoyable.

Papers and Proceedings of the Twenty-Third General Meeting of the American Library Association Held at Waukesha, Wisconsin, July 4-10, 1901 · 第 165 / 275 题