8. ¶Brutus overthrew the Tarquins for the following reason. During the

siege of Ardea the children of Tarquin were one day dining with Brutus

and Collatinus, since these two were of their own age and relatives;

and they fell into a discussion and finally into a dispute about the

virtue of their wives,--each one giving the preference to his own

spouse. And, as all the women happened to be absent from the camp,

they decided straightaway that night, before they could be announced,

to take horse and ride away to all of them simultaneously. This they

did, and found all engaged in a carousal except Lucretia, wife of

Collatinus, whom they discovered at work on wool. This fact about her

becoming noised abroad led Sextus to desire to outrage her. Perchance

he even felt some love for her, since she was of surpassing beauty;

still it was rather her reputation than her body that he desired to

ruin. He watched for an opportunity when Collatinus was among the

Rutuli, hurried to Collatia, and coming by night to her house as that

of a kinswoman obtained both food and lodging. At first he tried to

persuade her to grant her favors to him, but as he could not succeed

he attempted force. When he found he could make no progress by this

means either, he devised a plan by which in the most unexpected way he

compelled her to submit voluntarily to be debauched. To his

declaration that he would cut her throat she paid no attention, and

his statement that he would make away with one of the servants she

listened to in contempt. When, however, he threatened to lay the body

of the servant beside her and spread the report that he had found them

sleeping together and killed them he was no longer to be resisted: and

she, fearing it might be believed that this had so happened, chose to

yield to him and die after giving an account of the affair rather than

lose her good name in perishing at once. For this reason she did not

refuse to commit adultery, but afterward she made ready a dagger

beneath the pillow and sent for her husband and her father. As soon as

they had come she shed many tears, then spoke with a sigh: "Father, I

utter your name because I have disgraced it less than my husband's.

It is no honorable deed I have done this last night, but Sextus forced

me, threatening to kill me and a slave together and pretend he had

found me sleeping with the man. This threat compelled me to sin, to

prevent you from believing that such a thing had taken place. And I,

because I am a woman, will treat my case as becomes me: but do you, if

you are men and care for your wives and for your children, avenge me,

free yourselves, and show the tyrants what manner of creatures you are

and what manner of woman they have outraged." Having spoken to this

effect she did not wait for any reply but immediately drawing the

dagger from its hiding place stabbed herself. (Valesius, p. 574.)

9. Dio, Second Book: "And he [Footnote: Van Herweiden's reading is the

one adopted in this doubtful passage.] went outside of Roman territory

making frequent trials of neighboring peoples." (Bekker, Anecd. p. 164,

25.)

1. ¶All crowds of people judge measures according to the men who

direct them, and of whatever sort they ascertain the men to be, they

believe that the measures are of the same sort. (Mai, p. 140.)

[Frag. XI]

2. Every one prefers the untried to the well known, attaching great

hope to the uncertain in comparison with what has already gained his

hatred. (Ib.)

3. All changes are very dangerous, and especially do those in

governments work the greatest and most numerous evils to both

individuals and state. Sensible men, therefore, decide to remain under

the same forms continually, even if they be not very good, rather than

by changing to have now one, now another, and be continually

wandering. (Ib.)

4. Dio, 2nd Book: "When he had learned this he accordingly both came

to them the following day [lacuna]" (Bekker, Anecd., p. 178, 20.)

5. In 3rd Book of Dio: "Whose father also ruled you blamelessly."

(Ib., p. 120, 24.)

6. Dio's 3rd Book: "Of the fact that he loves you, you could get no

greater proof than his eagerness to live in your midst and his action

in having his possessions long since brought here." (Ib., p. 139, 26,

and p. 164, 28.)

7. Dio's 3rd Book: "How would it pay any one to do this?" (Ib, p.

155,14.)

8. Dio's 3rd Book: "As Romulus also enjoined upon us." (Ib., p. 139,

29.)

9. ¶Every person comes to possess wishes and desires according to his

fortune and whatever his circumstances be, of like nature are also the

opinions he acquires. (Mai, p. 141.)

10. ¶The business of kingship, more than any other, demands not merely

virtue, but also great understanding and intelligence, and it is not

possible without these qualities for the man who takes hold of it to

show moderation. Many, for example, as if raised unexpectedly to some

great height, have not endured their elevation, but startled from

their senses have fallen and made failures of themselves and have

shattered all the interests of their subjects. (Mai, ib.)

