WHAT MAY BE DONE FOR LIBRARIES BY THE CITY.

BY THOMAS L. MONTGOMERY, _Trustee Free Library of Philadelphia_.

When, in the course of human events, it became necessary for our people

to dissolve the political bonds which connected them with another,

pretty much everything was declared a free and an inalienable right with

the exception of the public library. Whether it would have escaped the

attention of that founder of circulating libraries and everything else

that is useful, had it not been a time of extraordinary pressure of

business, or whether he purposely neglected it in the belief that a

people that had expressed such lofty sentiments as to life, liberty and

the pursuit of happiness might well be trusted to consider such matters

in due time it is not our purpose to discuss. He does not hesitate to

give credit to the libraries in his autobiography for making the common

tradesmen and farmers as intelligent as most gentlemen in other

countries, and for contributing in some degree to the stand so generally

made throughout the colonies in defense of their privileges. It was not

until about 1850 that the desirability of a city library was suggested

to the City Council of Boston by Josiah Quincy, then mayor. The council

cautiously Resolved, "That it would accept any donation from citizens

or others for the purpose of commencing a public city library and that

whenever the library shall be of the value of $30,000 it will be

expedient for the city to provide a suitable place and arrangements to

enable it to be used by the citizens with as great a degree of freedom

as the security of the property will permit." In July, 1852, the

trustees made a report "that in their opinion the finances of the city

will not permit of the erecting of a building and the purchase of an

ample library." They suggest "a moderate expenditure on the part of the

city for the purchase of books and the compensation of a librarian." It

was soon after this that Mr. Bates made his famous gift of $50,000 worth

of books "on condition that the city provide an adequate building which

shall be an ornament to the city." A complete history of this

institution would seem to be the best possible answer which could be

made to the question before us. What can the city do for the free

library. With a magnificent collection of 700,000 books, selected under

the administration of some of the best men who have dignified our

profession, and housed in the most expensive building ever erected by a

city for such a purpose, it would appear that the citizen of Boston

might rightly exclaim "Si monumentum quaeris, circumspice."

The things that can be done by a city are innumerable; what it _ought_

to do and what it _will_ do are perhaps more easily dealt with. Thinking

I might obtain some information on the subject I asked the question of

the librarian of the Free Library of Philadelphia. He settled himself in

his chair and assuming the tone of an oracle said that there were three

things that the city should do for its library. 1. Provide an adequate

appropriation for its maintenance; 2. Provide an extra appropriation for

emergencies; and 3. Provide a special appropriation for some particular

work which the librarian might be particularly interested in at the

time. I asked several other prominent librarians the same question and

their answers were to the same purport--namely, if the city could

furnish sufficient money they felt themselves fully competent to build

up an ideal institution.

We all know as a matter of fact that the strong libraries of the country

have been built up by other means than the mere appropriation of money

by city councils, and it is not unreasonable to mention as the first of

these the librarian. The city should see to it that this individual is a

man (or woman) strong, intellectual and vigorous, without bumptiousness,

which is often mistaken for vigor, and with those qualities which will

procure for him respectful attention from even those who may be opposed

to him. I have often heard addresses made before this Association

bewailing the fact that the city librarian had to deal with certain

political elements which very much hampered him. I should regard this

state of affairs as belonging to the time when the college president was

necessarily a professor of moral philosophy whose duties consisted of

receiving the senior class for one hour a week to discuss Whewell's

"Elements." Such an officer must now be an active administrative power

as well as an intellectual entity to at all meet the modern

requirements, and in like manner the public librarian should deem it a

privilege to meet the representatives of the city government and to have

the opportunity of impressing the needs of his institution upon them.

There is no better test of the capacity of the man for the great work in

which he is engaged.

Speaking practically I would state that in the building up of the

Philadelphia Free Library in which I have taken an active interest, the

political elements have always responded most generously to our

requests, and that the library has been more inconvenienced by the

writings and personal influence of certain well-to-do-citizens upon whom

the word "paternalism" has acted as a nightmare than by any difficulty

with the city government.

While the city should provide means and a proper official to conduct the

institution it should take much more care in the selection of the board

of trustees than is usually the case. They should be representative men,

who not only should be able to assist the librarian in the formation of

an educational institution, but also be able to devote a considerable

amount of time to matters relating to its policy. If the librarian is

not a systematic business man, one of the board or a committee should be

delegated to attend to the financial affairs, as it is absolutely

necessary that the accounts shall be at all times in as good condition

as in the most punctilious business house.

I would also suggest that a certain modesty be observed in the carrying

out of such work by a municipality. It is hard to think of anything that

could be said for this proposition when the magnificent buildings of

Boston, Chicago and Pittsburgh are taken into consideration; but I would

respectfully submit that the feeling of unrest among the great army of

industrial workers throughout the civilized world is growing. With the

tremendous progress in science and industry these people are claiming

that they can see no gain in the position of the common people. This

discontent has manifested itself lately in the opposition of the labor

organizations of certain towns to the munificent proposition made by one

of the most conscientious men who has ever been numbered among the

multimillionaires of the world. While it is not always wise to consider

too seriously the socialistic murmurings of a few negative people, I

submit that it is our duty to consider the effect produced upon the

poorest and most scantily clad patron of our libraries.

It is necessary that the library should be housed in a fireproof

building as soon as possible, and the owners of valuable books will

always choose such an institution for such gifts as they may make. I

believe that the Boston Library has received donations equal to half the

cost of the building since it has been housed in Copley square.

Finally, the city should insist that the library be an educational

institution and not receive its appropriation for recreation mainly. The

extraordinary demand for light fiction in public libraries has led to a

very unsatisfactory condition of affairs, and it is not uncommon to find

300 copies of a new novel necessary to at all meet the demand. There is

every indication that the public library will be furnished with a happy

release from this call upon their resources by the institution of the

Book Lovers' Library which has now extended its branches to all the

important cities. If this system can be extended on good business

principles, the happiness of public libraries would be complete

notwithstanding the slight falling off in circulation that might follow.

The motto of every such institution should be: _Libri libere liberis_,

which being freely translated, means: "A free people should have open

shelves if possible."

Papers and Proceedings of the Twenty-Third General Meeting of the American Library Association Held at Waukesha, Wisconsin, July 4-10, 1901 · 第 41 / 275 题