THE TRIAL IS INTERRUPTED THROUGH DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CALVIN AND THE
COUNCIL.
The Churches were to be appealed to, then, and Calvin applied himself
immediately to make the best he could of the case as it stood. With
the diligence that distinguished him, we need not doubt of his having
been soon ready with the Articles upon which the trial of Servetus may
be said to have entered on its third, if it were not its fourth and
definite, phase.[92] But a notable interval elapsed before we find the
Council giving any heed to the new Articles of Indictment, or taking
steps to have them despatched to the Cantons. The Council had business
of another kind to engage them, with Calvin and his friends as their
opponents on grounds of policy, instead of their instigators and guides
in a trial for heresy. It was at this precise time that the struggle
to which we have alluded in our review of the political situation took
place between Calvin and the Council on the right exercised by the
Consistory to excommunicate or deprive of Church privileges those who
were known to have infringed one or another of its arbitrary religious,
moral, or sumptuary regulations. Philibert Berthelier, having offended
in this direction, had fallen under the ban of the Consistory some time
before; but, having now appealed to the Council for redress against
what he held to be an unjust award, his party were powerful enough not
only to obtain a decision in his favour, but to have the Consistory
deprived of the right to excommunicate at all.
This was felt, of course, as a heavy blow by Calvin and his supporters.
Berthelier, formally absolved of the Consistorial interdict, was
declared at liberty to present himself at an approaching celebration of
the Solemn Supper. And he would probably have shown himself there, and
an unseemly scene would have ensued; for Calvin was as resolute to have
his authority respected within the walls of St. Peter’s Church, as the
Council could have been to have theirs upheld within the precincts of
the City. Berthelier himself, however, being advised that though he was
fully entitled to present himself at the Table, it would perhaps be as
well did he abstain from doing so for the present, took the hint and
stayed away. But several members of the Libertine party--each of whom
we must presume, in Calvin’s estimation, might have subscribed himself
as
Parcus Deorum cultor et infrequens,
uninformed of this, and expecting countenance from the presence of
their leader, offered themselves among the other communicants. Being
all well known to Calvin, however, they were resolutely warned off
by him. Covering the typical Bread and Cup with his outspread hands,
he declared that they should sooner hack them off than bring him to
minister to those he looked on as notorious scoffers at religion and
its most solemn rites. Here the minister was in his place and within
the pale of his office; so that they who came to browbeat and humble
him had to retreat from his presence with shame to themselves and
damage to their party, whilst he stood erect in the fearless discharge
of his duty, and rose higher than ever in the estimation of all lovers
of law and order, even of the stringent kind that prevailed in the
theo-autocratic city of Geneva.
The letter which Calvin wrote, at this stormy time, to his friend
Viret, of Lausanne, is too interesting and characteristic not to have a
place here:
... I had thought to have been silent about our affairs of
Geneva, fearing that I should only add needlessly to your other
anxieties; but lest rumours reaching you from other quarters
should distress you more than knowledge of the truth, I think
it best to tell you exactly what has happened.
When Ph. Berthelier was forbidden to present himself at the
Lord’s Table some year and half ago, he then appealed to the
Council against the decree of the Consistory. We were called
into court to hold the scoundrel (_nebulo_) in check; and
when the case had been heard, the Senate declared that he had
been properly excommunicated. From that time until now he has
been quiet; whether in despair of mending matters or through
indifference, I know not. But now, and before the Syndicate
of Perrin expires, he would have himself reinstated by the
Council in spite of the Consistory. I was again summoned, and
in copious words I showed that this could with no propriety be
done; that it would not be lawful, indeed, to counteract in
any such way the discipline of the Church. When my back was
turned, however, the Consistory not having been further heard
or represented, permission was given him by the Council to
present himself at the Table. This being told to me, I took
care immediately to have the Syndic summon a special meeting
of the Council, at which I entered with such fulness into the
question, as to leave nothing which in my opinion could be said
further to make them change their mind--now vehement, now more
persuasive, I strove to bring them to a right way of thinking.
I even declared that I would sooner die, opposing their decree,
than profane the Sacred Table of the Lord.... The Senate
nevertheless replied that they saw no reason to depart from the
judgment already given.
From this you will perceive that I should have nothing for
it but to quit my ministry, did I suffer the authority of
the Consistory to be trodden under foot, and consented to
administer the Supper of Christ to the openly contumacious
who declare that we Pastors of the Church are nothing to
them. But, as I say, I would sooner die a hundred deaths than
subject Christ to so foul a mockery. What I said yesterday
at two meetings, I need not recapitulate. But the wicked and
lost among us will now have all they desire. In so far as I
am concerned, it is the Church’s calamity that distresses me.
If God, however, give such licence to Satan that I am to be
thwarted in my ministry by violent decrees, I am as good as
dead in my office. But he who inflicts the wound will find the
salve; and truly, when I see how the wicked have gone on all
these years with such impunity, the Lord perhaps prepares
some judgment for me, in respect of my unworthiness. Whatever
befals, it is nevertheless for us to submit to his will.
Farewell, and may God be with you always, guide you and protect
you! Pray incessantly that He consider this our miserable
Church!
Geneva, The day before the nones (4th) of September, 1553.