11. With regard to the future form a judgment from what they have

done, but do not be deceived by what they as suppliants falsely

pretend. Unholy deeds proceed in every case from a man's real purpose,

but any one may concoct creditable phrases. Hence judge from what a

man has done, not from what he says he will do. (Mai, ib.)

12. 3rd Book of Dio: "It is done not merely by the actual men who rule

them, but also by those who share the power with those rulers."

(Bekker, Anecd. p.130, 23, and p.164, 32.)

In the preceding fragment we have, apparently, some comment of Dio

himself on the change in the Roman government (from monarchy to

republic) together with scraps of two speeches,--namely, that of the

envoys of Tarquinius to the Roman people, and that of Brutus in reply.

[Frag. XII]

1. ¶Valerius, the colleague of Brutus, although he had proved himself

the most democratic of men came near being murdered in short order by

the multitude: they suspected him, in fact, of being eager to become

sole sovereign. They would have slain him, indeed, had he not quickly

anticipated their action by courting their favor. He entered the

assembly and bent the rods which he had formerly used straight, and

took away the surrounding axes that were bound in with them. After he

had in this way assumed an attitude of humility, he kept a sad

countenance for some time and shed tears: and when he at last managed

to utter a sound, he spoke in a low fearful voice with a suggestion of

a quaver. [The general subject is speechmaking.] (Mai, p. 141.)

2. On account of whom (plur.) also [Collatinus] was enraged.

Consequently Brutus so incited the populace against him that they came

near slaying him on the spot. They did not quite do this, however, but

compelled him to resign without delay. They chose as colleague to the

consul in his place Publius Valerius, who had the additional title of

Poplicola. This appellation translated into Greek signifies "friend of

the people" or "most democratic." (Zonaras, 7, 12. Cp. Haupt, _Hermes_

XIV.)

[Frag. XIII]

¶The temple of Jupiter was dedicated by Horatius, as determined by

lot, although Valerius made the declaration that his son was dead, and

arranged to have this news brought to him during the very performance

of his sacred office, with the purpose that Horatius under the blow of

the misfortune and because in general it was impious for any one in

grief to fulfill the duties of priest, should yield to him the

dedication of the structure. The other did not refuse credence to the

report--for it was noised abroad by many trustworthy persons--yet he

did not surrender his ministry: on the contrary, after bidding some

men to leave unburied the body of his son, as if it were a stranger's,

in order that he might seem unconcerned regarding the rites due to it,

he then performed all the necessary ceremonies. (Valesius, p.577.)

[Frag. XIV]

1. (Tarquinius continued to supplicate Klara Porsina.) (Zonaras, 7,

12. Cp. Tzetz. Hist. 6, 201. Plutarch, Poplic. 16, has "Lara

Porsina.")

2. Dio in 4th Book: "But they overran the Roman territory and harried

everything up to the wall." (Bekker, Anecd. p.152, 3 and 1.) 3.

Larta Porsenna, an Etruscan, or, perhaps, Klara Porsenna, was

proceeding against Rome with a great army. But Mucius, a noble Roman

soldier, after equipping himself in arms and dress of Etruscans then

started to spy upon them, wishing to kill Porsenna. Beside the latter

at that time was sitting his secretary, who in the Etruscan tongue was

called Clusinus; and Mucius, doubtful which might be the king, killed

Clusinus instead of the king. The man was arrested, and when Porsenna

asked him: "Why in the world did you do this thing? What injury had

you received from him?" the other cried out: "I happen to be not

Etruscan but Roman; and three hundred others of like mind with me who

are now hunting thee to slay thee." This he had spoken falsely; and,

with his right hand thrust into the fire, he gazed on Porsenna as

though another were suffering: and when the prince enquired: "Why do

you look fixedly upon us?" he said: "Reflecting how I erred in failing

to slay thee and in thy stead killed one whom I thought Porsenna." And

when Porsenna exclaimed: "You shall now become my friend!" Mucius

rejoined: "If thou becom'st a Roman." Porsenna admiring the man for

his uprightness becomes a friend to the Romans and checks the tide of

battle. (Tzetzes, Chiliades, VI, 201-223.)

(Cp. Scholia on John Tzetzes's Letters in Cramer's Anecd. Oxon., vol.

III, p.360, 30: "Clusinus was the name of Porsenna's secretary,

according to what Dio says"; and Zonaras, 7, 12: "Drawing his sword he

killed his secretary, who was sitting beside him and was similarly

arrayed.")

4. Dio's 4th Book: "And he [Footnote: Porsenna.] presented to the maiden

[Footnote: Clælia] both arms (or so some say) and a horse." (Bekker,

Anecd. p.133, 8.)

5. After this the Tarquins endeavored on several occasions, by forming

alliances with tribes bordering on Roman dominions, to recover the

kingdom; but they were all destroyed in the battles save the sire,

who, moreover, was called Superbus (or, as a Greek would say, Proud).

Subsequently he found his way to Cyme of Opicia and there died. Thus

the careers of the Tarquins reached a conclusion. And after their

expulsion from the kingdom consuls, as has been stated, were chosen by

the Romans. One of these was Publius Valerius, who became consul four

times,--the one to whom also the name Poplicola was applied. (Zonaras

7, 12 sq. Cp. Haupt, _Hermes_ XIV.)

6. And the management of the funds they assigned to others in order

that the men holding the consular office might not possess the great

influence that would spring from their having the revenues in their

power. Now for the first time "stewards" began to be created and they

called them _quæstors_. These in the first place tried capital cases,

from which fact they have obtained this title,--on account of their

_questionings_ and on account of their search for truth as the result

of _questionings_. But later they acquired also management of the

public funds and received the additional name of Stewards ([Greek:

tamiai]). After a time the courts were delivered over to different

persons, while these officials were managers of the funds. (Zonaras 7,

13. Cp. Haupt, _Hermes_, XIV.)

7. Dio's 4th Book: "And they provided them [Footnote: Probably a

reference to the quæstors.] with separate titles besides in general

making very different provision for them in the different cases."

(Bekker, Anecd. p.133, 16.)

8. Dio in 5th Book: "The lords filling them with hope on certain

points." (Ib. p.140, 10.)

9. Dio in 5th Book: "With this accordingly he honored him." (Ib.

p.175, 19.)

[Frag. XV]

¶To a large extent success consists in planning secretly, acting at the

opportune moment, following one's own counsel somewhat, and in having no

chance to fall back upon any one else, but being obliged to take upon

one's self the responsibility for the issue, however it turns out.

[Footnote: Fragment XV may perhaps be a comment on dictatorships.]

(Mai, p.142.)

[Frag. XVI]

1. They had recourse to civil strife. And the reason is plain. Those

whose money gave them influence desired to surpass their inferiors in

all respects as though they were their sovereigns, and the weaker

citizens, sure of their own equal rights, were unwilling to obey them

even in some small point. The one class, insatiate of freedom, sought

to enjoy the property of the other; and this other, uncontrolled in

its pride of place, to enjoy the fruits of the former's labors. So it

was that they sundered their former relations, wherein they were wont

harmoniously to assist each other with mutual profit, and no longer

made distinctions between foreign and native races. Indeed, both

disdained moderation, and the one class set its heart upon an extreme

of dominion, the other upon an extreme of resistance to voluntary

servitude; consequently they missed the results accomplished by their

previous allied efforts and inflicted many striking injuries, partly

in defence against each other's movements and partly by way of

anticipating them. More than all the rest of mankind they were at

variance save in the midst of particularly threatening dangers that

they incurred in the course of successive wars,--wars due chiefly to

their own dissensions; and for the sake of the respite many prominent

men on several occasions brought on these conflicts purposely. This,

then, was the beginning of their suffering more harm from each other

than from outside nations. And the complexion of their difficulties

inspires me to pronounce that it was impossible that they should be

deprived of either their power or their sway, unless they should lose

it through their own contentions. (Mai, ib.)

2. They were especially irritated that the senators were not of the

same mind after obtaining something from them as they were while

requesting it, but after making them numbers of great promises while

in the midst of danger failed to perform the slightest one of them

when safety had been secured. (Mai, p.143.)

3. So to the end that they might not fight in a compact mass, but each

division struggle separately for its own position and so become easier

to handle, they divided the army. [Footnote: Cp. Livy, II, 30.] (Ib.)

4. ¶The populace, as soon as Valerius the dictator became a private

citizen, began a most bitter contest, going so far even as to overturn

the government. The well-to-do classes insisted, in the case of debts,

upon the very letter of the agreement, refusing to abate one iota of

it, and so they both failed to secure its fulfillment and came to be

deprived of many other advantages; they had failed to recognize the

fact that an extreme of poverty is the heaviest of curses and that the

desperation which results from it is, especially if shared by a large

number of persons, very difficult to combat. This is why not a few

politicians voluntarily choose the course which is expedient in

preference to that which is absolutely just. Justice is often worsted

in an encounter with human nature and sometimes suffers total

extinction, whereas expediency, by parting with a mere fragment of

justice, preserves the greater portion of it intact.

Now the cause of most of the troubles that the Romans had lay in the

unyielding attitude adopted by the more powerful class toward its

inferiors. Many remedies were afforded them against delays in payment

of debts, one of which was that in case it happened that several

persons had been lending to anybody, they had authority to divide his

body piecemeal according to the proportionate amounts that he was

owing. Yet, however much this principle had been declared legal, still

it had surely never been put into practice. For how could a nation

have proceeded to such lengths of cruelty when it frequently granted

to those convicted of some crime a refuge for their preservation and

allowed such as were thrust from the cliffs of the Capitoline to live

in case they should survive the experience? (Mai, p.143. Cp. Zonaras.

7, 14.)

5. ¶Those who were owing debts took possession of a certain hill and

having placed one Gaius at their head proceeded to secure their food

from the country as from hostile territory, thereby demonstrating that

the laws were weaker than arms, and justice than their desperation.

The senators being in terror both that this party might become more

estranged and that the neighboring tribes in view of the crisis might

join in an attack upon them proposed terms to the rebels offering

everything that they hoped might please them. The seceders at first

were for brazening it out, but were brought to reason in a remarkable

way. When they kept up a series of disorderly shouts, Agrippa, one of

the envoys, begged them to hearken to a fable and having obtained

their consent spoke as follows. Once all the Members of Man began a

contention against the Belly, saying that they worked and toiled

without food or drink, being at the beck and call of the Belly in

everything, whereas it endured no labor and alone got its fill of

nourishment. And finally they voted that the Hands should no longer

convey aught to the Mouth nor the latter receive anything, to the end

that the Belly might so far as possible come to lack both food and

drink and so perish. Now when this measure was determined and put into

execution, at first the entire body began to wither away and next it

collapsed and gave out. Accordingly, the members through their own

evil state grew conscious that the Belly was the salvation of them and

restored to it its nourishment.

On hearing this the multitude comprehended that the abundance of the

prosperous also supports the condition of the poor; therefore they

showed greater mildness and accepted a reconciliation on being granted

a release from their debts and from seizures therefor. This then, was

voted by the senate. (Mai, p.144. Cp. Zonaras 7, 14.) The account of

John of Antioch, frag. 46 (Müller, fr. hist gr. IV, p.556) regarding

this secession of the plebs seems to have been taken from intact books

of Dio. (Cp. Haupt, _Hermes_ XIV, p.44, note 1; also G. Sotiriadis,

Zur Kritik des Johannes von Antiochia, Supplem. annal. philol. vol.

XVI, p.50.)

6. And it seemed to be most inconsistent with human conditions, and to

many others also, some willingly, some unwillingly [lacuna]

¶Whenever many men gathered in a compact body seek their own

advantage by violence, for the time being they have some equitable

agreement and display boldness, but later they become separated and

are punished on various pretexts. (Mai, p.146. Cp. Zonaras, 7, 15.)

7. Through the tendency, natural to most persons, to differ with their

fellows in office (it is always difficult for a number of men to

attain harmony, especially in a position of any influence)--through

this natural tendency, then, all their power was dissipated and torn

to shreds. None of their resolutions was valid in case even one of

them opposed it. They had originally received their office for no

other purpose than to resist such as were oppressing their

fellow-citizens, and thus he who tried to prevent any measure from

being carried into effect was sure to prove stronger than those who

supported it. (Mai, ib. Cp. Zonaras 7, 15.)

[Frag. XVII]

1. For it is not easy for a man either to be strong at all points or

to possess excellence in both departments,--war and peace,--at once.

Those who are physically strong are, as a rule, weak-minded and

success that has come in unstinted measure generally does not

luxuriate equally well everywhere. This explains why after having

first been exalted by the citizens to the foremost rank he was not

much later exiled by them, and how it was that after making the city

of the Volsci a slave to his country he with their aid brought his own

land in turn into an extremity of danger. (Mai, p. 146. Cp. Zonaras

7,16.)

[Sidenote: B.C. 491 (_a.u._ 263)] 2. ¶The same man wished to be made

prætor, and upon failing to secure the office became angry at the

populace; and in his displeasure at the great influence of the tribunes

he employed greater frankness in speaking to that body than was

attempted by others whose deeds entitled them to the same rank as

himself. A severe famine occurring at the same time that a town Norba

needed colonizing, the multitude censured the powerful classes on both

these points, maintaining that they were being deprived of food and were

being purposely delivered into the hands of enemies for manifest

destruction. Whenever persons come to suspect each other, they take

amiss everything even that is done in their behalf, and yield wholly to

their belligerent instincts. Coriolanus had invariably evinced contempt

for the people, and after grain had been brought in from many sources

(most of it sent as a gift from princes in Sicily) he would not allow

them to receive allotments of it as they were petitioning. Accordingly,

the tribunes, whose functions he was especially eager to abolish,

brought him to trial before the populace on a charge of aiming at

tyranny and drove him into exile. It availed nothing that all his peers

exclaimed and expressed their consternation at the fact that tribunes

dared to pass such sentences upon _their_ order. So on being expelled he

betook himself, raging at his treatment, to the Volsci, though they had

been his bitterest foes. His valor, of which they had had a taste, and

the wrath that he cherished toward his fellow-citizens gave him reason

to expect that they would receive him gladly, since they might hope,

thanks to him, to inflict upon the Romans injuries equal to what they

had endured, or even greater. When one has suffered particular damage at

the hands of any party, one is strongly inclined to believe in the

possibility of benefit from the same party in case it is willing and

also able to confer favors. (Mai, p.147. Cp. Zonaras 7, 16.) 3. For he

was very angry that they, who were incurring danger for their own

country would not even under these conditions withdraw from the

possessions of others. When, accordingly, this news also was brought,

the men did not cease any the more from factional strife. They were,

indeed, so bitterly at variance that they could be reconciled not even

by dangers. But the women, Volumnia the wife of Coriolanus and Veturia

his mother, gathering a company of the other most eminent ladies visited

him in camp and took his children with them; and they caused him to end

the war not only without requiring the submission of the country, but

without even demanding restoration from exile. For he admitted them at

once as soon as he learned they were there, and granted them a

conversation, the course of which was as follows. While the rest wept

without speaking Veturia began: "Why are you surprised, my child? Why

are you startled? We are not deserters, but the country has sent to you,

if you should yield, your mother and wife and children, if otherwise,

your spoil; hence, if even now you still are angry, kill us first. Why

do you weep? Why turn away? Can you fail to know how we have just ceased

lamenting the affairs of state, in order that we might see you? Be

reconciled to us, then, and retain no longer your anger against your

citizens, friends, temples, tombs; do not come rushing down into the

city with hostile wrath nor take by storm your native land in which you

were born, were reared, and became Coriolanus, bearer of this great

name. Yield to me, my child, and send me not hence without result,

unless you would see me dead by own hand."

At the end of this speech she sighed aloud, and tearing open her

clothing showed her breasts, and touching her abdomen exclaimed: "See,

my child, this brought you forth, these reared you up." When she had

said this, his wife and the children and the rest of the women joined

in the lament, so that he too was cast into grief. Recovering himself

at length with difficulty he embraced his mother and at the same time

kissing her replied: "Mother, I yield to you. Yours is the victory,

and let the other men, too, bestow their gratitude for this upon you.

For I can not endure even to see them, who after receiving such great

benefits at hands have treated me in such a way. Hence I never even

enter the city. Do you keep the country instead of me, since you have

so wished it, and I will take myself out of the way of you all."

Having spoken thus he withdrew. For through fear of the multitude and

shame before his peers, in that he had made an expedition against them

at all he would not accept even the safe return offered him, but

retired among the Volsci, and there, either as the result of a plot or

from old age, died. (Mai, p.148. Zonaras, 7, 16. Cp. John Tzetzes,

Letters, 6, p.9, 16.)

Dio's Rome, Volume 6 An Historical Narrative Originally Composed in Greek During the Reigns of Septimius Severus, Geta and Caracalla, Macrinus, Elagabalus and Alexander Severus: and Now Presented in English Form · 第 8 / 16 段